41ST ANNUAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MOTORCYCLE TEST AND EVALUATION PROGRAM MOTOCYCLE MODEL YEAR 2016

Jim McDonnell, SHERIFF TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction…………………………………………………………………. 3

Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………. 4

Evaluation Protocol…………………………………………………………. 6

Motorcycle Specifications…………………………………………………… 12

Basic Motorcycle Patterns…………………………………………………… 18

32 Lap High Speed Vehicle Evaluation…………………………………….. 21

Pursuit Course Evaluation…………………………………………………... 27

Brake Evaluation……………………………………………………………. 33

Ergonomics Evaluation……………………………………………………… 37

Acceleration Evaluation…………………………………………………….. 53

Fuel Efficiency Evaluation…………………………………………………. 55

Heat Evaluation……………………………………………………………... 56

Sound Level Evaluation (db meter test)…………………………………….. 60

Communication Evaluation…………………………………………………. 62

INTRODUCTION

The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department first implemented its police vehicle testing program in 1974, and mo- torcycle testing in 2008. Since that time, our Department has become nationally recognized as a major source of in- formation relative to police vehicles and their use.

This year’s motorcycle evaluation was conducted October 20th – 23th, 2015 by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s De- partment.

All major manufacturers of police motorcycles were invited to participate. BMW, Harley Davidson, Honda and Victory each submitted motorcycles for evaluation. The motorcycles submitted were:

*2015 Honda ST 1300-PA *2015 BMW R 1200 RT-P *2016 Harley-Davidson Road King *2016 Victory Commander 1 *2016 Harley-Davidson Electra Glide

All of the motorcycles submitted completed the test satisfactorily.

The testing process is designed to address the law enforcement officer’s operational requirements in terms of motorcy- cle performance, safety, and comfort. The fleet maintenance interest is addressed by performing an extensive mechani- cal evaluation on each motorcycle submitted.

Each test is designed and executed to simulate actual field use conditions as closely as possible. Law enforcement mo- torcycle personnel conduct the evaluations on city streets, freeways, and the performance track.

This book is not intended as a recommendation for any specific motorcycle contained within, nor is it designed to rank the motorcycles in any order. Our motorcycle testing program is conducted in order to accomplish two primary goals. To provide law enforcement agencies with the data necessary to assist those in the motorcycle selection process, and to provide the various motorcycle manufacturers with the input necessary to better meet the needs of law enforcement.

We recognize the fact that individual agency needs can be influenced by cost, operational considerations and other factors. As such, interpretation of test results is the responsibility of each agency, and should be made based upon that agency’s needs.

It is our goal to provide law enforcement agencies with the information they require to successfully evaluate and se- lect the right motorcycle for their needs. We believe that we have accomplished that goal.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Fleet Management Bureau would like to thank all those who contributed their time and efforts in making this year’s test a success.

Motorcycle Test Track Riders

Dep. Shawn Bryant LASD Ofc. Brian. Thompson LAPD Dep. Jeffery Houle LASD Ofc. Sunti Singhanate LAPD Dep. M. Sepulveda LASD Dep. M. Marshall LASD

Motorcycle Manufactures BMW Police Motorcycles Harley Davidson Police Motorcycles Huntington Beach Honda Police Motorcycles Victory Police Motorcycles

Support Personnel Max Thomson (Test Director) AERO Bureau Hiroshi Aramaki (Test Manager) LASD Food Services Rochelle Kidd (Vendor Coordinator) LASD Print Shop Stephen Adebanjo (CFMB) LASD Sign Shop Juan Amaya (FSB) LASD Video Production Unit Yolanda Gomez (CFMB) LASD Web Development Unit Guadalupe La Voie (CFMB) Vincent Santiago (Penske) Kalila Lujan (CFMB) Bruce Wheeler (Penske) Lorena Sigala (CFMB) Bob Yip (Penske) Gina Spencer (CFMB) Dep. Jeff Tesdahl (EOB)

Vehicle Evaluation Team

Ergonomic Drivers Communication Noise Shawn Bryant Richard Santivong, ECT Supervisor Jeff Houle Joe Nassar, ECT

We would like to give a special thanks to the Auto Club Speedway staff for helping to make this event possible.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (Continued)

The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Fleet Management Bureau would like to thank the following companies for their participation and continued support of the LASD Vehicle Test vendor expo.

Air-Wave Communications Huntington Beach Honda BMW Motorrad USA Lehr Auto Electric Chevrolet Link Engineering Cop Car Graphics Pro-Gard Products, LLC Crossco/Code 3 Products Raceway Ford DuraTech USA, Inc. Raybestos Factory Motor Parts Setina Manfacturing Company Inc. Federal Signal T-3 Motion Fiat Chrysler Automobiles Tactical Command Ford Motor Company Troy Products Getac West Coast Lights & Sirens Havis Inc. Westin Public Harley Davidson Motor Company Whelen Hint Mounts Victory Police Motorcycles 10-8 Retrofit Inc.

Vehicle Test Sponsor Federal Signal McPeek Dodge of Anaheim Setina Manufacturing Whelen Manufactured

MOTORCYCLE EVALUATION PROTOCOL 32 LAP HIGH-SPEED COURSE TEST RIDER'S SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION

This evaluation is conducted on a high-speed riding course. It is designed to evaluate, identify and eliminate the obvious unacceptable motorcycles (i.e., those motorcycles that are demonstrably unstable or otherwise exhibit unsafe characteris- tics).

For this evaluation, four riders are utilized for each motorcycle. Each rider completes eight laps around our 1.46 mile test track at the Auto Club Speedway in Fontana, for a total of 32 timed laps. Lap timing is via a GPS based Race Logic “Drift Box 02” with a “Video VBOX” Data logger” utilized for secondary lap timing. Both Data logger units are mounted on the motorcycle. The fastest and the slowest lap times are eliminated, the remaining six lap times are averaged. The average time and speed are recorded next to the rider’s name.

Four Emergency Vehicle Operations Center motorcycle training instructors, two each from the Los Angeles County Sher- iff’s Department and Los Angeles Police Department, share the riding and evaluation of these motorcycles.

At the conclusion of the preliminary handling portion of the evaluation, each rider completes a "Rider’s Subjective Evalua- tion" form. If the motorcycle is judged unacceptable in this preliminary review, it is rejected and not subjected to further evaluation.

PURSUIT COURSE

This evaluation is for motorcycles identified by the manufacturer as intended for law enforcement use. This evaluation is conducted on a closed 2.6 mile city street course which closely represents the environment most urban law enforcement agencies must contend with. The course has several straight-a-ways and consists of multiple right and left turns and obsta- cles in the roadway.

This is the final track evaluation, and the manufacturers, if they so choose, are allowed to rebuild the motorcycles brake system prior to this portion of the evaluation process.

For this evaluation, two riders are utilized for each motorcycle. Each rider completes two laps around the city or “pursuit” course. Lap timing is via a GPS based “VBOX Datalogger” timing device, mounted on the motorcycle. The combined times of the two laps are recorded next to the rider's name.

BASIC MOTORCYCLE PATTERNS

Five circle patterns will be used to determine each motorcycle’s minimum turning radius. The diameters of the circles will be 20, 19, and 18 feet. The circle pattern will be entered at a speed of 2-3 mph. Once inside the circle, the rider will make three revolutions in one direction, exit the circle and make three more revolutions in the opposite direction. The circle pattern will be ridden in first gear.

Each motorcycle will be ridden in five different 180 degree U-Turn patterns. The diameters of the U-Turns will be 20, 19, 18, 17, and 16 feet. The U-Turn will be entered at a speed of 2-3 mph in first gear. The rider will fully turn the handlebars and lean the motorcycle as necessary to complete the turn. This is done in both directions.

The 30 mph cone weave consists of seven sets of three cones each, alternately offset from a center line at 36 foot inter- vals. The rider will approach the pattern from a sufficient distance to establish and maintain a speed of 30 mph. Using counter steering, the rider will weave the motorcycle around the seven sets of cones maintaining 30 mph, plus or minus 2 mph. The 30 mph cone weave represents steering or negotiating around debris or other hazards on the roadway.

The Short Cone Weave pattern utilizes eight single cones placed in a straight line at various distances. The cones will be placed at 11, 10 ½, and 10 foot intervals measured from cone center to cone center. The rider will negotiate the cone weave at about 1-2 mph in first gear, utilizing the rear brake as needed. Lock-to-lock turns will be used to suc- cessfully ride the course. This exercise represents typical motorcycle maneuverability used in slow-speed enforcement riding.

All of the Basic Motorcycle Pattern Evaluation protocols will be conducted by all four riders.

ACCELERATION PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

This evaluation is designed to measure motorcycle performance and control in terms of acceleration, including speed and time elapsed at the quarter mile. Although the top speed is not recorded, a minimum speed of 100 mph is generally obtained to satisfy the requirements for high-speed law enforcement patrol. Special attention will be paid to overall ac- celeration, stability, loss of rear wheel traction, and whether or not the front wheel lifts off the ground uncontrollably. Three runs will be made with each motorcycle. The results will be averaged.

All of the information gathered during the acceleration evaluation is gathered using a RaceLogic Drift box 02 Data- logger”. The “Datalogger” is a GPS based measuring device. This electronic device measures distance, time and speed.

BRAKE EVALUATION

This evaluation procedure measures the braking response and efficiency of the motorcycle. There are three different brake evaluations: A hard braking evaluation, a transitional braking evaluation from a dry to a wet surface, and a transi- tional braking evaluation from a smooth surface to a sandy surface.

Stopping distance is recorded electronically via a GPS based VBOX Datalogger.

The hard brake evaluation is conducted by first accelerating the motorcycle to 80 MPH, then decelerating to a stop, main- taining an average deceleration rate of 22 feet per second. This procedure is repeated three additional times. The motor- cycle is then immediately accelerated to 60 mph and then stopped as quickly as possible, simulating a panic stop. That stopping distance is measured and recorded.

During the dry/wet braking evaluation, the motorcycle will be accelerated to 40 mph, and at a predetermined position, the brakes will be applied. The entire brake application will begin on a dry roadway surface, immediately transitioning onto a wet roadway surface while bringing the motorcycle to a full stop. Controllability of the motorcycle and its ABS operation will be evaluated.

During the debris field braking evaluation, the motorcycle will be accelerated to 40 mph, and at a predetermined position, the brakes will be applied. The entire brake application will take place on a smooth roadway surface, immediately transi- tioning to a roadway strewn with sand and gravel while bringing the motorcycle to a full stop. Controllability of the motor- cycle and its ABS operation will be evaluated.

If a brake malfunction is experienced (i.e., severe brake fading), an effort is made to detect the cause of the brake failure. If it is decided that the failure is inherent in the engineering of the brake system of the motorcycle, the evaluation is discontin- ued and the motorcycle is disqualified from further evaluation. If the failure is associated with a correctable situation, it is corrected and the evaluation is run again. The defect and any remedial action taken are noted in the evaluation results.

ERGONOMICS & RIDEABILITY EVALUATION 157 MILE RIDE

This portion evaluates the fuel efficiency and ergonomics of the motorcycle during extended field operations. It is de- signed to simulate the types of situations that an officer may encounter during an eight hour shift. Each motorcycle is driv- en four times through a 157 mile loop, one loop completed by each of the four EVOC riders. The loop covers 33 miles of city streets, 75 miles of California freeways, 20 miles of coastal highway, and 29 miles of mountain canyons. No attempt is made to "baby" the motorcycle through the loop, and hard acceleration starts are avoided.

During the ride-ability evaluation, a minimum of ten simulated traffic stops will be performed while on city streets. The rider will be required to properly position the motorcycle in a safe traffic enforcement position, dismount the motorcycle, pause for a minimum of two minutes per stop, remount the motorcycle, and accelerate into traffic.

The numerical results of the evaluation are recorded and then averaged between the four riders. This average is then record- ed as the final result of this portion of the evaluation. Each rider will also submit a subjective evaluation of each motorcycle at the end of the ride.

The fuel efficiency evaluation is an attempt to estimate MPG (miles per gallon) based on actual riding conditions. It is the average gas usage of all four riders, for all four loops.

This subjective evaluation is a rating of human factors done individually and independently by all four riders. The ratings are averaged to minimize personal prejudices that individuals may have for or against any given motorcycle. This evalua- tion rates each motorcycle comparatively for its general suitability and efficiency for patrol operations.

HEAT EVALUATION

The heat evaluation is a "PASS-FAIL" scenario and is based on manufacturer’s allowable operating temperatures.

Heat from each engine component is measured by means of a digital thermometer with a bi- metallic probe and infrared heat gun at the conclusion of the 32 high-speed laps. This process is accomplished in the following manner:

1. Transmission Fluid The probe is inserted into the transmission via the oil fill hole. 2. Engine Oil The probe is inserted into the engine case via the oil fill hole, if accessible. 3. Radiator Coolant Temperature is measured via the infrared heat gun aimed below the top radiator tank.

SOUND LEVEL EVALUATION

The sound level evaluation measures the sound levels of the motorcycle at different speeds. This evaluation is conduct- ed at 40 mph, 60 mph, 80 mph, and while accelerating from 0 to 80 mph. The dB ratings are recorded with an EXTECH digital sound level meter. The sound level meter’s microphone is mounted at the riders shoulder level, approximately 6 inches from his ear. During the fixed speed portion of the evaluation, the rider will accelerate to the identified speed, and after attaining that speed, will turn on the EXTECH meter and record the result. During the acceleration portion of the evaluation, the meter will be turned on, and the motorcycle will be accelerated to 80 mph. The meter will record the highest dB rating achieved during the entire acceleration of the motorcycle.

E

MOTORCYCLE SPECIFICATIONS

2015 HONDA ST 1300-P

Vehicle Description: Full size, Sport Touring, Police Package Type: 1261cc liquid cooled 90 degree V-4 and : 78mm x 66mm : 10.8:1 Valve Train: DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder Carburetor / Fuel Injection: PGM-FI with automatic enricher circuit Ignition: Computer Controlled digital with three dimensional mapping and electronic advance Horsepower: 125 bhp @ 8000 rpm Torque: 85 ft-lb @ 6000 rpm Final Drive (shaft, chain, belt): Shaft Dry Weight: 679 lbs. Alternator Output: 660 watt, high output Battery: Odyssey P.C. 545 Gel Battery with 6 Amp Battery Charger Transmission: Five speed Clutch: 8 plate wet, hydraulic Suspension: Front: 45mm HMAS cartridge fork, 4.6 inches of travel Rear: HMAS gas-charged single shock, 4.8 inches of travel Brakes: Front: Dual full floating 310mm floating front discs w/ABS Rear: Single 316mm rear disc w/ABS Tires: Fr - 120/70ZR-18 Rr - 170/60ZR-17 Wheels: 3 spoke U-section cast aluminum Wheelbase: 58.7 inches Rake: 26.0 degree Trail: 98mm / 3.9 inches Fuel Tank Capacity: 7.7 gallons EPA Fuel Mileage: Seat Height: 31.1 inches (+/- 0.6 inches) Adjustments: 3 positions Windscreen: Adjustable / Fixed: Adjustable, electric, 7.4 inches & 13 degrees adjustability Foot peg / Floorboard Position: Foot Peg Saddlebag Storage Capacity: 35 liters each, side opening, detachable

MOTORCYCLE SPECIFICATIONS

2015 BMW POLICE MOTORCYCLE R1200 RT-P

Vehicle Description: Full size Police Package Motorcycle Engine Type: 1170cc air/oil cooled, 2 cylinders, Horizontally-Opposed Bore and Stroke: 101mm x 73mm Compression Ratio: 12.5:1 Valve Train: 4 valves per cylinder, Dual Overhead cam Carburetor / Fuel Injection: Electronic fuel injection Ignition: Electronic engine management BMS-X Horsepower: 125hp Torque: 92ft/lb. Final Drive (shaft, chain, belt): Shaft Wet Weight: Approximately 650 lbs. Alternator Output: 540 watt, Battery: Two 12V 16ah AGM maintenance free batteries Transmission: Constant Mesh 6 speed with helical cut gears Clutch: 8 disc wet slipper, self-energizing clutch Suspension: Front: BMW Telelever, 4.7 inches of travel Rear: BMW EVO paralever, 5.4 inches of travel Brakes: BMW Motorad Integral ABS system w/independent rear wheel control Front: Hydraulically actuated twin disc radial 320mm diameter Rear: Hydraulically actuated single disc, 276mm diameter Tires: Fr - 120/70ZR-17 Rr - 180/55ZR-17 Wheels: Cast aluminum with side mounted inflation valves, tire pressure monitoring Wheelbase: 58.4 inches Fork Fork Angle: 63.4 degrees Trail: 4.6 inches Fuel Tank Capacity: 6.6 gallons with one gallon reserve EPA Fuel Mileage: 60 hwy / 44 city Seat Height: Std.: 31.7/32.5 Optional: High 32.7/33.5 Low29.9/30.7 Adjustments: Yes, Three seat heights available Windscreen: Yes Adjustable / Fixed: Adjustable, electric Foot peg / Floorboard Position: Foot Peg Saddlebag Storage Capacity: 23 liters each, front hinged, top opening

MOTORCYCLE SPECIFICATIONS

2016 HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLHP ROAD KING

Vehicle Description: 2016 FLHP Police Road King Engine Type: 4 stroke, 2 cylinder, 1690CC Bore and Stroke: 3.875 in. x 4.375 in. Compression Ratio: 9.7: 1 Valve Train: Pushrod operated, overhead valves with hydraulic self-adjusting lifters Carburetor / Fuel Injection: Electronic Sequential Port Fuel Injection Ignition: Electronic Horsepower: N/A Torque :104.7 ft-lb @ 3250 rpm Final Drive (shaft, chain, belt): Drive belt Dry Weight: 786 lbs. Alternator Output: 50amps Battery: 12V / 28 Ahr, 405 CCA, maintenance free Transmission: 6 speed Cruise Drive Constant mesh Clutch: Dry/Wet: Cable Actuated, Wet, 9 plate Suspension, Front: 49 mm telescopic Rear: Swing arm with adjustable air shocks Brakes: Reflex™ Electronically linked brakes with ABS Front: Hydraulic dual disc with floating rotors and 32mm 4 piston calipers Rear: Hydraulic single disc with fixed rotor and 32mm 4 piston caliper Tires: Fr – BW130/80B17 65H Rr – BW180/65B16 81H Wheels: Impeller™ Cast aluminum Wheelbase: 64 inches Rake: 26 degrees Fork Angle29.25 degrees Trail: 6.7 inches Fuel Tank Capacity: 6 gallons EPA Fuel Mileage: Combined City/HWY 42mpg Seat Height: 27.3 in. laden Adjustments: Yes Windscreen: Fixed detachable Polycarbonate Foot peg / Floorboard Position: Pivoting Floorboard Saddlebag Storage Capacity: Approx. 2000 cubic inches

MOTORCYCLE SPECIFICATIONS

2016 VICTORY COMMANDER 1

Vehicle Description: 2016 CROSS COUNTRY COMMANDER 1 Engine Type: 1731cc Overhead, cam, 106 oil/air cooled v-twin 4 stroke, w/oil cooler Bore and Stroke: 101mm x 108mm Compression Ratio: 9.4:1 Valve Train: Overhead cams shafts, w/4 valves per cylinder, self adjusting cam chains, hydraulic lifters Carburetor / Fuel Injection: Electronic fuel injection Ignition: Electronic Ignition System Horsepower: 97HP Torque: 113 ft-lb @ 2,700 rpm Final Drive (shaft, chain, belt): Carbon fiber reinforced reinforced belt Dry Weight: 855 lbs Alternator Output: 50 amp Battery: 18 amp/hour, 12 volt, 270cca Transmission: Wet, gear drive w/torque compensator 1.5:1 Clutch: Wet, Multi-plate Suspension, Front: inverted cartridge telescopic fork Rear: Link mono air adjustable shock. Brakes: Independent ABS Front: Dual 300mm floating rotors w/4-piston calipers Rear: Single 300mm floating rotor w/2-piston calipers Tires: Fr – Dunlop Elite 3 130/70R18 Rr – Dunlop Elite 3 180/60R16 Wheels: Cast aluminum rims Wheelbase: 65.7 inches Rake: 29.0 degrees Trail: 5.6 inches Fuel Tank Capacity: 5.8 gallons EPA Fuel Mileage: city 42, highway 47, combined 44.5 Seat Height: 26.25 inches Adjustments: Yes seat 25.25 Windscreen: Yes Adjustable / Fixed: Adjustable Foot Peg / Floorboard Position: Floor boards forward, controls adjustable forward & back Saddlebag Storage Capacity: 21 gallon w/ 560lbs of load capacity

MOTORCYCLE SPECIFICATIONS

2016 HARLEY-DAVIDSON ELECTRA GLIDE

Vehicle Description: 2016 FLHTP Police Electra Glide Engine Type: 4 stroke, 2 cylinder, 1690CC Bore and Stroke: 3.875 in. x 4.375 in. Compression Ratio: 9.7: 1 Valve Train: Pushrod operated, overhead valves with hydraulic self-adjusting lifters Carburetor / Fuel Injection: Electronic Sequential Port Fuel Injection Ignition: Electronic Horsepower: N/A Torque :104 ft-lb @ 3250 rpm Final Drive (shaft, chain, belt): Drive belt Dry Weight: 791 lbs. Alternator Output: 50amps Battery: 12V / 28Ah, 405CCA, maintenance free Transmission: 6-speed Cruise Drive Constant mesh Clutch: Hydraulically actuated, wet, 9-plate Suspension, Front: Telescopic fork, 49mm Rear: Swing arm with adjustable air shocks Brakes: Reflex™ Electronically linked brakes with ABS Front: Hydraulic dual disc with floating rotors and 32mm 4 piston calipers Rear: Hydraulic single disc with fixed rotor and 32mm 4 piston caliper Tires: Fr – BW130/80B17 65H Rr – BW180/65B16 81H Wheels: Impeller™ Cast aluminum Wheelbase: 64 inches Rake: 26 degrees Trail: 6.7 inches Fuel Tank Capacity: 6 gallons EPA Fuel Mileage: Combined City/HWY 42mpg Seat Height: 27.3 in. laden Adjustments: Yes Windscreen: Yes Foot peg / Floorboard Position: Pivoting Floorboard Saddlebag Storage Capacity: Approx. 2000 cubic inches

MOTORCYCLE

BASIC MOTORCYCLE PATTERNS

2015 HONDA ST1300P

PAT- 20 FT. 19 FT. 18 FT. 17 FT. 16 FT. TERN Circle P P P U-Turn P P P PATTERN 11 FT. 10 ½ FT. 10 FT. 9 ½ FT. Short Cone Weave P P P PATTERN CONSIDERATION RATING** 30 MPH Cone Weave Counter steering effort / Bike Drag P

** Rating Scale – Pass or Fail

2015 BMW R1200RT-P

PAT- 20 FT. 19 FT. 18 FT. 17 FT. 16 FT. TERN Circle P P P U-Turn P P P PATTERN 11 FT. 10 ½ FT. 10 FT. 9 ½ FT. Short Cone Weave P P P PATTERN CONSIDERATION RATING** 30 MPH Cone Weave Counter steering effort / Bike Drag P

** Rating Scale – Pass or Fail

BASIC MOTORCYCLE PATTERNS

2015 HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLHP ROAD KING PATTERN 20 FT. 19 FT. 18 FT. 17 FT. 16 FT. Circle P P P U-Turn P P P PATTERN 11 FT. 10 ½ FT. 10 FT. 9 ½ FT. Short Cone Weave P P P PATTERN CONSIDERATION RATING** 30 MPH Cone Weave Counter steering effort / Bike Drag P

** Rating Scale - Pass or Fail

2016 VICTORY COMMANDER 1 PATTERN 20 FT. 19 FT. 18 FT. 17 FT. 16 FT. Circle P P F U-Turn P P P PATTERN 11 FT. 10 ½ FT. 10 FT. 9 ½ FT. Short Cone Weave P P P PATTERN CONSIDERATION RATING** 30 MPH Cone Weave Counter steering effort / Bike Drag P

** Rating Scale - Pass or Fail

2016 HARLEY-DAVIDSON ELECTRA GLIDE PAT- 20 FT. 19 FT. 18 FT. 17 FT. 16 FT. TERN Circle P P P U-Turn P P F PATTERN 11 FT. 10 ½ FT. 10 FT. 9 ½ FT. Short Cone Weave P P P PATTERN CONSIDERATION RATING** 30 MPH Cone Weave Counter steering effort / Bike Drag P

** Rating Scale – Pass or Fail

LAP HIGH-SPEED MOTORCYCLE DYNAMICS EVALUATION 32 LAP HIGH-SPEED COURSE MOTORCYCLE DYNAMICS EVALUATION

2015 HONDA ST1300P

RIDER LAPS AVG. AVG. TIME SPEED Deputy J. Houle 1 thru 8 1:30.6 57.7 Officer S. Singhanante 9 thru 16 1:30.8 57.7 Deputy M. Sepulveda 17 thru 23 1:35.7 54.9 Officer B. Thompson 24 thru 32 1:35.9 54.4

ITEM RATING** STEERING 9.7 LEAN ANGLE 8.2 SUSPENSION 9.2 BRAKE FADE 9.5 BRAKE PULL 9.7 ABS OPERATION

**Rating Scale 1 – 10 / 1 -Poor / 5 – Average / 10 - Outstanding

RIDDER COMMENTS

Brakes: Brake felt responsive and predictable. Good modulation and feel. Slight fade no- ticed on the last set but still strong. ABS never came into play.

Cornering/Handling: Nice and smooth, great through transition left to right and right to left. However, this bike runs out of lean angle during tight turn causing interference between foot pegs and track. ( foot pegs way too low).

Transmission (Shift Points): Excellent but it could be improved by incorporating gear shift assist.

Engine: The engine is very reliable and smooth, generate a lot of power & torque through the gears

Other: Foot pegs are too low. Foot can get stuck while motorcycle in turns. 32 LAP HIGH-SPEED COURSE MOTORCYCLE DYNAMICS EVALUATION

2015 BMW R1200RT-P

RIDER LAPS AVG. AVG. TIME SPEED Deputy J. Houle 1 thru 8 1:36.6 58.2 Officer S. Singhanante 9 thru 16 1:37.4 57.9 Deputy M. Marshall 17 thru 23 1:37.6 58.4 Officer B. Thompson 24 thru 32 1:39.8 55.3

ITEM RATING** STEERING 9.7 LEAN ANGLE 10 SUSPENSION 9.7 BRAKE FADE 9.5 BRAKE PULL 10 ABS OPERATION 10

**Rating Scale 1 – 10 / 1 -Poor / 5 – Average / 10 - Outstanding

RIDDER COMMENTS

Brakes: Minor brake fade felt toward the end of last set, but the brake is reliable, predicta- ble and consistent. ABS never came into play.

Cornering/Handling: Cornering was tight and smooth, excellent lean angle. The bike re- mained stable throughout cornering.

Transmission (Shift Points): The bike had lots of torque and power throughout the gears. Gears synchronized well with engine output.

Engine: Engine is very predictable and powerful. It generates plenty of power and torque, pulls hard to redline.

Other: Clutch takes a little getting used to.

32 LAP HIGH-SPEED COURSE MOTORCYCLE DYNAMICS EVALUATION

2016 HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLHP ROAD KING

RIDER LAPS AVG. AVG. TIME SPEED Deputy J. Houle 1 thru 8 1:36.6 54.2 Officer S. Singhanante 9 thru 16 1:37.4 53.8 Deputy S. Bryant 17 thru 23 1:37.6 53.9 Officer B. Thompson 24 thru 32 1:39.8 52.5

ITEM RATING** STEERING 8.7 LEAN ANGLE 5.5 SUSPENSION 7.7 BRAKE FADE 9.7 BRAKE PULL 9.0 ABS OPERATION N/A

**Rating Scale 1 – 10 / 1 -Poor / 5 – Average / 10 - Outstanding

RIDDER COMMENTS

Brakes: The brakes were very strong and predictable– stops great! Brake lever little too stiff.

Cornering/Handling: The bike handles and corners well, but it has a limited lean angle that makes it feel unsafe while leaning hard.

Transmission (Shift Points): Shift points provides plenty of torque and power.. However, the shifter has a long throw but they were positive.

Engine: The engine pulls hard and generates plenty of torque, but it lost power as the tem- perature rises.

Other: Throttle twist long pull , limited lean angle, instrument cluster too low and poor windshield visibility.

32 LAP HIGH-SPEED COURSE MOTORCYCLE DYNAMICS EVALUATION

2016 VICTORY COMMANDER 1

RIDER LAPS AVG. AVG. TIME SPEED Deputy J. Houle 1 thru 8 1:38.5 53.3 Officer S. Singhanante 9 thru 16 1:40.9 52.1 Deputy S. Bryant 17 thru 23 1:37.5 53.8 Officer B. Thompson 24 thru 32 1:40.1 52.5

ITEM RATING** STEERING 9.2 LEAN ANGLE 6.2 SUSPENSION 8.5 BRAKE FADE 9.0 BRAKE PULL 8.7 ABS OPERATION N/A

**Rating Scale 1 – 10 / 1 -Poor / 5 – Average / 10 - Outstanding

RIDDER COMMENTS

Brakes: The brakes remained strong, consistent and well modulated throughout the laps. Bike swung side to side during a hard late braking into a corner. Slight fade with hard braking was experienced toward the end of set.

Cornering/Handling: Limited lean angle which makes it really hard to go though turns with- out floor boards hitting the floor. Otherwise, it handled well and accelerated well out of corners.

Transmission (Shift Points): Shift throw was long but it would shift with extra foot pressure (Not a fan of floorboards)

Engine: Smooth with plenty of torque and power

Other: The bike rides comfortable but it exhibits too much throttle twist for “full throttle”.

32 LAP HIGH-SPEED COURSE MOTORCYCLE DYNAMICS EVALUATION

2016 HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLHTP ELECTRA GLIDE

RIDER LAPS AVG. AVG. TIME SPEED Deputy J. Houle 1 thru 8 1:37.5 52.8 Officer S. Singhanante 9 thru 16 1:39.8 52.5 Deputy S. Bryant 17 thru 23 1:38.2 53.4 Officer B. Thompson 24 thru 32 1:40.7 52.0

ITEM RATING** STEERING 8.7 LEAN ANGLE 5.6 SUSPENSION 7.5 BRAKE FADE 9.7 BRAKE PULL 9.2 ABS OPERATION N/A

**Rating Scale 1 – 10 / 1 -Poor / 5 – Average / 10 - Outstanding

RIDDER COMMENTS

Brakes: Brakes are strong, pulled hard and stop very well. Though a very slight brake fade was experienced toward the end of the set, not an issue. Brake hand lever, little too stiff.

Cornering/Handling: Holds lines in the corners. However, lean angle is inadequate which makes it really hard to go though turns without floor boards hitting the floor.

Transmission (Shift Points): Shifts smooth through the gears. No issues with shift points.

Engine: Great engine, it generates a lot of torque and power.

Other: Floorboards are the limiting factor in turn / lean angle.

PURSUIT E

MOTORCYCLE DYNAMICS EVALUATION

PURSUIT COURSE MOTORCYCLE DYNAMICS EVALUATION

2015 HONDA ST1300P

DRIVERS TOTAL TIME AIR /TRACK SPEED B. Thompson 4:31.87 º F / º F 34.4 J. Houle 4:31.44 º F / º F 34.5 Average Time 4:31.65 Average Speed 34.5

ITEM RATING** STEERING 9.5 LEAN ANGLE 8.0 SUSPENSION 8.5 BRAKE FADE 9.0 BRAKE PULL 10 ABS OPERATION N/A

**Rating Scale 1 – 10 / 1 -Poor / 5 – Average / 10 - Outstanding

RIDDER COMMENTS

Brakes: Brakes performed well.

Cornering/Handling: The bike performs well except for low foot peg location causing foot to hit the ground (when on peg) in turns.

Transmission (Shift Points): Good shift points. No issues

Engine: Powerful and smooth- no issues.

Other: Just low pegs and seat re-design.

PURSUIT COURSE MOTORCYCLE DYNAMICS EVALUATION

2015 BMW R1200RT-P

DRIVERS TOTAL TIME AIR /TRACK SPEED J. Houle, 4:32.71 º F / º F 34.3 B. Thompson 4:29:32 º F / º F 34.7 Average Time 4:32.71 Average Speed 34.3

ITEM RATING** STEERING 10 LEAN ANGLE 10 SUSPENSION 9.5 BRAKE FADE 8.0 BRAKE PULL 9.0 ABS OPERATION N/A

**Rating Scale 1 – 10 / 1 -Poor / 5 – Average / 10 - Outstanding

RIDDER COMMENTS

Brakes: Brakes faded on second lap during decel braking.

Cornering/Handling: Great handling corners and holds the line very well.

Transmission (Shift Points): Shift assist was very helpful. Shifting was quick and smooth.

Engine: Plenty of power through all the ranges.

Other: The traction control seemed to get confused as the brakes started to fade causing the traction control to activate when not needed.

PURSUIT COURSE MOTORCYCLE DYNAMICS EVALUATION

2016 HARLEY DAVIDSON FLHP ROAD KING

DRIVERS TOTAL TIME AIR /TRACK SPEED S. Bryant 4:35.82 º F / º F 33.9 S. Singhanante 4:39.05 º F / º F 33.5 Average Time 4:37.40 Average Speed 33.7

ITEM RATING** STEERING 8.5 LEAN ANGLE 5.0 SUSPENSION 7.7 BRAKE FADE 8.5 BRAKE PULL 7.2 ABS OPERATION 7.5

**Rating Scale 1 – 10 / 1 -Poor / 5 – Average / 10 - Outstanding

RIDDER COMMENTS

Brakes: The brakes worked well until the rise in brake temperature interrupted the opera- tion of the ABS causing the ABS to come on more often than necessary, the bike exhibited erratic and hard brake pulsation coming into sharp turn.

Cornering/Handling: Insufficient lean angle caused rider to consistently changing lines due to fear that the frame might touch the road surface during turns. Not too confidence about leaning dur- ing pursuit ride.

Transmission (Shift Points): Good shifting points and lots of torque.

Engine: Good engine; quick and responsive.

PURSUIT COURSE MOTORCYCLE DYNAMICS EVALUATION

2016 VICTORY COMMANDER 1

DRIVERS TOTAL TIME AIR /TRACK SPEED M. Sepulveda 4:50.00 º F / º F 32.3 M. Marshal 4:45.00 º F / º F 32.8 Average Time 4:47.50 Average Speed 32.5

ITEM RATING** STEERING 7.0 LEAN ANGLE 5.0 SUSPENSION 8.0 BRAKE FADE 10 BRAKE PULL 10 ABS OPERATION N/A

**Rating Scale 1 – 10 / 1 -Poor / 5 – Average / 10 - Outstanding

RIDDER COMMENTS

Brakes: Brakes remained strong for the two laps, no brake fade was experienced.

Cornering/Handling: Difficult to corner. The pegs floor boards were scrapping throughout the pursuit course. The motorcycle felt heavy through the zig-zag (Slalom) cones and on two occa- sions, it was difficult to find the shifter.

Transmission (Shift Points): Transmission is good. However, it jumped out of gear on two separate occasion going into neutral.

Engine: The engine felt strong and generated good power.

Other: Nice motorcycle. However, it felt heavy in the pursuit course.

PURSUIT COURSE MOTORCYCLE DYNAMICS EVALUATION

2016 HARLEY DAVIDSON FLHTP ELECTRA GLIDE

DRIVERS TOTAL TIME AIR /TRACK SPEED S. Singhanante 4:46.45 º F / º F 32.7 S. Bryant 4:39.13 º F / º F 33.5 Average Time 4:42.79 Average Speed 33.1

ITEM RATING** STEERING 8.0 LEAN ANGLE 4.0 SUSPENSION 8.0 BRAKE FADE 8.0 BRAKE PULL 6.0 ABS OPERATION 6.0

**Rating Scale 1 – 10 / 1 -Poor / 5 – Average / 10 - Outstanding

RIDDER COMMENTS

Brakes: Inconsistent during pursuit ride with little fade. Brake pulls hard and heavy pulsa- tion when ABS kicks in .

Cornering/Handling: Limited lean angle. Constantly catching frame and foot boards during turns. Feels unsafe during pursuit ride because of the fear that the bike frame might catch road sur- face.

Transmission (Shift Points): Good shifting points

Engine: Very quick and responsive engine. Smooth while riding, but idle too rough.

HARD BRAKING

PANIC STOP - 60 MPH TO ZERO

2015 HONDA ST1300P RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE

M. Marshall 139.5 @ 60MPH

2015 BMW R1200 RT-P RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE B. Thompson 129.6 @ 60 MPH

2016 HARLEY DAVIDSON ROAD KING RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE B. Thompson 138.7 @ 60 MPH

2016 VICTORY COMMANDER 1 RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE B. Thompson 143.4 @ 60 MPH

2016 HARLEY DAVIDSON FLHTP ELECTRA GLIDE RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE M. Sepulveda 146.8 @ 60 MPH

DEBRIS FIELD BRAKING

SANDY SURFACE - 40 MPH TO ZERO

2016 HONDA ST1300P RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE

M. Sepulveda 88.0 @ 60MPH

2016 BMW R1200 RT-P RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE J. Houle 88.1 @ 60 MPH

2016 HARLEY DAVIDSON ROAD KING RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE M. Marshall 82.7 @ 60 MPH

2016 VICTORY COMMANDER 1 RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE J. Houle 95.5 @ 60 MPH

2016 HARLEY DAVIDSON FLHTP ELECTRA GLIDE RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE J. Houle 87.0 @ 60 MPH

TRANSITORY BRAKING

DRY TO WET 40 MPH TO ZERO

2015 HONDA ST1300P RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE

J. Houle 58.6 @ 60MPH

2015 BMW R1200 RT-P RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE J. Houle 58.0 @ 60 MPH

2016 HARLEY DAVIDSON ROAD KING RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE M. Marshall 62.6 @ 60 MPH

2016 VICTORY COMMANDER 1 RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE B. Thompson 70.6 @ 60 MPH

2016 HARLEY DAVIDSON FLHTP ELECTRA GLIDE RIDER STOPPING DISTANCE J. Houle 64.7 @ 60 MPH

ERGONOMICS EVALUATION RIDES ERGONOMICS EVALUATION SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION – 157 MILE RIDE

MOTORCYCLE HONDA ST1300P

RIDER Start Mileage End Mileage Fuel consumed

RIDING POSITION CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Seat Comfort Padding, Springs, Width 7 Seat Position Range of Adjustment 7 Riding Position Lean Angle, Comfort 7 Floorboards / Pegs Access to Foot Controls 7 RIDER COMMENTS The seat is large and well-padded with three settings for height adjustment. Riding position lean angle was slightly forward putting the handlebars within easy reach. The application of the foot gear shifter and brake pedal functions with easy in all conditions.

INSTRUMENT PANEL CONSIDERSATIONS Controls Position, Usability 7 Visibility Instruments 7 Reflection / Glare Windshield, Instruments 7 Instruments Adequacy, Legibility 7 RIDER COMMENTS The instrument cludter is configured with analog dials for speedometer and tachometer, coupled with an LED display window for a wide variety of functions. All are positioned for ease of view- ing and functions very well, but dimly lit making it difficult to read in bright daylight sun.

MIRRORS CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Road Visibility Distortion, Obstruction 7 Reflections Instruments, Controls 7 Mirror Coverage Adjustment, Rear Visibility, Flat or Convex 7 Mirror Location Accessibility, Visibility, Obstruction 7 RIDER COMMENTS The mirrors are positioned in a way for good reference to the rear with absolutely zero vibra- tion during dynamic or static mode and were easily adjustable.

WIND SCREEN CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Height / Width Wind / Debris Protection 8 Adjustability Electric or Manual, Ease of Use 8 Top Edge Clear View Over Top of Windshield, (Bifocal Effect) 8 RIDER COMMENTS The windscreen is electrically operated via a rocker switch on the left handlebar. It provided good wind and debris protection. Wind protection is excellent, zero buffeting at high speed.

CONTROLS CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Handlebars Angle, Size, Position 8 Shift Levers Usability, Shift Pad Position 8 Switches Reach, Markings, Visibility, Accessibility 8 Rear Brake Pedal Location, Feedback, Ease of Use 8 Front Brake Lever Location, Feedback, Adjustability 8 Clutch Lever Lever Resistance, Adjustability 8 RIDER COMMENTS The handlebars has a pull-back design allowing the rider to sit back slightly while still maintain- ing that aggressive seated position. The switches are small and numbered but easily reachable and provided good functionality. The foot shifter is well placed allowing for solid up and down shift with ease . The rear brake pedal positioning and configuration is consistent with the style of motorcycle allowing for ease of application. Controls provided good feedback from roadway surfaces.

MOUNT / DISMOUNT CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Trunk Height Ample Leg Swing Room 8 Foot Peg / Floorboard Interferes With Mounting / Dismounting 8 Lean Angle Side Stand of Adequate Length 8 RIDERS COMMENTS Trunk height on this bike was not objectionable. There was ample leg swing room while mount- ing and dismounting from either side of the bike. The foot pg did not interfere at all. Side stand length is adequate to safely support the bike at a proper lean angle.

SUSPENSION CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Quality of Ride Dampening, Rebound 7 Rider Size Adjustability 8 RIDER COMMENTS The ride was very comfortable and smooth at all speeds. The suspension was solid and predicta- ble ae in

STORAGE CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Saddlebags Angle, Size and Position of Opening 8 Compartment Dividers Holds Gear Upright When Open N/A Locks Same Key, Security, Sturdiness 9 RIDER COMMENTS Saddle bags are of adequate size having ample room for storage. There are no compartment di- viders to hold patrol gears upright, if the bags are to open while driving it would be easy to lose the contents. Locks were operated by ignition key and were sturdy.

ADDITIONAL RIDER COMMENTS

ERGONOMICS EVALUATION SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION – 157 MILE RIDE

MOTORCYCLE BMW R1200RT-P

RIDER Shawn Bryant / Jeffery Houle Start Mileage End Mileage Fuel consumed

RIDING POSITION CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Seat Comfort Padding, Springs, Width 7.0 Seat Position Range of Adjustment 7.5 Riding Position Lean Angle, Comfort 7.5 Floorboards / Pegs Access to Foot Controls 7.5 RIDER COMMENTS The seat is firm but overall it’s comfortable.

INSTRUMENT PANEL CONSIDERSATIONS Controls Position, Usability 7.5 Visibility Instruments 7.5 Reflection / Glare Windshield, Instruments 7.7 Instruments Adequacy, Legibility 7.7 RIDER COMMENTS The under the hand grip switched for the push-to-talk , and lights and siren could be closer to the end of grip

MIRRORS CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Road Visibility Distortion, Obstruction 8.0 Reflections Instruments, Controls 8.0 Mirror Coverage Adjustment, Rear Visibility, Flat or Convex 7.5 Mirror Location Accessibility, Visibility, Obstruction 8.0 RIDER COMMENTS Bigger mirrors would be better.

WIND SCREEN CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Height / Width Wind / Debris Protection 7.2 Adjustability Electric or Manual, Ease of Use 8.0 Top Edge Clear View Over Top of Windshield, (Bifocal 7.2 Effect) RIDER COMMENTS Wind screen could be little higher for taller riders.

CONTROLS CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Handlebars Angle, Size, Position 7.7 Shift Levers Usability, Shift Pad Position 7.7 Switches Reach, Markings, Visibility, Accessibility 7.0 Rear Brake Pedal Location, Feedback, Ease of Use 8.0 Front Brake Lever Location, Feedback, Adjustability 8.0 Clutch Lever Lever Resistance, Adjustability 8.0 RIDER COMMENTS Although there are a lot of control buttons, you adapt very quick to the overall feel for the con- trols and switches.

MOUNT / DISMOUNT CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Trunk Height Ample Leg Swing Room 7.5 Foot Peg / Floorboard Interferes With Mounting / Dismounting 8.0 Lean Angle Side Stand of Adequate Length 7.5 RIDERS COMMENTS The trunk is noticeably high in relation to rider, requiring a high leg swing to mount/dismount bike. Side stand access being placed between the foot peg and gear shift, need to point foot out to put it down.

SUSPENSION CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Quality of Ride Dampening, Rebound 8.0 Rider Size Adjustability 7.5 RIDER COMMENTS A little tall for shorter riders.

STORAGE CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Saddlebags Angle, Size and Position of Opening 7.0 Compartment Dividers Holds Gear Upright When Open N/A Locks Same Key, Security, Sturdiness 7.5 RIDER COMMENTS When saddle bags are re-designed, it would be nice if they were a little bigger.

ADDITIONAL RIDER COMMENTS

ERGONOMICS EVALUATION SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION – 157 MILE RIDE

MOTORCYCLE HARLEY DAVIDSON FLHP ROAD KING

RIDER S. Bryant / J. Houle Start Mileage End Mileage Fuel consumed

RIDING POSITION CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Seat Comfort Padding, Springs, Width 5.0 Seat Position Range of Adjustment 6.0 Riding Position Lean Angle, Comfort 6.0 Floorboards / Pegs Access to Foot Controls 6.5 RIDER COMMENTS Seat design is uncomfortable for rider causing the rider’s thigh to hit the seat and also slides rid- er’s body forward when he puts his foot down.

INSTRUMENT PANEL CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Controls Position, Usability 6.0 Visibility Instruments 5.0 Reflection / Glare Windshield, Instruments 6.0 Instruments Adequacy, Legibility 5.5 RIDER COMMENTS Horn in odd position. The light indicators are very small and are on the gas tank below the tach, hard to find without having to look down.

MIRRORS CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Road Visibility Distortion, Obstruction 5.5 Reflections Instruments, Controls 6.5 Mirror Coverage Adjustment, Rear Visibility, Flat or Convex 5.5 Mirror Location Accessibility, Visibility, Obstruction 5.5 RIDER COMMENTS Recommend bigger mirrors.

WIND SCREEN CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Height / Width Wind / Debris Protection 5.7 Adjustability Electric or Manual, Ease of Use 6.0 Top Edge Clear View Over Top of Windshield, (Bifocal 6.5 Effect) RIDER COMMENTS Inadequate wind screen height for upper body protection, no fairing.

CONTROLS CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Handlebars Angle, Size, Position 6.5 Shift Levers Usability, Shift Pad Position 6.5 Switches Reach, Markings, Visibility, Accessibility 6.5 Rear Brake Pedal Location, Feedback, Ease of Use 6.5 Front Brake Lever Location, Feedback, Adjustability 6.5 Clutch Lever Lever Resistance, Adjustability 6.5 RIDER COMMENTS Clutch pull heavy.

MOUNT / DISMOUNT CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Trunk Height Ample Leg Swing Room N/A Foot Peg / Floorboard Interferes With Mounting / Dismounting 6.5 Lean Angle Side Stand of Adequate Length 6.5 RIDERS COMMENTS No trunk installed.

SUSPENSION CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Quality of Ride Dampening, Rebound 5.0 Rider Size Adjustability 5.0 RIDER COMMENTS The bike rides very stiff. Suspension travel feels minimal. Fatiguing on rough roads.

STORAGE CONSIDERSATIONS Saddlebags Angle, Size and Position of Opening 7.0 Compartment Dividers Holds Gear Upright When Open 8.0 Locks Same Key, Security, Sturdiness 7.0 RIDER COMMENTS Average saddle bags but it works well.

ADDITIONAL RIDER COMMENTS The engine gets very hot during heavy traffic. You feel a great deal of heat when you put your foot down, you need to make sure your leg is away from the engine case/ clutch because it’s ex- tremely hot.

ERGONOMICS EVALUATION SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION – 157 MILE RIDE

MOTORCYCLE VICTORY COMMANDER 1

RIDER J. Houle / S. Bryant Start Mileage End Mileage Fuel consumed

RIDING POSITION CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Seat Comfort Padding, Springs, Width 6.5 Seat Position Range of Adjustment 6.0 Riding Position Lean Angle, Comfort 5.5 Floorboards / Pegs Access to Foot Controls 5.5 RIDER COMMENTS The seating position has rider leaning back, handlebars very close to riders lap and lumbar back support is half full. These conditions may be unsuitable for enforcement rider. Floorboards scrape the road surface oftentimes digging into asphalt during canyon ride.

INSTRUMENT PANEL CONSIDERSATIONS Controls Position, Usability 6.0 Visibility Instruments 6.5 Reflection / Glare Windshield, Instruments 6.0 Instruments Adequacy, Legibility 6.5 RIDER COMMENTS The controls were well positioned and easy to see.

MIRRORS CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Road Visibility Distortion, Obstruction 6.5 Reflections Instruments, Controls 6.5 Mirror Coverage Adjustment, Rear Visibility, Flat or Convex 5.0 Mirror Location Accessibility, Visibility, Obstruction 6.0 RIDER COMMENTS Bigger mirrors would be advantageous.

WIND SCREEN CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Height / Width Wind / Debris Protection 6.0 Adjustability Electric or Manual, Ease of Use 4.0 Top Edge Clear View Over Top of Windshield, (Bifocal 6.5 Effect) RIDER COMMENTS Adjustable wind deflector works well. Exposed sharp metal edges of the mounting brackets of the manual adjustable windshield could be an issue during accident.

CONTROLS CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Handlebars Angle, Size, Position 5.5 Shift Levers Usability, Shift Pad Position 6.0 Switches Reach, Markings, Visibility, Accessibility 6.5 Rear Brake Pedal Location, Feedback, Ease of Use 7.0 Front Brake Lever Location, Feedback, Adjustability 7.0 Clutch Lever Lever Resistance, Adjustability 5.0 RIDER COMMENTS Clutch pulls heavy. Not sure if ABS “Off” switch is recommended for enforcement riders. Heel shifter was accidentally hit few times during the canyon ride—more foot room?

MOUNT / DISMOUNT CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Trunk Height Ample Leg Swing Room 6.0 Foot Peg / Floorboard Interferes With Mounting / Dismounting 6.5 Lean Angle Side Stand of Adequate Length 6.5 RIDERS COMMENTS The rear box is tall and bulky.

SUSPENSION CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Quality of Ride Dampening, Rebound 5.7 Rider Size Adjustability 6.0 RIDER COMMENTS The bike rides stiff, rocks front to back on certain bumps.

STORAGE CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Saddlebags Angle, Size and Position of Opening 6.0 Compartment Dividers Holds Gear Upright When Open N/A Locks Same Key, Security, Sturdiness 6.0 RIDER COMMENTS Rear radio box to big and bulky.

ADDITIONAL RIDER COMMENTS The transmission shifts roughly and the engine heats up during stop and go traffic which was felt on the upper body of the rider. Very heavy bike and want to upright itself during lean.

ERGONOMICS EVALUATION SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION – 157 MILE RIDE

MOTORCYCLE HARLEY DAVIDSON FLHTP ELECTRA GLIDE

RIDER S. Bryant / J. Houle Start Mileage End Mileage Fuel consumed

RIDING POSITION CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Seat Comfort Padding, Springs, Width 5.0 Seat Position Range of Adjustment 5.0 Riding Position Lean Angle, Comfort 5.5 Floorboards / Pegs Access to Foot Controls 6.0 RIDER COMMENTS The seat is very uncomfortable, spring seems to hit you in the back over moderate road bumps. One rider noted being bumped out of seat several times during the ride.

INSTRUMENT PANEL CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Controls Position, Usability 6.0 Visibility Instruments 5.5 Reflection / Glare Windshield, Instruments 6.0 Instruments Adequacy, Legibility 6.0 RIDER COMMENTS

MIRRORS CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Road Visibility Distortion, Obstruction 6.5 Reflections Instruments, Controls 5.5 Mirror Coverage Adjustment, Rear Visibility, Flat or Convex 6.0 Mirror Location Accessibility, Visibility, Obstruction 6.0 RIDER COMMENTS The mirrors are flat with limited view. Convex and bigger size mirrors would be nice.

WIND SCREEN CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Height / Width Wind / Debris Protection 6.0 Adjustability Electric or Manual, Ease of Use N/A Top Edge Clear View Over Top of Windshield, (Bifocal 6.0 Effect) RIDER COMMENTS Adequate wind protection.

CONTROLS CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Handlebars Angle, Size, Position 6.0 Shift Levers Usability, Shift Pad Position 6.0 Switches Reach, Markings, Visibility, Accessibility 6.0 Rear Brake Pedal Location, Feedback, Ease of Use 6.0 Front Brake Lever Location, Feedback, Adjustability 6.0 Clutch Lever Lever Resistance, Adjustability 5.5 RIDER COMMENTS Clutch pull really stiff.

MOUNT / DISMOUNT CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Trunk Height Ample Leg Swing Room 6.5 Foot Peg / Floorboard Interferes With Mounting / Dismounting 6.5 Lean Angle Side Stand of Adequate Length 6.0 RIDERS COMMENTS Floorboard interference during stepping off.

SUSPENSION CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Quality of Ride Dampening, Rebound 4.0 Rider Size Adjustability 5.0 RIDER COMMENTS The ride is very stiff. You can really feel the hard bumps

STORAGE CONSIDERSATIONS RATING Saddlebags Angle, Size and Position of Opening 7.0 Compartment Dividers Holds Gear Upright When Open 7.5 Locks Same Key, Security, Sturdiness 7.5 RIDER COMMENTS

ADDITIONAL RIDER COMMENTS During a city traffic, engine gets very hot and may need to be turned off to cool off but engine is very hard to re-start while still hot. This situation could be problem for law enforcement officer.

ACCELERATION EVALUATION

ACCELERATION EVALUATION

SPEED HONDA ST1300P BMW R1200RT-P HD ROAD KING 0-30 MPH 1.8 2.1 2.2 0-60 MPH 4.1 4.3 5.7 0-100 MPH 10.5 10.2 16.7

30-60 MPH 2.7 2.4 3.7 60-100 MPH 6.5 5.6 14.8 ¼ MILE [email protected] mph [email protected] mph 14.2 @ 94.3 mph

VICTORY HD-ELECTRA SPEED COMMANDER 1 GLIDE 0-30 MPH 2.0 2.0 0-60 MPH 5.5 4.9 0-100 MPH 15.8 14.4

30-60 MPH 3.2 3.4 60-100 MPH 11.4 9.5 ¼ MILE [email protected] mph [email protected] mph

FUEL EFFICIENCY EVALUATION*

MOTORCYCLE COMBINED AVERAGE Two 116 Mile Loops 2014 HONDA ST1300P 42.0 MPG 2014 BMW R1200 RT-P 39.7 MPG 2014 HARLEY DAVIDSON ROAD KING 33.2 MPG 2014 VICTORY COMMANDER 1 32.6 MPG 2014 HARLEY DAVIDSON ELECTRA GLIDE 33.2 MPG

EVALUATION HEAT EVALUATION IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING 32 LAP COURSE

2016 HONDA ST1300P ITEM MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION TEST RESULT Radiator Water 208° to 216° Max. Pass

Engine Oil 176° to 248° Max. Pass Transmission Oil N/A Part of the engine case N/A RADIANT HEAT Oil Coolers 184° F

Brake Rotors Front- 113 ° F Rear– 168 ° F Engine 197 ° F Transmission N/A

Exhaust 202° F

2016 BMW R1200RT-P ITEM MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION TEST RESULT Radiator Water 239° F Pass Engine Oil 302° F Pass Transmission Oil 302° F Pass RADIANT HEAT Oil Coolers 155 ° F Brake Rotors Front- 99 ° F Rear- 214 ° F Engine 193 ° F Transmission 204 ° F Exhaust 114 ° F

HEAT EVALUATION IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING 32 LAP COURSE

2016 HARLEY-DAVIDSON ROAD KING ITEM MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION TEST RESULT Radiator Water N/A N/A Engine Oil 280° to 410° Pass Transmission Oil Pass RADIANT HEAT Oil Cooler N/A Brake Rotors Front- 125 ° F Rear- 337 ° F Engine 305 ° F Transmission 260 ° F

Exhaust 118 ° F

2016 VICTORY COMMANDER 1

ITEM MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION TEST RESULT Radiator Water N/A N/A Engine Oil 280° F - 410° F Pass Transmission Oil Pass

RADIANT HEAT Oil Cooler 241 ° F Brake Rotors Front- 121 ° F Rear– 140 ° F Engine 271 ° F

Transmission 180 ° F Exhaust 270 ° F

HEAT EVALUATION IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING 32 LAP COURSE

2016 HARLEY-DAVIDSON ELECTRA GLIDE ITEM MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION TEST RESULT Radiator Water N/A N/A Engine Oil 280° to 410° Pass Transmission Oil Pass RADIANT HEAT Oil Cooler N/A Brake Rotors Front- 120 ° F Rear– 210 ° F Engine 310 ° F Transmission 243 ° F Exhaust 160 ° F

COMMUNICATIONS EVALUATION

The communications evaluation of each vehicle is conducted by technicians assigned to the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department's Communications and Fleet Management Bureau. This evaluation concerns itself with the radio installation, the effect of radio operation on motorcycle performance and the effect of the motorcycle on radio performance.

The Electromagnetic Interference Susceptibility test is intended for use in the presence of electromagnetic fields resulting from use of public safety two-way radios.

Motorcycle performance must not be affected in any way by transmissions from a radio and antenna in- stalled on the motorcycle and operating in any of the frequency ranges of 450 to 512 MHz, and having a radio frequency output no more than 50 watts. Motorcycle performance shall not be affected by the presence of another motorcycle equipped with the above described radio and operated next to the subject motorcycle.

Radiated and conducted electromagnetic interference motorcycle systems and accessories shall be designed to reduce interference with the use of public safety radio receivers or electronic sirens or sound amplifiers. The effective sensitivity of a receiver installed on the motorcycle shall not be reduced by more than the amount tabulated below for each frequency band:

FREQUENCY BAND ALLOWABLE DEGRADATION

450 to 512 MHz 3 dB

Degradation is the difference in effective receiver sensitivity measured with the vehicle engine and ac- cessories turned off as compared to that measured with the engine and accessories turned on.

Sensitivity is measured in terms of the 12 dB Sinad signal as defined in EIA Standard RS-204. To determine effective sensitivity, the receiver is connected to the antenna through an isolating tee connector which allows introduction of the signal generator through the isolated port. Comparative signal strength readings are then taken with and without the interference present. COMMUNICATION NOISE EVALUATION 2016 HONDA ST1300P

RADIO MAKE MODEL NO. ANTENNA TYPE LOCATION

Motorola XTL-5000 M20SSS9PW1AN 2dB Gain Whip Rear

** Rating Scale: 1-10 (1-Poor / 5 –Average / 10-Outstanding)

FREQUENCY: 483.0875 MHz WITH ANTENNA 12 dB SINAD 20 dB QUIETING DESENS dB Engine Off -89dB -92dB 2dB Engine Idle (No Acc) -89dB -92dB 2dB Engine High RPM (No Acc) -89dB -92dB 2dB Engine Idle W/Air N/A N/A N/A Engine Idle W/ Lights -89dB -92dB 2dB Engine Idle W/Heater N/A N/A N/A Engine Idle W/All Acc -89dB -92dB 2dB Engine High RPM W/All Acc -89dB -92dB 2dB

Glove Compartment Accessibility – (Undercover Use) Rating ** Control Head Microphone Electronic Siren Dashboard Accessibility Radio Control Head 5 Siren Console 7 Mobile Digital Terminal/Computer Speakers Microphones Trunk Accessibility Factory Power Terminal in Trunk 0 One Radio Installation 3 Two Radio Installation Antenna Installation Computer Installation Engine Accessibility Battery Terminal Connection 3 Accommodation for Cables 4 Hidden Siren Installation Ignition Fuse Terminal Block Clip – on Connections for Accessories 3 COMMUNICATION NOISE EVALUATION 2016 BMW R1200RT-P

RADIO MAKE MODEL NO. ANTENNA TYPE LOCATION

Motorola XTL-5000 M20SSS9PW1AN 2dB Gain Whip Rear

** Rating Scale: 1-10 (1-Poor / 5 –Average / 10-Outstanding)

FREQUENCY: 483.0875 MHz WITH ANTENNA 12 dB SINAD 20 dB QUIETING DESENS dB Engine Off -90dB -87dB 1dB Engine Idle (No Acc) -90dB -87dB 1dB Engine High RPM (No Acc) -90dB -87dB 1dB Engine Idle W/Air N/A N/A N/A Engine Idle W/ Lights -90dB -87dB 0dB Engine Idle W/Heater N/A N/A N/A Engine Idle W/All Acc -90dB -87dB 0dB Engine High RPM W/All Acc -90dB -87dB 0dB

Glove Compartment Accessibility – (Undercover Use) Rating ** Control Head Microphone Electronic Siren Dashboard Accessibility Radio Control Head 5 Siren Console 7 Mobile Digital Terminal/Computer Speakers 10 Microphones 4 Trunk Accessibility Factory Power Terminal in Trunk One Radio Installation 5 Two Radio Installation Antenna Installation 5 Computer Installation Engine Accessibility Battery Terminal Connection 6 Accommodation for Cables 5 Hidden Siren Installation Ignition Fuse Terminal Block Clip – on Connections for Accessories 6 COMMUNICATION NOISE EVALUATION 2016 HARLEY DAVIDSON FLHP ROAD KING

RADIO MAKE MODEL NO. ANTENNA TYPE LOCATION

Motorola XTL-5000 M20SSS9PW1AN 2dB Gain Whip Rear

** Rating Scale: 1-10 (1-Poor / 5 –Average / 10-Outstanding)

FREQUENCY: 483.0875 MHz WITH ANTENNA 12 dB SINAD 20 dB QUIETING DESENS dB Engine Off -89dB -82dB 2dB Engine Idle (No Acc) -89dB -82dB 2dB Engine High RPM (No Acc) -90dB -80dB 2dB Engine Idle W/Air N/A N/A N/A Engine Idle W/ Lights -90dB -82dB 1dB Engine Idle W/Heater N/A N/A N/A Engine Idle W/All Acc -88dB -82dB 2dB Engine High RPM W/All Acc -88dB -81dB 2dB

Glove Compartment Accessibility – (Undercover Use) Rating ** Control Head Microphone Electronic Siren

Dashboard Accessibility Radio Control Head 5 Siren Console 7 Mobile Digital Terminal/Computer Speakers 5 Microphones 5 Trunk Accessibility Factory Power Terminal in Trunk 8 One Radio Installation 8 Two Radio Installation Antenna Installation 8 Computer Installation Engine Accessibility Battery Terminal Connection 3 Accommodation for Cables 5 Hidden Siren Installation Ignition Fuse Terminal Block Clip – on Connections for Accessories 3 COMMUNICATION NOISE EVALUATION 2016 VICORY COMMANDER 1

RADIO MAKE MODEL NO. ANTENNA TYPE LOCATION

Motorola XTL-5000 M20SSS9PW1AN 2dB Gain Whip Rear

** Rating Scale: 1-10 (1-Poor / 5 –Average / 10-Outstanding)

FREQUENCY: 483.0875 MHz WITH ANTENNA 12 dB SINAD 20 dB QUIETING DESENS dB Engine Off -91dB -98dB 1dB Engine Idle (No Acc) -89dB -91dB 2dB Engine High RPM (No Acc) -89dB -91dB 2dB Engine Idle W/Air N/A N/A N/A Engine Idle W/ Lights -85dB -88dB 6dB Engine Idle W/Heater N/A N/A N/A Engine Idle W/All Acc -85dB -86dB 6dB Engine High RPM W/All Acc -88dB -86dB 3dB

Glove Compartment Accessibility – (Undercover Use) Rating ** Control Head Microphone Electronic Siren

Dashboard Accessibility Radio Control Head 6 Siren Console 7 Mobile Digital Terminal/Computer Speakers 5 Microphones 6 Trunk Accessibility Factory Power Terminal in Trunk 8 One Radio Installation 7 Two Radio Installation Antenna Installation 7 Computer Installation Engine Accessibility Battery Terminal Connection 5 Accommodation for Cables 5 Hidden Siren Installation Ignition Fuse Terminal Block Clip – on Connections for Accessories 8 COMMUNICATION NOISE EVALUATION 2016 HARLEY DAVIDSON FLHTP ELECTRA GLIDE

RADIO MAKE MODEL NO. ANTENNA TYPE LOCATION

Motorola XTL-5000 M20SSS9PW1AN 2dB Gain Whip Rear

** Rating Scale: 1-10 (1-Poor / 5 –Average / 10-Outstanding)

FREQUENCY: 483.0875 MHz WITH ANTENNA 12 dB SINAD 20 dB QUIETING DESENS dB Engine Off -90dB -91dB 1dB Engine Idle (No Acc) -89dB -91dB 1dB Engine High RPM (No Acc) -89dB -91dB 1dB Engine Idle W/Air N/A N/A N/A Engine Idle W/ Lights -89dB -91dB 1dB Engine Idle W/Heater N/A N/A N/A Engine Idle W/All Acc -89dB -91dB 1dB Engine High RPM W/All Acc -89dB -91dB 1dB

Glove Compartment Accessibility – (Undercover Use) Rating ** Control Head Microphone Electronic Siren Dashboard Accessibility Radio Control Head 5 Siren Console 7 Mobile Digital Terminal/Computer Speakers 5 Microphones 5 Trunk Accessibility Factory Power Terminal in Trunk 8 One Radio Installation 8 Two Radio Installation Antenna Installation 8 Computer Installation Engine Accessibility Battery Terminal Connection 8 Accommodation for Cables 5 Hidden Siren Installation Ignition Fuse Terminal Block Clip – on Connections for Accessories 3