Election, Ethnicity and the Interpretation of Scripture in Romans 9 Robert Bruce Foster Marquette University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Election, Ethnicity and the Interpretation of Scripture in Romans 9 Robert Bruce Foster Marquette University Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Renaming Abraham's Children: Election, Ethnicity and the Interpretation of Scripture in Romans 9 Robert Bruce Foster Marquette University Recommended Citation Foster, Robert Bruce, "Renaming Abraham's Children: Election, Ethnicity and the Interpretation of Scripture in Romans 9" (2011). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 151. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/151 RENAMING ABRAHAM‘S CHILDREN: ELECTION, ETHNICITY, AND THE INTERPRETATION OF SCRIPTURE IN ROMANS 9 by Robert B. Foster, BA, MA A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin December 2011 ABSTRACT RENAMING ABRAHAM‘S CHILDREN: ELECTION, ETHNICITY, AND THE INTERPRETATION OF SCRIPTURE IN ROMANS 9 Robert B. Foster, BA, MA Marquette University, 2011 In this study, I attempt to reconstruct Paul‘s pre-epistolary exegesis of Genesis that I hypothesize lies beneath Rom 9. This exegesis goes beyond the discussion of the patriarchs in Rom 9:6-13 and supports the reconfiguration of God‘s family in Rom 9:24- 29. It enables Paul to view Israel as simultaneously chosen and rejected by God. Adopting a method from Carol Stockhausen, I offer several criteria to establish this project‘s legitimacy. The Pauline exegesis that I propose is plausible to the extent that (1) it is rooted in his text; (2) it is historically credible; (3) it illuminates the argument in Rom 9; and (4) it resolves difficulties elsewhere in Romans. Throughout his letters, Paul uses the stories of Abraham to create textual space in Genesis for Gentile believers in Christ. Outside of Romans, this results in an ethnically undifferentiated ―Israel of God‖ (Gal 6:16). In Rom 4, however, Jews and Gentiles constitute separate lines of descent within one Abrahamic family. In Rom 9, Paul resumes this mode of locating Gentiles among Abraham‘s children. The pentateuchal texts elucidating the election of the patriarchs (9:7, 9, 12) and the prophetic quotations vindicating God‘s inclusive call (9:25-29) are connected to each other by several links. If these are valid, then Hosea and Isaiah do not stand alone but extend and subvert the pattern of the chosen and rejected sons that Paul finds in Genesis. By juxtaposing texts from Torah and the Prophets, he creates separate genealogies yet intertwined destinies for Jewish and Gentile descendants of Abraham. I seek to substantiate this hypothesis by arguing for the following claims, each corresponding to a recognized exegetical problem. First, Paul reads Gentiles into Hosea by typologically identifying them with Abraham‘s excluded children. Second, Paul presumes that they will inherit Abraham‘s territorial promise. Third, Paul uses the Isaian texts that speak of a remnant to effect a division within Israel. Fourth, Paul derives his theology of the remnant from Genesis rather than Isaiah. Finally, Paul‘s mode of argument, which seems to make contrary statements concerning Israel‘s chosen status, reenacts the ironic narrative of patriarchal election. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Robert B. Foster, BA, MA The road which led me from my entry into doctoral work to the production of this dissertation has been long, circuitous, and filled with unexpected—and sometimes unpleasant—surprises. I could have never have made the journey without support from many people. I came to Marquette to study under Dr. Carol Stockhausen. I did not know that I was to have the unfortunate privilege of being among her final students. I was not particularly familiar with her work when I arrived, but I soon learned that she possesses a powerful capacity to expose the intricacies of ancient texts. Her ability to follow the logic of Paul‘s argument and trace its scriptural roots left me breathless. When she entered into semi-retirement, Marquette‘s loss became my fortune. It provided me with an unparalleled opportunity to pour over Pauline texts with her for hours in sessions that sometimes left me dazed. She became a model scholar, and I hope to honor her here not by repeating her own views, but by aspiring to hear Paul at work the way she did. When Dr. Stockhausen‘s health finally proved too great an obstacle for her continued involvement, the responsibility for overseeing this dissertation fell to Dr. Julian Hills. He was not content to push me through the finish line and be rid of an unexpected burden. To the contrary, he assumed and went far beyond an advisor‘s full obligations. His keen editorial skills delivered me—and the reader—from many stylistic infelicities and his academic professionalism had a salutary effect on my sometimes intemperate mode of expression. His admonition that I write in a prose that ―invites the reader into my argument‖ gave me an ideal to which I will aspire throughout my career. To put it succinctly, if in this study I have presented anything worth saying (and that is for the reader to decide), I owe it to Dr. Stockhausen. If I have produced anything worth reading (also a judgment for the reader to make), I owe it to Dr. Hills. If I have failed on either account (or both!), the fault lies solely with myself. A special word of thanks is due to my professors, especially those willing to serve on my dissertation board: Dr. Deirdre Dempsey, Fr. William Kurtz, Dr. Mickey Mattox, and Dr. Andrei Orlov. I truly appreciate their time offered as readers of this dissertation, as well as their guidance as professors, examiners, and mentors at an earlier stage of my studies. Several colleagues and teachers provided feedback on various chapters and sections: Mary Anderson, Raanan Eichler, Mark Johnson, Dr. Sharon Pace, and Dr. J. Brian Tucker. Their time, comments, and encouragement are greatly appreciated. Dr. Tucker in particular offered generous feedback on ch. 2, despite disagreement between us on fundamental issues. The Marquette University provided me with a generous three-year teaching assistantship and then a dissertation fellowship, making my studies possible. When I could not avail myself of the resources provided by the Marquette‘s Memorial Library, I was fortunate to have access to other venues. The G. H. Cachiaras Memorial Library at Crossroads College, formerly known as Minnesota Bible College, ii made their modest collection freely available to me for no reason other than the Christian charity of its librarians. The staff at the University of Michigan also kindly allowed me to borrow from their library, even after they should have cancelled my borrowing privileges when my wife finished her residency program there. I thank both institutions deeply. The longing for intellectual stimulation as I worked far from my teachers and colleagues was met in part by Dr. Gabriele Boccaccini, who allowed me to participate in two of his graduate seminars at the University of Michigan. Many friends in Milwaukee opened to me their homes and their tables. They made the long commutes and otherwise lonely visits to campus not only bearable but joyful. The following people provided childcare that enabled me to complete my degree, whether during coursework, exam preparation, or the writing of this dissertation: Stephania Dumbravanu, Angie Foster, Gloria Foster, Jerry Foster Sr., Jerry Foster, Helen Geary, Joshua Grilly, Joyce Ham, Connie Yody, and Amy Young. My mother-in-law Stephania left her home in Romania for months at a time to live in a country where she could not speak the language in order to ease the burdens of childcare. My mother Gloria sacrificed much, though she counted it all joy, to assist me and my wife in numerous ways. Without this help from friends and family, I would still be working on my final seminar papers. I have received persistent encouragement and unconditional love from my immediate and extended family throughout the time of my graduate work and beyond. Concerning the woman who provided me with unfailing support at every step, and without whom I would have quite literally fallen out of the program years ago (I refer to my wife Carmen, though Gale Prusinski, our departmental secretary, nearly fits that description!), I cannot provide an acknowledgement sufficient to discharge the debt I owe her. This dissertation does not addresses modern theological issues. It is my prayer, however, that God may use it in some way however modest to further the proclamation of his word and to edify his church. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................... i A NOTE ON TRANSLATIONS ................................................................................................... vi INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ vii CHAPTER I. STORY, TEXT, AND TECHNIQUE: READING SCRIPTURE IN PAUL ..........................................................................................1 1.1. PAUL‘S INTERPRETATION OF SCRIPUTRE: STORY ...................................1 1.2. PAUL‘S INTERPRETATION OF SCRIPTURE: TEXTS .................................14 1.3. PAUL‘S INTERPRETATION OF SCRIPTURE: METHOD .............................23 1.4. CONCLUSIONS..................................................................................................33 II. THE ABRAHAMIC MYTHOMOTEUR AND ISRAELITE IDENTITY IN THE LETTERS OF PAUL ..............................................................................36
Recommended publications
  • Volume 3 Summer 2012
    Volume 3 Summer 2012 . Academic Partners . Cover image Magnetic resonance image of the human brain showing colour-coded regions activated by smell stimulus. Editors Ulisses Barres de Almeida Max-Planck-Institut fuer Physik [email protected] Juan Rojo TH Unit, PH Division, CERN [email protected] [email protected] Academic Partners Fondazione CEUR Consortium Nova Universitas Copyright ©2012 by Associazione EURESIS The user may not modify, copy, reproduce, retransmit or otherwise distribute this publication and its contents (whether text, graphics or original research content), without express permission in writing from the Editors. Where the above content is directly or indirectly reproduced in an academic context, this must be acknowledge with the appropriate bibliographical citation. The opinions stated in the papers of the Euresis Journal are those of their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editors or the members of the Euresis Association or its sponsors. Euresis Journal (ISSN 2239-2742), a publication of Associazione Euresis, an Association for the Promotion of Scientific Endevour, Via Caduti di Marcinelle 2, 20134 Milano, Italia. www.euresisjournal.org Contact information: Email. [email protected] Tel.+39-022-1085-2225 Fax. +39-022-1085-2222 Graphic design and layout Lorenzo Morabito Technical Editor Davide PJ Caironi This document was created using LATEX 2" and X LE ATEX 2 . Letter from the Editors Dear reader, with this new issue we reach the third volume of Euresis Journal, an editorial ad- venture started one year ago with the scope of opening up a novel space of debate and encounter within the scientific and academic communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Essay for “Tevye”
    Tevye By J. Hoberman In summer 1939, actor-director Maurice Schwartz began work on his long-delayed “Tevye,” the film he first proposed in 1936 and had publicly announced in January 1938. Schwartz, who based his film on the stories of leading Yiddish author and playwright Sholom Aleichem, created and starred in a stage play of “Tevye” twenty years before. A $70,000 ex- travaganza, the film was produced by Harry Ziskin, co-owner of the largest kosher restaurant in the Times Square area. After three weeks of rehearsal on the stage of the Yiddish Art Theater, shooting began on a 130-acre potato farm near Jericho, Long Island. On August 23, midway through the shoot, Hitler seized Danzig. A Nazi invasion of Poland seemed imminent. Political tensions and the deterioration of the Euro- pean situation were felt on the set of “Tevye.” Many Maurice Schwartz as Tevye the Dairyman. of those involved in the production had family in Poland; some were anxious to return. Actor Leon contrast, “Fiddler on the Roof,” filmed by Norman Liebgold booked passage on a boat leaving for Jewison in 1973, emphasizes the generational gap Poland on August 31. But “Tevye” had fallen behind between Tevye and his daughters and ends with schedule – a number of scenes had been ruined Khave and her Gentile husband leaving for America due to the location’s proximity to Mitchell Airfield. along with Tevye. Although his visa had expired, Liebgold was com- pelled to postpone his departure. The next day, On one hand, Schwartz’s “Tevye” stands apart from the Nazis invaded Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • God Is Sovereign Notes
    Study Notes God Is Sovereign Romans 9:14-29 - Read Passage: epmkg.com/Romans9 ​ About Austin’s Study Notes This document contains information and resources Pastor Austin Rammell used to research and compile his weekly message. Resources are copyrighted by their respective authors and credited via footnotes. We encourage you to purchase the original resource materials to perform your own study. Notes THEODICY B: THE JUSTICE OF GOD (vv. 14–18) Again Paul anticipates his antagonists’ outcry and says it for them in verse 14: “What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all!” Or as Phillips renders it, “Do we conclude that God is monstrously unfair? Never!” At first it appears that Paul does not really answer the question but simply says it is impossible for God to do anything unjust. But the answer is sufficient. Luther comments, “Why, then should man complain that God acts unjustly, when this is impossible? Or, could it be possible that God is not God?” If we say God cannot be fair and be a God who elects, we show a faulty concept of God. If we think of God as an enlarged man, with human emotions and motives, how misled we are. God is infinite—we are finite. He knows all—our knowledge is incomplete and ephemeral. A. W. Tozer wrote: The Church has surrendered her once lofty concept of God and has substituted for it one so low, so ignoble, as to be utterly unworthy of thinking, worshiping men. This she has done not deliberately, but little by little and without her knowledge; and her very unawareness only makes her situation all the more tragic.
    [Show full text]
  • “Summer of Romans” Questions Romans 9 Esv
    “SUMMER OF ROMANS” QUESTIONS ROMANS 9 To prepare for CCP’s weekly Bible study, read the following passages and think through the questions below. ESV Romans 9:1 I am speaking the truth in Christ- I am not lying; my conscience bears me witness in the Holy Spirit- 2 that I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. 3 For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, my kinsmen according to the flesh. 4 They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises. 5 To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen. 1) What emotion does Paul have regarding Jewish people? Why do you think he feels this way? 2) Read Isaiah 53:6-8 and Galatians 3:13-14. How does Paul’s desire reflect the reality of Jesus’s experience? 3) According to verses 4-5, what properly belongs to the Israelites? 6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, 7 and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but "Through Isaac shall your offspring be named." 8 This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Submission Form
    Course Submission Form Instructions: All courses submitted for the Common Core must be liberal arts courses. Courses may be submitted for only one area of the Common Core. All courses must be 3 credits/3 hours unless the college is seeking a waiver for a 4-credit Math or Science course (after having secured approval for sufficient 3-credit/3-hour Math and Science courses). All standard governance procedures for course approval remain in place. College Kingsborough Community College Course Number Yiddish 30 Course Title Yiddish Literature in Translation l Department(s) Foreign Languages Discipline Language and Literature Subject Area Enter one Subject Area from the attached list. Yiddish Credits 3 Contact Hours 3 Pre-requisites English 12 Mode of Instruction Select only one: x In-person Hybrid Fully on-line Course Attribute Select from the following: Freshman Seminar Honors College Quantitative Reasoning Writing Intensive X Other (specify): Liberal Arts/ Gen Ed Catalogue Designed for non-Yiddish speaking students, course consideration is on the emergence of Yiddish writers in the Description modern world. Emphasis is on the main literary personalities and their major contributions. All readings and discussions in English. Syllabus Syllabus must be included with submission, 5 pages max Waivers for 4-credit Math and Science Courses All Common Core courses must be 3 credits and 3 hours. Waivers for 4-credit courses will only be accepted in the required areas of Mathematical and Quantitative Reasoning and Life and Physical Sciences. Such waivers will only be approved after a sufficient number of 3-credit/3-hour math and science courses are approved for these areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chapters of Romans
    Liberty University Scholars Crossing An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible A Guide to the Systematic Study of the Bible 5-2018 The Chapters of Romans Harold Willmington Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/outline_chapters_bible Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Willmington, Harold, "The Chapters of Romans" (2018). An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible. 58. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/outline_chapters_bible/58 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the A Guide to the Systematic Study of the Bible at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Romans SECTION OUTLINE ONE (ROMANS 1) Paul opens his letter to the Roman church by talking about God's anger with sin. The opening chapter may be thought of as a trial, where God is the judge and sinful humans are the accused. I. THE COURT RECORDER (1:1-17): Here Paul, author of Romans, provides his readers with some pretrial introductory material. A. His credentials (1:1, 5): Paul relates four facts about himself. 1. He is a servant of Jesus (1:1a). 2. He is an apostle (1:1b). 3. He has been set apart to preach the gospel (1:1c). 4. He is a missionary to the Gentiles (1:5). B. His Christ (1:2-4) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barbara Johnson Reader a John Hope Franklin Center Book the Barbara Johnson Reader the Surprise of Otherness
    The Barbara Johnson Reader A John Hope Franklin Center Book The Barbara Johnson Reader The Surprise of Otherness Barbara Johnson edited by melissa feuerstein bill johnson gonzález lili porten keja valens With an Introduction by judith butler and an Afterword by shoshana felman Duke University Press Durham and London 2014 © 2014 Duke University Press Afterword © 2014 Shoshana Felman All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ∞ Designed by April Leidig Typeset in Minion Pro by Westchester Publishing Services Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Barbara Johnson reader : the surprise of otherness / edited by Melissa Feuerstein, Bill Johnson Gonzalez, Lili Porten, and Keja Valens, with an introduction by Judith Butler and an afterword by Shoshana Felman. pages cm “A John Hope Franklin Center Book.” Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-0-8223-5419-2 (pbk : alk. paper) isbn 978-0-8223-5403-1 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Johnson, Barbara, 1947–2009. 2. Feminist literary criticism. I. Feuerstein, Melissa. II. Johnson Gonzalez, Bill, 1970– iii. Porten, Lili. IV. Valens, Keja, 1972– pn98.w64b37 2014 801.'95092—dc23 2013045003 Contents Ac know ledg ments vii Editors’ Preface xi Personhood and Other Objects: The Figural Dispute with Philosophy by Judith Butler xvii Barbara Johnson by Barbara Johnson xxvii part i | Reading Theory as Literature, Literature as Theory 1 The Critical Diff erence: BartheS/BalZac 3 2 Translator’s Introduction to Dissemination (abridged) 14 3 Poetry and Syntax:
    [Show full text]
  • Politics, Identity, Territory. the “Strength” and “Value” of Nation-State, the Weakness of Regional Challenge
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Trento : UNITN-eprints Politics, Identity, Territory. The “Strength” and “Value” of Nation-State, the Weakness of Regional Challenge Gaspare Nevola The post Cold War age reveals itself as being characterized mostly by the flourishing of “identity politics”. Identitary issues affect the public dimension of collective life and they often develop Politics, Identity, Territory. into economic, legal, political terms. There are many types of collective identity. We would clarify some of them in order to focus the analytical tools that are necessary to face the phenomena we The “Strength” and “Value” of Nation-State, are interested with: national and regional identities. Crucial in our argument are the concept of “political identity” and its “territorial” dimension. This concept and this dimension consent to the Weakness of Regional Challenge compare Nation-State and (sub-national) region as space of collective life, and their “authoritative” degree. According to this subject this essay will treat the following points: the return of identity Gaspare Nevola politics nowadays (section 1); the concept of collective identity (section 2); the many faces of collective identity (section 3); the relationship among politics, territory and identity, analyzed through the paradigmatic case of Nation-state and national identity (section 4); the structuring of political space between centre and peripheries, where we consider how the dominance of Nation- State model has to face persisting of territorial cleavages (section 5); the case of the regional issue (section 6); the “strength” and the “value” of Nation-State (sections 7 and 8).
    [Show full text]
  • Rereading Paul on Circumcision, Torah, and the Gentiles Asha K
    A Seal of Faith: Rereading Paul on Circumcision, Torah, and the Gentiles Asha K. Moorthy Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Asha K. Moorthy All rights reserved ABSTRACT A Seal of Faith: Rereading Paul on Circumcision, Torah, and the Gentiles Asha K. Moorthy It is generally held that the Apostle Paul dismissed the rite of circumcision for Gentiles. This dissertation, however, offers a different perspective. Through examination of relevant sources regarding the role of circumcision in conversion along with consideration of Philo of Alexandria’s depiction of Abraham as an exemplar of and for the proselyte, this project will suggest that Paul, in Rom 4:11‐ 12, uses the example of Abraham in order to explain the value of circumcision for Jews as well as for Gentiles. It will be argued, moreover, that Paul’s objections to circumcision, as found in Romans as well as in Galatians, Philippians, and 1 Corinthians, were not to the rite per se but rather to the notion that circumcision was necessary for entering the Abrahamic covenant, “becoming a Jew,” justification, salvation, spiritual transformation, protection or identity in Christ. A case will be made, moreover, that in Paul’s day there were two competing forms of circumcision and that Paul was opposed to the more radical procedure. Finally, divergences in Paul’s handling of the topic of circumcision in different letters will be explained through attention to particular audience concerns. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Hobsbawm 1990, 66. 2. Diamond 1998, 322–33. 3. Fairbank 1992, 44–45. 4. Fei Xiaotong 1989, 1–2. 5. Diamond 1998, 323, original emphasis. 6. Crossley 1999; Di Cosmo 1998; Purdue 2005a; Lavely and Wong 1998, 717. 7. Richards 2003, 112–47; Lattimore 1937; Pan Chia-lin and Taeuber 1952. 8. My usage of the term “geo-body” follows Thongchai 1994. 9. B. Anderson 1991, 86. 10. Purdue 2001, 304. 11. Dreyer 2006, 279–80; Fei Xiaotong 1981, 23–25. 12. Jiang Ping 1994, 16. 13. Morris-Suzuki 1998, 4; Duara 2003; Handler 1988, 6–9. 14. Duara 1995; Duara 2003. 15. Turner 1962, 3. 16. Adelman and Aron 1999, 816. 17. M. Anderson 1996, 4, Anderson’s italics. 18. Fitzgerald 1996a: 136. 19. Ibid., 107. 20. Tsu Jing 2005. 21. R. Wong 2006, 95. 22. Chatterjee (1986) was the first to theorize colonial nationalism as a “derivative discourse” of Western Orientalism. 23. Gladney 1994, 92–95; Harrell 1995a; Schein 2000. 24. Fei Xiaotong 1989, 1. 25. Cohen 1991, 114–25; Schwarcz 1986; Tu Wei-ming 1994. 26. Harrison 2000, 240–43, 83–85; Harrison 2001. 27. Harrison 2000, 83–85; Cohen 1991, 126. 186 • Notes 28. Duara 2003, 9–40. 29. See, for example, Lattimore 1940 and 1962; Forbes 1986; Goldstein 1989; Benson 1990; Lipman 1998; Millward 1998; Purdue 2005a; Mitter 2000; Atwood 2002; Tighe 2005; Reardon-Anderson 2005; Giersch 2006; Crossley, Siu, and Sutton 2006; Gladney 1991, 1994, and 1996; Harrell 1995a and 2001; Brown 1996 and 2004; Cheung Siu-woo 1995 and 2003; Schein 2000; Kulp 2000; Bulag 2002 and 2006; Rossabi 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Folk Literature
    Oral Tradition, 14/1 (1999): 140-274 Jewish Folk Literature Dan Ben-Amos For Batsheva Four interrelated qualities distinguish Jewish folk literature: (a) historical depth, (b) continuous interdependence between orality and literacy, (c) national dispersion, and (d) linguistic diversity. In spite of these diverging factors, the folklore of most Jewish communities clearly shares a number of features. The Jews, as a people, maintain a collective memory that extends well into the second millennium BCE. Although literacy undoubtedly figured in the preservation of the Jewish cultural heritage to a great extent, at each period it was complemented by orality. The reciprocal relations between the two thus enlarged the thematic, formal, and social bases of Jewish folklore. The dispersion of the Jews among the nations through forced exiles and natural migrations further expanded the themes and forms of their folklore. In most countries Jews developed new languages in which they spoke, performed, and later wrote down their folklore. As a people living in diaspora, Jews incorporated the folklore of other nations while simultaneously spreading their own internationally known themes among the same nations. Although this reciprocal process is basic to the transmission of folklore among all nations, it occurred more intensely among the Jews, even when they lived in antiquity in the Land of Israel. Consequently there is no single period, no single country, nor any single language that can claim to represent the authentic composite Jewish folklore. The earliest known periods of Jewish folklore are no more genuine, in fact, than the later periods, with the result that no specific Jewish ethnic group’s traditions can be considered more ancient or more JEWISH FOLK LITERATURE 141 authentic than those of any of the others.1 The Biblical and Post-Biblical Periods Folklore in the Hebrew Bible Descriptions of Storytelling and Singing The Hebrew Bible describes both the spontaneous and the institutionalized commemoration of historical events.
    [Show full text]
  • Male Circumcision in Contradiction to Human Rights? 30.11.2013 | Friedhelm Pieper
    Jewish-Christian Relations Insights and Issues in the ongoing Jewish-Christian Dialogue Male Circumcision in Contradiction to Human Rights? 30.11.2013 | Friedhelm Pieper Workshop paper, given at the ICCJ Conference, Aix-en-Provence, Tuesday, July 2, 2013. 1. Introduction As far as I know I was chosen for this presentation on the question “Does Male Circumcision stand in contradiction to Human Rights?”, because of a Landgericht court (“the Court”) ruling in Cologne, Germany, in May last year. - Now, decisions by a regional court normally do not attract international attention. But this one did. The court ruled that non-therapeutic circumcision of male children based solely on religious grounds has to be perceived as an unlawful bodily injury, and it is therefore a criminal offense. As you might have noticed in mid 2012, this Court ruling received wide range international attention and provoked intense debates. - I will begin this workshop with explaining some background on that Court decision and will present the core arguments of that Court ruling, which I will then discuss and comment from my perspective. 2. Cologne May 2012 A decision at first instance found no criminal offence however when the issue was subsequently dealt with by an (appellate) Landgericht court, that Court ‘ruled’ - as mentioned - that religious circumcision of male children has to be perceived as an unlawful bodily injury, and it is therefore a criminal offense under the German Criminal Code (“KPO’). This ruling of the Court was effective only in the area under its jurisdiction, but suddenly, male circumcision was put into question in all of the German-speaking countries and even led to a decision in a Swiss Hospital to suspend any medical procedures of this kind until clarification of the legal situation.
    [Show full text]