Risk Assessment of Military Populations to Predict Health Care Cost and Utilization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Risk Assessment of Military Populations to Predict Health Care Cost and Utilization November 2005 Risk Assessment of Military Populations to Predict Health Care Cost and Utilization Final Report Prepared for Thomas Williams, Ph.D. Center for Health Care Management Studies TRICARE Management Activity; HPA&E 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 510 Falls Church, VA 22041 Prepared by Arlene S. Ash, Ph.D., Boston University Nancy McCall, Sc.D., RTI International Participating Investigators Jenn Fonda, M.A., Boston University Amresh Hanchate, Boston University Jeanne Speckman, M.Sc., Boston University RTI International 1615 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 and Boston University School of Medicine 715 Albany Street Boston, MA 02118 RTI Project Number 08490.006 RTI Project Number 08490.006 Risk Assessment of Military Populations to Predict Health Care Cost and Utilization Final Report November 2005 Prepared for Thomas Williams, Ph.D. Center for Health Care Management Studies TRICARE Management Activity; HPA&E 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 510 Falls Church, VA 22041 Prepared by Arlene S. Ash,1 Ph.D., Boston University Nancy McCall, Sc.D., RTI International Participating Investigators Jenn Fonda, M.A., Boston University Amresh Hanchate, Boston University Jeanne Speckman, M.Sc., Boston University RTI International2 1615 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 and Boston University School of Medicine 715 Albany Street Boston, MA 02118 1 Dr. Ash is a developer of the Diagnostic Cost Group (DCG) models and a founder of the company (DxCG, Inc.) that maintains and licenses DCG models, one of the models evaluated in this project. Although the company has been sold, Dr. Ash continues to work one day a week for the company, as a senior scientist. Her primary affiliation, and the one through which she is involved in this project, is as a Research Professor at Boston University School of Medicine. 2 RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Table of Contents Chapter Page Executive Summary...................................................................................................................ES-1 1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................1-1 2 Background...................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 The TRICARE Program......................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Overview of Risk Adjustment Models................................................................................2-3 2.2.1 The Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix System..........................................................2-4 2.2.2 Chronic Disease and Disability Payment System (CDPS).....................................2-5 2.2.3 Clinical Risk Groups (CRG) ..................................................................................2-5 2.2.4 Diagnostic Cost Groups (DCG) .............................................................................2-6 2.3 Selected Groups for Model Comparison.............................................................................2-6 2.4 Model Comparison Criteria.................................................................................................2-7 3 Data...............................................................................................................................................3-1 4 Analysis ........................................................................................................................................4-1 4.1 Study Population.................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Fitting and Validation Samples...........................................................................................4-2 4.3 Calculating Cost..................................................................................................................4-2 4.4 Diagnostic Information .......................................................................................................4-3 4.5 Other New Variables...........................................................................................................4-3 4.5.1 Primary Care Manager: Military or Civilian..........................................................4-3 4.6 Model Implementation........................................................................................................4-4 5 Results...........................................................................................................................................5-1 5.1 Description of the Study Population and Cost Characteristics............................................5-1 5.1.1 Cost Characteristics................................................................................................5-1 5.1.2 Study Population....................................................................................................5-4 5.2 Comparing Models: Individual Measures of Predictive Accuracy .....................................5-5 5.3 Comparing Models: Predictive Ratios for Disease Cohorts..............................................5-15 5.4 Comparing Models: Prior Cost Groups.............................................................................5-17 5.5 Comparing Models: Grouped R-squared (R2)...................................................................5-19 6 Conclusions/Discussion ................................................................................................................6-1 7 References.....................................................................................................................................7-1 Final Report iii Appendixes A Bibliographical Materials.............................................................................................................A-1 B Extended Population Description Tables.....................................................................................B-1 C Data Extraction Materials ............................................................................................................C-1 D Data Processing—Overview and SAS Logs................................................................................D-1 E Selection of Medical Conditions for Grouped Prediction............................................................ E-1 F Extended Results.......................................................................................................................... F-1 iv Final Report List of Figures Number Page 5-1 Actual versus Predicted FY 2002 Costs by 43 “Central” 2-Percentile Groups of FY 2001 Actual (All) Cost ............................................................................................................5-19 List of Tables Number Page ES-1 Overall Measures of Predictive Accuracy ....................................................................................... 2 4-1 Key Analytical Variables................................................................................................................. 4 5-1 Claim-level Costs by Data Source (N = 2.3 million)....................................................................... 2 5-2 Person-level Costs by Data Source (N = 2.3 million)...................................................................... 3 5-3 Person-level Costs by Service Setting (N = 2.3 million)................................................................. 4 5-4 Person-level Costs by Service Sector Utilization (N = 2.3 million)................................................ 4 5-5 Demographic Characteristics and Total Individual Cost of Fitted and Validation Samples in FY 2002 ................................................................................................................................................. 6 5-6 Overall Measures of Predictive Accuracy, by Model*.................................................................... 9 5-7 Predictive Ratio for Demographic and Service-Related Subgroups, by Model ............................ 11 5-8 Predictive Ratios for Disease-Based Cohorts, by Model............................................................... 16 5-9 Predictive Ratios for FY 2001 Cost-based Subgroups, by Model................................................. 18 5-10 Grouped R2 Values for Various Partitions of the Population ........................................................ 20 Final Report v Executive Summary The Military Health System is examining new approaches to financing the care of covered beneficiaries. Since population health care costs depend on illness burden (case-mix), efficient financing should recognize variations in the illness burden of populations seen by different providers. Several mature risk adjustment systems that extract illness burden profiles from computerized encounter records are now used by Medicare, Medicaid, the Veteran’s Health Administration, commercial insurers in the United States, and international stakeholders to understand and manage health care delivery systems. These systems are designed for “population-based” management; “units” are person-years of medical care, and the key outcome is the cost, for each person, of a year of care. The expected cost for a provider for a year is the sum of individual-level person-year estimates for the population served. We conducted side-by-side testing of a simple age-sex method similar to what is currently used in TRICARE Prime and four claims-based risk adjustment models: Adjusted
Recommended publications
  • Ordering Guide Why This Guide Is Important to You and Your Patients
    ORDERING GUIDE WHY THIS GUIDE IS IMPORTANT TO YOU AND YOUR PATIENTS This ordering guide is meant to assist you when ordering a study with Radiology Ltd. The guide includes common indications as well as recommendations for the most appropriate examination. It is our goal to provide you and your patients with the most appropriate and complete imaging examination. After the correct order is placed, examinations are further tailored to each patient’s specific condition. Thus, it is very important for the radiologist to be aware of the clinical question or specific condition in question so that the appropriate imaging can be performed. When ordering an examination please include pertinent history as well as signs or symptoms. Please refrain from ordering “r/o” exams such as “rule out tumor” or “rule out anomaly” unless history and signs/symptoms are included as well. Feel free to specify a particular entity or condition you would like the Radiologist to comment upon in the report. We have also included a list of most commonly used ICD-9 codes. Please note that this is not a complete list so you may need to refer to your most current ICD-9-CM and ICD-10- CM code book for the most appropriate code. The note section at the end of the ICD-9 codes list allows you to add additional codes that are commonly used in your practice. In the back of the guide, you will find a list of our contracted insurance and network plans as well as our imaging centers, addresses and phone numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • ICD-9 Codes for Family Medicine 2011-2012: the FPM Short List
    ICD-9 Codes for Family Medicine 2011-2012: The FPM Short List I. Infectious & Parasitic Diseases 269.9 Nutritional deficiencies, unspec. 340 Multiple sclerosis 574.20 Cholelithiasis, NOS 790.7 Bacteremia (not septicemia) ➤ 278.00 Obesity, NOS 359.9 Myopathy, unspec. 571.5 Cirrhosis, NOS 052.9 Chickenpox, NOS ➤ 278.02 Overweight 349.9 Nervous system, NOS ➤ 564.00 Constipation, unspec. 078.11 Condyloma acuminata 241.0 Thyroid nodule 357.9 Neuropathy, unspec. 555.9 Crohn’s disease, NOS 111.9 Dermatomycosis, unspec. 332.0 Parkinsonism, primary 525.9 Dental, unspec. 057.9 Exanthems, viral, unspec. IV. Blood Diseases 333.94 Restless legs syndrome 522.5 Dental abscess 007.1 Giardiasis 288.9 Abnormal white blood cells, unspec. 327.23 Sleep apnea, obstructive 521.00 Dental caries, unspec. 098.0 Gonorrhea, acute, lower GU tract 285.1 Anemia, acute blood loss 333.1 Tremor, essential/familial 562.11 Diverticulitis of colon, NOS 041.86 Helicobacter pylori 285.29 Anemia, chronic disease, other 781.0 Tremor/spasms, NOS 562.10 Diverticulosis of colon 070.9 Hepatitis, viral, NOS 285.21 Anemia, chronic kidney disease 350.1 Trigeminal neuralgia 536.8 Dyspepsia 053.9 Herpes zoster, NOS 285.22 Anemia, chronic neoplastic disease 530.9 Esophageal disease, unspec. 054.9 Herpetic disease, uncomplicated ➤ 280.9 Anemia, iron deficiency, unspec. VII. Circulatory System 530.10 Esophagitis, unspec. 042 HIV disease ➤ 285.9 Anemia, other, unspec. 411.1 Angina, unstable 564.9 Functional disorder intestine, unspec. V08 HIV positive, asymptomatic 281.0 Anemia, pernicious 413.9 Angina pectoris, NOS 575.9 Gallbladder disease, unspec.
    [Show full text]
  • Vital and Health Statistics; Series 16, No. 7
    Vital and Health Statistics Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics: Numbers 61-70 Series 16: Compilations of Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics No, 7 Data in this ,report from health and demographic surveys present statistics by age and other variables on ambulatory medical care; selected demographic characteristics of teenage wives and mothers; expected principal source of payment for hospital discharges; health practices among adults; and utilization of short-stay hospitals in the treatment of mental disorders, Estimates are based on the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States, These reports were originally published in 1980 and 1981, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUfvfAN SERVICES Public Heaith Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Heaith Statistics Hyattsville, Maryland December 1993 DHHS Publication No. (PHS] 94-1866 .. -- Copyright information All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated. Suggested citation National Center for Health Statistics. Advance data from vital and health statistics: nos 61–70. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 16(7). 1993. National Center for Health Statistics Manning Feinleib, M.D., Dr. P.H., Director Jack R. Anderson, Depup Director Jacob J. Feldman, Ph.D., Associate Director for Aru+sis and Epidemiology Gail F. Fisher, Ph.D., Associate Director for Planning and lWramural Programs Peter L. Hurley, Associate Director for J%al and Health Statistics Systems Robert A. Israel, Associate Director for International Statistics Stephen E. Nieberding, Associate Director for Management Charles J. Rothwell, Associate Director for Data Processing and Services Monroe G.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of an Early Return-To-Work Program
    EFFECTS OF AN EARLY RETURN-TO-WORK PROGRAM ON THE COSTS OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert A. Mosley, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Professor Bruce Growick, Advisor Approved by Professor Michael Klein ____________________ Advisor Professor Bruce Walsh College of Education Copyright by Robert A. Mosley 2003 ABSTRACT One of the major issues confronting employers in the United States today is the high cost associated with workers’ compensation insurance. Although many factors contribute to the total overall cost of workers’ compensation, the major cost driver besides medical is lost time from work. As time off work due to a disabling injury increases, so do injury-related costs such as indemnity payments, medical and legal expenses, and employee costs. This study will investigate the relationship between the implementation of an Early Return to Work program as a component of an Employers’ Disability Management program and its effects on one of the cost drivers affecting their compensation cost (lost time). The purpose of this study is to determine to what extent there is a relationship between early return to work and the length of time off work (TOW) and successful return to work (outcome). This study compares two Early Return to Work (ERTW) programs, one with labor/management support (Toledo), and one without (Cleveland), and it evaluates each program’s effect on time off work (TOW) and rehabilitation outcome. This study will seek to find which of the following characteristics were predictors of desired outcome: Program type (labor/management support and non-labor/management support); Occupational group; and Nature of disability.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE July, 2018
    CURRICULUM VITAE July, 2018 Professor C. B. Bunker MA (Cantab.), MD (Cantab.), FRCP (Lond.) Consultant Physician, Dermatology University College and Chelsea & Westminster Hospitals, London Honorary Professor University College and Imperial College, London Honorary Consultant in Dermatology Royal Hospital Chelsea and St Luke’s Hospital for the Clergy, London ADDRESSES: NHS Private Practice University College Hospital, King Edward VII Hospital 235 Euston Road, London Beaumont Sreet, London W1G 6AA, UK NW1 2BU +44 (0)20 7794 5943 [email protected] [email protected] Academic Home [email protected] 3 Rudall Crescent, London NW3 1RR, UK +44 (0)20 7794 5943 [email protected] FOR AN EXPEDITIOUS RESPONSE, PLEASE SELECT EMAIL ADDRESS JUDICIOUSLY CIVIL STATUS: British. Married. 2 daughters. dob: 22nd November, 1956 PROFESSIONAL General Medical Council 2699954 Revalidated 2016 STATUS: Medical Defence Union 161597J ORCID ID 0000-0002-6693-7483 1 NAME: Christopher Barry BUNKER EDUCATION: Wycliffe College, Stonehouse, Glos. 1970-74 St. Catharine’s College, Cambridge 1975-78 Westminster Medical School, London 1978-81 QUALIFICATIONS: BA (Cantab.) 2(i) Nat. Sci. Tripos (Path. Part II) 1978 LRCP (Lond.), MRCS (Lond.), MB, BS (Lond.) 1981 MRCP (UK) 1985 Specialist accreditation in Dermatology 1991 MD (Cantab.) 1992 FRCP (Lond.) 1996 MAJOR HONOURS, First Scholarship to Wycliffe College 1970 AWARDS & Kitchener Scholarship (Lord Kitchener National Memorial Fund) 1975-81 POSITIONS: Sir Jules Thorn Research Fellowship 1988-90 Sir Walter
    [Show full text]
  • Adam S. Baumgarten, Md, Mba 127 E
    ADAM S. BAUMGARTEN, MD, MBA 127 E. Hawthorne Rd, Birmingham, AL 35209 | 407-760-0608 | [email protected] CURRENT POSITION Assistant Professor 8/2020-Present University of AlaBama at Birmingham, Department of Urology Birmingham, AL TRAINING Fellowship: 7/2019-6/2020 University of Texas Southwestern, Department of Urology Urologic Trauma, Reconstruction, and Prosthetics (Preceptor: Allen F. Morey, MD) Dallas, TX Residency: 7/2015-6/2019 University of South Florida, Department of Urology Tampa, FL Internship: 7/2014-6/2015 University of South Florida, Department of General Surgery Tampa, FL EDUCATION University of Florida 2018 Master of Business Administration, MBA Gainesville, FL University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine 2014 Doctor of Medicine, MD Elected into AOA Tampa, FL University of Florida 2010 Bachelor of Science, BS Major in Finance Minor in Leadership Graduated Cum Laude Gainesville, FL PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE Assistant Instructor 7/2019-6/2020 University of Texas Southwestern, Department of Urology Dallas, TX ADAM S. BAUMGARTEN, MD, MBA PAGE 2 LICENSURE AlaBama: MD.40480 Texas: R9917 EDITORIAL EXPERIENCE BJU International Manuscript Reviewer Journal of Sexual Medicine Manuscript Reviewer BMC Urology Manuscript Reviewer JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS 1. Baumgarten AS, VanDyke ME, Yi YA, Keith CG, Fuchs JS, Ortiz NM, Cordon BH, Pagliara TJ, Ward EE, Jaderlund JW, Teeple CS, Christine BS, Yafi FA, Hudak SJ, Morey AF. “Favorable Multi- Institutional Experience with Penoscrotal Decompression for Prolonged Ischemic Priapism”. BJU International, 2020. (PMID: 32501654) 2. Ortiz NM, Wolfe AR, Baumgarten AS, Ward EE, VanDyke ME, Hudak SJ, Morey AF. “Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion “Heat Map” Shows Similar Anatomic Characteristics for Transcorporal and Standard Approach”.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008/024456 a 2
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (43) International Publication Date national Publication Number 28 February 2008 (28.02.2008) 2008/024456 A 2 (51) International Patent Classification: 43220 (US). MILLER, Duane, D. [US/US]; 8706 Maple A61K 31/675 (2006.01) A61K 31/4704 (2006.01) Creek Cove, Germantown, TN 38139-6437 (US). A61K 31/555 (2006.01) A61K 31/32 (2006.01) A61K 31/4709 (2006.01) A61K 31/277 (2006.01) (74) Agent: COHEN, Mark, S.; Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer, A61K 31/405 (2006.01) A61K 31/165 (2006.01) LLP 1500 Broadway, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10036 (US). (21) International Application Number: PCT/US2007/01 8686 ( 1) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, , . .. ... , ..0„„8. ) A AU, AZ, B B B BH, BR, BW, BY, B C C τ n 0_7n n fV7 (22) International Fibng Date: 24 August 20 (24 2007 T, A, B, G, D M D O Z, A, H, , .,. τ ,. , ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, (25) Fibng Language: English E Q M N p R L A L L LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, (26) Pubbcation Language: English M χ M γ M Z N A N Q N Q N Z Q M p Q p H p L PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, SV, SY, (30) Priority Data: T J M N R χ z U A U Q u s u z c N Z A 60/839,665 24 August 2006 (24.08.2006) US ZM ZW PCT/US2006/033490 28 August 2006 (28.08.2006) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 11/5 10,844 28 August 2006 (28.08.2006) US kind of regional protection avai iable): ARIPO (BW, GH, 60/907,749 16 April 2007 (16.04.2007) US G M E S M W M Z NA> S Ό S S Z τ z υ G Z M ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM), (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): UNIVER- European (AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, SITY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION R G B G R HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV,MC, MT, NL, PL, [US/US]; 1534 White Avenue, Suite 403, Knoxville, TN P T R O , SE, SI, SK, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, 37996 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Surgery in the HIV Patient SAMUEL SMIT, MB Chb, M Med (Surg) Correspondence To: Samuel Smit ([email protected])
    Surgery guidelines Guidelines for surgery in the HIV patient SAMUEL SMIT, MB ChB, M Med (Surg) Correspondence to: Samuel Smit ([email protected]) References 1. Harris HW, Schecter WP. Surgical risk assessment and management in patients with HIV disease. Gastroenterol Clin 1997;26(2):377-391. 2. Jones S, Schecter CB, Smith C, et al. Is HIV infection a risk factor for complications of surgery? Mt Sinai J Med 2002; 69(5): 329-333. 3. Reilly MJ, Burke KM, Davison SP. Wound infection rates in elective plastic surgery for HIV positive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123(1):106-111. 4. Consten EC, van Lanchot JJ, Henry PC, et al. A prospective study on the risk of exposure to HIV during surgery in Zambia. AIDS1995;9(6):585-588. 5. Quebberman EJ, Telford GL, Wadsworth K, et al. Double gloving: protecting surgeons from blood contamination in the operating room. Arch Surg 1992;127(2): 213-221. AUGUST 2010 Vol.28 No.8 CME A Gastrointestinal disease 13. Smit S, Botha R, Barry R, Hartslief M, Du Toit. HIV and the general surgeon. Gastrointestinal 193:1-5. 14. Metha SH, Lucas GM, Mirel LB, et al. Limited effectiveness of antiviral therapy diseases in HIV/AIDS treatment for hepatitis C in urban HIV clinic. AIDS 2006;20:2361-2369. 15. Thio CL, Seaberg EC, Skolansky R Jr, et al. HIV-1 hepatitis B virus and the C G TROSKIE, risk of liver-related mortality in the multicentre cohort study (MACS). Lancet 2002;360:1921-1926. Correspondence to: [email protected] 16.
    [Show full text]
  • INDICATIONS for the USE of TRADITIONAL MEDICINES Based on the IPPC-2 Devised by WONCA
    Cridland JS, Koonin S. Use of traditional medicines--towards a classification.S Afr Med J. 2001 Jun;91(6):489-91. Suppl files INDICATIONS FOR THE USE OF TRADITIONAL MEDICINES based on the IPPC-2 devised by WONCA. An "indication" consists of 2 parts: the "condition" that leads to the consultation, & the "action" that what is to be done about it. The following List A shows the conditions and the terminating List B shows the actions. The normal rules for the use of ICPC-2 apply with modifications as described in the notes below. The organ systems (mnemonics in brackets) are: A = "general"(All); B = "blood"; D = "digestive"; F = "eye"(Focus); H = "ear"(Hearing); K = "circulatory" (Kardiac); L = "muscoloskeletal"(Limbs); N = "neurological"; P = "psychological"; R = "respiratory"; S = "skin" (Surface); T = "endocrine & metabolic" (Thyroid); U = "urology"; W = "pregnancy & family planning (Womb); X = "female genital system" (X-chromosome); Y = "male genital system" (Y-chromosome); Z = "magicosocial" (ZoZiety; this has been modified from ICPC-2). NOTES: 1) The following assignments in List A are made to satisfy what the "indications" appear to mean in the corresponding source document. 2) Organ system A ("general") ONLY holds conditions that a) affect more than one organ system, &/or b) are not described as being localised in one organ system. 3) Organ system Z ("magicosocial") holds conditions that are magicosociological disorders; apparently physical disorders, regardless of their cause, fall under sections A-Y. This is for convenience' sake & implies nothing for or against the traditional healing system being classified. 4) The general rule followed by ICPC-2 is that symptoms, symptom clusters, fears & other conditions observed & suffered but not firmly diagnosed fall into the number range 01-29 whereas diseases that are diagnosed (EVEN IF they are not specified) are numbered from 70-99.
    [Show full text]
  • (10) Patent No.: US 8080682 B2
    US008080682B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,080,682 B2 Dalton et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 20, 2011 (54) SUBSTITUTEDACYLANILIDES AND E. 9:2: 3. 3. METHODS OF USE THEREOF GB 1360001 3, 1970 JP 52-128329 1Of 1977 (75) Inventors: James T. Dalton, Lakeland, TN (US); JP 54-63047 12, 1980 Duane D. Miller, Germantown, TN (US) WO WO95/1977O 7, 1995 WO WO9805962 2, 1998 (73) Assignee: University of Tennessee Research W W g 3. 3. 2. Foundation, Knoxville, TN (US) WO WOO127622 4/2001 - WO WOO128990 4/2001 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this WO WOO1 34.563 5, 2001 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WOO2 OO617 1, 2002 U.S.C. 154(b) by 647 days. WO WO O2, 16310 2, 2002 WO WOO3 O11302 2, 2003 WO WO 03/049675 6, 2003 (21) Appl. No.: 11/892,595 WO WOO3,065992 8, 2003 WO WOO3,O74471 9, 2003 (22) Filed: Aug. 24, 2007 WO WO 2004/064747 8, 2004 WO WO 2005/0372O1 4/2005 (65) Prior Publication Data WO WO 2005/120483 12/2005 WO WO 2007/027582 3, 2007 US 2008/OO76829 A1 Mar. 27, 2008 OTHER PUBLICATIONS Related U.S. Application Data Byrnet al. Solid-State Chemistry of Drugs, 2d, Chapter 11 Hydrates (60) Provisional application No. 60/839,665, filed on Aug. and Solvates, 233-247.* 24, 2006, provisional application No. 60/907,749, Morissette et al. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2004, 56, 275-300.* filed on Apr. 16, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Peyronie's Disease and Low Intensity
    Original Article - Sexual Dysfunction/Infertility Korean J Urol Posted online 2015.11.3 Posted online 2015.11.3 pISSN 2005-6737 • eISSN 2005-6745 Peyronie’s disease and low intensity shock wave therapy: Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rate in an open-label single arm prospective study in Australian men Eric Chung1,2 1University of Queensland, Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, 2AndroUrology Centre, St Andrew’s War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes following low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LiESWT) in men with Peyronie’s disease (PD) using a standardised protocol. Materials and Methods: In this open-label single arm prospective study, patients with PD were enrolled following informed con- sent. Patient demographics, change in penile curvature and plaque hardness, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 score, and overall satisfaction score (on a 5-point scale) were recorded. Treatment template consists of 3000 shock waves to the Peyronie’s plaque over 20 minutes, twice weekly for 6 weeks. Results: The majority of patients have PD history longer than 6 months (mean, 12.8 months; range, 6–28 months). Two thirds of patients have received and failed oral medical therapy. There were improvements in penile curvature (more than 15 degrees in 33% of men), plaque hardness (60% of men) and penile pain (4 out of 6 men) following LiESWT. There was a moderate improve- ment in IIEF-5 score (>5 points reported in 20% of men). No complication was reported and the majority of patients were satisfied (rated 4 out of 5; 70% of men) and would recommend this therapy to others.
    [Show full text]
  • Dermatology Syllabus Guidance August 2021
    Dermatology Syllabus Guidance August 2021 Preface This document is produced by the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) Education Subcommittee, in conjunction with the Joint Royal College of Physicians Training Board (JRCPTB) Dermatology Specialist Advisory Committee (SAC). Led by the BAD Academic Vice President and the Chair of the Dermatology SAC, the Syllabus Guidance is to be used as a supporting document for the GMC 2021 Dermatology Curriculum. It provides detailed competencies to support the high-level Capabilities in Practice (CiPs) outlined in the curriculum. The competencies listed in the Syllabus Guidance are not exhaustive, nor should they be used as a “tick box” exercise to automatically presume the learner’s ability to practice independently. Instead, the Syllabus Guidance is an accepted agreed standard which should be used to guide both dermatology trainers and trainees. It catalogues the knowledge, skills and behaviours within the scope of practice of a consultant dermatologist working independently in secondary care. Suggested teaching and learning methods are also indicated. Achievement of various competences encompassing the breadth and depth of the Syllabus Guidance can be used as evidence to support attainment of the six generic and seven dermatology-specific CiPs in the 2021 Dermatology Curriculum. Dermatology Syllabus Guidance August 2021 Page 2 of 54 Contents 2021 Dermatology Curriculum Capabilities in Practice .................................... 5 Developing Professionalism ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]