nd Local Development Framework

SUBMISSION DOCUMENT CORE EVIDENCE BASE Public Transport Capacity Assessment

Improving the quality of life for everyone living and working in the Borough

November 2006

2006 - 2007 Early Intervention (Children at Risk) 2003 - 2006 Winner of 4 previous Beacon Awards

Tower Hamlets Local Development Framework Public Transport Capacity Assessment Job Number 021188

June 2006

Revision 01

This report has been prepared for the sole benefit, use and information of EDAW for the purposes set out in the report or instructions commissioning it. The liability of Buro Happold Limited in respect of the information contained in the report will not extend to any third party.

author jfox/ rbiggin signature

date 16.06.06 approved sfarthing signature

date 16.06.06

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 011 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Contents

1 Public Transport Study 1

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 Methodology 3

1.3 Base Assumptions 4

2 Development Areas 6

2.1 Introduction 6

2.2 Proposed land-uses 6

2.3 Trips generated by development 6

3 Borough-wide public transport analysis 8

3.1 Introduction 8

3.2 Existing public transport 8

3.3 Development accessibility (PTAL analysis) 9

3.4 Existing public transport usage 11

3.5 Proposed upgrades 13

3.6 Capacity testing of future year scenarios 15

4 Summary & Conclusion 27

Appendices

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

List of Figures

Figure 1 – The Four AAP areas in Tower Hamlets

Figure 2 – Proposed Developmental PTAL Values

Figure 3 – Shows the Development Areas within the Tower Hamlets with a PTAL value < 4

Figure 4 – Line Crowding 2010

Figure 5 – Line Crowding 2015

Figure 6 – Line Crowding 2020 (Without )

Figure 7 – Line Crowding 2020 (With Crossrail)

Figure 8 – LUL Station Entry/Exit numbers for Low Density Residential

Figure 9 – LUL Station Entry/Exit numbers for High Density Residential

Figure 10 – Bus Capability usage for High Density Residential

Figure 11 - Bus Capability usage for Low Density Residential

List of Tables

Table 1 – GFAs for borough-wide phased development

Table 2 – Extract from trip generation spreadsheet, showing an example of the walking distances to nearest public transport station

Table 3 – In descending order the highest trip generating developments

Table 4 – Proposed upgrades and implementation dates

Table 5 – Capacity and crowding relief due to Crossrail

Table 6 – LUL station entry and exit changes by year scenario

Table 7 – Bus capacity utilisation

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 1 Public Transport Study

1.1 Introduction

This report has been prepared by Buro Happold to inform the preparation of Local Development Framework, specifically the Area Action Plans (AAPs) for the Borough of Tower Hamlets.

A transport baseline report was produced by Buro Happold in spring 2005. This provided an initial analysis of the constraints and opportunities of the transport infrastructure within the Borough.

This report takes the process further by considering the likely trip generation and overall accessibility of the AAP areas. The Borough is divided into four AAP areas, these are:

ƒ Leaside

ƒ City Fringe;

ƒ ; and

ƒ Central.

The location of the four AAP areas within Tower Hamlets is shown on Figure 1.

For the purposes of this study non-public transport trips and in particular car trips have been excluded. It is assumed car use generated by the new developments in the AAP areas would be accommodated within the network. This is based on the assumption that the highway network is already congested and people wishing to drive would either put up with the prevailing conditions or change their travel behaviour.

The four AAPs provide guidelines up to 2020 for the future release of development within the Borough. This report reviews the transport implications for three future year scenarios:

ƒ Developments proposed between 2006 and 2010

ƒ Developments proposed between 2011 and 2015

ƒ Developments proposed between 2016 and 2020.

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 1 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Figure 1 – The Four AAP areas in Tower Hamlets

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 2 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 1.2 Methodology

The aim of this report is to establish an understanding of the quantity/quantum of development that could be introduced within the Borough; and the resulting impact this would have on the surrounding transport infrastructure. The delivery of development will occur over a prolonged timeframe so upgrades to the transport infrastructure over this period have been identified and taken into consideration.

The transport study has been based on the quantity and type development forecast by EDAW. The assessment is qualitative rather than quantitative in transport modelling terms. It is advisable for Tower Hamlets to undertake a robust quantitative assessment of a transport model to evaluate the impact of London wide developments on the transport infrastructure serving the Borough. The qualitative approach adopted provides a robust assessment. It will enable development phasing problems and potential shortfalls in transport infrastructure to be flagged up for each of the AAP areas.

A travel demand assessment has been undertaken to identify any shortfalls in infrastructure. The broad principles behind this methodology are to forecast the number of trips that the development proposals will generate and assign these to the transport network. The effect of these additional trips is then expressed in terms of capacity thus allowing any shortfalls to be assessed.

1.2.1 Travel Demand Analysis

The travel demand analysis entails estimating supply and demand.

The requirements for estimating demand are to:

ƒ develop peak hour trip rates for each land-use (residential, commercial, industrial, retail/leisure, community), using data from other London developments;

ƒ estimate modal splits using data from previous reports and data obtained from a GIS spatial analysis of the developments proximity to public transport nodes;

ƒ calculate the number of trips generated by each site based upon the Gross Floor Area (GFA) and then apply the modal split to produce the number of person trips generated by each development per mode of transport; and

ƒ assign the direction of travel to the development trips generated using data from previous reports, and from the National 2001 census data.

The requirements for estimating supply are to:

ƒ Collate line loading data and estimate the existing capacity/residual capacity for each corridor/line of transport.

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 3 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

The travel demand assessment was undertaken using a spreadsheet model. The spreadsheet and all of the key assumptions are shown in Appendix A. The key inputs to this were:

ƒ the development area schedule, arranged by AAP, land-use and development delivery year;

ƒ the spatial assessment of each development’s proximity to public transport nodes;

ƒ peak hour trip rates for each of the aforementioned land-uses; and

ƒ direction of travel and modal split.

The main outputs are the number of person trips made by direction and by mode for each development area.

The following should be noted and taken into consideration when reviewing the results of the travel demand work:

ƒ It has not been possible to identify the quantum and type of existing development contained on each of the sites identified for development. Ideally, existing trips would be factored into the travel demand thus allowing the net increase in trips to be estimated. Consequently the travel demand forecast will tend to overestimate the actual increase in trips. However, it is possible that some of these sites are brownfield or maybe occupied by an industrial land-use. This type of land-use generates a relatively low number of person trips during peak hours hence will have a negligible effect on the outcome of this exercise

ƒ Existing patronage levels on public transport services have been adjusted for future scenarios in-line with current forecasts. One of the most significant factors that affect these forecasts is the delivery on new future development. There is hence an element of double –counting inherent in this process

ƒ The trips generated during construction have not been considered in the travel demand analysis

ƒ Supply data has been taken from existing sources of information and published reports. No new data collection has been undertaken

ƒ The travel demand model represents a simplified approach and calculates ‘external’ trips. It does not account for internal/linked trips that may occur within mixed-use developments e.g. someone who may live and work within a single development. In addition the model does not account for complex trips which could involve a number of different changes between lines and/ or modes.

1.3 Base Assumptions

The following base assumptions have been made in undertaking the analysis described in the previous section:

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 4 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 ƒ The AM peak hour represents the worst case in terms of the number of people moving around and available transport capacity on the network in the Borough and beyond. As a result this report deals only with AM peak hour trips

ƒ Bus services in London have been significantly improved in recent years. It is assumed that the bus network will respond to additional demand through service capacity enhancements. This report makes reference to the percentage of total bus capacity that development sites identified in the AAPs will require. Where possible, enhancements to bus services that maybe required have been identified

ƒ It is assumed all developments will be accompanied by a travel plan setting out ways in which non car modes can be promoted. This should also set out the public transport opportunities available

ƒ It is assumed each development will make a contribution towards transport and access improvements. This could be ring-fenced to fund station upgrades, strategic pedestrian and cycle routes, new bus services, bus stop infrastructure etc

ƒ New and proposed developments outside of the Tower Hamlets Borough boundary have not directly been accounted for. To overcome this, growth factors for usage of each of the public transport modes have been calculated and included in our analysis. The growth factors take account of rising future demand, for example, the increased patronage on the DLR associated with the Royal Docks development and on the Jubilee and Central lines associated with the Stratford City development

ƒ The extra trips generated by the predicted windfall housing within the Borough have been excluded from the travel demand analysis as no information was available as to the locations of these developments. However sensitivity tests to compare the Borough-wide public transport network with and without the windfall housing has been carried out, the results of this analysis can be found in Appendix G. The additional windfall housing translates to an increase of between 135,000 and 165,000 s qm of residential GFA. The additional trips generated by this increase have a negligible impact upon the Borough-wide capacity assessment

ƒ It is assumed that Crossrail will be implemented by 2016.

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 5 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

2 Development Areas

2.1 Introduction

This section of the report:

ƒ discusses the proposed development land-uses by AAP area and by development phasing; and

ƒ reviews the methodology and results of the trips generated by the proposed developments.

2.2 Proposed land-uses

The aforementioned travel demand analysis has been based upon the quantum and type of land-use proposed. Detailed predictions of future development have been generated by EDAW outlining the amount of development proposed between 2006 and 2020 in each of the four AAP areas. This has been undertaken for scenarios which consider high and low residential density options.

In order to clarify the base data used for the travel demand assessment the proposed land-use schedule for each AAP area is shown in Appendix A. In summary, Table 1 below highlights the total land-use GFAs for each of the development years, for both the high and low residential density options.

Table 1 – GFAs for Borough-wide phased development

Phase 1 (2006-2010) Phase 2 (2011-2015) Phase 3 (2016-2020) Total (2006-2020) Land-use Low High Low High Low High Low High Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (GFA in m )(GFA in m)(GFA in m)(GFA in m)(GFA in m)(GFA in m)(GFA in m)(GFA in m)

Industrial 25,770 25,770 342,967 342,967 946 946 369,682 369,682 Commercial 498,727 498,727 621,208 621,208 573,320 573,320 1,693,255 1,693,255 Retail/Leisure 101,564 101,564 73,713 73,713 27,237 27,237 202,513 202,513 Community 42,368 42,368 53,875 53,875 11,414 11,414 107,658 107,658 Residential 889,573 1,011,191 1,069,446 1,257,567 261,553 305,691 2,220,572 2,574,449 Total 1,558,002 1,679,621 2,161,208 2,349,329 874,470 918,607 4,593,680 4,947,557 GFA Values not including Windfall Housing

2.3 Trips generated by development

The trips generated by each development have been calculated using trip rate, modal split and directional split data.

A GIS spatial model of Tower Hamlets was used to refine the AAP area wide modal splits and generate site specific estimates. This has been determined based upon the availability and proximity of public transport at each site and the directions of travel provided for. The table below illustrates how, rail services accessible from stations within a 940 metre walk catchment of each site were considered by this exercise.

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 6 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Table 2 – Extract from trip generation spreadsheet, showing an example of the walking distances to nearest public transport station

Distance to PT station

Rail LUL DLR Distance Distance Distance Site ID Site Name / Address Station Station Station (m) (m) (m) CF12.B Aldgate Gyratory mixed Fenchirch Street 470 Aldgate East 11 Tower Gateway 436 ID7 Skylines Harbour 2341 503 Cross Harbour 299 CF12.A Goodmans Fields Fenchirch Street 635 Aldgate East 184 Tower Gateway 370 ID32 Columbus House Limehouse 1186 Canary Wharf 604 Westferry 139 LS3 Central Fish Island Hackney Wick 208 Bow Road 1162 Bow Church 1109 CF4 Nicholson Clarke - Fleur de Lis Street Liverpool Street 256 Aldgate East 752 Tower Gateway 1258 119 Sites between Brodlove Lane / The Highway / CLimehouse 191 644 Limehouse 223 ID47 Harbour Exchange Square Limehouse 2201 Canary Wharf 392 South Quay 226 CF9 Street Rodwell House Liverpool Street 229 Aldgate East 368 Tower Gateway 839 ID12 Heron Quays Limehouse 1450 Canary Wharf 312 Heron Quays 73

Table 3 provides a snapshot of the proposed developments ranked in descending order, which generate the highest number of person trips. A complete set of trip generation results ranked in descending order for the High Density residential option are available in Appendix B.

Table 3 – In descending order the highest trip generating developments

(high residential option – includes PT and Non PT trips)

Site Area Date of Person trips Site ID Site Name / Address Build Out Sq.m ha. In Out Total ID1 North Quay 21,214 2.12 2016-2020 7,072 1,758 8,831 ID2 Billingsgate Market 57,181 5.72 2016-2020 2,816 917 3,734 ID5 Wood Wharf 72,666 7.27 2011-2015 2,353 1,070 3,423 ID38 Canary 19,867 1.99 2006-2010 2,356 792 3,148 IDN12 10 & 20 Churchill Place 4,528 0.45 2006-2010 1,493 372 1,865 LS12 Empson Street / St Andrews Way 100,717 10.07 2011-2015 1,798 31 1,829 CF21 News International 71,593 7.16 2011-2015 1,003 800 1,803 LS4 South Fish Island 135,843 13.58 2011-2015 1,637 28 1,665 IDN10 15 Canada Square 7,222 0.72 2006-2010 978 238 1,217 ID11 London Arena 24,992 2.50 2011-2015 670 485 1,155 CF9 Brushfield Street Wool Exchange 9,743 0.97 2011-2015 906 224 1,130

A full set of trip generation results, sorted by AAP area and mode of transport are available in Appendix B.

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 7 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

3 Borough-wide public transport analysis

3.1 Introduction

This section of the report:

ƒ highlights the existing public transport modes and services that serve the Borough;

ƒ provides an analysis on the public transport accessibility level (PTAL) for the proposed development areas, with the intention of identifying the development areas that are not well served by public transport;

ƒ reviews the existing loading and residual capacity for each public transport mode and identifies the possible capacity shortfalls;

ƒ identifies proposed major public transport network upgrades between 2006 and 2020 and the additional capacity these will provide; and

ƒ provides a capacity analysis for each of the development year scenarios on a mode by mode, line by line basis and flags up problem areas for discussion.

3.2 Existing public transport

The Borough is currently served by the , (DLR), overland rail and . A figure highlighting the development areas in the context of the rail services and stations within the Borough is shown in Appendix C. A figure showing bus routes can also be found in Appendix C.

The London Underground services that operate within the Borough include the District, East London, Hammersmith & City, Central and Jubilee lines. The majority of these lines operate along an east-west axis, apart from the East London line which operates along a north-south axis.

The DLR services that operate within the Borough include the east-west, Canning Town-Bank branches; and the north-south, Stratford-Lewisham branches.

The overland rail services, One Railway and operate out of and Fenchurch Street station respectively. One Railway serves the east of and C2C serves the area east of London. The Silverlink Country & Metro line clips the north-eastern corner of the Borough and the only station within the Borough served by this line is Hackney Wick.

London buses operating throughout the Borough are fairly comprehensive and the key corridors into/out of the City operate along Road, Commercial Road and Roman Road.

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 8 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 River Services utilising the operate on two routes, to/from Woolwich and Central London. Within the Borough the service stops at the and the Masthouse Terrace Pier and operates with a peak hour capacity of approximately 400 passengers.

In general, the majority of public transport corridors that serve the Borough operate along the east-west axis; this excludes some DLR and Bus services. The central termini of Liverpool Street and Fenchurch Street are located on the western fringe of the Borough. On the eastern fringes outside of the Borough are the key transport nodes of Stratford and Canning Town.

3.3 Development accessibility (PTAL analysis)

The public transport accessibility level (PTAL) methodology has been adopted by and the Authority as a means of comparing site accessibility by public transport. Using the methodology the accessibility of a site is valued by taking account of the time taken to access the public transport network, including walk time to the various services, the average waiting time and frequency of service and the reliability of each service.

LBTH have provided PTAL values for each of the development sites in the four AAP areas. These are available in Appendix D. The calculated PTAL values for each development site have been interrogated for the existing provision of public transport. The results have been split into the following categories:

PTAL Low 1a - 2 Medium 3 - 4 High 5 - 6

A statistical review of the PTAL values reveals that 11% of the proposed developments have a ‘low’ PTAL value, 15% have a ‘medium’ PTAL value and the remaining 64% have a ‘high’ PTAL value. Figure 2 below summarises the PTAL values (note each development with the same value has been grouped to provide a Borough-wide breakdown).

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 9 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Figure 2 – Proposed development PTAL values

Proposed Developments PTAL values

1a 1b 0% 2% 2 1a 9% 6b 3 1b Number of 30% 12% 2 PTAL Value Sites 3 1a 0 4 4 1b 3 13% 216 5 322 6a 6a 14% 5 424 20% 6b 538 6a 26 6b 58

In general, the vast majority of sites are well served by public transport. The London Plan (2004) does not provide guidance to major development being linked to defined PTAL scores, however, the Draft Further Alterations to the London Plan state that major new development should be located in areas with high public transport accessibility (interpreted as PTAL scores of 4 to 6). The PTAL results indicate that 23% of the proposed developments would rank below the recommended value, based upon existing public transport provision. Figure 3, below, identifies the sites that fall below this criteria and into the ‘1, 2 or 3’ PTAL value bracket. In summary for each of the AAP areas is provided below:

ƒ Leaside APP - the area immediately to the south of Hackney Wick station; the area to the east between Devons Road and All Saints DLR stations; and the area to the south of Canning Town are all areas with low accessibility. From a development point of view these areas are less likely to be supported for major developments based on the existing PTAL value

ƒ City Fringe AAP - all of the development sites have acceptable PTAL values

ƒ Isle of Dogs APP - the area to the west of Cross Harbour, Mudchute and DLR stations are areas with low accessibility

ƒ Central AAP - the area east of Cambridge North and north of Mile End are areas with low accessibility.

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 10 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Figure 3 – Shows the Development Areas within the Tower Hamlets with a PTAL value < 4

3.4 Existing public transport usage

Two methods of assessing the effect of future development on the public transport network have been developed. The first of these has been applied to London Underground and DLR services for which comprehensive patronage data is available. This allows reliable estimates of existing passenger loadings to be made. The second approach has been applied to modes where patronage data is not available i.e. overground rail and bus services. In the case of overground rail services, passenger data is commercially sensitive and is hence very difficult to obtain from operators. In contrast to this, London Buses hold very detailed information on bus loadings. It has not been possible within the scope of this study to undertake the considerable analysis required to determine bus service ridership levels within the Borough. The approach taken to assess the effect on rail and bus services has therefore been to relate demand to total line capacity.

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 11 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Underground services have been assessed on the basis of maximum observed crush capacity. This provides a more realistic estimate of the number passengers that may be accommodated than the planning standard capacity. To simplify the interpretation of crowding levels on Underground and DLR services the concept of a volume to capacity ratio (VCR) has been adopted. The VCR levels that have been adopted are as follows:

ƒ 0.5 – 0.65 represents moderate crowding (and provides the benchmark for the planning capacity standard);

ƒ 0.65 – 1.0 represents high levels of crowding; and

ƒ > 1.0 represents very high levels of crowding.

A full set of results for the existing capacity are available for review in Appendix E. A summary of the results on a mode by mode basis are described below.

In addition to analysing line capacity, capacities of London Underground Ltd. (LUL) stations within the Borough have also been reviewed. The commentary for this exercise is located within chapter 3.6.2 of this report.

3.4.1 LUL

The existing capacity on LUL lines within the Borough is generally adequate, with the majority of lines running at low to moderate crowding, so below the planning standard requirement. The exceptions to this are on the Central and District line westbound services, where some sections of the lines are experiencing high levels of crowding between Mile End and Bank.

Forecast future passenger growth for LUL has been assumed at 0.48% per annum, this equates to a 7% increase in the AM peak hour between 2006 and 2020 (sourced from LUL strategic planning department).

3.4.2 Rail

The two rail services operating within the Borough and beyond are already running at high to very high levels of crowding compared to their available capacity. However, unlike on the LUL analysis this capacity is calculated relative to the number of seats on a service, rather than a crush capacity, so extra capacity should still be available for standing passengers.

Forecast future passenger growth for Rail has been assumed at 0.48% per annum, this equates to a 7% increase in the AM peak hour between 2006 and 2020.

3.4.3 DLR

The DLR is currently running within capacity, with almost no services experiencing even moderate levels of crowding. With line extensions and extra services scheduled in the near future, growth forecasts for its use are high (45% in the next 4 years); however, it is thought a large proportion of this increase will occur outside of the peak hours.

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 12 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Forecast future passenger growth for DLR has been assumed at 0.7% per annum, this equates to a 10% increase in the AM peak hour between 2006 and 2020 (Sourced from TfL).

3.4.4 London Bus

Bus provision in Tower Hamlets is comprehensive. Within the scope of this study it has not been possible to establish existing patterns of usage for each of the bus routes that serve the Borough.

Forecast future passenger growth for London Bus use has been assumed at 1% per annum, this equates to a 21% increase in the AM peak hour between 2006 and 2020 (Sourced London Travel Report 2004).

3.5 Proposed upgrades

Between 2006 and 2020, a number of significant public transport infrastructure projects are planned, which will improve public transport corridors within Tower Hamlets. Table 5 below summarises these and their likely implementation dates. All of the improvements have been factored into the travel demand analysis for the future year scenarios of 2010, 2015 and 2020. The key headlines from the table identify that by 2011 significant capacity enhancements will have occurred to LUL and DLR services. The largest contribution will be the introduction of the Crossrail project, estimated for implementation by 2016.

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 13 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Table 4 – Proposed upgrades and Implementation dates

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Notes

LUL 1 1 - Increased peak hour east bound service to 27tph Central Line 2 2 - Increased peak hour east bound services to 28tph Stratford 3 3 - Stratford International station opens Mile end Liverpool street 4 4 - Station modernisation and refurbishment 5 5 - Capacity increased from 6 to 7 car trains Jubilee Line 6 6 - Increased peak hour service 30tph 7 7 - Capacity increased by 45% West ham 8 8 - Station upgrade Cannig town 8 North greenwich 8 Canary wharf 8 Canada water 8 9 9 - Increased peak hour services, east bound District Line 10 10 - Improved signaling 11 11 - Increased peak hour services, east bound Bromley by bow Bow road Stepney green Aldgate East 12 12 - Probable increased peak hour services Ham & City Line 13 13 - Improved signaling Tower hill Bank and Monument 14 14 - Increased peak hour service 12tph East london 15 15 - Increased peak hour service 16tph Shoreditch Shadwell

DLR 16 16 - Bank - Lewisham capacity increase 2 - 3 car trains North - South 17 17 - 3 car trains (increased capacity by 50%) Stratford Pudding mill lane Devons road All saints Poplar West india key Heron quays - Island gardens Cutty sark East - West 16 East India Blackwall Westferry Limehouse Tower gateway

Overland rail

One' Cambridge heath Bethnal green Liverpool street

C2C West ham Limehouse Fenchurch street

Bus 17 17 - Opening of the Crossrail line, provides a Crossrail line capacity of 36,000

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 14 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Crossrail will see the introduction of an east-west rail line through the centre of London with new stations at Stratford, Paddington, Bond Street, Tottenham Court Road, Farringdon, Liverpool Street, Whitechapel and Isle of Dogs (Canary Wharf). The scheme will have a line capacity of 36,000 people per hour through Central London during peak periods and will release capacity on the LUL, DLR and National Rail networks. It is estimated (from the Crossrail Business Case Summary, September 2003) that some 19,200 passengers will travel North-westbound on the Isle of Dogs/North Kent line and some 35,000 passengers will travel south- westbound from the Stratford line in the AM peak period (0700-1000). This equates to approximately 9,600 and 17,500 passengers travelling east and westbound respectively in the AM peak hour (0800-0900). As discussed in more detail later in the report, it is assumed that the majority transfer from the aforementioned LUL, DLR and NRN lines as illustrated below in Table 6.

3.6 Capacity testing of future year scenarios

The viability of delivering proposed developments over the 2006 – 2020 timeframe has been tested. This has taken account of planned public transport upgrades and growth in existing passenger numbers as described earlier. The key steps in the process are:

ƒ load the trip generation results onto the future year (2010, 2015 and 2020) baseline data;

ƒ provide clear assessment criteria, such that the key areas of crowding have been identified as those where the volume to capacity ratio (VCR) of:

0.5 – 0.65 represents moderate crowding (and provides the benchmark for the planning capacity standard)

0.65 – 1.0 represents high levels of crowding

> 1.0 represents very high levels of crowding;

ƒ display the VCR results on Borough-wide schematic plans for each scenario year, for the low and high residential density options. This will aid in identifying shortfalls in residual capacity across the network; Where this has not been possible generated trips have been expressed as a percentage of total capacity;

ƒ a review of the effect future developments will have on existing LUL stations. This will identify the shortfalls in station capacity and provide an indication of which stations may require capacity enhancements;

ƒ a review of the effect that future developments will have on the bus network across the Borough.

3.6.1 LUL, Rail and DLR – Line Capacity

Upon reviewing the results of the travel demand assessment, the difference in terms of impact upon line capacities between the high and low residential density scenarios is negligible. The following commentary is

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 15 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

therefore applicable to both the high and low residential density scenarios. To identify where crowding levels have changed from the previous development scenario years, the results have been displayed in Italics.

2006-2010

Figure 4 – Line Crowding 2010

The following can be seen from the above Figure 4, of which a larger version is available in Appendix F:

ƒ Between 2006 and 2010 crowding levels drop by 15% on the Jubilee line westbound, between London Bridge and Southwark as a result of line upgrades (from moderate to insignificant crowding)

ƒ Moderate crowding (equal to the planning standard) occurs on westbound services for the District line between West Ham and Monument (a 5% increase in crowding from the 2006 base year on all sections of the line); westbound on the Central line between Stratford and Mile End; westbound on the Hammersmith

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 16 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 and City Line between Aldgate East and Liverpool Street; and southbound on the DLR between Bow Church and West India Key (an 18% rise in crowding from the 2006 base year)

ƒ High crowding above 65% of total capacity occurs on westbound Central line services between Mile End and Bank; westbound on the Hammersmith and City line between Liverpool Street and Moorgate, rising from moderate crowding in the 2006 base year. Westbound on ‘One’ Railway between Stratford and Liverpool Street, and on the northbound DLR service from West India Key to All Saints, (a 26% increase in crowding) from West India Key to Poplar

ƒ Very high crowding (where demand exceeds capacity) occurs on the west and eastbound C2C Rail service from West-ham to Fenchurch Street.

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 17 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

2011-2015

Figure 5 – Line Crowding 2015

The following can be seen from the above Figure 5, of which a larger version is available in Appendix F:

ƒ Moderate crowding (equal to the planning standard) occurs on westbound services for the District line between West Ham and Monument, on the Central line between Stratford and Mile End; westbound on the Hammersmith and City line between Aldgate East and Liverpool Street; southbound on the DLR between Devons Road and All Saints; northbound on the DLR from Canary Wharf to West India Key; eastbound on the DLR service from Bank and Tower Gateway to Shadwell; and westbound on the DLR from East India to Poplar

ƒ High crowding above 65% of total capacity occurs on the westbound services for the Central line between Mile End and Bank; westbound on the Ham and City line between Liverpool Street and Moorgate; westbound on ‘One’ Railway between Stratford and Liverpool Street; northbound on the DLR from West India Key to West ferry (a 30% increase in crowding) and Devons Road, southbound on the DLR service

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 18 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 from Stratford to Devons Road( a 30% increase in crowding) and All saints to Poplar, and eastbound on the DLR from Westferry to All Saints

ƒ Very high crowding (where demand exceeds capacity) occurs on the west and eastbound C2C Rail service from West-ham to Fenchurch Street; and eastbound on the DLR between West India Quays and Poplar (a 40% increase in crowding).

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 19 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

2016-2020 (Without Crossrail)

Figure 6 – Line Crowding 2020 (Without Crossrail)

The following can be seen from the above Figure 6, of which a larger version is available in Appendix F:

ƒ Moderate crowding (equal to the planning standard) occurs on the westbound services for the District line between West Ham and Monument; on the Central line between Stratford and Mile End; westbound on the Ham and City line between Aldgate East and Liverpool Street; eastbound on the Jubilee Line from London Bridge to Canary Wharf (a 10% increase in crowding); northbound on the DLR service between Cross Harbour and West India Quay and from Bow Church to Stratford; eastbound on the DLR service from Bank to West India Quay and from Poplar to Blackwalll; and westbound on the DLR from Shadwell to Tower Gateway

ƒ High crowding above 65% of total capacity occurs on the westbound services for the Central line between Mile End and Bank, on One Railway between Stratford and Liverpool Street; on the northbound DLR service from All Saints to Bow Church; and westbound on the DLR from Canning Town to Canary Wharf

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 20 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 ƒ Very high crowding (where demand exceeds capacity) occurs on the west and eastbound C2C Rail service from West-ham to Fenchurch Street; northbound on the DLR between West India Key and Poplar (a 20% increase in crowding); and southbound on the DLR between Stratford and West India Key (a 60% increase in crowding).

2016-2020 (With Crossrail)

Figure 7 – Line Crowding 2020 (With Crossrail)

Figure 6 and 7 (of which larger versions are available in Appendix F) and Table 6 below, compare the 2020 development year scenario with and without Crossrail. They highlight the capacity relief the implementation of Crossrail in 2016 will bring to the LUL and Rail services operating within Tower Hamlets. It is estimated (from the Crossrail Business Case Summary, September 2003) that the following key reductions on the following lines will occur due to Crossrail:

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 21 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

ƒ 9% or 2200 westbound passenger trips on the Central line;

ƒ 8% or 500 westbound passenger trips on the Hammersmith and City line; and

ƒ 35% or 5,000 westbound passenger trips on the C2C Railway line.

In summary Crossrail will reduce crowding levels by 7% on the Central line, however, high levels of crowding will still exist; by 6% on the Hammersmith and City line, however, high levels of crowding still exist; and by 53% on the C2C Railway line, reducing crowding from very high levels to high levels. The Crossrail scheme will also lead to improved accessibility at several LUL and overland rail stations, most notably Liverpool Street and Whitechapel.

Table 5 – Capacity and Crowding relief due to Crossrail

Without Crossrail With Crossrail

AM Peak hour AM Peak hour Crush capacity % Capacity used Crush capacity % Capacity used Passenger Loadings Passenger Loadings

Westbound LUL Central Line 31,410 24,140 77% 31,410 21,968 70% Jubilee Line 28,840 13,294 46% 28,840 12,497 43% District Line 21,230 13,131 62% 21,230 12,605 59% Ham & City Line 7,008 5,284 75% 7,008 4,861 69% DLR DLR 16,092 7,452 46% 16,092 6,856 43% Overland Rail 'One' Railway 5,550 5,668 102% 5,550 5,101 92% C2C 8,960 13,575 152% 8,960 8,823 98% Crossrail Crossrail - - 36,000 25,200 70% Total 119,090 82,543 69% 155,090 97,911 63% Eastbound LUL Central Line 29,316 7,585 26% 29,316 6,903 24% Jubilee Line 28,840 16,025 56% 28,840 15,063 52% District Line 21,230 5,896 28% 21,230 5,661 27% Ham & City Line 7,008 3,815 54% 7,008 3,510 50% DLR DLR 16,092 8,388 52% 16,092 7,717 48% Overland Rail 'One' Railway 7,400 1,849 25% 7,400 1,664 22% C2C 2,800 519 19% 2,800 337 12% Crossrail Crossrail - 36,000 6,750 19% Total 112,686 44,078 39% 148,686 47,605 32% Northbound LUL East london 8,912 2,577 29% 8,912 2,628 29% DLR DLR 13,770 8,478 62% 13,770 7,799 57% Total 22,682 11,054 49% 22,682 10,428 46% Southbound LUL East london 8,912 720 8% 8,912 735 8% DLR DLR 13,770 9,748 71% 13,770 8,968 65% Total 22,682 10,468 46% 22,682 9,703 43% All Directions Total 277,140 148,144 53% 349,140 165,646 47%

3.6.2 LUL - Station Capacity

The following table and charts highlight the access and egress flows for LUL stations. It has not been possible to ascertain if each of the stations are able to cater for the additional demands, as station capacity is determined

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 22 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 by a wide range of factors; gates, platform spaces; vertical and horizontal circulation estimates etc. Increases in demand have therefore been expressed as a percentage increase on existing use. Such an approach shows that the most significant changes will be at Bromley-by-Bow, Aldgate East and Canary Wharf where usage is forecast to increase by 64%, 38% and 39% respectively by 2015. This increase is largely associated with developments within a 940 metre walking radius of each station. It should be noted that each station may currently operate below capacity so any increase in usage may not require station upgrades to cope. Table 7 below shows the change in underground station usage for each scenario.

Table 6 – LUL station Entry and Exit changes by year scenario CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT TRIPS Option Low Res High Res Low Res High Res Low Res High Res Year 2010 2010 2015 2015 2020 2020

Additional Additional Additional Additional Additional Additional Entry Exit trips (%) trips (%) trips (%) trips (%) trips (%) trips (%) weekday weekday Station A.M. peak: A.M. peak Aldgate East 1419 4416 13% 14% 37% 38% 37% 38% Bethnal Green 5097 2969 2% 2% 12% 12% 12% 12% Bow Road 2216 919 1% 1% 18% 19% 23% 24% Bromley-by-Bow 994 1013 15% 17% 61% 64% 61% 64% Canary Wharf 5055 29921 12% 12% 22% 22% 39% 39% Canning Town 3668 1261 3% 4% 11% 12% 11% 12% Mile End 4272 2961 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% Shadwell 568 772 12% 13% 16% 17% 16% 17% Stepney Green 1439 1195 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Stratford 8507 4429 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% Tower Hill 8316 8791 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Wapping 308 119 12% 13% 12% 13% 12% 13% Whitechapel 1112 1832 0% 0% 17% 19% 17% 19%

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 23 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Figure 8 – LUL station Entry/Exit numbers for Low Density residential

LUL Station Entry/Exits AM Peak (Low Residential)

60000 yr 2020 50000 yr 2015 yr 2010 40000 Existing s n o

s 30000 r Pe 20000

10000

0 l t d w n ll d ill e s en a o rf d e r ng p e ha ow w een fo i Ea r -B T En r t r H p ha le ad G a e c te l G w Ro by y W g i r w ap e a - r in M St it ga n o y a n Sh To W h d th B le n ney Al e an a W C C tep B rom S B Station

Figure 9 – LUL station Entry/Exit numbers for High Density residential

LUL Station Entry/Exits AM Peak (High Residential) 60000 2020 50000 2015 2010 40000 Existing s n o

s 30000 r Pe 20000

10000

0 l t n d rf n d ll il el s e ow a w n e rd ng e oa h o w een fo H Ea -B r t r pi hap e Gr R y G e p b y W ile E had ra w a ec - ng T M St t ow S To W hi dgat thnal B ley Al e anar anni W C C tepney B om S Br Station

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 24 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 3.6.3 London Buses - Capacity

The effect of future development on the bus network across the Borough has been reviewed. Within the scope of this study it has not been possible to establish existing patterns on usage for each of the bus routes that serve the Borough. In order to develop an indication of the level of impact that future development will have on the bus network, future demand has been calculated as a percentage of existing service capacity. The table below shows the proportion of current service capacity that will be required for each development scenario considered by this work. For example, it is forecast that 4% of northbound bus capacity within the Isle of Dogs area will be required to accommodate trips resulting form the 2010 low residential scenario. The need and level of bus improvements required will therefore be dependant on baseline demand and whether the combination of these exceeds the capacity of individual services.

Table 8 below highlights instances where demand is forecast to account for 15% or more of current service capacity. The main examples of this occur within the Isle of Dogs on eastbound, southbound and westbound services and Leaside on northbound, southbound and eastbound services. Demand is forecast to account for 100% or more of current service capacity, for the 2020 scenario westbound route from the Isle of Dogs. This route during peak periods does not exist; however, this route requirement could possibly be mitigated by the extending of the N15 night service to a 24hr benchmark service, running westbound between Canary wharf and Liverpool Street.

Table 7 – Bus capacity utilisation

Area Direction Route No's operated Hourly capacity Hourly Capacity (uplifted figures) Additional trips (Low Res) Additional trips (High Res)

2006 2010 2015 2020 2010 Additional Trips 2015 Additional Trips 2020 Additional Trips 2010 Additional Trips 2015 Additional Trips 2020 Additional Trips North 26 48 55 67 106 254 388 4860 5152 5516 5881 55 1% 90 3% - 2% 60 1% 97 3% - 3% East 8 15 25 100 115 4785 5072 5431 5790 102 2% 168 5% - 5% 113 2% 183 5% - 5% City fringe South 42 78 RV1 1170 1240 1328 1416 37 3% 60 7% - 7% 43 3% 68 8% - 8% West 8 25 26 205 3885 4118 4409 4701 318 8% 521 19% - 18% 349 8% 565 21% - 19% Total 14700 15582 16685 17787 511 3% 838 8% - 8% 565 4% 912 9% - 8% North D6 D7 D8 108 277 2235 2369 2537 2704 80 3% 176 10% 13 10% 82 3% 178 10% 13 10% East 108 360 382 409 436 49 13% 124 42% 8 42% 50 13% 125 43% 8 42% Isle of Dogs South 108 360 382 409 436 55 14% 133 46% 9 45% 55 15% 134 46% 9 46% West D3 360 382 409 436 128 33% 284 101% 21 99% 130 34% 289 103% 21 101% Total 3315 3514 3763 4011 312 9% 717 27% 50 27% 317 9% 726 28% 51 27% North 108 D8 S2 1110 1177 1260 1343 333 28% 890 97% 1 91% 345 29% 654 79% 1 74% East 25 115 323 2685 2846 3047 3249 99 3% 228 11% 1 10% 107 4% 173 9% 1 9% Leaside South 108 D8 660 700 749 799 88 13% 172 35% 1 33% 99 14% 137 31% 1 30% West 25 115 309 323 339 3165 3355 3592 3830 324 10% 695 28% 3 27% 355 11% 538 25% 3 23% Total 7620 8077 8649 9220 844 10% 1,984 33% 5 31% 906 11% 1,503 28% 6 26% North 106 277 309 388 D6 2955 3132 3354 3576 90 3% 42 4% 3 4% 92 3% 44 4% 3 4% East 15 25 115 309 323 3660 3880 4154 4429 190 5% 89 7% 6 6% 195 5% 93 7% 6 7% Central South 339 395 D6 690 731 783 835 74 10% 37 14% 2 14% 78 11% 40 15% 2 14% West 15 25 2355 2496 2673 2850 231 9% 124 13% 5 13% 247 10% 136 14% 5 14% Total 9660 10240 10964 11689 585 6% 292 8% 16 8% 613 6% 314 8% 16 8% Total 35295 37413 40060 42707 Uplift figure 1.5 %pa 15% or greater 100% or greater

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 25 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Figure 10 - Bus capacity usage for High Density Residential

Low Residential

18000

16000

14000 e

12000

usag 2020 Additional Trips y t 10000 2015 Additional Trips paci

a 8000 2010 Additional Trips

C Hourly capacity al 6000 Tot 4000

2000

0 City fringe Isle of Dogs Leaside Central

Figure 11 - Bus capacity usage for Low Density Residential

High Residential

18000

16000

14000 e

12000

usag 2020 Additional Trips y t 10000 2015 Additional Trips paci

a 8000 2010 Additional Trips C l Hourly capacity a

t 6000 o T 4000

2000

0 City fringe Isle of Dogs Leaside Central

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 26 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 4 Summary & Conclusion

The following conclusions can be drawn from the transport study:

ƒ Based upon existing public transport provision, the PTAL results indicate that 23% of the proposed development sites would rank below the recommended PTAL value of 4 or above. These sites have been highlighted on Figure 3 within the report. In order to serve these developments and improve accessibility additional public transport provision maybe required

ƒ Existing capacity on public transport within the Borough is generally adequate, however

Moderate to High levels of crowding are experienced on the LUL Central and District line westbound services between Mile End and Bank/Tower Hill.

High to very high levels of crowding are experienced on the overland rail services One Railway and C2C

ƒ In terms of future upgrades, by 2011 significant capacity enhancements will have occurred to LUL and DLR services. Crossrail is due for implementation by 2016 and will have a line capacity of 36,000 people per hour through central London during the AM peak hour, with expected AM peak hour passenger numbers of 9,600 and 17,500 eastbound and westbound respectively. This additional capacity is expected to release capacity on the on the majority of the LUL, DLR and National Rail networks, notably to/from the west

ƒ The proposed enhancements to the LUL, DLR and National Rail networks (including Crossrail) will improve capacity and crowding problems in some areas. However, between 2006 and 2020 the additional trips generated by future development and the expected growth forecasts in passenger numbers network wide will lead to increased crowding on many of the Rail and LUL services. Key pinch points to be considered in further detail, are described below

ƒ Pinch points occur on the DLR services, southbound between Stratford and West India Key; northbound between West India Key and All Saints; and westbound between Canning Town and Popular. Of the 133 developments within the catchment area of the DLR lines, the top five trip contributors to patronage which may result in overcrowding are highlighted in the below table

Date of Person trips DLR DLR Site ID Site Name / Address Build Out In Out Total Station Distance(m ) In Out Total ID1 North Quay 2016-2020 7,072 1,758 8,831 West India Quay 29 2,687.5 429.0 3,116.5 ID2 Billingsgate Market 2016-2020 2,816 917 3,734 Poplar 20 1,070.1 223.8 1,294.0 ID5 Wood Wharf 2011-2015 2,353 1,070 3,423 South Quay 354 894.2 261.0 1,155.2 ID38 Canary Riverside 2006-2010 2,356 792 3,148 Heron Quays 288 895.2 193.3 1,088.5 IDN12 10 & 20 Churchill Place 2006-2010 1,493 372 1,865 Poplar 361 567.2 90.8 658.0

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 27 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

ƒ Pinch points occur on the C2C Railway line westbound service from West Ham to Fenchurch Street. Of the 27 developments within the catchment area of the overland ‘C2C’ line, the top five trip contributors to patronage and which may cause overcrowding are highlighted in the below table

Date of Person trips Rail Rail Site ID Site Name / Address Build Out In Out Total Station Distance(m ) In Out Total CF12.F Aldgate Gyratory mixed 2011-2015 714 178 893 Fenchirch Street 586 247.7 40.4 288.0 CF12.C Aldgate Gyratory mixed 2011-2015 550 137 687 Fenchirch Street 621 190.7 31.1 221.8 CF12.B Goodmans Fields 2011-2015 348 421 769 Fenchirch Street 470 120.7 95.3 216.0 CF12.A Middlesex Street Rodwell House 2006-2010 514 127 641 Fenchirch Street 635 178.1 28.7 206.9 CF12.D Aldgate Gyratory mixed 2011-2015 447 111 558 Fenchirch Street 634 154.9 25.2 180.1

ƒ Pinch points occur on the Central line westbound service between Mile end and Liverpool Street. All of these services experience high levels of crowding from 2015 onwards. Of the 20 developments within the catchment area of the Central line, the top five trip contributors to patronage and which may cause overcrowding are highlighted in the below table

Date of Person trips LUL LUL Site ID Site Name / Address Build Out In Out Total Station Distance(m ) In Out Total 7 Prichard Road Gas Works 2011-2015 929 16 945 Bethnal Green 710 774.9 8.1 783.0 12 Wadeson Street, Canal, Emma Street 2011-2015 552 10 562 Bethnal Green 786 460.8 5.1 465.9 42 Cambridge Heath Road, Railway, Three Colts L 2011-2015 415 154 570 Bethnal Green 117 346.5 78.6 425.0 LS2 East Fish Island 2016-2020 67 450 517 Stratford 902 55.6 230.3 286.0 37 Greenheath Business Centre 2011-2015 175 52 227 Bethnal Green 207 145.8 26.6 172.4

ƒ In terms of station capacity the most significant changes in station usage will occur at Bromley-by-Bow, Aldgate East and Canary Wharf where usage is forecast to increase by 64%, 38% and 39% respectively by 2015. It is recommended a station capacity analysis in relation to development delivery dates is undertaken for each of the stations within the Borough, to identify future shortfalls

ƒ In terms of London Bus capacity, demand forecast to account for 15% or more of current bus service capacity occurs within the Isle of Dogs AAP area on eastbound, southbound and westbound services; and within the Leaside AAP area on northbound, southbound and eastbound services. By 2020 a bus service will be required between Canary Wharf and Liverpool Street to meet demand. The N15 service could be extended to operate within peak hours to meet this demand

ƒ It is important to note future travel patterns may alter within the 2006-2020 development timeframe and initiatives such as the introduction of Green Travel Plans will aid this. Green Travel Plans are an important planning tool for future developments within the Borough and will encourage a change in travel behaviour. As an example they could be used to encourage people to travel outside the peak periods by encouraging employers to adopt flexible working patterns, thus helping to reduce peak hour patronage.

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Page 28 of 28 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

Appendices

Appendix A - Travel Demand Spreadsheet Model and Key Assumptions

Modal Splits Of Public Transport City Fringe Isle of Dogs Leaside Central Employment Residential Employment Residential Employment Residential Employment Residential Overland Rail 38 29 - - 26 25 31 27 LUL 2 9 28 49 38 26 25 27 27 DLR 19 15 41 30 26 25 22 20 Bus 8 26 3 5 17 19 12 22 Walk & Cycle 7 3 6 26 4 5 8 4 Non PT 9 22 7 19 5 21 5 22

City Fringe Employment Overland Y3 8Y 48 Y 55 Y 78 N - N - N - N - LUL Y2 9Y 36 N - N - Y 48 Y 74 N - N - DLR Y1 9N - Y 27 N - Y 32 N - Y 67 N - Bus 8 10 11 16 13 20 27 93 Walk 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Residential Overland Y2 9Y 34 Y 41 Y 52 N - N - N - N - LUL Y2 8Y 33 N - N - Y 40 Y 51 N - N - DLR Y1 5N - Y 20 N - Y 21 N - Y 35 N - Bus 26 30 36 46 37 46 62 97 Walk 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Isle of Dogs Employment Overland Y- Y - Y - Y - N - N - N - N - LUL Y4 9Y 88 N - N - Y 49 Y 88 N - N - DLR Y4 1N - Y 87 N - Y 41 N - Y 87 N - Bus 3 6 7 94 3 6 7 94 Walk 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Residential Overland Y- Y - Y - Y - N - N - N - N - LUL Y3 8Y 65 N - N - Y 38 Y 65 N - N - DLR Y3 0N - Y 63 N - Y 30 N - Y 63 N - Bus 5 9 11 74 5 9 11 74 Walk 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Leaside Employment LUL Y2 6Y 36 N - N - Y 36 Y 58 N - N - DLR Y2 6N - Y 36 N - Y 36 N - Y 58 N - Bus 17 23 23 37 23 37 37 96 Walk 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Residential Overland Y2 5Y 35 Y 35 Y 54 N - N - N - N - LUL Y2 5Y 35 N - N - Y 35 Y 54 N - N - DLR Y2 5N - Y 35 N - Y 35 N - Y 54 N - Bus 19 26 26 41 26 41 41 95 Walk 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Central Employment Overland Y3 1Y 41 Y 44 Y 67 N - N - N - N - LUL Y2 7Y 35 N - N - Y 41 Y 64 N - N - DLR Y2 2N - Y 31 N - Y 34 N - Y 60 N - Bus 12 16 17 25 18 28 32 92 Walk 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Residential Overland Y2 7Y 34 Y 38 Y 53 N - N - N - N - LUL Y2 7Y 34 N - N - Y 37 Y 52 N - N - DLR Y2 0N - Y 28 N - Y 28 N - Y 45 N - Bus 22 28 31 43 31 44 51 96 Walk 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Directional Splits City Fringe Isle of Dogs Leaside Central Employment Residential Employment Residential Employment Residential Employment Residential North 14 8 21 32 53 13 1 9 9 East 19 21 22 8 11 13 4 1 18 South 1 12 22 12 6 19 1 2 13 West 66 59 35 48 30 55 2 7 59

Trip Rates Land-Use - Office AM in - Trip rate (per 100sq m) AM out - Trip rate (per 100sq m) 1.89 0.47

Land-Use - Residential AM in - Trip rate (per 100sq m) AM out - Trip rate (per 100sq m) 0.07 0.98

Land-Use - Retail AM in - Trip rate (per 100sq m) AM out - Trip rate (per 100sq m) 0.82 0.03

Land-Use - Leisure AM in - Trip rate (per 100sq m) AM out - Trip rate (per 100sq m) 0.36 0.07

Land-Use - Hotel AM in - Trip rate (per 100sq m) AM out - Trip rate (per 100sq m) 0.14 0.30

Land-Use - Industrial AM in - Trip rate (per 100sq m) AM out - Trip rate (per 100sq m) 0.76 0.08

Land-Use - Community AM in - Trip rate (per 100sq m) AM out - Trip rate (per 100sq m) 0.05 0.00

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

Appendix B - Trip generation results for each development area sorted in descending order

Site Area Date of Person trips Site ID Site Name/Address Build Out Sq.m ha. In Out Total

ID1 North Quay 21,214 2.12 2016-2020 7,072 1,758 8,831

ID2 Billingsgate Market 57,181 5.72 2016-2020 2,816 917 3,734

ID5 Wood Wharf 72,666 7.27 2011-2015 2,353 1,070 3,423

ID38 Canary Riverside 19,867 1.99 2006-2010 2,356 792 3,148

IDN12 10 & 20 Churchill Place 4,528 0.45 2006-2010 1,493 372 1,865

LS12 Empson Street/St Andrews Way 100,717 10.07 2011-2015 1,798 31 1,829

CF21 News International 71,593 7.16 2011-2015 1,003 800 1,803

LS4 South Fish Island 135,843 13.58 2011-2015 1,637 28 1,665

IDN10 15 Canada Square 7,222 0.72 2006-2010 978 238 1,217

ID11 London Arena 24,992 2.50 2011-2015 670 485 1,155

CF9 Brushfield Street Wool Exchange 9,743 0.97 2011-2015 906 224 1,130

7 Prichard Road Gas Works 26,017 2.60 2011-2015 929 16 945

LS1 North Fish Island 124,002 12.40 2011-2015 896 15 912

CF12.F Aldgate Gyratory mixed 13,902 1.39 2011-2015 714 178 893

ID7 Skylines Harbour 14,400 1.44 2011-2015 654 210 864

CF12.B Goodmans Fields 37,196 3.72 2011-2015 348 421 769

ID32 Columbus House 3,152 0.32 2006-2010 582 143 725

LS3 Central Fish Island 98,319 9.83 2011-2015 711 12 723

CF5 Nicholson Clarke - Fleur de Lis Street 8,922 0.89 2006-2010 540 175 715

CF12.C Aldgate Gyratory mixed 10,538 1.05 2011-2015 550 137 687

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Sites between Brodlove Lane/The Highway 119 40,163 4.02 2006-2010 399 270 669 /CableStreet/Butcher Row, E1 ID47 Harbour Exchange Square 26,727 2.67 2016-2020 308 341 649

CF12.A Middlesex Street Rodwell House 5,523 0.55 2006-2010 514 127 641

ID12 Heron Quays 6,459 0.65 2011-2015 473 117 590

42 Cambridge Heath Road, Railway, Three Colts Lane, Birkbeck 16,748 1.67 2011-2015 415 154 570

12 Wadeson Street, Canal, Emma Street 16,047 1.60 2011-2015 552 10 562

CF12.D Aldgate Gyratory mixed 9,935 0.99 2011-2015 447 111 558

LS23 Orchard Place North 51,766 5.18 2011-2015 315 239 553

Land between Furze Street, Devons Road and Bow Common 128 Land, E3 66,658 6.67 2011-2015 326 204 530

LS2 East Fish Island 130,873 13.09 2016-2020 67 450 517

ID46 Marsh Wall West 22,633 2.26 2016-2020 359 152 511

ID45 Thames Quay 14,453 1.45 2011-2015 378 107 485

CF12.H Aldgate Gyratory mixed 5,758 0.58 2011-2015 370 92 462

Bow Common Gasworks, Bow Common Lane, E3 and 125 39,895 3.99 2016-2020 281 180 461 adjoining arches IDN11 5 Churchill Place 2,582 0.26 2006-2010 351 88 439

LS24 Leamouth Penninsula 42,092 4.21 2011-2015 274 156 431

LS25 Blackwall Stations/Blackwall Reach, Naval Row 19,551 1.96 2011-2015 292 122 413

CF12.G Aldgate Gyratory mixed 5,130 0.51 2011-2015 330 82 412

ID42 1 Millharbour 7,012 0.70 2006-2010 111 298 409

CF15 Mansell Street 4,879 0.49 2006-2010 313 78 392

CF2 A Bishopsgate Goodsyard 36,643 3.66 2011-2015 65 321 386

CF6 Trumans Brewery 38,137 3.81 2006-2010 342 25 367

ID48 Admirals Way 9,890 0.99 2016-2020 272 77 349

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

22-28 Marsh Wall And 2 Cuba Street and 17 to 23 Westferry ID25 9,017 0.90 2011-2015 80 258 338 Road, Marsh Wall ID13 South Quay Plaza 11,538 1.15 2011-2015 264 68 332

ID16 Reuters, 1 Paul Julius Close, E14 2EH 19,578 1.96 2011-2015 62 263 324

10 The Oval 17,221 1.72 2006-2010 187 127 313

LS6 Tesco Site 24,372 2.44 2011-2015 124 186 310

LS14 Ailsa Street 46,919 4.69 2006-2010 153 147 300

LS15 41,968 4.20 2006-2010 153 139 292 Nairn St and Hays Depot Leven Rd Factory Site Devon Whart ID34 Idescon Court 17,179 1.72 2006-2010 167 123 290

102 British Estate 29,330 2.93 2011-2015 35 246 282

Isle of Dogs District Centre Core Area: Rear of 5-65

ID9 Glengall Grove and Finwhale House 48,963 4.90 2011-2015 115 158 273

CF12.E Aldgate Gyratory mixed 4,986 0.50 2011-2015 196 74 270

CF7 Foldgate St/ Spital Sq. 1,894 0.19 2006-2010 213 53 266

115 Gas works site, Ben Johnson Road, E1 34,025 3.40 2006-2010 58 199 257

CF22 Tobacco Dock 23,570 2.36 2006-2010 100 148 248

LS8 St Andrews Hospital 29,559 2.96 2006-2010 33 196 230

37 Greenheath Business Centre 5,399 0.54 2011-2015 175 52 227

ID35 31-39 Millharbour 5,247 0.52 2006-2010 36 186 222

ID36 Phase 2, Electron Building, Aspen Way 5,644 0.56 2006-2010 26 184 210

LS7 Imperial Street 25,177 2.52 2011-2015 57 141 198

ID19 Arrowhead Quay east of 163 Marsh Wall 5,486 0.55 2011-2015 151 45 196

LS17 Leven Road Gasworks 92,836 9.28 2011-2015 26 170 196

CF3 A Bishopsgate East 28,005 2.80 2011-2015 36 160 196

ID20 2 Millharbour 11,511 1.15 2011-2015 117 78 195

ID39 World Trade Centre 4, 5 5,510 0.55 2006-2010 152 43 195

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

112 Mile End Station and Surrounds 5,567 0.56 2011-2015 134 57 191

LS11 Bow Locks 16,056 1.61 2006-2010 78 111 188

35 255-279 Cambridge Heath Road 4,851 0.49 2006-2010 138 46 184

26 Chest Hospital 33,241 3.32 2011-2015 84 98 182

ID41 World Trade Centre 1, 2, 3 5,119 0.51 2006-2010 141 40 181

ID43 World Trade Centre 6, 7, 8 13,121 1.31 2006-2010 112 67 179

IDN8 1 Park Place 2,015 0.20 2006-2010 134 33 166

LS19 Lanrick Road 13,355 1.34 2006-2010 74 85 160

IDN5 41-43 Millharbour 5,023 0.50 2006-2010 26 128 154

437 21 Wapping Lane 7,650 0.77 2006-2010 36 117 153

IDN4 Mooring in Cutting and South Dock, Thames Quay 9,316 0.93 2006-2010 140 12 152

CF40 Whitechapel High Street, Plumbers Row & Mulberry Street 8,509 0.85 2006-2010 45 103 149

ID37 3 Limeharbour E14 9TQ 4,965 0.50 2006-2010 61 87 148

54 Former bottling plant and land at Raven Row, E1 9,934 0.99 2011-2015 86 62 147

LS20 Currie/Dunkeld Site 13,876 1.39 2006-2010 37 110 146

ID14 3 Millharbour 12,761 1.28 2006-2010 65 67 132

LS13 Gillender Street Site 16,045 1.60 2011-2015 129 2 131

86 Land, Meath Gardens - Mile End North Site 18,560 1.86 2006-2010 16 114 130

LS21 Leamouth Road 9,399 0.94 2011-2015 54 74 129

ID33 Lantern's Court 12,176 1.22 2006-2010 62 63 125

Land occupied by Readymix concrete, The Highway and 123 6,496 0.65 2011-2015 110 14 124 Butcher Row, E1 ID3 Northumberland Wharf 8,887 0.89 2006-2010 119 2 121

LS5 Hancock Road North 26,093 2.61 2011-2015 86 34 120

ID22.6 Mastmaker Court 9,454 0.95 2011-2015 51 65 116

95 Sorting Office Tredegar Road 5,283 0.53 2011-2015 68 47 115

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

CF42 Whitechapel High Street 3,985 0.40 2006-2010 69 40 109

CF19 Old Bishop Challoner School 11,682 1.17 2006-2010 13 93 106

CF36 52 - 58 Commercial Road 4,594 0.46 2006-2010 46 57 103

113 Southern Grove Lodge 10,786 1.08 2006-2010 13 86 99

120 Land east of Caroline Street, E1 4,800 0.48 2011-2015 77 19 96

ID6 Westferry Print Works 54,636 5.46 2011-2015 16 76 92

127 Commercial Road Council Housing 10,611 1.06 2006-2010 23 68 91

100 St Clements Hospital 18,487 1.85 2006-2010 13 78 90

CF33 Trinity Square and Trinity Place 2,586 0.26 2006-2010 72 18 90

CF2 B Bishopsgate Goosyard 7,155 0.72 2006-2010 19 69 88

ID28 Greenwich View 21,996 2.20 2016-2020 11 76 86

CF13 Aldgate Gyratory mixed 5,230 0.52 2011-2015 69 17 86

ID27 Cuba, Tobago & Manilla Street 10,885 1.09 2011-2015 10 73 84

CF1 Mildmay Hospital 7,471 0.75 2006-2010 31 52 83

ID22.5 4 Mastmaker 6,360 0.64 2011-2015 34 44 78

91 Safeways, Roman Road 8,036 0.80 2011-2015 53 23 76

ID40 Former Tate & Lyle Site 14,435 1.44 2011-2015 9 66 76

CF34 Sceptre St 2,067 0.21 2006-2010 57 14 72

LS31 Bow Baptist Church, 1 Payne Road, London, E3 2SP 1,822 0.18 2006-2010 11 57 68

CF39 Land on the Corner of Whitechurch Lane & Commercial Road 3,643 0.36 2006-2010 19 44 64

ID44 45 Millharbour 4,915 0.49 2011-2015 41 18 58

CF14 Prescott Street 3,492 0.35 2006-2010 48 10 57

ID10 443 - 451 Westferry Road 13,248 1.32 2006-2010 7 49 56

IDN9 Trafalgar Way McDonald’s Site 4,307 0.43 2016-2020 14 41 55

Site South of Repton Street and North of Salmon Lane East of 124 8,764 0.88 2006-2010 38 17 55 the railway and West of the canal

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

CF20 16-20 Dock St 1,136 0.11 2006-2010 7 46 52

ID26 15 Westferry Road 2,698 0.27 2011-2015 29 22 51

25 York Hall - Baths 5,732 0.57 2011-2015 12 39 51

LS18 Poplar Gas Works and Blackwall Trading Estate 11,363 1.14 2006-2010 6 42 48

3 Queen Elizabeth Hospital 6,706 0.67 2006-2010 7 39 47

CF3 D Bishopsgate East 5,054 0.51 2011-2015 7 35 42

CF23 B Old Nicholls Street and Redchurch Street 3,128 0.31 2006-2010 13 29 42

CF37 Old Factory Strout's Place - at Pelter Street and Diss Street 3,311 0.33 2006-2010 16 25 41

LS26 St Mathias Centre 4,251 0.43 2006-2010 5 36 41

21 Town Hall Patriot Square 4,005 0.40 2006-2010 5 34 38

ID21 Glengall Bridge West 8,869 0.89 2011-2015 5 33 37

122 Elizabeth Wharf, Maroon Street, E14 1,819 0.18 2011-2015 29 7 36

CF28 Osbourne Street Depot 2,606 0.26 2006-2010 6 28 34

ID15 397-411 Westferry Road 7,958 0.80 2006-2010 4 29 33

ID22.4 56-58 Marsh Wall 1,678 0.17 2011-2015 18 14 32

CF24 Old Nicholls Street and Redchurch Street 2,372 0.24 2006-2010 10 22 32

ID22.3 54 Marsh Wall 1,670 0.17 2011-2015 18 13 32

ID8 Jack Dash House 2,649 0.26 2011-2015 13 18 31

ID18 Preston's Road Site D 3,174 0.32 2011-2015 9 22 31

SW Junction of Poplar High St, Prestons Road, East of Poplar LS27 3,225 0.32 2006-2010 4 27 31 Business Park ID4 Kleins Wharf 7,221 0.72 2011-2015 4 26 30

CF23 C Old Nicholls Street and Redchurch Street 2,236 0.22 2006-2010 9 21 30

LS9 Twelvetrees Crescent 2,866 0.29 2006-2010 3 24 28

CF23 A Rochelle Centre and Former College 2,374 0.24 2006-2010 10 17 27

CF23 D Old Nicholls Street and Redchurch Street 1,971 0.20 2006-2010 8 18 26

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

ID22.2 50 Marsh Wall 1,300 0.13 2011-2015 14 10 25

LS29 71 Carmen Street and 134 to 156 Chrisp Street 4,440 0.44 2006-2010 3 19 23

ID17 Westferry Road 5,200 0.52 2011-2015 3 19 22

93 Cherrywood Close Works 2,443 0.24 2006-2010 3 19 21

ID22.1 63-69 Manilla Street 1,100 0.11 2011-2015 12 9 21

CF3 C Bishopsgate East 2,945 0.29 2011-2015 4 17 21

ID23 47 Millharbour 3,661 0.37 2011-2015 2 17 19

CF26 22 - 28 Underwood Road 1,249 0.12 2006-2010 2 17 19

CF31 Knighton Street 2,121 0.21 2006-2010 2 16 18

80 Chisendale Studios 1,757 0.18 2011-2015 10 7 17

CF2 C Bishopsgate Goosyard 1,083 0.11 2011-2015 3 12 15

LS30 Site at 3 to 5 and 19 to 25, Payne Road, E3 2SP 3,782 0.38 2006-2010 2 13 15

CF38 Central House – London Metropolitan University 8,012 0.80 2006-2010 13 2 14

CF41 Sclater Street 472 0.05 2006-2010 8 5 13

CF16 Scarborough Street 942 0.09 2006-2010 2 11 13

CF25 Foxes Yard 1,638 0.16 2006-2010 2 11 13

92 Fire Station Parnell Road & Roman Road 2,357 0.24 2011-2015 2 11 12

97 Grove Retail Units 1,107 0.11 2006-2010 6 5 11

114 218 Bow Common Lane & Yard to the rear 874 0.09 2016-2020 1 7 8

79 Victoria Park Wharf 11,445 1.14 2006-2010 6 1 6

CF8 East of 588 0.06 2006-2010 1 4 5

89 Offices of old Ford House Association, Usher Road 339 0.03 2006-2010 3 2 5

16 Warehouse Bishops Way 10,488 1.05 2006-2010 1 4 5

LS28 260-268 Poplar High Street, London, E14 0BB 813 0.08 2006-2010 1 3 4

18 Rushmead 684 0.07 2011-2015 1 3 4

143 117 Poplar High Street 622 0.06 2011-2015 1 3 3

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

129 Lipstick Site, West India Dock Road 169 0.02 2006-2010 1 1 3

4 Pritchard's Road & Marrion Place 2,289 0.23 2006-2010 3 0 3

C100 Poplar Baths 2,860 0.29 2011-2015 2 0 2

CF35 Whitechapel Library 1,380 0.14 2006-2010 2 0 2

CF30 Cheviot House 510 0.05 2006-2010 1 0 1

CF3 B Bishopsgate East 1,276 0.13 2011-2015 0 0 0

77 Prusom Street 845 0.08 2006-2010 0 0 0

117 White Horse Road / Elsa Street 530 0.05 2006-2010 0 0 0

53 Coronet Cinema and adjacent site 2,545 0.25 2006-2010 0 0 0

70 2 Jubilee Street 878 0.09 2006-2010 0 0 0

CF21.A Whitechapel Hospital - 83,249 8.32 2006-2010 0 0 0

111 331 Mile End Road 240 0.02 2006-2010 0 0 0

Arches between Burfett Road and Bow Coming Land E3(known 121 2,886 0.29 2006-2010 0 0 0 as Wager Street Arches) LS22 Orchard Wharf 12,780 1.28 2011-2015 0 0 0

17 Pollard Row & Old Bethnal Green Road 1,231 0.12 2011-2015 0 0 0

CF4 Existing East London Train Line 3,027 0.30 2006-2010 0 0 0

71 Sutton Street Council Depot 1,974 0.20 2006-2010 0 0 0

90 Rear of St Marys College 20,604 2.06 2006-2010 0 0 0

133 Glaucus Street Council Depot 7,370 0.74 2006-2010 0 0 0

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

Appendix C - Borough-wide development site locations in the context of the rail network and Borough-wide bus network

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

Appendix D - PTAL values for developments

AAP Site Site Name/Address PTAL Area ID

CF1 Mildmay Hospital 4

CF2 A Bishopsgate Goodsyard 4

CF2 B Bishopsgate Goodsyard 4

CF2 C Bishopsgate Goodsyard 4

CF3 A Bishopsgate East 4

CF3 B Bishopsgate East 4

CF3 C Bishopsgate East 4

CF3 D Bishopsgate East 4

CF4 Existing East London Train Line 4

CF5 Nicholson Clarke - Fleur de Lis Street 4

CF6 Trumans Brewery 4

CF7 Foldgate St/ Spital Sq. 4

CITY FRINGE AREA CF8 East of Brick Lane 5

CF9 Brushfield Street Wool Exchange 5

CF12.A Middlesex Street Rodwell House 5

CF12.B Goodmans Fields 5

CF12.C Aldgate Gyratory mixed 5

CF12.D Aldgate Gyratory mixed 5

CF12.E Aldgate Gyratory mixed 5

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

CF12.F Aldgate Gyratory mixed 5

CF12.G Aldgate Gyratory mixed 5

CF12.H Aldgate Gyratory mixed 5

CF13 Aldgate Gyratory mixed 5

CF14 Prescott Street 5

CF15 Mansell Street 5

CF16 Scarborough Street

CF19 Old Bishop Challoner School 5

CF20 16-20 Dock St 5

CF21 News International 5

CF21.A Whitechapel Hospital - Royal London Hospital 5

CF22 Tobacco Dock 5

CF23 A Rochelle Centre and Former College 5

CF23 B Old Nicholls Street and Redchurch Street 5

CF23 C Old Nicholls Street and Redchurch Street 5

CF23 D Old Nicholls Street and Redchurch Street 5

CF24 Old Nicholls Street and Redchurch Street 5

CF25 Foxes Yard 5

CF26 22 - 28 Underwood Road 5

CF28 Osbourne Street Depot 5

CF30 Cheviot House 5

CF31 Knighton Street 5

CF33 Trinity Square and Trinity Place 5

CF34 Sceptre St 5

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

CF35 Whitechapel Library 5

CF36 52 - 58 Commercial Road 5

CF37 Old Factory Strout's Place - at Pelter Street and Diss Street 5

CF38 Central House – London Metropolitan University 5

CF39 Land on the Corner of Whitechurch Lane & Commercial Road 5

CF40 Whitechapel High Street, Plumbers Row & Mulberry Street 5

CF41 Sclater Street 5

CF42 Whitechapel High 5

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

AAP Site Site Name/Address PTAL Area ID

ID1 North Quay 1b

ID2 Billingsgate Market 1b

ID3 Northumberland Wharf 1b

ID4 Kleins Wharf 6a

ID5 Wood Wharf 6a

ID6 Westferry Print Works 6a

ID7 Skylines Harbour 6a

ID8 jack Dash House 6a

Isle of Dogs District Centre Core Area: Rear of 5-65 Glengall ID9 Grove and Finwhale House 6a

ID10 443 - 451 Westferry Road 6a

ID11 London Arena 6a

ID12 Heron Quays 6a ISLE OF DOGS AREA ID13 South Quay Plaza 6a

ID14 3 Millharbour 6a

ID15 397-411 Westferry Road 6a

ID16 Reuters, 1 Paul Julius Close, E14 2EH 6a

ID17 Westferry Road 6a

ID18 Preston's Road Site D 6a

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

ID19 Arrowhead Quay east of 163 Marsh Wall 6a

ID20 2 Millharbour 6a

ID21 Glengall Bridge West 6a

ID22.1 63-69 Manilla Street 6a

ID22.2 50 Marsh Wall 6a

ID22.3 54 Marsh Wall 6a

ID22.4 56-58 Marsh Wall 6a

ID22.5 4 Mastmaker 6a

ID22.6 Mastmaker Court 6a

ID23 47 Millharbour 6a

22-28 Marsh Wall And 2 Cuba Street and 17 to 23 Westferry Road, ID25 Marsh Wall 6a

ID26 15 Westferry Road 6b

ID27 Cuba, Tobago & Manilla Street 6b

ID28 Greenwich View 6b

ID32 Columbus House 6b

ID33 Lantern's Court 6b

ID34 Idescon Court 6b

ID35 31-39 Millharbour 6b

ID36 Phase 2, Electron Building, Aspen Way 6b

ID37 3 Limeharbour E14 9TQ 6b

ID38 Canary Riverside 6b

ID39 World Trade Centre 4,5. 6b

ID40 Former Tate & Lyle Site 6b

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

ID41 World Trade Centre 1,2,3. 6b

ID42 1 Millharbour 6b

ID43 World Trade Centre 6, 7, 8 6b

ID44 45 Millharbour 6b

ID45 Thames Quay 6b

ID46 Marsh Wall West 6b

ID47 Harbour Exchange Square 6b

ID48 Admirals Way 6b

IDN4 Mooring in Millwall Cutting and South Dock, Thames Quay 6b

IDN5 41-43 Millharbour 6b

IDN8 1 Park Place 6b

IDN9 Trafalgar Way McDonalds Site 6b

IDN10 15 Canada Square 6b

IDN11 5 Churchill Place 6b

IDN12 10 & 20 Churchill Place 6b

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

AAP Site Site Name/Address PTAL Area ID

LS1 North Fish Island 6b

LS2 East Fish Island 6b

LS3 Central Fish Island 6b

LS4 South Fish Island 6b

LS5 Hancock Road North 6b

LS6 Tesco Site 6b

LS7 Imperial Street 6b

LS8 St Andrews Hospital 6b

LS9 Twelvetrees Crescent 6b

E AREA LS11 Bow Locks 6b D LS12 Empson Street / St Andrews Way 6b

LS13 Gillender Street Site 6b LEASI

LS14 Ailsa Street 6b

Nairn Street and Hays Depot Leven Road Factory Site Devon LS15 Whart 6b

LS17 Leven Road Gasworks 6b

LS18 Poplar Gas Works and Blackwall Trading Estate 6b

LS19 Lanrick Road 6b

LS20 Currie/Dunkeld Site 6b

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

LS21 Leamouth Road 6b

LS22 Orchard Wharf 6b

LS23 Orchard Place North 6b

LS24 Leamouth Penninsula 6b

LS25 Blackwall Stations / Blackwall Reach, Naval Row 6b

LS26 St Mathias Centre 6b

SW Junction of Poplar High St, Prestons Rd, East of Poplar LS27 Business Park 6b

LS28 260-268 Poplar High Street, London, E14 0BB 6b

LS29 71 Carmen Street and 134 to 156 Chrisp Street 6b

LS30 Site at 3 to 5 and 19 to 25, Payne Road, E3 2SP 6b

LS31 Bow Baptist Church, 1 Payne Road, London, E3 2SP 6b

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

AAP Site Site Name/Address PTAL Area ID

3 Queen Elizabeth Hospital 2

4 Pritchard's Road & Marrion Place 2

7 Prichard Road Gas Works 2

10 The Oval 2

12 Wadeson Street, Canal, Emma Street 2

16 Warehouse Bishops Way 2

17 Pollard Row & Old Bethnal Green Road 2

18 Rushmead 2

21 Town Hall Patriot Square 2

25 York Hall - Baths 2

26 Chest Hospital 2

35 255-279 Cambridge Heath Road 2 CENTRAL AREA 37 Greenheath Business Centre 2

42 Cambridge Heath Road, Railway, Three Colts Lane, Birkbeck 2

53 Coronet Cinema and adjacent site 2

54 Former bottling plant and land at Raven Row, E1 2

70 2 Jubilee Street 3

71 Sutton Street Council Depot 3

77 Prusom Street 3

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

79 Victoria Park Wharf 3

80 Chisendale Studios 3

86 British Rail Land, Meath Gardens - Mile End north Site 3

89 Offices of old Ford House Association, Usher Road 3

90 Rear of St Marys College 3

91 Safeways, Roman Road 3

92 Fire Station Parnell Road & Roman Road 3

93 Cherrywood Close Works 3

95 Sorting Office Tredegar Road 3

97 Grove Retail Units 3

100 St Clements Hospital 3

102 British Estate 3

111 331 Mile End Road 3

112 Mile End Station and Surrounds 3

113 Southern Grove Lodge 3

114 218 Bow Common Lane & Yard to the rear 3

115 Gas works site, Ben Johnson Road, E1 3

117 White Horse Road / Elsa Street 3

Sites between Brodlove Lane/The Highway/Cable Street/Butcher 119 Row, E1 3

120 Land east of Caroline Street, E1 4

Arches between Burfett Road and Bow Coming Land E3(known as 121 Wager Street Arches) 4

122 Elizabeth Wharf, Maroon Street, E14 4

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

Land occupied by Readymix concrete, The Highway and Butcher 123 Row, E1 4

Site South of Repton Street and North of Salmon Lane East of the 124 railway and West of the canal 4

Bow Common Gasworks, Bow Common Lane, E3 and adjoining 125 arches 4

127 Commercial Road Council Housing 4

Land between Furze Street, Devons Road and Bow Common 128 Land, E3 4

129 Lipstick Site, West India Dock Road 4

133 Glaucus Street Council Depot 4

143 117 Poplar High Street 4

437 21 Wapping Lane 4

C100 Poplar Baths

CAW Windfall Housing 2006 - 2010

CAW Windfall Housing 2011 - 2015

CAW Windfall Housing 2016- 2020

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

Appendix E - Existing baseline and future capacity and line loadings

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold Buro Happold

High Density Residential Without Crossrail With , 006 2,010 2,015 2,020 2, 020

Proposed AM Proposed AM Proposed AM Proposed AM Proposed AM Line Direction Section Residual Capacity Base Residual Capacity Base Residual Capacity Base Residual Capacity Residual Capacity Aditional trips Peak Hour Aditional trips Peak Hour Aditional trips Peak Hour Aditional trips Peak Hour Base loadings Aditional trips Peak Hour Base loadings + Trains per LUL crush LUL planning loadings + Trains per LUL crush LUL planning loadings + Trains per LUL crush LUL planning loadings + Trains per LUL crush LUL planning Trains per LUL crush LUL planning from Passenger from Passenger from Passenger from Passenger + Growth from Passenger Growth forecasts hour capacity standard Growth hour capacity standard Growth hour capacity standard Growth hour capacity standard hour capacity standard developments Loadings (08:00 - developments Loadings (08:00 - developments Loadings (08:00 - developments Loadings (08:00 - forecasts developments Loadings (08:00 - No. % % Capacity forecasts No. % % Capacity forecasts No. % % Capacity forecasts No. % % Capacity No. % % Capacity 09:00) 09:00) 09:00) 09:00) 09:00) in use in use in use in use in use London Underground Ltd Central Line Westbound Stratford - Mile end 18,927 18,927 30 31,410 1 5,705 1 2,483 40 0.60 19,280 104 19,383 30 31,410 15,705 12,027 38 0.62 19,721 304 20,129 30 3 1,410 1 5,705 11,281 36 0.64 20,163 91 20,661 30 31,410 15,705 10,749 34 0.66 20,163 76 18,802 30 31,410 15,705 12,608 4 0 0.60 Mile end - Bethnal green 20,552 20,552 30 31,410 1 5,705 1 0,858 35 0.65 20,936 94 21,030 30 31,410 15,705 10,380 33 0.67 21,415 442 21,952 30 3 1,410 1 5,705 9,458 30 0.70 21,895 31 22,462 30 31,410 15,705 8,948 28 0.72 21,895 26 20,441 30 31,410 15,705 10,969 3 5 0.65 Bethnal green - Liverpool street 21,874 21,874 30 31,410 1 5,705 9 ,536 30 0.70 22,282 73 22,355 30 31,410 15,705 9,055 29 0.71 22,793 76 22,941 30 3 1,410 1 5,705 8,469 27 0.73 23,303 31 23,482 30 31,410 15,705 7,928 25 0.75 23,303 26 21,369 30 31,410 15,705 10,041 3 2 0.68 Liverpool street - Bank 22,492 22,492 30 31,410 1 5,705 8 ,918 28 0.72 22,911 73 22,984 30 31,410 15,705 8,426 27 0.73 23,436 76 23,585 30 3 1,410 1 5,705 7,825 25 0.75 23,961 31 24,140 30 31,410 15,705 7,270 23 0.77 23,961 26 21,968 30 31,410 15,705 9,442 3 0 0.70

Eastbound Bank - Liverpool street 6,797 6 ,797 27 28,269 1 4,135 2 1,472 76 0.24 6,923 49 6,972 27 28,269 14,135 21,297 75 0.25 7,082 293 7,424 28 2 9,316 1 4,658 21,892 75 0.25 7,240 3 7,585 28 29,316 14,658 21,731 74 0.26 7,240 2 6,903 28 29,316 14,658 22,413 7 6 0.24 Liverpool street - Bethnal green 3,522 3 ,522 27 28,269 1 4,135 2 4,747 88 0.12 3,588 49 3,637 27 28,269 14,135 24,632 87 0.13 3,670 293 4,012 28 2 9,316 1 4,658 25,304 86 0.14 3,752 3 4,097 28 29,316 14,658 25,219 86 0.14 3,752 2 3,728 28 29,316 14,658 25,588 8 7 0.13 Bethnal green - Mile end 3,680 3 ,680 27 28,269 1 4,135 2 4,589 87 0.13 3,749 22 3,771 27 28,269 14,135 24,498 87 0.13 3,834 34 3,890 28 2 9,316 1 4,658 25,426 87 0.13 3,920 3 3,979 28 29,316 14,658 25,337 86 0.14 3,920 2 3,621 28 29,316 14,658 25,695 8 8 0.12 Mile End - Stratford 3,182 3 ,182 27 28,269 1 4,135 2 5,087 89 0.11 3,242 37 3,279 27 28,269 14,135 24,990 88 0.12 3,316 137 3,490 28 2 9,316 1 4,658 25,826 88 0.12 3,390 9 3,572 28 29,316 14,658 25,744 88 0.12 3,390 7 3,251 28 29,316 14,658 26,065 8 9 0.11

Jubilee Line Westbound Canning town - North greenwich 5,534 5 ,534 16 15,381 7 ,691 9 ,847 64 0.36 5,637 1,455 7,093 30 28,840 14,420 21,747 75 0.25 5,766 1,261 8,483 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 20,357 71 0.29 5,896 2,133 10,745 30 28,840 14,420 18,095 63 0.37 5,896 2,131 10,101 30 28,840 14,420 18,739 6 5 0.35 North greenwich - Canary wharf 6,915 6 ,915 20 19,227 9 ,613 12,311 64 0.36 7,044 1 ,455 8 ,500 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 20,340 7 1 0.29 7 ,206 1 ,261 9 ,922 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 1 8,918 66 0 .34 7 ,367 2 ,133 1 2,217 30 28,840 1 4,420 1 6,623 58 0.42 7,367 2 ,131 1 1,484 3 0 28,840 14,420 17,356 6 0 0.40 Canary wharf - Canada water 6,597 6 ,597 20 19,227 9 ,613 12,630 66 0.34 6,720 610 7,330 30 28,840 14,420 21,510 75 0.25 6,874 725 8,209 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 20,631 72 0.28 7,028 625 8,988 30 28,840 14,420 19,852 69 0.31 7,028 609 8,449 30 28,840 14,420 20,391 7 1 0.29 Canada water - Bermondsey 8,623 8 ,623 20 19,227 9 ,613 10,604 55 0.45 8,784 610 9,394 30 28,840 14,420 19,446 67 0.33 8,985 725 10,320 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 18,520 64 0.36 9,186 625 11,147 30 28,840 14,420 17,693 61 0.39 9,186 609 10,478 30 28,840 14,420 18,362 6 4 0.36 Bermondsey - London bridge 9,444 9 ,444 20 19,227 9 ,613 9 ,782 51 0.49 9,621 610 10,231 30 28,840 14,420 18,609 65 0.35 9,841 725 11,176 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 17,664 61 0.39 10,061 625 12,022 30 28,840 14,420 16,818 58 0.42 10,061 609 11,300 30 28,840 14,420 17,540 6 1 0.39 London bridge - Southwark 10,639 10,639 20 19,227 9 ,613 8 ,587 45 0.55 10,838 610 11,448 30 28,840 14,420 17,392 60 0.40 11,086 725 12,421 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 16,419 57 0.43 11,334 625 13,294 30 28,840 14,420 15,546 54 0.46 11,334 609 12,497 30 28,840 14,420 16,343 5 7 0.43

Eastbound Southwark - London bridge 8,268 8 ,268 24 23,072 1 1,536 1 4,804 64 0.36 8,422 1,849 10,271 30 28,840 14,420 18,569 64 0.36 8,615 1,601 12,065 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 16,775 58 0.42 8,808 2,859 15,117 30 28,840 14,420 13,723 48 0.52 8,808 2,856 14,210 30 28,840 14,420 14,630 5 1 0.49 London bridge - Bermondsey 8,845 8 ,845 24 23,072 1 1,536 1 4,227 62 0.38 9,010 1,849 10,860 30 28,840 14,420 17,980 62 0.38 9,217 1,601 12,667 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 16,173 56 0.44 9,423 2,859 15,732 30 28,840 14,420 13,108 45 0.55 9,423 2,856 14,788 30 28,840 14,420 14,052 4 9 0.51 Bermondsey - Canada water 8,524 8 ,524 24 23,072 1 1,536 1 4,548 63 0.37 8,683 1 ,849 1 0,532 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 18,308 6 3 0.37 8 ,882 1 ,601 1 2,332 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 1 6,508 57 0 .43 9 ,081 2 ,859 1 5,390 30 28,840 1 4,420 1 3,450 47 0.53 9,081 2 ,856 1 4,466 3 0 28,840 14,420 14,374 5 0 0.50 Canada water - Canary wharf 9,120 9 ,120 24 23,072 1 1,536 1 3,952 60 0.40 9,290 1,849 11,139 30 28,840 14,420 17,701 61 0.39 9,503 1,601 12,953 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 15,887 55 0.45 9,715 2,859 16,025 30 28,840 14,420 12,815 44 0.56 9,715 2,856 15,063 30 28,840 14,420 13,777 4 8 0.52 Canary wharf - North greenwich 1,739 1 ,739 24 23,072 1 1,536 2 1,333 92 0.08 1,771 366 2,137 30 28,840 14,420 26,703 93 0.07 1,812 480 2,658 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 26,182 91 0.09 1,852 417 3,115 30 28,840 14,420 25,725 89 0.11 1,852 406 2,928 30 28,840 14,420 25,912 9 0 0.10 North greenwich - Canning town 1,836 1 ,836 20 19,227 9 ,613 17,391 90 0.10 1,870 366 2,236 30 28,840 14,420 26,604 92 0.08 1,913 480 2,759 30 2 8,840 1 4,420 26,081 90 0.10 1,956 417 3,219 30 28,840 14,420 25,621 89 0.11 1,956 406 3,026 30 28,840 14,420 25,814 9 0 0.10

District Line Westbound West ham - Bromley-by-bow 8,999 8 ,999 19 18,335 9 ,168 9 ,336 51 0.49 9,167 156 9,323 18 17,370 8,685 8,047 46 0.54 9,377 695 10,228 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 7,142 41 0.59 9,587 33 10,471 18 17,370 8,685 6,899 40 0.60 9,587 33 10,052 18 17,370 8,685 7,318 4 2 0.58 Bromley-by-bow - Bow road 9,101 9 ,101 19 18,335 9 ,168 9 ,234 50 0.50 9,271 178 9,449 18 17,370 8,685 7,921 46 0.54 9,483 479 10,140 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 7,230 42 0.58 9,696 33 10,385 18 17,370 8,685 6,985 40 0.60 9,696 33 9,970 18 17,370 8,685 7,400 4 3 0.57 Bow road - Mile end 9,734 9 ,734 19 18,335 9 ,168 8 ,601 47 0.53 9,916 184 10,100 18 17,370 8,685 7,270 42 0.58 10,143 374 10,701 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 6,669 38 0.62 10,370 19 10,947 18 17,370 8,685 6,423 37 0.63 10,370 17 10,509 18 17,370 8,685 6,861 3 9 0.61 Mile end - Stepney green 9,125 9 ,125 19 18,335 9 ,168 9 ,210 50 0.50 9,295 223 9,518 18 17,370 8,685 7,852 45 0.55 9,508 290 10,020 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 7,350 42 0.58 9,721 50 10,283 18 17,370 8,685 7,087 41 0.59 9,721 43 9,872 18 17,370 8,685 7,498 4 3 0.57 Stepney green - Whitechapel 9,077 9 ,077 19 18,335 9 ,168 9 ,258 50 0.50 9,246 223 9,469 18 17,370 8,685 7,901 45 0.55 9,458 288 9,969 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 7,401 43 0.57 9,670 50 10,230 18 17,370 8,685 7,140 41 0.59 9,670 43 9,821 18 17,370 8,685 7,549 4 3 0.57 Whitechapel - Aldgate east 9,398 9 ,398 19 18,335 9 ,168 8 ,937 49 0.51 9,574 224 9,797 18 17,370 8,685 7,573 44 0.56 9,793 332 10,349 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 7,021 40 0.60 10,012 50 10,618 18 17,370 8,685 6,752 39 0.61 10,012 43 10,193 18 17,370 8,685 7,177 4 1 0.59 Aldgate east - Tower hill 8,994 8 ,994 19 18,335 9 ,168 9 ,341 51 0.49 9,162 157 9,318 18 17,370 8,685 8,052 46 0.54 9,371 266 9,794 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 7,576 44 0.56 9,581 44 10,047 18 17,370 8,685 7,323 42 0.58 9,581 37 9,645 18 17,370 8,685 7,725 4 4 0.56 Tower hill - Monument 11,888 11,888 21 20,265 1 0,133 8 ,377 41 0.59 12,110 1 57 1 2,267 22 2 1,230 1 0,615 8,963 4 2 0.58 1 2,388 2 66 1 2,810 22 2 1,230 1 0,615 8 ,420 40 0 .60 12,665 4 4 13,131 22 21,230 1 0,615 8 ,099 38 0.62 12,665 3 7 1 2,605 2 2 21,230 10,615 8,625 4 1 0.59

Eastbound Monument -Tower hill 4,715 4 ,715 21 20,265 1 0,133 1 5,550 77 0.23 4,803 241 5,044 22 21,230 10,615 16,186 76 0.24 4,913 615 5,769 22 2 1,230 1 0,615 15,461 73 0.27 5,023 17 5,896 22 21,230 10,615 15,334 72 0.28 5,023 16 5,661 22 21,230 10,615 15,569 7 3 0.27 Tower hill- Aldgate east 2,361 2 ,361 19 18,335 9 ,168 15,974 87 0.13 2,405 241 2,646 18 17,370 8,685 14,724 85 0.15 2,460 615 3,317 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 14,053 81 0.19 2,515 17 3,389 18 17,370 8,685 13,981 80 0.20 2,515 16 3,253 18 17,370 8,685 14,117 8 1 0.19 Aldgate east - Whitechapel 1,355 1 ,355 19 18,335 9 ,168 16,980 93 0.07 1,380 49 1,429 18 17,370 8,685 15,941 92 0.08 1,411 321 1,781 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 15,589 90 0.10 1,443 17 1,829 18 17,370 8,685 15,541 89 0.11 1,443 16 1,756 18 17,370 8,685 15,614 9 0 0.10 Whitechapel - Stepney green 1,298 1 ,298 19 18,335 9 ,168 17,037 93 0.07 1,323 5 7 1,380 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 15,990 9 2 0.08 1 ,353 2 47 1,658 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 1 5,712 90 0 .10 1 ,383 1 7 1 ,705 18 17,370 8 ,685 1 5,665 90 0.10 1,383 1 6 1,637 1 8 17,370 8,685 15,733 9 1 0.09 Stepney green - Mile end 1,223 1 ,223 19 18,335 9 ,168 17,112 93 0.07 1,245 59 1,305 18 17,370 8,685 16,065 92 0.08 1,274 263 1,596 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 15,774 91 0.09 1,302 19 1,644 18 17,370 8,685 15,726 91 0.09 1,302 18 1,578 18 17,370 8,685 15,792 9 1 0.09 Mile end - Bow road 1,345 1 ,345 19 18,335 9 ,168 16,990 93 0.07 1,370 59 1,430 18 17,370 8,685 15,940 92 0.08 1,402 273 1,734 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 15,636 90 0.10 1,433 15 1,780 18 17,370 8,685 15,590 90 0.10 1,433 15 1,709 18 17,370 8,685 15,661 9 0 0.10 Bow road - Bromley-by-bow 1,205 1 ,205 19 18,335 9 ,168 17,130 93 0.07 1,228 61 1,289 18 17,370 8,685 16,081 93 0.07 1,256 217 1,534 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 15,836 91 0.09 1,284 7 1,569 18 17,370 8,685 15,801 91 0.09 1,284 7 1,507 18 17,370 8,685 15,863 9 1 0.09 Bromley-by-bow - West ham 1,077 1 ,077 19 18,335 9 ,168 17,258 94 0.06 1,097 59 1,156 18 17,370 8,685 16,214 93 0.07 1,122 85 1,267 18 1 7,370 8 ,685 16,103 93 0.07 1,147 7 1,299 18 17,370 8,685 16,071 93 0.07 1,147 7 1,247 18 17,370 8,685 16,123 9 3 0.07

Ham & City Line Westbound West ham - Bromley-by-bow 1,983 1 ,983 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 5 ,025 72 0.28 2,020 148 2,168 8 7,008 3,504 4,840 69 0.31 2,067 695 2,910 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 4,098 58 0.42 2,113 33 2,989 8 7,008 3,504 4,019 57 0.43 2,113 33 2,750 8 7,008 3,504 4,258 6 1 0.39 Bromley-by-bow - Bow road 2,121 2 ,121 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 4 ,887 70 0.30 2,161 1 69 2,331 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 4,677 6 7 0.33 2 ,211 4 79 2,859 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 4 ,149 59 0 .41 2 ,260 3 3 2 ,941 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 4 ,067 58 0.42 2,260 3 3 2,706 8 7,008 3,504 4,302 6 1 0.39 Bow road - Mile end 2,455 2 ,455 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 4 ,553 65 0.35 2,501 176 2,677 8 7,008 3,504 4,331 62 0.38 2,558 374 3,108 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 3,900 56 0.44 2,616 19 3,185 8 7,008 3,504 3,823 55 0.45 2,616 17 2,930 8 7,008 3,504 4,078 5 8 0.42 Mile end - Stepney green 2,040 2 ,040 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 4 ,968 71 0.29 2,078 206 2,284 8 7,008 3,504 4,724 67 0.33 2,125 261 2,593 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 4,415 63 0.37 2,173 50 2,690 8 7,008 3,504 4,318 62 0.38 2,173 43 2,475 8 7,008 3,504 4,533 6 5 0.35 Stepney green - Whitechapel 2,342 2 ,342 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 4 ,666 67 0.33 2,385 206 2,592 8 7,008 3,504 4,416 63 0.37 2,440 288 2,934 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 4,074 58 0.42 2,495 50 3,039 8 7,008 3,504 3,969 57 0.43 2,495 43 2,796 8 7,008 3,504 4,212 6 0 0.40 Whitechapel - Aldgate east 3,025 3 ,025 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 3 ,983 57 0.43 3,081 208 3,289 8 7,008 3,504 3,719 53 0.47 3,152 332 3,691 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 3,317 47 0.53 3,222 50 3,812 8 7,008 3,504 3,196 46 0.54 3,222 43 3,507 8 7,008 3,504 3,501 5 0 0.50 Aldgate east - Liverpool street 3,347 3 ,347 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 3 ,661 52 0.48 3,410 140 3,550 8 7,008 3,504 3,458 49 0.51 3,488 266 3,893 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 3,115 44 0.56 3,566 44 4,015 8 7,008 3,504 2,993 43 0.57 3,566 37 3,694 8 7,008 3,504 3,314 4 7 0.53 Liverpool street - Moorgate 4,538 4 ,538 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 2 ,470 35 0.65 4,623 140 4,763 8 7,008 3,504 2,245 32 0.68 4,728 266 5,134 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 1,874 27 0.73 4,834 44 5,284 8 7,008 3,504 1,724 25 0.75 4,834 37 4,861 8 7,008 3,504 2,147 3 1 0.69

Eastbound Moorgate -Liverpool street 2,770 2 ,770 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 4 ,238 60 0.40 2,821 2 33 3 ,054 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 3,954 5 6 0.44 2 ,886 6 15 3,734 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 3 ,274 47 0 .53 2 ,951 1 7 3 ,815 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 3 ,193 46 0.54 2,951 1 6 3,510 8 7,008 3,504 3,498 5 0 0.50 Liverpool street - Aldgate east 1,884 1 ,884 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 5 ,124 73 0.27 1,919 233 2,152 8 7,008 3,504 4,856 69 0.31 1,963 615 2,811 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 4,197 60 0.40 2,007 17 2,872 8 7,008 3,504 4,136 59 0.41 2,007 16 2,642 8 7,008 3,504 4,366 6 2 0.38 Aldgate east - Whitechapel 1,021 1 ,021 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 5 ,987 85 0.15 1,040 23 1,063 8 7,008 3,504 5,945 85 0.15 1,064 266 1,353 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 5,655 81 0.19 1,087 17 1,393 8 7,008 3,504 5,615 80 0.20 1,087 16 1,282 8 7,008 3,504 5,726 8 2 0.18 Whitechapel - Stepney green 777 777 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 6 ,231 89 0.11 792 49 840 8 7,008 3,504 6,168 88 0.12 810 247 1,106 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 5,902 84 0.16 828 17 1,141 8 7,008 3,504 5,867 84 0.16 828 16 1,050 8 7,008 3,504 5,958 8 5 0.15 Stepney green - Mile end 689 689 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 6 ,319 90 0.10 702 49 751 8 7,008 3,504 6,257 89 0.11 718 262 1,029 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 5,979 85 0.15 734 17 1,062 8 7,008 3,504 5,946 85 0.15 734 16 977 8 7,008 3,504 6,031 8 6 0.14 Mile end - Bow road 525 525 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 6 ,483 93 0.07 535 5 5 5 90 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 6,418 9 2 0.08 5 47 2 96 8 98 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 6 ,110 87 0 .13 5 60 2 2 9 32 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 6 ,076 87 0.13 560 2 1 8 57 8 7,008 3,504 6,151 8 8 0.12 Bow road - Bromley-by-bow 462 462 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 6 ,546 93 0.07 470 57 527 8 7,008 3,504 6,481 92 0.08 481 217 755 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 6,253 89 0.11 492 7 773 8 7,008 3,504 6,235 89 0.11 492 7 711 8 7,008 3,504 6,297 9 0 0.10 Bromley-by-bow - West ham 426 426 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 6 ,582 94 0.06 434 54 488 8 7,008 3,504 6,520 93 0.07 444 85 584 8 7 ,008 3 ,504 6,424 92 0.08 454 7 601 8 7,008 3,504 6,407 91 0.09 454 7 553 8 7,008 3,504 6,455 9 2 0.08

East London Southbound Shoreditch - Whitechapel 140 140 10 5 ,570 2 ,785 5 ,430 97 0.03 143 72 215 12 6,684 3,342 6,469 97 0.03 146 70 288 16 8 ,912 4 ,456 8,624 97 0.03 149 - 292 16 8,912 4,456 8,620 97 0.03 149 - 297 16 8,912 4,456 8,615 9 7 0.03 Whitechapel - Shadwell 397 397 10 5 ,570 2 ,785 5 ,173 93 0.07 405 72 477 12 6,684 3,342 6,207 93 0.07 414 57 543 16 8 ,912 4 ,456 8,369 94 0.06 423 - 552 16 8,912 4,456 8,360 94 0.06 423 - 563 16 8,912 4,456 8,349 9 4 0.06 Shadwell - Wapping 447 447 10 5 ,570 2 ,785 5 ,123 92 0.08 456 58 514 12 6,684 3,342 6,170 92 0.08 466 33 557 16 8 ,912 4 ,456 8,355 94 0.06 477 - 568 16 8,912 4,456 8,344 94 0.06 477 - 579 16 8,912 4,456 8,333 9 4 0.06 Wapping - Rotherhithe 524 524 10 5 ,570 2 ,785 5 ,046 91 0.09 534 7 7 6 11 12 6 ,684 3 ,342 6,073 9 1 0.09 5 46 3 3 6 57 16 8 ,912 4 ,456 8 ,255 93 0 .07 5 58 - 6 69 16 8 ,912 4 ,456 8 ,243 92 0.08 558 - 6 82 1 6 8,912 4,456 8,230 9 2 0.08 Rotherhithe - Canada water 572 572 10 5 ,570 2 ,785 4 ,998 90 0.10 583 77 660 12 6,684 3,342 6,024 90 0.10 596 33 707 16 8 ,912 4 ,456 8,205 92 0.08 610 - 720 16 8,912 4,456 8,192 92 0.08 610 - 735 16 8,912 4,456 8,177 9 2 0.08

Northbound Canada water - Rotherhithe 1,772 1 ,772 10 5 ,570 2 ,785 3 ,798 68 0.32 1,805 47 1,852 12 6,684 3,342 4,832 72 0.28 1,847 22 1,915 16 8 ,912 4 ,456 6,997 79 0.21 1,888 - 1,957 16 8,912 4,456 6,955 78 0.22 1,888 - 1,996 16 8,912 4,456 6,916 7 8 0.22 Rotherhithe - Wapping 2,164 2 ,164 10 5 ,570 2 ,785 3 ,406 61 0.39 2,205 47 2,252 12 6,684 3,342 4,432 66 0.34 2,255 22 2,324 16 8 ,912 4 ,456 6,588 74 0.26 2,306 - 2,374 16 8,912 4,456 6,538 73 0.27 2,306 - 2,422 16 8,912 4,456 6,490 7 3 0.27 Wapping - Shadwell 2,350 2 ,350 10 5 ,570 2 ,785 3 ,220 58 0.42 2,394 51 2,445 12 6,684 3,342 4,239 63 0.37 2,448 22 2,522 16 8 ,912 4 ,456 6,390 72 0.28 2,503 - 2,577 16 8,912 4,456 6,335 71 0.29 2,503 - 2,628 16 8,912 4,456 6,284 7 1 0.29 Shadwell - Whitechapel 2,140 2 ,140 10 5 ,570 2 ,785 3 ,430 62 0.38 2,180 29 2,209 12 6,684 3,342 4,475 67 0.33 2,230 5 2,264 16 8 ,912 4 ,456 6,648 75 0.25 2,280 - 2,314 16 8,912 4,456 6,598 74 0.26 2,280 - 2,360 16 8,912 4,456 6,552 7 4 0.26 Whitechapel - Shoreditch 254 254 10 5 ,570 2 ,785 5 ,316 95 0.05 259 29 288 12 6,684 3,342 6,396 96 0.04 265 22 316 16 8 ,912 4 ,456 8,596 96 0.04 271 - 322 16 8,912 4,456 8,590 96 0.04 271 - 329 16 8,912 4,456 8,583 9 6 0.04

Docklands Light Railway - -

DLR Northbound Cutty sark - Islands gardens 2,767 2 ,767 23 12,150 6 ,075 9 ,383 77 0.23 2,864 936 3,800 23 12,150 6,075 8,350 69 0.31 2,961 1,153 5,050 23 1 2,150 6 ,075 7,100 58 0.42 3,058 962 6,109 23 12,150 6,075 6,041 50 0.50 3,058 961 5,620 23 12,150 6,075 6,530 5 4 0.46 Island gardens - Cross harbour 3,337 3 ,337 23 12,150 6 ,075 8 ,813 73 0.27 3,454 936 4,390 23 12,150 6,075 7,760 64 0.36 3,571 1,153 5,660 23 1 2,150 6 ,075 6,490 53 0.47 3,688 962 6,739 23 12,150 6,075 5,411 45 0.55 3,688 961 6,200 23 12,150 6,075 5,950 4 9 0.51 Cross harbour - Canary wharf 4,263 4 ,263 26 13,770 6 ,885 9 ,507 69 0.31 4,413 8 37 5 ,250 26 1 3,770 6 ,885 8,520 6 2 0.38 4 ,562 9 94 6,394 26 1 3,770 6 ,885 7 ,376 54 0 .46 4 ,712 9 60 7 ,503 26 13,770 6 ,885 6 ,267 46 0.54 4,712 9 52 6 ,903 2 6 13,770 6,885 6,867 5 0 0.50 Canary wharf - West India key 5,158 5 ,158 26 13,770 6 ,885 8 ,612 63 0.37 5,339 823 6,162 26 13,770 6,885 7,608 55 0.45 5,520 994 7,337 26 1 3,770 6 ,885 6,433 47 0.53 5,701 960 8,478 26 13,770 6,885 5,292 38 0.62 5,701 952 7,799 26 13,770 6,885 5,971 4 3 0.57

West India key - Westferry 3,071 3 ,071 17 9 ,180 4 ,590 6 ,109 67 0.33 3,178 467 3,645 17 9,180 4,590 5,535 60 0.40 3,286 622 4,374 17 6 ,120 3 ,060 1,746 29 0.71 3,394 172 4,654 17 6,120 3,060 1,466 24 0.76 3,394 166 4,282 17 6,120 3,060 1,838 3 0 0.70

West India key -Poplar 2,272 2 ,272 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 2 ,318 50 0.50 2,352 1 ,152 3 ,504 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 1,086 2 4 0.76 2 ,431 9 52 4,535 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 5 5 1 0 .99 2 ,511 9 02 5 ,517 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 - 9 27 - 20 1.20 2,511 8 95 5 ,075 9 4,590 2,295 - 485 - 1 1 1.11 Poplar - All saints 2,690 2 ,690 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 1 ,900 41 0.59 2,784 299 3,084 9 4,590 2,295 1,506 33 0.67 2,879 530 3,708 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 882 19 0.81 2,973 572 4,374 9 4,590 2,295 216 5 0.95 2,973 564 4,024 9 4,590 2,295 566 1 2 0.88 All saints - Devons road 1,317 1 ,317 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 3 ,273 71 0.29 1,363 330 1,693 9 4,590 2,295 2,897 63 0.37 1,409 530 2,270 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 2,320 51 0.49 1,455 572 2,888 9 4,590 2,295 1,702 37 0.63 1,455 564 2,657 9 4,590 2,295 1,933 4 2 0.58 Devons road - Bow church 893 893 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 3 ,697 81 0.19 924 445 1,369 9 4,590 2,295 3,221 70 0.30 955 504 1,904 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 2,686 59 0.41 986 596 2,532 9 4,590 2,295 2,058 45 0.55 986 584 2,329 9 4,590 2,295 2,261 4 9 0.51 Bow church - Pudding mill lane 423 423 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 4 ,167 91 0.09 438 501 939 9 4,590 2,295 3,651 80 0.20 453 513 1,467 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 3,123 68 0.32 468 596 2,078 9 4,590 2,295 2,512 55 0.45 468 584 1,911 9 4,590 2,295 2,679 5 8 0.42 Pudding mill lane - Stratford 460 460 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 4 ,130 90 0.10 476 501 978 9 4,590 2,295 3,612 79 0.21 492 513 1,506 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 3,084 67 0.33 509 596 2,119 9 4,590 2,295 2,471 54 0.46 509 584 1,949 9 4,590 2,295 2,641 5 8 0.42

Southbound Statford - Pudding mill lane 1,190 1 ,190 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 3 ,400 74 0.26 1,231 789 2,021 9 4,590 2,295 2,569 56 0.44 1,273 1,883 3,945 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 645 14 0.86 1,315 2,603 6,590 9 4,590 2,295 - 2,000 - 44 1.44 1,315 2,601 6,063 9 4,590 2,295 - 1,473 - 3 2 1.32 Pudding mill lane - Bow church 1,160 1 ,160 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 3 ,430 75 0.25 1,201 789 1,990 9 4,590 2,295 2,600 57 0.43 1,242 1,883 3,914 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 676 15 0.85 1,282 2,603 6,557 9 4,590 2,295 - 1,967 - 43 1.43 1,282 2,601 6,033 9 4,590 2,295 - 1,443 - 3 1 1.31 Bow church - Devons road 1,471 1 ,471 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 3 ,119 68 0.32 1,523 795 2,318 9 4,590 2,295 2,272 49 0.51 1,575 1,383 3,753 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 837 18 0.82 1,626 2,603 6,407 9 4,590 2,295 - 1,817 - 40 1.40 1,626 2,601 5,895 9 4,590 2,295 - 1,305 - 2 8 1.28 Devons road - All saints 1,531 1 ,531 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 3 ,059 67 0.33 1,585 745 2,330 9 4,590 2,295 2,260 49 0.51 1,638 640 3,023 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 1,567 34 0.66 1,692 2,526 5,603 9 4,590 2,295 - 1,013 - 22 1.22 1,692 2,524 5,155 9 4,590 2,295 - 565 - 1 2 1.12 All saints - Poplar 1,661 1 ,661 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 2 ,929 64 0.36 1,720 707 2,427 9 4,590 2,295 2,163 47 0.53 1,778 639 3,124 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 1,466 32 0.68 1,836 2,526 5,708 9 4,590 2,295 - 1,118 - 24 1.24 1,836 2,524 5,252 9 4,590 2,295 - 662 - 1 4 1.14 Poplar - West India key 1,516 1 ,516 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 3 ,074 67 0.33 1,569 1,419 2,988 9 4,590 2,295 1,602 35 0.65 1,622 2,196 5,237 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 - 647 - 14 1.14 1,675 1,536 6,826 9 4,590 2,295 - 2,236 - 49 1.49 1,675 1,526 6,280 9 4,590 2,295 - 1,690 - 3 7 1.37

Westferry - West India key 3,207 3 ,207 17 9 ,180 4 ,590 5 ,973 65 0.35 3,319 7 81 4 ,100 17 9 ,180 4 ,590 5,080 5 5 0.45 3 ,432 9 17 5,130 17 6 ,120 3 ,060 9 90 16 0 .84 3 ,544 6 47 5 ,889 17 9 ,180 4 ,590 3 ,291 36 0.64 3,544 6 45 5 ,418 1 7 9,180 4,590 3,762 4 1 0.59

West India key - Canary wharf 4,995 4 ,995 26 13,770 6 ,885 8 ,775 64 0.36 5,170 1,531 6,701 26 13,770 6,885 7,069 51 0.49 5,345 2,233 9,109 26 1 3,770 6 ,885 4,661 34 0.66 5,520 464 9,748 26 13,770 6,885 4,022 29 0.71 5,520 459 8,968 26 13,770 6,885 4,802 3 5 0.65 Canary wharf - Cross harbour 2,596 2 ,596 26 13,770 6 ,885 11,174 81 0.19 2,687 232 2,919 26 13,770 6,885 10,851 79 0.21 2,778 808 3,819 26 1 3,770 6 ,885 9,951 72 0.28 2,869 134 4,044 26 13,770 6,885 9,726 71 0.29 2,869 129 3,720 26 13,770 6,885 10,050 7 3 0.27 Cross harbour - Island gardens 1,674 1 ,674 23 12,150 6 ,075 10,476 86 0.14 1,733 212 1,945 23 12,150 6,075 10,205 84 0.16 1,792 281 2,285 23 1 2,150 6 ,075 9,865 81 0.19 1,850 134 2,477 23 12,150 6,075 9,673 80 0.20 1,850 129 2,279 23 12,150 6,075 9,871 8 1 0.19 Island gardens - Cutty sark 1,434 1 ,434 23 12,150 6 ,075 10,716 88 0.12 1,484 2 12 1,697 23 1 2,150 6 ,075 10,453 8 6 0.14 1 ,535 2 81 2,028 23 1 2,150 6 ,075 1 0,122 83 0 .17 1 ,585 1 34 2 ,212 23 12,150 6 ,075 9 ,938 82 0.18 1,585 1 29 2 ,035 2 3 12,150 6,075 10,115 8 3 0.17

Westbound Canning town - East India 1,818 1 ,818 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 5 ,094 74 0.26 1,882 681 2,563 13 6,912 3,456 4,349 63 0.37 1,945 776 3,403 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 3,509 51 0.49 2,009 2,520 5,986 13 6,912 3,456 926 13 0.87 2,009 2,518 5,507 13 6,912 3,456 1,405 2 0 0.80 East India - Blackwell 2,028 2 ,028 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 4 ,884 71 0.29 2,099 717 2,816 13 6,912 3,456 4,096 59 0.41 2,170 839 3,726 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 3,186 46 0.54 2,241 2,520 6,317 13 6,912 3,456 595 9 0.91 2,241 2,518 5,811 13 6,912 3,456 1,101 1 6 0.84 Blackwell - Poplar 2,121 2 ,121 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 4 ,791 69 0.31 2,195 702 2,897 13 6,912 3,456 4,015 58 0.42 2,270 818 3,789 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 3,123 45 0.55 2,344 2,523 6,387 13 6,912 3,456 525 8 0.92 2,344 2,521 5,876 13 6,912 3,456 1,036 1 5 0.85 Poplar - Westferry 1,721 1 ,721 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 5 ,191 75 0.25 1,781 264 2,045 13 6,912 3,456 4,867 70 0.30 1,841 343 2,448 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 4,464 65 0.35 1,902 60 2,569 13 6,912 3,456 4,343 63 0.37 1,902 56 2,363 13 6,912 3,456 4,549 6 6 0.34 Westferry - Limehouse 5,490 5 ,490 30 16,092 8 ,046 10,602 66 0.34 5,682 4 05 6,087 30 1 6,092 8 ,046 10,005 6 2 0.38 5 ,875 6 71 6,951 30 1 6,092 8 ,046 9 ,141 57 0 .43 6 ,067 3 08 7 ,452 30 16,092 8 ,046 8 ,640 54 0.46 6,067 3 02 6 ,856 3 0 16,092 8,046 9,236 5 7 0.43 Limehouse - Shadwell 4,834 4 ,834 30 16,092 8 ,046 11,258 70 0.30 5,003 435 5,439 30 16,092 8,046 10,653 66 0.34 5,173 652 6,261 30 1 6,092 8 ,046 9,831 61 0.39 5,342 308 6,738 30 16,092 8,046 9,354 58 0.42 5,342 302 6,199 30 16,092 8,046 9,893 6 1 0.39

Shadwell - Tower gateway 725 725 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 3 ,865 84 0.16 750 460 1,211 9 4,590 2,295 3,379 74 0.26 776 637 1,873 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 2,717 59 0.41 801 308 2,206 9 4,590 2,295 2,384 52 0.48 801 302 2,030 9 4,590 2,295 2,560 5 6 0.44

Shadwell - Bank 3,882 3 ,882 21 11,502 5 ,751 7 ,620 66 0.34 4,018 3 91 4,409 21 1 1,502 5 ,751 7,093 6 2 0.38 4 ,154 4 12 4,957 21 1 1,502 5 ,751 6 ,545 57 0 .43 4 ,290 3 08 5 ,401 21 11,502 5 ,751 6 ,101 53 0.47 4,290 3 02 4 ,969 2 1 11,502 5,751 6,533 5 7 0.43

Eastbound Bank - Shadwell 3,948 3 ,948 21 11,502 5 ,751 7 ,554 66 0.34 4,086 835 4,921 21 11,502 5,751 6,581 57 0.43 4,225 764 5,824 21 1 1,502 5 ,751 5,678 49 0.51 4,363 1,209 7,172 21 11,502 5,751 4,330 38 0.62 4,363 1,208 6,598 21 11,502 5,751 4,904 4 3 0.57

Tower gateway - Shadwell 876 876 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 3 ,714 81 0.19 907 858 1,765 9 4,590 2,295 2,825 62 0.38 938 813 2,609 9 4 ,590 2 ,295 1,981 43 0.57 968 1,209 3,849 9 4,590 2,295 741 16 0.84 968 1,208 3,541 9 4,590 2,295 1,049 2 3 0.77

Shadwell - Limehouse 4,992 4 ,992 30 16,092 8 ,046 11,100 69 0.31 5,167 855 6,022 30 16,092 8,046 10,070 63 0.37 5,342 653 6,850 30 1 6,092 8 ,046 9,242 57 0.43 5,517 1,209 8,234 30 16,092 8,046 7,858 49 0.51 5,517 1,208 7,575 30 16,092 8,046 8,517 5 3 0.47 Limehouse - Westferry 5,250 5 ,250 30 16,092 8 ,046 10,842 67 0.33 5,434 770 6,204 30 16,092 8,046 9,888 61 0.39 5,618 607 6,995 30 1 6,092 8 ,046 9,097 57 0.43 5,802 1,209 8,388 30 16,092 8,046 7,704 48 0.52 5,802 1,208 7,717 30 16,092 8,046 8,375 5 2 0.48 Westferry - Poplar 2,094 2 ,094 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 4 ,818 70 0.30 2,167 2 78 2,445 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 4,467 6 5 0.35 2 ,240 1 82 2,700 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 4 ,212 61 0 .39 2 ,314 1 95 2 ,968 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 3 ,944 57 0.43 2,314 1 94 2 ,731 1 3 6,912 3,456 4,181 6 0 0.40 Poplar - Blackwell 1,843 1 ,843 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 5 ,069 73 0.27 1,908 302 2,210 13 6,912 3,456 4,702 68 0.32 1,973 428 2,703 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 4,209 61 0.39 2,037 562 3,329 13 6,912 3,456 3,583 52 0.48 2,037 555 3,063 13 6,912 3,456 3,849 5 6 0.44 Blackwell - East india 1,690 1 ,690 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 5 ,222 76 0.24 1,749 279 2,027 13 6,912 3,456 4,885 71 0.29 1,808 384 2,471 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 4,441 64 0.36 1,867 563 3,093 13 6,912 3,456 3,819 55 0.45 1,867 555 2,845 13 6,912 3,456 4,067 5 9 0.41 East india - Canning town 1,527 1 ,527 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 5 ,385 78 0.22 1,581 295 1,876 13 6,912 3,456 5,036 73 0.27 1,634 406 2,336 13 6 ,912 3 ,456 4,576 66 0.34 1,688 563 2,952 13 6,912 3,456 3,960 57 0.43 1,688 555 2,716 13 6,912 3,456 4,196 6 1 0.39

Overland Railway - - 'One' Railway Westbound Stratford - Bethnal green 4,500 4 ,500 6 5 ,550 2 ,775 1 ,050 19 0.81 4,607 136 4,744 6 5,550 2,775 806 15 0.85 4,715 573 5,424 6 5 ,550 2 ,775 126 2 0.98 4,822 - 5,532 6 5,550 2,775 18 0 1.00 4,822 - 4,979 6 5,550 2,775 571 1 0 0.90

Cambridge heath - Bethnal green 4,500 4 ,500 6 5 ,550 2 ,775 1 ,050 19 0.81 4,607 186 4,793 6 5,550 2,775 757 14 0.86 4,715 221 5,121 6 5 ,550 2 ,775 429 8 0.92 4,822 91 5,320 6 5,550 2,775 230 4 0.96 4,822 76 4,788 6 5,550 2,775 762 1 4 0.86 Bethnal green - Shoreditch 4,500 4 ,500 6 5 ,550 2 ,775 1 ,050 19 0.81 4,607 298 4,906 6 5,550 2,775 644 12 0.88 4,715 347 5,361 6 5 ,550 2 ,775 189 3 0.97 4,822 91 5,559 6 5,550 2,775 - 9 - 0 1.00 4,822 76 5,003 6 5,550 2,775 547 1 0 0.90 Shoreditch - Liverpool street 4,500 4 ,500 6 5 ,550 2 ,775 1 ,050 19 0.81 4,607 320 4,928 6 5,550 2,775 622 11 0.89 4,715 435 5,470 6 5 ,550 2 ,775 80 1 0.99 4,822 91 5,668 6 5,550 2,775 - 118 - 2 1.02 4,822 76 5,101 6 5,550 2,775 449 8 0.92

Eastbound Liverpool street - Shoreditch 404 404 8 7 ,400 3 ,700 6 ,996 95 0.05 414 4 07 8 21 8 7 ,400 3 ,700 6,579 8 9 0.11 4 23 1 ,001 1 ,831 8 7 ,400 3 ,700 5 ,569 75 0 .25 4 33 8 1 ,849 8 7 ,400 3 ,700 5 ,551 75 0.25 433 7 1,664 8 7,400 3,700 5,736 7 8 0.22 Shoreditch - Bethnal green 404 404 8 7 ,400 3 ,700 6 ,996 95 0.05 414 140 554 8 7,400 3,700 6,846 93 0.07 423 1,009 1,573 8 7 ,400 3 ,700 5,827 79 0.21 433 8 1,591 8 7,400 3,700 5,809 79 0.21 433 7 1,432 8 7,400 3,700 5,968 8 1 0.19 Bethnal greeen - Cambridge heath 404 404 8 7 ,400 3 ,700 6 ,996 95 0.05 414 120 534 8 7,400 3,700 6,866 93 0.07 423 793 1,337 8 7 ,400 3 ,700 6,063 82 0.18 433 8 1,354 8 7,400 3,700 6,046 82 0.18 433 7 1,219 8 7,400 3,700 6,181 8 4 0.16

Bethnal green - Stratford 404 404 8 7 ,400 3 ,700 6 ,996 95 0.05 414 44 458 8 7,400 3,700 6,942 94 0.06 423 74 542 8 7 ,400 3 ,700 6,858 93 0.07 433 - 552 8 7,400 3,700 6,848 93 0.07 433 - 497 8 7,400 3,700 6,903 9 3 0.07 C2C Tower Hamlets AAPLDF - - Report Revision 01 Westbound West ham - Limehouse 12,000 12,220 16 8 ,960 4 ,480 - 3 ,260 - 36 1.36 12,287 220 12,507 16 8,960 4,480 - 3,547 - 40 1.40 12,573 494 13,288 16 8 ,960 4 ,480 - 4,328 - 48 1.48 12,860 - 13,575 16 8,960 4,480 - 4,615 - 52 1.52 12,860 - 8,823 16 8,960 4,480 137 2 0.98 Limehouse - Fenchurch street 12,000 12,214 16 8 ,960 4 ,480 - 3 ,254 - 36 1.36 12,287 2 14 1 2,500 16 8 ,960 4 ,480 - 3,540 - 4 0 1.40 1 2,573 4 33 1 3,219 16 8 ,960 4 ,480 - 4 ,259 - 48 1 .48 12,860 - 13,506 16 8 ,960 4 ,480 - 4 ,546 - 51 1.51 12,860 - 8 ,779 1 6 8,960 4,480 181 2 0.98 TowerEastbound HamFencletshurch st reetA - LiAPmehouse - Public Trans 253 port Rev 346iew 5 2 ,800 1 ,400 2 ,454 88 0.12 259 93 352 5 2,800 1,400 2,448 87 0.13 265 155 513 5 2 ,800 1 ,400 2,287 82 0.18 271 - 519 5 2,800 1,400 2,281 81 0.19 271 - 337 5 2,800 1,400 2,463 J une 8 8 2 0.1206 Limehouse - West ham 253 316 5 2 ,800 1 ,400 2 ,484 89 0.11 259 64 322 5 2,800 1,400 2,478 88 0.12 265 104 432 5 2 ,800 1 ,400 2,368 85 0.15 271 - 439 5 2,800 1,400 2,361 84 0.16 271 - 285 5 2,800 1,400 2,515 9 0 0.10

Crossrail Crossrail Westbound Stratford - Whitechapel Copyright © 17 ,7Buro00 12 Happo 18,000 9,00ld0 Li 30mite0 2 d 2 0006.98 Custom house - Isle of Dogs 9,600 12 18,000 9,000 8,400 4 7 0.53 Isle of Dogs - Whitechapel 9,300 12 18,000 9,000 8,700 4 8 0.52

Whitechapel - Liverpool street 25,200 24 36,000 18,000 10,800 3 0 0.70

Eastbound Liverpool street - Whitechapel 6, 750 2 4 36,000 18,000 29,250 8 1 0.19

Whitechapel - Isle of Dogs 5,600 12 18,000 9,000 12,400 6 9 0.31 Isle of Dogs - Custom house 1,200 12 18,000 9,000 16,800 9 3 0.07 Whitechapel - Stratford 2,650 24 26,400 13,200 23,750 9 0 0.10

Appendix F - Line Capacity and Crowding

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Buro Happold

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Appendix G - Comparisons of GFAs and Line loading/crowding with and without the inclusion of Windfall Housing

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006 Buro Happold

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006

Jfox Buro Happold Limited 17 Newman Street London W1T 1PD UK Telephone: +44 (0)20 7927 9700 Facsimile: +44 (0)870 787 4145 Email: [email protected]

Tower Hamlets AAPLDF Report Revision 01 Tower Hamlets AAP - Public Transport Review June 2006 Copyright © Buro Happold Limited 2006