Riga City - on the Way to Sustainable Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE (ECE) Workshop on Encouraging Local Initiatives Towards Sustainable Consumption Patterns (2-4 February 1998, Vienna, Austria) RIGA CITY - ON THE WAY TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Case-study prepared by Ms. Inara Marana,.Ms. Kristine Abolina, Mr. Andis Zilans, Ms. Sniedzite Sprukta, Ms. Marita Nikmane City of Riga, Latvia UNITED NATIONS Geneva, 1997 This document has been reproduced without formal editing. ECE/ENHS/NONE/1997/39 GE.97- KEY FACTS ABOUT RIGA AND LATVIA Riga, the capital of the Republic of Latvia, situated on the Baltic Sea south of the Riga Gulf. In 2001 Riga will celebrate its 800th anniversary. The independent Republic of Latvia was established first in 1918, but in 1940 it fell under the Soviet power. In 1991 Latvia regained its independence. Riga is the biggest City in the Baltic States with 815.8 thousand inhabitants. At the beginning of 1997 one third of the population of Latvia lived in Riga and this was almost half of the Latvia’s urban population. The total population of Latvia is 2.5 mln., 1.03 mln. of them living in the Riga Region. Population density – is in Riga 2,658 inhabitants per sq.km , in Latvia 36,.8. The City’s territory covers 307 sq. km. As much as 54.2% of the City’s territory is open space, 36.6% green space, 41.5%. built up areas. INTRODUCTION Riga’s municipal government plays a key role in the economic development process of the City heading towards the creation of the best possible living and working conditions for people, at the same time protecting environment and national heritage, and providing equal opportunity for individual development. Our present society is becoming increasingly a consumer society using more and more resources, so that the balance between nature and human activity is spoiled. Therefore, Riga also has to put emphasis on careful utilization of resources, protective attitude to nature and changing residents’ behavioural model of attitudes to resource consumption. The Riga Case Study evaluates the Riga City local initiatives to change people’s behaviour and attitudes to consumption based on best examples in Riga’s planning, nature protection, housing, waste management, transport, water and energy sectors, at the same time showing obstacles and problems in these areas and outlining possible ways by which the objectives of sustainable development at the local level could be achieved. The evaluation of local initiatives as the task of the Riga Case Study is not an easy one in the times of economic and social transition when suffering from lack of data, analytical studies and research on subject. Moreover, the situation of public behaviour and attitudes to consumption is not studied at all. The time we are living in, planning, developing and arranging various urban structures is to be taken into consideration when evaluating local initiatives. Therefore, evaluation of local initiatives out of the context cannot give a sufficiently accurate view of what is going on in Riga. Public behaviour model of changing attitudes to consumption is in process, and Riga is facing the need to make the necessary choices. 1. CURRENT SITUATION AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS At present Riga is undergoing a process of metamorphosis. Every conceivable aspect of City life - the economy, the Government’s system, the society - is in the process of rapid and indeterminate change. DEMOGRAPHIC SITUATION. The population of Riga has decreased by up to 97 thousand since 1990 reaching 815.8 thousand in 1997. Migration has been the main cause of the decrease, but it is also related to the mortality rate which is much higher than that of birth throughout the period in concern. According to the demographic forecast, the population of Riga will continue decreasing, and most probably it will be around 790.000 in 2003. At the beginning of 1997 Riga had 17.1% population under the labor age, 63.1% of labor age and over 27.7% of retirement age. Demographers are predicting that the retired population could increase by the turn of the century. Riga's population's ethnic composition also has changed considerably from 70% of Latvians in 1940 to 38.6% in 1997 (the average number of Latvians in Latvia in 1997 is 52.6%). ECONOMIC SITUATION. The economic forces forming the economic basis of Riga and ensuring its development during the last 50 years have disappeared, as new forces are arising instead. Riga’s economy is in transition. The economy of Riga accounts for 52% of GDP of Latvia. The main three sectors of the national economy, also in Riga, are services, transport and industry. Both the service and transportation sectors are still growing and will still be the economic backbone of Latvia and Riga in the future. Manufacture is decreasing, but its rate of decline is slowing down. It will not have a dominant role in the future, but it is changing its features significantly. Within the last years Riga has become the largest financial center in the Baltic Region. The small business and service sectors are developing in Riga, private capital prevailing and increasing its share rapidly, and giving residents additional employment, which explains the quite moderate level of unemployment, at least what is registered officially. The official statistics shows that 3,6 % of the economically active residents were unemployed in Riga in 1996 matching half the unemployment rate of Latvia (7.2%). However, the real unemployment, which includes the hidden unemployment, is much higher in Riga. Economically active people live mostly in Riga. The number of active residents employed was 491.2 thousand in the middle of 1997. Land reform is going on for several years in Riga as one of the most difficult processes in the reorganization of land ownership towards market economy. Various enterprises are being privatized. Conflicts of interests arise in the course of privatization and creation of land market, economical considerations often prevailing environmental protection. Reconstruction of old buildings for diverse institutional and commercial needs is also promoting economical activities in the City, though this activity is low for the time being. Particular attention was paid last year to modernization and reconstruction of urban infrastructure, playing a key role in the economical development. It should be noted that educational aspirations of Latvian people are increasing. SOCIAL SITUATION. The social problems have become more pronounced. Social structures are changing currently, as residents are stratified by income levels. The sudden inflation after regaining independence shocked the public. The increasing wages still do not keep up with the inflation, thus decreasing the buying power of population leading to the feeling of insecurity among citizens. As much as 27.7% of the Riga’s population are pensioners whose pensions are indexed at a rate less than the inflation rate, making even moderate inflation a most painful experience. This is naturally leading to the fact that environmental concerns come after existential problems of the public: sustainance, communal payments and rent. URBAN DEVELOPMENT TRENDS. Residents of Riga had up to now good opportunities for employment, education, cultural and social requirements. Therefore, the residents of the former Soviet Union often choose the capital of Latvia for their residence. Riga was also chosen as an industrial growth center by the central planning powers in Moscow. The population of Riga has grown disproportionately for these reasons, compared to other Latvian cities. One third of Latvia’s population lived in Riga at the beginning of 1997, and this was almost half of all Latvian urban population. The recent commercial activities in Riga are promoting occupation of new areas within the City and in the suburbs. New development is currently being extended beyond the City's boarders. Intense use of Riga surroundings for housing construction, business and mixed industry takes place developing those areas along highways and railroad lines. 2. NEW PLANNING PRACTICE AND INITIATIVES PRESENT SITUATION. After restoration of Latvia's independence different legislation initiatives on environment and development planning have taken place in Latvia. The Territorial Planning Regulations were adopted in 1994 designed to be a management tool for governance after independence of Latvia. Legislative system keeps on changing: new Territorial Planning Regulations, Development Law, and Guidelines for Preparing Development Strategy are currently under preparation. The National Environmental Protection Policy Plan containing policy goals and principles, description and analyses of priority environmental problems, as well as survey of political instruments and recommendations for their application was accepted by the Cabinet of Ministers of Latvia in 1995. In 1997 the National Environmental Action Program was accepted. The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development in cooperation with the Sweden Agency of Environmental Protection is working at the Project on “Harmonization of Environmental Legislation in Latvia”. During the last few years various plans have been worked out in Riga accordingly adopted laws. The Riga Development Strategy was prepared at the end of 1995; the Riga City Council adopted the Official Plan of Riga. The Riga Region Development Strategy was initiated by the Riga City Development Department at the end of 1996. Different initiatives have also been promoted in different sectors of the Riga City. All these initiatives are very important for targeted development, environmental protection, nature conservation, national heritage management, and dealing with common problems by different stakeholders in the City. Each plan being developed by law in Latvia must undergo the State Ecological Expertise to evaluate the policy and adopted solutions pursued by the plan in accordance to the requirements of environmental protection. RIGA CITY OFFICIAL PLAN - POLICY FOR THE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY. In the opinion of many experts the most important achievement of planning in the last years was the adoption of the Riga Official Plan.
Recommended publications
  • Riga Municipality Annual Report 2003 Riga Municipality Annual Report 2003 Contents

    Riga Municipality Annual Report 2003 Riga Municipality Annual Report 2003 Contents

    Riga Municipality Annual Report 2003 Riga Municipality Annual Report 2003 Contents The Report of Riga City Council Chairman 4 The Report of Riga City Council Finance Department Director 5 Structure and Function of the Riga City Council 6 Riga City: Review and Development 7 History and Geographical Location 7 Inhabitants 8 Description of the Economy of the City 10 Education and Sport 11 Social Assistance and Services 12 Housing and Municipal Services, Environmental Protection 13 Culture 14 Transport and Communications 15 Health Care 16 Order and Security 16 Implementation of the City Development Plan and Community Consultation 17 Initiatives Promoting the Awareness of the Community and their Involvement in Public Debate 18 Participation in International Collaborative Projects 19 Initiatives to Improve Management of Municipal Organizations and Enterprises 20 The Economic Development of the City of Riga 22 Branch Industry Structure 22 City of Riga Financial and Budget Policy 25 Investment Profile 27 Property Profile 29 Riga Municipality Financial Report 32 Auditors Report 32 Condensed Annual Accounts 34 Cash Flow Statement 35 Income Statement (Basic Budget) 35 Income Statement (Special Purpose Budget) 36 Investment 37 Lending to Associated Enterprises 38 Receivables 38 Cash 38 Liabilities 39 Derivatives 39 Income Statement (Basic Budget) 39 Income Statement (Special Purpose Budget) 41 Income Statement on Donations and Endowments 42 Terms for the Composition of Annual Accounts 43 Budget Performance, year 2003 45 Riga Municipality Budget, year 2004 55 IISBN 97489-45-10 © Riga Municipality, 2004 This Annual Report contains photographs of Riga City Council initiatives. © Leons Balodis, Andris Krievi¿‰, IlmÇrs Znoti¿‰, Raitis Puri¿‰, Kristaps Kalns 2 Riga Municipality Annual Report 2003 The inhabitants of Riga are the City’s most important economic, social and cultural development potential.
  • A Case Study of Riga Municipality Sigita Struberga and Aleksandra Kjakste*

    A Case Study of Riga Municipality Sigita Struberga and Aleksandra Kjakste*

    SJPA National Minorities’ Inclusion and Representation in 22(1) Local Government Policy-Making in Latvia: A Case Study of Riga Municipality Sigita Struberga and Aleksandra Kjakste* Abstract Sigita Struberga The aim of this article is to assess the extent of cooperation between municipalities and University of Latvia Latvia’s Russian-speaking minority towards the goal of securing its inclusion in the local [email protected] governance of the nation. The research is split into two main parts. First, an analytical Aleksandra Kjakste framework is established using governance theories, with a particular focus on the criteria University of Latvia of fairness and competences. Second, an empirical framework analyses various determi- [email protected] nants on the basis of a case study of the Riga city municipality. The authors conclude that there is notable progress in the creation of formal frameworks fostering inclusiveness, in particular in public administration and legislation. However, several disadvantages are still observed when the attempts at inclusion encounter the two aforementioned criteria. As a result, the overall forms and initiatives towards cooperation fail to engender an environment that would foster new competencies or values for the general public or par- ticular stakeholders. Introduction Keywords: Public participation in administration is highly valued in contemporary demo- Russian-speaking minority Local government cratic societies (Cooper, Bryer & Meek, 2006; Yang & Pandey, 2011; Quick, Inclusion Bryson, Slotterback & Crosby 2013; Quick & Bryson, 2016), giving rise to Policy-making questions of how to best achieve a holistic representation of the various layers of Latvia society. For several decades, one of the greatest challenges in this context has stemmed from the increasing ethnic and linguistic diversity in European socie- ties (Eelbode, 2010; Bell, 2010).
  • The Chronicle Henry of Livonia

    The Chronicle Henry of Livonia

    THE CHRONICLE of HENRY OF LIVONIA HENRICUS LETTUS TRANSLATED WITH A NEW INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY James A. Brundage � COLUMBIA UNIVERSI'IY PRESS NEW YORK Columbia University Press RECORDS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION is a series published under the aus­ Publishers Since 1893 pices of the InterdepartmentalCommittee on Medieval and Renaissance New York Chichester,West Sussex Studies of the Columbia University Graduate School. The Western Records are, in fact, a new incarnation of a venerable series, the Co­ Copyright© University ofWisconsin Press, 1961 lumbia Records of Civilization, which, for more than half a century, New introduction,notes, and bibliography© 2003 Columbia University Press published sources and studies concerning great literary and historical All rights reserved landmarks. Many of the volumes of that series retain value, especially for their translations into English of primary sources, and the Medieval and Renaissance Studies Committee is pleased to cooperate with Co­ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-PublicationData lumbia University Press in reissuing a selection of those works in pa­ Henricus, de Lettis, ca. II 87-ca. 12 59. perback editions, especially suited for classroom use, and in limited [Origines Livoniae sacrae et civilis. English] clothbound editions. The chronicle of Henry of Livonia / Henricus Lettus ; translatedwith a new introduction and notes by James A. Brundage. Committee for the Records of Western Civilization p. cm. - (Records of Western civilization) Originally published: Madison : University of Wisconsin Press, 1961. Caroline Walker Bynum With new introd. Joan M. Ferrante Includes bibliographical references and index. CarmelaVircillo Franklin Robert Hanning ISBN 978-0-231-12888-9 (cloth: alk. paper)---ISBN 978-0-231-12889-6 (pbk.: alk.
  • Latvia by Juris Dreifelds

    Latvia by Juris Dreifelds

    Latvia by Juris Dreifelds Capital: Riga Population: 2.1 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$19,090 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2013. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Electoral Process 1.75 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 Civil Society 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 Independent Media 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 Governance* 2.25 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic Governance n/a 2.25 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.25 2.25 2.25 Local Democratic Governance n/a 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Judicial Framework and Independence 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 Corruption 3.50 3.50 3.25 3.00 3.00 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.25 3.00 Democracy Score 2.17 2.14 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.18 2.18 2.14 2.11 2.07 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects.
  • Gulf of Riga (Latvia)

    Gulf of Riga (Latvia)

    EUROSION Case Study GULF OF RIGA (LATVIA) Contact: Ramunas POVILANSKAS 31 EUCC Baltic Office Tel: +37 (0)6 312739 or +37 (0)6 398834 e-mail: [email protected] 1 EUROSION Case Study 1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA The length of the Latvian coastline along the Baltic proper and the Gulf of Riga is 496 km. Circa 123 km of the coastline is affected by erosion. The case area ‘Gulf of Riga’ focuses on coastal development within the Riga metropolitan area, which includes the coastal zone of two urban municipalities (pilsetas) – Riga and Jurmala (Figure 1). Riga is the capital city of Latvia. It is located along the lower stream and the mouth of the Daugava river. Its several districts (Bulli, Daugavgriva, Bolderaja, Vecdaugava, Mangali and Vecaki) lie in the deltas of Daugava and Lielupe rivers and on the Gulf of Riga coast. Jurmala municipality is adjacent to Riga from the west. It stretches ca. 30 km along the Gulf of Riga. It is the largest Latvian and Eastern Baltic seaside resort. 1.1 Physical process level 1.1.1 Classification According to the coastal typology adopted for the EUROSION project, the case study area can be described as: 3b. Wave-dominated sediment. Plains. Microtidal river delta. Within this major coastal type several coastal formations and habitats occur, including the river delta and sandy beaches with bare and vegetated sand dunes. Fig. 1: Location of the case study area. 1.1.2 Geology Recent geological history of the case area since the end of the latest Ice Age (ca.
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed

    ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed

    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
  • Rīgas Ūdens» Galvenie Objekti

    Rīgas Ūdens» Galvenie Objekti

    03.04.2019 Variations in industrial wastewater composition at inflow of Riga wastewater treatment plant «Daugavgriva», Latvia Numbers and Facts Information about SIA «Rīgas ūdens» 2018 • Riga city service territory 307 km2 • Riga citizens 677 295 connected to town water&sewage network 619 703 PE - 701 534 • Clients – 15 000 • Drinking water supply 39,147 million/m3 • Treated wastewater 47,540 million /m3 • Financial turnover 45,6 million /EUR • Employees 772 EU co-financed projects Project «Development of Water Management in Riga, 5th stage» 2018 – 2019 Planned activities of the Project Project funding in Berģi, Imanta and Beberbeķi: 26, 07 million/EUR Including Cohesion • New Sewerage network 34,59 km; fund cofunding • Sewer network reconstruction 0,44 km, 9, 93 million/EUR • 18 new Sewerage Pumping Stations. In addition to 2014-2020 period planned activities of 24,73 km new centralized water supply networks will be built and 0,41 km reconstructed (financed as project non-related expenses). Planned project period is 69 months with the deadline on 31th December in 2023 Investments Main investments in drinking water and sewer networks Investment type 2016 2017 2018 Water network rehabilitation ~ 0,9 km ~ 8,2 km ~ 3,6 km Gravity sewer rehabilitation ~ 3,4 km ~ 10,7 km ~ 9,9 km Pressure sewer rehabilitation 0 km ~ 1 km ~ 8,9 km Fire hydrants replaced 510 483 472 Valves replaced (DN≥100 mm) 1447 1133 1010 Water supply network Water Supply Riga city Remberģi Centralized water supply system Baltezers-1 scheme in 2019 Baltezers Baltezers-2 Zaķumuiža RĪGA 1 416 km water supply network 15 water pumping stations Daugava 01.12.2017.
  • Riga City Council Election Report

    Riga City Council Election Report

    RESULTS OF THE EXTRAORDINARY ELECTIONS TO THE RIGA CITY COUNCIL August 29, was the official date of the extraordinary elections to the Riga City On February 13, 2020, the Parliament Council, where the elligable inhabitants of Riga could choose one of the 15 adopted the Law on Dissolution of the submitted lists of candidates to give their vote to. Based on the results from Riga City Council, which entered into all 156 polling stations, the joined list of Development/For! and the force on February 25 after Progressives had a clear win, gathering 26.16% of the votes in that way promulgation by the President of breaking the long lasting pro-russian party Harmony being in power in the Latvia Egils Levits. The election, Riga City Council. originally scheduled for April 25, was first put off until June 6, but due to the state of emergency declared in Latvia and the security measures eligible residents voted in the Riga City Council extraordinary introduced to prevent the spread of 40.58% elections, and this was the historically lowest turnout in the Covid-19 the election took place on municipal elections in Riga since 1997 August 29. LEADER OF THE All together, seven out of 15 lists of candidates reached the 5% threshold gaining the seat in the Council. From all the WINNING LIST elected members of the Council, only 21 members of the 26.16% previous term were elected, but 39 will be newly elected members.. s e v i s 16.89% s n e 15.24% a r i v g t o a r L P s n e n o & i h o a ! i n s T r / g g e 9.64% ī U o e e v R i F c n / t R 7.72% t n e a f a i v a n 6.52% 6.39% v o s r i r l e s l e n e y u S A s y t o m i i l R n n o t p n a t o o n a o i n r l U C a c i o o e m i v o r v t w n w t s e a e e a o s a MĀRTIŅŠ STAĶIS H N N N A D H L (DEVELOPMENT/FOR! AND THE PROGRESSIVES) Member of Parliament and a former Parliamentary Secretary of the Ministry of Defence.
  • Urban Transformation of Riga's Microrayons

    Urban Transformation of Riga's Microrayons

    URBAN TRANSFORMATION OF RIGA‘S MICRORAYONS FROM A SUSTAINABLE URBAN DESIGN PERSPECTIVE CASE STUDY: MEŽCIEMS JOMANTE VALIULYTE INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE 2013 ISU URBANISM Master Thesis, 30ects, Spring Semester 2013 Spatial Planning with an emphasis on Urban Design in China and Europe Blekinge Institute of Technology (BTH) Karlskrona, Sweden Institute for Sustainable Urbanism (ISU), TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany Tutors: Prof.Jana Revedin (BTH); Prof.Dr. Vanessa Miriam Carlow (ISU) Pictures, maps and drawings are made by the author, the ones which are used from other sources are explained in APPENDIX 2 of this thesis. Copyright©Jomante Valiulyte ([email protected]) CAD drawings were provided by ISU. ABSTRACT Today, almost every town in Europe has a district of mass housing estates. Espe- plemented, would transform Riga into an attractive and sustainable city. These cially European countries, which were in the former Soviet Union, are facing ample strategies also have the potentials to transform other areas plagued by the prob- issues on dealing with mass housing districts, which cover a great part of cities. lems associated with mass housing estates. Most of them are in a critical condition and in necessary need of renovation. Never- theless, they are strongly criticized by researchers, as uncomfortable places to live, Key Words: mass housing estates, sustainable revitalisation, microrayon, urban which do not fit the human scale. These post – Soviet mass housing estates, which transformation, sustainable urban design. are called ‘microrayons’, is an immense headache to all post - Soviet countries. Riga, which is the capital of Latvia and the biggest city in the Baltic States, can be considered as a special case because of its historical and political situation.
  • Ministry of Transport Republic of Latvia Mobility Plan and Action Program for Riga and Pieriga SEA Report

    Ministry of Transport Republic of Latvia Mobility Plan and Action Program for Riga and Pieriga SEA Report

    Ministry of Transport Republic of Latvia Mobility Plan and Action Program for Riga and Pieriga SEA Report Mobility Plan Riga and Pieriga Tornu iela 4, III C, office no. 203 Riga, LV-1050 Latvia Phone: +371 7 223 144 Fax: +371 7 223 830 INDEX P. ABBREVIATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Framework 1 1.2. Project background 1 1.3. Objectives of the RPMP 2 1.4. Strategic Environmental Assessment 3 1.5. SEA Scoping 5 1.6. Consultation meetings 5 1.7. Relation SEA and RPMP 6 1.8. Contents of the report 6 2. LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 7 2.1. SEA Directive 7 2.2. Other EU regulations 8 2.3. Other international conventions 11 2.4. Latvian regulations 11 2.4.1. SEA regulations 11 2.4.2. Other relevant Latvian regulations 14 2.4.3. Latvian transport development policy documents 16 3. THE CURRENT STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT IN RIGA AND PIERIGA 17 3.1. Introduction 17 3.2. About Riga and Pieriga 17 3.3. Climate, air, water, soil and the landscape 18 3.3.1. Climate 18 3.3.2. Air 19 3.3.3. Noise 25 3.3.4. Water 30 3.3.5. Landscape and soil 30 3.4. Flora and fauna 31 3.4.1. Biological diversity 31 3.4.2. Special protected areas 31 3.5. Cultural heritage 32 4. ANALYSIS OF CURRENT MOBILITY IN RIGA AND PIERIGA 33 4.1. The study area 33 4.2. Socio-economic characteristics 35 4.3. The policy framework 37 4.4.
  • Latvia Reloaded – the Parties Are Trying to Revive the Spirit of 1991

    Latvia Reloaded – the Parties Are Trying to Revive the Spirit of 1991

    1|2011 KAS INTERNATIONAL REPORTS 71 Latvia reLoaded – the parties are trying to revive the spirit of 1991 Andreas M. Klein In many ways, the elections of 2nd October 2010 were a call for Latvia’s 1.5 million citizens to decide the future direction of their country. On the one hand the ruling coalition made up of “Unity” (Vienotība), “Union of Greens and Farmers” (Zaļo un Zemnieku Savienība / ZZS) and “For Fatherland and Freedom” (Tēvzemei un Brīvībai / TB/LNNK), headed by Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis, sought agreement for its austerity policies caused by the crisis, on the other Andreas M. Klein is hand the electorate had to vote on whether the business Resident Represen- tative of the Konrad- interests of the Latvian “oligarchs” should continue to have Adenauer-Stiftung in a significant influence on the country’s politics. On top of Latvia. this, since the local elections of June 2009, there had been a shift in power towards the “Harmony Centre” (Saskaņas Centrs / SC), the party representing the ethnic Russian minority, which after the election became the strongest faction on the influential Riga City Council and which maintained steady support in the polls of between 25 to 30 per cent in the lead-up to the election. In the end the civic electoral alliance Vienotība, which was formed in March out of “New Era” (Jaunais laiks / JL), “Civic Union” (Pilsoniskā savienība / PS) and “Society for Other Politics” (SCP), won a surprise clear majority over the other parties with 31.22 per cent of the vote. And as the two previous coalition also increased their share of the vote, the ruling coalition came out of the tenth elections to the Saeima, the Latvian Parliament, stronger than ever.
  • Flood Risk Management Plan for Riga City

    Flood Risk Management Plan for Riga City

    About plan Flood Risk Management Plan for Riga City Different territories of Riga City flood for various reasons (spring spate, intense precipitation, wind surges, malfunctioning melioration and rainwater drainage systems) or for combinations of reasons, posing a threat to residential areas, manufacturing or public buildings and other forms of infrastructure. In addition, flood may cause environment pollution from manufacturing companies and present risks to monuments of architecture and culture, and it potentially endangers specially protected nature territories and sites. The most serious flood risks that endanger Riga City are connected with wind surges in Riga Bay (as opposed to spring spate, downpours or melting snow); therefore, the most significant flood prevention measures are linked with protection against flooding caused by wind surges. Observations so far indicate that simultaneous occurrence of spring spate and wind surges is impossible, and since the risk of spring spate is lower, then, whilst primarily protecting territories from sea water surges, they will also be protected from flooding caused by spring spate. According to the climate change forecasts, the frequency and extent of flooding in future will grow, thus increasing the risk of flooding even more. To ensure sustainable development of the city it is necessary to reduce the flood risk endangering inhabitants and property by balancing environment, social and economic interests. The reduction of risk will considerably lessen the damage that flood could cause the owners and governments at all levels. The aim of flood risk management is to manage the flood risk in a way that the balance is obtained among the environmental, social and economic needs that are and will be influenced by flood risk prevention measures.