Michigan Law Review Volume 98 Issue 1 1999 Caste, Class, and Equal Citizenship William E. Forbath University of Texas at Austin Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation William E. Forbath, Caste, Class, and Equal Citizenship, 98 MICH. L. REV. 1 (1999). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol98/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. CASTE, CLASS, AND EQUAL CITIZENSlllP William E. Forbath* INTRODUCTION There is a familiar egalitarian constitutional tradition and another we have largely forgotten. The familiar one springs from Brown v. Board of Education;1 its roots lie in the Reconstruction era. Court centered and countermajoritarian, it takes aim at caste and racial subor dination. The forgotten one also originated with Reconstruction, but it was a majoritarian tradition, addressing its arguments to lawmakers and citizens, not to courts. Aimed against harsh class inequalities, it cen tered on decent work and livelihoods, social provision, and a measure of economic independence and democracy. Borrowing a phrase from its ProgressiveEra proponents, I will call it the social citizenship tradition.2 My thesis is that the seemingly separate fates and flaws of these two egalitarian constitutional outlooks are joined.