09/27/21 Forensic Linguistics (ELA020X245A/S) | University of Roehampton

Forensic Linguistics (ELA020X245A/S) View Online (Academic year 2021-2022)

Ainsworth, J. (2008) ‘"You Have the Right to Remain Silent. . . But Only If You Ask for It Just So”: The Role of Linguistic Ideology in American Police Interrogation Law’, International Journal of Speech and the Law, 15(1). doi: 10.1558/ijsll.v15i1.1.

American Association for Applied Linguistics et al. (1980) ‘Applied linguistics’, Oxford Journals Archive.

‘Berk-Seligson, S. (2000) Interpreting for the police: issues in pre-trial phases of the judicial process Forensic linguistics: The B14international journal of speech, language and the law 7 (2) 212-237’ (no date) Forensic linguistics: the international journal of speech, language and the law. Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/IJSLL/article/view/1537.

BLOMMAERT, J. (2001) ‘Investigating Narrative Inequality: African Asylum Seekers’ Stories in Belgium’, Discourse & Society, 12(4), pp. 413–449. doi: 10.1177/0957926501012004002.

Brown, Gillian (1994) Language and understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cambridge University Press (no date) ‘Language in society’, Cambridge Journals Online.

Campos, L. and Alonso-Quecuty, M. (2006) ‘Remembering a criminal conversation: Beyond eyewitness testimony’, Memory, 14(1), pp. 27–36. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000476.

‘Carroll, J. (1995) The use of interpreters in court Forensic linguistics 2 (1) 65-73’ (no date). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/IJSLL/article/view/17162.

Chang, Y. (2004) ‘Courtroom Questioning as a Culturally Situated Persuasive Genre of Talk’, Discourse & Society, 15(6).

Clare, Isabel C. H., Gudjonsson, Gisli and Great Britain (1992) Devising and piloting an experimental version of the ‘Notice to detained persons’. London: HMSO.

Conley, J. M. and O’Barr, W. M. (1998) Just words: law, language, and power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Conley, J. M. and O’Barr, W. M. (2005) ‘The revictimization of rape victims’, in Just words: law, language, and power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 15–38.

‘Conversational maxims in encounters with law enforcement officers | Linfoot-Ham | International Journal of Speech Language and the Law’ (2006) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL

1/8 09/27/21 Forensic Linguistics (ELA020X245A/S) | University of Roehampton

OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND THE LAW, 13(1). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/IJSLL/article/viewArticle/1004.

Cotterill, J. (2002a) Language in the legal process. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id =Roehampton&isbn=9780230522770&uid=^u.

Cotterill, J. (2002b) Language in the legal process. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cotterill, J. (2002c) Language in the legal process. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-vlebooks-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/Vleweb/Prod uct/Index/165093?page=0&uid=^u.

Cotterill, J. (2004) ‘Collocation, Connotation, and Courtroom Semantics: Lawyers’ Control of Witness Testimony through Lexical Negotiation’, Applied Linguistics, 25(4), pp. 513–537. doi: 10.1093/applin/25.4.513.

‘Cotterill, J. (2000) Reading the rights: a cautionary tale of comprehension and comprehensibility Forensic linguistics 7 (1) 4-25’ (no date). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/IJSLL/article/view/606.

Cotterill, Janet (2003) Language and power in court: a linguistic analysis of the O.J. Simpson trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Cotterill, Janet (2007) The language of sexual crime. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-eboo ks/detail.action?docID=344973.

Coulthard, M. (2004) ‘Author Identification, Idiolect, and Linguistic Uniqueness’, Applied Linguistics, 25(4), pp. 431–447. doi: 10.1093/applin/25.4.431.

Coulthard, Malcolm1 [email protected] (2005) ‘The linguist as expert witness.’, Linguistics & the Human Sciences, 1(Issue 1), pp. 39–58.

Coulthard, Malcolm and Johnson, Alison (2010) The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. London: Routledge. Available at: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id =Roehampton&isbn=9780203855607&uid=^u.

Coulthard, M. and Johnson, A. (2007) An introduction to forensic linguistics: language in evidence. London: Routledge. Available at: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id =Roehampton&isbn=9780203969717&uid=^u.

Crystal, D. and Davy, D. (1969) ‘The language of legal documents’, in Investigating English style. London: Longman, pp. 193–217.

Cunningham, C. D. (1995) ‘Bringing Linguistics into Judicial Decision-Making’, International Journal of Speech, Language & Law, 2(1), pp. 81–98.

2/8 09/27/21 Forensic Linguistics (ELA020X245A/S) | University of Roehampton

‘Dumas, B. (2000) US pattern jury instructions: problems and proposals Forensic linguistics 7 (1) 49-71’ (no date). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/IJSLL/article/view/608.

EADES, D. (2000) ‘Silencing Aboriginal witnesses in court’, Language in Society, 29(2), pp. 161–195. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500002013.

Eades, D. and ebrary, Inc (2008) Courtroom talk and neocolonial control. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Available at: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/roehampton-eboo ks/detail.action?docID=364666.

Eades, Diana Kelloway (1995) Language in evidence: issues confronting Aboriginal and multicultural Australia. Sydney, Australia: UNSW Press.

Ehrlich, S. (2001) Representing rape: language and sexual consent. London: Routledge. Available at: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id =Roehampton&isbn=9780203459034&uid=^u.

Ehrlich, Susan (2001) Representing rape: language and sexual consent. London: Routledge.

Endicott, Timothy Andrew Orville (2000) Vagueness in law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Forensic Discourse (Continuum Discourse) [Paperback] (no date). Continuum Publishing Corporation (1 Mar 2013).

Fraser, H., Stevenson, B. and Marks, T. (2011) ‘Interpretation of a Crisis Call: Persistence of a primed perception of a disputed utterance’, International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 18(2). doi: 10.1558/ijsll.v18i2.261.

French, Peter1Harrison, Philip1 (2004) ‘R-v-Ingram, C., Ingram, D. and Whittock, T. The Who Wants to be a Millionaire? Fraud Trial.’, International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law, 11(Issue 1, p131-145. 15p. 1 Black and White Photograph, 4 Diagrams, 3 Charts), pp. 131–145. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=14962705&a mp;site=ehost-live.

Garner, Bryan A. (2001) Legal writing in plain English : a text with exercises / Bryan A. Garner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Garner, Bryan A. (2002) The elements of legal style. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gibbons, J. (2003a) Forensic linguistics: an introduction to language in the justice . Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.

Gibbons, J. (2003b) Forensic linguistics: an introduction to language in the justice system. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.

3/8 09/27/21 Forensic Linguistics (ELA020X245A/S) | University of Roehampton

‘Gibbons, J. (2001) Revising the language of New South Wales police procedures: applied linguistics in action Applied linguistics 22, 4 439-469’ (no date).

Gibbons, John (1994) Language and the law. Harlow: Longman. Available at: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-vlebooks-com.roe.idm.oclc.org/Vleweb/Prod uct/Index/2022301?page=0&uid=^u.

‘Goddard, C. (1996) Can linguists help judges know what they mean? Linguistic semantics in the courtroom Forensic linguistics 3 (2) 250-272’ (no date). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/IJSLL/article/view/17251.

Goodman, Sharon et al. (2007) Redesigning English. Abingdon: Routledge.

‘Green, D. W. (1996) Inferring health claims: a case study Forensic linguistics 3 (2) 299-322’ (no date).

Grieve, Jack (no date) ‘Attributing the Bixby Letter using n-gram tracing’, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqy042.

Gudjonsson, G. H. and Pearse, J. (2011) ‘Suspect Interviews and False Confessions’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), pp. 33–37. doi: 10.1177/0963721410396824.

‘Guidelines for the use of language analysis in relation to questions of national origin in refugee cases | LaNOG | International Journal of Speech Language and the Law’ (2004) International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 11(2). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/IJSLL/article/viewArticle/555.

‘Hale, S. (1997) Clash of world perspectives: the discursive practices of the law, the witness and the interpreter Forensic linguistics: the international journal of speech, language and the law 4, 2 197-209’ (no date). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/IJSLL/article/view/17306.

HARRIS, S. (2001) ‘Fragmented Narratives and Multiple Tellers: Witness and Defendant Accounts in Trials’, Discourse Studies, 3(1), pp. 53–74. doi: 10.1177/1461445601003001003.

Heaton-Armstrong, A., Shepherd, E. and Wolchover, D. (1999) Analysing witness testimony: a guide for legal practitioners and other professionals. London: Blackstone.

Heffer, Chris (2005) The language of jury trial: a corpus-aided analysis of legal-lay discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ho Shon, P. C. (2005) ‘“I’d grab the S-O-B by his hair and yank him out the window”: The fraternal order of warnings and threats in police–citizen encounters’, Discourse & Society, 16(6), pp. 829–845. doi: 10.1177/0957926505056673.

Ingenta (Firm) and Synergy (Online service) (no date) ‘Journal of sociolinguistics.’ [Oxford]: Blackwell Publishers.

Innes, B. (2011) ‘R v David Bain – a Unique Case in New Zealand Legal and Linguistic History’, International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 18(1). doi:

4/8 09/27/21 Forensic Linguistics (ELA020X245A/S) | University of Roehampton

10.1558/ijsll.v18i1.145.

‘International journal of speech, language and the law: forensic linguistics’ (no date).

Janney, R. W. (2002) ‘Cotext as context: vague answers in court’, Language & Communication, 22(4), pp. 457–475. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00020-4.

Janssen, Danie ̈ l, Neutelings, Rob and ebrary, Inc (2001) Reading and writing public documents: problems, solutions, and characteristics. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.

John Olsson (9AD) More Wordcrime. Bloomsbury Academic. Available at: https://www.amazon.co.uk/More-Wordcrime-John-Olsson/dp/1350029645.

Joshua Karton, Lost in Translation: International Criminal Tribunals and the Legal Implications of Interpreted Testimony, 41 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 1 (no date) ‘Lost in Translation: International Criminal Tribunals and the Legal Implications of Interpreted Testimony’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law,. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/vantl41&id= 13.

‘Jostrans: Journal of Specialised Translation’ (no date). Available at: http://www.jostrans.org/.

‘Kerr Thompson, J. (2002) Powerful/Powerless language in court: a critical re-evaluation of the Duke Language and Law Programme Forensic linguistics 9 (2) 153-167’ (no date).

Kniffka, Hannes et al. (1996) Recent developments in forensic linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang.

Language and the Law: With a Foreword by Roger W. Shuy: Sanford Schane: Continuum (no date). Available at: http://www.bloomsbury.com/us/language-and-the-law-9781441114624/.

‘Let Him Have It part 1 - Derek Bentley film’ (no date). Available at: https://rob.roehampton.ac.uk/View.aspx?id=12187~5g~7ONfMROMdA.

‘Let Him Have It part 2 - Derek Bentley film’ (no date). Available at: https://rob.roehampton.ac.uk/View.aspx?id=12188~5h~zBbEwQ8WBC.

Levi, Judith N. and Walker, Anne Graffam (1990) Language in the judicial process. London: Plenum Press.

‘Loftus, E. (1975) Leading Questions and the Eyewitness Report Cognitive psychology 7 560-572’ (no date).

Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1979) Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Malcolm Coulthard (2007) An introduction to forensic linguistics. London: Routledge.

5/8 09/27/21 Forensic Linguistics (ELA020X245A/S) | University of Roehampton

Martha L. Komter, The Construction of Evidence in a Police Interrogation, 48 Droit et Societe 367 (no date) ‘The Construction of Evidence in a Police Interrogation’, Droit et Societe,. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/droitsc48&id =33.

Matoesian, Gregory M. (1993) Reproducing rape: domination through talk in the courtroom . Cambridge: Polity Press.

Matoesian, Gregory M. (2001) Law and the language of identity: discourse in the William Kennedy Smith rape trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mautner, G. (2012) ‘Language, space and the law: a study of directive signs’, International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 19(2), pp. 189–217. doi: 10.1558/ijsll.v19i2.189.

‘Morris, R. (1999) The gum syndrome: predicaments in court interpreting Forensic linguistics 6 (1) 6-29’ (no date). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/IJSLL/article/view/618.

National Consumer Council (1984) Plain words for consumers: the language and layout of consumer contracts : the case for plain language law. London: National Consumer Council.

Nini, A. (2018) ‘An authorship analysis of the Jack the Ripper letters’, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 33(3), pp. 621–636. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqx065.

Olsson, J. (2004) Forensic linguistics: an introduction to language, crime and the law. London: Continuum.

Olsson, John (2009) Wordcrime: solving crime through forensic linguistics. London: Continuum.

Peter Meijes Tiersma and Lawrence Solan (2012) The Oxford handbook of language and law. New York: Oxford University Press.

‘Pragmatic contributions to the interpretation of a will | Kaplan | International Journal of Speech Language and the Law’ (no date). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/IJSLL/article/view/513/3888.

Rickford, J. R. and King, S. (2016) ‘Language and linguistics on trial: Hearing Rachel Jeantel (and other vernacular speakers) in the courtroom and beyond’, Language, 92(4), pp. 948–988. doi: 10.1353/lan.2016.0078.

‘Rigney, A. (1999) Questioning in interpreted testimony Forensic linguistics 6 (1) 83-108’ (no date). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/IJSLL/article/view/623. ‘Rock, F. (2001) The genesis of a witness statement Forensic linguistics 8 (2) 44-72’ (no date). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/IJSLL/article/view/589.

‘Russell, S. (2000) Let me put it simply: the case for a standard translation of the police caution and its explanation Forensic linguistics 7 (1) 26-48’ (no date). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/IJSLL/article/view/607.

6/8 09/27/21 Forensic Linguistics (ELA020X245A/S) | University of Roehampton

ScienceDirect (Online service) (no date) ‘Journal of ’, ScienceDirect Journals.

Shepherd, E. and Milne, R. (1999) ‘Full and faithful: ensuring quality practice and integrity of outcome in witness interviews’, in Analysing witness testimony: a guide for legal practitioners and other professionals. London: Blackstone, pp. 124–145.

‘Shuy, R. (1997) Ten unanswered language questions about Miranda Forensic linguistics 4, 2 51-73’ (no date). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/IJSLL/article/view/17305.

Shuy, Roger W. (1998) The language of confession, interrogation and deception. London: SAGE. Available at: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id =Roehampton&isbn=9781452262512&uid=^u.

Shuy, R. W. (1990) ‘Warning Labels: Language, Law, and Comprehensibility’, American Speech, 65(4). doi: 10.2307/455505.

Siegal, M. (2005) ‘Finding conversational facts: a role for linguistics in court | Siegel | International Journal of Speech Language and the Law’, International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 12(2). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/IJSLL/article/viewArticle/531.

Sociolinguistics and the Legal Process by Diana Eades (no date).

Solan, L. and Tiersma, P. M. (2005) Speaking of crime: the language of criminal justice. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.

Storey, K. (1995) ‘The language of threats’, Forensic linguistics: the international journal of speech, language and the law, 2(1), pp. 74–80.

Stubbs, M. (1996) Text and corpus analysis: computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.

‘Suspects’ resistance to constraining and coercive questioning strategies in the police interview | Newbury | International Journal of Speech Language and the Law’ (2006) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND THE LAW, 13(2). Available at: https://journals.equinoxpub.com/IJSLL/article/viewArticle/961.

Tiersma, Peter (no date) ‘Testing the Comprehensibility of Jury Instructions: California’s Old and New Instructions on Circumstantial Evidence.’ Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1505010.

‘Trosborg, A. (1995) Statutes and contracts: An analysis of legal speech acts in the English language of the law Journal of pragmatics 23 (1) 31-53’ (no date). Available at: https://roe.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imag ekey=B6VCW-3YCMTHS-12-1&_cdi=5965&_user=1721290&_pii=037821669400034C&_ori g=browse&_coverDate=01/31/1995&_sk=999769998&view=c&wchp=dGLbVzb-zSkzk&md 5=4b6a1b685b5aeacbf2903e758986542d&ie=/sdarticle.pdf.

‘Wierzbicka, A. (2003) Reasonable man and reasonable doubt: the English language, Anglo culture and Anglo-American law Forensic linguistics 10 (1) 1-22’ (no date).

7/8 09/27/21 Forensic Linguistics (ELA020X245A/S) | University of Roehampton

Wright, D. (2013) ‘Stylistic variation within genre conventions in the Enron email corpus: developing a textsensitive methodology for authorship research’, International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 20(1). doi: 10.1558/ijsll.v20i1.45.

8/8