DOCSLIB.ORG

Red Rock Consulting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Red Rock Consulting RED ROCK CONSULTING PEDOLOGICAL & GEOLOGICAL SOIL SURVEY EC 1394Q US 56 OVER BEAVER RIVER CIMARRON COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 28658(04) Prepared For: Professional Engineering Consultants 10017 S. Pennsylvania Avenue Oklahoma City, OK. 73159 Attention: Mr. Jim Moore, PE Prepared By: Red Rock Consulting, LLC P.O. Box 30591 Edmond, Oklahoma 73003 (405) 562-3328 May 14, 2014 Project No. 14039 RED ROCK CONSULTING May 14, 2014 Professional Engineering Consultants 10017 S. Pennsylvania Avenue Oklahoma City, OK. 73159 Attention: Mr. Jim Moore, PE Re : Pedological & Geological Soil Survey EC 1394Q US 56 over Beaver River Cimarron County, Oklahoma 28658(04) RRC Project No. 14039 Dear Mr. Moore, We are pleased to submit herewith this report entitled "Pedological & Geological Soil Survey, EC 13940, US 56 over Beaver River, Cimarron, County, Oklahoma, 28658(04 )". In an effort to provide a more environmentally friendly service, this report has been printed double-sided on 100% recycled paper. Kristi K. Bumpas, PE, LEED AP James B. Nevels, Jr, PhD, PE Project Engineer Geotechnical Engineering Consultant Oklahoma PE No. 23667 Oklahoma PE No. 9282 PO. BOX 30591 · EDMOND. OK 73003 • 405-562- 3328 • WWW.REDROCKGEO.COM PEDOLOGICAL & GEOLOGICAL SOIL SURVEY EC 1394Q US 56 OVER BEAVER RIVER CIMARRON COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 28658(04) PROJECT NO. 14039 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Authorization ........................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Qualifications ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Proposed Construction ....................................................................................................... 3 2.0 PEDOLOGICAL and GEOLOGICAL SOIL SURVEY .............................................................. 5 2.1 Site Conditions .................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Subsurface Conditions ........................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Field Investigation ............................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Soil Taxonomy .................................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Soil Description ................................................................................................................... 6 2.6 Geologic Statement ............................................................................................................ 7 2.7 Soil Series Station Extents .................................................................................................. 8 3.0 LABORATORY TESTING and TEST DATA RESULTS.......................................................... 9 3.1 Laboratory Test Procedures and Test Results .................................................................... 9 4.0 SHRINKAGE and SWELL FACTORS .................................................................................. 10 4.1 Estimation of Shrinkage and Swell Factors ....................................................................... 10 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................ 11 5.1 Soil Parameter Considerations and Compacted Fill Requirements .................................. 11 5.2 Other Factors .................................................................................................................... 12 5.3 Cut Section Considerations............................................................................................... 12 5.4 Groundwater Observations ............................................................................................... 13 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................... 14 7.0 GENERAL COMMENTS ....................................................................................................... 15 TABLES TABLE 1 – General Comments on the Soil Series Investigated TABLE 2 – Soil Series Taxonomic Class and Comments TABLE 3 – Soil Taxonomy TABLE 4 – Soil Series Station Extents TABLE 5 – Shrinkage/Swell Factors for Earthwork Excavation TABLE 6 – Cut Section Considerations TABLE 7 – Recommended MR for Pavement Design APPENDICES APPENDIX A – General Site Maps APPENDIX B – Web Soil Survey 3.0 APPENDIX C – Soil Taxonomy Statement APPENDIX D – Pedological Soil Logs and Test Data APPENDIX E – Abrasion and Corrosion Rating 2 PEDOLOGICAL & GEOLOGICAL SOIL SURVEY EC 1394Q US 56 OVER BEAVER RIVER CIMARRON COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 28658(04) PROJECT NO. 14039 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Authorization Kristi K. Bumpas, PE LEED AP, President of Red Rock Consulting, LLC, assigned this project to James B. Nevels, Jr, PhD, PE on February 17, 2014. The work was authorized by Professional Engineering Consultants (PEC), PA at the Cherokee Building 4150 S. 100th E. Avenue, Suite 401, Tulsa Ok 74146. The scope of work for the pedological and geological soil survey includes all resilient modulus and supporting data, soil taxonomy and soil descriptions, geologic statement, problem soils, analysis and recommendations. The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site with regards to project earthwork and pavement subgrade construction. The scope did not include any environmental assessment for the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater, or air on or below or around the site. 1.2 Qualifications Mr. James B. Nevels’, Jr, PhD, PE responsibility was limited to selecting the representative soil series sampling locations, logging the soil series descriptions, reviewing the Red Rock Consulting, LLC test data, and preparing the preliminary report. The laboratory processing and testing of the pedological soil samples was conducted by Cobb Engineering Co. at 13801 N. Meridian Avenue in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73134; and the resilient modulus tests were performed by Naji Khoury at 3051 PS Business Center, Woodbridge, VA 22192 for Red Rock Consulting. The field sampling and laboratory testing were performed in general accordance with the current Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) Roadway Design geotechnical specification (June 29, 2011). 1.2 Proposed Construction The project consists of the replacement of the existing six span bridge and approach embankments with a new five span bridge and grade and drain located approximately 8.6 miles southwest of the junction of US 385 and US 56 along US 56 over the Beaver River. The center Pedological& Geological Soil Survey US 56 over Beaver River, Cimarron County, Oklahoma 28658(04) RRC Project No. 14039 May 14, 2014 line for the new alignment grading is along the existing center line of survey of US 56 at approximately the same grade line elevation. The roadway improvement calls for a new 24 foot wide pavement with 8 wide foot shoulders with a minimum 20 foot clear zone. The proposed roadway reconstruction will be made by redirecting traffic onto a shoofly grade to be constructed at a 100 foot offset southeast of the existing alignment. Based on the plan cross‒sections, the shoofly grade will involve cut section grading that intercepts and cuts into the mixed eolin sands, and partly wind reworked alluvial materials, unconsolidated sediments of the Ogallala Formation, and the Dakota Sandstone Formation. The proposed beginning of the project (BOP) is at station 1042+50, and the end of project (EOP) is at station 1055+00 along the existing US 56 centerline. The overall roadway length of the project is 874.50 feet (0.165 miles), and total length of project is 1250.00 feet (0.237 miles). The preliminary design plans were prepared by PEC. Pertinent sheets of the plan set are presented in Appendix A. 4 Pedological& Geological Soil Survey US 56 over Beaver River, Cimarron County, Oklahoma 28658(04) RRC Project No. 14039 May 14, 2014 2.0 PEDOLOGICAL and GEOLOGICAL SOIL SURVEY 2.1 Site Conditions The site of the referenced project is located approximately 8.6 miles southwest of the junction of US 385 and US 56 along US 56 over the Beaver River in Cimarron County, Oklahoma. The general location of the site is shown in Figure 1. The existing US 56 alignment is a 24 foot wide asphalt pavement with 3 foot mixed aggregate and grass shoulders with a varying 100 to 120 foot right of way. The existing alignment is on northeast‒southwest tangent alignment with connecting local roads at each end surveyed project extent. Existing utilities along the proposed alignment consist of the following: a.) overhead electric lines (unidentified) west of station 1035+00 and b.) overhead electric lines (unidentified) crossing the existing alignment at approximately station 1060+66. Additional utilities should be anticipated within the proposed construction areas. The surrounding land along the existing alignment is generally all range land used for cattle grazing, see Figure 2. 2.2 Subsurface Conditions The subsurface conditions throughout this project extent consist of soils developed from alluvial sediments, mixed eolin sands, and partly wind reworked alluvial materials, see Table 1. The geomorphic province at this site is the High Plains which consists of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geohydrology of the Oklahoma Panhandle Beaver, Cimarron And
    GEOHYDROLOGY OF THE OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE, BEAVER, CIMARRON, AND TEXAS COUNTIES By D. l. Hart Jr., G. l. Hoffman, and R. L. Goemaat U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water Resources Investigation 25 -75 Prepared in cooperation with OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD April 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Thomas Kleppe, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY v. E. McKelvey, Director For additional information write to~ U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division 201 N. W. 3rd Street, Room 621 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102 ii CONTENTS Pa,;e No. Factors to convert English units to metric units ..•..................... v Ab s t raet .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. I' of '" " " of .. .. ••• .. of " •, '" 7 I ntroduc t ion. ......•....•............................................... 8 Purpose and scope of investigation 8 Location and general features of the area.••..........•............ 8 Previous investigations .•.......................................... 10 Well-numbering system.•...............................•............ 10 Acknowledgments. .......•......................................... .. 13 Geology. ....•.•....................................................... .. 13 ~ Regional geology ill .. II II II oil II oil It It It "" oil 13 Geologic units and their water-bearing properties 16 Permian System...•.......................•.................... 16 Permian red beds undifferentiated...............•........ 16 Triassic System..•.•.........•...........•.................... 16 Dockt.JIn Group ~ 4 ~ #' ., of ,. '" ., # of ,. ,. .. ". 16 Jurassic
    [Show full text]
  • Range Extension Into Western Oklahoma of the White Sucker, Castostomus Commersoni (Lacepede)
    51 Range Extension into Western Oklahoma of the White Sucker, Castostomus commersoni (Lacepede) Jimmie Pigg and Randy Parham Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73124 Received: 1990 November 3 The white sucker, Castostomus commersoni, ranges from the Arctic Circle south to New Mexico and Georgia, and occurs in a wide variety of habitats (1). This species previously had been collected only from the Ozarkian region of Oklahoma (2). However, a range map provided by Lee et al. (1) suggested occurrence of the species in the western tip of the Panhandle. In this paper we report such occurrence. Sublette et al. (3) listed this sucker from two locations in Union County, New Mexico. Union County borders Cimarron County, Oklahoma on the west. One collection came from Cirrumpa Creek (Beaver River) east of Des Maine and the second collection from the Ute River, a tributary of the South Canadian River near Gladstone, New Mexico. In New Mexico this species was native to the Canadian River drainage, but is now more widely distributed because of introductions throughout the state. On 24 September 1988 we collected seven specimens of white sucker from Cirrumpa Creek (Beaver River) 10 km south and 3.3 km east of Wheeless, in Cimarron County (S23, T2N, R1E, CMM), Oklahoma. This site is 7.5 km east of the New Mexico State Line and downstream approximately 72 km from a known location of this sucker in Union County, New Mexico (3). The seven specimens varied in total length from 6.3 cm. to 21.9 cm. Total weight for the seven specimens was 288.6 g, the largest weighing 146.2 g.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Flow in the Beaver–North Canadian River Basin Upstream from Canton Lake, Western Oklahoma
    Prepared in cooperation with the City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Changes in Flow in the Beaver–North Canadian River Basin Upstream From Canton Lake, Western Oklahoma Water-Resources Investigations Report 96–4304 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Wahl, K.L. and Tortorelli, R.L.—Changes in Flow in the Beaver–North Canadian River Basin Upstream From Canton Lake, Western Oklahoma—USGS/WRIR 96–4304 Printed on recycled paper Changes in Flow in the Beaver–North Canadian River Basin Upstream From Canton Lake, Western Oklahoma By Kenneth L. Wahl and Robert L. Tortorelli Prepared in cooperation with the City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Water-Resources Investigations Report 96–4304 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 1997 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 202 NW 66 St., Bldg. 7 Oklahoma City, OK 73116 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Information about water resources in Oklahoma is available on the World Wide Web at http://ok.water.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, it contains copyrighted materials that are noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • (Suckers) in the North Canadian River and Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma
    7 Occurrences of Catostomid Fishes (Suckers) in the North Canadian River and Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma Jimmie Pigg and Robert Gibbs Environmental Laboratory Service, Oklahoma State Department of Environmental Quality, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73117-1212. Received: 1994 Aug 17; Revised: 1995 Jan 27 A 17-year survey of the North Canadian (Beaver) River, Lake Eufaula, and the Canadian River below Lake Eufaula by the Oklahoma State Health Department between 1976 and 1992 produced seven species of catostomid fishes. During a review of historical fish collections, we found two additional sucker species, for a total of nine catostomids from the drainage. The new species were the lake chubsucker, Erimyzon sucetta, and the white sucker, Catostomus commersoni. Two species may have disappeared from the drainage: the spotted sucker, Minytrema melanops, and the golden redhorse, Moxostoma erythrurum. Eight of the nine species occurred primarily downstream from Oklahoma City. The white sucker was the only species limited to headwater sections of the river. The river carpsucker was the only sucker distributed throughout the system. INTRODUCTION In this paper, we describe the distribution and abundance of catostomid fishes in the North Canadian River Basin in Oklahoma. Very little is known of the long-term trends in the abundance of native stream fishes in Oklahoma. Because of human influences on Oklahoma streams, especially those of the North Canadian River basin, fish populations have been heavily affected by human-made disturbances. Using data from a long-term survey and reviews of historical fish collections, we attempted to identify changes in the abundance of catostomid fishes in the North Canadian drainage between 1921 and 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver-North Canadian River Alluvial Aquifer Study
    Prepared in cooperation with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Hydrogeological Framework, Numerical Simulation of Groundwater Flow, and Effects of Projected Water Use and Drought for the Beaver-North Canadian River Alluvial Aquifer, Northwestern Oklahoma Beaver-North Canadian River alluvial aquifer Area enlarged OKLAHOMA Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5183 Version 1.1, February 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover: Top, Canton Lake. Photo by Kevin Smith, U.S. Geological Survey Oklahoma Water Science Center. Bottom, Canton Lake. Photo by Derek Ryter, U.S. Geological Survey Oklahoma Water Science Center. Back cover: Top, Photo by Kevin Smith, U.S. Geological Survey Oklahoma Water Science Center. Bottom, Photo by Kevin Smith, U.S. Geological Survey Oklahoma Water Science Center. Hydrogeological Framework, Numerical Simulation of Groundwater Flow, and Effects of Projected Water Use and Drought for the Beaver-North Canadian River Alluvial Aquifer, Northwestern Oklahoma By Derek W. Ryter and Jessica S. Correll Prepared in cooperation with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5183 Version 1.1, February 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia First release: 2016 Revised: February 2016 (ver. 1.1) For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for Disposal of a Portion of the Mcfarland Ranch Unit, Beaver County, Oklahoma
    Environmental Assessment for Disposal of a Portion of the McFarland Ranch Unit, Beaver County, Oklahoma 27 November 2018 Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Need for Action 2 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 Background 2 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action 5 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES 7 2.1 No Action Alternative 7 2.2 Proposed Action Alternative 7 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 8 3.1 Water Resources, Including Floodplains 9 3.2 Vegetation 11 3.3 Wildlife and Species of Greatest Conservation Need 15 3.4 Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species 18 3.5 Cultural and Historic Resources 20 3.6 Land Use 21 3.7 Local Socioeconomic Factors 22 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 22 4.1 Water Resources, Including Floodplains 22 4.2 Vegetation 23 4.3 Wildlife and Species of Greatest Conservation Need 23 4.4 Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species 26 4.5 Cultural and Historic Resources 28 4.6 Land Use 288 4.7 Local Socioeconomic Factors 29 5.0 Public Comments 29 6.0 List of Preparers 29 7.0 References Cited 31 Appendix A: Quit Claim Deed and Federal Property Proposed for Transfer 33 Appendix B: Agreement Documents for Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act 35 1 1 Introduction and Need for Action 1.1 Introduction The Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation (ODWC), in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) to assess the potential effects to physical, biological, and cultural resources and socioeconomic conditions which may result from the disposal of a 623.58-acre portion of the Beaver River Wildlife Management Area (BRWMA), Beaver County, Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Survey of Historic Barns in Northwestern Oklahoma
    Thematic Survey of Historic Barns in Northwestern Oklahoma Alfalfa, Beaver, Cimarron, Ellis, Garfield, Grant, Harper, Kay, Major, Noble, Texas, Woods, and Woodward Counties Prepared for: OKLAHOMA HISTORICAL SOCIETY State Historic Preservation Office Oklahoma History Center 800 Nazih Zuhdi Drive Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105-7914 Prepared by: Brad A. Bays, Ph.D. Department of Geography 337 Murray Hall Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-4073 1 Acknowledgment of Support The activity that is the subject of [type of publication] has been financed [in part/entirely] with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. (Note that only relevant portions of the required statement need to be applied and should be used as appropriate depending on the content of the publications; e.g., if there are no commercial products, then that part of the statement can be omitted.) Nondiscrimination Statement This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act or 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity National Park Service 1849 C Street, N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • LIFE HISTORY and DISTRIBUTION of the ARKANSAS RIVER SHINER in OKLAHOMA PROJECT TITLE: Status of Threatened and Endangered Fishes in Oklahoma
    W 2800.7 E56s no.E-8-1 1989/91 c.3 ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OKLAHOMA o FEDERAL AID PROJECT E-8 STATUS OF THREATENED AND ENDANGERED FISHES IN OKLAHOMA JOB 1 LIFE HISTORY AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ARKANSAS RIVER SHINER IN OKLAHOMA PROJECT TITLE: status of Threatened and Endangered Fishes in Oklahoma STUDY TITLE: Life History and Distribution of the Arkansas River Shiner in Oklahoma August of that year were extremely low compared with records from those sites as far back as the 1930s. There lS no evidence that the species has been adversely affected by bait harvesting or changes in salinity or turbidity. I. OBJECTIVE: Determine the current status of the Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) in Oklahoma by (1) intensively sampling all areas of known historic occurrence, (2) analyzing flow and salinity records from U.S. Geological Survey data for possible correlates of abundance and distribution, and (3) evaluating a backlog of uncatalogued fishes collected within the range of the shiner and housed at Oklahoma state University. II. INTRODUCTION: The Arkansas River shiner, Notropis girardi, was first discovered in 1926 in the Cimarron River, northwest of Kenton in cimarron County, Oklahoma (Hubbs and Ortenburger 1929). It is a small, pallid shiner with mature adults ranging in size from 25-45 mm SL (Gilbert 1980). The species is a member of the small subgenus Alburnops, which also includes lie bairdi, lie potteri, and lie blennius among Oklahoma fishes (Mayden 1989). The shiner was at one time widespread and abundant in the Arkansas River and its major tributaries. These tributaries include the Cimarron, North Canadian and South Canadian rivers which flow through southwestern Kansas, southeastern Colorado, northeastern New Mexico, the panhandle of Texas, the northern half of Oklahoma, and western Arkansas (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Speckled Chub in the Arkansas River Basin
    W 2800.7 E56s no.E-8-3 1991/93 c.3 OKLAHOMA (} STATE: OKLAHOMA PROJECTNUMBER: E-8 PROJECT TITLE: Status of Threatened and Endangered Fishes in Oklahoma STUDY TITLE: Status of the speckled chub in the Arkansas River Basin PERIOD COVERED: 1 September 1991 through 31 August 1993 OBJECTIVE NUMBER: ~ JOB NUMBER: ~ ABSTRACT From 1991 to 1993, we made 223 seine collections at 159 sites to determine the distributional status of the speckled chub in the Arkansas River Basin. A total of 151 speckled chubs were taken in 25 collections at 22 sites. Populations were extant in the Arkansas River in Kansas and Oklahoma, the Cimarron River in Oklahoma, the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River downstream from Great Salt Plains Reservoir in Oklahoma, and the South Fork of the Ninnescah River in Kansas. The species appears extirpated from the Arkansas River in Arkansas and Colorado, the North Canadian and Deep Fork rivers in Oklahoma, the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River upstream of Great Salt Plains Reservoir in Kansas and in Oklahoma, and the South Canadian River from Meredith Reservoir in the Texas Panhandle to Eufaula Reservoir in eastern Oklahoma. The speckled chub has disappeared from about 75% of its former range in the Arkansas River Basin. Stream flow alterations due to reservoir construction and irrigation appear to be responsible for the decline of the species. I. OBJECTIVE: Determine the current status of Arkansas River populations of the speckled chub Macrhybopsis ( = Hybopsis) aestivalis by (1) intensively sampling areas of known historic occurrence and (2) using museum records to document any trends of change in abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Planning Region Report: Panhandle
    The objective of the Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan is to ensure a dependable water supply for all Oklahomans through integrated and coordinated water resources planning by providing the information necessary for water providers, policy-makers, and end users to make informed decisions concerning the use and management of Oklahoma’s water resources. This study, managed and executed by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board under its authority to update the Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan, was funded jointly through monies generously provided by the Oklahoma State Legislature and the federal government through cooperative agreements with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Bureau of Reclamation. The online version of this 2012 OCWP Watershed Planning Region Report (Version 1.1) includes figures that have been updated since distribution of the original printed version. Revisions herein primarily pertain to the seasonality (i.e., the percent of total annual demand distributed by month) of Crop Irrigation demand. While the annual water demand remains unchanged, the timing and magnitude of projected gaps and depletions have been modified in some basins. The online version may also include other additional or updated data and information since the original version was printed. Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan Panhandle Watershed Planning Region Contents Introduction . 1 Water Supply Options . .30 Basin Summaries and Data & Analysis . 35 Regional Overview . 1 Limitations Analysis . 30 Basin 52 . 35 Panhandle Regional Summary . 2 Primary Options . 30 Basin 53 . 45 Synopsis . 2 Demand Management . 30 Basin 54 . 55 Water Resources & Limitations . 2 Out-of-Basin Supplies . 30 Basin 55 . 65 Water Supply Options . 4 Reservoir Use .
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5134
    Prepared in cooperation with the Oklahoma Department of Transportation Methods for Estimating the Magnitude and Frequency of Peak Streamflows at Ungaged Sites In and Near the Oklahoma Panhandle Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5134 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover, Windmill and livestock supply well in the High Plains aquifer area, south of Hooker, Oklahoma (photograph by S. Jerrod Smith, July 28, 2015). Back cover, Windmill and livestock pen in the Oklahoma Panhandle near Boise City, Oklahoma (photograph by William J. Andrews, February 2004). Methods for Estimating the Magnitude and Frequency of Peak Streamflows at Ungaged Sites In and Near the Oklahoma Panhandle By S. Jerrod Smith, Jason M. Lewis, and Grant M. Graves Prepared in cooperation with the Oklahoma Department of Transportation Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5134 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Flow in the Upper North Canadian River Basin of Western
    Transactions on Ecology and the Environment vol 50, © 2001 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 Changes in flow in the upper North Canadian River basin of western Oklahoma, pre-development to 2000 K.L. Wahl US. Geological Survey, Lakewood, Colorado, USA Abstract Water levels have declined in the southern part of the High Plains aquifer of the central USA since the mid-1960s in response to extensive irrigation development. The North Canadian River originates in western Oklahoma, and most of the basin is underlain by the High Plains aquifer. Average river flow in the headwaters near Guymon, Oklahoma, has decreased fiom about 0.9 m3/s before 1970 to near zero at present. Canton Lake, on the North Canadian River near Seiling, about 250 km downstream from Guymon, is a source of water supply for Oklahoma City. Precipitation data and streamflow data for gages upstream from Canton Lake were divided into an "early" period ending in 1971 and a "recent" period that begins in 1978. The early period represents conditions before ground-water levels had declined appreciably in the High Plains aquifer, and the recent period reflects the current condition, including the effects of storage reservoirs. Tests for trend and comparisons of flows between the early and recent periods show that the total annual volume of flow and the magnitudes of instantaneous annual peak discharges measured at most locations in the North Canadian River basin have decreased. Precipitation records for the area, however, show no corresponding changes. The decreases in average annual flow, expressed as a percentage of the average flows for the early period, ranged from 91 percent near Guymon to 37 percent near Canton Lake.
    [Show full text]