For a Decade, a Considerable Number of Physicists Have Started Applying

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

For a Decade, a Considerable Number of Physicists Have Started Applying (Work in progress) Econophysics and Levy Processes: Statistical implications for financial economics Christophe Schinckus1 CIRST University of Quebec at Montreal (UQAM) Abstract This paper deals with the use of Levy processes in financial economics. More precisely, I will emphasize theoretical features of Levy processes that could be in opposition with a plausible empirical approach. Indeed, despite these processes better fit to the financial data, some of their statistical properties can raise several theoretical problems in order to use them in empirical studies. Econophysicists developed more sophisticated Levy processes allowing to have a statistical tools in line with a plausible physically (empirical) analysis. This paper presented all these oppositions between mathematical characteristics of Levy processes and their empirical needs. This paper also deals with the future of financial economics since by (re)introducing, econophysicists provide a broader definition of financial uncertainty. 1 E-Mail: [email protected] Christophe Schinckus CIRST - University of Quebec at Montreal 100 Sherbrooke Ouest (West) Montréal, QC, H2X 3P2 Canada Tel : 001 – (514) 843-2015 Fax : 001 - (514) 843-2160 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Gigel Bucsa for his helpful comments. I wish to acknowledge the financial support of this research provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 1 I. Introduction Financial economics is mainly characterized by a high level of mathematization in the modelling of stock market returns. Modelling stock market returns or stock market price variations is the first step in the development of financial models. Because these mathematical models require a statistical characterization of changes in price or returns, the work of determining the statistical distribution of returns is a key problem in financial economics and, more generally, in the work of modern financial theory. In this perspective, financial economists mainly use the Gaussian framework in order to characterize the evolution of financial prices. Three reasons can be mentioned to explain the success of this framework: the simplicity (only two parameters are needed to describe data), the notion of normality (that can refer to the key concept of economic equilibrium) and above all, the statistical justification which refers to the Central-Limit Theorem (CLT) with its notion of asymptotic convergence. For a decade, a considerable number of physicists have started to apply concepts coming from physics to understand economics and financial phenomena in a more empiricist perspective. According to econophysicists real data are far away from the asymptote and from the Gaussian framework. Econophysicists claim that the real world is not Gaussian. That is the reason why they have decided to use models that they consider more descriptive. All potential instabilities observed in the complex system must be taken into account in the econophysical approach. In this perspective, econophysicists try to explain the no-Gaussian distribution (i.e with leptokurticity) of financial distributions implying that extreme events have a significant probability of occurring. Leptokurticity has generated a lot of debates in finance. Several authors tried to describe financial distributions in a non strictly Gaussian framework. In order to describe leptokurticity of financial distributions, financial economists used normal distribution whose large variations were simulated through "jumps processes". Such processes are a combination of two (or more) different kinds of distribution, usually a normal distribution combined with a Poisson law. Until recently, the finance literature focuses only on these two examples of Levy processes2: the Brownian (normal) motion developed by Black and Scholes (1973) and the compound Poisson 2 See, for example, Beckers (1981) or Ball and Torous (1983) 2 process introduced by Merton (1976). Let us mention that the continuous process used by Black and Scholes (1973) implicitly assumed the dynamic completeness of market. This theoretical link between completeness of market and the continuous processes has been developed by Harrison and Kreps (1979) and Harrison and Pliska (1981). In this perspective, the compound Poisson process cannot describe complete markets in a perspective defined by Arrow and Debreu (1954)3. For the 1990s, financial economists have progressively began to study other Levy processes4 like Variance Gamma Process (Madan, 1990), Generalized Hyperbolic Process (Eberlein, 1995) or CGMY process (Carr and al., 2000). However, all these processes do not present continuous properties in order to be applied in situations of complete market (Naik and Lee, 1990). The consequences of this property are very important since they refer to the possibility to have a unique price for each asset. If markets are not complete, prices can only be evaluated through an interval. In this perspective, the statistical properties of stable Levy processes are very interesting since they can describe the leptokurticity of financial markets and they are continuous processes (implying the uniqueness of prices). In line with these works, econophycisists propose to use stable Levy processes in order to better describe leptokurticity of financial distributions. As I will show in this paper, the statistical features of Lévy processes are not really adapted for describing empirical systems. For example, Levy processes have an infinite variance. However the notion of variance often refers to the temperature in statistical physics (Gupta and Campanha, 1999). Therefore, if physicists want to use Levy processes to describe real systems, they have to find a way of computing variance. I will deepen this point in the paper and I will illustrate other statistical features of Levy processes that could be in opposition with a plausible physically approach. In other words, this paper analyses the possibility to use Levy processes in finance and it emphasizes all the opposition between their statistical characteristics of and the empirical needs of econophysicists. I will show then how econophysicists arrive to escape from the asymptotic argument of CLT by transforming Levy processes in a more empirical tool. All these responses given by econophysicists to apply Levy processes in a more physically analysis will be studied from a financial point of view. More precisely, I will present the consequences for financial economics of these statistical and all transformations proposed by econophysics. 3 More precisely, Harrinson and Kreps (1979) and Harrison and Pliska (1981) showed how a process must be continuous in order to have the unicity of the martingal computing the financial price.. 4 See Miyahara (2005) for a detailed presentation of the application of these processes in finance. 3 I. Econophysics or complexity applied to economic phenomena For a decade, a considerable number of physicists have started to apply concepts coming from physics to understand economics phenomena. The term “Econophysics” is now mainly used to describe these works. Econophysics, as a specific label and conceptual practice, was first coined by the physicist H. Eugene Stanley in 1996 in a paper published in Physica A (Stanley and al., 1996) As the name suggests, econophysics presents itself as a hybrid discipline which can be defined in methodological terms as “a quantitative approach using ideas, models, conceptual and computational methods of statistical physics” applied to economic and financial phenomena (Burda, Jurkiewicz and Nowak, 2003, p.1). The influence of physics on economics is nothing new. A number of writers have studied the “physical attraction” exerted by economists on physics (Mirowski, 1989, Ingrao and Israel 1990 or Shabas 1990). But as McCauley points out (2004), in spite of these theoretical and historical links between physics and economics, econophysics represents a fundamentally new approach that differs from preceding influences (Schinckus, 2010b). Its practitioners are not economists taking their inspiration from the work of physicists to develop their discipline, as has been seen repeatedly in the history of economics. This time, it is physicists that are going beyond the boundaries of their discipline, studying various problems thrown up by social sciences in the light of their methods. Econophysicists are not attempting to integrate physics concepts into economics as it exists today, but are rather seeking to ignore, even to deny this discipline in an endeavour to replace the theoretical framework that currently dominates it with a new framework derived directly from statistical physics5 (Gingras and Schinckus, 2010). Econophysicists present their field of research as a new way of thinking about the economic and financial systems through the “lenses” of physics. Since econophysics is a very new field, it mainly focuses on financial economics even if some works exist about macroeconomics6. As 5 During past decades, a lot of physics models have been used in economics but these models were mainly used for their mathematical description of physical phenomena. Progressively, these imported models have been integrated in the mainstream (see Black & Scholes model, for example). This trend is not observed with econophysics in which economic phenomena are explained in terms of molecular mechanisms or complex interactions. In this perspective, econophysicists do not try to connect their works with the pre- existing economic theory.
Recommended publications
  • General Background on Nigerian Financial System and Stock Market (Nsm)
    Stochastic modelling in Financial markets: case study of the Nigerian Stock Market OMAR, Mahmoud Abdulsalam Taib Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/16847/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/16847/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. Sheffield Haiiam University Learning and Information Services Adsetts Centre, City Campus Sheffield S1 1WO 102 078 532 2 •'laid Hallam University ,-,g and Information Services Adsetts Centre, City Campus Sheffield SI 1WD REFERENCE Stochastic Modelling in Financial Markets: Case Study of the Nigerian Stock Market Mahmoud Abdulsalam Taib Omar A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2012 DECLARATION I certify that the substance of this thesis has not been already submitted for any degree and is not currently being submitted for any other degree. I also certify that to the best of my knowledge any assistance received in preparing this thesis, and all sources used, have been acknowledged and referenced in this
    [Show full text]
  • Econophysics: a Brief Review of Historical Development, Present Status and Future Trends
    1 Econophysics: A Brief Review of Historical Development, Present Status and Future Trends. B.G.Sharma Sadhana Agrawal Department of Physics and Computer Science, Department of Physics Govt. Science College Raipur. (India) NIT Raipur. (India) [email protected] [email protected] Malti Sharma WQ-1, Govt. Science College Raipur. (India) [email protected] D.P.Bisen SOS in Physics, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur. (India) [email protected] Ravi Sharma Devendra Nagar Girls College Raipur. (India) [email protected] Abstract: The conventional economic 1. Introduction: approaches explore very little about the dynamics of the economic systems. Since such How is the stock market like the cosmos systems consist of a large number of agents or like the nucleus of an atom? To a interacting nonlinearly they exhibit the conservative physicist, or to an economist, properties of a complex system. Therefore the the question sounds like a joke. It is no tools of statistical physics and nonlinear laughing matter, however, for dynamics has been proved to be very useful Econophysicists seeking to plant their flag in the underlying dynamics of the system. In the field of economics. In the past few years, this paper we introduce the concept of the these trespassers have borrowed ideas from multidisciplinary field of econophysics, a quantum mechanics, string theory, and other neologism that denotes the activities of accomplishments of physics in an attempt to Physicists who are working on economic explore the divine undiscovered laws of problems to test a variety of new conceptual finance. They are already tallying what they approaches deriving from the physical science say are important gains.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Econophysics a New Discipline? the Neopositivist Argument
    Physica A 389 (2010) 3814–3821 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physica A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/physa Is econophysics a new discipline? The neopositivist argument Christophe Schinckus ∗ CIRST, University of Quebec at Montreal (UQAM), 100 Sherbrooke Ouest, Montréal, QC, H2X 3P2, Canada article info a b s t r a c t Article history: Econophysics is a new approach which applies various models and concepts associated Received 7 July 2009 with statistical physics to economic (and financial) phenomena. This field of research is Received in revised form 1 April 2010 a new step in the history and the evolution of Physics Sciences and the question about Available online 27 May 2010 the disciplinary characteristics of this field must be asked. At first glance, it might appear that economics and econophysics share the same subject of research (that of analysis of Keywords: economic reality). In this paper I will use neopositivism to show that econophysics is Econophysics methodologically very different from economics and that it can be considered as a separate Neopositivism Neoclassical economics discipline. The neopositivist framework provides econophysics with some arguments for rejecting mainstream economics. ' 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 0. Introduction Econophysics, which emerged over a decade ago, applies various models and concepts imported from condensed matter and statistical physics to analyze economic and financial phenomena. This new field of research has generated a lot of methodological debate [1–5]. It is often presented as a positivist discipline [6,7] that provides a more empirical basis to economics [8–10]. Despite the novelty of this new approach, more and more papers about econophysics have been published in journals devoted to Physics and Statistical Mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • View Dr. Vodenska's Curriculum Vitae 2021-05
    IRENA VODENSKA Department of Administrative Sciences, Metropolitan College, Boston University 808 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA Phone: 617-358-0005; Email: [email protected] Education PH.D., ECONOPHYSICS (STATISTICAL FINANCE), University Professors Program, Boston University 9/2005 – 9/2009 Dissertation: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Understanding and Forecasting Volatility Advisor: Professor H. Eugene Stanley Award for Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation for the academic year 2009-2010 MA, MASTER OF ARTS IN ECONOMICS, Focus in Health Economics and International Finance 9/2019 – 5/2021 College of Arts and Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA MBA, MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Major in Finance with International emphasis 9/1994 – 5/1996 Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN BS, MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, Major in Database Management 10/1988 – 10/1993 School of Business Management, University of Belgrade, Yugoslavia Certifications and Charters CFA, CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANALYST, CFA INSTITUTE NOVEMBER, 2004 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS (NASD) SERIES 7, SERIES 63, SERIES 55 CERTIFIED SECURITIES DEALER/TRADER SINCE 1997 Academic Appointments PROFESSOR, ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES DEPARTMENT, MET COLLEGE, BOSTON UNIVERSITY, Boston, MA 3/2021 - PRESENT Established cross-college research collaboration with BU faculty and graduate students Including the Law School, and the College of Ars and Sciences (Economics and Physics) Developed strategies for course cross-listings between
    [Show full text]
  • 1 on the “Usual” Misunderstandings Between Econophysics and Finance
    On the “usual” misunderstandings between econophysics and finance: Some clarifications on modelling approaches and efficient market hypothesis Marcel Ausloos, Franck Jovanovic, Christophe Schinckus School of Management – University of Leicester Abstract In line with the recent research and debates about econophysics and financial economics, this article discusses on usual misunderstandings between the two disciplines in terms of modelling and basic hypotheses. In the literature devoted to econophysics, the methodology used by financial economists is frequently considered as a top-down approach (starting from a priori “first principles”) while econophysicists rather present themselves as scholars working with a (empirical data prone) bottom-up approach. Although this dualist perspective is very common in the econophysics literature, this paper claims that the distinction is very confusing and does not permit to reveal the essence of the differences between finance and econophysics. The distinction between these two fields is mainly investigated here through the lens of the Efficient Market Hypothesis in order to show that, in substance, econophysics and financial economics tend to have a similar approach implying that the misunderstanding between these two fields at the modelling level can therefore be overstepped. JEL classification: G1, B4, B5 Keywords: Financial economics and econophysics; Statistical physics applied to finance; Efficient market hypothesis; Interdisciplinarity; Econophysics I) Introduction This article is a contribution in line with the recent research aiming to increase the dialogue between physicists (particularly econophysicists) and financial economists (Ausloos, 2001, 2013; Bouchaud, 2002; Bouchaud et al., 2002; Carbone et al., 2007; Chakrabarti & Chakraborti, 2010; Chen & Li, 2012; Durlauf, 2005, 2012; Farmer & Lux, 2008; Gabaix, 2009; Jovanovic & Schinckus, 2015, 2016; Keen, 2003; Lux, 2009; McCauley, 2006, 2009; McCauley et al., 2007; Potters & Bouchaud, 2003; Sornette, 2014; Stanley & Plerou, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • AN INTRODUCTION to ECONOPHYSICS Correlations and Complexity in Finance
    AN INTRODUCTION TO ECONOPHYSICS Correlations and Complexity in Finance ROSARIO N. MANTEGNA Dipartimento di Energetica ed Applicazioni di Fisica, Palermo University H. EUGENE STANLEY Center for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University An Introduction to Econophysics This book concerns the use of concepts from statistical physics in the description of financial systems. Specifically, the authors illustrate the scaling concepts used in probability theory, in critical phenomena, and in fully developed turbulent fluids. These concepts are then applied to financial time series to gain new insights into the behavior of financial markets. The authors also present a new stochastic model that displays several of the statistical properties observed in empirical data. Usually in the study of economic systems it is possible to investigate the system at different scales. But it is often impossible to write down the 'microscopic' equation for all the economic entities interacting within a given system. Statistical physics concepts such as stochastic dynamics, short- and long-range correlations, self-similarity and scaling permit an understanding of the global behavior of economic systems without first having to work out a detailed microscopic description of the same system. This book will be of interest both to physicists and to economists. Physicists will find the application of statistical physics concepts to economic systems interesting and challenging, as economic systems are among the most intriguing and fascinating complex systems that might be investigated. Economists and workers in the financial world will find useful the presentation of empirical analysis methods and well- formulated theoretical tools that might help describe systems composed of a huge number of interacting subsystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in Statistical Finance
    TOPICS IN STATISTICAL FINANCE BY VENKATA SASIKIRAN GOTETI A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School—New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Statistics Written under the direction of Prof. Kesar Singh and Prof. Larry Shepp and approved by New Brunswick, New Jersey May, 2008 c 2008 Venkata Sasikiran Goteti ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Topics in Statistical Finance by Venkata Sasikiran Goteti Dissertation Director: Prof. Kesar Singh and Prof. Larry Shepp This thesis is divided into three parts. The first part investigates the presence of long term dependence in stock price data via a permutation test based on the cor- relation structure of the underlying stock prices. These tests reveal the short term nature of stock price dependence structure. The second part extends Ramprasath and Singh(2007)’s ‘statistical options’ to define a group of American type options based on robust estimators of location. The payoff functions of these path dependent options are based on a new set of stochastic processes which are defined using various robust estimators of location. The asymptotic distributional behavior of these new processes is ascertained which in turn is used in pricing the options. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods were used to compute the prices of the statistical options. The third part explores a stock price model parameter estimation problem and interprets a growth rate parameter. ii Acknowledgements Many people have contributed greatly in preparing this dissertation. This thesis would not have been possible without the valuable guidance, constant support and encour- agement I received from Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Thinking and Statistical Physics
    STATISTICAL THINKING AND STATISTICAL PHYSICS Gheorghe S ĂVOIU * Abstract. This paper presents a framework for the design and analysis of Statistics as a scientific way of thinking. Contemporary Statistics for economists and for physicists are not complete or harmonized disciplines. Models for statistical ways of thinking and problem solving have been developed, and continue to be developed, not only by teachers but also by scientific researchers / practitioners. Today it becomes possible for method and concepts of statistical physics to have real influence in statistical thin- king or economic thinking, but it is also possible that economical and cla- ssical statistical methods and concepts can influence physics thinking too. In a comparison to classical statistical thinking, a new science like Econo- physics – primarily focused on analysis of financial markets and its impor- tant achievements defining new statistical mechanics of money distribution – have revealed that heterogeneous in reality must be explained with homo- geneous in theory. Econophysics will continue to contribute due to its statistical physics method to statistical and economic thinking in a variety of distinctive directions, ranging from macroeconomics to market micro- structure. A modern book of Statistics must contain statistical physics and statistical quantum approaches too. Finally, this is another role of this paper to underline the importance of the method of statistical physics to unify and simplify statistical thinking for economist, physicists and econophysicists. Keywords: statistics, physics, econophysics, statistical way of thinking, statistical physics, method of statistical physics. 1. Introduction Specific economic theories are constructed from rationality which is the same thing as maximizing expected utility by applying the basic postulates to various economic situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerald Jabes Jabes6112
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: www.emeraldinsight.com/2515-964X.htm Duality of Duality of knowledge, knowledge, singularity of method singularity of method The case of econophysics and J.S. Mill’s notion of emergence 163 Christophe Schinckus Received 2 May 2018 Department of Economics and Finance, Accepted 2 May 2018 RMIT International University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, and Cinla Akdere University of Paris I, Paris, France and Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey Abstract Purpose – How a micro-founded discipline such as economics could deal with the increasing global economic reality? This question has been asked frequently since the last economic crisis that appeared in 2008. In this challenging context, some commentators have turned their attention to a new area of knowledge coming from physics: econophysics which mainly focuses on a macro-analysis of economic systems. By showing that concepts used by econophysicists are consistent with an existing economic knowledge (developed by J.S. Mill), the purpose of this paper is to claim that an interdisciplinary perspective is possible between these two communities. Design/methodology/approach – The authors propose a historical and conceptual analysis of the key concept of emergence to emphasize the potential bridge between econophysics and economics. Findings – Six methodological arguments will be developed in order to show the existence of conceptual bridges as a necessary condition for the elaboration of a common language between economists and econophysics which would not be superfluous, in this challenging context, to clarify the growing complexity of economic phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • SIAM Conference on Financial Mathematics & Engineering
    Program SIAM Conference on Financial Mathematics & Engineering Sponsored by the SIAM Activity Group on Financial Mathematics and Engineering. The Activity Group on Financial Mathematics and Engineering focuses on research and practice in financial mathematics, computation, and engineering. Its goals are to foster collaborations among mathematical scientists, statisticians, computer scientists, computational scientists, and researchers and practitioners in finance and economics, and to foster collaborations in the use of mathematical and computational tools in quantitative finance in the public and private sector. The activity group promotes and facilitates the development of financial mathematics and engineering as an academic discipline. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 3600 Market Street, 6th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19104-2688 U.S. Telephone: +1-215-382-9800 Fax: +1-215-386-7999 Conference E-mail: [email protected] • Conference Web: www.siam.org/meetings/ Membership and Customer Service: (800) 447-7426 (U.S. & Canada) or +1-215-382-9800 (worldwide) https://www.siam.org/conferences/CM/Main/fm19 2 SIAM Conference on Financial Mathematics and Engineering Table of Contents Model Risk and Uncertainty Child Care Program-At-A-Glance… Optimal Stopping Tourism Toronto recommends Babysitting ..........................See separate handout Optimal Transport Angels and Care.com for attendees interested in child care services. Care.com provides a General Information .............................2 Option Pricing and Hedging web-based
    [Show full text]
  • An Essay on Econophysics
    When Physics Became Undisciplined: An Essay on Econophysics Dr. Christophe Claude Schinckus August 2018 Department of History and Philosophy of Science Girton College, University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History and Philosophy of Science When Physics Became Undisciplined An Essay on Econophysics Dr. Christophe Schinckus Abstract In the 1990s, physicists started looking beyond their disciplinary boundaries by using their methods to study various problems usually thrown up by financial economics. This dissertation deals with this extension of physics outside its disciplinary borders. It seeks to determine what sort of discipline econophysics is in relation to physics and to economics, how its emergence was made possible, and what sort of knowledge it produces. Using a variety of evidence including bibliometric analysis Chapter 1 explores the field’s disciplinary identity as a branch of physics even though its intellectual heart is better seen as the re-emergence of a 1960s research programme initiated in economics. Chapter 2 is historical: it identifies the key role played by the Santa Fe Institute and its pioneering complexity research in the shaping of methodological horizons of econophysics. These are in turn investigated in Chapter 3, which argues that there are in fact three methodological strands: statistical econophysics, bottom-up agent-based econophysics, and top-down agent-based econophysics. Viewed from a Lakatosian perspective they all share a conceptual hard-core but articulate the protective belt in distinctly different ways. The last and final chapter is devoted to the way econophysicists produce and justify their knowledge. It shows that econophysics operates by proposing empirically adequate analogies between physical and other systems in exactly the ways emphasised by Pierre Duhem.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Statistical Arbitrage and Algorithmic Trading
    Statistical Arbitrage and Algorithmic Trading : Overview and Applications Miquel Noguer Alonso - Licenciado y Master en Administración y Dirección de Empresas – Universitat Ramon Llull - ESADE Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales Departamento de Economía Aplicada Cuantitativa II UNED 2010 1 Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales Departamento de Economía Aplicada Cuantitativa II Statistical Arbitrage and Algorithmic Trading : Overview and Applications Miquel Noguer Alonso - Licenciado y Master en Administración y Dirección de Empresas – Universitat Ramon Llull – ESADE - UBS AG Director : Andreu Pacheco Pages IFAE/CERN Codirector : Manuel Jose Sanchez Sanchez UNED 2 This PhD Thesis is a tribute to my family. To my mother and brother, whose confidence, support in me has been a constant in my life, to my wife Mima, whose love, patience, and understanding have been the foundations of this work. To the memory of my father, wherever he is, I love him so much. To my son Jordi who came early this year to inspire my work, bringing to our family such happiness that cannot be imagined. 3 Acknowledgements This PhD thesis is the result of more than a decade of work with my talented colleagues in UBS, Andbanc as many other people in the financial industry. Thanks to my Thesis Director, Andreu Pacheco Pages, for his knowledge, patience, help with ideas and devoting his precious time to my work! Thanks to Alberto Alvarez and Jose Manuel Sanchez for their guidance, dedication and support through all my PhD time at their university. Thanks to Christian Mazza, Jean Pierre Gabriel and Ales Janka for their collaboration in the research in Fribourg University.
    [Show full text]