DOCSLIB.ORG

LOCAL AGENDA 21 – Local Plan for Sustainable Development of Slatina Municipality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LOCAL AGENDA 21 – Local Plan for Sustainable Development of Slatina Municipality 1 SLATINA SLATINA CITY HALL LOCAL AGENDA 21 – Local Plan for Sustainable Development of Slatina Municipality SLATINA 2004 2 MUNICIPALITY UNDP Project ROM 98/012, 0033238 Copyright 2004 Slatina City Hall, Romania 1 Mihail Kogalniceanu St., Olt County Tel: 0249/ 421210 Fax: 0249/ 439336 E-Mail: [email protected] © 2004 National Centre for Sustainable Development 15 Alexandru Philippide, Sector 2, Bucharest Tel: +4021 201 14 02 Fax: +4021 201 14 02 E-Mail: [email protected] The opinions expressed belong to the authors and do not necessarily represent the point of view of the UNDP. Document published with the support of the United Nations Development Programme, the Embassy of the Netherlands in Bucharest – MATRA/KAP Programme and Slatina City Hall Technical expertise provided by the National Centre for Sustainable Development. 3 SLATINA Local Steering Committee Gheorghe Paunescu - President, Mayor of Slatina Municipality Ion Ion, Vice-Mayor, Slatina Municipality City Hall; Meda Vasile, Service Chief, European Integration, Slatina Municipality City Hall; Ilie Alexie, Director, Economic Section, Slatina Municipality City Hall; Ilie Alexandru, President, Chamber of Commerce, Olt Industry and Agriculture; Daniela Lungu, Director, European Integration, Olt County Council; Dorin Rogojinaru, Director, Olt Inspectorate for Environmental Protection; Manuela Putinelu, Chief of Local Office, Olt, Agency for Regional Development, South-western Oltenia; Constantin Dutu, Commissary, Slatina Municipality Police Department; Aurelian Simionescu, Director, Olt Public Health Department; Silviu Neacsu, General Inspector, Olt County School Inspectorate; Geta Boata, Editor, S.C. R.C.S. S.A.; Gheorghe Dobra, Director, S.C. ALRO S.A.; Visi Ghencea, Director, “Oltul” Cultural Centre; Marinela Preoteasa, Director, Olt County Statistics Department; Velemir Radovan, Director, Olt County Department for Labour and Social Solidarity; Maria Puscas, Director, Olt County Agency for Employment; Dumitru Guianu, Vice President, Romanian Business School; Marin Gubandru, General Director, General Department for Public Finances and Financial State Control; Adrian Sichim, Students’ Association; Marin Berneanu, Editor in Chief, “Oltul” Newspaper; Dumitru Paraschiva, Director, Raiffeisen Bank S.A.; Ilie Popa, Director, Romanian Commercial Bank S.A.; Ilie Margarit, Primary Vice President, UGIR Slatina; Relu Ionescu, Architect. Consultancy from the National Centre for Sustainable Development – NCSD: Calin Georgescu – Project Director George Romanca – Project Coordinator for the following cities: Sighisoara, Medias, Sibiu, Bolintin-Vale, Arad, Targoviste Radu Vaduineanu – Project Coordinator for the following cities: Pitesti, Vatra Dornei, Targu Jiu, Falticeni, Campina Tania Mihu – NCSD Consultant, Programme Coordinator – Slatina, Zimnicea Dan Apostol – Editorial, cultural, scientific consultant Carmen Nastase – Financial Coordinator Bianca Bacinschi - Communication Adrian Voinea - IT Specialist 4 MUNICIPALITY Coordination of Working Groups: Social Group Mihai Matei, Secretary of Slatina Municipality; Environment Group: Ilie Ghita, Chief of Public Services Coordination Service, Slatina Municipality City Hall; Education and Culture Group: Mihaela Stana, Slatina Municipality City Hall; Grupul Urbanism şi Amenajarea Teritoriului: Ilie Marinciu, Slatina Municipality City Hall; Economy Group: Ilona Tulache, Slatina Municipality City Hall. 5 SLATINA CUPRINS I.2 OBJECTIVES ......................................................... 51 Foreword by the United Nations Development Programme Resident I.2.1. ENVIRONMENT.................................................. 51 I.2.1.1 Improvement of Air Quality ........................................... 51 Representative in Romania.......................7 I.2.1.2 Preservation, Protection and Efficient Use of Water Supply .............................................................. 51 Foreword by the Mayor of Slatina I.2.1.3 Effective Waste Management....................................... 51 Municipality .................................................9 I.2.2 URBANISM AND LAND MANAGEMENT ............ 51 I.2.3 SOCIAL................................................................ 52 GENERAL PRESENTATION ..............................10 I.2.4. EDUCATION AND CULTURE............................. 54 I. THE LOCAL STRATEGY FOR I.2.5. ECONOMY.......................................................... 54 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.............11 II. LOCAL ACTION PLAN...................................57 I.1 EVALUATION .........................................................11 II.1 MEASURES FOR STRENGTHENING I.1.1 NATURAL RESOURCES ral ................................11 INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY ........................... 57 I.1.1.1 PHYSICAL-GEOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISATION ................................................11 II.2 FINANCIAL PROJECTION.................................... 58 I.1.1.2 CLIMATE .......................................................................11 II.3. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES AND IDENTIFIED I.1.1.3 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY RESOURCES..............11 I.1.1.4 QUALITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS ...................................................... 60 COMPONENTS ...........................................................13 II.3.1. EDUCATION AND CULTURE............................ 60 I.1.2. ANTHROPOGENIC RESOURCES .....................21 II.3.2 ENVIRONMENT.................................................. 64 I.1.2.1. SPATIAL ORGANISATION ..........................................21 II.3.3 Social .................................................................. 66 I.1.2.2 Urban Infrastructure.......................................................23 I.1.2.3 Waste Management ......................................................24 II.3.4 AND LAND MANAGEMENT ............................... 70 I.1.2.4 ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES AND THE BUSINESS II.3.5 ECONOMY.......................................................... 72 ENVIRONMENT ..........................................................25 I.1.3. SOCIAL RESOURCES........................................32 III. PRIORITY PROJECTS...................................75 I.1.3.1. Population Structure and Activity..................................32 I.1.3.2. Labour Force ................................................................33 III.1 Projects in the URBANISM sector ..................... 75 I.1.3.3. Public Health ................................................................34 III.2 Projects in the SOCIAL Sector........................... 77 I.1.3.4. Social Protection and Assistance .................................36 I.1.3.5. Education......................................................................39 III.3 Projects in the ENVIRONMENTAL I.1.3.6. Culture ..........................................................................41 PROTECTION Sector ...................................... 82 I.1.3.7. Sport and Recreation....................................................42 I.1.3.8. Civil Society and Religious Cults..................................42 III.4 Projects in the ECONOMY Sector...................... 84 I.1.3.9. Public Order..................................................................43 6 MUNICIPALITY 7 SLATINA Foreword by the United Nations Development Programme Resident Representative in Romania Local Agenda 21 (LA21) was developed and adopted at the Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 as a vehicle for promoting sustainable development. Ten years later, in Johannesburg in 2002, the second summit promoted LA21 as the principal instrument for use in achieving the well-being of the world’s population. Aimed at local administration, LA21 promotes, through public participation, a delicate balance between economic growth, social equity, and environmental protection. The concept of sustainable development calls for a constant re-evaluation of the relationship between man and nature, and solidarity between generations, as the only viable option for long-term development. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Office in Romania actively promotes sustainable development through its support of the project “Building Local Capacity to Implement the Local Agenda 21 in Romania.” The project was implemented in nine pilot cities during 2000–2002, and in an additional thirteen cities, during 2003–2004. The project covers a new set of cities every year, under the coordination of the National Centre for Sustainable Development, the UNDP implementing agency for LA21. This has been a unique participatory process, stimulating the energy of citizens, businesses, academics, NGOs, and local authorities. They all rose to the challenge and their collective efforts have produced this document. This report grew out of local needs and ideas and is a tribute to their efforts, energy and enthusiasm. Whether by giving information, offering technical assistance or through their participation, the whole community has made an enormous contribution to its success. The result is a coherent strategy with a concrete action and implementation plan. Both offer a concrete certification that the project can meet the needs of the community and represent an important contribution to sustainable development in Romania. I congratulate and thank all those who have contributed to its success. Soknan Han Jung Resident Representative United Nations Development Programme 8 MUNICIPALITY 9 SLATINA Foreword by the Mayor of Slatina Municipality We consider Slatina’s sustainable development as an Development, who made the implementation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romania Page 1 of 13
    Romania Page 1 of 13 Romania International Religious Freedom Report 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The Constitution provides for freedom of religion; while the Government generally respects this right in practice, some restrictions adversely affect religious freedom, and several minority religious groups continued to claim credibly that low-level government officials impeded their efforts at proselytizing and interfered with other religious activities. There was no overall change in the status of respect for religious freedom during the period covered by this report. The Government continues to differentiate between recognized and unrecognized religions, and registration and recognition requirements still posed obstacles to minority religions. The Government did not adopt a new law regulating religions; however, a draft law on religious freedom is under debate by the State Secretariat for Religious Denominations and the recognized religions. Unrecognized religions have not been given any role or say in the debate. The Government has not passed legislation to return to the Greek Catholic community the churches and church property transferred by the communists to the Orthodox Church in 1948, nor has it shown any inclination to do so. An international commission headed by Nobel Prize Laureate Elie Wiesel, set up in 2003 to study the Holocaust in Romania, presented its report, conclusions, and recommendations in November 2004, and state authorities acknowledged publicly the occurrence of the Holocaust in the country. In October 2004, the country commemorated its first annual Holocaust Remembrance Day with the Government organizing public events for the commemoration. The Government also took some steps towards introducing the issue of the Holocaust in the country in school curricula.
    [Show full text]
  • Vincent Verouden
    CURRICULUM VITAE Director Vincent Verouden E.CA Economics Louizalaan / Avenue Louise 222, B-1050 Brussels Phone: +32 2 808 4698 [email protected] Fax: +32 2 808 4744 www.e-ca.com Summary Dr. Vincent Verouden joined E.CA Economics in 2014 as a Director of the Brussels office, after having served as a Deputy Chief Economist at the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Competition (DG Competition). Vincent, a Dutch national, started his professional career at DG Competition in January 2000. In his early years there, he worked for the Merger Task Force (MTF). In addition to reviewing individual merger cases, he was also one of the co-authors of the Commission’s Horizontal Merger Guidelines, published in 2004. Subsequently, Vincent worked for DG Competition’s Chief Economist Team (CET), serving as Deputy Chief Economist between 2012 and 2014. In his time at the CET, Vincent took a lead role in the development of the Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines (2008) and the Commission’s antitrust inquiry into the pharmaceutical sector (2008 - 2009) and related cases. He was also deeply involved in the economic analysis of state aid cases and the development of policy in this field (State Aid Modernisation). His present consulting activities span the fields of antitrust, merger control and state aid control. Recent engagements include work for ArcelorMittal, Airbus Helicopter, Heineken, HeidelbergCement, LG Chem, CVC Capital Partners and Jacobs Holding AG. Vincent is a Solvay Fellow at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel and teaches at the Brussels School of Competition’s LL.M. programme. He is the author of many publications on competition policy, and a co- editor of the reference book “EU State Aid Control: Law and Economics” (Kluwer, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Aprobarea Strategiei De Dezvoltare a Județului Olt Pentru Perioada 2021-2027
    HOTĂRÂRE cu privire la: aprobarea Strategiei de Dezvoltare a Județului Olt pentru perioada 2021-2027 Având în vedere: ➢ Referatul de aprobare nr.2633/16.03.2021 al Președintelui Consiliului Județean Olt; ➢ Raportul nr. 2638/16.03.2021 al serviciului dezvoltare regională; ➢ Avizul nr.5317/25.05.2021 al Comisiei pentru studii economico- sociale, buget-finanţe, integrare europeană, administrarea domeniului public şi privat al judeţului; ➢ Avizul nr. 5295/24.05.2021 al Comisiei pentru organizarea şi dezvoltarea urbanistică, realizarea lucrărilor publice, ecologie şi protecţia mediului, conservarea monumentelor istorice şi de arhitectură; ➢ Avizul nr. 5330/25.05.2021 al Comisiei pentru administraţie publică locală, juridică, apărarea ordinii publice, respectarea drepturilor omului şi relaţii cu cetăţenii; ➢ Avizul nr. 5322/25.05.2021 al Comisiei pentru muncă, protecţie socială, activităţi sportive şi de agrement ; ➢ Avizul nr. 5324/25.05.2021 al Comisiei pentru agricultură, silvicultură,industrie, servicii publice şi comerţ; ➢ Avizul nr. 5341/25.05.2021 al Comisiei pentru cultură, învăţământ, activitatea științifică, sănătate, familie, protecție copii și culte; ➢ Prevederile documentelor de programare la nivel național și regional pentru perioada 2021 - 2027 ; 1 ➢ Prevederile documentelor Uniunii Europene privind politica de coeziune în perioada 2021-2027 ; ➢ Prevederile art. 7 alin. (1) și alin. (2) din Legea nr. 52/2003 privind transparența decizională în administrația publică locală, republicată, În temeiul prevederilor art.173 alin.(1) lit. b), alin.(3) lit. d), art.182 alin.(1) și alin.(4) coroborat cu art.139 alin.(1) și art.196 alin.(1) lit. a) din Ordonanța de urgență a Guvernului nr.57/2019 privind Codul administrativ, cu modificările și completările ulterioare, CONSILIUL JUDEŢEAN OLT adoptă prezenta hotărâre.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    No. 50/14.07.2021 To: Financial Supervisory Authority Bucharest Stock Exchange Current report in compliance with the stipulations of the Law no. 24/2017 and of the FSA Regulation no.5/2018 regarding the issuers of financial instruments and market operations Date of report: 14.07.2021 Name of issuer: Alro S.A. Headquarters: Slatina, 116 Pitesti Street, Olt County Telephone/ fax number: +40 249 431 901 / +40 249 437 500 Sole registration number at the Trade Register Office: RO 1515374 Trade Register Number: J28/8/1991 The European Unique Identifier (EUID): ROONRCJ28/8/1991 Legal Entity Identifier (LEI): 5493008G6W6SORM2JG98 Subscribed and paid-in share capital: 356,889,567.5 RON Regulated market on which the issued shares are traded: Bucharest Stock Exchange – Premium Tier Category (market symbol: ALR ) We hereby inform all persons who may be interested about the following important event to be reported: Press Release EximBank finances with RON 167 million the current activity of ALRO Slatina Bucharest, 14 July 2021 – EximBank granted a financing facility amounting to RON 167 million to ALRO Slatina, the only producer of aluminium and aluminium alloys in Romania and one of the largest vertically integrated aluminium producers in Europe, measured by production capacity. The funds are intended to provide the necessary liquidity for the current activity of the Company and were granted with a state guarantee issued under the state aid scheme COVID-19, dedicated to large companies. “EximBank always proposes concrete and efficient solutions to support the development of Romanian companies and we are glad that, through this financing, we provide to one of the most important companies in Romania and in Europe, the necessary funds for carrying out its current activities in optimal conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • CERBUL LOPĂTAR (DAMA DAMA) ÎN JUDEŢUL OLT: ZOOGEOGRAFIE ŞI DINAMICĂ POPULAŢIONALĂ Sorin GEACU∗
    CERBUL LOPĂTAR (DAMA DAMA) ÎN JUDEŢUL OLT: ZOOGEOGRAFIE ŞI DINAMICĂ POPULAŢIONALĂ Sorin GEACU∗ Key words: Rower buck, zoogeography, effective evolution Introducere Acest mamifer a fost introdus în trei locuri (fig. 1) atât în zona de câmpie cât şi în cea a Piemontului Getic. În ordine cronologică, colonizarea s-a efectuat mai întâi în zona Reşca din Câmpia Romanaţilor, apoi în zona Seaca din Piemontul Cotmenei şi în al treilea rând în zona Bistriţa-Izvoru din Piemontul Olteţului. Specimenele de origine ale populaţiilor actuale de cerb lopătar din Olt provin din judeţele Timiş şi Suceava. Efectivele existente azi nu au legătură între ele. COLONIZAREA ÎN CÂMPIA ROMANAŢILOR Condiţii naturale Primele exemplare de cerb lopătar din Oltenia au fost aduse în pădurea Reşca (numită şi Reşca-Hotărani, după satele apropiate) din centrul judeţului Olt. Ea se află în nord-estul Câmpiei Romanaţilor la altitudini cuprinse între 72 m în sud şi 94 m în nord-vest (95% din suprafaţa pădurii se află la 73-80 m). Partea de vest/nord-vest este traversată, pe o lungime de 3,5 km, de calea ferată Caracal-Piatra Olt (în unii ani, exemplare de cerb lopătar au fost accidentate de tren, ca de exemplu în martie 1977, etc.). Această linie ferată traversează pe 1,5 km şi pădurea Bistriţa-Potopinu. Temperatura medie anuală a aerului este de 9,7° C, iar cantitatea de precipitaţii este de 620 mm/an. Viscolele din lunile februarie 1956, ianuarie 1966, martie 1973, noiembrie 1975, noiembrie 1995, noiembrie 1998 au afectat populaţia de cerb lopătar. De asemeni şi gerul puternic din ianuarie 1963 (atunci la Craiova s-au atins -35,5°C în ziua de 25) ori ploile torenţiale din luna iulie 1970 (pe 8 iulie au căzut la Caracal 118,2 mm).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduceţi Titlul Lucrării
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Annals of the University of Craiova - Agriculture, Montanology, Cadastre Series Analele Universităţii din Craiova, seria Agricultură – Montanologie – Cadastru (Annals of the University of Craiova - Agriculture, Montanology, Cadastre Series) Vol. XLIII 2013 RESEARCH ON THE IDENTIFICATION AND PROMOTION OF AGROTURISTIC POTENTIAL OF TERRITORY BETWEEN JIU AND OLT RIVER CĂLINA AUREL, CĂLINA JENICA, CROITORU CONSTANTIN ALIN University of Craiova, Faculty of Agriculture and Horticulture Keywords: agrotourism, agrotourism potential, agrotouristic services, rural area. ABSTRACT The idea of undertaking this research emerged in 1993, when was taking in study for doctoral thesis region between Jiu and Olt River. Starting this year, for over 20 years, I studied very thoroughly this area and concluded that it has a rich and diverse natural and anthropic tourism potential that is not exploited to its true value. Also scientific researches have shown that the area benefits of an environment with particular beauty and purity, of an ethnographic and folklore thesaurus of great originality and attractiveness represented by: specific architecture, traditional crafts, folk techniques, ancestral habits, religion, holidays, filled with historical and art monuments, archeological sites, museums etc.. All these natural and human tourism resources constitute a very favorable and stimulating factor in the implementation and sustained development of agritourism and rural tourism activities in the great and the unique land between Jiu and Olt River. INTRODUCTION Agritourism and rural tourism as economic and socio-cultural activities are part of protection rules for built and natural environment, namely tourism based on ecological principles, became parts of ecotourism, which as definition and content goes beyond protected areas (Grolleau H., 1988 and Annick Deshons, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • CRISTIAN DIACONESCU Ministrul Afacerilor Externe Aleea Alexandru 31 Sector 1 RO-011822-BUCUREŞTI
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Bruxelles, 25.04.2012 C(2012) 2517 final In the published version of this decision, some information PUBLIC VERSION has been omitted, pursuant to articles 24 and 25 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying WORKING LANGUAGE down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, concerning non-disclosure of information covered This document is made available for by professional secrecy. The omissions are shown thus […]. information purposes only. Subject: State aid No. SA 33624 (ex SA 32491) – Romania Preferential electricity tariffs for ALRO Slatina S.A. Sir/Madam, The Commission wishes to inform Romania that, having examined the information supplied by your authorities on the measures referred to above, it has decided to initiate the formal investigation procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 1. PROCEDURE (1) Based on information from the Romanian press, the Commission started in January 2011 an ex officio inquiry into the directly-negotiated long-term contracts for the supply of electricity between Romanian hydropower producer Hidroelectrica S.A. and aluminium producer ALRO Slatina S.A. (2) The Commission requested information on the measures that are the subject of this Decision by letters of 4 March 2011, 16 February 2011 and 14 April 2011. Romania replied by letters of 24 March 2011, 16 May 2011 and 6 June 2011. The Commission also CRISTIAN DIACONESCU Ministrul Afacerilor Externe Aleea Alexandru 31 Sector 1 RO-011822-BUCUREŞTI Commission européenne, B-1049 Bruxelles/Europese Commissie, B-1049 Brussel – Belgium Telephone: 00- 32 (0) 2 299.11.11.
    [Show full text]
  • Vincent Verouden
    CURRICULUM VITAE Director Vincent Verouden E.CA Economics Louizalaan / Avenue Louise 222, B-1050 Brussels Phone: +32 2 808 4698 [email protected] Fax: +32 2 808 4744 www.e-ca.com Summary Dr. Vincent Verouden joined E.CA Economics in 2014 as a Director of the Brussels office, after having served as a Deputy Chief Economist at the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Competition (DG Competition). Vincent, a Dutch national, started his professional career at DG Competition in January 2000. In his early years there, he worked for the Merger Task Force (MTF). In addition to reviewing individual merger cases, he was also one of the co-authors of the Commission’s Horizontal Merger Guidelines, published in 2004. Subsequently, Vincent worked for DG Competition’s Chief Economist Team (CET), serving as Deputy Chief Economist between 2012 and 2014. In his time at the CET, Vincent took a lead role in the development of the Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines (2008) and the Commission’s antitrust inquiry into the pharmaceutical sector (2008 - 2009) and related cases. He was also deeply involved in the economic analysis of state aid cases and the development of policy in this field (State Aid Modernisation). His present consulting activities span the fields of antitrust, merger control and state aid control. Recent engagements include work for ArcelorMittal, Airbus Helicopter, Heineken, HeidelbergCement, LG Chem, CVC Capital Partners and Jacobs Holding AG. Vincent is an extramural fellow at the Tilburg Law and Economics Centre (TILEC) and a Solvay Fellow at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. He also teaches at the Brussels School of Competition’s LL.M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Artillery and Anti-Aircraft Missiles at the Centenary Celebration
    Review of the Air Force Academy No 1 (31) 2016 THE STATUS OF ARTILLERY AND ANTI-AIRCRAFT MISSILES AT THE CENTENARY CELEBRATION Ion BĂLĂCEANU*, Ovidiu MOŞOIU** *Hyperion University, Bucharest, **,,Henri Coandă” Air Forces Academy, Braşov DOI: 10.19062/1842-9238.2016.14.1.1 Abstract: Most military actions conducted by modern armies have started with air operations; the employment of land and navy forces was nearly impossible without a proper air support, which increases the idea that the vertical dimension of war extends more and more involving the use of the latest discoveries of science and technology and the design of an effective use. In this article the author’s intention is to review some achievements of missiles and artillery air defense weapon system, at a hundred years of existence, as a specialized entity in planning fire fights against aerial enemy, in the area of responsibility of ground forces groups. Keywords: modern war vertical dimension; air defense artillery; air defense missile; air defense weapon system; fighting against aerial enemy. 1. INTRODUCTION The analysis of contemporary military phenomenon highlights a continuous growth of the importance and extension of vertical dimension in military actions [1], the role of air aggression systems and the fight-back air defense assets in modern clashes. This role results from air forces capacity to strike quickly, suddenly and with great destroying power the vital enemy targets with strong and long-lasting effects upon their capacities and consistencies of the responses. Within the current and future joint military actions their larger integrated nature is more and more visible, revealed as a complex, conceptual and pragmatic phenomenon as theory, structures and actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Valorization by Tourism of Gypsy Culture in Romania
    Recent Researches in Social Science, Digital Convergence, Manufacturing and Tourism Valorization by Tourism of Gypsy Culture in Romania TEODORESCU CAMELIA Faculty of Geography, Human Geography Department University of Bucharest 1 Nicolae Balcescu Bvd, 010041 Bucuresti, District 1 ROMANIA [email protected] DINCA IULIAN Department of Geography, Tourism and Territorial Planning University of Oradea 1 Universitatii St., 410087 Oradea ROMANIA [email protected] POPOVICI ADINA Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Economics West University of Timisoara 16 J. H. Pestalozzi St., 300115 Timisoara ROMANIA [email protected] TUDUCE ADELA Bihor Environmental Protection Agency 25/A Dacia Bvd., 410464 Oradea, Bihor County ROMANIA [email protected] Abstract: - This study is an attempt to present the genuine values of Gypsy culture on the Romanian territory, an ethnic group that seems to be quite controversial in terms of its way of life or interests. However, what is known is that each ethnic group has its own culture which deserves to be analyzed and exploited or at least highlighted by tourism. Starting from this idea, this study captures the cultural particularities related to residential architecture, occupations, clothing, food and family traditions of some Gypsy communities located in various geographical areas in Romania. Gypsies’ way of life, regardless of the geographic area they live in, has its specificity and can be easily observed, which this does not coincide with being famous. Their culture is very little known because of poor cooperation and cultural exteriorization. Ethnic tourism could be implemented as an opportunity for these persons for communication, externalization and presentation of authentic cultural values, thus raising their educational and professional level.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE 1. Family Name: SANDA 2. First Names: LUMINITA SILVIA 3
    CURRICULUM VITAE 1. Family name: SANDA 2. First names: LUMINITA SILVIA 3. Date and place of birth: 23 November 1964, Slatina – Olt, Romania 4. Nationality: Romanian 5. Marital status: divorced (1998) 6. Children: 1 daughter - Olga Lacramioara, student – Political and Administrative Sciences 7. Home address: str. Cap. M. Petre, nr. 11, bl. M22, sc. 2, ap. 51, sect. 5, Bucharest, Romania 8. Home tel.: +4021 4205931, mobile phone: +40723302887, e-mail: [email protected] 9. Office address: Ministry of Health and Family, General Directorate of Public Health, str. Cristian Popisteanu, nr. 1-3, sector 1, Bucharest, Romania 10. Office tel.: +4021 3072669, fax: +4021 313 6660, e-mail: [email protected] 11. EDUCATION: - Master – “Management of Health & Social Services”- Bucharest University - Sociology and Social Work Faculty (2000 – 2002) - 2 Specialities: - “Public Health & Management” - Bucharest Medicine and Pharmacy University (2001) - “General Medicine” – Craiova University - General Medicine (1994 – 1997) - 2 Competences - “Management of Health & Social Services” – Health Services Management Institute - Bucharest (1998 – 1999) - “Health Promotion - Health Education” - Health Services Management Institute - Bucharest (1999) - Degree Medical Doctor – Craiova University - General Medicine (1983 – 1989) 9. POSTUNIVERSITY COURSES: - 2002, Warsaw - Tobacco control fellowships - American Cancer Society, OSI New York - 2001, Bucharest – Programs budgeting – US Treasury and Romanian Ministry of Finance - 2001, Bucharest – Projects Management - US
    [Show full text]
  • (CUWS) Outreach Journal # 1217
    USAF Center for Unconventional Weapons Studies (CUWS) Outreach Journal CUWS Outreach Journal 1217 27 May 2016 Feature Item: “US Nuclear Stockpile Numbers Published Enroute To Hiroshima.” Authored by Hans M. Kristensen; posted by the Federation of American Scientists; 26 May 2016. http://fas.org/blogs/security/2016/05/hiroshima-stockpile/ Shortly before President Barack Obama is scheduled to arrive for his historic visit to Hiroshima, the first of two Japanese cities destroyed by U.S. nuclear bombs in 1945, the Pentagon has declassified and published updated numbers for the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile and warhead dismantlements. Those numbers show that the Obama administration has reduced the U.S. stockpile less than any other post-Cold War administration, and that the number of warheads dismantled in 2015 was lowest since President Obama took office. The declassified data shows that the stockpile as of September 2015 included 4,571 warheads. That means the Obama administration so far has reduced the stockpile by 702 warheads (or 13 percent) compared with the last count of the Bush administration. U.S. Nuclear Weapons 1. America's B-2 Stealth Bomber: Ready for War Until 2050 (And Beyond) 2. The Pentagon’s Huge Atomic Floppies U.S. Counter-WMD 1. US Facilities Capable of Intercepting Russian Strategic Missiles — Envoy 2. Pentagon-Linked Analysts Push Preemptive Strike on Russia, Missile Defense 3. China to Send Nuclear-Armed Submarines into Pacific amid Tensions with US U.S. Arms Control 1. US Builds Up Forces Around Russia, Blames Moscow for Holding on to Nukes 2. Russia Responsible Participant in Disarmament Process — Foreign Ministry 3.
    [Show full text]