Rights and Responsibilities in Great Power Politics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rights and Responsibilities in Great Power Politics RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN GREAT POWER POLITICS by Wesley O’Dell A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland July, 2016 © 2016 Wesley O’Dell All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT This project identifies a puzzle in how academics and policymakers have described international politics: the phrase ‘Great Power rights and responsibilities’ is widely-used and has been for centuries, but there exists no widely-shared understanding of what this term means, what it signifies theoretically about the casual relationships among states, and even from where the concepts underlying it historically came. It then posits answers to these questions, identifying these origins in the practices of feudal Europe and tracing their development into a complex of Great Power rights and responsibilities as feudal order gave way to an early modern states-system. Though formally anarchical, this system was actually ordered by a sophisticated social arrangement of Great Power relationships based on mutually-comprehensible rights and duties expressed through a shared identity as well as a number of differentiated roles unique to individual Powers. The material abilities of its Powers were understood in light of their moral commitments to their peers, to the political community around them, and to their own self-understandings. These encouraged certain behaviors, discouraged others, and kept European international activity rooted in a shared political culture. The project then examines how, over time, this arrangement was institutionalized to the point that the internal identity of a Great Power became a reified social status, while the roles of rights and duties expressed by the individual Powers came to exert legitimatized ordering authority across regions and issue areas. However, the behavioral routines and cognitive patterns of the complex did not evolve as the moral and material contexts of the 19th century went through their own profound transformations. This incongruity made an upheaval event possible as the system crowded itself out: more Powers meant more roles ii expressing more authority claims of rights and duties, and this would necessarily multiply areas of tension and points of potential conflict in a system with greater violence potential than ever before. This project concludes by demonstrating how periodic moments of role overlap between pairs of Powers led to the July Crisis of 1914 and, ultimately, to the shattering of the right- and responsibility-complex that fostered its necessary conditions. Readers: Reneé Marlin-Bennett Nikolas Jabko Daniel Deudney Mary Favret Ronald Walters iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am fortunate to have many people in many different communities to thank for their contributions to this dissertation as well as for their support and encouragement. At Washington & Lee University, I was taught by a remarkable group of people whose commitment to inspiring undergraduates through scholarship was matched only by their fundamental decency and surpassed only by their rigorous standards. Professor Mark Rush deserves special mention for his encouragement of my work and for the many remarkable opportunities for scholarly growth he has provided me over the years. The men and women of the George C. Marshall Foundation also deserve recognition as special patrons of my undergraduate scholarship, especially my supervisor on Volume Six of the Marshall Papers Project, the late Sharon Ritenour Stevens. At the University of Cambridge, I was privileged to learn from Professor Christopher Clark (St Catharine’s), whose teaching influenced how I think about international affairs to a degree I have only come to appreciate years later. Professor Antony Lentin (Wolfson) and his wife Monica have also been tremendous friends and supporters; if I someday display half the erudition, half the eloquence, and half the graciousness of Professor Lentin, the scholar and the man, I will count myself lucky. At The Johns Hopkins University, I am particularly thankful for Dr. Jared Hickman, who provided me with one of the most engaging intellectual experiences of my life, took an interest in my ideas, and encouraged me to refine them in what eventually became my first peer-reviewed article. Similarly, I will always be grateful to Professor Siba Grovogui for introducing me to so many new ways of thinking about the world in his many seminars, as well as for the way he valued and respected my contributions. To iv my dissertation committee, you have my sincere thanks for your guidance and your willingness to engage with my work. To my supervisor, Professor Reneé Marlin-Bennett, I am truly humbled by your gracious assistance with this project. Finally, I wish to recognize the friends and family that have so generously shared my life over these challenging years. Mes sieurs Richard S. Cleary Jr., Scott G. Centorino, and J. Zak Ritchie have been stalwart friends as well as gentlemen whom I respect and admire. Special mention must be made of Dr. Stephen Mann and his wife Priscilla, whose kindness and generosity have followed me by some quirk of fate since I made Stephen’s chance acquaintance as an undergraduate. They welcomed me into their hearts and home during my studies at Cambridge, and they have since done the same for my wife and our friends and relatives. I cherish their friendship, and will always think of them as family. To my parents, Jodie and Rayna, I owe thanks for everything that I have, everything that I will have, and all that is good in me. No words can properly credit them for helping me to become who I am, for supporting me unconditionally through good times and bad, and for being my first, and most significant, teachers. Most of all, I am grateful for my wife, Natalie. She has suffered and endured more than I can know for my sake. Her strength and courage inspire me, her love and support nourish me, and it is the vision of my future with her that makes straight my way. I dedicate these pages to her. v TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables . vii List of Figures . viii I. Introduction . 1 II. Feudal Rights and Duties in the Early International System . 32 III. Rights and Duties in International Society . 80 IV. Progress Without Change: Rising Powers in the Nineteenth Century . 140 V. Success, Anxiety, and Crisis . 174 VI. Conclusion . 234 Appendix I: Glossary . 254 Appendix II: Chronology . 256 Bibliography . 263 Curriculum Vitae . 275 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1: Great Powers in Three Eras Table 3.2: Shared Rights and Duties, 1648-1789 Table 3.3: Categories and Functions of Right- and Duty-claims vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Ideal-typical Distribution of Emphasis among IR Paradigms Figure 1.2: Anarchy, Semi-archy, and Hierarchy Figure 1.3: The Production of Right- and Responsibility-based Great Power Politics Figure 2.1: Three Developmental Tracks of Rights and Duties Figure 3.1: The Formation of Great Power identity Figure 3.2: Genealogy of Great Power Identity Right- and Duty-claims, 1648-1813 Figure 3.3: Developmental Typology of Right- and Duty-claims Figure 3.4: Components of a Great Power Role Figure 4.1: The Vienna Concretization Figure 5.1: Great Power Role Dyads in 1914 viii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more. - Jesus of Nazareth No nation can claim rights without acknowledging the duties that go with the rights. During the seven and a half years that I was President . [the United States] never failed to treat both strong and weak with courtesy and justice; and against the weak when they misbehaved we were slower to assert our rights than we were against the strong. My endeavor [in international affairs] was not only to assert these rights, but frankly and fully to acknowledge the duties that went with the rights. -Theodore Roosevelt We have tried to emphasize that because of China’s extraordinary development over the last two decades, that with expanding power and prosperity also comes increased responsibilities. - Barack Obama1 Capacity, right, and responsibility are frequently spoken of as though they are linked together in the organization of social and political life. However, the diversity of the discourse surrounding them conceals an often-unrecognized diversity of meaning. This is the problem academic international relations (IR) faces when it turns to how these concepts manifest themselves in world politics: a veneer of rhetorical similarity conceals real dissonance in how they are understood. Though these concepts are seemingly familiar, there is a actually counterintuitive absence of sustained, rigorous theorizing about them as a tripartite topic. To offer a remedy, this study will develop a conceptual framework within which material capacity, right, and responsibility are understood as an interwoven unity shaping world politics: a complex of ‘Great Power rights and responsibilities’. 1 Luke 12:48 (King James Version); Theodore Roosevelt, An Autobiography (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1922), 502, 505; Remarks Prior to a Meeting With Vice President Xi Jinping of China, Daily Comp. Pres. Docs. 201200097 (February 14, 2012). 1 The following six chapters will disentangle the many conceptual and historical components surrounding these concepts. This introduction explores the strengths and weaknesses of existing scholarship, articulating a new understanding of the right- and responsibility-complex as a key point of material-moral juncture influencing international norms and mediating international anarchy. Subsequent chapters each examine a discrete historical and conceptual facet of how this came to be. Chapter Two explores the theory linking together capacity, right, and duty within international politics, tracing the antecedents of the complex to feudal norms. Chapter Three examines the sociology of a ‘textbook’ Great Power system in the 18th century, exposing the macro-level operation of the identity and role mechanisms that demarcated its attitudes and determined its characteristic behaviors.
Recommended publications
  • Processes of Byzantinisation and Serbian Archaeology Byzantine Heritage and Serbian Art I Byzantine Heritage and Serbian Art I–Iii
    I BYZANTINE HERITAGE AND SERBIAN ART I BYZANTINE HERITAGE AND SERBIAN ART AND SERBIAN BYZANTINE HERITAGE PROCESSES OF BYZANTINISATION AND SERBIAN ARCHAEOLOGY BYZANTINE HERITAGE AND SERBIAN ART I BYZANTINE HERITAGE AND SERBIAN ART I–III Editors-in-Chief LJUBOMIR MAKSIMOVIć JELENA TRIVAN Edited by DANICA POPOVić DraGAN VOJVODić Editorial Board VESNA BIKIć LIDIJA MERENIK DANICA POPOVić ZoraN raKIć MIODraG MARKOVić VlADIMIR SIMić IGOR BOROZAN DraGAN VOJVODić Editorial Secretaries MARka TOMić ĐURić MILOš ŽIVKOVIć Reviewed by VALENTINO PACE ElIZABETA DIMITROVA MARKO POPOVić MIROSLAV TIMOTIJEVIć VUJADIN IVANIšEVić The Serbian National Committee of Byzantine Studies P.E. Službeni glasnik Institute for Byzantine Studies, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts PROCESSES OF BYZANTINISATION AND SERBIAN ARCHAEOLOGY Editor VESNA BIKIć BELGRADE, 2016 PUBLished ON THE OCCasiON OF THE 23RD InternatiOnaL COngress OF Byzantine STUdies This book has been published with the support of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia CONTENTS PREFACE 11 I. BYZANTINISATION IN THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXT THE DYNAMICS OF BYZANTINE–SERBIAN POLITICAL RELATIONS 17 Srđan Pirivatrić THE ‘MEDIEVAL SERBIAN OECUMENE’ – FICTION OR REALITY? 37 Mihailo St. Popović BYZANTINE INFLUENCE ON ADMINISTRATION IN THE TIME OF THE NEMANJIĆ DYNASTY 45 Stanoje Bojanin Bojana Krsmanović FROM THE ROMAN CASTEL TO THE SERBIAN MEDIEVAL CITY 53 Marko Popović THE BYZANTINE MODEL OF A SERBIAN MONASTERY: CONSTRUCTION AND ORGANISATIONAL CONCEPT 67 Gordana
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from aiy type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photogrq>hs, print bleedthrou^ substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photogr£q)hs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for aiy photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Com pany 300 North Z eeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ivll 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9517109 Unofficial histories of France in the late Middle Ages. (Volumes I and n) Zale, Sanford C., Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Late-Medieval France
    Late-Medieval France: A Nation under Construction A study of French national identity formation and the emerging of national consciousness, before and during the Hundred Years War, 1200-1453 Job van den Broek MA History of Politics and Society Dr. Christian Wicke Utrecht University 22 June 2020 Word count: 13.738 2 “Ah! Doulce France! Amie, je te lairay briefment”1 -Attributed to Bertrand du Guesclin, 1380 Images on front page: The kings of France, England, Navarre and the duke of Burgundy (as Count of Charolais), as depicted in the Grand Armorial Équestre de la Toison d’Or, 1435- 1438. 1 Cuvelier in Charrière, volume 2, pp 320. ”Ah, sweet France, my friend, I must leave you very soon.” Translation my own. 2 3 Abstract Whether nations and nationalism are ancient or more recent phenomena is one of the core debates of nationalism studies. Since the 1980’s, modernism, claiming that nations are distinctively modern, has been the dominant view. In this thesis, I challenge this dominant view by doing an extensive case-study into late-medieval France, applying modernist definitions and approaches to a pre-modern era. France has by many regarded as one of the ‘founding fathers’ of the club of nations and has a long and rich history and thus makes a case-study for such an endeavour. I start with mapping the field of French identity formation in the thirteenth century, which mostly revolved around the royal court in Paris. With that established, I move on to the Hundred Years War and the consequences of this war for French identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Magna-Carta-Timeline.Pdf
    Date Event 6 February King John sails for La Rochelle to begin a military campaign against the French. 1214 Many of his barons refuse to accompany him, or send knights to serve in his army. June-July 1214 John’s barons from Poitou (France) desert his army. With his path blocked by the French Prince Louis, John is unable to join his allies in Flanders, and is forced to retreat to La Rochelle. 27 July 1214 King John’s allies, the Flemings, Germans and an English contingent led by the earl of Salisbury, are defeated by the French at the Battle of Bouvines (Northern France). October 1214 John returns to England following the failure of his military campaign in France that he had spent years planning. 4 March 1215 Facing baronial revolt, John declares his intention to go on crusade to the Holy Land. It is hoped that this will secure support from the Pope against his rebellious barons. 5 May 1215 The barons renounce their fealty (allegiance) to John, and name Robert fitz Walter as their leader. 17 May 1215 The city of London welcomes the rebel barons, dashing John’s hopes for a quick victory and end to the civil war. 10 June 1215 John meets the rebel leaders at Runnymede meadow by the River Thames near Staines. 15 June 1215 King John sets his seal to a draft of Magna Carta, thereby accepting its terms. 19 June 1215 The rebel barons formally make peace with King John, and renew their allegiance. 7 July 1215 The pope excommunicates the barons who have rebelled against their king.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sketch of Southern Slav History
    THE SOUTHERN SLAV LIBRARY-III A SKETCH OF · SOUTHERN SLAV HISTORY LONDON NISBET & CO. LTD~ SERBO-CROAT ORTHOGRAPHY. s = sh in "ship." c = ts in "cats." c = ch in " church." z = j in French "jour." c = ditto (softer). j = y in "your." A SKETCH OF SOUTHERN SLAV HISTORY SOUTHERN Slav, or Jugoslav,* history from the earliest times up to the present day, presents the record of a people who, though stubborn in resistance, are by no means aggressive, and who, notwithstanding the great and exceptional misfortunes that have befallen them, have succeeded in preserving their nation~! individuality, and in asserting themselves as a homogeneous nation full of youth and vitality. In virtue of their geographical position, which makes the Jugoslav lands the most direct link between the East and West-that is to say, between Western, Central, and Southern Europe on the one hand, and the Balkans, the Adriatic, and Asia Minor on the other-these territories have always been the arena of great political rivalries and fierce racial conflicts. Many powerful states, ambitious of conquest, and aspiring towards aggrandizement-Byzantium, Hungary, Turkey, and Venice-have for centuries in turn made countless efforts to break the Jugoslav resistance, which thwarted· their ambitions and desires. Despite apparent temporary success, these efforts have proved virtually fruitless, and have so far failed to bring about the desired result. It is * The Southern Slavs, or Jugoslavs (jug, in Slav, means the south), who include Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, are one and the same people, known under three different names. The territories inhabited by Jugoslavs are the following: the kingdoms of Serbia and Monte­ negro, Bosnia and Hercegovina, Dalmatia with the Dalmatian Archi­ pelago, Croatia and Slavonia with Rieka (Fiume) and Medjumurje, the Drave country in Southern Hungary (Baranja) with Ba~ka and the Banat, Istria with its islands and Trieste, the Slovene lands, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download the Hundred Years War: the English in France 1337
    THE HUNDRED YEARS WAR: THE ENGLISH IN FRANCE 1337-1453 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Desmond Seward | 320 pages | 26 Aug 1999 | Penguin Putnam Inc | 9780140283617 | English | New York, NY, United States The Hundred Years War: the English in France 1337-1453 PDF Book Interestingly, as Seward notes in the foreword, he emphasizes the financial aspects of the war which was an illuminating choice in my opinion. Le Patourel, J. In England, political forces over time came to oppose the costly venture. If the unborn child was male, he would become king; if not, Charles left the choice of his successor to the nobles. I will move on to read more detailed histories of the period. The Worlds of Medieval Europe. Although primarily a dynastic conflict , the war inspired French and English nationalism. Inspired by Joan, the French took several English strongholds on the Loire. In , a treaty was signed between France and Scotland during the reign of Philip the Fair. Jun 19, Rich rated it it was amazing Shelves: history , college. Archived from the original on 23 September A very straightforward, linear account of the Hundred Years' War from a decidedly English-as-protagonists-leaning point of view. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography online ed. This is my story of survival. After all, many of these men and women were pseudo-documented by Shakespeare so there is much grist for the mill. What is undeniable is that for a few months many Frenchmen thought they were fighting a holy war, and the English went in terror of the Maid and her sorceries.
    [Show full text]
  • King John: England, Magna Carta and the Making of a Tyrant, Stephen Church (London: Pan Books, 2015)
    2016 _ III King John: England, Magna Carta and the making of a Tyrant, Stephen Church (London: Pan Books, 2015). Review by: Stephen Donnachie Review: King John: England, Magna Carta and the making of a Tyrant King John: England, Magna Carta and the making of a Tyrant. By Stephen Church. London: Pan Books, 2015. ISBN: 978-1-4472-4195-9. xxxi + 334 pp. £25. he association of King John with tyranny, bad governance, and the abuse of power is an image long accepted of England’s most infamous monarch. John’s negative reputation was one well T known to contemporary chroniclers and avidly seized upon by later writers to villainise his rule. John’s reputation has proceeded him down through the centuries, his crimes deemed inexcusable and his reign viewed as an abysmal failure. Compared to the successes of his illustrious father Henry II, bellicose brother Richard I, and great rival Philip II Augustus of France, John’s achievements have always appeared as shallow victories and he as the least of the “devil’s brood”. Despite his longstanding legend of cruelty more recent works upon John have attempted to rehabilitate him, presenting the image of a complex individual and talented administrator whose abilities and accomplishments are both admirable and praiseworthy. However, these attempts to reform John’s image and to reassess his reign return to his key failures: the loss of Normandy and other continental possessions, the defeat at the battle of Bouvines and short road to rebellion and Magna Carta that followed. Stephen Church in this thoroughly engaging and well written biography does not attempt to dispel the notion of John as a tyrant and cast him in a new light, nor does he seek to provide us with a misunderstood hero or melodramatic villain.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Plantagenet Kings of England [email protected]
    History of the Plantagenet Kings of England [email protected] http://newsummer.com/presentations/Plantagenet Introduction Plantagenet: Pronunciation & Usage Salic Law: "of Salic land no portion of the inheritance shall come to a woman: but the whole inheritance of the land shall come to the male sex." Primogeniture: inheritance moves from eldest son to youngest, with variations Shakespeare's Plantagenet plays The Life and Death of King John Edward III (probably wrote part of it) Richard II Henry IV, Part 1 Henry IV, Part 2 Henry V Henry VI, Part 1 Henry VI, Part 2 Henry VI, Part 3 Richard III Brief assessments The greatest among them: Henry II, Edward I, Edward III The unfulfilled: Richard I, Henry V The worst: John, Edward II, Richard II, Richard III The tragic: Henry VI The Queens Matilda of Scotland, c1080­1118 (Henry I) Empress Matilda, 1102­1167 (Geoffrey Plantagent) Eleanor of Aquitaine, c1122­1204 (Henry II) Isabella of France, c1295­1348 (Edward II) Margaret of Anjou, 1430­1482 (Henry VI) Other key notables Richard de Clare "Strongbow," 1130­1176 William the Marshal, 1st Earl of Pembroke, 1147­1219 Simon de Montfort, 6th Earl of Leicester, c1208­1265 Roger Mortimer, Earl of March, 1287­1330 Henry "Hotspur" Percy, 1364­1403 Richard Neville "The Kingmaker," 1428­1471 Some of the important Battles Hastings (Wm I, 1066): Conquest Lincoln (Stephen, 1141): King Stephen captured Arsuf (Richard I, 1191): Richard defeats Salidin Bouvines (John, 1214): Normandy lost to the French Lincoln, 2nd (Henry III, 1217): Pembroke defeats
    [Show full text]
  • Open Finalthesis Weber Pdf.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES FRACTURED POLITICS: DIPLOMACY, MARRIAGE, AND THE LAST PHASE OF THE HUNDRED YEARS WAR ARIEL WEBER SPRING 2014 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Medieval Studies with honors in Medieval Studies Reviewed and approved* by the following: Benjamin T. Hudson Professor of History and Medieval Studies Thesis Supervisor/Honors Adviser Robert Edwards Professor of English and Comparative Literature Thesis Reader * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT The beginning of the Hundred Years War came about from relentless conflict between France and England, with roots that can be traced the whole way to the 11th century, following the Norman invasion of England. These periods of engagement were the result of English nobles both living in and possessing land in northwest France. In their efforts to prevent further bloodshed, the monarchs began to engage in marriage diplomacy; by sending a young princess to a rival country, the hope would be that her native people would be unwilling to wage war on a royal family that carried their own blood. While this method temporarily succeeded, the tradition would create serious issues of inheritance, and the beginning of the last phase of the Hundred Years War, and the last act of success on the part of the English, the Treaty of Troyes, is the culmination of the efforts of the French kings of the early 14th century to pacify their English neighbors, cousins, and nephews. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Plantagenet Claim to France...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Este Libro Forma Parte Del Acervo De La
    Este libro forma parte del acervo de la Biblioteca Jurídica Virtual del Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM www.juridicas.unam.mx www.bibliojuridica.org LEGAL CULUTRE AND LEGAL TRANSPLANTS SERBIAN REPORT Dušan NIKOLIĆ Introduction. I. Global Context: Convergence of Legal Cultures. 1. Historical Experience. 2. A Multicultural World and Various Legal Cultures. 3. Various Models of Regulation of Social Relations. 4. Convergence of Different Legal Cultures of the World. 5. Globalization of Law: Convergence of Legal Cultures. 6. An Idea: One State - One Law. 7. Another Idea: Civil Society and Post-State Regulations. 8. Current Effect of Democratic Experimentalism: Increasing State Interventionism. II. Serbian Legal Tradition and Foreign Influences. 1. Retrospective: Adopting Legal Models. 2. Retrospective: Adopting Certain Legal Institutes. III. Current trends: The Third Europeanization. Decollectivization, Denatio-nalization, Privatization, Restitution and Codification of law. 1. Two Conceptions of the Europeanization of Law in Europe. 2. Towards a New Serbian Civil Code. IV. Conclusion. V. Epilogue? INTRODUCTION There are very few communities in the world that are entirely isolated from the contemporary flows of the civilized world. Most of the people live in societies that are, more or less, open to exchange of information, goods, services, and capital. In such circumstances, convergence of different legal cultures is inevitable. Certain communities take over legal principles or even entire regulatory models, from other societies. This process has been ongoing from centuries, and until few decades ago it was unilateral. As a rule, legal principles and models have been transplanted from the European (more general: Western) legal tradition. Sometimes it was done voluntarily, but more often it was done under coercion in a form of pure legal colonialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Magna Carta Preparation Materials for Virtual Classroom (KS 3)
    The National Archives Education Service Magna Carta Preparation materials for virtual classroom (KS 3) DL 10/71 Magna Carta Preparation materials for virtual classroom (KS 3) Contents Teacher’s notes 3 Document 1: DL 10/71 4 Magna Carta, 1225 Transcript 1: DL 10/71 5 Magna Carta, 1225 Document 2: C 66/81 6 Written public announcement of the peace terms accepted by King Henry III and the community of the realm, 1264 Transcript 2: C 66/81 7 Written public announcement of the peace terms accepted by King Henry III and the community of the realm, 1264 Document 3: C 53/86 8 Charter confirming the rights set out in Magna Carta, 1300 Transcript 3: C 53/86 9 Charter confirming the rights set out in Magna Carta, 1300 Document 4: C 65/62 10 Charges against King Richard for which he was deposed, 1399 Transcript 4: C 65/62 12 Charges against King Richard for which he was deposed, 1399 Historian’s notes 13 Dr. Matt Phillips provides further background information on Magna Carta 2 Magna Carta Preparation materials for virtual classroom (KS 3) Teacher’s notes Students do not need to do any work in preparation for this virtual classroom. Please do not show students copies of the following documents before the session. However, if there are students who have visual impairments and may have difficulty viewing the screen during the session, please enlarge copies of the documents for them to refer to. This session introduces students to The National Archives and to the history of Magna Carta.
    [Show full text]
  • ~ Center for Interdisciplinary Studies ~ and ~ Institut De La Communication
    ~ Center for Interdisciplinary Studies ~ and ~ Institut de la Communication ~ UNESCO Chair in Cultural Policy and Management Master thesis: Cultural Diplomacy in Serbia – Comparative Analysis of Strategies and Practices of Different Ministries of Culture in Period 2001-2013 Student: Miloš Ćirić, E12/12 Supervisor: Prof. Milena Dragićević-Šešić, PhD Belgrade, September 2013. Table of Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Le résumé .................................................................................................................................. 5 I Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 10 II Theory, Methodology and Hypotheses............................................................................. 14 2.1. Goals and objectives of research ...................................................................................... 18 2.2. Research and conceptual framework ................................................................................ 19 2.3. Main and supporting hypotheses ...................................................................................... 21 III Cultural Diplomacy in Theory and Practice.................................................................. 22 3.1. Conceptual considerations on cultural diplomacy ........................................................... 22 3.2. Relation
    [Show full text]