Ribosome Stoichiometry: from Form to Function
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Different Genetic Mechanisms Mediate Spontaneous Versus UVR-Induced
RESEARCH ARTICLE Different genetic mechanisms mediate spontaneous versus UVR-induced malignant melanoma Blake Ferguson1, Herlina Y Handoko1, Pamela Mukhopadhyay1, Arash Chitsazan1, Lois Balmer2,3, Grant Morahan2, Graeme J Walker1†* 1Drug Discovery Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia; 2Centre for Diabetes Research, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Australia; 3School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia Abstract Genetic variation conferring resistance and susceptibility to carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis is frequently studied in mice. We have now turned this idea to melanoma using the collaborative cross (CC), a resource of mouse strains designed to discover genes for complex diseases. We studied melanoma-prone transgenic progeny across seventy CC genetic backgrounds. We mapped a strong quantitative trait locus for rapid onset spontaneous melanoma onset to Prkdc, a gene involved in detection and repair of DNA damage. In contrast, rapid onset UVR-induced melanoma was linked to the ribosomal subunit gene Rrp15. Ribosome biogenesis was upregulated in skin shortly after UVR exposure. Mechanistically, variation in the ‘usual suspects’ by which UVR may exacerbate melanoma, defective DNA repair, melanocyte proliferation, or inflammatory cell infiltration, did not explain melanoma susceptibility or resistance across the CC. *For correspondence: [email protected] Instead, events occurring soon after exposure, such as dysregulation of ribosome function, which alters many aspects of cellular metabolism, may be important. † Present address: Experimental DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42424.001 Dermatology Group, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Woolloongabba, Australia Introduction Competing interests: The Cutaneous malignant melanoma (MM) is well known to be associated with high levels of sun expo- authors declare that no sure. -
Anti-MRPS17 Monoclonal Antibody, Clone FQS23694 (DCABH-6110) This Product Is for Research Use Only and Is Not Intended for Diagnostic Use
Anti-MRPS17 monoclonal antibody, clone FQS23694 (DCABH-6110) This product is for research use only and is not intended for diagnostic use. PRODUCT INFORMATION Product Overview Rabbit monoclonal to MRPS17 Antigen Description Mammalian mitochondrial ribosomal proteins are encoded by nuclear genes and help in protein synthesis within the mitochondrion. Mitochondrial ribosomes (mitoribosomes) consist of a small 28S subunit and a large 39S subunit. They have an estimated 75% protein to rRNA composition compared to prokaryotic ribosomes, where this ratio is reversed. Another difference between mammalian mitoribosomes and prokaryotic ribosomes is that the latter contain a 5S rRNA. Among different species, the proteins comprising the mitoribosome differ greatly in sequence, and sometimes in biochemical properties, which prevents easy recognition by sequence homology. This gene encodes a 28S subunit protein that belongs to the ribosomal protein S17P family. The encoded protein is moderately conserved between human mitochondrial and prokaryotic ribosomal proteins. Pseudogenes corresponding to this gene are found on chromosomes 1p, 3p, 6q, 14p, 18q, and Xq. Immunogen Recombinant fragment within Human MRPS17. The exact sequence is proprietary.Database link: Q9Y2R5 Isotype IgG Source/Host Rabbit Species Reactivity Human Clone FQS23694 Purity Tissue culture supernatant Conjugate Unconjugated Applications IHC-P, WB, ICC/IF, IP Positive Control HeLa, HepG2 and U937 cell lysate; Human kidney and liver tissue; HeLa cells Format Liquid Size 100 μl Buffer pH: 7.2; Preservative: 0.01% Sodium azide; Constituents: 49% PBS, 0.05% BSA, 50% Glycerol 45-1 Ramsey Road, Shirley, NY 11967, USA Email: [email protected] Tel: 1-631-624-4882 Fax: 1-631-938-8221 1 © Creative Diagnostics All Rights Reserved Preservative 0.01% Sodium Azide Storage Store at +4°C short term (1-2 weeks). -
Micrornas Mediated Regulation of the Ribosomal Proteins and Its Consequences on the Global Translation of Proteins
cells Review microRNAs Mediated Regulation of the Ribosomal Proteins and Its Consequences on the Global Translation of Proteins Abu Musa Md Talimur Reza 1,2 and Yu-Guo Yuan 1,3,* 1 Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; [email protected] 2 Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawi´nskiego5a, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland 3 Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Zoonosis/Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, The Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-514-8797-9228 Abstract: Ribosomal proteins (RPs) are mostly derived from the energy-consuming enzyme families such as ATP-dependent RNA helicases, AAA-ATPases, GTPases and kinases, and are important structural components of the ribosome, which is a supramolecular ribonucleoprotein complex, composed of Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and RPs, coordinates the translation and synthesis of proteins with the help of transfer RNA (tRNA) and other factors. Not all RPs are indispensable; in other words, the ribosome could be functional and could continue the translation of proteins instead of lacking in some of the RPs. However, the lack of many RPs could result in severe defects in the biogenesis of ribosomes, which could directly influence the overall translation processes and global expression of the proteins leading to the emergence of different diseases including cancer. While microRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs and one of the potent regulators of the post-transcriptional 0 gene expression, miRNAs regulate gene expression by targeting the 3 untranslated region and/or coding region of the messenger RNAs (mRNAs), and by interacting with the 50 untranslated region, Citation: Reza, A.M.M.T.; Yuan, Y.-G. -
Mitochondrial Translation and Its Impact on Protein Homeostasis And
Mitochondrial translation and its impact on protein homeostasis and aging Tamara Suhm Academic dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biochemistry at Stockholm University to be publicly defended on Friday 15 February 2019 at 09.00 in Magnélisalen, Kemiska övningslaboratoriet, Svante Arrhenius väg 16 B. Abstract Besides their famous role as powerhouse of the cell, mitochondria are also involved in many signaling processes and metabolism. Therefore, it is unsurprising that mitochondria are no isolated organelles but are in constant crosstalk with other parts of the cell. Due to the endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria, they still contain their own genome and gene expression machinery. The mitochondrial genome of yeast encodes eight proteins whereof seven are core subunits of the respiratory chain and ATP synthase. These subunits need to be assembled with subunits imported from the cytosol to ensure energy supply of the cell. Hence, coordination, timing and accuracy of mitochondrial gene expression is crucial for cellular energy production and homeostasis. Despite the central role of mitochondrial translation surprisingly little is known about the molecular mechanisms. In this work, I used baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to study different aspects of mitochondrial translation. Exploiting the unique possibility to make directed modifications in the mitochondrial genome of yeast, I established a mitochondrial encoded GFP reporter. This reporter allows monitoring of mitochondrial translation with different detection methods and enables more detailed studies focusing on timing and regulation of mitochondrial translation. Furthermore, employing insights gained from bacterial translation, we showed that mitochondrial translation efficiency directly impacts on protein homeostasis of the cytoplasm and lifespan by affecting stress handling. -
The Role of Human Ribosomal Proteins in the Maturation of Rrna and Ribosome Production
JOBNAME: RNA 14#9 2008 PAGE: 1 OUTPUT: Friday August 8 17:34:50 2008 csh/RNA/164293/rna11320 Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on September 27, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The role of human ribosomal proteins in the maturation of rRNA and ribosome production SARA ROBLEDO,1,3 RACHEL A. IDOL,1,3 DAN L. CRIMMINS,2 JACK H. LADENSON,2 PHILIP J. MASON,1,4 and MONICA BESSLER1,4 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA 2Department of Pathology and Immunology, Division of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA ABSTRACT Production of ribosomes is a fundamental process that occurs in all dividing cells. It is a complex process consisting of the coordinated synthesis and assembly of four ribosomal RNAs (rRNA) with about 80 ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) involving more than 150 nonribosomal proteins and other factors. Diamond Blackfan anemia (DBA) is an inherited red cell aplasia caused by mutations in one of several r-proteins. How defects in r-proteins, essential for proliferation in all cells, lead to a human disease with a specific defect in red cell development is unknown. Here, we investigated the role of r-proteins in ribosome biogenesis in order to find out whether those mutated in DBA have any similarities. We depleted HeLa cells using siRNA for several individual r-proteins of the small (RPS6, RPS7, RPS15, RPS16, RPS17, RPS19, RPS24, RPS25, RPS28) or large subunit (RPL5, RPL7, RPL11, RPL14, RPL26, RPL35a) and studied the effect on rRNA processing and ribosome production. -
Analyzing Ribosome Remodeling in Health and Disease Aleksandra A
Analyzing ribosome remodeling in health and disease Aleksandra A. Petelski,1;2;3 & Nikolai Slavov1;2;3; 1Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA 2Barnett Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA 3Department of Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Increasing evidence suggests that ribosomes actively regulate protein synthesis. However, much of this evidence is indirect, leaving this layer of gene regulation largely unexplored, in part due to methodological limitations. Indeed, we review evidence demonstrating that commonly used methods, such as transcriptomics, are inadequate because the variability in mRNAs coding for ribosomal proteins (RP) does not necessarily correspond to RP variability. Thus protein remodeling of ribosomes should be investigated by methods that allow direct quantification of RPs, ideally of isolated ribosomes. We review such methods, focusing on mass spectrometry and emphasizing method-specific biases and approaches to control these biases. We argue that using multiple complementary methods can help reduce the danger of interpreting reproducible systematic biases as evidence for ribosome remodeling. Introduction The control of gene expression is crucial for all biological processes, from developmental stages and homeostasis maintenance to regeneration processes. This regulation occurs at multiple layers, both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Historically, transcription has been studied more extensively than translation, in large part because of the accessibility of technologies for nucleic acid analysis. However, gene regulation via translation was appreciated as early as the late arXiv:2007.05839v2 [q-bio.QM] 2 Aug 2020 1960’s. For example, the production of insulin was linked to the increased number of polysomes and protein synthesis [1]. -
History of the Ribosome and the Origin of Translation
History of the ribosome and the origin of translation Anton S. Petrova,1, Burak Gulena, Ashlyn M. Norrisa, Nicholas A. Kovacsa, Chad R. Berniera, Kathryn A. Laniera, George E. Foxb, Stephen C. Harveyc, Roger M. Wartellc, Nicholas V. Huda, and Loren Dean Williamsa,1 aSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332; bDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204; and cSchool of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 Edited by David M. Hillis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved November 6, 2015 (received for review May 18, 2015) We present a molecular-level model for the origin and evolution of building up of the functional centers, proceeds to the establishment the translation system, using a 3D comparative method. In this model, of the common core, and continues to the development of large the ribosome evolved by accretion, recursively adding expansion metazoan rRNAs. segments, iteratively growing, subsuming, and freezing the rRNA. Incremental evolution of function is mapped out by stepwise Functions of expansion segments in the ancestral ribosome are accretion of rRNA. In the extant ribosome, specific segments of assigned by correspondence with their functions in the extant rRNA perform specific functions including peptidyl transfer, ribosome. The model explains the evolution of the large ribosomal subunit association, decoding, and energy-driven translocation subunit, the small ribosomal subunit, tRNA, and mRNA. Prokaryotic (11). The model assumes that the correlations of rRNA segments ribosomes evolved in six phases, sequentially acquiring capabilities with their functions have been reasonably maintained over the for RNA folding, catalysis, subunit association, correlated evolution, broad course of ribosomal evolution. -
DNA–Protein Interactions DNA–Protein Interactions
MethodsMethods inin MolecularMolecular BiologyBiologyTM VOLUME 148 DNA–ProteinDNA–Protein InteractionsInteractions PrinciplesPrinciples andand ProtocolsProtocols SECOND EDITION EditedEdited byby TTomom MossMoss POLII TFIIH HUMANA PRESS M e t h o d s i n M o l e c u l a r B I O L O G Y TM John M. Walker, Series Editor 178.`Antibody Phage Display: Methods and Protocols, edited by 147. Affinity Chromatography: Methods and Protocols, edited by Philippa M. O’Brien and Robert Aitken, 2001 Pascal Bailon, George K. Ehrlich, Wen-Jian Fung, and 177. Two-Hybrid Systems: Methods and Protocols, edited by Paul Wolfgang Berthold, 2000 N. MacDonald, 2001 146. Mass Spectrometry of Proteins and Peptides, edited by John 176. Steroid Receptor Methods: Protocols and Assays, edited by R. Chapman, 2000 Benjamin A. Lieberman, 2001 145. Bacterial Toxins: Methods and Protocols, edited by Otto Holst, 175. Genomics Protocols, edited by Michael P. Starkey and 2000 Ramnath Elaswarapu, 2001 144. Calpain Methods and Protocols, edited by John S. Elce, 2000 174. Epstein-Barr Virus Protocols, edited by Joanna B. Wilson 143. Protein Structure Prediction: Methods and Protocols, and Gerhard H. W. May, 2001 edited by David Webster, 2000 173. Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols, Volume 2: Methods and 142. Transforming Growth Factor-Beta Protocols, edited by Philip Techniques, edited by Hans J. Vogel, 2001 H. Howe, 2000 172. Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols, Volume 1: Reviews and 141. Plant Hormone Protocols, edited by Gregory A. Tucker and Case Histories, edited by Hans J. Vogel, 2001 Jeremy A. Roberts, 2000 171. Proteoglycan Protocols, edited by Renato V. Iozzo, 2001 140. -
RPSA Gene Ribosomal Protein SA
RPSA gene ribosomal protein SA Normal Function The RPSA gene provides instructions for making a protein called ribosomal protein SA, which is one of approximately 80 different ribosomal proteins. These proteins come together to form structures called ribosomes. Ribosomes process the cell's genetic instructions to create proteins. Each ribosome is made up of two parts (subunits) called the large subunit and the small subunit. Ribosomal protein SA is part of the small subunit. The specific roles of each of the ribosomal proteins within the ribosome are not entirely understood. Some ribosomal proteins are involved in the assembly or stability of ribosomes. Others help carry out the ribosome's main function of building new proteins. Research suggests that ribosomal protein SA helps the ribosome control the production of certain proteins, many of which are likely important for development before birth. Health Conditions Related to Genetic Changes Isolated congenital asplenia At least 20 RPSA gene mutations have been identified in individuals with isolated congenital asplenia. People with this condition do not have a spleen but have no other developmental abnormalities. The spleen plays an important role in the immune system. Without this organ, affected individuals are highly susceptible to bacterial infections, which can be life-threatening. RPSA gene mutations are thought to reduce the amount of functional ribosomal protein SA. A shortage of the normal protein likely impairs the assembly of ribosomes, but the specific effects of the mutations -
Targeting Myelin Lipid Metabolism As a Potential Therapeutic Strategy in a Model of CMT1A Neuropathy
ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05420-0 OPEN Targeting myelin lipid metabolism as a potential therapeutic strategy in a model of CMT1A neuropathy R. Fledrich 1,2,3, T. Abdelaal 1,4,5, L. Rasch1,4, V. Bansal6, V. Schütza1,3, B. Brügger7, C. Lüchtenborg7, T. Prukop1,4,8, J. Stenzel1,4, R.U. Rahman6, D. Hermes 1,4, D. Ewers 1,4, W. Möbius 1,9, T. Ruhwedel1, I. Katona 10, J. Weis10, D. Klein11, R. Martini11, W. Brück12, W.C. Müller3, S. Bonn 6,13, I. Bechmann2, K.A. Nave1, R.M. Stassart 1,3,12 & M.W. Sereda1,4 1234567890():,; In patients with Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease 1A (CMT1A), peripheral nerves display aberrant myelination during postnatal development, followed by slowly progressive demye- lination and axonal loss during adult life. Here, we show that myelinating Schwann cells in a rat model of CMT1A exhibit a developmental defect that includes reduced transcription of genes required for myelin lipid biosynthesis. Consequently, lipid incorporation into myelin is reduced, leading to an overall distorted stoichiometry of myelin proteins and lipids with ultrastructural changes of the myelin sheath. Substitution of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine in the diet is sufficient to overcome the myelination deficit of affected Schwann cells in vivo. This treatment rescues the number of myelinated axons in the peripheral nerves of the CMT rats and leads to a marked amelioration of neuropathic symptoms. We propose that lipid supplementation is an easily translatable potential therapeutic approach in CMT1A and possibly other dysmyelinating neuropathies. 1 Department of Neurogenetics, Max-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen 37075, Germany. -
Elabscience.Com ® E-Mail:[email protected] Elabscience Elabscience Biotechnology Inc
Tel:240-252-7368(USA) Fax:240-252-7376(USA) www.elabscience.com ® E-mail:[email protected] Elabscience Elabscience Biotechnology Inc. MRPL20 Polyclonal Antibody Catalog No. E-AB-18777 Reactivity H,M Storage Store at -20℃. Avoid freeze / thaw cycles. Host Rabbit Applications WB,IHC,ELISA Isotype IgG Note: Centrifuge before opening to ensure complete recovery of vial contents. Images Immunogen Information Immunogen Fusion protein of human MRPL20 Gene Accession BC009515 Swissprot Q9BYC9 Synonyms 39S ribosomal protein L20,mitochondrial,L20mt,MG C4779,MGC74465,Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L20,MRPL 20 Western blot analysis of RAW264.7 Product Information cell lysate using MRPL20 Polyclonal Calculated MW 17 kDa Antibody at dilution of 1:900 Observed MW Refer to figures Buffer PBS with 0.05% NaN3 and 40% Glycerol,pH7.4 Purify Antigen affinity purification Dilution WB 1:500-1:2000, IHC 1:50-1:200, ELISA 1:5000-1:10000 Background MRPL20 is one of more than 70 protein components of mitochondrial Immunohistochemistry of paraffin- ribosomes that are encoded by the nuclear genome. MRPL20 is a subunit embedded Human liver cancer tissue of the 39S mitochondrial ribosome. Mitochondrial ribosomes using MRPL20 Polyclonal Antibody at (mitoribosomes) consist of a small 28S subunit and a large 39S subunit. dilution of 1:60(×200) They have an estimated 75% protein to rRNA composition compared to prokaryotic ribosomes, where this ratio is reversed. Another difference between mammalian mitoribosomes and prokaryotic ribosomes is that the latter contain a 5S rRNA. Among different species, the proteins comprising the mitoribosome differ greatly in sequence, and sometimes in biochemical properties, which prevents easy recognition by sequence homology. -
The C-Terminal Extension Domain of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Mrpl32, a Homolog of Ribosomal Protein L32, Functions in Trans to Support Mitochondrial Translation
Genes Genet. Syst. (2018) 93, p. 21–24 Function of C-terminal extension of MrpL32 21 The C-terminal extension domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MrpL32, a homolog of ribosomal protein L32, functions in trans to support mitochondrial translation Ivo Ngundu Woogeng and Madoka Kitakawa* Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kobe University, Rokko 1-1, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan (Received 3 June 2017, accepted 10 August 2017; J-STAGE Advance published date: 17 January 2018) Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L32 (MrpL32) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is homologous to the bacterial L32 ribosomal protein. MrpL32 carries an N-terminal mitochondrion-targeting sequence (MTS) and is about 60 amino acid residues lon- ger at the C-terminus. Adding to its function as a leader sequence, the MTS of MrpL32 has been reported to regulate ribosome biogenesis through its processing by m-AAA protease. However, the function of the C-terminal extension (CE) remains totally unknown. Therefore, we constructed a series of C-terminally truncated mrpl32 (mrpl32ΔC) genes and expressed them in a Δmrpl32 mutant to examine their function. Interestingly, some MrpL32ΔC derivatives exhibited temperature- sensitive (ts) growth on medium with non-fermentable carbon sources. Further- more, the CE domain of MrpL32, expressed separately from MrpL32ΔC, could rescue the ts phenotype of mutants by improving mitochondrial protein synthesis. Key words: C-terminal extension, mitochondrial ribosome, MrpL32 Many protein components of mitochondrial ribosomes (Huff et al., 1993). are homologous to eubacterial ribosomal proteins, but they MrpL32 is unique; its long mitochondrion-targeting tend to be larger than the corresponding bacterial proteins sequence (MTS) (71 aa) is a target of m-AAA prote- (Graack and Wittmann-Liebold, 1998; Gan et al., 2002; ase, and the loss of MrpL32 processing is thoroughly Smits et al., 2007).