Status of the Ruddy-Headed Goose Chloephaga Rubidiceps (Aves, Anatidae): a Species in Serious Danger of Extinction in Fuego-Patagonia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 67: 341 -349, 1994 Status of the Ruddy-headed Goose Chloephaga rubidiceps (Aves, Anatidae): a species in serious danger of extinction in Fuego-Patagonia Status del Canquen (o Cauquen) colorado Chloephaga rubidiceps (Aves, Anatidae): una especie en grave peligro de extinci6n en Fuego-Patagonia FRANÇOIS VUILLEUMIER Department of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024, USA RESUMEN El status del Canquen (Chile) o Cauquen (Argentina) colorado Chloephaga rubidiceps (Aves, Anatidae ), es discutido sobre Ia base de observaciones llevadas a cabo en 1985-1988 y 1993 en Fuego-Patagonia chilena. Se observola especie durante un total de sólo 35 dfas (de los 103 dfas de terreno): 9 en el continente y 26 en Isla Grande de Tierra del Fuego. La especie no fue observada en Isla Navarino. Se registrola nidificacion en una sóla ocasion. Tambien se menciona una observacion de C. rubidiceps en Ia parte argentina de Tierra del Fuego y una en Neuquen, Patagonia argentina, fuera del rango normal de Ia especie. Se estima que el total de indivfduos avistados no superaba los 75. La distribucion y abundancia relativa de C. rubidiceps en Fuego-Patagonia en 1985-1988 y 1993 son comparadas con sus tres especies congenericas, C. picta, C. poliocephala y C. hybrida. Aunque distribuido en varios sectores de Fuego-Patagonia chilena, C. rubidiceps es sumamente raro en esta region, y su abundancia ha disminuido dnisticamente en las ultimas cuatro decadas. La poblacion total de Fuego- Patagonia chileno-argentina quizas no alcanza a algunos centenares de indivfduos. Se discuten las razones posibles de esta disminucion y se sugieren medidas para empezar Ia tarea urgente de conservacion de esta especie en peligro de extincion en America del Sur. Estas medidas incluyen Ia discontinuacion inmediata del status de C. rubidiceps como "plaga," ellistato inmediato de Ia especie en Ia lista "roja" de especies amenazadas de extincion, y una campafia de propaganda para sefialar a los residentes de Ia Patagonia Ia importancia de C. rubidiceps en los ecosistemas esteparias de su region. Palabras claves: Tierra del Fuego, Patagonia, Chile, Argentina, aves, Chloephaga rubidiceps, especie en peligro de extincion, conservacion. ABSTRACT The status of the Ruddy-headed Goose Chloephaga rubidiceps (Aves, Anatidae) is reviewed on the basis of observations in Chilean Fuego-Patagonia in 1985-1988 and 1993. The species was observed on a total of 35 days out of 103 field days: 9 on the continent and 26 on Isla Grande ofTierradel Fuego. The species was not seen on Navarino Island. Proof of breeding was obtained only once. Observations of C. rubidiceps in Argentine Tierra del Fuego in 1993 and in Neuquen, Argentine Patagonia, in 1992 outside the normal range of the species, are also cited. The total number of birds seen is estimated to be less than 75. The distribution and relative abundance of C. rubidiceps in Fuego-Patagonia in 1985-1988 and 1993 are compared with its three congeners C. picta, C. poliocephala, and C. hybrida. Although C. rubidiceps was found in several sectors of Chilean Fuego-Patagonia it is quite rare in this region, and its numbers have dramatically decreased in the last four decades. The total population in Chilean and Argentine Fuego-Patagonia may not exceed several hundred birds. The possible causes of this decline are discussed, and measures are suggested for the urgent job of conserving this species, which is in serious danger of becoming extinct in South America. These measures include immediate removal of C. rubidiceps from the list of pest (plaga) species and its placement on the endangered list, and a campaign to advertise the plight of the species and to indicate to residents of Patagonia the importance of the species in the steppe ecosystem of their region. Key words: Tierra del Fuego, Patagonia, Chile, Argentina, birds, Chloeplzaga rubidiceps, endangered species, conservation. INTRODUCTION spend the austral winter on the Argentine pampas, but the Falkland population is The Ruddy-headed Goose Chloephaga resident (Delacour 1954: 214-216, Meyer rubidiceps (Anatidae) breeds only in de Schauensee 1966:39, Woods 1988: 138- Chilean and Argentine Fuego-Patagonia 139, Madge & Burn 1988: 176). (Patagonian mainland and Tierra del Fue- Together with four other species (C. pi eta go, southernmost South America) and the and C. hybrida, both in southern South Falkland (Malvinas) Islands. The South America and the Falklands; C. poliocephala, American population migrates north to southern South America; and C. (Recibido el 20 de octubre de 1993; aceptado el 21 de junio de 1994) 342 VUILLEUMIER melanoptera, Andes), C. rubidiceps is part del Fuego, Chile. Tierra del Fuego, Argen- of a little studied adaptive radiation of tina, northward in winter to Buenos Aires. goose-like shelducks (Tadornini) endemic Extralimital range: Falkland Islands." to the Andes and Patagonia. Whereas Venegas & Jory (1979: 68) gave infor- Chloephaga rubidiceps, C. picta, C. mation for Chile: "Se encuentra en vegas poliocephala, and C. melanoptera occur in esteparias y matorral en Tierra del Fuego, grasslands and shrubsteppes, C. hybrida Magallanes centro-oriental y Ultima Es- lives in the kelp-covered, rocky intertidal peranza," and Clark (1986: 96) mentioned zone along the Pacific coast of southern northern and occasionally the east coast of South America, southward to the Tierra del Isla Grande and northwestern Navarino Fuego and Cape Horn Archipelagos Island. In the Falkland (Malvinas) Islands, (Murphy 1936: 942-947). it occurs mostly on "coastal slopes" (Woods Formerly abundant in its restricted South 1988: 138). Fjeldså& Krabbe (1990: 120) American range (Crawshay 1907: 99-100, mapped the breeding distribution in Fuego- Olrog 1948:470, Scott 1954:59, Humphrey Patagonia and the Falklands, and the et al. 1970: 112), Chloephaga rubidiceps migratory and wintering range of the South has declined dramatically in the last four American population in Argentine decades. For example, Jehl & Rumboll Patagonia north to Buenos Aires Province. (1976: 146) wrote: "This species is clearly on the verge of extirpation", Rum boll (1975: 315) sounded the alarm, and Fjeld sa Status & Krabbe ( 1990: 120) called it "a vanishing species." Still common in the Falklands, C. Crawshay (1907: 100) wrote that rubidiceps has decreased numerically on Chloephaga rubidiceps had recently those islands as well (Woods 1988: 138). increased in numbers in Tierra del Fuego:: Although Collar & Andrew (1988: 19) "A few years ago, the sheepmen tell me, included this species in their list of these Geese did not exist in anything threatened species, Collar et al. ( 1993) did approaching their present numbers: a yearly not include it in their list of threatened increase has been remarkable in their species of the Americas. immigration which is attributed to the In this paper, I summarize the distribution brushwood being eaten away by sheep, and and status of Chloephaga rubidiceps and the growth of fine grass." About forty years report my observations in Chilean Fuego- later, Olrog (1948: 4 70) reported "Gran des Patagonia in 1985-1988 and 1993, and one bandadas de centenares de aves" [italics observation from Argentine Tierra del mine] near Estancia Viamonte and Puerto Fuego (1993) and one from Neuquen, Ar- Rfo Grande, and Ripley (1950: 4) reported gentina (1992). I conclude that this species the species as "the second most common is at serious risk of extinction and make species in the area [of Rfo Grande]." suggestions for conservation measures that According to Scott ( 1954: 59) C. rubidiceps should be taken immediately if this species was "the commonest goose round the farms is to survive in the future. in the open pampa of the northern part of the island [of Tierra del Fuego]." At Estan- cia Marfa Behety Scott ( 1954: 59) estimated DISTRIBUTION AND STATUS OF CHLOEPHAGA that 25% or 7 5 individuals out of a flock of RUBIDICEPS 300 Chloephaga spp. were C. rubidiceps, and at Caleta J osefina he saw "masses of Distribution Ruddy heads [C. rubidiceps] ."Philippi et al. (1954: 26) also noted that at Caleta Josefina Delacour (19 54: 215) wrote that the it breeds "en gran numero," but, somewhat distribution of Chloephaga rubidiceps was at odds with the reports of abundance cited "still imperfectly understood" and Meyer above, stated that on Isla Grande it breeds de Schauensee (1966: 39) summarized it as "en numero reducido." According to follows: "Southern Magallanes and Tierra Johnson (1965: 18 7), their numbers "attain STATUS OF CHLOEPHAGA RUBIDICEPS 343 countless thousands" [italics mine] in Tie- 150,000 in 1972-1973 (Weller 1975). rra del Fuego. Johansen (1966: 229) Although it is not known how many eggs of indicated that C. rubidiceps was especially C. rubidiceps were destroyed during such common (haiifig) in the eastern part of attempts at eradication of C. picta, Weller Tierra del Fuego. Humphrey et al. (1970: (1975) believed that many eggs of C. 112) wrote "This common species [my rubidiceps were taken at the same time. italics] is found in summer on the northern, Recent reports indicate that in Chilean nonforested part of Isla Grande." Fuego-Patagonia Chloephaga rubidiceps Clearly Chloephaga rubidiceps used to "No es extremadamente comun aunque a be common but is now quite rare in South menudo su presencia es inadvertida entre America (see below and next section). bandadas de Ch. picta" (Venegas & Jory Although "still common"