DOCSLIB.ORG

Standards for Old World Primates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standards for Old World Primates Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Standards For Old World Primates Version: December 2019 ©2013 Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Old World Primate Sanctuaries Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... III GFAS PRINCIPLES ................................................................................................................................... III ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS .................................................................................. 2 STANDARDS UPDATES ........................................................................................................................... 5 OLD WORLD PRIMATE STANDARDS ................................................................................................. 2 OLD WORLD PRIMATE HOUSING ....................................................................................................... 2 H-1 TYPES OF SPACE AND SIZE ......................................................................................................................... 2 H-2 CONTAINMENT ............................................................................................................................................. 6 H-3 GROUND AND PLANTINGS ....................................................................................................................... 10 H-4 TRANSFER DOORS .................................................................................................................................... 11 H-5 SHELTER .................................................................................................................................................... 13 H-6 ENCLOSURE FURNISHINGS ...................................................................................................................... 13 H-7 SANITATION .............................................................................................................................................. 15 H-8 TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY, VENTILATION, LIGHTING ...................................................................... 17 NUTRITION REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................ 19 N-1. WATER ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 N-2. DIET ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 N-3. FOOD PRESENTATION AND FEEDING TECHNIQUES ........................................................................... 21 N-4. FOOD STORAGE ........................................................................................................................................ 22 N-5. FOOD HANDLING ..................................................................................................................................... 23 VETERINARY CARE ............................................................................................................................... 23 V-1. GENERAL MEDICAL PROGRAM AND STAFFING .................................................................................. 23 V-2. ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE VETERINARY FACILITIES ............................................................................. 24 V-3. PREVENTATIVE MEDICINE PROGRAM .................................................................................................. 25 V-4. DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, SURGICAL, TREATMENT AND NECROPSY FACILITIES .............................. 26 V-5. QUARANTINE AND ISOLATION OF PRIMATES ...................................................................................... 27 V-6. MEDICAL RECORDS AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ....................................................................... 28 V-7. BREEDING ................................................................................................................................................. 29 V-8. ZOONOTIC DISEASE PROGRAM .............................................................................................................. 31 V-9. EUTHANASIA……………………………..……………………………………………………………………. 32 WELL-BEING AND HANDLING OF PRIMATES .............................................................................. 33 W-1. PHYSICAL WELL-BEING ........................................................................................................................ 33 W-2. SOCIAL HOUSING .................................................................................................................................... 34 W-3. INTRODUCTION OF UNFAMILIAR INDIVIDUALS ................................................................................. 37 W-4. BEHAVIORAL/PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING .................................................................................. 38 W-5. OLD WORLD PRIMATE-CAREGIVER RELATIONSHIPS ...................................................................... 39 W-6. HANDLING AND RESTRAINT ................................................................................................................. 40 W-7. ANIMAL TRANSPORT……………………………………………………………………………………... 42 OLD WORLD PRIMATES BEING RELEASED TO THE WILD ...................................................... 43 R-1. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................................. 43 i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Old World Primate Sanctuaries R-2. RESCUE OF PRIMATES ............................................................................................................................ 70 R-3. EVALUATION OF SUITABILITY FOR RELEASE ..................................................................................... 70 R-4. QUARANTINE AND PRERELEASE HOUSING ......................................................................................... 45 R-5. DIET, NUTRITION AND FORAGING SKILLS .......................................................................................... 48 R-6. HUSBANDRY AND HEALTH .................................................................................................................... 48 R-7. HEALTH AND SAFETY OF CAREGIVERS WORKING WITH RELEASABLE PRIMATES .................... 49 R-8. ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH AND SKILLS ................................................................................................. 49 R-9. DETERMINING APPROPRIATE RELEASE SITES ................................................................................... 50 R-10. THE RELEASE PROCESS AND POST RELEASE MONITORING.......................................................... 51 INTRODUCTION GFAS PRINCIPLES The Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries (GFAS) will designate an organization as “verified” or “accredited” based upon its substantial compliance with the standards listed below. GFAS recognizes that some organizations under consideration will operate valid rescue and rehabilitation programs with a goal of releasing wildlife to the wild pursuant to IUCN and/or other international or national standards. For those animals, lifetime sanctuary care may not be part of the organization’s mission. While the care for these animals may be provided on an interim basis only, the organization is still expected to meet the standards below with regard to all animals in its care and for purposes of these standards it will be identified as a “sanctuary.” Consistent with GFAS’ philosophy and the standards below, it is expected that a sanctuary does not adopt policy positions that are in opposition to the welfare of the species of animals in the care of the sanctuary (for example, while it is not required that a primate sanctuary affirmatively promote a policy against laboratory research using primates, it should not promote a policy in favor of such research). Note: Several standards make reference to a sanctuary’s “Director.” GFAS recognizes that a sanctuary may use a different title, and the term “Director” is intended to reference the sanctuary’s Sanctuary Director, who may be called an Executive Director or Chief Executive Officer, etc. GFAS also recognizes that sanctuaries may rely on volunteers for certain functions, including some aspects of animal care (such as food preparation). Standards referencing “staff” may take into account appropriately qualified and trained volunteers as well as employees. ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS Family / Genus ii Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Old World Primate Sanctuaries Family: Cercopithecidae, Hylobatidae, Genus: Allenopithicus, Cercocebus, Cercopithecus, Chlorocebus, Colobus Erythrocebus, Lophocebus, Hoolock, Hylobates, Macaca, Mandrillus, Miopithecus, Nasalis, Nomascus, Papio, Perodicticus Presbytis, Procolobus, Pygathrix, Rhinopithecus Rungwecebus, Semnopithecus, Simias, Symphalangus, Theropithecus, Trachypithecus Genus Species Common name Allenopithecus nigroviridis Allen’s swamp monkey Cercocebus agilis Agile mangabey Cercocebus atys Sooty/white naped mangabey, Red-capped monkey, Sooty mangabey Cercocebus chrysogaster Golden-bellied mangabey Cercocebus galeritus Tana River crested mangabey, Tana River mangabey Cercocebus snajei Sanje mangabey, Sanje crested mangabey, Sanje River mangabey
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Body Measurements for the Monkeys of Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea
    Primate Conservation 2009 (24): 99–105 Body Measurements for the Monkeys of Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea Thomas M. Butynski¹,², Yvonne A. de Jong² and Gail W. Hearn¹ ¹Bioko Biodiversity Protection Program, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA ²Eastern Africa Primate Diversity and Conservation Program, Nanyuki, Kenya Abstract: Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea, has a rich (eight genera, 11 species), unique (seven endemic subspecies), and threat- ened (five species) primate fauna, but the taxonomic status of most forms is not clear. This uncertainty is a serious problem for the setting of priorities for the conservation of Bioko’s (and the region’s) primates. Some of the questions related to the taxonomic status of Bioko’s primates can be resolved through the statistical comparison of data on their body measurements with those of their counterparts on the African mainland. Data for such comparisons are, however, lacking. This note presents the first large set of body measurement data for each of the seven species of monkeys endemic to Bioko; means, ranges, standard deviations and sample sizes for seven body measurements. These 49 data sets derive from 544 fresh adult specimens (235 adult males and 309 adult females) collected by shotgun hunters for sale in the bushmeat market in Malabo. Key Words: Bioko Island, body measurements, conservation, monkeys, morphology, taxonomy Introduction gordonorum), and surprisingly few such data exist even for some of the more widespread species (for example, Allen’s Comparing external body measurements for adult indi- swamp monkey Allenopithecus nigroviridis, northern tala- viduals from different sites has long been used as a tool for poin monkey Miopithecus ogouensis, and grivet Chlorocebus describing populations, subspecies, and species of animals aethiops).
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomy of Primates in the Laboratory Context
    P0800261_01 7/14/05 8:00 AM Page 3 C HAPTER 1 The Taxonomy of Primates T HE T in the Laboratory Context AXONOMY OF P Colin Groves RIMATES School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia 3 What are species? D Taxonomy: EFINITION OF THE The biological Organizing nature species concept Taxonomy means classifying organisms. It is nowadays commonly used as a synonym for systematics, though Disagreement as to what precisely constitutes a species P strictly speaking systematics is a much broader sphere is to be expected, given that the concept serves so many RIMATE of interest – interrelationships, and biodiversity. At the functions (Vane-Wright, 1992). We may be interested basis of taxonomy lies that much-debated concept, the in classification as such, or in the evolutionary implica- species. tions of species; in the theory of species, or in simply M ODEL Because there is so much misunderstanding about how to recognize them; or in their reproductive, phys- what a species is, it is necessary to give some space to iological, or husbandry status. discussion of the concept. The importance of what we Most non-specialists probably have some vague mean by the word “species” goes way beyond taxonomy idea that species are defined by not interbreeding with as such: it affects such diverse fields as genetics, biogeog- each other; usually, that hybrids between different species raphy, population biology, ecology, ethology, and bio- are sterile, or that they are incapable of hybridizing at diversity; in an era in which threats to the natural all. Such an impression ultimately derives from the def- world and its biodiversity are accelerating, it affects inition by Mayr (1940), whereby species are “groups of conservation strategies (Rojas, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Ranging Bonnet Macaques, Macaca Radiata
    Flexibility in Food Extraction Techniques in Urban Free- Ranging Bonnet Macaques, Macaca radiata Madhur Mangalam1, Mewa Singh1,2* 1 Biopsychology Laboratory, University of Mysore, Mysore, India, 2 Evolutionary & Organismal Biology Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore, India Abstract Non-human primate populations, other than responding appropriately to naturally occurring challenges, also need to cope with anthropogenic factors such as environmental pollution, resource depletion, and habitat destruction. Populations and individuals are likely to show considerable variations in food extraction abilities, with some populations and individuals more efficient than others at exploiting a set of resources. In this study, we examined among urban free-ranging bonnet macaques, Macaca radiata (a) local differences in food extraction abilities, (b) between-individual variation and within-individual consistency in problem-solving success and the underlying problem-solving characteristics, and (c) behavioral patterns associated with higher efficiency in food extraction. When presented with novel food extraction tasks, the urban macaques having more frequent exposure to novel physical objects in their surroundings, extracted food material from PET bottles and also solved another food extraction task (i.e., extracting an orange from a wire mesh box), more often than those living under more natural conditions. Adults solved the tasks more frequently than juveniles, and females more frequently than males. Both solution-technique and problem-solving characteristics varied across individuals but remained consistent within each individual across the successive presentations of PET bottles. The macaques that solved the tasks showed lesser within-individual variation in their food extraction behavior as compared to those that failed to solve the tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Macaques ( Macaca Leonina ): Impact on Their Seed Dispersal Effectiveness and Ecological Contribution in a Tropical Rainforest at Khao Yai National Park, Thailand
    Faculté des Sciences Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Environnement Unité de Biologie du Comportement, Ethologie et Psychologie Animale Feeding and ranging behavior of northern pigtailed macaques ( Macaca leonina ): impact on their seed dispersal effectiveness and ecological contribution in a tropical rainforest at Khao Yai National Park, Thailand ~ ~ ~ Régime alimentaire et déplacements des macaques à queue de cochon ( Macaca leonina ) : impact sur leur efficacité dans la dispersion des graines et sur leur contribution écologique dans une forêt tropicale du parc national de Khao Yai, Thaïlande Année académique 2011-2012 Dissertation présentée par Aurélie Albert en vue de l’obtention du grade de Docteur en Sciences Faculté des Sciences Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Environnement Unité de Biologie du Comportement, Ethologie et Psychologie Animale Feeding and ranging behavior of northern pigtailed macaques ( Macaca leonina ): impact on their seed dispersal effectiveness and ecological contribution in a tropical rainforest at Khao Yai National Park, Thailand ~ ~ ~ Régime alimentaire et déplacements des macaques à queue de cochon ( Macaca leonina ) : impact sur leur efficacité dans la dispersion des graines et sur leur contribution écologique dans une forêt tropicale du parc national de Khao Yai, Thaïlande Année académique 2011-2012 Dissertation présentée par Aurélie Albert en vue de l’obtention du grade de Docteur en Sciences Promotrice : Marie-Claude Huynen (ULg, Belgique) Comité de thèse : Tommaso Savini (KMUTT, Thaïlande) Alain Hambuckers (ULg, Belgique) Pascal Poncin (ULg, Belgique) Président du jury : Jean-Marie Bouquegneau (ULg, Belgique) Membres du jury : Pierre-Michel Forget (MNHN, France) Régine Vercauteren Drubbel (ULB, Belgique) Roseline C. Beudels-Jamar (IRSN, Belgique) Copyright © 2012, Aurélie Albert Toute reproduction du présent document, par quelque procédé que ce soit, ne peut être réalisée qu’avec l’autorisation de l’auteur et du/des promoteur(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Colobus Angolensis Palliatus) in an East African Coastal Forest
    African Primates 7 (2): 203-210 (2012) Activity Budgets of Peters’ Angola Black-and-White Colobus (Colobus angolensis palliatus) in an East African Coastal Forest Zeno Wijtten1, Emma Hankinson1, Timothy Pellissier2, Matthew Nuttall1 & Richard Lemarkat3 1Global Vision International (GVI) Kenya 2University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Canada 3Kenyan Wildlife Services (KWS), Kenya Abstract: Activity budgets of primates are commonly associated with strategies of energy conservation and are affected by a range of variables. In order to establish a solid basis for studies of colobine monkey food preference, food availability, group size, competition and movement, and also to aid conservation efforts, we studied activity of individuals from social groups of Colobus angolensis palliatus in a coastal forest patch in southeastern Kenya. Our observations (N = 461 hours) were conducted year-round, over a period of three years. In our Colobus angolensis palliatus study population, there was a relatively low mean group size of 5.6 ± SD 2.7. Resting, feeding, moving and socializing took up 64%, 22%, 3% and 4% of their time, respectively. In the dry season, as opposed to the wet season, the colobus increased the time they spent feeding, traveling, and being alert, and decreased the time they spent resting. General activity levels and group sizes are low compared to those for other populations of Colobus spp. We suggest that Peters’ Angola black-and-white colobus often live (including at our study site) under low preferred-food availability conditions and, as a result, are adapted to lower activity levels. With East African coastal forest declining rapidly, comparative studies focusing on C.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandrillus Leucophaeus Poensis)
    Ecology and Behavior of the Bioko Island Drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus poensis) A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by Jacob Robert Owens in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2013 i © Copyright 2013 Jacob Robert Owens. All Rights Reserved ii Dedications To my wife, Jen. iii Acknowledgments The research presented herein was made possible by the financial support provided by Primate Conservation Inc., ExxonMobil Foundation, Mobil Equatorial Guinea, Inc., Margo Marsh Biodiversity Fund, and the Los Angeles Zoo. I would also like to express my gratitude to Dr. Teck-Kah Lim and the Drexel University Office of Graduate Studies for the Dissertation Fellowship and the invaluable time it provided me during the writing process. I thank the Government of Equatorial Guinea, the Ministry of Fisheries and the Environment, Ministry of Information, Press, and Radio, and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism for the opportunity to work and live in one of the most beautiful and unique places in the world. I am grateful to the faculty and staff of the National University of Equatorial Guinea who helped me navigate the geographic and bureaucratic landscape of Bioko Island. I would especially like to thank Jose Manuel Esara Echube, Claudio Posa Bohome, Maximilliano Fero Meñe, Eusebio Ondo Nguema, and Mariano Obama Bibang. The journey to my Ph.D. has been considerably more taxing than I expected, and I would not have been able to complete it without the assistance of an expansive list of people. I would like to thank all of you who have helped me through this process, many of whom I lack the space to do so specifically here.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Behavior of Wild Chimpanzees in the Taï National Park
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 78547-573 (1989) Hunting Behavior of Wild Chimpanzees in the Tai’ National Park CHRISTOPHE BOESCH AND HEDWIGE BOESCH Department of Ethology and Wildlife Research, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland KEY WORDS Cooperation, Sharing, Traditions ABSTRACT Hunting is often considered one of the major behaviors that shaped early hominids’ evolution, along with the shift toward a drier and more open habitat. We suggest that a precise comparison of the hunting behavior of a species closely related to man might help us understand which aspects of hunting could be affected by environmental conditions. The hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees is discussed, and new observations on a population living in the tropical rain forest of the TaY National Park, Ivory Coast, are presented. Some of the forest chimpanzees’ hunting performances are similar to those of savanna-woodlands populations; others are different. Forest chimpanzees have a more specialized prey image, intentionally search for more adult prey, and hunt in larger groups and with a more elaborate cooperative level than sa- vanna-woodlands chimpanzees. In addition, forest chimpanzees tend to share meat more actively and more frequently. These findings are related to some theories on aspects of hunting behavior in early hominids and discussed in order to understand some factors influencing the hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees. Finally, the hunting behavior of primates is compared with that of social carnivores. Hunting is generally
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on 4×4 Philatelic Latin Squares
    Comments on 4×4 philatelic Latin squares Peter D. Loly and George P. H. Styan compiled: February 13, 2010 Courtesy of George P. H. Styan Courtesy George P. H. Styan Figure 1. Four international scientific congresses: Canada 1972, PLS type a324. Postage stamps are occasionally issued in sheetlets of n ties on the planet. Featured on the stamps in Figure 1 (top different stamps printed in an n × n array containing n of row, left to right) are: (1) aerial map photography, for the each of the n stamps. Sometimes the n × n array forms 12th Congress of the International Society of Photogram- what we call a philatelic Latin square (PLS): each of the metry, (2) contour lines, the 6th International Conference of n stamps appears exactly once in each row and exactly once the International Cartographic Association, (3) a geological in each column. In Figure 1 we display such a sheetlet (in fault (cross-section of the crust of the earth, showing differ- full with selvage) with n = 4: In July–August 1972, Canada ent layers of material), for the 24th International Geological hosted four international congresses concerned with the ex- Congress, (4) aerial view, for the 22nd International Geo- ploration and development of the earth and man’s activi- graphical Congress. 2 CHANCE, Volume 23, Issue 1, Winter 2010 compiled February 13, 2010 Table 1. Standard-form 4 × 4 Latin squares and PLS counts and examples. total PLS Sudoku numbers special special WWF Macau Figure topic country year WWF type form of PLS identified backwards a234 block-Latin 56 45 2 2 Mickey
    [Show full text]
  • Common Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes), Moun
    KroeberAnthropological Society Papers, Nos. 71-72, 1990 Colobine Socioecology and Female-bonded Models of Primate Social Structure Craig B. Stanford Ecological models ofprimate social systems have been used extensively to explain the variationsfound in social organization among living primates and to accountforprimate sociality itself. Recent attempts to characterize primate social systems as either 'female-bonded" or "non-female-bonded" establish a typology that does notfully consider the variation inpatterns ofsex-biased dispersal seen in the Primate order. Thispaper uses as its example the Old World monkey subfamily Colobinae to show that ecologi- cal models are basedprimarily onfrugivorous, territorialpinmates. The models are inadequate to explain patterns ofintergroup competition and should not be usedfor setting general rulesforprimate societies. Apreliminary alternative view ofsex-biased dispersal that is basedonfrequency dependence is offered. INTRODUCTION bonded according to each species' typical pattern Trivers (1972) and Emlen and Oring (1977) of sex-biased dispersal. Males are assumed to outlined the hypothesis that females and males have a greater lifetime reproductive potential than have been selected to invest their lifetime energies females, and in most species they invest less in differently: females in maintaining access to offspring than do females (Trivers 1972). Since maintenance and growth resources, in order to food intake for an individual female primate is invest most in their offspring; and males in a maximized by feeding singly, the evolution of reproductive strategy that maximizes access to fe- primate sociality suggests that there is some bene- males, investing relatively little in offspring. In fit accruing to females who forage as a group. short, females should compete for food, and Wrangham (1980) considered this benefit, which males should compete for females.
    [Show full text]
  • Associations Between Nutrition, Gut Microbial Communities, and Health in Nonhuman Primates
    Associations Between Nutrition, Gut Microbial Communities, and Health in Nonhuman Primates A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Jonathan Brent Clayton IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Advised by Drs. Timothy J. Johnson and Michael P. Murtaugh December 2015 © Jonathan Brent Clayton 2015 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisors, Drs. Timothy Johnson and Michael Murtaugh, for believing in my abilities from day one, and helping me to design a thesis project based on my research interests and passion for nonhuman primate health. I would like to thank my aforementioned advisors and remaining committee members, Drs. Ken Glander, Herbert Covert and Dominic Travis for their daily guidance, unwavering support, and embarking on this journey with me. I would also like to thank Dr. Mark Rutherford, Lisa Hubinger, and Kate Barry for taking care of administrative matters. I am thankful for the incredible group of colleagues in the Johnson lab for their support, helpfulness, and friendship; Jessica Danzeisen, Kyle Case, Dr. Bonnie Youmans, Dr. Elicia Grace, and Dr. Kevin Lang. I am also thankful to the members of the Knights lab, Pajau Vangay and Tonya Ward for their help with data analysis and copious constructive feedback. I would like to thank Dr. Steve Ross and the Lester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes staff for training me on behavioral data collection methodology, which was a critical step in preparation for data collection in Vietnam. I am also thankful to Francis Cabana for helping to analyze the feeding ecology and nutritional analysis data.
    [Show full text]
  • Semnopithecus Entellus) in the ARAVALLI HILLS of RAJASTHAN, INDIA
    Contents TIGERPAPER Population Ecology of Hanuman Langurs in the Aravalli Hills of Rajasthan, India.................................................................. 1 Status and Conservation of Gangetic Dolphin in the Karnali River, Nepal........................................................................... 8 Population Estimation of Tigers in Maharashtra............................. 11 Use of Capped Langur Habitat Suitability Analysis in Planning And Management of Upland Protected Areas in Bangladesh......... 13 Eco-Friendly Management of Rose-Ringed Parakeet in Winter Maize Crop................................................................. 23 The Wildlife Value: Example from West Papua, Indonesia.............. 27 The Butterfly Fauna of Visakhapatnam in South India.................... 30 FOREST NEWS What Were the Most Significant Developments in the Forestry Sector in Asia-Pacific in 2002?................................................. 1 Update on the Search for Excellence in Forest Management in Asia-Pacific.......................................................................... 6 Seeking New Highs for Mountain Area Development..................... 8 Adaptive Collaborative Management of Community Forests: An Option for Asia?................................................................ 8 Staff Movement........................................................................ 9 What’s the Role of Forests in Sustainable Water Management? 10 New RAP Forestry Publications.................................................. 12
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Raiding by Wild Vertebrates in the Illubabor Zone, Ethiopia
    C rop Raiding by Wild Vertebrates in the Illubabor Zone, Ethiopia Courtney Quirin A report submitted in partial fulfilment of the Post-graduate Diploma in Wildlife Management University of Otago 2005 University of Otago Department of Zoology P.O. Box 56, Dunedin New Zealand WLM Report Number: 206 C rop Raiding by Wild Vertebrates in the Illubabor Zone, Ethiopia By Courtney Quirin May 4, 2005 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary . iii Acknowledgements . vii Table of Contents . i List of Tables . viii List of Figures. ix 1. Introduction. 1 2. Methods . 3 3. Results . 5 3.1 Farm Composition and Crop Loss . 6 3.2 Pest Profiles . .. 6 3.3 Dominant Foragers by Crop . 12 3.4 Dominant Foragers by Area . 15 3.5 Analysis of the Likelihood of Crop Loss. 16 3.6 Seasonal Calendars: Raiding Intensity, Animal Activity, and Human Cultivation Activity . 17 3.7 Guarding Strategies . .. 22 3.8 Predictions and Future Management Solutions . 26 4. Summary of Results . 27 4.1 Total crop loss by daytime and nighttime foragers . 27 4.2 Summary of Sites . 27 5. Discussion . 29 5.1 Research and Site Overview . 29 5.2 Top Four Pests and Ranking . 29 5.3 Habitat Restrictions and Social Behaviour of Pests . 31 3 5.4 Impact of Top Four Pests in Wetland and Upland Areas . 32 5.5 Dominant Foragers by Crop Type . 33 5.6 Guarding Strategies . 35 5.7 Raiding Intensity, Seasonal Animal Activity and Cultivation Activity. 39 5.8 Predictions and Future Management Solutions . 40 6. Conclusion . 42 7. References . 44 4 Executive Summary Investigation Title Crop Raiding by Wild Vertebrates in the Illubabor Zone, Ethiopia Study Sites Upland and wetland farming communities in the Wichi wetland catchment, Metu Wereda, Illubabor Zone, Ethiopia.
    [Show full text]