DOCSLIB.ORG

Questions About Wind Power and Answers from Us

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Questions About Wind Power and Answers from Us Questions about wind power and answers from us Click on a question to see the answer What does the Energy Agreement 2016 mean? ................................................................... 3 What proposals did the Energy Commission make? ............................................................. 3 What environmental objectives did the Parliamentary Environmental Assessment Committee propose? ............................................................................................................. 4 What does the Paris agreement mean? ................................................................................ 5 What does the proposal for the EU Renewable Energy Directive 2020 – 2030 involve? ..... 6 What is the EU’s renewable energy target? .......................................................................... 7 What is EU 20-20-20? ............................................................................................................ 7 Does Sweden have an action plan for renewable energy? ................................................... 8 What are the planning and development goals? .................................................................. 8 What do TWh, GWh, MWh and kWh stand for? ................................................................... 9 What is the electricity certificate system? ............................................................................ 9 What does the electricity certificate cost – and who pays? ................................................ 10 Why does Sweden have an electricity certificate system and not an auction system? ...... 11 What did Control Station 2015 contain? ............................................................................. 11 What did Control Station 2017 contain? ............................................................................. 12 What is quota duty and what quota levels apply in the electricity certificate system? ..... 13 What is a surplus of electricity certificates – and what is over-expansion? ....................... 14 Why do we have an excess of electricity certificates? ........................................................ 15 Why should wind power be expanded? .............................................................................. 15 Will wind power replace nuclear power? ............................................................................ 16 Where do we source electricity when there is no wind? .................................................... 17 How efficient is a wind turbine? .......................................................................................... 17 What is the “power issue”? ................................................................................................. 18 How much power is needed and when does a power shortfall occur? .............................. 18 Do we need to increase regulating power capacity as wind power is expanded? ............. 20 How often do wind turbines produce electricity? ............................................................... 21 Is wind power profitable compared to other forms of electricity generation? .................. 21 What is the cost of investment, operation and maintenance? ........................................... 22 What is the income from electricity and electricity certificates? ........................................ 22 Is new wind power the cheapest form of energy? .............................................................. 23 How does technological development affect the profitability of investments already made? .................................................................................................................................. 24 Are the production costs the same in all countries? ........................................................... 24 How long will the electricity certificate system be needed? ............................................... 25 How many wind turbines will be built in Sweden? ............................................................. 25 What is PPA? ........................................................................................................................ 26 How much will be invested in Sweden? .............................................................................. 26 How does wind power contribute to reducing carbon dioxide emissions? ........................ 27 How does the expansion of wind power affect consumers’ electricity costs? ................... 27 How large are the subsidies for wind power and other forms of power? .......................... 28 How much time does it take for a wind turbine to produce the amount of energy used in its manufacture? .................................................................................................................. 28 How does wind power contribute to employment in Sweden? .......................................... 29 How much noise does a wind turbine generate? ................................................................ 29 What environmental impact does wind power have? ........................................................ 30 How are fish and other forms of marine life affected by wind power? .............................. 30 What are rare earth metals? ............................................................................................... 31 How are birds and bats affected by wind power? ............................................................... 31 How are people affected by wind turbine shadows? .......................................................... 32 Who is responsible if an accident occurs at a wind farm? .................................................. 33 What rules apply to access to wind farms during construction? ........................................ 33 How dangerous is ice throw?............................................................................................... 34 What is the Machinery Directive? ....................................................................................... 34 What is CE marking? ............................................................................................................ 35 What are the parts of a wind turbine? ................................................................................ 36 How do you get permission to build wind power? .............................................................. 37 How do you get planning permission for a smaller wind power facility? ........................... 37 How large a proportion of wind power projects are realised? ........................................... 38 What are good wind conditions and why are they important? .......................................... 38 What is the municipal veto? ................................................................................................ 38 Why is the species conservation regulation a problem for wind power? ........................... 40 What is the Armed Forces wind power prohibition? .......................................................... 40 Why do the Armed Forces say no to radar-based technology to control aircraft warning obstacle lights on wind turbines? ........................................................................................ 41 What does the Energy Agreement 2016 mean? The Energy Agreement 2016 is an agreement reached by five of the eight parties in the Swedish Parliament, the Riksdag (the Social Democrats, the Greens, the Moderates, the Centre Party and the Christian Democrats). The goal of the agreement is that Sweden will have 100% renewable electricity production by 2040 in relation to electricity consumption. Renewables will be expanded and will gradually replace nuclear power, and enable Sweden to be a long-term net exporter of electricity. The power tax on nuclear generation will be reduced, while renewable electricity generation will be limited to 18 Terawatt hours in the period 2020 to 2030. The electricity certificate system, the support system introduced in 2003 to increase the production of renewable electricity, is to be extended. Under the agreement hydropower tax on buildings will be adapted to other power types. To the top What proposals did the Energy Commission make? In March 2015, the government decided to appoint a commission, in the form of a parliamentary committee, to review energy policy. The mission of the Energy Commission was to provide the basis for a broad agreement on energy policy, focusing on the conditions for electricity supply after 2025-2030, according to the directive (dir. 2015: 25, Energy Policy Review). The Energy Commission’s Report was submitted in January 2017 The Energy Commission proposed that • The target for 2040 is 100 percent renewable electricity generation. This is a goal, not a deadline that prohibits nuclear power, nor does it involve closing down nuclear power through political decisions. • By 2030, Sweden will have 50 percent more efficient energy usage compared with 2005. The target is expressed in terms of energy supply in relation to gross domestic product (GDP). • Sweden should have a robust electrical system with high delivery reliability, low environmental impact and electricity at competitive prices. This will provide a long-term approach and clarity for market players and will generate new jobs and investment in Sweden. • Energy policy must be based on the fact that Sweden is closely linked with its neighbours in northern Europe and aims to find common solutions to challenges in the common electricity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wind Power Payback Assessment Scenarios
    ISRN LUTMDN/TMHP—07/5160—SE ISSN 0282-1990 Wind Power Payback Assessment Scenarios Kristin Backström & Elin Ersson Thesis for the Degree of Master of Science Division of Efficient Energy Engineering Department of Energy Sciences Faculty of Engineering Lund University P.O. Box 118 SE-221 00 Lund Sweden ISRN LUTMDN/TMHP—07/5160—SE ISSN 0282-1990 Wind Power Payback Assessment Scenarios Thesis for the Degree of Master of Science Division of Efficient Energy Systems Department of Energy Sciences Faculty of Engineering, LTH by Kristin Backström and Elin Ersson Environmental Engineering Supervisor Examiner Professor Lennart Thörnqvist Professor Svend Frederiksen © Kristin Backström and Elin Ersson 2008 ISRN LUTMDN/TMHP—07/5160—SE ISSN 0282-1990 Printed in Sweden Lund 2008 ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the energy flow for a Vestas V90, 3 MW wind turbine, and provides a proper consideration of all the important input energy values in all their complexity. An analysis of the Energy Payback Ratio (EPR) has been conducted, with special attention being paid to what happens when a wind turbine is placed in different environments (i.e. the open field vs. the forest), and what happens to these scenarios when recycling is applied to the energy balance. The results of the research demonstrate that the EPR values are highly dependent on the prerequisites chosen. It was found that the wind turbine placed in the open field had more favourable EPR values than the wind turbine in the forest, a result that is dependent upon the road being shorter and this scenario being placed closer to the existing electrical infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • 100% Renewable Electricity: a Roadmap to 2050 for Europe
    100% renewable electricity A roadmap to 2050 for Europe and North Africa Available online at: www.pwc.com/sustainability Acknowledgements This report was written by a team comprising individuals from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) and the European Climate Forum (ECF). During the development of the report, the authors were provided with information and comments from a wide range of individuals working in the renewable energy industry and other experts. These individuals are too numerous to mention, however the project team would like to thank all of them for their support and input throughout the writing of this report. Contents 1. Foreword 1 2. Executive summary 5 3. 2010 to 2050: Today’s situation, tomorrow’s vision 13 3.1. Electricity demand 15 3.2. Power grids 15 3.3. Electricity supply 18 3.4. Policy 26 3.5. Market 30 3.6. Costs 32 4. Getting there: The 2050 roadmap 39 4.1. The Europe - North Africa power market model 39 4.2. Roadmap planning horizons 41 4.3. Introducing the roadmap 43 4.4. Roadmap enabling area 1: Policy 46 4.5. Roadmap enabling area 2: Market structure 51 4.6. Roadmap enabling area 3: Investment and finance 54 4.7. Roadmap enabling area 4: Infrastructure 58 5. Opportunities and consequences 65 5.1. Security of supply 65 5.2. Costs 67 5.3. Environmental concerns 69 5.4. Sustainable development 70 5.5. Addressing the global climate problem 71 6. Conclusions and next steps 75 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Appendices Appendix 1: Acronyms and Glossary 79 Appendix 2: The 2050 roadmap in detail 83 Appendix 3: Cost calculations and assumptions 114 Appendix 4: Case studies 117 Appendix 5: Taking the roadmap forward – additional study areas 131 Appendix 6: References 133 Appendix 7: Contact information 138 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPP Chapter one: Foreword 1.
    [Show full text]
  • GWEC – Global Wind Report | Annual Market Update 2014
    GLOBAL WIND REPORT ANNUAL MARKET UPDATE 2014 Navigating the global wind power market The Global Wind Energy Council is the international trade association for the wind power industry – communicating the benefits of wind power to national governments, policy makers and international institutions. GWEC provides authoritative research and analysis on the wind power industry in more than 80 countries around the world. Keep up to date with the most recent market insights: Global Wind Statistics 2014 February 2015 Global Wind Report 2014 March 2015 Global Wind Energy Outlook 2014 October 2014 Offshore Wind Policy and Market Assessment – A Global Outlook February 2015 Our mission is to ensure that wind power establishes itself as the answer to today‘s energy challenges, providing substantial venvironmental and economic benefits. GWEC represents the industry with or at the UNFCCC, the IEA, international financial institutions, the IPCC and IRENA. GWEC – opening up the frontiers follow us on TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword. 4 Making the Commitment to Renewable Energy. 5 Global Status of Wind Power in 2014 . 6 Market Forecast for 2015 – 2019. 16 Green bonds offer exciting opportunities for the wind sector . .22 Emerging Africa . .26 Australia . .30 Brazil . 32 Canada. .34 Chile . .36 PR China . .38 Denmark . .42 The European Union . .44 France . .46 Germany. .48 Global offshore . 52 India . .58 Italy . .60 Japan . .62 Mexico . .64 Poland . .66 South Africa . .68 Sweden . 70 Turkey . 72 United Kingdom. 74 United States . 76 About GWEC . 78 GWEC – Global Wind 2014 Report 3 FOREWORD 014 was a great year for the wind industry, setting a The two big stories in 2014 and going forward continue 2new record of more than 51 GW installed in a single to be the precipitous drop in the price of oil, and growing year, bringing the global total close to 370 GW.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Wind Report Annual Market Update 2012 T Able of Contents
    GLOBAL WIND REPORT ANNUAL MARKET UPDATE 2012 T able of contents Local Content Requirements: Cost competitiveness vs. ‘green growth’? . 4 The Global Status of Wind Power in 2012 . 8 Market Forecast for 2013-2017 . 18 Australia . .24 Brazil . .26 Canada. .28 PR China . .30 Denmark . .34 European Union . .36 Germany. .38 Global offshore . .40 India . .44 Japan . .46 Mexico . .48 Pakistan . 50 Romania . 52 South Africa . 54 South Korea . 56 Sweden . .58 Turkey . 60 Ukraine . .62 United Kingdom. .64 United States . 66 About GWEC . 70 GWEC – Global Wind 2012 Report FOREWORD 2012 was full of surprises for the global wind industry. Most As the market broadens, however, we face new challenges, surprising, of course, was the astonishing 8.4 GW installed in or rather old challenges, but in new markets. Our special the United States during the fourth quarter, as well as the fact focus chapter looks at the impact of increasing local content that the US eked out China to regain the top spot among global requirements and trade restrictions in some of the most markets for the first time since 2009. This, in combination with promising new markets, and the consequences of that a very strong year in Europe, meant that the annual market trend for an industry which is still grappling with significant grew by about 10% to just under 45 GW, and the cumulative overcapacity and the downward pressure on turbine prices market growth of almost 19% means we ended 2012 with that result. 282.5 GW of wind power globally. For the first time in three years, the majority of installations were inside the OECD.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release from Vestas Wind Systems A/S Home Furnishing Giant IKEA Invests in 90 MW of Vestas Wind Power
    News release from Vestas Wind Systems A/S Aarhus, 27 June 2012 Page 1 of 2 Home furnishing giant IKEA invests in 90 MW of Vestas wind power Project of 30 V90-3.0 MW turbines is IKEA’s biggest investment in wind to date. The deal testifies that carbon conscious companies such as IKEA increasingly achieve their financial objectives while at the same time reducing their carbon footprint and securing a sustainable energy supply. Vestas has received an order for 30 units of the V90-3.0 MW wind turbine for the Glötesvålen project in the municipality of Härjedalen, Sweden. The order is placed by Swedish developer and long standing Vestas customer, O2. Delivery and installation of the turbines is scheduled to be completed in January 2015. Whereas O2 will be responsible for the development, construction and operation of the wind farm, it will be owned by Swedish home furnishing giant IKEA. The Glötesvålen project is IKEA’s largest, single investment in wind to date, bringing the company’s fleet of Vestas turbines to more than 115 MWs across Sweden, France, UK, and Denmark. It is IKEA’s goal to get all of its energy from renewable sources and the 30 Vestas turbines is a major step on that journey: When in operation in 2015, IKEA expects renewable energy to amount to 70-80 per cent of the Group’s global energy usage. In Sweden alone, the investment will make IKEA self-sufficient with electricity. Carbon conscious companies-segment is long-term focus area for Vestas The Glötesvålen project is yet another example of how carbon conscious companies are stepping up their active involvement in wind energy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-12-21 Eolus Annual Report 2017/2018
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017/2018 EOLUS VIND AB ANNUAL REPORT 2017/2018 EOLUS VIND AB ANNUAL REPORT Eolus Vind is a leading Nordic wind power developer. Eolus creates value at every level of project develop- ment, establishment and operation of renewable energy facilities. We offer attractive and competitive investment opportunities in the Nordic region, Baltic countries and the US to both local and international investors. Since the company’s inception in 1990, Eolus has been involved in the construction of more than 540 wind turbines with a capacity of nearly 930 MW. The Eolus Group currently has customer contracts for asset management services with an installed capacity of more than 400 MW. Eolus Vind AB has approximately 8,200 shareholders. Eolus’s Class B share is traded on Nasdaq Stockholm, Small Cap. Eolus Vind AB Box 95, SE-281 21 Hässleholm, Sweden Street address: Tredje Avenyen 3 Tel: +46 (0)10-199 88 00 E-mail: [email protected] www.eolusvind.com THE PAST YEAR SIGNIFICANT EVENTS DURING THE FISCAL YEAR 232 MW OF WIND POWER TO AQUILA CAPITAL In December 2017, Eolus signed an agreement with Aquila Capital regarding the divestment of Kråktorpet and Nylandsbergen wind farms, comprising 61 wind turbines and a total installed capacity of 232 MW. Kråktorpet will comprise 43 Vestas V136-3.8 MW wind turbines, and Nylandsbergen will comprise 18 Vestas V136-3.8 MW wind turbines. Both wind farms are scheduled KGAL RE-SELECTED EOLUS for handover to Aquila Capital in the second half of 2019. Eolus In December 2017, Eolus signed an agreement with the German will provide asset management services for both of the farms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Flexibility: the Value of Wind Energy with Hydropower
    Applied Energy 181 (2016) 210–223 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Applied Energy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apenergy The benefits of flexibility: The value of wind energy with hydropower q ⇑ Lion Hirth Neon Neue Energieökonomik GmbH (Neon), Germany Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (MCC), Germany Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Germany highlights We assess the market value of wind power in power systems with hydropower. When moving from 0% to 30% wind penetration, hydropower mitigates the value drop by a third. 1 MWh of electricity from wind is worth 18% more in Sweden than in Germany. Sensitivity analysis indicates high robustness. article info abstract Article history: Several studies have shown that the revenue of wind power generators on spot markets (‘‘market value”) Received 3 March 2016 diminishes with increasing deployment. This ‘‘value drop” is mostly observed in power markets that are Received in revised form 10 June 2016 dominated by thermal power plants, such as in Germany. This paper assesses the wind market value in Accepted 11 July 2016 power systems where hydroelectric stations with large reservoirs prevail, such as in Sweden. Due to their dispatch flexibility, such hydropower compensates for wind power output variability and thereby miti- gates the wind power value drop. The market value of electricity from wind declines with penetration in Keywords: both types of power systems, but it tends to decline at a slower rate if hydropower is present. This paper Wind power presents empirical evidence on the relevance of this effect derived from market data and numerical Hydropower System integration model results.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadmap 2040 Wind Power: Combating Climate Change and Improving Competitiveness
    Roadmap 2040 Wind power: combating climate change and improving competitiveness Photo: WPS Sweden AB Contents 1. Letter from the CEO 3 2. Summary 4 3. Sweden’s large-scale green industry 8 3.1 Long-term framework promote investments 8 3.2 Electrification – electricity in new areas of use 9 3.3 Environmental industry benefits 10 3.4 Increased export of renewables 11 4. What is needed to enable green investments? 12 4.1 Update the Swedish Environmental Code 13 and the agencies’ instructions 4.2 Simplify permitting processes for grid and environment 13 4.2.1 Drawn-out and complicated permitting processes 13 4.2.2 Grid connections – a limiting factor 14 4.2.3 How can the permit process become more efficient? 15 4.2.4 Repowering with simplified permitting processes 15 4.3 Revoke the provisions on the municipal veto 17 4.3.1 Property taxes to the municipality 17 4.4 Co-existence with other interests 18 4.4.1 The Armed Forces’ restricted areas 18 4.4.2 Strong species protection – but not on an 18 individual level 4.4.3 Wind power in reindeer pastures 19 4.5 Enable job opportunities across the whole country 19 4.5.1 Wind power technicians 20 4.6 Set off offshore wind power 20 5. A modern electricity system 23 5.1 How wind power contributes to a stable electricity system 24 5.1.1 Power adequacy: Power surplus gives great opportunities 24 5.1.2 Electrification and e-fuels as a way to meet the challenges 24 5.1.3 Frequency stability: can be kept through synthetic inertia, 24 batteries and inertia from other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Come Together—The Development of Swedish Energy Communities
    sustainability Article Come Together—The Development of Swedish Energy Communities Dick Magnusson 1,* and Jenny Palm 2 1 Department of Thematic Studies—Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden 2 The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected], Tel.: +46-13-285741 Received: 19 December 2018; Accepted: 13 February 2019; Published: 18 February 2019 Abstract: Community energy (CE) and grassroots innovations have been widely studied in recent years, especially in the UK, Germany, and the Netherlands, but very little focus has been placed on Sweden. This paper describes and analyses the development and present state of several types of community energy initiatives in Sweden. The methodology uses interviews, document studies, analysis of previous studies, and website analysis. The results show that fewer initiatives have been taken in Sweden than in other countries, but that even with a rather ‘hostile’ institutional setting CE has emerged as a phenomenon. Wind cooperatives are the most common form of initiative, with solar photovoltaics cooperatives and eco-villages also prominent. The various types of initiatives differ considerably, from well-organized wind cooperatives that have grown into professional organizations to small-scale hydroelectric power plants owned by a rural community. The initiatives may have modest impact on the energy transition in quantitative terms, but they are crucial in knowledge sharing and as inspirations for future initiatives. Keywords: community energy; grassroots innovations; energy cooperatives; Sweden 1. Introduction In the Energy Union package of 2015 the European Commission emphasized the citizens’ role for a clean energy transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadmap for a Renewable 2040
    100 percent renewable electricity by 2040 wind power: combating climate change and improving competitiveness Photo: WPS Sweden AB Contents 1. Letter from the CEO 3 2. Summary 4 3. Sweden’s large-scale green industry 8 3.1 Long-term framework promote investments 8 3.2 Electrification – electricity in new areas of use 9 3.3 Environmental industry benefits 10 3.4 Increased export of renewables 11 4. What is needed to enable green investments? 13 4.1 Update the Swedish Environmental Code and the agencies’ instructions 13 4.2 Simplify permitting processes for grid and environment 13 4.2.1 Drawn-out and complicated permitting processes 13 4.2.2 Grid connections – a limiting factor 13 4.2.3 How can the permit process become more efficient? 15 4.2.4 Repowering with simplified permitting processes 15 4.3 Revoke the provisions on the municipal veto 17 4.3.1 Property taxes to the municipality 17 4.4 Co-existence with other interests 18 4.4.1 The Armed Forces’ restricted areas 18 4.4.2 Strong species protection – but not on an individual level 18 4.4.3 Wind power in reindeer pastures 19 4.5 Enable job opportunities across the whole country 19 4.5.1 Wind power technicians 20 4.6 Set off offshore wind power 20 5. A modern electricity system 23 5.1 How wind power contributes to a stable electricity system 24 5.2 Reinforce the grid’s capacity 26 6. Final words 29 October 2019 Photo: Råbäcken, Svevind AB 2 1. Letter from the CEO As CEO of the Swedish Wind Energy Association, I am proud to reflect on the amazing journey that wind power has made in the ten years since we formed our organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Wind Power Planning and Policy: Experiences from the Nordic Countries
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Pettersson, Maria; Söderholm, Patrik Article Reforming Wind Power Planning and Policy: Experiences from the Nordic Countries CESifo DICE Report Provided in Cooperation with: Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Suggested Citation: Pettersson, Maria; Söderholm, Patrik (2011) : Reforming Wind Power Planning and Policy: Experiences from the Nordic Countries, CESifo DICE Report, ISSN 1613-6373, ifo Institut - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München, München, Vol. 09, Iss. 4, pp. 54-60 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/167061 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have
    [Show full text]
  • Scenarios and Time Series of Future Wind Power Production in Sweden
    SCENARIOS AND TIME SERIES OF FUTURE WIND POWER PRODUCTION IN SWEDEN REPORT 2015:141 WIND POWER Scenarios and time series of future wind power production in Sweden JON OLAUSON, HANS BERGSTRÖM AND MIKAEL BERGKVIST, UPPSALA UNIVERSITY ISBN 978-91-7673-141-3 | © 2015 ENERGIFORSK Energiforsk AB | Phone: 08-677 25 30 | E-mail: [email protected] | www.energiforsk.se SCENARIOS AND TIME SERIES OF FUTURE WIND POWER PRODUCTION IN SWEDEN Authors’ foreword This project was conducted within the Vindforsk IV framework by researchers from the department of engineering sciences (division of electricity) and department of earth sciences (meteorology) at Uppsala University. The project comprises three main tasks: 1. Meteorologically based model of hourly wind power production 2. Scenarios of future wind power deployment (geographical and technical) 3. Statistical model of intra-hourly fluctuations The first task built upon earlier work by two of the authors of this report. The second task relied heavily on interviews with knowledgeable persons in the Swedish wind community. The authors would like to express their gratitude for the valuable input from all interviewees. The project started in May 2014 and was concluded in May 2015. The reference group for this project has been: Jens Madsen, Vattenfall Tobias Nylander, Vattenfall Johanna Lakso, Energimyndigheten Erik Böhlmark, Svenska Kraftnät 3 SCENARIOS AND TIME SERIES OF FUTURE WIND POWER PRODUCTION IN SWEDEN Sammanfattning Omfattning och metodik i detta arbete sammanfattas nedan. Modell för timvis aggregerad vindkraftsproduktion Modellen baseras på information om individuella vindkraftverk samt data från den meteorologiska modellen MERRA. Eftersom modellen underskattade högfrekventa variationer i produktionen utvecklades en metod för kompensation av detta.
    [Show full text]