DOCSLIB.ORG

Campo Wind BTR Part10 C-2 2018 Focused Quino

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Campo Wind BTR Part10 C-2 2018 Focused Quino APPENDIX C-2 2018 Focused Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Report for the Torrey Wind Project -XQH 86)LVKDQG:LOGOLIH6HUYLFH $WWHQWLRQ6WDFH\/RYH5HFRYHU\3HUPLW&RRUGLQDWRU 6DON$YHQXH6XLWH &DUOVEDG&DOLIRUQLD Subject: 2018 Focused Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Report for the Torrey Wind Project, Boulevard, San Diego County, California 'HDU0V/RYH 7KLVOHWWHUUHSRUWGRFXPHQWVWKHVSULQJUHVXOWVRIDIRFXVHGVXUYH\FRQGXFWHGE\'XGHNIRU WKH IHGHUDOO\ OLVWHG HQGDQJHUHG 4XLQR FKHFNHUVSRW EXWWHUIO\ Euphydryas editha quino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±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s. Stacey Love, Recovery Permit Coordinator Subject: 2018 Focused Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Report for the Campo Wind Project, Boulevard, San Diego County, California ([LVWLQJODQGXVHVZLWKLQWKHYLFLQLW\RIWKH VWXG\DUHD FDQEHFKDUDFWHUL]HGDV SUHGRPLQDQWO\ UXUDO ODUJHORW UDQFKHV DQG VLQJOHIDPLO\ KRPHV ZLWK D PL[WXUH RI VPDOOVFDOH DJULFXOWXUH UHFUHDWLRQDO DQG RSHQ VSDFH ZLWK WKH H[FHSWLRQ RI WKH &DPSR %DQG RI .XPH\DD\ ,QGLDQV 5HVHUYDWLRQ ZLQG WXUELQHV WR WKH QRUWK RI , DQG WKH 7XOH :LQG 3URMHFW 7KH NLORYROW 6XQULVH3RZHUOLQNWUDYHUVHVWKHQRUWKHDVWSRUWLRQRIWKHVWXG\DUHD 7KHVWXG\DUHDLVZLWKLQWKH86*HRORJLFDO6XUYH\¶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± 7KH VSHFLHV (GLWK¶V FKHFNHUVSRW E. editha KDVDUDQJHH[WHQGLQJIURP%ULWLVK&ROXPELDDQG$OEHUWD&DQDGDVRXWK WKURXJK&RORUDGRDQG8WDKDQGZHVWDORQJWKHFRDVWWRQRUWKHUQ%DMD&DOLIRUQLD,WLVGLYLGHG LQWR VXEVSHFLHV HDFK RI ZKLFK KDV LWV RZQ UDQJH DQG ELRORJLFDO DQG PRUSKRORJLFDO FKDUDFWHULVWLFV,Q&DOLIRUQLDWKHUHDUHVXEVSHFLHV *DUWKDQG7LOGHQ WKUHHRIZKLFKDUH FXUUHQWO\NQRZQWRRFFXULQ6RXWKHUQ&DOLIRUQLD7KH4XLQRLVWKHVRXWKZHVWHUQPRVWVXEVSHFLHV RIE. editha 0DWWRQLHWDO 7KH4XLQRLVNQRZQWRRFFXULQDVVRFLDWLRQZLWKDYDULHW\RISODQWFRPPXQLWLHVVRLOW\SHVDQG HOHYDWLRQV XS WR IHHW DERYH PHDQ VHD OHYHO 7KH SODQW FRPPXQLWLHV LQFOXGH FOD\ VRLO PHDGRZVRSHQJUDVVODQGVFRDVWDOVDJHVFUXEFKDPLVHFKDSDUUDOUHGVKDQNFKDSDUUDOMXQLSHU ZRRGODQGVDQGVHPLGHVHUWVFUXE %DOOPHUHWDO 7KH4XLQRLVDOVRDVVRFLDWHGZLWKFOD\ VRLOVWKDWSRVVHVVFU\SWRJDPLFFUXVWVDQGYHUQDOSRROV 86):6 -XQH Ms. Stacey Love, Recovery Permit Coordinator Subject: 2018 Focused Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Report for the Campo Wind Project, Boulevard, San Diego County, California 7KH4XLQRLVDPHGLXPVL]HGEXWWHUIO\ DSSUR[LPDWHO\LQFKWRLQFKZLQJVSDQ EHORQJLQJ WR WKH IDPLO\ 1\PSKDOLGDH 7KH DGXOWV DUH SULPDULO\ RUDQJHUHG ZLWK ZKLWH DQG KDYH EODFN PDUNLQJVRQWKHGRUVDOZLQJVXUIDFH7KH\DUHDFWLYHSULPDULO\LQ0DUFKDQG$SULO7KLVDFWLYH SHULRGPD\YDU\GHSHQGLQJRQZHDWKHUFRQGLWLRQV %DOOPHUHWDO 7KHDGXOWEXWWHUIO\IHHGV RQ QHFWDU ZKLFK LW REWDLQV IURP VSULQJ DQQXDOV VXFK DV SRSFRUQIORZHU Plagiobothrys VSS Cryptantha VSS ZKLWHGDLV\ WLG\WLSV Layia glandulosa JROGHQEXVK Ericameria VSS SLQFXVKLRQ Chaenactis VSS ILGGOHQHFN Amsinckia VSS FKLD Salvia columbariae DQG EOXHGLFNV Dichelostemma capitatum DPRQJRWKHUV $GXOWPDOHVDQGYLUJLQIHPDOHVVRPHWLPHV³KLOOWRS´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lantago erecta 3DWDJRQLD SODQWDLQ P. patagonica &RXOWHU¶V VQDSGUDJRQ Antirrhinum coulterianum DQG&KLQHVHKRXVHV Collinsia concolor DVWKHLUKRVWSODQWV 3UDWW 6WLIIEUDQFKELUG¶VEHDN Cordylanthus rigidus DQGH[VHUWHG,QGLDQSDLQWEUXVK Castilleja exserta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¶VUHGXFWLRQLQSRSXODWLRQDUHQRWZHOOXQGHUVWRRG+DELWDWORVVGXHWR GHJUDGDWLRQ DQG IUDJPHQWDWLRQ FDXVHG E\ XUEDQ DQG UXUDO GHYHORSPHQW DJULFXOWXUDO FRQYHUVLRQ RIIURDG YHKLFXODU XVH WKH LQYDVLRQ RI QRQQDWLYH SODQWV DQG LQVHFWV ILUH PDQDJHPHQWSUDFWLFHVRYHUFROOHFWLQJDQGDGYHUVHZHDWKHUFRQGLWLRQVKDYHOLNHO\FRQWULEXWHG WRWKHVSHFLHV¶GHFOLQH )5± -XQH Ms. Stacey Love, Recovery Permit Coordinator Subject: 2018 Focused Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Report for the Campo Wind Project, Boulevard, San Diego County, California 0HWKRGV 3ULRUWRWKHIRFXVHGVXUYH\V'XGHNELRORJLVWVFRQGXFWHGDKDELWDWDVVHVVPHQWZLWKLQWKHVWXG\DUHD WR LGHQWLI\ VXLWDEOH KDELWDW DQG H[FOXGH XQVXLWDEOH KDELWDW ([FOXGHG DUHDV FRQVLVWHG RI GHYHORSHG DUHDVDQGGHQVHO\YHJHWDWHGFKDSDUUDOZLWKWDOOVKUXEVIRUPLQJFORVHGFDQRSLHV+RVWSODQWVXUYH\V ZHUHSHUIRUPHGLQFRQFHUWZLWKWKHKDELWDWDVVHVVPHQWDQGDXJPHQWHGGXULQJWKHVXUYH\HIIRUW 7KH 86):6 SURWRFRO VWDWHV WKDW IRFXVHG 4XLQR VXUYH\V VKRXOG EHJLQ WKH WKLUG ZHHN RI )HEUXDU\DQGHQGWKHVHFRQG6DWXUGD\LQ0D\XQOHVVRWKHUZLVHDSSURYHGE\86):66XUYH\V DUHWREHFRQGXFWHGGXULQJWKHDGXOWIOLJKWVHDVRQE\ELRORJLVWVSRVVHVVLQJDUHFRYHU\SHUPLWIRU WKLV VSHFLHV SXUVXDQW WR 6HFWLRQ D $ RI WKH IHGHUDO (QGDQJHUHG 6SHFLHV $FW 86):6 7KHIRFXVHGVXUYH\VIROORZHGWKH86):6SURWRFROZLWKWKHH[FHSWLRQRIDQ DSSURYHGDPHQGPHQWLQFOXGHGLQWKHQRWLILFDWLRQ 86):6 7KHDPHQGPHQWDOORZHG VXUYH\VWREHJLQWKHZHHNRI0DUFKWRDFFRXQWIRUWKHORFDWLRQ¶VKLJKHUHOHYDWLRQJHQHUDOO\ FROGHUFRQGLWLRQVDQGJHQHUDOODWHUVWDUWRI4XLQRHPHUJHQFH )RFXVHG4XLQRVXUYH\VZHUHFRQGXFWHGRYHUYLVLWVIURP0DUFKWKURXJK0D\ SHUWKH86):64XLQR&KHFNHUVSRW%XWWHUIO\6XUYH\*XLGHOLQHV VHH7DEOH 7KH VXUYH\DUHDFRQVLVWHGRIVXLWDEOHKDELWDWIRU4XLQRFKHFNHUVSRW )LJXUHVDQG 6XUYH\VZHUH FRQGXFWHGE\4XLQRSHUPLWWHGELRORJLVWV$QLWD+D\ZRUWK 7( %URFN2UWHJD 7( &DOOLH$PRDNX 7(% 'DYLG(ULN/D&RVWH 7( 'LDQD6DXFHGR 7( (ULQ%HUJPDQ 7( -HII3ULHVW 7( 0DUJLH0XOOLJDQ 7( % 3DWULFLD 6FKX\OHU 7(% 3DXO 0 /HPRQV 7( DQG 7ULFLD :RWLSND ZRUNLQJXQGHU7( 7DEOH 6FKHGXOHRI)RFXVHG4XLQR&KHFNHUVSRW%XWWHUIO\6XUYH\V Survey Survey Survey Area Pass Date Biologist Survey Time Conditions Notes N/A Habitat 2018-02-16 SC 8:00 AM–5:00 PM Air temp: 43°F–57°F; ground Assessment temp: 70°F–77°F; 80% cloud cover; 0 mph wind 1 1 2018-03-12 CA, PS 9:45 AM–4:50 PM Air temp: 62°F–75°F; ground Survey temp: 70°F–77°F; 20%–40% included cloud cover; 0–2 mph wind; clear area 3 2 2018-03-19 CA, EB, PS 9:27 AM–2:19 PM Air temp: 55°F–57°F; ground temp: 55°F–57°F; 20% cloud cover; 0–5 mph wind; clear 3 2018-03-28 EB, PS 9:00 AM–12:45 PM Air temp: 65°F–74°F; ground temp: 76°F; 0% cloud cover; 0–4 mph wind -XQH Ms. Stacey Love, Recovery Permit Coordinator Subject: 2018 Focused Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Report for the Campo Wind Project, Boulevard, San Diego County, California 7DEOH 6FKHGXOHRI)RFXVHG4XLQR&KHFNHUVSRW%XWWHUIO\6XUYH\V Survey Survey Survey Area Pass Date Biologist Survey Time Conditions Notes 4 2018-04-02 CA, PS 9:06 AM–1:14 PM Air temp: 58°F–68°F; ground temp: 63°F–70°F; 0% cloud cover; 0–8 mph wind; clear 5 2018-04-14 CA, EB 9:09 AM–1:18 PM Air temp: 69°F–71°F; ground temp: 70°F–72°F; 0% cloud cover; 0–4 mph wind; clear 6 2018-04-25 JP 8:30 AM–3:30 PM Air temp: 70°F–80°F; ground temp: 70°F–84°F; 0% cloud
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Disastrous Impacts of Trump's Border Wall on Wildlife
    a Wall in the Wild The Disastrous Impacts of Trump’s Border Wall on Wildlife Noah Greenwald, Brian Segee, Tierra Curry and Curt Bradley Center for Biological Diversity, May 2017 Saving Life on Earth Executive Summary rump’s border wall will be a deathblow to already endangered animals on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border. This report examines the impacts of construction of that wall on threatened and endangered species along the entirety of the nearly 2,000 miles of the border between the United States and Mexico. TThe wall and concurrent border-enforcement activities are a serious human-rights disaster, but the wall will also have severe impacts on wildlife and the environment, leading to direct and indirect habitat destruction. A wall will block movement of many wildlife species, precluding genetic exchange, population rescue and movement of species in response to climate change. This may very well lead to the extinction of the jaguar, ocelot, cactus ferruginous pygmy owl and other species in the United States. To assess the impacts of the wall on imperiled species, we identified all species protected as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act, or under consideration for such protection by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“candidates”), that have ranges near or crossing the border. We also determined whether any of these species have designated “critical habitat” on the border in the United States. Finally, we reviewed available literature on the impacts of the existing border wall. We found that the border wall will have disastrous impacts on our most vulnerable wildlife, including: 93 threatened, endangered and candidate species would potentially be affected by construction of a wall and related infrastructure spanning the entirety of the border, including jaguars, Mexican gray wolves and Quino checkerspot butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting California's Butterfly Groves
    Protecting California’s Butterfly Groves Management Guidelines for Monarch Butterfly Overwintering Habitat The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation 1 Protecting California’s Butterfly Groves Management Guidelines for Monarch Butterfly Overwintering Habitat The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation is a nonprofit organization that protects wildlife through the conservation of invertebrates and their habitat. Established in 1971, the Society is a trusted source for science-based information and advice. Our conservation team draws together experts from the fields of habitat restoration, entomology, botany, farming, and conservation biology with a single focus: protecting the life that sustains us. Portland, Oregon www.xerces.org Creekside Center for Earth Observation was founded in 2006 by Drs. Stuart B. Weiss and Paul M. Rich to apply the latest science and technology to address challenging conservation problems. We specialize in experimen- tal design, field measurement, and quantitative analysis. We subscribe to the worldview of Aldo Leopold, who expounded a “land ethic” in which the basic ethical considerations given to human beings are expanded to in- clude the natural world around us. As such, while our work is founded in science, it is also rooted in a deep philosophical commitment to achieve and maintain ecosystem health, preserve vital ecosystem functions, protect rare and endangered species, and expand consciousness about conserva- tion through education and outreach. Menlo Park, California www.creeksidescience.org Copyright © 2017 the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation Acknowledgments This report was developed with funding from Monarch Joint Venture, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and members of the Xerces Society. Additional funding to support the Xerces Society’s western monarch conservation work comes from Alice C.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of San Bernardino County, California
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomic Report of the INTERNATIONAL LEPIDOPTERA SURVEY
    Volume 7 1 February 2010 Number 3 The Taxonomic Report OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEPIDOPTERA SURVEY TIPS ON COLLECTING AND REARING IMMATURES OF 375 BUTTERFLY AND SKIPPER TAXA JACQUE WOLFE 459 East 2700 South Apt 16, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 JACK HARRY 47 San Rafael Court, West Jordan, UT 84088 TODD STOUT 1 1456 North General Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 ABSTRACT: Rearing techniques are discussed for 375 different butterfly and skipper taxa from Utah and beyond. Additional keywords: ova, larvae, pupae, over wintering, obtaining and caring for immatures INTRODUCTION The authors of this paper, Jacque Wolfe, Jack Harry, and Todd Stout, with contributions from Dale Nielson have over 100 years combined experience collecting and rearing butterflies. This publication includes natural and lab host plants. We hope that this information will help you avoid some of the mistakes and losses we have experienced. We also hope that this publication will encourage someone who has only collected adults to give rearing a try. For those new to rearing we encourage starting small. Not only can rearing provide perfect specimens but also provide knowledge regarding the life histories of butterflies, which includes how to find caterpillars or how to entice live females to lay eggs. The advantages justify the time and effort it requires. Another advantage of rearing is that some species, like Papilio indra and Megathymus species, are difficult to collect as adults. Therefor, rearing them can be much easier. For example, collecting larvae or netting a single live female can result in obtaining a nice series of perfect specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note
    Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note: BMNA = Butterflies and Moths of North America web site MPG = Moth Photographers Group web site Most are from the Essig Museum’s California Moth Specimens Database web site Arctiidae. Tiger and Lichen Moths. Apantesis proxima (Notarctia proxima). Mexican Tiger Moth. 8181 [BMNA] Ectypia clio (clio). Clio Tiger Moth. 8249 Estigmene acrea (acrea). Salt Marsh Moth. 8131 Euchaetes zella. 8232 Autostichidae (Deoclonidae). Oegoconia novimundi. Four-spotted Yellowneck Moth. 1134 (Oegoconia quadripuncta mis-applied) Bucculatricidae. Ribbed Cocoon-maker Moths. Bucculatrix enceliae. Brittlebrush Moth. 0546 Cossidae. Goat Moths, Carpenterworm Moths, and Leopard Moths. Comadia henrici. 2679 Givira mucida. 2660 Hypopta palmata. 2656 Prionoxystus robiniae (mixtus). Carpenterworm or Locust Borer. 2693 Depressariidae. Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 [MPG] Ethmiidae. Now assigned to Depressariidae. Ethmiinae. Ethmia timberlakei. 0984 Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 Gelechiidae. Twirler Moths. Aristotelia adceanotha. 1726 [Sighting 1019513 BMNA] Chionodes abdominella. 2054 Chionodes dentella. 2071 Chionodes fructuaria. 2078 Chionodes kincaidella. 2086 (reared from Atriplex acanthocarpa in Texas) Chionodes oecus. 2086.2 Chionodes sistrella. 2116 Chionodes xanthophilella. 2125 Faculta inaequalis. Palo Verde Webworm. 2206 Friseria cockerelli. Mesquite Webworm. 1916 Gelechia desiliens. 1938 Isophrictis sabulella. 1701 Keiferia lycopersicella. Tomato Pinworm. 2047 Pectinophora gossypiella. Pink Bollworm. 2261 Prolita puertella. 1895 Prolita veledae. 1903 Geometridae. Inchworm Moths, Loopers, Geometers, or Measuring Worms. Archirhoe neomexicana. 7295 Chesiadodes coniferaria. 6535 Chlorochlamys appellaria. 7073 Cyclophora nanaria. Dwarf Tawny Wave. W 7140 Dichorda illustraria. 7055 Dichordophora phoenix. Phoenix Emerald. 7057 Digrammia colorata. Creosote Moth. 6381 Digrammia irrorata (rubricata). 6395 Digrammia pictipennata. 6372 Digrammia puertata.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Biological Diversity Baseline Report for the Del Dios
    Draft Del Dios Highlands Preserve RMP May 2009 Technical Appendices APPENDIX A Biological Diversity Baseline Report for the Del Dios Highlands Preserve County of San Diego Biological Diversity Baseline Report for the Del Dios Highlands Preserve County of San Diego Prepared for: Department of Parks and Recreation County of San Diego 9150 Chesapeake Dr., Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92123 Contact: Jennifer Haines Prepared by: Technology Associates 9089 Clairemont Mesa Blvd., Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92123 Contact: Christina Schaefer November 4, 2008 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of the Report...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Location.............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Project Description.......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STUDY AREA......................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Geography & Topography .............................................................................................. 9 2.2 Geology and Soils...........................................................................................................9 2.3 Climate.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Baja California Norte, Mexico
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Specimen Records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895
    Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 2019 Vol 3(2) Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895 Jon H. Shepard Paul C. Hammond Christopher J. Marshall Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331 Cite this work, including the attached dataset, as: Shepard, J. S, P. C. Hammond, C. J. Marshall. 2019. Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895. Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 3(2). (beta version). http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/osu/cat_osac.3.2.4594 Introduction These records were generated using funds from the LepNet project (Seltmann) - a national effort to create digital records for North American Lepidoptera. The dataset published herein contains the label data for all North American specimens of Lycaenidae and Riodinidae residing at the Oregon State Arthropod Collection as of March 2019. A beta version of these data records will be made available on the OSAC server (http://osac.oregonstate.edu/IPT) at the time of this publication. The beta version will be replaced in the near future with an official release (version 1.0), which will be archived as a supplemental file to this paper. Methods Basic digitization protocols and metadata standards can be found in (Shepard et al. 2018). Identifications were confirmed by Jon Shepard and Paul Hammond prior to digitization. Nomenclature follows that of (Pelham 2008). Results The holdings in these two families are extensive. Combined, they make up 25,743 specimens (24,598 Lycanidae and 1145 Riodinidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Microhabitat Conditions Associated with the Distribution of Postdiapause Larvae of Euphydryas Editha Quino (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Author(S): Kendall H
    RO-4-123 Microhabitat Conditions Associated with the Distribution of Postdiapause Larvae of Euphydryas editha quino (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Author(s): Kendall H. Osborne and Richard A. Redak Source: Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 93(1):110-114. 2000. Published By: Entomological Society of America DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0110:MCAWTD]2.0.CO;2 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1603/0013-8746%282000%29093%5B0110%3AMCAWTD %5D2.0.CO%3B2 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. CONSERVATION AND BIODIVERSITY Microhabitat Conditions Associated with the Distribution of Postdiapause Larvae of Euphydryas editha quino (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) 1 KENDALL H. OSBORNE AND RICHARD A. REDAK Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93(1): 110Ð114 (2000) ABSTRACT Microhabitats of postdiapause larvae of Euphydryas editha quino (Behr) were found to differ from random habitat points in percentage cover, grass, shade, shrub, and host plant (Plantago erecta E.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Report
    Biological Resources Letter Report for the Rancho Sierra Property, APN 404-430-45 County of San Diego, California [County Project # PDS2015-TM-5601; Log No. PDS2015-ER-15-14-004] Prepared for: The County of San Diego Department of Planning and Development Services 5510 Overland Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 Project Proponent: Mr. Brad Bailey 10035 Prospect Avenue, Suite 101 Santee, CA 92071 (619)244-4979 Prepared By: Gretchen Cummings Cummings and Associates P.O. Box 1209 Ramona, CA 92065 (760)440-0349 Revised 28 December 2016 Revised 8 September 2015 Revised 1 May 2015 21 May 2014 Job Number 1698.21D SDC PDS RCVD 02-15-18 TM5601 Biological Resource Letter Report for the Rancho Sierra Property, APN 404-430-45 County of San Diego, California [County Project #PDS2015-TM-5601; Log No. PDS2015-ER-15-14-004] Prepared For: The County of San Diego Department of Planning and Development Services 5510 Overland Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 Project Proponents: Mr. Brad Bailey 10035 Prospect Ave, Suite 101 Santee, CA 92071 (619)244-4979 Prepared By: Gretchen Cummings Cummings and Associates P.O. Box 1209 Ramona, CA 92065 (760)440-0349 Revised 28 December 2016 Revised 8 September 2015 Revised 1 May 2015 21 May 2014 Job Number 1698.21D Table of Contents Summary. 3 1.0 Introduction, Project Description, Location and Setting. 3 2.0 Regional Context . 4 3.0 Habitats/Vegetation Communities . 4 4.0 Special Status Species. 6 5.0 Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waterways . 11 6.0 Other Unique Features/Resources. 11 7.0 Significance of Project Impacts and Proposed Mitigation .
    [Show full text]
  • And Mission Blue Butterfly Populations Found at Milagra Ridge and the Mission Blue Butterfly Population at Marin Headlands Are Managed by the GGNRA
    San Bruno Elfin Butterfly (Callophrys mossii bayensis) and Mission Blue Butterfly (Icaricia icarioides missionensis) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo by Patrick Kobernus: Adult male mission blue butterfly. Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento, California February 2010 5-YEAR REVIEW San Bruno Elfin Butterfly (Callophrys mossii bayensis) and Mission blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides missionensis) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Report 2017
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Biological Monitoring Program 2017 Quino Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino) Survey Report 22 June 2018 2017 Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Report TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................... 2 METHODS ............................................................................................................................ 3 PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................ 3 STUDY SITE SELECTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 SURVEY METHODS ............................................................................................................................ 6 TRAINING ........................................................................................................................................... 7 DATA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................ 7 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................. 8 SENTINEL SITE SURVEYS ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]