DOCSLIB.ORG

Office of the Vice President for Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Office of the Vice President for Research Office of the Vice President for Research Annual Report FY 2005 Table of Contents Research Funding ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Total External Funding............................................................................................................................ 1 OVPR Accomplishments........................................................................................................................ 3 Office of Research Services .................................................................................................................... 3 Office of Sponsored Programs ............................................................................................................... 4 Research Communications Office ......................................................................................................... 5 Research Compliance Programs ............................................................................................................. 5 University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc.................................................................................7 Technology Commercialization Office.................................................................................................. 7 Commercialization Alliances Program................................................................................................... 9 UGARF Funding Programs .................................................................................................................10 OVPR Research Centers and Institutes .....................................................................................................11 Biomedical and Health Sciences Institute ..........................................................................................11 Center for Applied Isotope Studies .....................................................................................................12 Center for Humanities and Arts ..........................................................................................................12 Center for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases .........................................................................13 Complex Carbohydrate Research Center ...........................................................................................14 Creative Development Unit...................................................................................................................15 Georgia Sea Grant .................................................................................................................................15 Institute for Behavioral Research ........................................................................................................16 Institute of Bioinformatics.....................................................................................................................18 Institute of Ecology ...............................................................................................................................19 Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center .......................................................................................20 The Plant Center ....................................................................................................................................21 Regenerative Bioscience Center ...........................................................................................................21 Savannah River Ecology Laboratory ...................................................................................................22 University of Georgia Cancer Center ..................................................................................................23 Appendices Appendix A: Research Funds from All Sources............................................................................27 Appendix B: Total Sponsored Awards by Project Type..............................................................28 Appendix C: Total Sponsored Awards by Agency .......................................................................29 Appendix D: Award Comparison by Sponsor...............................................................................30 D-1: Total Awards......................................................................................................30 D-2: General Research...............................................................................................31 D-3: Agricultural Experiment Station......................................................................32 D-4: Instruction ..........................................................................................................33 D-5: Public Service .....................................................................................................34 D-6: Cooperative Extension.....................................................................................35 Appendix E: Five-Year Trend – Awards and Proposals .............................................................36 E-1: Total Awards and Proposals............................................................................36 E-2: General Research Awards and Proposals ......................................................37 E-3: Agricultural Experiment Station Awards and Proposals .............................38 E-4: Instructional Awards and Proposals...............................................................39 E-5: Public Service Awards and Proposals.............................................................40 E-6: Cooperative Extension Awards and Proposals.............................................41 Appendix F: Sponsored Awards by Budgetary/Academic Units...............................................42 Appendix G: Sponsored Activity by Classification of Budgetary Unit ......................................49 Appendix H: Summary of Major Unit by Project Type ...............................................................50 Appendix I: Summary of Facilities and Administrative Costs...................................................49 Appendix K: Governor’s Existing Industry Funds Administered by OVPR ...........................51 Appendix L: Cultivar Development Research Program – Funded Projects.............................54 Appendix M: Faculty Research Grants for Committee and By School/College ......................57 Appendix N: UGARF-Funded Faculty Research Grants ............................................................59 Appendix O: Presidential Graduate Fellows ..................................................................................63 Appendix P: Foreign Travel Support for Faculty and Graduate Students................................64 Appendix Q: Intellectual Property Disclosures .............................................................................68 Q-1: Creative Development Unit: Submitted Materials........................................77 Appendix R: Issued U.S. Patents, Trademarks, Plant Patents, Plant Variety Protection........78 Appendix S: University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc..................................................80 Appendix T: Total Awards by Academic Department and Investigator...................................81 Appendix U: Funded Awards by Federal Flow-Through Sponsors.........................................193 Appendix V Funded Sponsor Type and Name..........................................................................202 Appendix W: Organizational Chart of the Office of the Vice President for Research..........208 Appendix X: Summary of Human Subjects Projects by Major Unit and Project Type .........209 Appendix Y: Gift Report to Sponsored Programs.......................................................................210 Office of the Vice President for Research Annual Report FY 2005 The University of Georgia has a tripartite Professors, OVPR operating budget, and mission to teach, to serve and to inquire into income generated by research centers and the nature of things. The Office of the Vice institutes as well as by departments. (See President for Research (OVPR) creates and Table 1.) maintains an environment that fosters and promotes UGA research and other creative TOTAL EXTERNAL FUNDING and scholarly activities. UGA research programs contribute to the general body of During FY05, UGA received $222,403,760 in knowledge, which in turn both enhances external support for research, instruction, economic development and improves the public service, the Agricultural Experiment quality of life. Stations and Cooperative Extension Service OVPR coordinates UGA research and projects across the institution. Total external scholarly activities, organizations and funding in FY05 decreased by 2.4 percent personnel. It advocates inquiry and creative compared with the previous year. External activity, identifies areas within the university funding is comprised of contracts, grants and that have high potential for research or agreements from federal, state and corporate scholarly achievement, channels resources sources as well as from private funding into those identified areas, promotes the agencies. hiring of outstanding faculty, and aids in The National Science Foundation, in its procuring and disbursing funds for most recent report (based on FY03 data), conducting research and scholarly activity in ranked UGA as follows: all areas. OPVR also works with the UGA •
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Avian Monogamy
    (ISBN: 0-943610-45-1) AVIAN MONOGAMY EDITED BY PATRICIA ADAIR GOWATY AND DOUGLAS W. MOCK Department of Zoology University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 73019 ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 37 PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION WASHINGTON, D.C. 1985 AVIAN MONOGAMY ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS This series, published by the American Ornithologists' Union, has been estab- lished for major papers too long for inclusion in the Union's journal, The Auk. Publication has been made possiblethrough the generosityof the late Mrs. Carll Tucker and the Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation, Inc. Correspondenceconcerning manuscripts for publication in the seriesshould be addressedto the Editor, Dr. David W. Johnston,Department of Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030. Copies of Ornithological Monographs may be ordered from the Assistant to the Treasurer of the AOU, Frank R. Moore, Department of Biology, University of Southern Mississippi, Southern Station Box 5018, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39406. (See price list on back and inside back covers.) OrnithologicalMonographs,No. 37, vi + 121 pp. Editors of Ornithological Monographs, Mercedes S. Foster and David W. Johnston Special Reviewers for this issue, Walter D. Koenig, Hastings Reservation, Star Route Box 80, Carmel Valley, CA 93924; Lewis W. Oring, De- partment of Biology,Box 8238, University Station, Grand Forks, ND 58202 Authors, Patricia Adair Gowaty, Department of BiologicalSciences, Clem- son University, Clemson, SC 29631; Douglas W. Mock, Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 First received, 23 August 1983; accepted29 February 1984; final revision completed 8 October 1984 Issued October 17, 1985 Price $11.00 prepaid ($9.00 to AOU members). Library of CongressCatalogue Card Number 85-647080 Printed by the Allen Press,Inc., Lawrence, Kansas 66044 Copyright ¸ by the American Ornithologists'Union, 1985 ISBN: 0-943610-45-1 ii AVIAN MONOGAMY EDITED BY PATRICIA ADAIR GOWATY AND DOUGLAS W.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Volume 9
    Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Volume 9 Editors: Charles T. Wolfe, Ghent University, Belgium Philippe Huneman, IHPST (CNRS/Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne), France Thomas A.C. Reydon, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Editorial Board: Editors Charles T. Wolfe, Ghent University, Belgium Philippe Huneman, IHPST (CNRS/Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne), France Thomas A.C. Reydon, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Editorial Board Marshall Abrams (University of Alabama at Birmingham) Andre Ariew (Missouri) Minus van Baalen (UPMC, Paris) Domenico Bertoloni Meli (Indiana) Richard Burian (Virginia Tech) Pietro Corsi (EHESS, Paris) François Duchesneau (Université de Montréal) John Dupré (Exeter) Paul Farber (Oregon State) Lisa Gannett (Saint Mary’s University, Halifax) Andy Gardner (Oxford) Paul Griffi ths (Sydney) Jean Gayon (IHPST, Paris) Guido Giglioni (Warburg Institute, London) Thomas Heams (INRA, AgroParisTech, Paris) James Lennox (Pittsburgh) Annick Lesne (CNRS, UPMC, Paris) Tim Lewens (Cambridge) Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh) Alexandre Métraux (Archives Poincaré, Nancy) Hans Metz (Leiden) Roberta Millstein (Davis) Staffan Müller-Wille (Exeter) Dominic Murphy (Sydney) François Munoz (Université Montpellier 2) Stuart Newman (New York Medical College) Frederik Nijhout (Duke) Samir Okasha (Bristol) Susan Oyama (CUNY) Kevin Padian (Berkeley) David Queller (Washington University, St Louis) Stéphane Schmitt (SPHERE, CNRS, Paris) Phillip Sloan (Notre Dame) Jacqueline Sullivan
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Rise of Sexual Violence’
    HISTORICAL REFLECTIONS/REFLEXIONS HISTORIQUES ‘The Rise and Rise of Sexual Violence’ by Joanna Bourke Professor of History at Birkbeck, University of London, and author of Rape: A History from the 1860s to the Present Violent practices, technologies, and symbols increasingly permeate our everyday lives. This is the fact that Pinker seeks to debunk. He attempts to do so in five ways: by selectively choosing his data; minimising certain harms; adopting an evolutionary psychology approach; ignoring new forms of aggression; and failing to acknowledge the political underpinnings of his own research. In this article, I will explore these shortcomings in relation to sexual violence. The study of sexual violence is inherently difficult. We don’t know how many people are victims, not how many are perpetrators. Every statistical database has flaws. Pinker had chosen to rely on the US Bureau of Justice Statistics’ National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). This is highly problematic since the sample used by the NCVS excludes some groups of people who are most at risk of sexual assault, including ‘persons living in military barracks and institutional settings such as correctional or hospital facilities, and persons who are homeless’, as well as ‘persons living in group Quarters, such as dormitories, rooming houses, and religious group dwellings’.1 The exclusion of prisoners is particularly telling since Pinker reports positively on increased incarceration rates in the US, stating that one of the reasons for the decline of rape is that more ‘first-time rapists’ have been put ‘behind bars’.2 Indeed, the level of incarceration in the US is exceptional, with one in every 37 adults under some form of ‘correctional supervision’.3 Incarceration is not ‘race-blind’: African Americans are imprisoned more than five times the rate of whites.4 Given that sexually-violent men are unlikely to give up their practices, as levels of incarceration have increased dramatically, so too have levels of sexual assault in prisons.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruit Flies to Bluebirds: Exposing the Fitness Consequences of Sexual Behavior
    Fruit Flies to Bluebirds: Exposing the Fitness Consequences of Sexual Behavior Patricia Adair Gowaty Distinguished Professor, Ecology & Evolutionary Biology CURRENT RESEARCH AFFILIATION Challenging key assumptions of predominating theories University of California, Los Angeles Science and creativity: at first glance, the two may not be synonymous. However, successful EDUCATION science is accomplished through questioning what others hold to be true which takes true creativity. Dr. Patty Gowaty, Distinguished Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, at Ph.D., Zoology, 1980 , Clemson University the University of California, Los Angeles, studies the causes and consequences of sexual B.A., in Biology, 1967 , Newcomb College, Tulane University behavior, often by taking novel approaches to interesting questions that have never been asked in quite the same way. To understand selection, she asks how variation among AWARDS individuals in mating behavior affects the Darwinian parameters of their survival and reproductive success in real time. Her methods include field study of social behavior of birds, Scientific paper (Gowaty et al. 2012 PNAS) listed as #42 in Discover Magazine’s top 100 experimental lab studies of multiple species of fruit flies, and theory; each approach discoveries of 2012 shedding light upon the origins of the health of offspring and the lifespan of breeding adults. Fellow, Society of Biology, UK (2010) Additionally, under the assumptions that individuals in all species experience social and Senior Fellow, International Ornithological Congress Committee of Representatives (2009) ecological constraints and that all species - including humans - are subject to the force of Distinguished Professor, UCLA (2007) selection, her research has the potential to inform debates about the origins of human social Elected contributor of scientific autobiography for Leaders in Animal Behavior: The Second behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012. Download
    Sydney College of the Arts The University of Sydney DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2012 THESIS THE AESTHETICS OF REPRODUCTIVE MORPHOLOGIES By Maria Fernanda Cardoso August 2012 Statement This volume is presented as a record of the work undertaken for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Sydney College of the Arts, University of Sydney. 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................. 4 List of Illustrations ............................................................................................... 6 Summary ........................................................................................................... 10 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 11 Chapter One ..................................................................................................... 16 Identifying Genitalic Extravagance and Imagining a Museum as a Means of Investigating and Communicating Strangeness in Animal Reproductive Morphology 16 Imagining a Museum .............................................................................................. 20 A Museum is Born —Press Release ........................................................................ 23 MoCO Timeline: an idea in time ............................................................................ 24 Chapter Two ...................................................................................................... 29 How to Make Your
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary: Darwin at 200 Danita Brandt1
    Commentary: Darwin at 200 Danita Brandt1 This year marks the bicentennial of Charles Darwin’s hands-on evidence for evolution comes from fossils and birth (February 12) and the 150th anniversary (in rocks—the geologic record of life on Earth and the November) of the publication of Darwin’s “extended physical record of changes in environments over geologic abstract” On the Origin of Species by Natural Selection. time. Indeed, most students will encounter fossils in their Universities, scientific societies, and disciplinary journals classrooms as evidence of change through time (e.g. grade anticipated this event by organizing meetings, theme 4 in Michigan benchmarks) before tackling genetics and sessions, and special issues to commemorate the developmental biology. This is a great opportunity and anniversary. The bicentennial provides an occasion to great responsibility for geoscience educators. We have the reflect on the impact Darwin’s work has for us 200 years means for realizing the “great expectations” listed above, after his birth, and it presents an opportunity, especially and the action plan for achieving these ideals is within the coming so near the start of a new year, to frame grasp of every educator. What follows is a vision for resolutions for the future. In this commentary I will offer geoscience education in the United States modeled on the a vision for how geoscientists and geoscience educators shared great expectations briefly outlined above: can respond to this opportunity. Nature magazine (18 November 2008) solicited input 1. Students will live and breathe the nature of science from prominent research scientists, educators, and media in every geoscience class and in so doing will replace their professionals about their “great expectations” or hoped- misconceptions about science with new understanding for outcomes of a year of Darwin-centered events.
    [Show full text]
  • Hur Görs Djur? Könsstereotyper Och Androcentrism I Studier Av Andra Arter Än Homo Sapiens Måns S
    Djurs beteende tolkas ofta utifrån andro- och antropocentriska könsstereotyper. Måns Andersson och Miriam Eliasson visar hur genusforskningen kan bidra med perspektiv på kön som förbättrar förståelsen av djur och deras beteenden. Hur görs djur? Könsstereotyper och androcentrism i studier av andra arter än Homo sapiens Måns S. Andersson och Miriam A. Eliasson Människor verkar ha svårt att låta bli att ger, genetiker, etologer, beteendeekologer kategorisera andra människor efter stereo- med flera studerar djur och skapar teorier om typer oavsett gynnsamma förutsättningar för deras beteenden och kulturer.5 Gränserna är att detta skall undvikas.1 Studier visar till inte skarpa, framför allt är ämnesbakgrunden exempel att när försökspersoner, i en experi- blandad i USA, där beteendeekologi till exem- mentsituation, ställs inför uppgiften att upp- pel kan bedrivas av antropologer på institu- skatta mäns och kvinnors längd så under- tioner för psykologi. Forskare som studerar skattar de regelmässigt kvinnors längd.2 djurs beteenden och bidrar till den veten- Även forskare som studerar djur bär med sig skapliga representationen av dem inom dessa den här sortens könsstereotyper, vilket på- discipliner kommer i denna text att benäm- verkar förståelsen av djuren, av processer nas beteendeekologer. som evolutionen och av oss själva som män- Teorier och resultat som utgår från forsk- niskor. 3 ning på djur betraktas i dag till stor del som Den ornitologiskt kunnige som slår upp en konservativ kraft i samhället av bland sparvhök i Bonniers Alla Europas fåglar i annat genusteoretiker, men den skulle kunna färg slås av att honan avbildas som likstor innebära en revolution för tänkandet kring med hannen trots att honorna i verkligheten kön och könsbundna egenskaper.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology for Feminists
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 75 Issue 3 Symposium on Unfinished eministF Article 9 Business June 2000 Biology for Feminists Katharine K. Baker IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Katharine K. Baker, Biology for Feminists, 75 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 805 (2000). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol75/iss3/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. BIOLOGY FOR FEMINISTS KATHARINE K. BAKER* INTRODUCTION Sociobiology,' evolutionary psychology,2 biobehavioralism, 3 ev- olutionary biology,4 or just biology.5 Call it what you will, it is as big news at the end of the twentieth century6 as it was at the end of the nineteenth, when the world was just beginning to appreciate Charles Darwin's Origin of Species.7 In the world of this resurgent discipline, rape is all about sex, marriage is all about one-sided dependence and motherhood is all about exploited labor. Phrased as such, it is not hard to see why many women shun the sociobiologist's world. It is a violent, harsh, and altogether horrific place for women to be. Upon further examination though, it is a world that feminists well recognize. Indeed, it is a world we have been describing for some time now.
    [Show full text]
  • Brilmyer 2017 Darwinian Feminisms.PDF
    CHAPTER 2 Darwinian Feminisms S. Pearl Brilmyer Assistant Professor, Department of English University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia At first glance, the terms Darwinism and feminism may seem to have little in common. What could the scientific theory of the origin of species as formulated by British naturalist Charles Darwin (1809–1882) have to offer the political movement for sexual equality? Indeed, given the centrality of competition to Darwin’s theory of evolution and the importance of community and coalition building to feminist politics, it may be easier to imagine Darwin- ism and feminism as adversaries rather than allies. And yet, since the publication of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species in 1859, feminist theorists and activists have found in Darwin an ally in the battle against biological essentialism—that is, the assumption that human behavior can be explained by a series of unchanging, biologically determined facts. Invoking his theory of evolution in order to critique biological essentialism, along with the gendered norms and hierarchies that tend to accompany it, feminist theorists have used Darwin’s work as a platform for social and political transformation. If, as Darwin claimed, ‘‘human nature’’ itself is not a fixed constant but something constantly changing, then, some of Darwin’s readers argued, there can be nothing natural or permanent about the subordinate status of women in society. Thus, although Darwin’s major insights may appear to be contained to the natural sciences, his ideas have served as an important touchstone for feminist activism and theory from the nineteenth century until today. That Darwinism has provided a useful set of tools for feminism, however, does not mean that Darwin himself expressed particularly progressive views on women.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Compensation
    doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01559.x Reproductive compensation PATRICIA ADAIR GOWATY Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 621 Charles E. Young Drive, University of California, Los Angeles 90095, USA and The Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948, USA Keywords: Abstract constraints; The reproductive compensation hypothesis says that individuals constrained differential allocation hypothesis; by ecological or social forces to reproduce with partners they do not prefer dispersal limitation; compensate for likely offspring viability deficits. The reproductive compensa- life history trade-offs; tion hypothesis assumes that (i) pathogens and parasites evolve more rapidly mate preferences; than their hosts, (ii) mate preferences predict variation in health and viability offspring viability selection; of offspring, (iii) social and ecological factors keep some individuals from phenotypic plasticity; mating with their preferred partners (some are constrained to mate with sexual coercion. partners they do not prefer), (iv) all individuals may be induced to compensate, so that (v) variation in compensation is due to environmental and developmental factors affecting between-individual abilities to express compensatory mechanisms. Selection favouring compensation may act through variation in prezygotic physiological mechanisms, zygotic mecha- nisms, or parental care to eggs or young that enhance offspring health, increasing the likelihood that some offspring survive to reproductive age, often at a survival
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptual Review of Mate Choice: Stochastic Demography, Within‐Sex Phenotypic Plasticity, and Individual Flexibili
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Ecology and Evolution. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Ah-King, M., Gowaty, P A. (2016) A conceptual review of mate choice: stochastic demography, within-sex phenotypic plasticity, and individual flexibility. Ecology and Evolution, 6(14): 4607-4642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2197 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-301134 REVIEW A conceptual review of mate choice: stochastic demography, within-sex phenotypic plasticity, and individual flexibility Malin Ah-King1,2,3 & Patricia Adair Gowaty2,4,5 1Centre for Gender Research, Uppsala University, Box 527, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 621 Charles E. Young Dr. S., Los Angeles, California 90095 3Department of Ethnology, History of Religions and Gender Studies, Stockholm University, Universitetsvagen€ 10 E, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 4Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Box 0948, DPO, AA 34002-9998, Washington, D.C. 5Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095 Keywords Abstract Adaptive flexibility, choosy, genetic complementarity, indiscriminate, mate Mate choice hypotheses usually focus on trait variation of chosen individuals. choice, OSR, parasite load, switch point Recently, mate choice studies have increasingly attended to the environmental cir- theorem. cumstances affecting variation in choosers’ behavior and choosers’ traits. We reviewed the literature on phenotypic plasticity in mate choice with the goal of Correspondence exploring whether phenotypic plasticity can be interpreted as individual flexibility Patricia Adair Gowaty, Department of in the context of the switch point theorem, SPT (Gowaty and Hubbell 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • 20.11 Darwin Vox Profs.Indd MH CNS.Indd
    Vol 456|20 November 2008 COMMENTARY Left to right: Mustafa Akyol, Mel Greaves, Niles Eldredge, Per-Edvin Persson, Patricia Adair Gowaty, Masatoshi Nei, Michael Lynch, Ulrich Kutschera, Randolph Great expectations Nesse, Ismail Serageldin. A new path for evolution? A truce in the culture wars? Here’s what a selection of readers told Nature they expect from Darwin 200. Patricia Adair Gowaty understand the reality of where we of fundamentalist believers in verbatim Distinguished professor, live and who we are. creation will have diminished and given way Department of Ecology & Indeed, in the grand scheme of to an understanding that science and religion N. SPENCER Evolutionary Biology and things, Darwin has given us the may coexist but that they should not be min- Institute of the Environment, remarkable means to redefine the gled. The world would accept that religion is University of California, role of humans. We are the only religion and science is science and let both Los Angeles, USA. species capable of appreciating the live in peace. diversity of life and the fragility of One sign of enhanced public understanding our ecosystems, and the only one to recognize Niles Eldredge of Darwin and the nature of science, will be our responsibility to change our behaviour in Division of Paleontology, the American quicker resolution of continuously re-emerg- order to safeguard life and the world we live in. Museum of Natural History, New York, ing controversies between the scientifically lit- During the Middle Ages, the Muslim world USA. erate and ‘creation scientists’. Other signs will showed remarkable openness to the contrarian include enhancements of public debate about view and an appreciation of evidence-backed Biological phenomena that bear on evolution scientific discovery, about funding for science, science.
    [Show full text]