SCOTTISH BIRDS J({.T;.Ij~ /~ ! \ ,~
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Orkney Native Wildlife Project
The Orkney Native Wildlife Project Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report June 2020 1 / 31 Orkney Native Wildlife Project Environmental Report 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Project Summary and Objectives ............................................................................. 4 1.2 Policy Context............................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Related Plans, Programmes and Strategies ............................................................ 4 2. SEA METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Topics within the scope of assessment .............................................................. 6 2.2 Assessment Approach .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 SEA Objectives .......................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Limitations to the Assessment ................................................................................. 8 3. ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROJECT AREA ............................. 8 3.1 Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna ................................................................................... 8 3.2 Population and Human Health .................................................................................. 9 -
Walking in and Around Dalbeattie and Colvend
1 WALKING in and around Dalbeattie & Colvend The natural place to walk 3 3 Kippford The Dalbeattie and Colvend area is one of the most beautiful and diverse in Dumfries & Galloway with scenery ranging from forest to woodland and from saltmarsh to rocky coast. The area is also home to the town of Dalbeattie, the picturesque coastal villages of Rockcliffe and Kippford, and the popular Sandyhills beach. The variety of habitats support an abundance of wildlife. Red squirrels are a common sight, colourful dragonflies skim the surface of lochs and birdlife abounds. Look out for sparrowhawks, peregrine falcon perching on rocky outcrops and the many waders such as oystercatcher feeding on the mudflats. The area is particularly renowned for its rich diversity of butterfly species including the small copper, pearl bordered fritillary and purple hairstreak. Plant highlights include the shimmering carpets of bluebells in May and the tapestries of tiny coastal flowers such as English stonecrop and birds foot trefoil during June and July. Those interested in archaeology can visit the Iron Age fort sites of Mote of Mark and Castle Point on the coast near Rockcliffe. The town of Dalbeattie provides a good range of services and Rockcliffe has been a choice holiday village since Victorian times. 4 5 THE WALKS Wick Dumfries A 7 1 A 3 A75 7 1 6 Rounall Wood ...........................................8 2 Inverness 1 1 Aberdeen 7 A 2 Dalbeattie Forest Easy Access Trail A 74 5 Castle (and other waymarked routes).............10 DALBEATTIE 0 1 7 Edinburgh Douglas -
Meeting with Police 4 November 2003
Scheme THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL Community Services: Highland Area RAUC Local Co-ordination Meeting Job No. File No. No. of Pages 4 SUMMARY NOTES OF MEETING + Appendices Meeting held to Discuss: Various Date/Time of Meeting: 22nd April 2021 at 10.30 Issue Date* 26/04/2021 Author Kirsten Donald Draft No. 1 REF ACTIONS 1.0 Attending / Contact Details Highland Council Community Services; Area Roads Alistair MacLeod [email protected] Alison MacLeod [email protected] Jonathan Gunn [email protected] Adam Lapinski [email protected] Holly Fraser [email protected] Andrew MacIver [email protected] Lucy Tonkin [email protected] Kevin fulton [email protected] Openreach Duncan MacLennan [email protected] Bruce McClory [email protected] Scottish & Southern Energy Andrew Ewing [email protected] Gary Hay [email protected] Scottish Water Darren Pointer [email protected] Emma west [email protected] Bear Scotland Mike Gray [email protected] SGN Alex Torrance [email protected] Martin Gemmell [email protected] Network Rail David Murdoch [email protected] 2.0 Apologies / Others Courtney Mitchel [email protected] 3.0 Minutes of previous Highland RAUC Meeting Previous Minutes Accepted 4.0 HC Roads Inverness Currently carrying out resurfacing works @ B851 – B861 then move to Inverness city centre week commencing 04/05/21. Academy Street / Chapel street – Friars lane resurfacing will commence weekend 24th April. Alex mention some conflict of works @ Drummond Road as 120m need to be done starting 05/05/21 and will continue for 5 weeks, but Allan Hog was going to defer HC works. -
The Biology and Management of the River Dee
THEBIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OFTHE RIVERDEE INSTITUTEofTERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY NATURALENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL á Natural Environment Research Council INSTITUTE OF TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY The biology and management of the River Dee Edited by DAVID JENKINS Banchory Research Station Hill of Brathens, Glassel BANCHORY Kincardineshire 2 Printed in Great Britain by The Lavenham Press Ltd, Lavenham, Suffolk NERC Copyright 1985 Published in 1985 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Administrative Headquarters Monks Wood Experimental Station Abbots Ripton HUNTINGDON PE17 2LS BRITISH LIBRARY CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATIONDATA The biology and management of the River Dee.—(ITE symposium, ISSN 0263-8614; no. 14) 1. Stream ecology—Scotland—Dee River 2. Dee, River (Grampian) I. Jenkins, D. (David), 1926– II. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Ill. Series 574.526323'094124 OH141 ISBN 0 904282 88 0 COVER ILLUSTRATION River Dee west from Invercauld, with the high corries and plateau of 1196 m (3924 ft) Beinn a'Bhuird in the background marking the watershed boundary (Photograph N Picozzi) The centre pages illustrate part of Grampian Region showing the water shed of the River Dee. Acknowledgements All the papers were typed by Mrs L M Burnett and Mrs E J P Allen, ITE Banchory. Considerable help during the symposium was received from Dr N G Bayfield, Mr J W H Conroy and Mr A D Littlejohn. Mrs L M Burnett and Mrs J Jenkins helped with the organization of the symposium. Mrs J King checked all the references and Mrs P A Ward helped with the final editing and proof reading. The photographs were selected by Mr N Picozzi. The symposium was planned by a steering committee composed of Dr D Jenkins (ITE), Dr P S Maitland (ITE), Mr W M Shearer (DAES) and Mr J A Forster (NCC). -
Genetic Structure in Orkney Island Mice
Genetic structure in Orkney island mice: isolation promotes morphological diversification P Chevret, Lionel Hautier, Guila Ganem, Jeremy Herman, Sylvie Agret, Jean-Christophe Auffray, Sabrina Renaud To cite this version: P Chevret, Lionel Hautier, Guila Ganem, Jeremy Herman, Sylvie Agret, et al.. Genetic structure in Orkney island mice: isolation promotes morphological diversification. Heredity, Nature Publishing Group, 2021, 126 (2), pp.266-278. 10.1038/s41437-020-00368-8. hal-02950610 HAL Id: hal-02950610 https://hal-cnrs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02950610 Submitted on 23 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Genetic structure in Orkney island mice: isolation promotes morphological diversification 2 3 Pascale Chevret 1, Lionel Hautier 2, Guila Ganem 2, Jeremy Herman 3, Sylvie Agret 2, Jean-Christophe 4 Auffray 2, Sabrina Renaud 1 5 6 1 Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR 5558 CNRS Université Lyon 1, Université de 7 Lyon, Campus de la Doua, 69100 Villeurbanne, France 8 2 Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de -
The Knowe of Rowiegar, Rousay, Orkney | 41
Proc Soc Antiq Scot 145 (2015), 41–89 THE KNOWE OF ROWIEGAR, ROUSAY, ORKNEY | 41 The Knowe of Rowiegar, Rousay, Orkney: description and dating of the human remains and context relative to neighbouring cairns Margaret Hutchison,* Neil Curtis* and Ray Kidd* ABSTRACT The Neolithic chambered cairn at Knowe of Rowiegar, Rousay, Orkney, was excavated in 1937 as part of a campaign that also saw excavations at sites such as Midhowe and the Knowe of Lairo. Not fully published at the time, and with only partial studies since, the human bone assemblage has now been largely re-united and investigated. This included an osteological study and AMS dating of selected bones from this site and other Rousay cairns in the care of University of Aberdeen Museums, as well as the use of archival sources to attempt a reconstruction of the site. It is suggested that the human remains were finally deposited as disarticulated bones and that the site was severely damaged at the time the adjacent Iron Age souterrain was constructed. The estimation of the minimum number of individuals represented in the assemblage showed a significant preponderance of crania and mandibles, suggesting the presence of at least 28 heads, along with much smaller numbers of other bones, while age and sex determinations showed a preponderance of adult males. Seven skulls showed evidence of violent trauma, while evidence from both bones and teeth indicates that there were high levels of childhood dietary deficiency. Although detailed analysis of the dates was hampered by the ‘Neolithic plateau’, a Bayesian analysis of the radiocarbon determinations suggests the use of the site during the period 3400 to 2900 cal BC. -
Timing of Shell Ring Formation and Patterns of Shell Growth in the Sea Scallop Placopecten Magellanicus Based on Stable Oxygen Isotopes Author(S): Antonie S
Timing of Shell Ring Formation and Patterns of Shell Growth in the Sea Scallop Placopecten Magellanicus Based on Stable Oxygen Isotopes Author(s): Antonie S. Chute, Sam C. Wainright and Deborah R. Hart Source: Journal of Shellfish Research, 31(3):649-662. 2012. Published By: National Shellfisheries Association DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2983/035.031.0308 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2983/035.031.0308 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, 649–662, 2012. TIMING OF SHELL RING FORMATION AND PATTERNS OF SHELL GROWTH IN THE SEA SCALLOP PLACOPECTEN MAGELLANICUS BASED ON STABLE OXYGEN ISOTOPES ANTONIE S. CHUTE,1* SAM C. WAINRIGHT2 AND DEBORAH R. HART1 1Northeast Fisheries Science Center, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543; 2Department of Science, U.S. -
Current Ocean Wise Approved Canadian MSC Fisheries
Current Ocean Wise approved Canadian MSC Fisheries Updated: November 14, 2017 Legend: Blue - Ocean Wise Red - Not Ocean Wise White - Only specific areas or gear types are Ocean Wise Species Common Name Latin Name MSC Fishery Name Gear Location Reason for Exception Clam Clearwater Seafoods Banquereau and Banquereau Bank Artic surf clam Mactromeris polynyma Grand Banks Arctic surf clam Hydraulic dredges Grand Banks Crab Snow Crab Chionoecetes opilio Gulf of St Lawrence snow crab trap Conical or rectangular crab pots (traps) North West Atlantic - Nova Scotia Snow Crab Chionoecetes opilio Scotian shelf snow crab trap Conical or rectangular crab pots (traps) North West Atlantic - Nova Scotia Snow Crab Chionoecetes opilio Newfoundland & Labrador snow crab Pots Newfoundland & Labrador Flounder/Sole Yellowtail flounder Limanda ferruginea OCI Grand Bank yellowtail flounder trawl Demersal trawl Grand Banks Haddock Trawl Bottom longline Gillnet Hook and Line CAN - Scotian shelf 4X5Y Trawl Bottom longline Gillnet Atlantic haddock Melangrammus aeglefinus Canada Scotia-Fundy haddock Hook and Line CAN - Scotian shelf 5Zjm Hake Washington, Oregon and California North Pacific hake Merluccius productus Pacific hake mid-water trawl Mid-water Trawl British Columbia Halibut Pacific Halibut Hippoglossus stenolepis Canada Pacific halibut (British Columbia) Bottom longline British Columbia Longline Nova Scotia and Newfoundland Gillnet including part of the Grand banks and Trawl Georges bank, NAFO areas 3NOPS, Atlantic Halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus Canada -
Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe
Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der RWTH Aachen University zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Lara Ibrahim, M.Sc. aus Mazeraat Assaf, Libanon Berichter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Andreas Schäffer Prof. Dr. Christoph Schäfers Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 30. Juli 2015 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Universitätsbibliothek online verfügbar Erklärung Ich versichere, dass ich diese Doktorarbeit selbständig und nur unter Verwendung der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Weiterhin versichere ich, die aus benutzten Quellen wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht zu haben. Lara Ibrahim Aachen, am 18 März 2015 Zusammenfassung Die Zulassung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft verlangt unter anderem eine Abschätzung des Risikos für Organismen in der Umwelt, die nicht Ziel der Anwendung sind. Unvertretbare Auswirkungen auf den Naturhalt sollen vermieden werden. Die ökologische Risikoanalyse stellt die dafür benötigten Informationen durch eine Abschätzung der Exposition der Organismen und der sich daraus ergebenden Effekte bereit. Die Effektabschätzung beruht dabei hauptsächlich auf standardisierten ökotoxikologischen Tests im Labor mit wenigen, oft nicht einheimischen Stellvertreterarten. In diesen Tests werden z. B. Effekte auf das Überleben, das Wachstum und/oder die Reproduktion von Fischen bei verschiedenen Konzentrationen der Testsubstanz gemessen und Endpunkte wie die LC50 (Lethal Concentrations for 50%) oder eine NOEC (No Observed Effect Concentration, z. B. für Wachstum oder Reproduktionsparameter) abgeleitet. Für Fische und Wirbeltiere im Allgemeinen beziehen sich die spezifischen Schutzziele auf das Überleben von Individuen und die Abundanz und Biomasse von Populationen. -
Scallop SAFE 2021
C1 Scallop SAFE April 2021 STOCK ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE SCALLOP FISHERY OFF ALASKA April 2021 Prepared by the: Scallop Plan Team With contributions by: Tyler Jackson (ADF&G-Kodiak), Jim Armstrong (NPFMC), Ryan Burt (ADF&G-Kodiak), Mike Byerly (ADF&G Homer), Scott Miller (NMFS Juneau), Andrew Olson (ADF&G-Douglas), John Olson (NMFS Anchorage), Jie Zheng (ADF&G Juneau), Kendall Henry (ADF&G-Juneau), North Pacific Fishery Management Council 1007 W. 3rd Avenue, Suite 400 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 C1 Scallop SAFE April 2021 Executive Summary An annual Scallop Stock Assessment Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) report is required by the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council’s Fishery Management Plan for the Scallop Fishery off Alaska (FMP). Under the FMP, the report is prepared by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) with input from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the Council’s scallop plan team (SPT). The SAFE summarizes current biological and economic status of the fisheries, guideline harvest levels, and support for different management decisions or changes in harvest strategies. In the absence of annual estimates of stock size, optimum yield (OY) and maximum sustainable yield (MSY) remain at fixed values, as per the FMP. Following recommendations from the SSC, an expanded executive summary with updated information will be produced as the SAFE report every other year, beginning in 2021. The Scallop Plan Team met on February 17th, 2021 to update the scallop SAFE executive summary with recent fishery independent survey information and fishery performance data. The Plan Team review was based on presentations by staff from the ADF&G, Council, and NMFS and included opportunities for public comment and input. -
Dumfries and Galloway Coast Habits Survey 2012
Radiological Habits Survey: Dumfries and Galloway Coast, 2012 This page has been intentionally left blank Environment Report RL 25/13 Final report Radiological Habits Survey: Dumfries and Galloway Coast, 2012 C.J. Garrod, F.J. Clyne, V.E. Ly and G.P. Papworth Peer reviewed by G.J. Hunt Approved for publication by W.C. Camplin 2013 The work described in this report was carried out under contract to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency SEPA contract R90077PUR Cefas contract C3745 This report should be cited as: Garrod, C.J., Clyne, F.J., Ly, V.E. and Papworth, G.P., 2013. Radiological Habits Survey: Dumfries and Galloway Coast, 2012. RL 25/13. Cefas, Lowestoft A copy can be obtained by downloading from the SEPA website: www.sepa.org.uk and from the Cefas website: www.cefas.defra.gov.uk © Crown copyright, 2013 Page 2 of 49 Radiological Habits Survey: Dumfries and Galloway Coast, 2012 CONTENTS SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 5 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Regulation of radioactive waste discharges ............................................................................ 9 1.2 The representative person ...................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Dose limits and constraints .................................................................................................. -
Comparison of Different Deployment Strategies for Bay Scallop Spawner Sanctuaries in New York
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DEPLOYMENT STRATEGIES FOR BAY SCALLOP SPAWNER SANCTUARIES IN NEW YORK Stephen T. Tettelbach, Dennis Bonal, Andrew Weinstock, C.W. Post Campus of Long Island University, Brookville, NY 11548 Debra Barnes, NY State Dept. of Environmental Conservation, East Setauket, NY 11733 Gregg Rivara, Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County, Southold, NY 11901 Chelsea Fitzsimons-Diaz, Roger Williams University, Bristol, RI 02809 John Carroll, Stony Brook University, Southampton, NY 11968 Funded through the State Wildlife Grant Program - New York Collaborators: NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation: Debra Barnes, Josh Thiel, M. Chase Cammarota Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County: Gregg Rivara, R.Michael Patricio Town of East Hampton Shellfish Hatchery: John Aldred, Frank Quevedo, Jennifer Gaites, Barley Dunne The Nature Conservancy: Wayne Grothe, Adam Starke, Joe Zipparo Long Island University: authors, plus Richard Ames, Shalini Gopie, Alex Mattis, Lindsay Moore, Kate Newman, Jennifer Rice; Ashton Schardt, Ian Simmers New York Bay Scallop Landings - Commercial - 800 700 ) 600 500 400 300 # Pounds of Meats (1000's 200 100 0 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 New York Bay Scallop Planting Methods: Overwintering and/or for Spawner Sanctuaries Study Objectives: • Evaluate Use of Suspended ADPI Bags for Bay Scallop Spawner Sanctuaries • Compare ADPI Bag System to High Density Free-Plantings NWH = NW Harbor Free-Planted Sectors ADPI Arrays 36 Arrays (3 bags ea): SI or EH 25 m SI EH SI EH 15 mm mesh