DOCSLIB.ORG

FOIA2579.1 Date of Response

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FOIA2579.1 Date of Response London Fire Brigade Headquarters 169 Union Street London SE1 0LL T 020 8555 1200 F 020 7960 3602 T extphone 020 7960 3629 london-fire.gov.uk Freedom of Information request reference number: FOIA2579.1 Date of response: 10 February 2016 Request and response: Any attachments mentioned within this response have been included at the end of this e-mai l On 10 February you wrote to David Wyatt making an information request. You asked: “… I understand that in between meetings of the LSP5 member working group, in response to questions from members, officers prepared numerous letters and reports. Could I ask you to provide copies of these, please, as I believe they will be of relevance to the information I sought below..” So far concerns your phrase “…of relevance to the information I sought below…” we have looked for “letter and reports” which have some bearing on the way the Brigade did modelling to support the proposals in LSP5, and particularly whether we modelled “…to minimise the total number of incidents experiencing increased first and second appliance response times…” (your email of 4 January 2016). In clarification of the material you wanted you said (your email of 12 February 2016) “…Essentially what I’m after, re LSP5, are the various letters and reports prepared by officers that provided information that members had requested or that officers thought would be useful in the light of the kinds of issues raised…”. We have considered your request under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). In consultation with David Wyatt, we are able to provide the following information. You may know that the Member-level LSP5 Member discussion group – which was an informal meeting of leading members – met on seven occasions between 31 July 2012 and 9 January 2013. The meeting received a series of papers, presentations or oral updates from officers on the matters related to the preparation and drafting of the draft Fifth London Safety Plan (LSP5). Matters considered at one meeting would often prompt the preparation of a paper, presentation or update to a subsequent meeting, as you would expect. Indeed, most of the papers submitted to the forum formed the basis of supporting documents published to support the draft LSP5 and the consultation process; the full set of supporting documents are still available on our website here. In your email of 12 February, you did say you had checked the website but had not found what you were looking for. For the avoidance of doubt, I would point you to supporting document 20 Operational efficiency work. This was produced from two documents on operational efficiency work, submitted to the Forum, that underpinned the proposals eventually included in the draft LSP5. You can find the published document using this link and I have attached the original two papers. In addition, we also produced LSP5 supporting document 11 on Fire service modelling which explains how the modelling is carried out. It is relatively comprehensive about the modelling and you can find this document on our website here. In advance of the first meeting of the Forum, Rita Dexter and Sue Budden gave a presentations to leading Members separately for each party group. That presentation is attached (the date in the header reflects the date the PDF was created only). Various questions were raised by Members following the presentation, and the first meeting (31 July 2012) of the Forum took a paper “LSP5 - responses to Member questions and requests” and a copy of that is attached. At the Forum meeting on 12 October 2012, the Commissioner did a presentation about operational efficiency savings, based on modelling, and a copy of that presentation is also attached. The Deputy Commissioner met with members of the Labour Group on 12 December 2012 and provided answers to a series of questions in an email to Julian Pinhey on 15 January 2013; this email is attached. In the email, the Deputy Commissioner refers to a separate response to questions raised by Councillor Navin Shah; this email, dated 31 December 2012, is also attached (the email includes the main attachment which is a schedule of the issue and responses, but excludes copies of the draft LSP5 which were originally attached). You will also be aware that senior officers and ORH did provide a briefing for the trades unions on ORH modelling on 26 November 2012; the slides produced by ORH Ltd, and used at the briefing, have been sent by separate email as they are large files. We believe that these documents are ones that provide a response to your request about modelling undertaken in connection with LSP5 and the outcomes of that modelling in terms of operational efficiency savings considered. If you believe there are other documents which exist but we have not provided, if you provide more information, we can conduct further searches. Copyright All LFEPA produced material is the copyright of the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority unless stated otherwise, and usual copyright restrictions apply. Any information we provide to you in responding to a request for information, is still the copyright of the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority unless stated otherwise. If you wish to copy any information we have provided, you may do so in any format for any non-commercial purpose provided that: • it is reproduced accurately; • it is not used in a misleading context; • the source and copyright status of the material are acknowledged; and • the material you produce is published or distributed without charge. Material produced by any other organisation is the copyright of the organisation which produced it, unless stated otherwise. Applications for permission to reproduce material for any commercial purpose may be made to David Wyatt, Head of Information Management, LFEPA, 169 Union Street, London SE1 0LL. Permission is normally granted free of charge to educational organisations. Re-use of Public Sector Information You have a right to ask us if you can re-use information for which we hold the copyright. Your request must be in writing. If we agree in principle to the request, we would communicate to you the conditions for re-use and other licence terms within 20 working days. We issue licenses, which include the conditions for re-use, on a case by case basis. To request a licence to re-use our information, contact the Head of Information Management at the above address. This does not affect our copyright. Report title LSP5 - responses to Member questions and requests Meeting Date For LSP5 Discussion Forum 31 July 2012 Report by Document Number Deputy Commissioner 2 27 July 2012 Summary This paper provides Members with responses to various questions and requests for information following recent presentations to party groups. Item 1A: Confirm what we count as part of our measurement of performance against the attendance time target. The standard (6 minutes for the 1st appliance, 8 minutes for the 2nd appliance) is measured from (a) the time an appliance is mobilised to (b) the time the appliance arrives at the incident scene. No special appliances (e.g. aerial appliances, fire rescue units) currently have published attendance times. The standard applies London- wide to any type of emergency incident. The following criterion are used to calculate published attendance time performance: 1. Arrival times for all pumping appliances regardless of location of the appliance at time of mobilisation and will include appliances from other station grounds. 2. 1st appliance and 2nd appliance is determined by the order of arrival at the incident, i.e. the 1st appliance will be the first to arrive not necessarily the first to be mobilised. 3. Mobilisations included in the calculation are for: a. incidents in London only; b. London pumping appliances only; pumping appliances from neighbouring brigades that attend in London are not included; c. appliances on the initial mobilised attendance only (e.g. not reliefs, incident upgrades); and d. mobilisations where a time value is present in the data; sometimes ‘time arrived’ is missing due to a failure (human or technical) to record the time. 4. Mobilisations are excluded where: a. the incident is a ‘shut in lift’ release not attended as an emergency (i.e. not on ‘blue light’)) [4.8% of mobilisations]. b. the calculated attendance time is greater than 20 minutes (because this generally reflects a failure (human or technical) to record a time of arrival in a timely manner [1.8% of mobilisations]. c. the mobilisation is for incident stop code ‘FAT’ (Batch mobilised to flooding incidents) [0% of mobilisations in 2011/12]. Item 1B: What would be the impact of removing calls to AFAs from attendance time performance data? There is clear evidence that crews respond more quickly to some types of incidents than others, with average speeds to fires being quicker than those to special services such as people shut in lifts or lock outs. This, in effect, reflects local risk assessments by crews. When attendance time data was last reported to Members by incident type (in the Thematic Report 10 on appliance attendance times – November 2007), the speed of attendance to AFAs was some 18 seconds faster than to serious fires, and some 24 seconds faster than the overall 1st appliance average to all types of incidents. A review of data for 2011/12 shows that these differences are the same now, albeit that attendance times to all types of incidents are faster than they were five years ago. A response to an AFA is effectively a ‘call to fire’ although only 2-3 per cent of attendances to a ‘fire alarm actuating’ turn out to be fires; the bulk are false alarms.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • London's Burning: Assessing the Impact of the 2014 Fire Station
    IN BRIEF VISUALISATION London’s burning: Assessing the impact of the 2014 fire station closures What effect have fire station closures had on response times in central London?Benjamin M. Taylor investigates n the face of ongoing austerity To its credit, the LFB collects boroughs can be divided further into measures imposed by the British information on all call-outs – including wards; however, my analysis sought government, the consequences of the type of fire, date, time of day, spatial to understand the effect of the station Icuts to public services are beginning location and response time – which closures at the sub-ward level. to unfold. One of the most contentious allows researchers to analyse the impact Deciding which spatial areas may decisions taken in 2014 related to the that station closures have had. In fact, be at risk of increased response times closure of 10 fire stations and the loss in preparation for the closures, the Open Benjamin Taylor following the closures is not just a of 552 fire-fighters around the central Data Institute used this information to completed his question of producing maps of the London area. These measures were a work out that average response times PhD, “Sequential raw data. The time an engine takes result of the London Fire Brigade (LFB) across London were likely to increase Methodology with to respond to a call depends at what Applications in Sports being tasked with making savings of only marginally, from 5 min 34 s to 5 min Rating” at Lancaster time of day and on which day of the almost £29 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Resilience/Special Operations Group Review
    Report title Operational Resilience/Special Operations Group Review Report to Date Operations DB 29 July 2020 Transformation Directorate 11 August 2020 People Directorate 13 August 2020 Corporate Services DB 18 August 2020 Commissioner’s Board 26 August 2020 Deputy Mayor Fire and Resilience Board 8 September 2020 London Fire Commissioner Report by Report number Assistant Commissioner Control and Mobilising LFC-0406 Protective marking: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Publication status: Published in full Summary This report sets out the key findings and subsequent recommendations from the Review of the Operational Resilience and Special Operations Group (OR/SOG) see Appendix 1. Recommendations That the London Fire Commissioner approves: a. The content and findings of the Review (Appendix 1). b. The recommendations of the Review. Background 1. London Fire Brigade (LFB) is one of the largest metropolitan fire and rescue services in the world and operates within a highly complex and challenging environment. The threat that emerged from international and domestic terror following the attacks in 2001 on the World Trade Centre and the subsequent challenges posed by Marauding Terrorist Attacks (MTA) has meant LFB has needed to ensure it is able to respond to these threats and mitigate their impact. As a result, the OR/SOG Department has provided the capability and expertise to deliver that response. This also included the development of a new tactical advisor role in 2001 with the creation of Interagency Liaison Officers (ILO) now National Interagency Liaison Officers (NILO). The instigation, development and coordination of the NILO role has been a significant achievement for LFB and enjoys substantial support across the fire and rescue sector and with partner agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • LFB Quarterly Performance Report – Quarter 1 2020/21
    Decision title LFB Quarterly Performance Report – Quarter 1 2020/21 Recommendation by Decision Number Assistant Director, Strategy and Risk LFC-0397-D Protective marking: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Publication status: Published in full Summary Report LFC-0397 presents the Brigade’s performance against the London Safety Plan as at the end of quarter one 2020/21 (data to the end of 30 June 2020). The report covers performance against budgets, key indicators, risks and projects Decision That the London Fire Commissioner approves report LFC-0937 and Appendix 1 (LFB Quarterly Performance report). Andy Roe This decision was remotely signed London Fire Commissioner Date on Wednesday 03 February Access to Information – Contact Officer Name Steven Adams Telephone 020 8555 1200 Email [email protected] The London Fire Commissioner is the fire and rescue authority for London Report title LLLFBQ uarterlyPerformanceReport –––QQQuarter 111202020 202020 ///222111 Report to Date Commissioner’s Board 29 July 2020 Report by Report number Assistant Director, Strategy and Risk LFC -0397 Protective marking: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Publication status: Published in full Summary This paper presents the Brigade’s performance against the London Safety Plan as at the end of quarter one 2020/21 (data to the end of 30 June 2020). This report covers performance against budgets, key indicators, risks and projects. Recommendations That the London Fire Commissioner approves this report and Appendix 1 (LFB Quarterly Performance report) prior to publication. Background 1. This is the quarter one 2020/21 performance report covering the Brigade’s activities in terms of key decisions, financial information, performance against key indicators across the Brigade’s three aims, workforce composition, risks and projects, set out in more detail at Appendix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia
    THE WINSTON CHURCHILL MEMORIAL TRUST OF AUSTRALIA 2015 Churchill Fellowship Report by Ms Bronnie Mackintosh PROJECT: This Churchill Fellowship was to research the recruitment strategies used by overseas fire agencies to increase their numbers of female and ethnically diverse firefighters. The study focuses on the three most widely adopted recruitment strategies: quotas, targeted recruitment and social change programs. DISCLAIMER I understand that the Churchill Trust may publish this report, either in hard copy or on the internet, or both, and consent to such publication. I indemnify the Churchill Trust against loss, costs or damages it may suffer arising out of any claim or proceedings made against the Trust in respect for arising out of the publication of any report submitted to the Trust and which the Trust places on a website for access over the internet. I also warrant that my Final Report is original and does not infringe on copyright of any person, or contain anything which is, or the incorporation of which into the Final Report is, actionable for defamation, a breach of any privacy law or obligation, breach of confidence, contempt of court, passing-off or contravention of any other private right or of any law. Date: 16th April 2017 1 | P a g e Winston Churchill Fellowship Report 2015. Bronnie Mackintosh. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 PROGRAMME 6 JAPAN 9 HONG KONG 17 INDIA 21 UNITED KINGDOM 30 STAFFORDSHIRE 40 CAMBRIDGE 43 FRANCE 44 SWEDEN 46 CANADA 47 LONDON, ONTARIO 47 MONTREAL, QUEBEC 50 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 52 NEW YORK CITY 52 GIRLS FIRE CAMPS 62 LOS ANGELES 66 SAN FRANCISCO 69 ATLANTA 71 CONCLUSIONS 72 RECOMMENDATIONS 73 IMPLEMENTATION AND DISSEMINATION 74 2 | P a g e Winston Churchill Fellowship Report 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • New Dimension— Enhancing the Fire and Rescue Services' Capacity to Respond to Terrorist and Other Large-Scale Incidents
    House of Commons Public Accounts Committee New Dimension— Enhancing the Fire and Rescue Services' capacity to respond to terrorist and other large-scale incidents Tenth Report of Session 2008–09 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 9 February 2009 HC 249 [Incorporating HC 1184–i, Session 2007–08] Published on 12 March 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Public Accounts Committee The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Mr Paul Burstow MP (Liberal Democrat, Sutton and Cheam) Mr Douglas Carswell MP (Conservative, Harwich) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow South West) Angela Eagle MP (Labour, Wallasey) Nigel Griffiths MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Rt Hon Keith Hill MP (Labour, Streatham) Mr Austin Mitchell MP (Labour, Great Grimsby) Dr John Pugh MP (Liberal Democrat, Southport) Geraldine Smith MP (Labour, Morecombe and Lunesdale) Rt Hon Don Touhig MP (Labour, Islwyn) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) Phil Wilson MP (Labour, Sedgefield) The following member was also a member of the committee during the parliament. Mr Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148.
    [Show full text]
  • LFB Quarterly Performance Report – Quarter 2 2020/21
    Decision title LFB Quarterly Performance Report – Quarter 2 2020/21 Recommendation by Decision Number Assistant Commissioner, Grenfell Tower Investigation and LFC-0431-D Review Team Protective marking: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Publication status: Published in full Summary Report LFC-0431 presents the Brigade’s performance against the London Safety Plan as at the end of quarter one 2020/21 (data to the end of 30 September 2020). This report covers performance against budgets, key indicators, risks and projects. Decision That the London Fire Commissioner approves report LFC-0432 and Appendix 1 (LFB Quarterly Performance report) prior to publication. Andy Roe This decision was remotely London Fire Commissioner Date signed on Monday 21 December 2020 Access to Information – Contact Officer Name Steven Adams Telephone 020 8555 1200 Email [email protected] The London Fire Commissioner is the fire and rescue authority for London Report title LFB Quarterly Performance Report – Quarter 2 2020/21 Report to Date Commissioner’s Board 04 November 2020 Corporate Services Directorate Board 10 November 2020 Operational Delivery Directorate Board 19 November 2020 People Services Board 26 November 2020 Deputy Mayor’s Fire & Resilience Board 9 December 2020 Report by Report number Assistant Commissioner, Grenfell Tower Investigation and LFC-0431 Review Team Protective marking: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Publication status: Published in full If redacting, give reason: Executive Summary This paper presents the Brigade’s performance against the London Safety Plan as at the end of quarter one 2020/21 (data to the end of 30 September 2020). This report covers performance against budgets, key indicators, risks and projects.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Fire Service: Part 1
    The National Fire Service: part 1 This year sees the 80th anniversary of the formation of the National Fire Service (NFS). That organisation came into being on 18th August 1941 and ceased to exist in England and Wales at 00:01 on 1st April 1948, and in May 1948 in Scotland. Over those six plus years there was one fire service for the whole of Great Britain – from the northernmost of the Shetland Isles to the Isle of Wight and the Isles of Scilly. When war broke out in 1939 it was estimated there were over 1500 fire brigades across Great Britain, though some say the number was higher. This discrepancy serves to underline the fragmentation and lack of standardisation of the pre-war British fire service. In fact, apart from some emergency measures to improve and coordinate fire services in Greater London in response to World War I air raids, successive governments had studiously avoided any involvement with firefighting. It took the threat of another war to create something of a ‘cart-before-the-horse’ situation whereby, in 1937, the government created a national organisation: the Auxiliary Fire Service (AFS). This assisted regular fire services in time of war and then, in 1938, finally took a grip on firefighting generally by obliging local government to establish or maintain efficient fire brigades and for those brigades to cooperate. Even so, the fire authorities in England and Wales were district and borough councils, and in Scotland, burgh and county councils, so there was little, if any, scope for reducing the overall number of fire brigades.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Update Report – Q4 2019/20
    Report title Training update report – Q4 2019/20 Report to Date People Directorate Board 27 May 2020 Operational Delivery Directorate Board 3 June 2020 Commissioner’s Board 17 June 2020 Report by Report number Assistant Director, Training and Professional Development LFC-0370x Protective marking: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Publication status: Published in full Summary This is the quarterly training update report, which is produced for the Commissioner’s Board (CB), to provide an update on the workings of the Training and Professional Development Department. These activities demonstrate our commitment to deliver the London Fire Brigade (LFB) Transformation Delivery Plan, to respond to the findings of phase one of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry and the LFB’s HMICFRS inspection report. The key updates are: The ongoing Covid-19 pandemic has led to a reduction in the number of training courses that are running. That had an effect on training performance in 2019/20, and has continued to impact training performance in early 2020/21. A report seeking to confirm what constitutes risk critical training is due to be submitted to the People and Operational Delivery Directorate Boards by 31 July 2020, along with a new training policy. The report will also seek to establish clear rules for action to be taken when a member of staff goes “out of ticket” (i.e. that they have not received refresher training within the designated time frame for that particular skill). A second phase of work is then due to commence, to address other skill areas, as well as systems considerations and delegate self- allocation to training courses.
    [Show full text]
  • LFC-0505X Budget 2020-21
    Report title 2021/22 Budget Report to Date Corporate Service’s Board 16 March 2021 Commissioner’s Board 24 March 2021 London Fire Commissioner Report by Report number Assistant Director, Finance LFC-0505x Protective marking: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Publication status: Published in full If redacting, give reason: I agree the recommended decision below. This decison was Andy Roe remotely signed on London Fire Commissioner Date 29 March 2021 Executive Summary This report presents the London Fire Commissioner’s (LFC) final draft revenue and capital budget for 2021/22 for approval. Recommended decisions For the London Fire Commissioner That the London Fire Commissioner agrees that: 1. Subject to the decisions below, a 2021/22 revenue budget of £405.4m be approved, being made up of net expenditure of £363.8m with £8.3m funding from earmarked reserves and £33.3m funding from specific grants; 1 of 87 2. The revenue estimates, as set out in Appendices 1, 3 and 4, showing proposed savings, growth and budget movements, are approved; 3. The movements in reserves, as set out in table 6, are approved; 4. The establishment changes associated with the 2021/22 revenue budget, as set out in Appendices 1, 3 and 4, are approved; 5. The capital programme with gross expenditure in 2021/22 of £17.6m, as set out in Table 7 and confidential Appendix 7, be approved; 6. The capital strategy at Appendix 7 is approved for publication. Introduction and Background 1. This report updates the budget proposals included in the Budget Submission to the Mayor in November 2020 (LFC-0432).
    [Show full text]
  • Llljid LONDON FIRE BRIGADE
    lllJID LONDON FIRE BRIGADE Decision title Key Projects for 2018/19 - Quarter 4 Reporting Recommendation by Decision Number Assistant Director Strategy and Risk LFC-0200-D Protective marking: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Publication status: Published in full Summary LFC-0200-D updates the London Fire Commissioner on key projects being undertaken within the London Fire Brigade as at the end of March 2019. Detailed status reports which show the position of each 'A' governance project are included within report LFC-0200. Decision The London Fire Commissioner notes report LFC-0200. Dany Cotton QFSM London Fire Commissioner Date / { - 7 - I <=j Access to Information - Contact Officer Name Steven Adams Telephone 020 8555 1200 Email overnance@london-fìre. ov.uk l ho London f1lt• Comrr•::.:.ionèr ,s the f,1e and rescue author I)' fo, tceëco Report title Key Projects for 2018/19 – Quarter 4 Reporting Report to Date Safety and Assurance Directorate Board 5 June 2019 Corporate Services Directorate Board 11 June 2019 Operations Directorate Board 20 June 2019 Commissioner's Board 3 July 2019 Report by Report number Assistant Director Strategy and Risk LFC -0200 Protective marking: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Publication status: Published in full Summary This report updates the London Fire Commissioner on key projects being undertaken within the London Fire Brigade as at the end of March 2019. Detailed status reports which show the position of each ‘A’ governance project are included within this report. Recommendeddecision That the London Fire Commissioner notes this report. Background 1. This is the quarter four monitoring report for 2018/19 on key projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Modelling of Emergency Service Response Times
    Spatial Modelling of Emergency Service Response Times Benjamin M. Taylor March 27, 2015 Abstract This article concerns the statistical modelling of emergency service response times. We apply advanced methods from spatial survival analysis to deliver inference for data collected by the London Fire Brigade on response times to reported dwelling fires. Existing approaches to the analysis of these data have been mainly descriptive; we describe and demonstrate the advantages of a more sophisticated approach. Our final parametric proportional hazards model includes harmonic regression terms to describe how response time varies with time-of-day and shared spatially correlated frailties on an auxiliary grid for computational efficiency. We investigate the short-term impact of fire station closures in 2014. Whilst the London Fire Brigade are working hard to keep response times down, our findings suggest there is a limit to what can be achieved logistically: the present article identifies areas around the now closed Belsize, Downham, Kingsland, Knightsbridge, Silvertown, Southwark, Wesminster and Woolwich fire stations in which there should perhaps be some concern as to the provision of fire services. arXiv:1503.07709v1 [stat.AP] 26 Mar 2015 1 Introduction The thought of a fire in the home terrifies most people. In 2013-2014 UK fire and rescue services attended over half a million calls; there were a total of 322 fire-related deaths and 9748 non-fatal casualties due to fires of which 80% occurred in dwellings. There were 39600 dwelling fires in the UK in 2013-2014, with most occurring between the hours of 8 and 9pm at night and with misuse of equipment/appliances being the leading cause of around 1/3 1 these incidents (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Prospectus 2019 the College Is the Home of Firefighter Development, with One of the World’S Largest Operational Fire and Rescue Training Facilities
    The Fire Service College Prospectus 2019 The College is the home of firefighter development, with one of the world’s largest operational fire and rescue training facilities. We specialise in equipping today’s firefighters and other emergency responders with the best possible skills and training to learn the latest techniques and procedures. With over 40 years’ experience within the national and international fire response industry we can ensure that your teams can be safely trained to national and international standards. Our unique incident ground, coupled with our expert instructors, provides the opportunity for learners to train and exercise in a realistic and challenging environment for a learning experience that is second to none. In addition, our modularised and distributed training delivery model means that many training modules can be delivered locally at a time and venue of your choice. 2 | telephone: +44(0)1608 812984 Contents Welcome . 4 Our unique incident ground . 6 Our expertise . 8 Capita People Solutions . 10 Our partners . 11 Our courses . 12 Pricing and course dates . 13 New for 2019 . 14 Apprenticeships . 16 Attract to train . 17 Phoenixetc . 35 Our facilities . 36 Location . 38 Booking information . 39 Terms and conditions . 39 [email protected] | 3 Welcome Welcome to the Fire Service College 2019 Prospectus, it not only demonstrates the breadth of training that we offer, but also reflects the great feedback and client experiences we’ve seen over the last year. Our priorities are focused on continuing to develop the College as a centre of excellence for the emergency services through partnerships and new product development that will grow and transform the business.
    [Show full text]