Alberta Lake Management Society Lakewatch 1999 Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alberta Lake Management Society Lakewatch 1999 Report Alberta Lake Management Society Lakewatch 1999 Report. Preston McEachern G208 BioSci Bldg. University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9 (780) 492-6304 1 Table of Contents 1. List of Tables. .........................................................................................................................2 2. List of Figures. ........................................................................................................................2 3. Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................2 4. Introduction.............................................................................................................................3 5. Indicators of Lake Water Quality.............................................................................................4 6. Methods ..................................................................................................................................5 7. Results ....................................................................................................................................8 Burnstick Lake ................................................................................................................8 Gull Lake.........................................................................................................................9 Driedmeat Lake .............................................................................................................10 Chestermere Lake..........................................................................................................11 Hastings Lake................................................................................................................12 8. Summary...............................................................................................................................14 9. References.............................................................................................................................15 1. List of Tables Table 1. Average concentrations of major ions, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a and other physical variables in the lakes in 1999 compared to historic data...............................................17 2. List of Figures Fig. 1: Secchi disc depths for Lakewatch lakes 1999 .................................................................18 Fig. 2: Total phosphorus concentrations for Lakewatch lakes 1999............................................19 Fig. 3: Total Kjeldahl nitrogen concentrations for Lakewatch lakes 1999 ..................................20 Fig. 4: Total chlorophyll a concentrations for Lakewatch lakes 1999.........................................21 Appendix 1: Total chlorophyll a and phosphorus concentrations for Alberta Lakes ...................22 3. Acknowledgements The Lakewatch program is made possible through the dedication of its volunteers and Alberta Environment employees. Mike Bilyk, John Willis, Doreen LeClair and Pat Mitchell from Alberta Environment were instrumental in both funding, training people and dealing with lakewatch data. Alberta Lake Management Society members Paula Siwik, Michael Agbeti, Lorelie Marks, Ron Zurawell, Jay White, Craig Taylor and Preston McEachern trained lake volunteers and collected samples. Without the dedication of these people and the interest of cottage owners, Lakewatch would not have occurred. Special thanks to Al Sosiak for providing editorial comments. 2 4. Introduction Alberta’s volunteer lake monitoring program known as Lakewatch has been an important source of water quality data for Alberta Environment and lake associations. In 1999, volunteers from lake associations, the Alberta Lake Management Society (ALMS) and Alberta Environment employees collected water samples bi-monthly from Burnstick Lake, Chestermere Lake, Driedmeat Lake, Gull Lake and Hastings Lake. This report outlines the Lakewatch program and results from the 1999 water quality survey of these five lakes. Why have a volunteer lake monitoring program? Volunteer lake monitoring programs are intended to accomplish four primary objectives for lake management: (i) They act as a platform for educating lake users about the aquatic environment; (ii) they foster and enhance public involvement in lake management; (iii) they facilitate a link between aquatic scientists and lake users; and (iv) they can provide reliable water quality data that, in the present era of funding constraints, can result in cost-saving to government programs. Volunteer monitoring programs have been implemented in several provinces in Canada and states in the U.S., where one or two of these objectives have been emphasized, but usually all four are achieved in part. In Alberta, the volunteer program known as Lakewatch has operated for eight years and collected data from 22 lakes. Volunteer programs elsewhere have become so successful that they have expanded into a principle source for lake quality data. For example, in the United States, the Missouri Volunteer Monitoring Program involves 33 volunteers monitoring 15 lakes annually. The resulting volunteer dataset was independently tested using professionally collected data and was considered highly accurate for its summer mean representation of individual lakes. The utility of volunteer programs in collecting reliable and inexpensive water quality data has been recognized by the EPA to the point that they maintain a web site with access to manuals, data reporting, and data access at http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/monitoring/ How does Lakewatch help Albertans? Much concern has been raised over the ‘pollution’ of Alberta lakes. It is a common belief that human activities, including industry, urbanization, forestry, agriculture, and residential dwellings contribute pollutants to lakes causing excessive algal growth, weeds and murky water. Lakewatch allows people to be involved in determining lake water quality so that they can make informed decisions at council meetings regarding developments that may impact their lakes. 5. Indicators of water quality: Sampling for what? Water samples are collected in Lakewatch to determine basic chemical characteristics that characterize general water quality. Though not all encompassing, the variables collected in Lakewatch are sensitive to human activities in watersheds that can cause degraded water quality. For example, nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen are important determinants of a lake's potential productivity. The concentrations of these nutrients in a lake are impacted (typically elevated) by land use changes such as increased 3 agricultural activity or livestock grazing. Increased nutrient concentrations can cause increases in undesirable algae blooms resulting in low dissolved oxygen concentrations, degraded habitat for fish and noxious smells. A large increase in nutrients over time can also warn of sewage inputs resulting in other human health issues such as increases in the protozoan Cryptosporidium. Phosphorus and Nitrogen Phosphorus and nitrogen are important nutrients limiting the growth of algae in Alberta lakes. While nitrogen usually limits agricultural plants, phosphorus is usually in shortest supply in lakes. Even a slight increase of phosphorus in a lake can, given the right conditions, promote algal blooms causing the water to turn green in the summer and impair recreational uses. When pollution containing livestock and human sewage enter lakes not only are the concentrations of phosphorus and nitrogen increased but nitrogen can become a limiting nutrient which is thought to cause blooms of toxic algae. Trophic state is based on phosphorus, nitrogen, and chlorophyll concentrations and is a useful index for rating and comparing lakes. Chlorophyll a Chlorophyll a is a photosynthetic pigment that green plants, including algae, possess enabling them to convert the sun's energy to living material. Chlorophyll a can be easily extracted from algae in the laboratory. Consequently, chlorophyll a is a good estimate of the amount of algae in the water. Chlorophyll a can be used to estimate a lake's fertility or trophic status. Lakes with high levels of chlorophyll a (26 to 75 µg/L) are usually considered fertile and are termed eutrophic. Highly productive or fertile lakes are termed hyper-eutrophic, while moderate to low productive lakes are termed mesotrophic and oligotrophic, respectively. Some highly productive lakes are dominated by larger aquatic plants rather than algae. In these lakes, chlorophyll a and nutrient values taken from water samples do not include productivity from large aquatic plants. The result, in lakes like Chestermere which are dominated by larger plants known as macrophytes, can be a lower trophic state than if macrophytes were included. Unfortunately, the productivity and nutrient cycling contributions of macrophytes are difficult to sample accurately and are therefore not typically included in trophic state indices. Secchi Disk Transparency Lakes that are clear are more attractive for recreation, whereas those that are turbid or murky are considered by lake users to have poor water quality. A measure of the transparency or clarity of the water is performed with a Secchi disk. To measure the clarity of the water, the Secchi disk is lowered down into the water column and the depth where the disk disappears is the Secchi depth. The Secchi depth in lakes with a lot of algal growth will be small while the Secchi depth in lakes with little algal growth can be very
Recommended publications
  • Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report
    Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report October 2019 i Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance 202 –9440 49th Street NW Edmonton, AB T6B 2M9 (587) 525‐6820 Email: [email protected] http://www.nswa.ab.ca The NSWA gratefully acknowledges operational funding support received from the Government of Alberta and many municipal partners. The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA) is a non‐profit society whose purpose is to protect and improve water quality and ecosystem functioning in the North Saskatchewan River watershed in Alberta. The organization is guided by a Board of Directors composed of member organizations from within the watershed. It is the designated Watershed Planning and Advisory Council (WPAC) for the North Saskatchewan River under the Government of Alberta’s Water for Life Strategy. This report was prepared by Michelle Gordy, Ph.D., David Trew, B.Sc., Denika Piggott B.Sc., Breda Muldoon, M.Sc., and J. Leah Kongsrude, M.Sc. of the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance. Cover photo credit: Kate Caldwell Suggested Citation: North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA), 2019. Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report. Prepared for the Antler Lake Stewardship Committee (ALSC) Antler Lake State of the Watershed Report Executive Summary The Antler Lake Stewardship Committee (ALSC) formed in 2015 to address issues related to lake health. Residents at the lake expressed concerns about deteriorating water quality, blue‐green algal (cyanobacteria1) blooms, proliferation of aquatic vegetation, and low lake levels. In 2016, the Antler Lake Stewardship Committee approached the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (NSWA) to prepare a State of the Watershed report.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Strathcona County Municipal Development Plan Bylaw 1-2007
    ENCLOSURE 7 BYLAW 20-2016 A BYLAW OF STRATHCONA COUNTY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, FOR THE PURPOSE OF AMENDING BYLAW 1-2007, AS AMENDED, BEING THE MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. WHEREAS it is deemed advisable to amend the Municipal Development Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of Strathcona County, duly assembled, pursuant to the authority conferred upon it by the Municipal Government Act, R.S.A. 2000 c.-M-26 and amendments thereto, enacts as follows: That Bylaw 1-2007, as amended, be further amended as follows: 1. The map titled Map #1 Fragmented County Residential Subdivisions Outside Policy Boundary is deleted and replaced with the map titled Map #1 Fragmented County Residential Subdivisions Outside Policy Boundary attached as Schedule A and forming part of this bylaw. 2. The map titled Map #1.1 Development Expansion Area is deleted and replaced with the map titled #1.1 Development Expansion Area attached as Schedule B and forming part of this bylaw. 3. The map titled Map #2 Recommended Pipeline Corridor is deleted and replaced with the map titled Map #2 Recommended Pipeline Corridor attached as Schedule C and forming part of this bylaw. 4. The map titled Map #3 Priority Environment Management Area’s (PEMA) is deleted and replaced with the map titled Map #3 Priority Environment Management Area’s (PEMA) attached as Schedule D and forming part of this bylaw. 5. The map titled Map #4 Fire Risk Model is deleted and replaced with the map titled Map #4 Fire Risk Model attached as Schedule E and forming part of this bylaw.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated View of the Grimshaw Gravels Aquifer: Subsurface Architecture and Groundwater Age Dating
    An updated view of the Grimshaw Gravels Aquifer: Subsurface architecture and groundwater age dating Greg Hartman, Jeanette Klassen, Brian Smerdon Grimshaw Gravels Groundwater Forum 11 January 2018 Outline Geological history of the Peace River Lowland Provincial Groundwater Inventory Program (PGIP) Hydrogeology of the Grimshaw gravels • Groundwater flow • Groundwater chemistry • Groundwater circulation and residence time AGS 2 Geological History of the Peace River Lowland The bench-like physiography of the Peace River Lowland is the product of successive generations of paleo-Peace Rivers Each generation of paleo-river excavated a valley and deposited gravel and sand at successively lower elevations The remnant gravel deposits left by these ancient rivers comprise important aquifers and aggregate deposits throughout the modern Peace River Lowland AGS 3 The bench-like physiography of the Peace River Lowland contrasts against the surrounding uplands AGS 4 Three main elevation groups of gravel tops indicate three levels of river incision Three gravel units at mean heights of 320 m, 220 m, and 25 m above the modern Peace River AGS 5 Regional mapping of gravel deposits (and underlying bedrock benches) Gravel unit Bedrock bench AGS 6 Evidence of glacial damming of the paleo-Peace River Delta top-sets Glaciolacustrine sediment overlying Old Fort gravel Delta foresets (equivalent to Terrace gravel) near BC-AB border Bedded clay Deltaic foresets in Grimshaw gravel near Weberville Gravel (covered) AGS 7 Regional Geological Interpretation Three benches
    [Show full text]
  • Convening Circular
    Page | 2 We acknowledge that the Diocese of Edmonton is on Treaty 6 territory, the territory of the Papaschase, and the homeland of the Métis Nation. Page | 3 Diocese of Edmonton 65th Synod Sept 29-30, 2017 Made new in Christ Contents & Agenda We acknowledge that the Diocese of Edmonton is on Treaty 6 territory, the territory of the Papaschase, and the homeland of the Métis Nation. Page | 4 TABLE of CONTENTS MAP of SYNOD FACILITIES ............................................................................................... 6 PRAYERS ................................................................................................................................. 7 MARKS of MISSION of the ANGLICAN COMMUNION ................................................. 8-9 AGENDA – Friday, September 29, 2017 ............................................................................... 10 AGENDA – Saturday, September 30, 2017 ........................................................................... 11- 12 NOMINATIONS and ELECTIONS ...................................................................................... 15 Elections Note ........................................................................................................................... 16 Nominations Guidelines........................................................................................................... 17 Nominations List ...................................................................................................................... 18 Nominations Biographies
    [Show full text]
  • North Saskatchewan Region Surface Water Quality Management Framework
    North Saskatchewan Region Surface Water Quality Management Framework A surface water quality management framework (framework) is being developed for the North Saskatchewan Region. The framework establishes an approach for monitoring and managing the cumulative impacts of human activities on water quality in the North Saskatchewan and Battle rivers. Cumulative effects management was first introduced in the North Saskatchewan Region with the Water Management Framework for the Industrial Heartland and Capital Region, which was developed in 2008 to address anticipated development in the Capital Region. At that time, government and stakeholders committed to maintaining or improving surface water quality in the stretch of the North Saskatchewan River from Devon to Pakan. Stakeholder and indigenous engagement on a Surface Water Quality Management Framework began in 2015 as a component of the North Saskatchewan Regional Plan, and continued in 2018. The current engagement will build on these initiatives and processes. Figure 1: The North Saskatchewan and Battle River Watersheds Surface Water Quality Pressures Surface Water Quality Status Rivers in the North Saskatchewan Region are relied upon for Many aspects of water quality in the North Saskatchewan source water for drinking, livestock watering, recreation, Region have improved in recent decades due to improved industry, providing healthy aquatic habitat and supporting management practices, especially wastewater treatment. traditional land use activities. However, pressure from Despite these advances, concerns for water quality in the different human activities can impact surface water quality in North Saskatchewan and Battle rivers include low dissolved the region. oxygen in the winter, nutrient enrichment, trace metals, and high sedimentation. Continuing efforts under the Water Population growth drives urban development, recreational Management Framework for the Industrial Heartland and growth, industrial growth and intensification of agricultural Capital Region are working to address these issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialized and Rural Municipalities and Their Communities
    Specialized and Rural Municipalities and Their Communities Updated December 18, 2020 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPALITIES AND THEIR COMMUNITIES MUNICIPALITY COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY STATUS SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITES Crowsnest Pass, Municipality of None Jasper, Municipality of None Lac La Biche County Beaver Lake Hamlet Hylo Hamlet Lac La Biche Hamlet Plamondon Hamlet Venice Hamlet Mackenzie County HIGH LEVEL Town RAINBOW LAKE Town Fort Vermilion Hamlet La Crete Hamlet Zama City Hamlet Strathcona County Antler Lake Hamlet Ardrossan Hamlet Collingwood Cove Hamlet Half Moon Lake Hamlet Hastings Lake Hamlet Josephburg Hamlet North Cooking Lake Hamlet Sherwood Park Hamlet South Cooking Lake Hamlet Wood Buffalo, Regional Municipality of Anzac Hamlet Conklin Hamlet Fort Chipewyan Hamlet Fort MacKay Hamlet Fort McMurray Hamlet December 18, 2020 Page 1 of 25 Gregoire Lake Estates Hamlet Janvier South Hamlet Saprae Creek Hamlet December 18, 2020 Page 2 of 25 MUNICIPALITY COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS Acadia No. 34, M.D. of Acadia Valley Hamlet Athabasca County ATHABASCA Town BOYLE Village BONDISS Summer Village ISLAND LAKE SOUTH Summer Village ISLAND LAKE Summer Village MEWATHA BEACH Summer Village SOUTH BAPTISTE Summer Village SUNSET BEACH Summer Village WEST BAPTISTE Summer Village WHISPERING HILLS Summer Village Atmore Hamlet Breynat Hamlet Caslan Hamlet Colinton Hamlet
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Stewardship in Alberta: a Directory of Stewardship Groups, Support Agencies, and Resources
    WATERSHED STEWARDSHIP IN ALBERTA: A DIRECTORY OF STEWARDSHIP GROUPS, SUPPORT AGENCIES AND RESOURCES APRIL 2005 INTRODUCTION FOREWORD This directory of WATERSHED STEWARDSHIP IN ALBERTA has been designed to begin a process to meet the needs of individuals, stewardship groups, and support agencies (including all levels of government, non- governmental organizations, and industry). From recent workshops, surveys, and consultations, community- based stewards indicated a need to be better connected with other stewards doing similar work and with supporting agencies. They need better access to information, technical assistance, funding sources, and training in recruiting and keeping volunteers. Some groups said they felt isolated and did not have a clear sense that the work they were doing was important and appreciated by society. A number of steps have occurred recently that are beginning to address some of these concerns. The Alberta Stewardship Network, for example, has been established to better connect stewards to each other and to support agencies. Collaboration with other provincial and national networks (e.g. Canada’s Stewardship Communities Network) is occurring on an on-going basis. Internet-based information sites, such as the Stewardship Canada Portal (www.stewardshipcanada.ca), are being established to provide sources of information, linkages to key organizations, and newsletters featuring success stories and progress being made by grassroots stewards. These sites are being connected provincially and nationally to keep people informed with activities across Canada. The focus of this directory is on watershed stewardship groups working in Alberta. The term ‘watershed’ is inclusive of all stewardship activities occurring on the landscape, be they water, air, land, or biodiversity-based.
    [Show full text]
  • The Methodists' Great 1869 Camp Meeting and Aboriginal Conservation Strategies in the North Saskatchewan River Valley
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for 2009 The Methodists' Great 1869 Camp Meeting and Aboriginal Conservation Strategies in The North Saskatchewan River Valley George Colpitts Department of the University of Calgary, in Alberta, Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Colpitts, George, "The Methodists' Great 1869 Camp Meeting and Aboriginal Conservation Strategies in The North Saskatchewan River Valley" (2009). Great Plains Quarterly. 1170. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/1170 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. THE METHODISTS' GREAT 1869 CAMP MEETING AND ABORIGINAL CONSERVATION STRATEGIES IN THE NORTH SASKATCHEWAN RIVER VALLEY GEORGE COLPITTS George McDougall, chairman of the Methodist gent of Wesleyan Methodists and their Native Missions to the Indians of the Northwest affiliates from Fort Edmonton, Pigeon Lake, Territories, kept a large, black book in which he Lac Ste. Anne, Lac La Biche, and Whitefish jotted sermon notes, references to classical and Lake-all located on the most northern and biblical literature and sometimes simply his itin­ westerly fringes of the northern Great Plains. eraries by horseback from Victoria, the primary Their expedition and other hunts joined by Methodist mission in the far British northwest. Protestant or Roman Catholic missions help Under the "s" tab and labeled "Saskatchewan," identify some of the strategies of competition he noted repeatedly in the 1860s the food crisis and cooperation emerging in the western boreal facing North Saskatchewan residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Age-Friendly Alberta: Strathcona County Community Profile
    Age-Friendly Alberta Strathcona County Community Profile Strathcona County’s Social Sustainability Framework identified the need for a seniors plan to prepare for shifting demographics. In response, the County developed the Older Adults Plan, approved by Council on June 30, 2009. The plan uses the community’s strength as a base for building an age-friendly and caring community that values and supports its older residents. The plan promotes aging well, with independence, by providing the right programs, services and supports to meet the needs of older adults. The development of this 15-year plan involved extensive community consultation, an analysis of Strathcona County’s older adult population, and a review of other agency, provincial and federal programs and research. As part of fulfilling the Plan’s identified strategies, a coordinating committee plans and coordinates services and programs across municipal departments and sectors. The Plan is re-visited by the County on a regular basis and consultation is on-going through the Seniors Advisory Committee, the Accessibility Advisory Committee, Family and Community Services clients and local service providers. On June 6, 2013, Strathcona County was the first community Older Adults Plan Vision to receive the Age-Friendly Alberta Recognition Award. Strathcona County is an age-friendly and caring community that values the contributions and strengths of older adults, is responsive to their diverse needs and desire for choice, and provides a spectrum of opportunities for active and purposeful lives. Strathcona County, a specialized municipality Classified as a specialized municipality, Strathcona County consists of the urban area of Sherwood Park and an extensive rural area which includes eight rural hamlets.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Update September 2019
    Economic Update September 2019 March 2018 Presentation Overview 1. Demographic Overview 2. Building Permits and Housing Prices 3. Updates for commercial, residential, office and retail 4. Updates for projects in Strathcona Industrial Area and Alberta Industrial Heartland 5. Summary and Predictions for 2019 9/27/2019 2 DEMOGRAPHICS 9/27/2019 3 Population 98,381 71,332 urban 27,049 rural 2.9% over three years 1% per year 20189/27/2019 Municipal Census results, Strathcona County 4 Strathcona County Fast Facts Urban and Rural Mix 71,332/27,049 • Sherwood Park • Ardrossan • South Cooking Lake • Antler Lake • North Cooking Lake • Collingwood Cove • Hastings Lake • Josephburg 9/27/2019 5 Work Commute 65% 50% Residents Non-residents 20169/27/2019 census results 6 18,650 into SC 9/27/2019 7 9/27/2019 8 Average Household Income $160,655 50.7% of total households in Strathcona County $ had income of $125,000 or higher Average income of Economic Families $188,347 20169/27/2019 McSweeney report 9 People per household 2.7 2.6 for Alberta 2.4 for Canada 20169/27/2019 census results 10 Age 39.2 Average in Canada is 41 20169/27/2019 census results 11 Building Permit Values 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 Residential House Pricing 2019 9/27/2019 16 Fast Facts and Stats Tax Information: Non Residential 64% Residential 36% Tax Increase 2019 0.83% Projected tax rate increases: 1.13 – 2020 1.03 – 2021 0.42 – 2022 9/27/2019 17 COMMERCIAL 9/27/2019 18 HOUSEHOLD SPENDING POWER $5.6 billion 9/27/2019 19 Retail Market Supply TOTAL 4.1 million sf VACANT 226,035 sf VACANCY RATE ~6% Source:9/27/2019 Thomas Consulting Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophic State of Alberta Lakes Based on Average Total Phosphorus
    Created Feb 2013 TROPHIC STATE OF ALBERTA LAKES Based On Average (May-October) Total Phosphorus Concentrations Total Phosphorus (µg/L) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 * Adamson Lake Alix Lake * Amisk Lake * Angling Lake Oligotrophic * ‡ Antler Lake Arm Lake (Low Productivity) * Astotin Lake (<10 µg/L) * ‡ Athabasca (Lake) - Off Delta Baptiste Lake - North Basin Baptiste Lake - South Basin * ‡ Bare Creek Res. Mesotrophic * ‡ Barrier Lake ‡ Battle Lake (Moderate Productivity) * † Battle River Res. (Forestburg) (10 - 35 µg/L) Beartrap Lake Beauvais Lake Beaver Lake * Bellevue Lake Eutrophic * † Big Lake - East Basin * † Big Lake - West Basin (High Productivity) * Blackfalds Lake (35 - 100 µg/L) * † Blackmud Lake * ‡ Blood Indian Res. Bluet (South Garnier Lake) ‡ Bonnie Lake Hypereutrophic † Borden Lake * ‡ Bourque Lake (Very High Productivity) ‡ Buck Lake (>100 µg/L) Buffalo Lake - Main Basin Buffalo Lake - Secondary Bay * † Buffalo Lake (By Boyle) † Burntstick Lake Calling Lake * † Capt Eyre Lake † Cardinal Lake * ‡ Carolside Res. - Berry Creek Res. † Chain Lakes Res. - North Basin † Chain Lakes Res.- South Basin Chestermere Lake * † Chickakoo Lake * † Chickenhill Lake * Chin Coulee Res. * Clairmont Lake Clear (Barns) Lake Clear Lake ‡ Coal Lake * ‡ Cold Lake - English Bay ‡ Cold Lake - West Side ‡ Cooking Lake † Cow Lake * Crawling Valley Res. Crimson Lake Crowsnest Lake * † Cutbank Lake Dillberry Lake * Driedmeat Lake ‡ Eagle Lake ‡ Elbow Lake Elkwater Lake Ethel Lake * Fawcett Lake * † Fickle Lake * † Figure Eight Lake * Fishing Lake * Flyingshot Lake * Fork Lake * ‡ Fox Lake Res. Frog Lake † Garner Lake Garnier Lake (North) * George Lake * † Ghost Res. - Inside Bay * † Ghost Res. - Inside Breakwater ‡ Ghost Res. - Near Cochrane * Gleniffer Lake (Dickson Res.) * † Glenmore Res.
    [Show full text]
  • PP2 - Lakes, Reservoirs and Ponds Waterbody Waterbody Detail Season Bait WALL NRPK YLPR LKWH BURB Trout Total L = Bait Allowed Arm Lake OPEN MAY 15 to MAR
    Legend: As examples, ‘3 over 63 cm’ indicates a possession and size limit of ‘3 fish each over 63 cm’ or ‘10 fish’ indicates a possession limit of 10 for that species of any size. An empty cell indicates the species is not likely present at that waterbody; however, if caught the default regulations for the Watershed Unit apply. SHL=Special Harvest Licence, BKTR = Brook Trout, BNTR=Brown Trout, BURB = Burbot, CISC = Cisco, CTTR = Cutthroat Trout, DLVR = Dolly Varden, GOLD = Goldeye, LKTR = Lake Trout, LKWH = Lake Whitefish, MNWH = Mountain Whitefish, NRPK = Northern Pike, RNTR = Rainbow Trout, SAUG = Sauger, TGTR = Tiger Trout, WALL = Walleye, YLPR = Yellow Perch. Regulation changes are highlighted blue. Waterbodies closed to angling are highlighted grey. PP2 - Lakes, Reservoirs and Ponds Waterbody Waterbody Detail Season Bait WALL NRPK YLPR LKWH BURB Trout Total l = Bait allowed Arm Lake OPEN MAY 15 TO MAR. 31 l 3 over 15 fish 63 cm Battle Lake Portion west of the west boundary of section 22-46-2-W5; OPEN JUNE 1 TO MAR. 31 l 0 fish 0 fish 5 fish 10 fish 2 fish; but limit Includes tributaries and outlet downstream to Sec. Rd. 771 is 0 from Feb. 1 to Mar. 31 Remainder of the lake OPEN MAY 15 TO MAR. 31 l 0 fish 0 fish 5 fish 10 fish 2 fish; but limit is 0 from Feb. 1 to Mar. 31 Berry Creek (Carolside) Reservoir 27-12-W4 OPEN MAY 15 TO MAR. 31 l 1 fish 45-50 1 fish 15 fish cm 63-70 cm Big Lake Includes tributaries OPEN MAY 15 TO MAR.
    [Show full text]