»—M I———I CORPORATION ^3A Halliburton Company
R-31-11-4-21 \C(L
COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN
INDUSTRIAL LANE SITE WILLIAMS TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
EPA WORK ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 12.3V62.0 CONTRACT NUMBER 68-01-6699
NUS PROJECT NUMBER S217 (0718.67)
MARCH 1985
AR50000I Park West Two IMUS Cliff Mine Road CORPORATION
R-31-11-4-21
COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN
INDUSTRIAL LANE SITE WILLIAMS TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA
ERA WORK ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 12.3V62.0 CONTRACT NUMBER 68-01-6699
NUS PROJECT NUMBER S217 (0718.67)
MARCH 1985
SUBMITTED FOR NUS BY: APPROVED:
GILBERT J.^MEYER, J& y DONALD SENOVlCH [U\ 3 - " W MANAGER, COMMUNITY RELATIONS MANAGER, REMEDIAL PLANNING
IA Halliburton Company CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
2.0 BACKGROUND AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS HISTORY 2-1 2.1 SITE HISTORY 2-1 2.2 COMMUNITY RELATIONS HISTORY 2-6 3.0 ISSUES AND CONCERNS 3-1 4.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS OBJECTIVES 4-1
5.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS TECHNIQUES 5-1
6.0 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES 6-1 6.1 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION 6-1 6.2 FEASIBILITY STUDY 6-1 7.0 BUDGET AND STAFFING PLAN 7-1
8.0 LIST OF INTERESTED PARTIES 8-1
AR500003 FIGURES
NUMBER PAGE
2-1 LOCATION MAP 2-2 2-2 LANDFILL LAYOUT 2-4
ARSOOOOti
iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION
The information contained in this Community Relations Plan (CRP) for the Industrial Lane Site has been compiled to provide the lead agency with the most current overview of issues and concerns of people living in or near the affected community. This document includes community relations objectives and suggested techniques to facilitate open communication between the lead agency and the citizens of the surrounding communities. An estimated budget and a list of interested parties concerned with the site conclude this plan.
Information for this plan was obtained from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region III office files and a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Work Plan prepared by the NUS Corporation, a technical consultant to the EPA. Onsite discussions were conducted with Federal, State, and local officials and concerned citizens, in cooperation with the EPA Region III. Because this site is a Federal lead, the EPA Region III office is coordinating site activities.
1-1 2.0 BACKGROUND AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS HISTORY
The Industrial Lane Site is located 50 miles north of Philadelphia in Williams Township, Northampton County, Pennsylvania (see Figure 2-1, Location Map). The site is identified as an area of groundwater contamination in and around the Borough of Glendon. The Chrin Landfill, a possible source of the contamination, is located just south of Easton, Pennsylvania. The Delaware River is located 1-1/2 miles to the east; the Lehigh River, 1/2 mile to the west. A small unnamed tributary to the Lehigh River flows west-northwest 1/2 mile south of the site.
Land use in areas adjacent to the site includes farming to the southeast and fight industry to the north, east, and west. Residential housing exists both south and west of the site; approximately 300 families live within 1 mile of the Chrin Landfill.
The City of Easton Bureau of Water and the Easton Suburban Water Authority serve the South Easton and Glendon area. Water for potable use is obtained from the Delaware River approximately 1 mile upstream of its confluence with the Lehigh River. The majority of residents affected by the site live in the Borough of Glendon and have access to municipal water supply services. However, there are families within 1 mile of the site that either elected not to connect, or are too far away to connect to the public water supply because of prohibitive costs. They use private wells for their potable water supply. The residential wells range from 600 to 3,500 feet away from the landfill. Sampling and analysis of domestic wells south, west, and northwest of the landfill by various agencies have identified intermittent and varied concentrations of organic and heavy metal contaminants.
2.1 Site History
Although possible sources of contamination have not been clearly established, one potential source has been identified as the Chrin Landfill. Most of the preliminary investigations have been conducted at the landfill; however, future studies will
&R50QOO&
2-1 &>-^t ••'."'-'•'• — ,/' ,' -^ss .-'':•'' •'' ;
5=' /S^Vyf;!^ '"Z^J^l^ ^-^x^-^^^/V SOURCE* US6S EASTON,NO-PA QUAD. {7.5 MINUTE SERIES) 1973 n r <-• ~ n n 1 A R b « J j U / FIGURE 2-1 STUDY AREA LOCATION MAP INDUSTRIAL LANE SITE, WILLIAMS TWP., PA SCALE I"=2000* 2-2 A Halliburton Company involve other possible contaminant sources. According to file information, these other possible sources include local industry and on-lot septic disposal systems.
The landfill is located within the limits of an abandoned iron ore mine and pit (quarry) that was operated as an open dump from the late 19th century until 1958. At that time, the current owner purchased the landfill and, desiring to upgrade the facility, undertook action to convert the open dump into a sanitary landfill. Since 1961, the landfill has operated as a sanitary landfill that accepts municipal and certain industrial wastes from the surrounding area.
There are three sections of the landfill in which waste material has been disposed (see Figure 2-2, Landfill Layout). Two of the sections, encompassing 50 acres, are now closed. The oldest section (Area 1), which was closed about 20 years ago, had been operated as an open dump. A second area (Area 2) that operated as a landfill was closed in the late 1960"s, A third area (Area 3), which began operation following the filling of Area 2, occupies 29 acres and is presently active. This third area is expected to achieve final grade by December 1984.
Sampling at the Industrial Lane Site to date has focused upon characterization of the landfill's groundwater monitoring wells and leachate collection system and the offsite residential wells in the area. Numerous groundwater and leachate samples have been collected by various agencies, including the EPA, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources (PADER), and consultants for the landfill owner. These samples have shown the presence of organic and metal contaminants, with the highest levels occurring in the leachate samples.
The EPA, PADER, and a local citizens' group, Save Our Lehigh Valley Environment (SOLVE), allege that industrial and potentially hazardous wastes have been accepted for disposal by the landfill. However, no direct evidence of the possible presence of hazardous wastes on the landfill property, such as waste-containing drums, has been documented to date. Investigations conducted by SOLVE have yielded records (including manifests) from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) and the Massachusetts Water Resources AR500CC8
2-3 CM I 2 * Q. H OT UJ UJ -Jl..CO. U. o O UJ 01 CO Q AR5C:QOS 2-4 Commission (MAWRC) that identify various generators and transporters who allegedly used the landfill to dispose of hazardous wastes from 1977 to 1979. Action concerning these allegations is still pending. According to file information, these records show that approximately 630,000 gallons of various liquid wastes and 240,000 pounds of other chemical wastes have been deposited at the landfill. The wastes were in either liquid or semiiiquid (sludge) state and are thought to have contained organic and inorganic chemicals, heavy and trace metals, industrial oils, pigments, paint sludge, and various industrial solvents. ~ The detection of organic and metal contaminants in the landfill's groundwater monitoring wells and leachate collection system and offsite residential wells tends to support the claim that industrial wastes have been deposited at the landfill. However, the factual connection between the alleged disposal of hazardous wastes and contaminated water supplies is complicated by (1) the lack of analytical data defining the concentration of contaminants in the landfill, (2) the complex hydrogeologic conditions around the site, and (3) other potential sources of contamination. The landfill does not have an impermeable liner and is not considered a secured landfill; therefore, it was never approved to accept hazardous wastes. The operators of the landfill and their consultants have prepared and submitted an application for permit amendment. This amendment contains plans for the closure of the existing landfill; the operation of a demolition-waste disposal site; and the operation of a proposed 10-acre expansion landfill area. PADER is currently reviewing the permit amendment application. Permit activities to upgrade the landfill from a sanitary landfill to a solid waste disposal site were initiated in 1972. In 1975, PADER issued a permit enabling the landfill to be operated as a solid waste disposal and/or processing facility. Landfill construction plans, including the implementation of an onsite leachate treatment facility, were approved by PADER in 1976. During a routine field visit to the landfill in 1977, PADER officials discovered that the onsite u 2-5 facility had not been completed, and the owner apparently indicated that he did not plan to finish construction of the facility. PADER informed the owner of violations of the approved landfill plans, and by mutual consent, the parties agreed that there would be no further disposal of hazardous wastes. The owner submitted an application to PADER in 1978 to amend the solid waste disposal permit; PADER indicated several items that needed to be resolved before the permit could be approved. Inspections of the landfill by PADER officials in July and August of 1979 resulted in citations for noncompliance with solid waste disposal requirements. Additional inspections were conducted during 1980 and 1981, including periodic collection and analysis of groundwater samples. In mid-1982, PADER issued a Solid Waste Consent Order and Agreement. This document formed the basis for negotiation between the PADER and the operator concerning (1) the closure of the existing disposal areas, (2) the groundwater monitoring plan, and (3) the expansion of the landfill using a new, lined area. In early 1983, the operator's new technical consultant prepared a reapplication for permit amendment. Discussions between the operator and PADER currently focus on the provisions described in the Consent Order and Agreement and the plans prepared for the reapplication for permit amendment. 2.2 Community Relations History Though the landfill had been operating as a sanitary landfill since 1961, community involvement did not intensify until 1978, when the operator of the landfill applied for permission to expand the operation. Citizens began to question the potential impact of the landfill on the water quality in the area. Also at this time, several citizens began to question whether hazardous wastes might also have been deposited—legally or illegally—in the landfill. AR5DOQ1 ! 2-6 A citizens' group began seeking information in late 1980 concerning industrial wastes disposed of in the landfill, specifically, to determine whether any of those wastes were considered hazardous. In 1981, citizens reportedly requested that the PADER deny the landfill owner's request for expansion, and a new citizens' group, SOLVE, was organized. This group began requesting manifest information from neighboring states to determine whether out-of-state wastes had been brought to the landfill and whether any of these wastes were considered hazardous. The response from neighboring states concerning the manifests indicated that industrial wastes from Massachusetts and New Jersey were listed on State records as having been taken to the landfill. (According to file information, the landfill owner has suggested that at least some of the signatures on the manifests may have been forged.) The citizens' group shared the manifest information with State and Federal officials and continued its investigation of groundwater contamination in the area. SOLVE has published newsletters about its concerns, retained an attorney, and contracted with a hydrogeologist to perform groundwater analyses of the area near the site. The hydrogeologist's report on groundwater flows has been used by SOLVE to help determine flows and routes of potential contamination. Media coverage has been moderate. Newspaper articles in the past focused on the allegations that hazardous wastes were disposed in the landfill. However, more recent articles centered on the Superfund listing of the site. The owners of the landfill contested the EPA's classification of the site, which included the landfill, and described its Superfund listing as "premature." The site was included on the expanded National Priorities List in September 1984 and is now eligible for additional EPA investigation and for possible cleanup. At the present time, the PADER and the ov.ner and his consultants are negotiating a consent order and agreement that incorporates work to be done on areas of the landfill that have been closed, along with increased and upgraded groundwater monitoring. If an agreement is reached, the landfill owner could expand operations into a new disposal area, in accordance with current regulations. H\-\ R\ \ Rw n~* 'w1 P"*i i L. 2-7 3.0 ISSUES AND CONCERNS The primary concern of citizens living near the Industrial Lane Site centers on the contamination of area • groundwater and, specifically, the source of that contamination. Based on information obtained from onsite discussions, there appears to be a strong feeling among residents that the landfill is the contaminant source. However, complete hydrogeological information is not currently available to verify any single source of contamination. Further studies are planned to determine whether additional potential sources, including local industry and on-lot septic disposal systems, are contributing to groundwater contamination. Water quality is a major concern for those residents who are not connected to the municipal water supply and rely on residential wells for potable water. At a public meeting recently held by the EPA, citizens using these wells expressed considerable concern about possible health effects that could result from drinking the water. Questions were raised as to whether the EPA would sample all residential wells for contaminants and also whether the EPA would pay for alternative water supplies if they are deemed necessary for residents living south of the landfill in the direction of groundwater flow. Concern over possible health effects is further complicated because (1) it is not known what, if any, hazardous wastes were disposed at the landfill; and (2) information is still being collected and further studies are being planned concerning the groundwater contamination. The location and direction of groundwater flow has not been finalized, but existing wells (monitoring and residential) are currently being monitored. There is some concern that existing monitoring wells on site are not drilled deep enough to monitor potential movement of contaminants in the groundwater system. In addition to the groundwater contamination, residents also expressed concern about the odor emanating from the landfill and the possible health effects from breathing the air and the contact with potentially contaminated soil. 3-1 A growing concern of community members now focuses on the possible expansion of the landfill. Negotiations are currently in progress between the PADER and the owner. Residents are opposed to any expansion plans until the present groundwater contamination problem is addressed and appropriate remedial action taken. There is a difference of opinion between the PADER and the owner's consultant concerning the leachate collection system: PADER officials claim that it does not work and is not adequate, while the consultants to the owner claim that it is operating successfully. Residents have complained about this difference of opinion and are not sure what information is correct. According to information obtained from onsite discussions, residents feel that expansion of the landfill cannot be justified at this time because of the present lack of information concerning the existing landfill. Citizens believe that the past problems of operation, monitoring, and usage of the landfill must be resolved before any expansion can occur. The landfill is perceived by many citizens as a potential health hazard. Based on available information, community concern is high and will continue to increase until the landfill is closed or until groundwater problems are resolved. However, there is concern among citizens, industry representatives, and local political entities who recognize the need for a waste disposal facility in the area. The Chrin Landfill currently meets this need, and some groups fee! that its closure would create a hardship. 3-2 4.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS OBJECTIVES The following objectives are recommended to encourage constructive public interaction and to establish meaningful two-way communications between the community and the responding agencies: • To assure that all interested citizens are provided with accurate and complete information on site activities in a timely manner. • To seek citizen input on site activities and to actively involve citizens and local officials in the project. • To assure that the media is provided with accurate information in a timely manner. • To keep public officials informed of ongoing activities at the site and the results of these activities. • To reassess community concerns and to update this CRP. 4-1 5.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS TECHNIQUES The following techniques are recommended to meet the stated objectives of this CRP. These techniques should be modified and updated by reassessing community relations periodically. As has been mentioned, the Save Our Lehigh Valley Environment citizens' group is an active organization whose members include residents living near the site. This group appears to have maintained a fairly high level of credibility with State and local officials, and it has become an effective voice of the community. This group should be considered in all future community interaction. Also, efforts should be made to include in communications other interested citizens who are not members of SOLVE. ______Objectives______Techniques______ To assure that all interested Issue fact sheets on site activities, as citizens are provided with accurate necessary. and complete information on site activities in a timely manner. Maintain information repositories at the Town Hal! in Williams Township, at SOLVE headquarters, and at the Northampton County Government Center; this action will provide access to relevant public documents. Conduct public meetings to discuss project milestones and provide the community with the opportunity to comment. AR53C-OI6 5-1 ______Objectives______Techniques______To seek citizen input on site Conduct public consultations with the activities and to actively members of SOLVE and other citizens, involve citizens and local including industry representatives, officials in the project. to obtain their input on remedial plans. Actively seek citizen input at public meetings. To assure that the media is Issue press releases to correspond provided with accurate informa- to project milestones. tion in a timely manner. Provide telephone contacts to answer inquiries from the press. To keep public officials informed Initiate telephone briefings to update of ongoing activities at the site key officials on the status of the and the result of these activities. project. Involve public officials in the RI/FS process, and in the background investigation. Brief public officials on all project milestones and seek their input. Use local officials' expertise in project planning and operation. To reassess community concerns Revise this CRP periodically to more and update this CRP. accurately reflect the evolving con- cerns of the community. Prepare a responsiveness summary at the n n ET f, j"r C\ ' 7 completion of the Feasibility Stiray> ^ - - J ! ' 5-2 6.0 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES The following suggested community relations activities should correspond to the technical work planned for the site: 6.1 Remedial Investigation • Maintain information repositories. • Maintain contact with community leaders through small group meetings. • Prepare periodic fact sheets on site activities. • Discuss project with community representatives on an ongoing basis and use community resources (information, expertise) during the RI/FS process. 6.2 Feasibility Study • Issue a press release announcing the minimum 3-week public comment period on cleanup alternatives being considered. • Hold a briefing of local officials to discuss alternatives being considered for site cleanup. • Hold a public meeting to discuss deanup alternatives and to solicit public input. • Prepare and distribute a responsiveness summary. • Issue a press release on the record of decision and selected alternative. 6-1 7.0 BUDGET AND STAFFING PLAN The following list indicates the recommended community relations activities for the Industrial Lane Site and the estimated staff hours required to implement them: ______Activity______Work Hours Information Repository (1) 10 Formal Public Meetings (2) 130 Fact Sheets (3) 30 Press Releases (3) 12 Briefings (2) 30 Public Consultations 10 Telephone Contacts Ongoing* Responsiveness Summary 56 CRP Revision 15 TOTAL 293* *Work hours are dependent upon duration of the project. I-A UP \ - Ji ~" ~'~ 7-1 8.0 LIST OF INTERESTED PARTIES Federal U. S. Senator John Heinz 277 Senate Russell Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 (202) 224-6324 Home Office: Room 9456 Federal Building Sixth and Arch Streets Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 (215) 925-8750 U. S. Senator Arlen Specter 331 Senate Hart Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 (202) 224-4254 Home Office: Room 9400 Federal Building Sixth and Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 (215) 597-7200 U. S. Representative Don Ritter 124 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 (202) 225-6411 8-1 Home Office: Room 705 Alpha Building Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 258-8383 Ray Germann, Community Relations Specialist U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III Office of Public Affairs (3PAOO) 841 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 (215) 597-9871 Mark diFeliciantonio, Project Officer U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III CERCLA Remedial Enforcement Section (3HW12) 841 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 (215) 597-8185 State Senator Jeanette F. Reibman 711 Lehigh Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 258-2349 Representative Robert Freeman 65 North 4th Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 253-5543 AR5CCC2 8-2 Ronn Thomas Community Relations Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources 1875 New Hope Street IMorristown, Pennsylvania 19401 (215) 631-2420 Donald M. Becker Department of Environmental Resources P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 (717) 787-7383 Local Donald Hawkins, Mayor Glendon Borough 216 Lucy Crossing Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 252-6858 Robert Washburn, President Glendon Borough Council 216 Lucy Crossing Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 252-6858 8-3 Harold Hooper, Councilman Donald Young, Councilman Elwood Moser, Councilman George Tombler, Councilman Glendon Borough Council 216 Lucy Crossing Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 252-6858 Sal Panto, Jr., Mayor City of Easton 650 Ferry Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 250-6600 Joseph R. Fretz Box 457, R.D. #4 Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Robert Rush, Business Administrator City of Easton 650 Ferry Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 250-6600 John A. Cappellano, Director of Public Works City of Easton 650 Ferry Street b'aston, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 250-6600 ftR5C:C23 8-4 Sal LaRosa, Director of Public Property City of Easton 650 Ferry Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 250-6600 Ellerslie W. R. Helm, Chairman Williams Township Supervisors 1885 Morgan Hill Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 253-6730 Thomas W. Houser, Esquire Williams Township Solicitor 451 Main Street Box 1414 Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18016 (215) 868-0205 Eugene R. Hartzell Northampton County Executive Northampton County Government Center Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 253-4111 Mrs. Janet Siegfried Wilson Borough Secretary/Treasurer 20th and Hay Terrace Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 258-6142 AR50002li 8-5 Virginia Rickert Palmer Township Secretary/Treasurer 3245 Freemansburg Avenue Palmer Township, Pennsylvania 18043 (215) 253-7191 Anthony Razuks West Easton Borough Manager 6th and Center Streets West Easton Borough, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 252-6651 Citizens Flare Deegan, Coordinator Marge Tombler, Coordinator Save Our Lehigh Valley Environment P.O. Box 67 Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 253-7336 Neal Siteer 875 Industrial Drive Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Sheila Brandan R.D. #4 Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Phyllis Carlson 319 Clinton Terrace Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 8-6 Evelyn Bare Route #4, Box 200 C Raubsville, Pennsylvania 18042 Helen and Charles Nausbaum 2121 Northampton Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 James G. Kellar Kellar and Kantra 34 South 5th Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Jay H. Karsch Eastburn and Gray 60 East Court Street Doylestown, Pennsylvania 18901 Gregory Chrin 400 S. Greenwood Avenue Easton, Pensylvania 18042 Caryn Bugger 1416 Hazelwood Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18018 Ed Herman Lafayette Hills Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Harry Mannon R.D. #4 Durham Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 8-7 Daniel Perrisa 2487 Lincoln Avenue Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Vince Bendar 1944 Ferry Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Richard and Lois Alien 3 High Street, Glendon Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Kay Hann 1 Chateau Lane Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 R. Bodner 149 East Queen Street Chambersburg, Pennsylvania 17201 Daniel Hawkins 215 Lucy Crossing Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Peter Mueller, Sr. 482 Spring Valley Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Valentine and Violet Pfister 1340 Industrial Drive Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 8-8 Fay A. Baylan 495 Spring Valley Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Paul and Lois Deck 240 Spring Valley Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Ray and Pauline Kindt 430 Morgan Hill Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Russell Woppel 2243 Freemansburg Avenue Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 George and Martha Connard Box 316, R.D. #4 Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Robert Oddo 225 Richmond Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Emma Ebner 204 Lucy Crossing Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Alberta Hendricks 1205 Morvale Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 8-9 Sam and Jean Losagio, Jr. 295 Spring Valley Road Eastern, Pennsylvania 18042 Walter and Betty Malloy Box 238A, R.D. #4 Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Thomas Heilman, Jr. 80 Jeanette Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Albert and Rose Difilippantonio 1134 Jackson Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Stewart Fretz 875 Morvale Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Alan and Heather Norhammer 355 Spring Valley Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Vincent Vicari C.T.S. Lmt. 4515 Bayard Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 H. Robert Daws 2810 Green Pond Road Palmer Township, Pennsylvania 18042 1n4 Dt \^ 0 •- 8-10 Donald Young 6 High Street Glendon Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Samuel Losagio 842 Ferry Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Carl Oddo 80 Echo Ridge Lane Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Raymond DeRaymond 717 Wood Avenue Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Sharon Watters 500 Spring Valley Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Robert Brandon 413 Berger Road, R.D. #4 Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Alien W. Berger, Jr. 190 Industrial Drive Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Marcus H. Brandt 1130 Raubsville Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Hn IRV Os wn -:".* . -n O' 1w n 8-11 Frederick Duke R.D. #4 Spring Valley Road Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015 RoseAnn Nahakis 1225 Merion Avenue Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Tom Heckman 131 East Prospect Street Na2areth, Pennsylvania 18064 Terry Lee 640 North 13th Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Dixie White Pennsylvania PIC 610 Hamilton Mall, #301 Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Nicholas Chrin Chrin, Inc. 400 S. Greenwood Avenue Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Resident 23^6 Second Street Avona Heights Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 AR5Q303 8-12 Resident 545 Brown's Drive Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Resident 1885 Morgan Hill Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Resident 1120 Morgan Hill Road Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Resident 121 Porter Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 Media Newspapers: The Easton Express Jim Flagg, City Editor 30 North Fourth Street P.O. Box 391 Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 258-7171 The Call Chronicle Peter Shaheen, Photographer 1101 Northampton Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 258-3000 AR500032 8-13 The Philadelphia Daily News Michael Freeman, City Editor 400 North Broad Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 (215) 854-2600 The Philadelphia Inquirer Fran Dauth, City Editor 400 North Broad Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 (215) 854-2000 The Call Chronicle Al Roberts, City Editor Sixth and Linden Streets P.O. Box 1260 Allentown, Pennsylvania 18105 (215) 820-6500 Peerless Publication P.O. Box D Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015 Television: WCAU Channel 10 Jay Newman, News Director Monument and City Avenues Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19131 (215) 581-5510 /I ft 5 • : - n o ~ ' 8-14 KYW Channel 13 Randy Coverington, News Director Fifth and Market Streets Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 (215) 238-4700 WPVI Channel 6 Alan Nesbitt, News Director 4100 City Line Avenue Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19131 (215) 878-9700 WFMZ Channel 69 Brad Rinehart, News Director 100 East Rock Road Allentown, Pennsylvania 18103 (215) 797-4530 WLVT Channel 39 Donald Robert, News Director Mountain Drive . Bethleham, Pennsylania 18015 (215) 867-4677 Radio: WEST and WLEV Timothy Cain, News Director 436 Northampton Street Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 250-9600 n p q •-. n n O I, H I \ o _ _• v o "4 8-15 WE EX and WQQQ Mark Clifford, News Director P.O. Box 190 Easton, Pennsylvania 18042 (215) 258-6155 WJRH Lafayette College Easton, Pennsylvania 18301 (215) 250-5316 • • i I u J -.' *'~ ' *-J' 0 K 8-16