DOCSLIB.ORG

Tornado Alley Film Summative Evaluation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tornado Alley Film Summative Evaluation Report Tornado Alley Film Summative Evaluation Report September 15, 2014 Tornado Alley Film Summative Evaluation Report Submitted to: Deborah Raksany Giant Screen Films 500 Davis Street Suite 1005 Evanston, IL 60201 Submitted by: Elizabeth Goldman Kim Streitburger RMC Research Corporation 1000 Market Street, Bldg. #2 Portsmouth, NH 03801 September 15, 2014 CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................1 Evaluation Methodology ........................................................................................................6 Section I. Tornado Alley Film Evaluation ...............................................................................8 Methodology ..............................................................................................................8 Survey Respondents...................................................................................................9 Survey Findings ..........................................................................................................10 Focus Group Participants ...........................................................................................22 Focus Group Findings .................................................................................................23 Survey Summary ........................................................................................................34 Focus Group Summary ...............................................................................................36 Section II. Educator Guide Evaluation ....................................................................................38 Introduction ...............................................................................................................38 Survey Findings ..........................................................................................................38 Summary ....................................................................................................................44 Section III. Professional Development Workshop and Grant-Funded ...................................46 Community Projects Introduction ...............................................................................................................46 Survey Findings ..........................................................................................................47 Grant-Funded Community Projects ...........................................................................51 Summary ....................................................................................................................60 Section IV. Educational Outreach and Vehicle Tour Evaluation ............................................64 Methodology ..............................................................................................................65 Institutional Outreach ................................................................................................65 Remote and Underserved Outreach ..........................................................................74 Summary ....................................................................................................................85 Institutional Outreach ................................................................................................85 Remote and Underserved Outreach ..........................................................................86 i CONTENTS Appendices Appendix A. Tornado Alley PreViewing Survey Appendix B. Tornado Alley PostViewing Survey Appendix C. TA Focus Group Survey Appendix D. Tornado Alley Focus Group Questions Appendix E. Tornado-Educators Guide Appendix F. Educator Survey Appendix G. Franklin Institute Evaluation Form Appendix H. Franklin Institute Facilitator Questions Appendix I. Local Project Planning Application Appendix J. Community Project Interview Appendix K. Tornado Outreach Log Appendix L. Tornado Outreach Museum Host Survey Appendix M. Tornado Outreach Site Survey Appendix N. Outreach Staff Quests Appendix O. Outreach in Joplin Missouri ii Executive Summary Tornados can occur anywhere in the U.S., but most occur in “tornado alley”—a broad swath of the country’s heartland that stretches from Georgia in the East to the Rocky Mountains in the West. And despite decades of research, tornados remain scientific mysteries. The VORTEX2 research project, funded by NSF and NOAA, is the most ambitious attempt yet to understand tornados—their origins, structure, and evolution. Directed by Sean Casey of TV tornado chasing fame and featuring the scientists and missions of VORTEX2, the Tornado Alley film and the surrounding project elements were designed to “bring science to life”, engaging audiences in the excitement of scientific research and the stupendous technologies involved in investigating these awe- inspiring and terrible weather phenomena, and model science as a “cool” career for young people. The Tornado Alley project contained five elements: • The 3-D, large format Tornado Alley film; • A Tornado Alley Educator’s Guide, website, and resources; • Professional development workshops utilizing cybertechnology to allow museum-based informal science educators and formal educators interact remotely with VORTEX2 researchers and experience visualizations of weather data, and to subsequently conduct related educational programs in their own communities; • Outreach using the tornado intercept vehicles (TIV) and Doppler on Wheels (DOW) to bring scientists and weather-monitoring technology into direct contact with audiences at museums and science centers; and • Outreach using scientists, the TIV and DOW and a traveling 3D projection system to present elements of the Tornado Alley film and featured weather research technology to tornado- affected and underserved communities. Each element of the project was evaluated independently using a mix of quantitative and qualitative data gathered through surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Findings are presented here in terms of project goals; individual descriptions of each Tornado Alley element appear in following sections. Within the project’s overarching goal of communicating weather science research and information to public and professional audiences, eight specific goals were enunciated: • to increase audience members’ factual knowledge of science • to increase audience members’ understanding of the scientific process and the work scientists do • to increase audience members’ knowledge of technologies used in weather science • to increase audience members’ interest in participating in scientific endeavors • to increase student interest in weather science and careers • to increase teacher confidence in teaching weather science and related STEM topics • to increase scientists’ confidence and interest in sharing their work with wider audiences • to incorporate project resources in educational curricula or programming The Tornado Alley project addressed the overarching goal through all five elements, most directly through the film itself and the outreach efforts. Introduced in 2011, the film was seen by more than 5 million viewers as of the date of this report, and is anticipated to reach over 7 million during its theatrical life. Educator materials, including an educator guide, posters, and a website, have reached thousands. (Nearly 600,000 visitors have accessed the website to date.) The museum-based outreach efforts significantly supported the film in the majority of US venues: 67 museums or science centers, or over 80% of exhibitors, hosted the TIV and/or the DOW vehicles, and over 200 unique events were held at the 79 institutional theaters. A very conservative estimate for the audience directly reached through these activities (those who physically toured a vehicle, had a conversation with a scientist, etc.) is 150,000 across the US, although at least 250,000 likely experienced at least a passive interaction. Outreach to tornado-affected communities included activities at 7 sites in 2012, considered a pilot phase, and at 20 sites in 2013. Venues ranged from small museums without theaters to community centers and school gymnasiums to challenging "untraditional" sites—such as a warehouse space located adjacent to trailers being used as temporary classrooms in a town that had been completely leveled by a recent tornado, or a special section of a Lowe's Home improvement store which hosted the screenings indoors and provided a community resource fair featuring researchers, first responders, etc. outdoors in its parking lot. The program’s second phase in 2013 emphasized outreach to economically underserved areas—both urban and rural. Programs were held in areas of Missouri, with high minority populations, such as Ferguson, MO, as well as Indian Reservations in South Dakota, located in the nation’s poorest county (Buffalo County, SD). The professional development program enabled the development of at least fourteen new models for informal science practitioners who seek to engage audiences (teachers, students, or families) with tornado science, the nature of scientific research, or data analysis content. Factual Knowledge of Science Surveys from potential and actual viewers and focus groups with viewers of the Tornado Alley film highlight some key knowledge gains reported by audience members. Primary among them were a greater understanding of the scientific process and more, and new knowledge about how tornados form. Following the film
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ACE's Scandinavian Sojourn
    ACE’s Scandinavian Sojourn : A Southerner’s Perspective Story by: Richard Bostic, assisted by Ronny Cook When I went on the ACEspana trip back in 2009, it was by far one of the most amazing vacations I have ever experienced. In addition to getting to visit parks in a different culture than we see here, it is also a great opportunity to spend time with fellow enthusiasts and grow friendships while enjoying our common interests. When Scandinavia Sojourn was announced for the summer of 2011, I knew it was a trip I could not miss. Since the 2009 trip was my first trip to Europe I thought that there was no way the over- all experience could be better in Scandinavia. I was wrong. We landed in Helsinki, Finland around 1300 the day before we were required to be at the hotel to meet with the group. Helsinki is an interesting city and fairly new compared to many cities in Europe. Walking around the city you can see the Russian influence in the city’s architecture. In fact, many movies during the cold war would use Helsinki to shoot scenes that are supposed to be set in the Soviet Union. After making our way to the Crowne Plaza Hotel and getting a quick lunch at the hotel restaurant we decided to spend the remaining time that afternoon checking out some of the sites around our hotel. Some of these sites included the Temppeliaukio Church inside of a rock formation, the train station, Routatientori Square and National Theater, and a couple of the city’s art museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Data Sources in Connecticut Patricia A
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn College of Agriculture, Health and Natural Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station Resources 1-1982 Climate Data Sources in Connecticut Patricia A. Palley University of Connecticut - Storrs David R. Miller University of Connecticut - Storrs Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/saes Part of the Climate Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, and the Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Palley, Patricia A. and Miller, David R., "Climate Data Sources in Connecticut" (1982). Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station. 80. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/saes/80 Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 461 Climate Data Sources in Connecticut By Patricia A Palley, Assistant State Climatologist and David R. Miller, Associate Professor of Natural Resources JAN 1982 STORRS AGRICULTURAL EXPERI MENT STATION COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT, STORRS. CT 06268 TABLE OF CONTENTS Int roduction . 1 Types of Weather Stations 2 Parameters Measur ed 3 Summary of Climate Observations in Connecticu t 5 How to Use the Maps and Site Reports • • • • • 7 Table I Record Lengths, by parameter, of all weather stat ions i n Conn., state summary 8 Table II Record Lengths , by parame ter, of all weather stations in Conn . , by county . 9 Table III Record Lengths, by paramet er, of Nationa l Wea ther Service operat ed and coope rative stations in Conn., by county . • . 10 Table IV Re cord Lengths , by par ameter , of pr ivate data collect ors i n Conn ., by county . • . 11 Figure I Distribution of stations t hat measure rainfall . 12 Figur e II Distribution of stations t hat meas ure s nowf all .
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook for the Meteorological Observation
    Handbook for the Meteorological Observation Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut KNMI September 2000 Contents Chapter 1. Measuring stations – General 1 Introduction 2 Variables 3 Type of observing station 4 Conditions relating to the layout of the measurement site of a weather station 5 Spatial distribution of the measuring stations and the representativeness of the observations 6 Procedures relating to the inspection, maintenance and management of a weather station 6.1 Inspection 6.2 Technical maintenance 6.3 Supervision 1. MEASURING STATIONS - GENERAL 1.1 Introduction The mission statement of the KNMI1 (from their brochure “KNMI, more than just weather” of August 1999) reads: “The KNMI is an agency with approximately five hundred employees that is part of the Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management. From its position as the national knowledge centre for weather, climate and seismology, the institute is targeted entirely at fulfilling public tasks: weather forecasts and warnings monitoring the climate acquisition and supply of meteorological data and infrastructure model development aviation meteorology scientific research public information services” The tasks mentioned above are split across a number of sectors within the KNMI. One of the sectors is WM (Waarnemingen en Modellen = Observations and Models). This particular sector’s mission has been formulated as follows: “The Observations and Models sector (WM) is responsible for making the basic meteorological data available and for provision of climatological information to both internal and external users. The basic meteorological data, both current and historical, contains: - observations made by measurement, visual observation, using remote sensing or acquired from external sources - output from atmospheric and oceanographic models, acquired by processing the sector’s own models of acquired from institutes abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 6 Weather: Collecting Data GRADE 3-5 BACKGROUND Meteorologists Collect Weather Data Daily to Make Forecasts
    Lesson 6 Weather: Collecting Data GRADE 3-5 BACKGROUND Meteorologists collect weather data daily to make forecasts. With the aid of high altitude weather balloons, weather equipment and gauges, satellites, and computers, accurate daily forecasts can be made. Collecting weather data in just one location and making a forecast requires a great deal of skill. Since air travels from one location to another, it is helpful to know what the approaching weather will be. In this investigation, the students will collect data for two weeks. At this time they will start seeing patterns in each of the areas. They can predict what the weather will be like the next day and for the next few days. They will also write if their predictions were correct from the previous day. Collecting the data for this lesson can be done instead of collecting the data separately in lesson 1-4. BASIC LESSON Objective(s) Students will be able to… Collect data for two weeks and use the information to detect patterns and predict weather around their location. State Science Content Standard(s) Standard 4. Students through the inquiry process, demonstrate knowledge of the composition, structures, processes and interactions of Earth's systems and other objects in space. A. 4.4 Observe and describe the water cycle and the local weather and demonstrate how weather conditions are measured. A. Record temperature B. Display data on a graph C. Interpret trends and patterns of data D. Identify and explain the use of a barometer, weather vane, and anemometer E. Collect, record and chart data from each weather instrument F.
    [Show full text]
  • Soaring Weather
    Chapter 16 SOARING WEATHER While horse racing may be the "Sport of Kings," of the craft depends on the weather and the skill soaring may be considered the "King of Sports." of the pilot. Forward thrust comes from gliding Soaring bears the relationship to flying that sailing downward relative to the air the same as thrust bears to power boating. Soaring has made notable is developed in a power-off glide by a conven­ contributions to meteorology. For example, soar­ tional aircraft. Therefore, to gain or maintain ing pilots have probed thunderstorms and moun­ altitude, the soaring pilot must rely on upward tain waves with findings that have made flying motion of the air. safer for all pilots. However, soaring is primarily To a sailplane pilot, "lift" means the rate of recreational. climb he can achieve in an up-current, while "sink" A sailplane must have auxiliary power to be­ denotes his rate of descent in a downdraft or in come airborne such as a winch, a ground tow, or neutral air. "Zero sink" means that upward cur­ a tow by a powered aircraft. Once the sailcraft is rents are just strong enough to enable him to hold airborne and the tow cable released, performance altitude but not to climb. Sailplanes are highly 171 r efficient machines; a sink rate of a mere 2 feet per second. There is no point in trying to soar until second provides an airspeed of about 40 knots, and weather conditions favor vertical speeds greater a sink rate of 6 feet per second gives an airspeed than the minimum sink rate of the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Rigid Wing Sailboats: a State of the Art Survey Manuel F
    Ocean Engineering 187 (2019) 106150 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oceaneng Review Rigid wing sailboats: A state of the art survey Manuel F. Silva a,b,<, Anna Friebe c, Benedita Malheiro a,b, Pedro Guedes a, Paulo Ferreira a, Matias Waller c a Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal b INESC TEC, Campus da Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal c Åland University of Applied Sciences, Neptunigatan 17, AX-22111 Mariehamn, Åland, Finland ARTICLEINFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The design, development and deployment of autonomous sustainable ocean platforms for exploration and Autonomous sailboat monitoring can provide researchers and decision makers with valuable data, trends and insights into the Wingsail largest ecosystem on Earth. Although these outcomes can be used to prevent, identify and minimise problems, Robotics as well as to drive multiple market sectors, the design and development of such platforms remains an open challenge. In particular, energy efficiency, control and robustness are major concerns with implications for autonomy and sustainability. Rigid wingsails allow autonomous boats to navigate with increased autonomy due to lower power consumption and increased robustness as a result of mechanically simpler control compared to traditional sails. These platforms are currently the subject of deep interest, but several important research problems remain open. In order to foster dissemination and identify future trends, this paper presents a survey of the latest developments in the field of rigid wing sailboats, describing the main academic and commercial solutions both in terms of hardware and software.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Weather Ready Nation: Science Imperatives for Severe Thunderstorm Research, Held 24-26 April, 2012 in Birmingham AL
    Workshop on Weather Ready Nation: Science Imperatives for Severe Thunderstorm Research, Held 24-26 April, 2012 in Birmingham AL Sponsored by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and National Science Foundation Final Report Edited by Michael K. Lindell, Texas A&M University and Harold Brooks, National Severe Storms Laboratory Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center Texas A&M University College station TX 77843-3137 17 September 2012 Executive Summary The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) workshop sponsored a workshop entitled Weather Ready Nation: Science Imperatives for Severe Thunderstorm Research on 24-26 April, 2012 in Birmingham Alabama. Prior to the workshop, teams of authors completed eight white papers, which were read by workshop participants before arriving at the conference venue. The workshop’s 63 participants—representing the disciplines of civil engineering, communication, economics, emergency management, geography, meteorology, psychology, public health, public policy, sociology, and urban planning—participated in three sets of discussion groups. In the first set of discussion groups, participants were assigned to groups by discipline and asked to identify any research issues related to tornado hazard response that had been overlooked by the 2011 Norman Workshop report (UCAR, 2012) or the white papers (see Appendix A). In the second set of discussion groups, participants were distributed among interdisciplinary groups and asked to revisit the questions addressed in the disciplinary groups, identify any interdependencies across disciplines, and recommend criteria for evaluating prospective projects. In the third set of discussion groups, participants returned to their initial disciplinary groups and were asked to identify and describe at least three specific research projects within the research areas defined by their white paper(s) and to assess these research projects in terms of the evaluation criteria identified in the interdisciplinary groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Roller Coasters
    Aalto University School of Engineering Master’s Programme in Building Technology Design of Roller Coasters Master’s Thesis 24.7.2018 Antti Väisänen Aalto University, P.O. BOX 11000, 00076 AALTO www.aalto.fi Abstract of master's thesis Author Antti Väisänen Title of thesis Design of Roller Coasters Master programme Building Technology Code ENG27 Thesis supervisor Vishal Singh Thesis advisor Anssi Tamminen Date 24/07/2018 Number of pages 75 Language English Abstract This thesis combines several years of work experience in amusement industry and a litera- ture review to present general guidelines and principles of what is included in the design and engineering of roller coasters and other guest functions attached to them. Roller coasters are iconic structures that provide safe thrills for riders. Safety is achieved using multiple safety mechanisms: for example, bogies have multiple wheels that hold trains on track, a block system prevents trains from colliding and riders are held in place with safety restraints. Regular maintenance checks are also performed to prevent accidents caused by failed parts. Roller coasters are designed using a heartline spline and calculating accelerations in all possible scenarios to prevent rollbacks and too high values of accelerations, which could cause damage to riders’ bodies. A reach envelope is applied to the spline to prevent riders from hitting nearby objects. The speed and curvature of the track combined create acceler- ations that need to be countered with adequate track and support structures. A track cross- section usually consists of rails, cross-ties and a spine, while support structures can vary depending on height and loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Sean Casey
    INTERVIEW WITH SEAN CASEY YOU HAD COME UP WITH THE IDEA FOR THE TIV WHEN YOU WERE LOCKED OUT OF A MINIVAN IN A STORM, CORRECT? Well, actually, we had come up with the concept the year before, but getting locked out of a minivan with a tornado right next to us, that kind of confirms my sneaking suspicion that if we were going to be that close we should have something a bit more rugged. WERE THERE ANY OTHER INSPIRATIONS FOR THE TIV? Mainly it was just a feeling that, you know, there’s a huge difference between filming a tornado from a couple miles away with a telephoto lens, and filming a tornado that’s on top of you with a wide-angle lens. And that’s really where all the action is. It’s right next to the tornado. And it’s close in the tornado. That’s the kind of power that I wanted to capture. I wanted to get footage that really was as powerful as the subject matter. HOW DID YOU FEEL DURING THE GOSHEN INTERCEPT? Of course it’s hard to describe. In the moment, a part of you is fearing for your life. A part of you is just overjoyed and kind of in shock. I think I was in shock at the time, really. It was such an unbelievable experience. Unbelievable to see a tornado forming half a mile away. You pick the right spot, and it’s just coming right at you, and to bear witness to that. And another thing is I’m trying not to mess up.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Magazine Spring 2016
    SPRING 2016 SPRING 2016 SPECIAL ciweek 2016 PROGRAM EDITION FREE To Dream THE POWER of Dreaming Big CHASING DREAMS COVER PHOTO: and the Nasty Side of Mother Nature JAMIE FOXX IN FULL ELECTRO MAKEUP FOR THE AMAZING SPIDERMAN 2. THE ART OF MAKEUP and So Much More DREAM with Focus www.dmacc.edu/ciweek LAURA JOHNSON | Merit Resources When you partner with the INS Family of Companies for your business solutions, you’re freed up to focus on what you do best. We’ll equip and support you with a full suite of business solutions including Technology, HR and Contact Center services. Offering our unique combination of top-level talent, technology and tools, we’re your valued productivity partner on the road to success. INSFamilyOfCompanies.com THE INS FAMILY OF COMPANIES One experience for everything in your life Come to Microsoft and check out Surface Pro 3, Windows Phones, and more Microsoft at Jordan Creek Town Center 101 Jordan Creek Parkway West Des Moines, IA 50266 Some apps sold separately. Some features require Windows 8.1 Update, available through Windows Update. Internet access required; fees may apply. FEATURES 7 | The Power of Dreaming Big BY SCOTT SIEPKER 13 | Chasing Dreams and the Nasty Side of Mother Nature BY DR. REED TIMMER 19 | The Art of Makeup And So Much More BY HOWARD BERGER 25 | Dream with Focus BY JASON KIESAU 31 | Student Spotlight: Dreaming Reality BY JAMIN MYCAL HARDENBROOK PROGRAM CELEBRATE! INNOVATION MAGAZINE 34 | Welcome IS PUBLISHED BIANNUALLY PROVOST ANTHONY D. PAUSTIAN, Ph.D. BY DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE WEST CAMPUS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 AMS Awards Brochure
    2020 Awards AMS Fellow Ping Chang Professor and Chair Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas Ping Chang is a professor and the Louis & Elizabath Scherck chair in oceanography and serves as the director of the International Laboratory for High-Resolution Earth System Prediction at Texas A&M University. He received his Ph.D. from Princeton University in 1988. His research focuses on climate dynamics and modeling. He is a contributing author of the fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and an author of ~140 peer-reviewed scientific journal papers. AMS Fellow Donna J. Charlevoix Director UNAVCO, Boulder, Colorado Dr. Donna Charlevoix is director of Education and Community Engagement for UNAVCO and the NSF-supported GAGE facility. She worked for over a decade in academia as faculty after which she transitioned to work for non-profits that support federally-funded science facilities. She is actively involved in atmospheric science education research, co-authors university science textbooks, and serves in the leadership of the American Meteorological Society. She resides with her family in Colorado. AMS Fellow Jeffrey L. Collett, Jr. Professor Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado Dr. Collett is a professor and head of Colorado State University’s Atmospheric Science Department. He studied at MIT (Chemical Engineering) and Caltech (Environmental Engineering Science), before completing a postdoc at ETH- Zurich. Principal research topics include emissions and air quality impacts from oil and gas development; the sources, transport and deposition of reactive nitrogen pollutants; air quality impacts of wild and prescribed fires; aerosol chemistry; and air pollution processing by clouds and fogs.
    [Show full text]
  • 38Th Conference on Radar Meteorology
    38th Conference on Radar Meteorology 28 August – 1 September 2017 Swissôtel Hotel Chicago, IL 38TH CONFERENCE ON RADAR METEOROLOGY 28 AUGUST-1 SEPTEMBER 2017 SWISSÔTEL CHICAGO, IL CONNECT Conference Twitter: #AMSRadar2017 Conference Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AMSradar2017/ ORGANIZERS The 38th Conference on Radar Meteorology is organized by the AMS Radar Meteorology and hosted by the American Meteorological Society. SPONSORS Thank you to the sponsoring organizations that helped make the 38th Conference on Radar Meteorology possible: PROGRAM COMMITTEE Co-Chairs: Scott Collis, ANL, Argonne, IL and Scott Ellis, NCAR, Boulder, CO New and Emerging Radar Technology Lead: Stephen Frasier, University of Massachusetts * Vijay Venkatesh, NASA Goddard * Boon Leng Cheong, University of Oklahoma * Bradley Isom, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory * Eric Loew, NCAR EOL * Jim George, Colorado State University Radar Networks, Quality Control, Processing and Software Lead: Daniel Michelson, Environment Canada * Adrian Loftus, NASA and University of Maryland * Francesc Junyent, Colorado State Univeristy * Hidde Leijnse, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) * Joseph Hardin, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory General Information Quantitative Precipitation Estimation and Hydrology Lead: Walter Petersen, NASA-MSFC * Amber Emory, NASA * David Wolff, NASA * Jian Zhang, NSSL/OU AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY Microphysical Studies with Radars Lead: Christopher Williams, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder * Daniel Dawson, Purdue University * Matthew Kumjian, Pennsylvania State University * Marcus van Lier-Walqui, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies Organized Convection and Severe Phenomena Lead: Tammy Weckwerth, National Center for Atmospheric Research * Angela Rowe, University of Washington * Karen Kosiba, Center for Severe Weather Research * Kevin Knupp, University of Alabama, Huntsville * Timothy Lang, NASA * Stephen Guidmond, Univ.
    [Show full text]