DOCSLIB.ORG

Superensemble Forecasts of Hurricane Track and Intensity Using a Suite of Mesoscale Models Melanie A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Superensemble Forecasts of Hurricane Track and Intensity Using a Suite of Mesoscale Models Melanie A Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2008 Superensemble Forecasts of Hurricane Track and Intensity Using a Suite of Mesoscale Models Melanie A. Kramer Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES SUPERENSEMBLE FORECASTS OF HURRICANE TRACK AND INTENSITY USING A SUITE OF MESOSCALE MODELS By MELANIE A. KRAMER A Thesis submitted to the Department of Meteorology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2008 The members of the Committee approve the Thesis of Melanie A. Kramer defended on May 23, 2008. _________________________ T.N. Krishnamurti Professor Directing Thesis _________________________ Robert Hart Committee Member _________________________ Paul Ruscher Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge my major professor, Dr. T.N. Krishnamurti, for all of his instruction and guidance. The many meetings with my other committee members, Dr. Robert Hart and Dr. Paul Ruscher, provided new and beneficial insight into different aspects of this project, for which I am most grateful. Their comments helped me to learn a great deal about modeling and kept me interested in studying hurricanes. Thanks to the Krishnamurti lab, specifically Mrinal Biswas, Dr. Sandeep Pattnaik, Dr. Arindam Chakraborty, and Dr. Lydia Stefanova for the countless hours of instruction and assistance in this research process, for which I am greatly indebted. Thank you also to the many who have gone before me helping me in writing, formatting, and getting through. Lastly thank you to all who supported me and helped me to remember that science can and will always be fun. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables .................................................................................... vi List of Figures .................................................................................... vii List of Abbreviations............................................................................... xiii Abstract .......................................................................................... xv 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Thesis Objectives........................................... 1 1.2 Previous Work .......................................................................... 2 1.3 Organization of Thesis.............................................................. 6 2. SUPERENSEMBLE METHODOLOGY ............................................. 8 2.1 History of the Florida State Superensemble ............................. 8 2.2 Description of the Florida State Superensemble....................... 10 2.3 Model Description ..................................................................... 13 2.3.1 WRFA .............................................................................. 14 2.3.2 WRFB .............................................................................. 16 2.3.3 MM5................................................................................. 16 2.3.4 HWRF.............................................................................. 18 2.4 Large Scale Model Description ................................................. 20 2.4.1 OFCI, PERS .................................................................... 21 2.4.2 A90E, A98E, A9UK.......................................................... 22 2.4.3 GFSI ................................................................................ 22 2.4.4 SHF5................................................................................ 22 2.4.5 CLIP, CLP5...................................................................... 23 2.4.6 GFDL ............................................................................... 23 2.4.7 DSHP............................................................................... 26 2.5 Description of FSSE Experiments............................................. 28 3. OVERALL RESULTS AND ERROR METHODOLOGY..................... 32 3.1 Error Calculation Methodology.................................................. 32 3.2 Overall Errors............................................................................ 34 3.3 Discussion ................................................................................ 38 iv 4. YEARLY ERROR RESULTS............................................................. 40 4.1 2004 Errors ............................................................................... 40 4.2 2005 Errors ............................................................................... 45 4.3 2006 Errors ............................................................................... 49 4.4 Discussion ................................................................................ 52 5. INDIVIDUAL STORMS AND MODEL DISCUSSION ........................ 54 5.1 Overview................................................................................... 54 5.2 Hurricane Ivan .......................................................................... 54 5.3 Hurricane Gordon ..................................................................... 62 5.4 Hurricane Helene...................................................................... 67 5.5 Hurricane Isaac......................................................................... 72 5.6 FSSE Mesoscale and Large Scale Model Run Comparisons ... 78 5.7 Limitations of Tropical Cyclone Modeling.................................. 81 6. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK............................................ 83 6.1 Conclusions .............................................................................. 83 6.2 Future Work .............................................................................. 86 REFERENCES .................................................................................... 91 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .................................................................... 100 v LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: ............................................................................................... 21 List of Large Scale Models with a brief description about each model. Table 2.2: ............................................................................................... 28 List of years, storms, and storm specific dates used in this research. Table 2.3: ............................................................................................... 31 List of large scale models used for producing track forecasts and large scale models used for producing intensity (maximum wind) forecasts. vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: ............................................................................................. 5 Track mean absolute errors, in kilometers, for 1996 to 2006 for the OFCL (solid, dark), GFDI (long dash, medium), and FSSE (short dash, light). The red group is the 12 hour errors; the green group is the 36 hour errors; and the blue group is the 72 hour errors. The FSSE information was only available starting in 2004. Courtesy of the National Hurricane Center. Figure 1.2: ............................................................................................. 6 Maximum wind speed mean absolute errors, in ms-1, for 1996 to 2006 for the OFCL (solid, dark), GFDI (long dash, medium), and FSSE (short dash, light). The red group is the 12 hour errors; the green group is the 36 hour errors; and the blue group is the 72 hour errors. The FSSE information was only available starting in 2004. Courtesy of the National Hurricane Center. Figure 2.1: ............................................................................................. 9 The magnitude of track errors, in kilometers, for the 1999 Atlantic Hurricane season, for the Florida State Superensemble, as compared to the ensemble mean and the respective member models. For each time period on the right the columns correspond to the legend top to bottom. From Williford et al. (2003). Figure 2.2: ............................................................................................. 12 A schematic of a Florida State Superensemble forecast in time, with the regression coefficients calculated in the training phase being applied to the generation of an FSSE forecast in the forecast phase. From Krishnamurti et al (2001). Figure 2.3: ............................................................................................. 15 Model domain coverage of WRFA for Hurricane Ivan on September 12, 2004 at 0000 UTC 00 hr showing sea level pressure. vii Figure 2.4: ............................................................................................. 17 Model domain coverage of MM5 for Hurricane Ivan on September 12, 2004 at 0000 UTC 00 hr showing sea level pressure. Figure 2.5: ............................................................................................. 19 Model domain coverage of HWRF for Hurricane Ivan on September 12, 2004 at 0000 UTC 00 hr showing sea level pressure. Figure 2.6: ............................................................................................. 24 Model domain coverage of GFDL, showing the three nests with the outermost nest (mesh C) having .166 degree resolution and the innermost nest (mesh F) having a .083 degree resolution within a five by five degree domain
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hurricane Ernesto (2006): Frontal Influence on Precipitation Distribution
    Hurricane Ernesto (2006): Frontal Influence on Precipitation Distribution Jordan Dale and Gary Lackmann North Carolina State University Barrett Smith NOAA/National Weather Service Raleigh, North Carolina Motivation Observational Analysis Simulated Frontal Analysis • The distribution of precipitation associated with landfalling tropical 0600 UTC 1 September 0600 UTC 1 September cyclones remains a critical forecast problem and is dependent on several factors, including: . storm motion . intensity . areal extent . synoptic-scale forcing Surface observations RUC Theta and 2-D Frontogenesis 0.5° Reflectivity Theta and 2-D Frontogenesis 850mb Temperature Advection Simulated Total Reflectivity . topographical characteristics • A warm front is noted by a theta gradient strong frontogenesis along the • The locations of frontogenesis and theta gradients with respect to the TC . mesoscale boundaries center are similar to observations but displaced westward. Enhanced coast east of the TC center. A region of enhanced reflectivity is north of • Of these factors, mesoscale boundaries are a prominent forecasting the warm front near the TC center. reflectivities are present to the north of the frontal boundary in locations challenge due to the small spatial scales and complex origins. where 850mb warm advection is occurring. 1800 UTC 1 September • The purpose of this study is to isolate the physical processes at play 1800 UTC 1 September during the interaction of tropical cyclones (TC) and boundaries, and then investigate the predictability and impact
    [Show full text]
  • Portugal – an Atlantic Extreme Weather Lab
    Portugal – an Atlantic extreme weather lab Nuno Moreira ([email protected]) 6th HIGH-LEVEL INDUSTRY-SCIENCE-GOVERNMENT DIALOGUE ON ATLANTIC INTERACTIONS ALL-ATLANTIC SUMMIT ON INNOVATION FOR SUSTAINABLE MARINE DEVELOPMENT AND THE BLUE ECONOMY: FOSTERING ECONOMIC RECOVERY IN A POST-PANDEMIC WORLD 7th October 2020 Portugal in the track of extreme extra-tropical storms Spatial distribution of positions where rapid cyclogenesis reach their minimum central pressure ECMWF ERA 40 (1958-2000) Events per DJFM season: Source: Trigo, I., 2006: Climatology and interannual variability of storm-tracks in the Euro-Atlantic sector: a comparison between ERA-40 and NCEP/NCAR reanalyses. Climate Dynamics volume 26, pages127–143. Portugal in the track of extreme extra-tropical storms Spatial distribution of positions where rapid cyclogenesis reach their minimum central pressure Azores and mainland Portugal On average: 1 rapid cyclogenesis every 1 or 2 wet seasons ECMWF ERA 40 (1958-2000) Events per DJFM season: Source: Trigo, I., 2006: Climatology and interannual variability of storm-tracks in the Euro-Atlantic sector: a comparison between ERA-40 and NCEP/NCAR reanalyses. Climate Dynamics volume 26, pages127–143. … affected by sting jets of extra-tropical storms… Example of a rapid cyclogenesis with a sting jet over mainland 00:00 UTC, 23 Dec 2009 Source: Pinto, P. and Belo-Pereira, M., 2020: Damaging Convective and Non-Convective Winds in Southwestern Iberia during Windstorm Xola. Atmosphere, 11(7), 692. … affected by sting jets of extra-tropical storms… Example of a rapid cyclogenesis with a sting jet over mainland Maximum wind gusts: Official station 140 km/h Private station 00:00 UTC, 23 Dec 2009 203 km/h (in the most affected area) Source: Pinto, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Cyclone Report for Hurricane Ivan
    Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Ivan 2-24 September 2004 Stacy R. Stewart National Hurricane Center 16 December 2004 Updated 27 May 2005 to revise damage estimate Updated 11 August 2011 to revise damage estimate Ivan was a classical, long-lived Cape Verde hurricane that reached Category 5 strength three times on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale (SSHS). It was also the strongest hurricane on record that far south east of the Lesser Antilles. Ivan caused considerable damage and loss of life as it passed through the Caribbean Sea. a. Synoptic History Ivan developed from a large tropical wave that moved off the west coast of Africa on 31 August. Although the wave was accompanied by a surface pressure system and an impressive upper-level outflow pattern, associated convection was limited and not well organized. However, by early on 1 September, convective banding began to develop around the low-level center and Dvorak satellite classifications were initiated later that day. Favorable upper-level outflow and low shear environment was conducive for the formation of vigorous deep convection to develop and persist near the center, and it is estimated that a tropical depression formed around 1800 UTC 2 September. Figure 1 depicts the “best track” of the tropical cyclone’s path. The wind and pressure histories are shown in Figs. 2a and 3a, respectively. Table 1 is a listing of the best track positions and intensities. Despite a relatively low latitude (9.7o N), development continued and it is estimated that the cyclone became Tropical Storm Ivan just 12 h later at 0600 UTC 3 September.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 15 Hurricane Structure
    MET 200 Lecture 15 Hurricanes Last Lecture: Atmospheric Optics Structure and Climatology The amazing variety of optical phenomena observed in the atmosphere can be explained by four physical mechanisms. • What is the structure or anatomy of a hurricane? • How to build a hurricane? - hurricane energy • Hurricane climatology - when and where Hurricane Katrina • Scattering • Reflection • Refraction • Diffraction 1 2 Colorado Flood Damage Hurricanes: Useful Websites http://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/ http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc_home.html http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu http://www.nhc.noaa.gov Hurricane Alberto Hurricanes are much broader than they are tall. 3 4 Hurricane Raymond Hurricane Raymond 5 6 Hurricane Raymond Hurricane Raymond 7 8 Hurricane Raymond: wind shear Typhoon Francisco 9 10 Typhoon Francisco Typhoon Francisco 11 12 Typhoon Francisco Typhoon Francisco 13 14 Typhoon Lekima Typhoon Lekima 15 16 Typhoon Lekima Hurricane Priscilla 17 18 Hurricane Priscilla Hurricanes are Tropical Cyclones Hurricanes are a member of a family of cyclones called Tropical Cyclones. West of the dateline these storms are called Typhoons. In India and Australia they are called simply Cyclones. 19 20 Hurricane Isaac: August 2012 Characteristics of Tropical Cyclones • Low pressure systems that don’t have fronts • Cyclonic winds (counter clockwise in Northern Hemisphere) • Anticyclonic outflow (clockwise in NH) at upper levels • Warm at their center or core • Wind speeds decrease with height • Symmetric structure about clear "eye" • Latent heat from condensation in clouds primary energy source • Form over warm tropical and subtropical oceans NASA VIIRS Day-Night Band 21 22 • Differences between hurricanes and midlatitude storms: Differences between hurricanes and midlatitude storms: – energy source (latent heat vs temperature gradients) - Winter storms have cold and warm fronts (asymmetric).
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane and Tropical Storm
    State of New Jersey 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 5. Risk Assessment 5.8 Hurricane and Tropical Storm 2014 Plan Update Changes The 2014 Plan Update includes tropical storms, hurricanes and storm surge in this hazard profile. In the 2011 HMP, storm surge was included in the flood hazard. The hazard profile has been significantly enhanced to include a detailed hazard description, location, extent, previous occurrences, probability of future occurrence, severity, warning time and secondary impacts. New and updated data and figures from ONJSC are incorporated. New and updated figures from other federal and state agencies are incorporated. Potential change in climate and its impacts on the flood hazard are discussed. The vulnerability assessment now directly follows the hazard profile. An exposure analysis of the population, general building stock, State-owned and leased buildings, critical facilities and infrastructure was conducted using best available SLOSH and storm surge data. Environmental impacts is a new subsection. 5.8.1 Profile Hazard Description A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 2013a). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Critical Role of Cloud–Infrared Radiation Feedback in Tropical Cyclone Development
    The critical role of cloud–infrared radiation feedback in tropical cyclone development James H. Ruppert Jra,b,1, Allison A. Wingc, Xiaodong Tangd, and Erika L. Durane aDepartment of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; bCenter for Advanced Data Assimilation and Predictability Techniques, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; cDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306; dKey Laboratory of Mesoscale Severe Weather, Ministry of Education, and School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China; and eEarth System Science Center, University of Alabama in Huntsville/NASA Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT) Center, Huntsville, AL 35805 Edited by Kerry A. Emanuel, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved September 21, 2020 (received for review June 29, 2020) The tall clouds that comprise tropical storms, hurricanes, and within an incipient storm locally increase the atmospheric trapping typhoons—or more generally, tropical cyclones (TCs)—are highly of infrared radiation, in turn locally warming the lower–middle effective at trapping the infrared radiation welling up from the sur- troposphere relative to the storm’s surroundings (35–39). This face. This cloud–infrared radiation feedback, referred to as the mechanism is a positive feedback to the incipient storm, as it “cloud greenhouse effect,” locally warms the lower–middle tropo- promotes its thermally direct transverse circulation (38, 39) sphere relative to a TC’s surroundings through all stages of its life (Fig. 1A). Herein, we examine the role of this feedback in the cycle. Here, we show that this effect is essential to promoting and context of TC development in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Ex-Hurricane Ophelia 16 October 2017
    Ex-Hurricane Ophelia 16 October 2017 On 16 October 2017 ex-hurricane Ophelia brought very strong winds to western parts of the UK and Ireland. This date fell on the exact 30th anniversary of the Great Storm of 16 October 1987. Ex-hurricane Ophelia (named by the US National Hurricane Center) was the second storm of the 2017-2018 winter season, following Storm Aileen on 12 to 13 September. The strongest winds were around Irish Sea coasts, particularly west Wales, with gusts of 60 to 70 Kt or higher in exposed coastal locations. Impacts The most severe impacts were across the Republic of Ireland, where three people died from falling trees (still mostly in full leaf at this time of year). There was also significant disruption across western parts of the UK, with power cuts affecting thousands of homes and businesses in Wales and Northern Ireland, and damage reported to a stadium roof in Barrow, Cumbria. Flights from Manchester and Edinburgh to the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland were cancelled, and in Wales some roads and railway lines were closed. Ferry services between Wales and Ireland were also disrupted. Storm Ophelia brought heavy rain and very mild temperatures caused by a southerly airflow drawing air from the Iberian Peninsula. Weather data Ex-hurricane Ophelia moved on a northerly track to the west of Spain and then north along the west coast of Ireland, before sweeping north-eastwards across Scotland. The sequence of analysis charts from 12 UTC 15 to 12 UTC 17 October shows Ophelia approaching and tracking across Ireland and Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1
    Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1: Historical Pier Damage in Florida Ralph R. Clark Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems May 2010 Table of Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... ii Chapter 1 – Introduction................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 – Ocean and Gulf Pier Damages in Florida................................................... 4 Chapter 3 – Three Major Hurricanes of the Late 1970’s............................................... 6 September 23, 1975 – Hurricane Eloise ...................................................................... 6 September 3, 1979 – Hurricane David ........................................................................ 6 September 13, 1979 – Hurricane Frederic.................................................................. 7 Chapter 4 – Two Hurricanes and Four Storms of the 1980’s........................................ 8 June 18, 1982 – No Name Storm.................................................................................. 8 November 21-24, 1984 – Thanksgiving Storm............................................................ 8 August 30-September 1, 1985 – Hurricane Elena ...................................................... 9 October 31,
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond, VA Hurricanes
    Hurricanes Influencing the Richmond Area Why should residents of the Middle Atlantic states be concerned about hurricanes during the coming hurricane season, which officially begins on June 1 and ends November 30? After all, the big ones don't seem to affect the region anymore. Consider the following: The last Category 2 hurricane to make landfall along the U.S. East Coast, north of Florida, was Isabel in 2003. The last Category 3 was Fran in 1996, and the last Category 4 was Hugo in 1989. Meanwhile, ten Category 2 or stronger storms have made landfall along the Gulf Coast between 2004 and 2008. Hurricane history suggests that the Mid-Atlantic's seeming immunity will change as soon as 2009. Hurricane Alley shifts. Past active hurricane cycles, typically lasting 25 to 30 years, have brought many destructive storms to the region, particularly to shore areas. Never before have so many people and so much property been at risk. Extensive coastal development and a rising sea make for increased vulnerability. A storm like the Great Atlantic Hurricane of 1944, a powerful Category 3, would savage shorelines from North Carolina to New England. History suggests that such an event is due. Hurricane Hazel in 1954 came ashore in North Carolina as a Category 4 to directly slam the Mid-Atlantic region. It swirled hurricane-force winds along an interior track of 700 miles, through the Northeast and into Canada. More than 100 people died. Hazel-type wind events occur about every 50 years. Areas north of Florida are particularly susceptible to wind damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Sensing-Based Flood Mapping and Flood Hazard Assessment in Haiti
    www.dartmouth.edu/~floods/ csdms.colorado.edu Remote Sensing-based Flood Mapping and Flood Hazard Assessment in Haiti “Rebuilding for Resilience: How Science and Engineering Can Inform Haiti's Reconstruction, March 22 - March 23, 2010, University of Miami - Coral Gables, FL Prof. G. Robert Brakenridge Dartmouth Flood Observatory, Dartmouth College, and Visiting Scientist, Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System, University of Colorado Dr. Scott D. Peckham (Presenter) Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System, University of Colorado 1) Floods commonly produce catastrophic damage in Haiti 2) Not all such floods are from tropical cyclones On May 18-25, 2004, a low-pressure system originating from Central America brought exceptionally heavy showers and thunderstorms to Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Rainfall amounts exceeded 500 mm (19.7 inches) across the border areas of Haiti and the Dominican Republic At the town of Jimani, DR, 250 mm (10 inches) of rain fell in just 24 hours. NASA Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) data. Lethal Major Floods in the Dominican Republic / Haiti are a Near-Annual Event The Dartmouth Flood Observatory data archive dates back to 1985. Between 1986 and early 2004 (prior to Hurricane Jeanne in November), at least, fourteen lethal events impacted the island, including: Year Month Casualties 1986 early June >39 1986 late October 40 1988 early September - Hurricane Gilbert 237 1993 late May 20 1994 early November – Hurricane Gordon >1000 1996 mid November 18 1998 Late August – Hurricane Gustaf >22 1998 late September - Hurricane Georges >400 1999 late October - Hurricane Jose 4 2001 mid-May 15 2002 late May 30 2003 early December - Tropical Storm Odette 8 2003 mid-November 10 2004 late May >2000 NASA’s two MODIS sensors, Aqua and Terra, are an important flood mapping tool: • Visible and near IR spectral bands provide excellent land/water discrimination over wide areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Eyewall Slope As Determined from Airborne Radar Reflectivity Data: Composites and Case Studies
    368 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 28 Hurricane Eyewall Slope as Determined from Airborne Radar Reflectivity Data: Composites and Case Studies ANDREW T. HAZELTON AND ROBERT E. HART Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida (Manuscript received 19 April 2012, in final form 6 December 2012) ABSTRACT Understanding and predicting the evolution of the tropical cyclone (TC) inner core continues to be a major research focus in tropical meteorology. Eyewall slope and its relationship to intensity and intensity change is one example that has been insufficiently studied. Accordingly, in this study, radar reflectivity data are used to quantify and analyze the azimuthal average and variance of eyewall slopes from 124 flight legs among 15 Atlantic TCs from 2004 to 2011. The slopes from each flight leg are averaged into 6-h increments around the best-track times to allow for a comparison of slope and best-track intensity. A statistically significant re- lationship is found between both the azimuthal mean slope and pressure and between slope and wind. In addition, several individual TCs show higher correlation between slope and intensity, and TCs with both relatively high and low correlations are examined in case studies. In addition, a correlation is found between slope and radar-based eye size at 2 km, but size shows little correlation with intensity. There is also a tendency for the eyewall to tilt downshear by an average of approximately 108. In addition, the upper eyewall slopes more sharply than the lower eyewall in about three-quarters of the cases. Analysis of case studies discusses the potential effects on eyewall slope of both inner-core and environmental processes, such as vertical shear, ocean heat content, and eyewall replacement cycles.
    [Show full text]