DOCSLIB.ORG

Select Committee Submission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Select Committee Submission Select Committee Submission Science and Technology Committee Inquiry – The Draft Spaceflight Bill Submission of Written Evidence from the Royal Aeronautical Society A. Observations/Recommendations The Draft Spaceflight Bill (DSB) sets out the legal and regulatory framework to enable safe and cost-effective access to space from UK spaceports, in order to create a safe, competitive and sustainable commercial spaceflight market, specifically encompassing satellite launch, sub-orbital flights and scientific experiments. 1. When passed into law, the DSB becomes the Spaceflight Act 2017: it will apply only to activities conducted in the UK and will restrict the application of the current legislation in force, the Outer Space Act 1986 (OSA), to activities conducted outside the UK1. Recommendation 1. It is important to clearly spell out the relationship/hierarchy between the Spaceflight Act 2017 and the Outer Space Act 1986 (the current legislation). 2. The OSA specifically addresses regulations regarding the prevention of the “contamination of outer space”, in compliance with the UN Outer Space Treaty2 but which are not presently included in the DSB. Recommendation 2. The current OSA regulations regarding the prevention of the “contamination of outer space” must be carried across into the Spaceflight Act 2017, and made applicable to UK-based spaceflight activities, in order to ensure compliance with the UN Outer Space Treaty. 3. The DSB does not appear to address the criteria for the design and performance envelope of a safe spacecraft. The OSA on the other hand makes reference to a set of comprehensive standards applicable to the design and the functioning of space vehicles, a) defined in the OSA Database of Standards 20103, and b) summarised in draft “traffic-light” regulations applicable to CubeSats4, neither of which are presently included in the DSB. Recommendation 3. The Outer Space Act Database of Standards 2010 should be revised to account for the draft “traffic-light” regulations applicable to CubeSats, and made applicable both to the Spaceflight Act 2017 and to the Outer Space Act 1986. 4. The DSB addresses the legislation necessary to regulate the establishment and operation of spaceports in the UK but appears not to address how to attract entrepreneurial launch operators. Recommendation 4. The Spaceflight Act 2017 must not only create the legislation necessary and sufficient to regulate the establishment and operation of spaceports in the UK but also to attract entrepreneurial launch operators from the UK and around the world to enhance the commercial benefits to the UK. 5. In the provisions related to Range5, the DSB does not explicitly address “controlled and uncontrolled airspace”, potentially leaving users unaware of their obligations. Recommendation 5. The Spaceflight Act 2017 should make explicit reference to the obligations related to “controlled and uncontrolled airspace” rather than just “airspace”. 1 See DSB Schedule 10 – Minor and Consequential Amendments 2 ST/SPACE/11 ISBN 92-1-100900-6 3 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/295764/dtbofstnds2010.pdf 4https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/447284/Draft_Cubesat_regulation_recom mendations.pdf 5 DSB Clauses 4, 5, and 6 1 | P a g e Select Committee Submission 6. While appearing to make little or no reference to the provision of oversight to ensure the spacecraft will be launched into the right orbit (the launch process) and remain there, the DSB identifies that powers with regard to Range6 will be assigned to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). However, the current CAA capability may potentially be insufficient to provide the full level of regulatory oversight across all areas. Appointment of more than one regulator, even for specific functions, might be appropriate for the task required, but the lines of responsibility should be made clear so that licence holders can easily navigate the regulatory landscape within their current understanding. Recommendation 6. In order to provide the necessary level of regulatory oversight for space activities and clarity to licence holders7, Government should consider whether to a) add space- related capabilities to the CAA, b) establish a new authority or c) appoint more than one regulator, each with specific domains of competence and clear lines of responsibility, and to reflect the decision in the Spaceflight Act 2017. 7. The DSB appears to suggest that the launch vehicles will be tracked (and if necessary, aborted) by means of ground-based range systems, without addressing the future role of Autonomous Flight Safety Systems (AFSS). Recommendation 7. Spaceflight Act 2017 regulations concerned with management of range control and range safety should take account of the future availability of certified Autonomous Flight Safety Systems (AFSS). 8. The DSB addresses the granting, terms, validity etc. of licences for spaceflight activities, but does not appear to elaborate the different nature of licences and the specific certifications required for spaceport operators, launch vehicle providers/operators and spacecraft providers/operators. Recommendation 8. The Spaceflight Act 20178 should clarify the differing nature and duration of licences for the different parties involved, and the need for certification (analogous with aircraft certification), for example specifically addressing: a) Manufacturer certification of launch vehicles and spacecraft9; b) Licencing of launch vehicle / spacecraft operators generally, potentially for a number of years; c) Licencing of each specific launch event within a defined launch window; d) Certification of the spaceport and licencing of the (infrastructure) operators, preferably for several years to ensure return on capital invested; and e) The need for spaceport operators to verify that spaceport users have the appropriate certification before commencing spaceflight activities 9. The DSB does not address the health, safety and environmental aspects related to on-site assembly, integration, maintenance and refurbishment of the launch vehicle and its payload (satellite), nor related to the storage and transport of launch vehicles, solid boosters and engine/thruster propellants, all of which are essential for the economic validity of the spaceport business model, but involve the handling of dangerous (essentially explosive) materials. 6 DSB Clauses 4, 5, and 6 7 DSB Clause 14 8 DSB Clauses 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 9 Also with regard to the provisions of the Outer Space Act Database of Standards 2010 2 | P a g e Select Committee Submission Recommendation 9. The Spaceflight Act 2017 should include provisions related to health and safety, environmental protection, local planning and any other significant issues associated with the following on-site activities: a) Manufacture/assembly/transportation/storage of launch vehicles, solid rocket boosters, payloads and satellites; b) Integration of payload/satellite onto the launch vehicle; c) Fuelling of the satellite and the launch vehicle; and d) Production/storage/transportation of engine/thruster propellants, their components and raw materials. 10. In the clause10 related to Criminal Law, the DSB does not address the case in which responsibility for UK- launched satellites and/or spacecraft is passed on (or sold) to a non-UK entity after being in space for some time. It would seem inappropriate for UK law to be applicable in such a case, and a burden on the UK Government (and the UK taxpayer). Recommendation 10. The Criminal Law Clause of the Spaceflight Act 2017 should address the situation in which UK-launched satellites and/or spacecraft are passed on (or sold) to a non-UK entity after being in space for some time. B. About the Royal Aeronautical Society (RAeS) The RAeS is the world's only professional body dedicated to the entire aerospace community. Established in 1866 to further the art, science and engineering of aeronautics, the Society has been at the forefront of developments in aerospace ever since. The Society seeks to: i. promote the highest possible standards in aerospace disciplines; ii. provide specialist information and act as a central forum for the exchange of ideas; and iii. play a leading role in influencing opinion on aerospace matters The RAeS Space Group11 is charged with promoting the interests of the Society and its members in astronautics and its component scientific and engineering disciplines. These interests cover the design and manufacture of spacecraft and launch vehicles, plus the application of space techniques in such varied fields as communications, navigation, planetary exploration, astronomy and remote sensing. The Space Group holds several conferences and lectures each year on exciting topics such as space tourism, spy satellites and robotic exploration of other planets. 24 March 2016 10 DSB Clause 48 11 For more information, visit: www.aerosociety.com/space 3 | P a g e .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SPACE RESEARCH in POLAND Report to COMMITTEE
    SPACE RESEARCH IN POLAND Report to COMMITTEE ON SPACE RESEARCH (COSPAR) 2020 Space Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences and The Committee on Space and Satellite Research PAS Report to COMMITTEE ON SPACE RESEARCH (COSPAR) ISBN 978-83-89439-04-8 First edition © Copyright by Space Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences and The Committee on Space and Satellite Research PAS Warsaw, 2020 Editor: Iwona Stanisławska, Aneta Popowska Report to COSPAR 2020 1 SATELLITE GEODESY Space Research in Poland 3 1. SATELLITE GEODESY Compiled by Mariusz Figurski, Grzegorz Nykiel, Paweł Wielgosz, and Anna Krypiak-Gregorczyk Introduction This part of the Polish National Report concerns research on Satellite Geodesy performed in Poland from 2018 to 2020. The activity of the Polish institutions in the field of satellite geodesy and navigation are focused on the several main fields: • global and regional GPS and SLR measurements in the frame of International GNSS Service (IGS), International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS), International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS), European Reference Frame Permanent Network (EPN), • Polish geodetic permanent network – ASG-EUPOS, • modeling of ionosphere and troposphere, • practical utilization of satellite methods in local geodetic applications, • geodynamic study, • metrological control of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) equipment, • use of gravimetric satellite missions, • application of GNSS in overland, maritime and air navigation, • multi-GNSS application in geodetic studies. Report
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-20-54A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 20-54 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Mitigation of Orbital Debris in the New Space Age ) IB Docket No. 18-313 ) REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: April 23, 2020 Released: April 24, 2020 By the Commission: Chairman Pai and Commissioners O’Rielly, Carr, and Starks issuing separate statements; Commissioner Rosenworcel concurring and issuing a statement. Comment Date: (45 days after date of publication in the Federal Register). Reply Comment Date: (75 days after date of publication in the Federal Register). TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................... 3 III. DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................................... 14 A. Regulatory Approach to Mitigation of Orbital Debris ................................................................... 15 1. FCC Statutory Authority Regarding Orbital Debris ................................................................ 15 2. Relationship with Other U.S. Government Activities ............................................................. 20 3. Economic Considerations .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Space Industry Bulletin July 2019
    VOLUME 2 • ISSUE 7 www.spaceindustrybulletin.com Space Industry Bulletin Market analysis and business intelligence for the space community Commercialising LEO will need destinations beyond the ISS ommercialisation of low investors. And it will depend on and a few private companies Earth orbit will require having destinations beyond just does not make a sustainable in - Cnew models for public- the International Space Station. frastructure. So how do we build private partnership, and it will be For almost two decades, the this community? built on a technology infras- ISS has been the sole hub for Kerry Timmons, LEO com - tructure that will include the commercialisation activities, pro - mercial programme manage - CONTENTS likes of robotics and machine viding unique access to research ment lead at Lockheed Martin learning. and development in a micro- Space, said: “It requires collab - Industry news 2 But commercial success will gravity environment. oration. It needs ‘old space’ and l Virgin Galactic to go public hinge on an infrastructure that Doug Comstock, deputy chief ‘new space’ working in partner - following merger “buys down the risk” for financial officer for integration ship. It needs the commercial l Launch of balloon marks the commercial partners and at NASA, said: “The ISS has 14 market to be energised to bring beginning of a new space era different facilities built by 11 dif - their money and ideas to space.” l Innovation loans offer a share of ferent companies. We don’t want When we talk about commer - £10m funding a gap in capability for human cialising LEO, it’s important to l Galileo outage helps build the access to LEO.” recognise that space is not the case for sovereign UK GNSS Along with destinations, suc - first frontier, and also that Earth l OneWeb takes sustainability into cessful commercialisation of LEO imagery is an industry success orbit and calls on the wider industry will depend on a community, story.
    [Show full text]
  • Sg423finalreport.Pdf
    Notice: The cosmic study or position paper that is the subject of this report was approved by the Board of Trustees of the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring or funding organizations. For more information about the International Academy of Astronautics, visit the IAA home page at www.iaaweb.org. Copyright 2019 by the International Academy of Astronautics. All rights reserved. The International Academy of Astronautics (IAA), an independent nongovernmental organization recognized by the United Nations, was founded in 1960. The purposes of the IAA are to foster the development of astronautics for peaceful purposes, to recognize individuals who have distinguished themselves in areas related to astronautics, and to provide a program through which the membership can contribute to international endeavours and cooperation in the advancement of aerospace activities. © International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) May 2019. This publication is protected by copyright. The information it contains cannot be reproduced without written authorization. Title: A Handbook for Post-Mission Disposal of Satellites Less Than 100 kg Editors: Darren McKnight and Rei Kawashima International Academy of Astronautics 6 rue Galilée, Po Box 1268-16, 75766 Paris Cedex 16, France www.iaaweb.org ISBN/EAN IAA : 978-2-917761-68-7 Cover Illustration: credit A Handbook for Post-Mission Disposal of Satellites
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 18-44 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Streamlining Licensing Procedures for ) IB Docket No. 18-86 Small Satellites ) ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: April 17, 2018 Released: April 17, 2018 By the Commission: Chairman Pai and Commissioners Clyburn, O’Rielly, Carr, and Rosenworcel issuing separate statements. Comment Date: (45 days after date of publication in the Federal Register). Reply Comment Date: (75 days after date of publication in the Federal Register). TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................................2 A. A New Era of Small Satellites ..........................................................................................................4 B. Current Authorization Approach for Small Satellites.....................................................................10 C. Small Satellite Frequency Use ........................................................................................................17 D. ITU Notification for Small Satellites..............................................................................................19 III. DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook for New Actors in Space Secure World Foundation
    H SECURE WORLD FOUNDATION ANDBOOK HANDBOOK FOR NEW ACTORS IN SPACE SECURE WORLD FOUNDATION Space is rapidly changing. Every year, more numerous F and more diverse actors embark on increasingly novel, innovative, and disruptive ventures in outer space. They are OR HANDBOOK FOR joining the more than 70 states, commercial companies, N and international organizations currently operating over 1,500 satellites in Earth orbit. EW A NEW ACTORS The prospects are bright; accessing and exploring outer space now require less capital investment, less time, and CTORS fewer people than ever before. However, this rapid pace of IN SPACE growth and change exists in a complex landscape of legal, regulatory, political, technical, and administrative issues. New actors in space face a steep learning curve and will I stress existing institutions and governance frameworks. N Additionally, the inherently difficult and fragile nature of S the space environment means that accidents or mistakes in PACE space might affect us all. In considering the great possibilities for growth and innovation, and in light of the myriad and interlinked challenges new space activities will confront, the Secure World Foundation offers this Handbook for New Actors in Space in the hopes that it will assist all aspiring new entrants—whether governmental or non-governmental— in planning and conducting space activities in a safe and sustainable manner. 2017 EDITION 2017 Edition ISBN 978-0-692-45413-8 90000> | 1 9 780692 454138 2 | Handbook for New Actors in Space Secure World Foundation Handbook for New Actors in Space Edited by Christopher D. Johnson Nothing contained in this book is to be considered as rendering legal advice for specific cases, and readers are responsible for obtaining such advice from their legal counsel.
    [Show full text]
  • Promotion for Development of National Space Legislation in Developing States to Ensure Global Space Governance
    10th UNITED NATIONS WORKSHOP ON SPACE LAW CONTRIBUTION OF SPACE LAW AND POLICY TO SPACE GOVERNENCE AND SPACE SECURITY IN THE 21st CENTURY 5-8 September 2016 Panel 5: Cooperation and capacity-building in space law and policy for the benefits of developing countries PROMOTION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL SPACE LEGISLATION IN DEVELOPING STATES TO ENSURE GLOBAL SPACE GOVERNANCE BY: Kuan-Wei Chen and Tanveer Ahmad©2016 A disclaimer… I am building on the works of Dr. Tanveer Ahmad. All mistakes, errors, and omissions (and nervousness) are mine. • This panel is about cooperation and capacity-building. “…appropriate legal and diplomatic mechanisms to promote cooperation in outer space will remain inaccessible to developing countries without specialists with thorough understanding of such mechanisms, and the building of institutional capacity at the national level”. • But this presentation is about the necessity of national space legislation. “…the possible ways to enhance the current frameworks of educational opportunities in space law for the ultimate purpose of developing national space policies and domestic regulatory frameworks”. RATIONALE FOR ADOPTION NATIONAL SPACE LAW Space law a very specialised field of law. Special understanding of and training in (capacity-building) international space law is needed to ensure: • 1) State complies with international obligations; • 2) national/private space activities conform to State’s international obligations ; • 3) legal certainty and predictable environment to foster national (commercial) space activities; • 4) framework for future developments, even if States not space-faring (yet). “Even if it was up to each State to determine how to assume its international responsibility for national space activities, certain regulations at the national level could be in the interest of the State itself”.
    [Show full text]
  • A Legal Framework for Outer Space Activities in Malaysia Tunku Intan Mainura Faculty of Law, University Teknologi Mara,40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
    International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) ||Volume||06||Issue||04||Pages||SH-2018-81-90||2018|| Website: www.ijsrm.in ISSN (e): 2321-3418 Index Copernicus value (2015): 57.47, (2016):93.67, DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v6i4.sh03 A Legal Framework for Outer Space Activities in Malaysia Tunku Intan Mainura Faculty of Law, university teknologi Mara,40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia Introduction 7 One common similarity that Malaysia has between and space education programme . In order for itself and the international space programme1 is the Malaysia to ensure that its activities under the year 1957. For Malaysia it was the year of programme of space science and technology can be Independence2 and for the international space effectively undertaken, Malaysia has built space infrastructures, which includes the national programme, the first satellite, Sputnik 1, was 8 launched to outer space by the Soviet Union observatory and remote sensing centres . Activities (USSR)3. That was 56 years ago. Today outer space under the space science and technology programme is familiar territory to states at large and Malaysia is includes the satellite technology activities. Under one of the players in this arena4. Although it has this activity, Malaysia has participated in it by been commented by some writers that ‘Malaysia having six satellites in orbit. Nevertheless, these can be considered as new in space activities, since satellites were not launched from Malaysia’s territory, as Malaysia does not have a launching its first satellite was only launched into orbit in 9 1997’5, nevertheless, it should be highlighted here facility .
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Issues Related to Registration of Space Objects and Transparency of Space Activities
    Acta Astronautica 143 (2018) 406–420 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro Critical issues related to registration of space objects and transparency of space activities Ram S. Jakhu a,*, Bhupendra Jasani b, Jonathan C. McDowell c a McGill-IASL, Montreal, Canada b King's College, London, UK c Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, USA1 ABSTRACT The main purpose of the 1975 Registration Convention is to achieve transparency in space activities and this objective is motivated by the belief that a mandatory registration system would assist in the identification of space objects launched into outer space. This would also consequently contribute to the application and development of international law governing the exploration and use of outer space. States Parties to the Convention furnish the required information to the United Nations' Register of Space Objects. However, the furnished information is often so general that it may not be as helpful in creating transparency as had been hoped by the drafters of the Convention. While registration of civil satellites has been furnished with some general details, till today, none of the Parties have described the objects as having military functions despite the fact that a large number of such objects do perform military functions as well. In some cases, the best they have done is to indicate that the space objects are for their defense establishments. Moreover, the number of registrations of space objects is declining. This paper addresses the challenges posed by the non-registration of space objects. Particularly, the paper provides some data about the registration and non-registration of satellites and the States that have and have not complied with their legal obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Kingdom's Outer Space Act 1986
    The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention 5(05): 4704-4709, 2018 DOI: 10.18535/ijsshi/v5i5.09 ICV 2015: 45.28 ISSN: 2349-2031 © 2018, THEIJSSHI Research Article The United Kingdom’s Outer Space Act 1986 Tunku Intan Mainura Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia Introduction objects the best features are provisions that specifically lay An ideal national space legislation of a state should contain down the information that is required for registering space provisions that reflect its conformity to the key international objects and provisions that also allow any person to inspect obligations as proclaimed by international customary law and the Register. In regard to the provisions on international advice by experts in space law. As such, an ideal national cooperation, the best feature is a provision that clearly state space legislation should contain the provisions that allow that states are required to encourage participants of space- states to authorise and supervise space activities that those related activities to forge international cooperation when they under states’ jurisdiction wish to undertake and to continue participate in space-related activities. As regards to the supervising the space activities that have been undertaken desirable characteristics of national space legislation, the best until they end (Authorisation and Supervision), provisions that desirable characteristics are national space legislation that is require states’ entities to be responsible towards the comprehensive in regulating space activities that is intended consequences of their activities (Responsibility and Liability), for, clearly identifies space policy objectives which conform provisions that require states to their register space objects to international obligations and national space legislation that within their national registry (Registration of Space Objects) provides a straightforward licensing regime1.
    [Show full text]
  • Schematic Overview of National Regulatory Frameworks for Space Activities
    A/AC.105/C.2/2014/CRP.5 17 March 2014 English only Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Legal Subcommittee Fifty-third session Vienna, 24 March-4 April 2014 Item 8 of the provisional agenda* National legislation relevant to the peaceful exploration and use of outer space Schematic overview of national regulatory frameworks for space activities Note by the Secretariat 1. At its fifty-second session, in 2013, the Legal Subcommittee of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space encouraged Member States to provide updates and inputs to the schematic overview of national regulatory frameworks for space activities (A/AC.105/1045, para. 92). 2. The Subcommittee also noted that future updates to the schematic overview would be published by the Secretariat in electronic form on the same web page. In that connection, the Subcommittee requested the Secretariat to provide it, at its fifty-third session, in 2014, with an updated schematic overview of national regulatory frameworks for space activities, including an electronic version for uploading to the above-mentioned web page (A/AC.105/1045, para. 93). 3. The present conference room paper contains a summary of the schematic overview of national regulatory frameworks for space activities. The full document, containing the summary and the complete schematic overview of national regulatory frameworks for space activities is contained on the following web page of the Secretariat: http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/en/SpaceLaw/national/schematic-overview.html __________________ * A/AC.105/C.2/L.292. V.14-01726 (E) *1401726* A/AC.105/C.2/2014/CRP.5 I.
    [Show full text]
  • COSPAR 2020A
    Northumbria Research Link Citation: Cheney, Thomas, Newman, Christopher, Olsson-francis, Karen, Steele, Scott, Pearson, Victoria and Lee, Simon Planetary Protection in the New Space Era: Science and Governance. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 7: 589817. ISSN 2296-987X Published by: UNSPECIFIED URL: This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://northumbria-test.eprints- hosting.org/id/eprint/55175/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/pol i cies.html This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies. To read and/or cite from the published version of the research, please visit the publisher’s website (a subscription may be
    [Show full text]