DOCSLIB.ORG

2015 All-Hazards Mitigation Plan Update for New Castle County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015 All-Hazards Mitigation Plan Update for New Castle County 2015 All‐Hazards Mitigation Plan Update for New Castle County, Delaware (includes municipalities and the University of Delaware) Prepared for: Prepared by: New Castle County Office of Emergency Vision Planning and Consulting, LLC Management 7572 Morris Street NCC Dept. of Public Safety Fulton, MD 20759 3601 N. DuPont Hwy, New Castle, DE 19720 February 2015 T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 1. I NTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Background 1 1.3 Purpose 3 1.4 Scope 4 1.5 Authority 5 1.6 Organization of the Plan 5 2. P LANNING P ROCESS 2.1 Introduction 6 2.2 Overview of Hazard Mitigation Planning 6 2.3 Preparing the Plan 7 2.4 Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee 8 2.5 Community Meetings and Workshops 10 2.6 Involving the Public 13 2.7 Involving Stakeholders 14 2.8 Multi-jurisdictional Participation 16 3. C OMMUNITY P ROFILE 3.1 Introduction 18 3.2 Geography and the Environment 18 3.3 Population and Demographics 19 3.4 Housing, Infrastructure and Land Use 20 3.5 Employment and Industry 22 3.6 Disaster Declarations 24 4.1 H AZARD IDENTIFICATION 4.1.1 Introduction 26 4.1.2 Flood 27 4.1.3 Hurricanes and Coastal Storms 29 T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 4.1.4 Severe Thunderstorms and Tornadoes 34 4.1.5 Wildfire 40 4.1.6 Drought/Extreme Heat 41 4.1.7 Hail 43 4.1.8 Winter Storms and Freezes 44 4.1.9 Erosion 44 4.1.10 Dam/Levee Failure 45 4.1.11 Earthquakes, Sinkholes and Landslides 46 4.1.12 Tsunami 52 4.1.13 Volcanoes 53 4.1.14 Terrorism 54 4.1.15 Contamination 54 4.1.16 Energy Release 55 4.1.17 Disruption of Service 55 4.1.18 Weapons of Mass Destruction 55 4.1.19 Hazardous Materials (HazMat) 56 4.1.20 Energy Pipeline Failure 56 4.2 H AZARD A NALYSIS 4.2.1 Introduction 59 4.2.2 Flood 60 4.2.3 Hurricanes and Tropical Storms 68 4.2.4 Thunderstorms 73 4.2.5 Tornadoes 78 4.2.6 Wildfire 81 4.2.7 Drought 81 4.2.8 Extreme Temperature 81 4.2.9 Hail 83 4.2.10 Winter Storms 86 4.2.11 Coastal Erosion 89 4.2.12 Dam/Levee Failure 90 4.2.13 Earthquakes 92 4.2.14 Landslides and Sinkholes 94 T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 4.2.15 Tsunami 94 4.2.16 Volcanoes 94 4.2.17 Terrorism 94 4.2.18 Hazardous Materials (HazMat) 95 4.2.19 Energy Pipeline Failure 95 4.2.20 Probability of Future Events in New Castle County 95 4.2.21 University of Delaware Hazard Analysis Summary 95 4.3 V ULNERABILITY A SSESSMENT 4.3.1 Introduction 98 4.3.2 Explanation of HAZUS-MH Risk Assessment Methodology 98 4.3.3 Explanation of Regional Vulnerability Assessment Methodology 99 5. C APABILITY A SSESSMENT 5.1 Introduction 148 5.2 What is a Municipal Capability Assessment? 148 5.3 Capability Assessment Update 149 5.4 Capability Assessment Findings 149 5.5 Conclusions on Local Capability 166 5.6 Document Review 168 6.1 M ITIGATION S TRATEGY 6.1.1 Update Process Summary 196 6.1.2 Introduction 196 6.1.3 Mission Statement 197 6.1.4 Mitigation Goals 197 6.1.5 Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Measures 199 6.1.6 Mitigation Techniques in the New Castle Planning Area 201 T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 6.2 L OCALLY- SPECIFIC M ITIGATION A CTIONS 6.2.1 Introduction 203 6.2.2 Review of Current and Completed Hazard Mitigation Actions 203 6.2.3 Prioritization 218 6.2.4 Mitigation Action Plan 230 7. P LAN M AINTENANCE P ROCEDURES 7.1 Introduction 285 7.2 Implementation 285 7.3 Evaluation and Enhancement 286 7.4 Continued Public Involvement 287 8. A PPENDIX All Hazard Mitigation Plan – Acknowledgements STATE OF DELAWARE James E. Turner, III, Director, Delaware Emergency Management Agency David Carlson, Planner, Delaware Emergency Management Agency Michael Powell, DNREC, State NFIP Coordinator Mark Seifert, University of Delaware Public Safety NEW CASTLE COUNTY Thomas P. Gordon, County Executive Joseph Bryant, Jr., Director of Public Safety Dave Carpenter, Jr., Coordinator of Emergency Management John Gysling, Land Use Floodplain Manager CITY OF WILMINGTON George Giles, Emergency Management Director MAYORS Delaware City – Stanley E. Green Elsmere – Steven Burg Middletown – Kenneth L. Branner, Jr. New Castle – Donald A. Reese Newark – Polly Sierer Newport – Michael Spencer Odessa – Kathleen H. Harvey Townsend – Jermaine D. Hatton Wilmington – Dennis P. Williams 1. I NTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction In an effort to reduce the Nation's mounting losses from natural disasters, the United States Congress passed the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) to provide new and revitalized approaches to mitigation planning. Section 322 of DMA 2000 emphasizes the need for state and local entities to closely coordinate mitigation planning and makes the development of a hazard mitigation plan a specific eligibility requirement for any local government applying for Federal mitigation grant funds. These funds include the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and the newly created Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) program, both of which are administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Communities with an adopted and Federally approved hazard mitigation plan thereby become pre-positioned and more apt to receive available mitigation funds before and after the next disaster strikes. This 2015 Plan Update is conducted in coordination with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Delaware Emergency Management Agency (DEMA) to ensure that it meets all applicable DMA 2000 planning requirements. A Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool, located in this document, provides a summary of FEMA’s current minimum standards of acceptability and notes the location within the Plan where each planning requirement is met. This Chapter provides a general introduction to the 2015 New Castle County Multi-jurisdictional All Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. It is comprised of the following sections: Background, Purpose, Scope, Authority, and Organization of the Plan. 1.2 Background The occurrence of natural hazards, such as floods, tornadoes and severe winter storms is inevitable, and while there is little that can be done to control their force and intensity, a lot can be done to be better prepared to face these hazards. New Castle County is vulnerable to a wide range of natural hazards, including flooding, tornadoes, tropical storms and hurricanes, and winterstorms. It is also vulnerable to a variety of human- caused hazards, including chemical releases, spills or explosions associated with the fixed storage or mobile transport of hazardous materials. These hazards threaten the life and safety of county residents, and have the potential to damage or destroy both public and private property and disrupt the local economy and overall quality of life. While the threat from hazardous events can never be fully eliminated, there is much we can do to lessen their potential impact upon our community and our citizens. By minimizing the impact of hazards upon our built environment, we can prevent such events from becoming disasters. The concept and practice of reducing risks to people and property from known hazards is generally referred to as hazard mitigation. Hazard Mitigation is defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as “sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to Chapter 1: Page 1 I NTRODUCTION 2015 N EW C ASTLE C OUNTY H AZARD M ITIGATION P LAN U PDATE people and property from hazards and their effects”. The hazard mitigation planning process involves the coordination of actions taken to reduce injuries, deaths, property damage, economic losses, and degradation of natural resources caused by natural and man-made disasters. Hazard mitigation is one of four phases in the emergency management cycle. Others include: emergency preparedness, emergency response, and recovery. Hazard mitigation activities involve actions that reduce or eliminate the probability of an occurrence or reduce the impact of a disaster. The goal of the mitigation phase is to make communities more resistant to disasters and thereby decrease the need for a response. Mitigation planning occurs long before a disaster occurs. Preparedness activities include planning and preparing for when a disaster strikes and includes response capability actions to ensure an effective and efficient use of resources and efforts to minimize damage. Preparedness occurs just before a disaster occurs. Emergency response activities include providing emergency assistance to victims and minimizing property loss. The response phase begins during or immediately after the onset of a disaster occurs. Recovery activities include short- and long-term activities that help return individuals and communities to normalcy as soon as possible. Recovery actions involve clean-up efforts, temporary housing, and replacement of infrastructure. Recovery activities typically commence several days or weeks after a disaster occurs and are long-term in nature. Hazard mitigation techniques include both structural measures, such as strengthening or protecting buildings and infrastructure from the destructive forces of potential hazards, and non-structural measures, such as the adoption of sound land use policies and the creation of public awareness programs. It is widely accepted that the most effective mitigation measures are implemented at the local government level, where decisions on the regulation and control of development are ultimately made. A comprehensive mitigation approach addresses past and future hazard vulnerabilities, making it essential for future growth to take place in a manner that decreases a community’s overall hazard vulnerability. One of the most effective means that a community can implement a comprehensive approach to hazard mitigation is to develop, adopt, and update a local hazard mitigation plan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2014 North Atlantic Hurricane Season Review
    2014 North Atlantic Hurricane Season Review WHITEPAPER Executive Summary The 2014 Atlantic hurricane season was a quiet season, closing with eight 2014 marks the named storms, six hurricanes, and two major hurricanes (Category 3 or longest period on stronger). record – nine Forecast groups predicted that the formation of El Niño and below consecutive years average sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in the Atlantic Main – that no major Development Region (MDR)1 through the season would inhibit hurricanes made development in 2014, leading to a below average season. While 2014 landfall over the was indeed quiet, these predictions didn’t materialize. U.S. The scientific community has attributed the low activity in 2014 to a number of oceanic and atmospheric conditions, predominantly anomalously low Atlantic mid-level moisture, anomalously high tropical Atlantic subsidence (sinking air) in the Main Development Region (MDR), and strong wind shear across the Caribbean. Tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic basin was also influenced by below average activity in the 2014 West African monsoon season, which suppressed the development of African easterly winds. The year 2014 marks the longest period on record – nine consecutive years since Hurricane Wilma in 2005 – that no major hurricanes made landfall over the U.S., and also the ninth consecutive year that no hurricane made landfall over the coastline of Florida. The U.S. experienced only one landfalling hurricane in 2014, Hurricane Arthur. Arthur made landfall over the Outer Banks of North Carolina as a Category 2 hurricane on July 4, causing minor damage. While Mexico and Central America were impacted by two landfalling storms and the Caribbean by three, Bermuda suffered the most substantial damage due to landfalling storms in 2014.Hurricane Fay and Major Hurricane Gonzalo made landfall on the island within a week of each other, on October 12 and October 18, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane and Tropical Storm
    State of New Jersey 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 5. Risk Assessment 5.8 Hurricane and Tropical Storm 2014 Plan Update Changes The 2014 Plan Update includes tropical storms, hurricanes and storm surge in this hazard profile. In the 2011 HMP, storm surge was included in the flood hazard. The hazard profile has been significantly enhanced to include a detailed hazard description, location, extent, previous occurrences, probability of future occurrence, severity, warning time and secondary impacts. New and updated data and figures from ONJSC are incorporated. New and updated figures from other federal and state agencies are incorporated. Potential change in climate and its impacts on the flood hazard are discussed. The vulnerability assessment now directly follows the hazard profile. An exposure analysis of the population, general building stock, State-owned and leased buildings, critical facilities and infrastructure was conducted using best available SLOSH and storm surge data. Environmental impacts is a new subsection. 5.8.1 Profile Hazard Description A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 2013a). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Strike!
    Your Name(s): ____________________________ Hurricane Strike! Goto The Hurricane Strike Learning Module at http://www.meted.ucar.edu/hurrican/strike/index.htm Here’s a youtube introduction to the Hurricane Strike Environment. (5 minutes) (note: the video and this document assume that you are using the multimedia version of this activity. Some students prefer the text version. ) Science Worksheet 1 (select Sunday) Watch the Weather Channel News Flash (on the Castillos’ TV) and look in Storm Track (on the Castillos’ laptop computer) to answer questions 1–3: 1. Where was Tropical Storm Erin at 8:00 PM on Sunday, July 30th? (Fill in the blanks with latitude and longitude numbers and identify N, S, E, or W for each. If you have a tracking chart, plot the location.) Latitude: __ __ . __ N S E W Longitude: __ __ . __ N S E W 2. Which place was closest to the center of Tropical Storm Erin? (identify one) Cuba Florida Mexico The Turks & Caicos 3. Tropical Storm Erin’s winds are gusting to 60 mph. How many kilometers per hour (kph) is that, if 1 mph equals 1.61 kph? _______ kph Look in Hurricanes and tropical Cyclones to answer questions 4–11: 4. Tropical storms that begin in the Atlantic Ocean north of the equator form near the … (identify one) Tropic of Cancer Tropic of Capricorn 5. Hurricanes can’t strike places in the northern part of the U.S., like New York. (identify one) TRUE FALSE 6. If you lived in Japan, what would you call hurricanes? (Fill in the blank.) _______________________________ 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1
    Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1: Historical Pier Damage in Florida Ralph R. Clark Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems May 2010 Table of Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... ii Chapter 1 – Introduction................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 – Ocean and Gulf Pier Damages in Florida................................................... 4 Chapter 3 – Three Major Hurricanes of the Late 1970’s............................................... 6 September 23, 1975 – Hurricane Eloise ...................................................................... 6 September 3, 1979 – Hurricane David ........................................................................ 6 September 13, 1979 – Hurricane Frederic.................................................................. 7 Chapter 4 – Two Hurricanes and Four Storms of the 1980’s........................................ 8 June 18, 1982 – No Name Storm.................................................................................. 8 November 21-24, 1984 – Thanksgiving Storm............................................................ 8 August 30-September 1, 1985 – Hurricane Elena ...................................................... 9 October 31,
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • ! 1! NASA's Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) Investigation
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20170005486 2019-08-31T16:22:19+00:00Z 1! NASA’s Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) Investigation 2! 3! Scott A. Braun, Paul A. Newman, Gerald M. Heymsfield 4! NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 5! 6! Submitted to Bulletin of the American Meteor. Society 7! October 14, 2015 8! 9! 10! 11! Corresponding author: Scott A. Braun, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 612, 12! Greenbelt, MD 20771 13! Email: [email protected] 14! ! 1! 15! Abstract 16! The National Aeronautics and Space Administrations’s (NASA) Hurricane and Severe Storm 17! Sentinel (HS3) investigation was a multi-year field campaign designed to improve understanding 18! of the physical processes that control hurricane formation and intensity change, specifically the 19! relative roles of environmental and inner-core processes. Funded as part of NASA’s Earth 20! Venture program, HS3 conducted five-week campaigns during the hurricane seasons of 2012-14 21! using the NASA Global Hawk aircraft, along with a second Global Hawk in 2013 and a WB-57f 22! aircraft in 2014. Flying from a base at Wallops Island, Virginia, the Global Hawk could be on 23! station over storms for up to 18 hours off the East Coast of the U.S. to about 6 hours off the 24! western coast of Africa. Over the three years, HS3 flew 21 missions over 9 named storms, along 25! with flights over two non-developing systems and several Saharan Air Layer (SAL) outbreaks. 26! This article summarizes the HS3 experiment, the missions flown, and some preliminary findings 27! related to the rapid intensification and outflow structure of Hurricane Edouard (2014) and the 28! interaction of Hurricane Nadine (2012) with the SAL.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Facilities Fire Stations Government Buildings Schools/Shelters Hospital and Health Care Facilities Utilities Water/Wast
    Critical Facilities Fire Stations Government Buildings Schools/Shelters Hospital and Health Care Facilities Utilities Water/Wastewater Airports Power Substations Power Plants Gas Transmission Current Natural Gas Line Map Year Title Federal Disaster Declarations 1968 Hurricane Gladys 1977 Severe Winter Weather 1990 Severe Freeze 1993 Tornadoes, Flooding, High Winds & Tides, Freezing 1996 Tropical Storm Josephine 1998 Extreme Fire Hazard 1998 Severe Storms, High Winds, Tornadoes, and Flooding 2000 Withlacoochee Fire Complex 2001 Severe Freeze 2004 Severe Storms and Flooding 2004 Hurricane Frances 2004 Hurricane Ivan 2004 Hurricane Jeanne 2004 Tropical Storm Bonnie and Hurricane Charley 2005 Hurricane Katrina Evacuation 2008 Tropical Storm Fay 2012 Tropical Storm Debby 2016 Hurricane Hermine 2016 Hurricane Matthew 2017 Hurricane Irma 2018 Hurricane Michael Hazards Expo Survey Results (10 respondents) • Flooding, Severe Storms and Hurricanes were highest priority hazards. • Most respondents plan to rebuild after a disaster, but some plan to sell their homes and relocate. • Respondents saw preparedness and education as more important than infrastructure projects. Flood • A flood or flooding refers to the general or temporary conditions of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from the overflow of inland or tidal water and of surface water runoff from any source (SHMP) Year Storm Source Tropical Cyclone 1968 Hurricane Gladys Federal Disaster Declaration 2004 Hurricane Frances Federal Disaster Declaration • A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized 2004 Hurricane Ivan Federal Disaster Declaration system of clouds and 2004 Hurricane Jeanne Federal Disaster Declaration thunderstorms that 2004 Tropical storm Bonnie and Hurricane Federal Disaster Declaration originates over Charley tropical or subtropical waters and has a 2005 Hurricane Katrina Evacuation Federal Disaster Declaration closed low-level 2016 Hurricane Hermine Federal Disaster Declaration circulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms, 1871-1993: an Historical Survey, the Only Books Or Reports Exclu- Sively on Florida Hurricanes Were R.W
    3. 2b -.I 3 Contents List of Tables, Figures, and Plates, ix Foreword, xi Preface, xiii Chapter 1. Introduction, 1 Chapter 2. Historical Discussion of Florida Hurricanes, 5 1871-1900, 6 1901-1930, 9 1931-1960, 16 1961-1990, 24 Chapter 3. Four Years and Billions of Dollars Later, 36 1991, 36 1992, 37 1993, 42 1994, 43 Chapter 4. Allison to Roxanne, 47 1995, 47 Chapter 5. Hurricane Season of 1996, 54 Appendix 1. Hurricane Preparedness, 56 Appendix 2. Glossary, 61 References, 63 Tables and Figures, 67 Plates, 129 Index of Named Hurricanes, 143 Subject Index, 144 About the Authors, 147 Tables, Figures, and Plates Tables, 67 1. Saffir/Simpson Scale, 67 2. Hurricane Classification Prior to 1972, 68 3. Number of Hurricanes, Tropical Storms, and Combined Total Storms by 10-Year Increments, 69 4. Florida Hurricanes, 1871-1996, 70 Figures, 84 l A-I. Great Miami Hurricane 2A-B. Great Lake Okeechobee Hurricane 3A-C.Great Labor Day Hurricane 4A-C. Hurricane Donna 5. Hurricane Cleo 6A-B. Hurricane Betsy 7A-C. Hurricane David 8. Hurricane Elena 9A-C. Hurricane Juan IOA-B. Hurricane Kate 1 l A-J. Hurricane Andrew 12A-C. Hurricane Albert0 13. Hurricane Beryl 14A-D. Hurricane Gordon 15A-C. Hurricane Allison 16A-F. Hurricane Erin 17A-B. Hurricane Jerry 18A-G. Hurricane Opal I9A. 1995 Hurricane Season 19B. Five 1995 Storms 20. Hurricane Josephine , Plates, X29 1. 1871-1880 2. 1881-1890 Foreword 3. 1891-1900 4. 1901-1910 5. 1911-1920 6. 1921-1930 7. 1931-1940 These days, nothing can escape the watchful, high-tech eyes of the National 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations and Analyses of Upper Ocean Responses to Tropical Storms and Hurricanes in the Vicinity of Bermuda W
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113, C08009, doi:10.1029/2007JC004358, 2008 Click Here for Full Article Observations and analyses of upper ocean responses to tropical storms and hurricanes in the vicinity of Bermuda W. J. Black1 and T. D. Dickey1 Received 6 June 2007; revised 10 December 2007; accepted 11 February 2008; published 6 August 2008. [1] A circular region within a radius of 400 km of Bermuda has been struck by 188 tropical storms or hurricanes from 1851 through 2005 and by 20 since 1995. Here we describe new direct and remote sensing observations and analyses of recent events near the Bermuda Testbed Mooring including Hurricane Fabian (2003), Tropical Storm Harvey (2005) and Hurricane Nate (2005). The most impressive upper ocean response of the recent events was produced by Hurricane Fabian when SST cooling exceeded 3.5°C, vertical mixing occurred to a depth of greater than 130 m, and upper ocean currents reached 100 cm sÀ1. Fabian also triggered an ocean color event visible in SeaWiFS satellite images. Related implications include improved estimates of the roles of tropical cyclones in driving meridional overturning circulation (MOC) and testing of hypotheses concerning warming of the tropical oceans which could cause more intense tropical storms and hurricanes. Citation: Black, W. J., and T. D. Dickey (2008), Observations and analyses of upper ocean responses to tropical storms and hurricanes in the vicinity of Bermuda, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C08009, doi:10.1029/2007JC004358. 1. Introduction infer wind speed, sea surface temperature, sea surface and wave height, and ocean color is proving to be extremely [2] Recent hurricane events such as those observed dur- valuable, but there are serious limitations such as restriction ing the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, and in particular to surface expressions, cloudiness, and measurement reso- Hurricane Katrina, have focused the attention of both the lution [e.g., Babin et al., 2004; Scharroo et al., 2005; Son et scientific community and society in general on the connec- al., 2006].
    [Show full text]
  • Development of an Objective Scheme to Estimate Tropical Cyclone Intensity from Digital Geostationary Satellite Infrared Imagery
    172 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 13 Development of an Objective Scheme to Estimate Tropical Cyclone Intensity from Digital Geostationary Satellite Infrared Imagery CHRISTOPHER S. VELDEN AND TIMOTHY L. OLANDER Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, Madison, Wisconsin RAYMOND M. ZEHR Regional and Mesoscale Meteorology Branch, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, Colorado (Manuscript received 17 July 1996, in ®nal form 10 August 1997) ABSTRACT The standard method for estimating the intensity of tropical cyclones is based on satellite observations (Dvorak technique) and is utilized operationally by tropical analysis centers around the world. The technique relies on image pattern recognition along with analyst interpretation of empirically based rules regarding the vigor and organization of convection surrounding the storm center. While this method performs well enough in most cases to be employed operationally, there are situations when analyst judgment can lead to discrepancies between different analysis centers estimating the same storm. In an attempt to eliminate this subjectivity, a computer-based algorithm that operates objectively on digital infrared information has been developed. An original version of this algorithm (engineered primarily by the third author) has been signi®cantly modi®ed and advanced to include selected ``Dvorak rules,'' additional constraints, and a time-averaging scheme. This modi®ed version, the Objective Dvorak Technique (ODT), is applicable to tropical cyclones that have attained tropical storm or hurricane strength. The performance of the ODT is evaluated on cases from the 1995 and 1996 Atlantic hurricane seasons. Reconnaissance aircraft measurements of minimum surface pressure are used to validate the satellite-based estimates. Statistical analysis indicates the technique to be competitive with, and in some cases superior to, the Dvorak-based intensity estimates produced operationally by satellite analysts from tropical analysis centers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spread of Tropical Storm Tracks in Three Versions of NCEP's Global
    JUNE 2019 C O L B Y 577 The Spread of Tropical Storm Tracks in Three Versions of NCEP’s Global Ensemble Model: Focus on Hurricane Edouard (2014) FRANK P. COLBY JR. University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts (Manuscript received 7 September 2018, in final form 11 March 2019) ABSTRACT Since 2012, the National Centers for Environmental Prediction’s Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) has undergone two major upgrades. Version 11 was introduced in December 2015, with a new dynamic scheme, improved physics, increased horizontal and vertical resolution, and a more accurate initialization method. Prior to implementation, retrospective model runs over four years were made, covering multiple hurricane seasons. The second major upgrade was implemented in May 2016, when the data assimilation system for the de- terministic Global Forecast System (GFS) was upgraded. Because the GEFS initialization is taken from the deterministic GFS, this upgrade had a direct impact on the GEFS. Unlike the previous upgrade, the model was rerun for only a few tropical cyclones. Hurricane Edouard (2014) was the storm for which the most retrospective runs (4) were made for the new data assimilation system. In this paper, the impact of the GEFS upgrades is examined using seasonal data for the 2014–17 hurricane seasons, and detailed data from the four model runs made for Hurricane Edouard. Both upgrades reduced the spread between ensemble member tracks. The first upgrade reduced the spread but did not reduce the likelihood that the actual track would be included in the family of member tracks. The second upgrade both reduced the spread further and reduced the chance that the real storm track would be within the envelope of member tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Case Simulations of Hurricane–Ocean Interaction Using a High
    VOLUME 128 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW APRIL 2000 Real-Case Simulations of Hurricane±Ocean Interaction Using A High-Resolution Coupled Model: Effects on Hurricane Intensity MORRIS A. BENDER NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey ISAAC GINIS Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island (Manuscript received 13 July 1998, in ®nal form 2 April 1999) ABSTRACT In order to investigate the effect of tropical cyclone±ocean interaction on the intensity of observed hurricanes, the GFDL movable triply nested mesh hurricane model was coupled with a high-resolution version of the 1 Princeton Ocean Model. The ocean model had /68 uniform resolution, which matched the horizontal resolution of the hurricane model in its innermost grid. Experiments were run with and without inclusion of the coupling for two cases of Hurricane Opal (1995) and one case of Hurricane Gilbert (1988) in the Gulf of Mexico and two cases each of Hurricanes Felix (1995) and Fran (1996) in the western Atlantic. The results con®rmed the conclusions suggested by the earlier idealized studies that the cooling of the sea surface induced by the tropical cyclone will have a signi®cant impact on the intensity of observed storms, particularly for slow moving storms where the SST decrease is greater. In each of the seven forecasts, the ocean coupling led to substantial im- provements in the prediction of storm intensity measured by the storm's minimum sea level pressure. Without the effect of coupling the GFDL model incorrectly forecasted 25-hPa deepening of Gilbert as it moved across the Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]