DOCSLIB.ORG

Foundation Document Overview, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Glen Canyon National Recreation Area Rainbow Bridge National Monument Arizona and Utah Contact Information For more information about the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Rainbow Bridge National Monument Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or 928-608-6205 or write to: Superintendent, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Rainbow Bridge National Monument P.O. Box 1507, Page, AZ 86040-1507 Purpose Significance Significance statements express why Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Rainbow Bridge National Monument resources and values are important enough to merit national park unit designation. Statements of significance describe why an area is important within a global, national, regional, and systemwide context. These statements are linked to the purpose of the park unit, and are supported by data, research, and consensus. Significance statements describe the distinctive nature of the park and inform management decisions, focusing efforts on preserving and protecting the most important resources and values of the park unit. • The Colorado River and its many tributaries, including the Dirty Devil, Paria, Escalante, and San Juan rivers, carve GLEN CANYON NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, through the Colorado Plateau to form a landscape of located at the center of the Colorado dynamic and complex desert and water environments. Plateau, provides for public enjoyment • The vast, rugged landscapes of Glen Canyon National through diverse land- and water- Recreation Area provide an unparalleled spectrum of based recreational opportunities, and diverse land- and water-based recreational opportunities protects scenic, scientific, natural, and for visitors of wide-ranging interests and abilities. cultural resources on Lake Powell, the Colorado River, its tributaries, and • Glen Canyon National Recreation Area preserves a record surrounding lands. of more than 10,000 years of human presence, adaptation, and exploration. This place remains significant for many descendant communities, providing opportunities for people to connect with cultural values and associations that are both ancient and contemporary. RAINBOW BRIDGE NATIONAL MONUMENT • The deep, 15-mile-long, narrow gorge below the dam protects an extraordinary natural bridge provides a glimpse of the high canyon walls, ancient that captures public and scientific interest rock art, and a vestige of the riparian and beach terrace with its rainbow form and appearance. environments that were seen by John Wesley Powell’s Colorado River expedition in 1869, providing a stark contrast to the impounded canyons of Lake Powell. • Rainbow Bridge is one of the world’s largest natural bridges and is a premier example of eccentric stream erosion in a remote area of the Colorado Plateau. • For many indigenous peoples in the Four Corners region, Rainbow Bridge is a spiritually occupied landscape that is inseparable from their cultural identities and traditional beliefs. Fundamental Resources and Values Fundamental resources and values are those features, systems, processes, experiences, stories, scenes, sounds, smells, or other attributes determined to merit primary consideration during planning and management processes because they are essential to achieving the purpose of the park and maintaining its significance. Below are the fundamental resources and values of Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Rainbow Bridge National Monument. • Heritage Resources: Glen Canyon National Recreation Area is the steward of heritage resources exemplified by the archeological and historic sites, cultural landscapes, and traditional cultural properties that illustrate the connection of people with the landscape of the Glen Canyon region. • • • Paleontology: Glen Canyon National Recreation Area preserves one of the most complete sections of Mesozoic • strata in the world; new discoveries continuously add to • our scientific understanding of the past. • • Water: Water quality and quantity is essential for public outdoor recreational use and enjoyment and for sustaining • terrestrial and aquatic life in the high desert. • • Rainbow Bridge: The bridge itself is a fundamental resource. • • Traditional Cultural Property and Values: Rainbow • Bridge and the immediately surrounding landscape are • considered sacred by, and are vitally linked with the histories, cultural practices, ceremonial activities, and oral • traditions of associated American Indian tribes. Photo by Gary Ladd • Lake Powell: Lake Powell, set dramatically against a backdrop of eroded red rock canyons and mesas, is the largest man-made lake in North America and is widely recognized by boating enthusiasts as one of the premier water-based recreation destinations in the world. • Landscape: The vast landscape of Glen Canyon contains rugged water- and wind-carved canyons, buttes, mesas, rivers, seeps, springs, and hanging gardens where diverse habitats sustain an array of endemic, rare, and relict plant and animal communities. Location of Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Rainbow Bridge National Monument To 70 To 70 To 70 N O Y N 72 A C F IE Fremont H T E S 24 R O H CANYONLANDS 24 S O R U U Hanksville P CANYONLANDS S T H Airport NATIONAL PARK NATIONAL PARK FISHLAKE Loa HORSESHOE D U.S. Forest Service Lyman E NORTH CANYON UNIT E SODA H S E PINTO HILLS T U NATIONAL FOREST R N SPRINGS A T O E S T Hanksville Y Buttes of BASIN Green F A Bureau of Land Management N F L F 24 A I the Cross River P r C L S e A m C J N U N o E N O W A A n CAPITOL REEF r NYO 763 e A O v C Y N P t Ri T A H S N A Y Bicknell t S n O 777 A N W o O E B m R S C E A NATIONAL PARK e L Fr R S U Y R E O E D E E B R G Caineville L B H PIUTE G R L C O A S r WAYNE V R S A L Cleopatras i A N T e v A V L L I I e P A Chair L e r L L L I Y R W I L 95 M W O T R n Grand B LL Torrey H E IG HO D O A O Y D 775 T View L Ekker N E B i O R Visitor Center E r Y Butte Point N Teasdale E N t A 774 C Hans Flat C y U.S. Forest Service R U S R H L N E B A i B E v M S i Panorama E c e Fruita O Natural Arch C F e N Point A r n N YON t CAN Y e R OX SIN O B n L 744 A PETES E D RA B N ISLAND k R P n e O TWIN CORRAL FLATS MESA e C P i Notom a 765 e v IN IN U r l Maze (site) i W X CA M O N C H l T B Y NORTH TRAIL B I O N A N CANYON E THE SKY i S O E g E BURR T R h I S r M U THE MAZE R w S M e S DESERT M E L O W t SA F a T a D U F A N y I 763 L E T w L A A t E R SAMS MESA 633 C IN e Dirty R GORDON FLATS r k T e Devil i E e e w v Singletree e E v r S G Bagpipe i WAYNE Lookout Peak C e R N R WAYNE r Butte ON 11124ft A GARFIELD t NY Bagpipe 3391m n P GARFIELD CA R 787 a Butte O s O THE a Lonesome PY The Pinnacle il Larb e P ra M l Bull Mountain BERT M A T ERNIES P C Beaver ESA H t NEEDLES Hollow E n O (BLM) 7187ft POISON SPRING G li K ID F COUNTRY U 2800m C R Mount Ellen A S N N IG E B N Pleasant Lower Y 756 C T 11522ft o E O E R A T N H d B Creek Bowns 3512m T O I a A N r S U S R NORTH HATCH 731 Teapot o McMillan CANY l C G Big A ON E Oak Rock o A T Springs Buckacre N E Lake A C Creek Y H L (BLM) Point O T P F C 633 730 N O S OINT H I U R P C SOUTH HATCH CANYON A N T R Steep L ED C O A A Y U Creek D N H N Q A Fiddler Turkey C N O A H Butte CLEARWATER O FI WATERHOLE FLAT Y y Homestead Knob R Y DD E L N a E T N ER CANYON w T A C y OV A B U C E C THE BLOCK RED BENCHES C nic Cedar N B ce Ragged IR S R 95 A All Glen Canyon NRA lands G DIXIE NATIONAL FOREST 2 Mesa Mountain T Y BEEF BASIN 1 S P y Y The north of this line require SU a N backcountry permits which are M w Horn O E 276 THREE Y Blue h issued by Canyonlands NP. C S A Hog FORKS N A g C S A Special regulations apply. Spruce i N E T Springs C A Cyclone R T Y H N M A Rest O L Lake C S C N H o A e L H U A ll Area A s t U Y N o T I R DARK CANYON N T B N E R A m A T A T T a Mount Pennell r N N A PRIMITIVE AREA R M C c a E A o M O O C - 11371ft TAYLOR RIDGES c k T Y V (Bureau of Land U h P r E Posy b B t O N C A 3466mO y h Management) M o E u t IN A Lake n e C 633 T l U T O e R l A oa f d B L l r Bulldog U i P I BOX-DEATH R o Anasazi a N G MAIDENWATER r W o T Peak N g a SANDS K d State Park T R a Boulder T HOLLOW C N r I s A T r A D C TS h O LA H R Dirty ILLER F O G ANDY M u r I E WILDERNESS Cass wa R Y B o n e N E e te I M d r Devil N ai e B (Forest Service) a Creek Cr S N A O d k C Peak DRY X S S NA K RROW C N Mount Hillers CANYON NYO Deer A NO MAN MESA CA E M L N P I 10723ft TRA TO O E MESA SHEEP - K Creek S u Starr 632 N R Y R 3268m CANYON EA O l L H 139 A N D e S Springs Hite MILLE CRAG U BLACK POINT D A y T W a S YOUNGS C C (BLM) Wo n BEND l A INDIAN v K DAR d E e G H SPRINGS S r Sundance 12 C O C C R i BENCHES A C U n N r Trailhead NYON DARK CANYON L O e r e B H e G B e 630 i Farley LOWER HORSE WILDERNESS r e O k c E BLACK STEER C h k X FLATS (Forest Service) H Canyon Indian Escalante L T M W h ON Wolverine Petrified s 657 G C L Head E a k r State Park o S 133 e Wood Natural Area Ant Pass A e Mount e Calf o W White 656 W C A k Knoll e p Holmes A r Wide Hollow Creek s THE Canyon H MANTI-LA SAL N T u C I Reservoir R t S ON T Y M E NY HORN Copper A E o E a I A E O scal r C IN ante a g K E Point N NYON e IL N NATIONAL R CA l n C M YO R d T i WO AN C iv T a O T C A er U S r R P N P U H C Y B COAL BED MESA a R TC O YON CO NO W N Escalante E CAN S E FOREST M O m ILE U O L URM BL O BLM, NPS, USFS a T FO D t o T E i I N C N LEY o L S L C h g H A I d V R S n Mount 651 O K i O Castle E C y BIG THOMPSON r 123 L H Ellsworth G C p Butte 95 E E L S Y C a R
Recommended publications
  • PRELUDE to SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING and SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION of SEVEN BROAD CANYONS in the NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B

    PRELUDE to SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING and SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION of SEVEN BROAD CANYONS in the NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B

    PRELUDE TO SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING AND SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF SEVEN BROAD CANYONS IN THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B. Loope1, Ronald J. Goble1, and Joel P. L. Johnson2 ABSTRACT Within a four square kilometer portion of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, seven distinct slot canyons cut the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone. Four of the slots developed along separate reaches of a trunk stream (Dry Fork of Coyote Gulch), and three (including canyons locally known as “Peekaboo” and “Spooky”) are at the distal ends of south-flowing tributary drainages. All these slot canyons are examples of epigenetic gorges—bedrock channel reaches shifted laterally from previous reach locations. The previous channels became filled with alluvium, allowing active channels to shift laterally in places and to subsequently re-incise through bedrock elsewhere. New evidence, based on optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages, indicates that this thick alluvium started to fill broad, pre-existing, bedrock canyons before 55,000 years ago, and that filling continued until at least 48,000 years ago. Streams start to fill their channels when sediment supply increases relative to stream power. The following conditions favored alluviation in the study area: (1) a cooler, wetter climate increased the rate of mass wasting along the Straight Cliffs (the headwaters of Dry Fork) and the rate of weathering of the broad outcrops of Navajo and Entrada Sandstone; (2) windier conditions increased the amount of eolian sand transport, perhaps destabilizing dunes and moving their stored sediment into stream channels; and (3) southward migration of the jet stream dimin- ished the frequency and severity of convective storms.
  • The Little Colorado River Project: Is New Hydropower Development the Key to a Renewable Energy Future, Or the Vestige of a Failed Past?

    The Little Colorado River Project: Is New Hydropower Development the Key to a Renewable Energy Future, Or the Vestige of a Failed Past?

    COLORADO NATURAL RESOURCES, ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW The Little Colorado River Project: Is New Hydropower Development the Key to a Renewable Energy Future, or the Vestige oF a Failed Past? Liam Patton* Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 42 I. THE EVOLUTION OF HYDROPOWER ON THE COLORADO PLATEAU ..... 45 A. Hydropower and the Development of Pumped Storage .......... 45 B. History of Dam ConstruCtion on the Plateau ........................... 48 C. Shipping ResourCes Off the Plateau: Phoenix as an Example 50 D. Modern PoliCies for Dam and Hydropower ConstruCtion ...... 52 E. The Result of Renewed Federal Support for Dams ................. 53 II. HYDROPOWER AS AN ALLY IN THE SHIFT TO CLEAN POWER ............ 54 A. Coal Generation and the Harms of the “Big Buildup” ............ 54 B. DeCommissioning Coal and the Shift to Renewable Energy ... 55 C. The LCR ProjeCt and “Clean” Pumped Hydropower .............. 56 * J.D. Candidate, 2021, University oF Colorado Law School. This Note is adapted From a final paper written for the Advanced Natural Resources Law Seminar. Thank you to the Colorado Natural Resources, Energy & Environmental Law Review staFF For all their advice and assistance in preparing this Note For publication. An additional thanks to ProFessor KrakoFF For her teachings on the economic, environmental, and Indigenous histories of the Colorado Plateau and For her invaluable guidance throughout the writing process. I am grateFul to share my Note with the community and owe it all to my professors and classmates at Colorado Law. COLORADO NATURAL RESOURCES, ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW 42 Colo. Nat. Resources, Energy & Envtl. L. Rev. [Vol. 32:1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF PLATEAU HYDROPOWER ...............
  • Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National

    Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National

    CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scoping Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Scoping Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Publication of the Notice of Intent ....................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Other Outreach Methods ....................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Opportunities for Public Comment ................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Public Scoping Meetings .................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Cooperating Agency Involvement ................................................................................................... 4 2.6 National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal Consultation ....................................................... 5 3 Submission Processing and Comment Coding .................................................................................... 5
  • Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin

    Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin

    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 40 Number 4 Article 2 12-31-1980 Terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin N. Duane Atwood U.S. Forest Service, Provo, Utah Clyde L. Pritchett Brigham Young University Richard D. Porter U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Provo, Utah Benjamin W. Wood Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Atwood, N. Duane; Pritchett, Clyde L.; Porter, Richard D.; and Wood, Benjamin W. (1980) "Terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 40 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol40/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF THE KAIPAROWITS BASIN N. Diiane Atwood', Clyde L. Pritchctt', Richard D. Porter', and Benjamin W. Wood' .\bstr^ct.- This report inehides data collected during an investigation by Brighani Young University personnel to 1976, as well as a literature from 1971 review. The fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin is represented by 7 species of salamander, toads, mnphihians (1 5 and 1 tree frog), 29 species of reptiles (1 turtle, 16 lizards, and 12 snakes), 183 species of birds (plus 2 hypothetical), and 74 species of mammals. Geographic distribution of the various species within the basin are discussed. Birds are categorized according to their population and seasonal status.
  • Trip Planner

    Trip Planner

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Grand Canyon National Park Grand Canyon, Arizona Trip Planner Table of Contents WELCOME TO GRAND CANYON ................... 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ............................... 3 GETTING TO GRAND CANYON ...................... 4 WEATHER ........................................................ 5 SOUTH RIM ..................................................... 6 SOUTH RIM SERVICES AND FACILITIES ......... 7 NORTH RIM ..................................................... 8 NORTH RIM SERVICES AND FACILITIES ......... 9 TOURS AND TRIPS .......................................... 10 HIKING MAP ................................................... 12 DAY HIKING .................................................... 13 HIKING TIPS .................................................... 14 BACKPACKING ................................................ 15 GET INVOLVED ................................................ 17 OUTSIDE THE NATIONAL PARK ..................... 18 PARK PARTNERS ............................................. 19 Navigating Trip Planner This document uses links to ease navigation. A box around a word or website indicates a link. Welcome to Grand Canyon Welcome to Grand Canyon National Park! For many, a visit to Grand Canyon is a once in a lifetime opportunity and we hope you find the following pages useful for trip planning. Whether your first visit or your tenth, this planner can help you design the trip of your dreams. As we welcome over 6 million visitors a year to Grand Canyon, your
  • West Colorado River Plan

    West Colorado River Plan

    Section 9 - West Colorado River Basin Water Planning and Development 9.1 Introduction 9-1 9.2 Background 9-1 9.3 Water Resources Problems 9-7 9.4 Water Resources Demands and Needs 9-7 9.5 Water Development and Management Alternatives 9-13 9.6 Projected Water Depletions 9-18 9.7 Policy Issues and Recommendations 9-19 Figures 9-1 Price-San Rafael Salinity Control Project Map 9-6 9-2 Wilderness Lands 9-11 9-3 Potential Reservoir Sites 9-16 9-4 Gunnison Butte Mutual Irrigation Project 9-20 9-5 Bryce Valley 9-22 Tables 9-1 Board of Water Resources Development Projects 9-3 9-2 Salinity Control Project Approved Costs 9-7 9-3 Wilderness Lands 9-8 9-4 Current and Projected Culinary Water Use 9-12 9-5 Current and Projected Secondary Water Use 9-12 9-6 Current and Projected Agricultural Water Use 9-13 9-7 Summary of Current and Projected Water Demands 9-14 9-8 Historical Reservoir Site Investigations 9-17 Section 9 West Colorado River Basin - Utah State Water Plan Water Planning and Development 9.1 Introduction The coordination and cooperation of all This section describes the major existing water development projects and proposed water planning water-related government agencies, and development activities in the West Colorado local organizations and individual River Basin. The existing water supplies are vital to water users will be required as the the existence of the local communities while also basin tries to meet its future water providing aesthetic and environmental values.
  • Alterna`Ve Views of Colorado Plateau and Rio Grande Rift

    Alterna`Ve Views of Colorado Plateau and Rio Grande Rift

    Parks from Space:Parks from Space: Alternave Views of Colorado Plateau and Rio Grande Ri Parklands Using Remote Sensing Imagery and Astronaut Photographs Joseph F. Reese, Geosciences Department, Edinboro University of PA • In this presenta,on, I will show several parklands of the Colorado Plateau and Rio Grande Ri: from a dis,nctly alterna,ve perspec,ve ‐‐ Space. Remote sensing imagery and astronaut photographs give a unique view of some of our con,nent's most recognizable landscapes. Rocky Mountains Tectonic Map of North America, (from the Space Shule) Central Rocky Mountains PHOTOGRAPHS and IMAGES OBTAINED FROM: EARTH SCIENCES AND IMAGE ANALYSIS LAB: “The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth” hp://eol.jsc.nasa.gov (several capons are from this source) Space Shule and Internaonal Space Staon photographs taken by astronauts EARTH OBSERVATORY / VISIBLE EARTH: hp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov (some capons are from this source) hp://visibleearth.nasa.gov (some capons are from this source) satellite imagery from Landsat 7, MODIS, MISR, SeaWIFS Jet Propulsion Lab – ASTER: hp://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ FIELD and AERIAL PHOTOS and FIGURES from: Yann Arthus‐Bertrand, Russ Finley, Lou Maher, John Shelton, Chernicoff (text), Plummer and McGeary (text), Tarbuck and Lutgens (text), United States Geological Survey, and various other texts and websites! Physiographic Map of the Lower 48 States, USA Colorado Plateau Colorado Plateau Locaon map of Naonal Parks in Western U.S. This natural‐color image combines data from over 500 Mul‐angle Imaging Spectro‐Radiometer (MISR) orbits with shaded relief Digital Terrain ElevaGon models from the ShuDle Radar Topography Western Mission (SRTM) and other North America sources.
  • Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology of the Nankoweap Rapids Area, Marble Canyon, Arizona

    Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology of the Nankoweap Rapids Area, Marble Canyon, Arizona

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP 1-2608 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY QUATERNARY GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE NANKOWEAP RAPIDS AREA, MARBLE CANYON, ARIZONA By Richard Hereford, Kelly J. Burke, and Kathryn S. Thompson INTRODUCTION sion elsewhere in Grand Canyon {Hereford and oth­ ers, 1993; Fairley and others, 1994, p. 147-150). The Nankoweap Rapids area along the Colorado River {fig. 1) is near River Mile 52 {that is 52 mi or 83 km downstream of Lees Ferry, Arizona) in Grand Canyon National Park {west bank) and the Navajo METHODS Indian Reservation {east bank). Geologic mapping and [See map sheet for Description of Map Units] related field investigations of the late Quaternary geo­ morphology of the Colorado River and tributary A variety of methods were used to date the de­ streams were undertaken to provide information about posits. Radiocarbon dates were obtained from char­ the age, distribution, and origin of surficial deposits. coal and wood recovered from several of the mapped These deposits, particularly sandy alluvium and closely units (table 1). Several of these dates are not defini­ related debris-flow sediment, are the substrate for tive as they are affected by extensive animal bur­ riparian vegetation, which in turn supports the eco­ rowing in the alluvial deposits that redistributed burnt system of the Colorado River (Carothers and Brown, roots of mesquite trees, giving anomalous dates. The 1991, p. 111-167). late Pleistocene breccia (units be and bf) and re­ Closure of Glen Canyon Dam {109 km or 68 lated terraces were dated by Machette and Rosholt mi upstream of the study area) in 1963 and subse­ (1989; 1991) using the uranium-trend method.
  • Control of Erosion on Construction Sites

    Control of Erosion on Construction Sites

    624 RAN:c COf'<-\ I A LIBRARY PLANNING AND EP CONTROL OF EROSION ON CONSTRUCTION SITES By Michael J. Ransom CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 7 1 CONTROL OF EROSION ON CONSTRUCTION SITES 9 1.1 General 9 1 .2 How Does Erosion Occur? 9 2. BENEFITS OF EROSION CONTROL ON CONSTRUCTION SITES 11 3. PRINCIPLES OF EROSION CONTROL ON CONSTRUCTION SITES 12 3.1 Planning Phase Controls 12 3.2 Design and Construction Phase Controls 13 3.3 Maintenance Phase Controls 14 4. CONSTRUCTION SITE PRACTICE 15 4.1 Initial Clearing and Site Preparation 15 4.2 Access Around the Site 16 4.3 Drainage 19 4.4 Stockpiles and Spoil Dumps 30 4.5 Vegetation and Reclamation 31 4.6 Batters 34 4.7 SedimentTrapping 37 APPENDIX 1. Construction Supervisor's Check List 46 APPENDIX 2. Conservation, Forestsand Lands 47 Regional Offices REFERENCES 48 f l � t. tf.· . ' f•-':·.· . · . I . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (First Edition) A number of people have assisted in the preparation of this booklet, both in technical advice and in reviewing the text. Particular thanks are due to a number of officers of the Soil Conservation Authority, particularly Mr. Graydon Findlay, the Authority's Chief Engineer. Also, the assistance of the following is greatly appreciated: Mr. John Mapson, State Rivers and Water Supply Commission, Messrs. Cliff Lawton and Peter Nash of the Road Construction Authority, and Mr. Don Thomson and his staff of the Dandenong Valley Authority who assisted greatly in providing technical input and advice on the presentation of the booklet. INTRODUCTION Each year, an increasing area of agricultural and open land is converted to urban use for houses, shopping centres, factories, roads, schools and other facilities.
  • Geologic Map and Upper Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Marble Canyon Area, Cottonwood Canyon Quadrangle, Death Valley National Park, Inyo County, California

    Geologic Map and Upper Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Marble Canyon Area, Cottonwood Canyon Quadrangle, Death Valley National Park, Inyo County, California

    Geologic Map and Upper Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Marble Canyon Area, Cottonwood Canyon Quadrangle, Death Valley National Park, Inyo County, California By Paul Stone, Calvin H. Stevens, Paul Belasky, Isabel P. Montañez, Lauren G. Martin, Bruce R. Wardlaw, Charles A. Sandberg, Elmira Wan, Holly A. Olson, and Susan S. Priest Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3298 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover View of Marble Canyon area, California, showing dark rocks of Mississippian Indian Springs Formation and Pennsylvanian Bird Spring Formation overlying light rocks of Mississippian Santa Rosa Hills Limestone in middle distance. View is southeast toward Emigrant Wash and Tucki Mountain in distance. U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Stone, P., Stevens, C.H., Belasky, P., Montanez, I.P., Martin, L.G., Wardlaw, B.R., Sandberg, C.A., Wan, E., Olson, H.A., and Priest, S.S., 2014, Geologic map and upper Paleozoic stratigraphy of the Marble Canyon area, Cottonwood Canyon quadrangle, Death Valley National Park, Inyo County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3298, scale 1:24,000, 59 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sim3298.
  • The National Park System

    The National Park System

    January 2009 Parks and Recreation in the United States The National Park System Margaret Walls BACKGROUNDER 1616 P St. NW Washington, DC 20036 202-328-5000 www.rff.org Resources for the Future Walls Parks and Recreation in the United States: The National Park System Margaret Walls∗ Introduction The National Park Service, a bureau within the U.S. Department of the Interior, is responsible for managing 391 sites—including national monuments, national recreation areas, national rivers, national parks, various types of historic sites, and other categories of protected lands—that cover 84 million acres. Some of the sites, such as Yellowstone National Park and the Grand Canyon, are viewed as iconic symbols of America. But the National Park Service also manages a number of small historical sites, military parks, scenic parkways, the National Mall in Washington, DC, and a variety of other protected locations. In this backgrounder, we provide a brief history of the Park Service, show trends in land acreage managed by the bureau and visitation at National Park Service sites over time, show funding trends, and present the challenges and issues facing the Park Service today. History National parks were created before there was a National Park Service. President Ulysses S. Grant first set aside land for a “public park” in 1872 with the founding of Yellowstone. Yosemite, General Grant (now part of Kings Canyon), and Sequoia National Parks in California were created in 1890, and nine years later Mount Rainier National Park was set aside in Washington. With passage of the Antiquities Act in 1906, the President was granted authority to declare historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and sites of scientific interest as national monuments.
  • 3.6 Riverflow Issues

    3.6 Riverflow Issues

    AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES CHAPTER 3 3.6 RIVERFLOW ISSUES 3.6.1 INTRODUCTION This section considers the potential effects of interim surplus criteria on three types of releases from Glen Canyon Dam and Hoover Dam. The Glen Canyon Dam releases analyzed are those needed for restoration of beaches and habitat along the Colorado River between the Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead, and for a yet to be defined program of low steady summer flows to be provided for the study and recovery of endangered Colorado River fish, in years when releases from the dam are near the minimum. The Hoover Dam releases analyzed are the frequency of flood releases from the dam and the effect of flood flows along the river downstream of Hoover Dam. 3.6.2 BEACH/HABITAT-BUILDING FLOWS The construction and operation of Glen Canyon Dam has caused two major changes related to sediment resources downstream in Glen Canyon and Grand Canyon. The first is reduced sediment supply. Because the dam traps virtually all of the incoming sediment from the Upper Basin in Lake Powell, the Colorado River is now released from the dam as clear water. The second major change is the reduction in the high water zone from the level of pre-dam annual floods to the level of powerplant releases. Thus, the height of annual sediment deposition and erosion has been reduced. During the investigations leading to the preparation of the Operation of Glen Canyon Dam Final EIS (Reclamation, 1995b), the relationships between releases from the dam and downstream sedimentation processes were brought sharply into focus, and flow patterns designed to conserve sediment for building beaches and habitat (i.e., beach/habitat-building flow, or BHBF releases) were identified.