DOCSLIB.ORG

Welby's Influence on Russell's Turn To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Welby's Influence on Russell's Turn To WELBY’S INFLUENCE ON RUSSELL’S TURN TO USE? SCOTT METZGER, MCMASTER UNIVERSITY [email protected] “Two really important works on logic are these [Welby’s What is Meaning? and Russell’s Principles of Mathematics]… Yet it is almost grotesque to name them together, so utterly disparate are their characters.” –Charles Sanders Peirce, Review in The Nation, CP 8.171 A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF THE CORE PROBLEM: MY MOTIVATION • Welby and Russell correspond about meaning and denotation in 1905. • Russell dismisses Welby, claiming that she misunderstands the scope of his project. The early Russell was not interested in meaning. • Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen: “In 1908 Russell confessed privately to Jourdain how he had “in the past been very rude to Welby, in refusing to go there” because he found it “quite impossible to be sincere” if he saw her. He no longer wanted “to be a party to” those philosophers encouraging Welby’s work, which in his opinion was “very wrong.”” (157) AND YET… • In his later review of Ogden & Richard’s The Meaning of Meaning, Russell writes that: “When in youth, I learned what was called “philosophy”…no one ever mentioned to me the question of “Meaning.” Later, I became acquainted with Lady Welby’s work on the subject, but failed to take it seriously. […] I have now come to believe that the order of words in time or space is an ineradicable part of much of their significance—in fact, that the reason they can express space time occurrences is that they are space-time occurrences, so that a logic independent of the accidental nature of space- time becomes an idle dream.” (Russell 109) • Also, Misak writes that, in My Philosophical Development, Russell “cites Welby and Schiller as those who sparked his interest in the topic [of meaning], although at the time they had pressed him on the point, he resisted” (Misak 143). SO… • It is clear that Russell initially dismissed Welby. • It is also clear that eventually he comes around to some of Welby’s concerns, especially in his later The Analysis of Mind (1921), where scholars like Misak and Levine have noted Russell’s turn to a use-based account of meaning. • Interestingly, Welby was already grappling with meaning some 15 years before Russell finally comes around to the point. Her direct influence on Russell’s turn to use needs to be further excavated. THE AIM • To come to grips with a narrow segment of Bertrand Russell and Victoria Welby’s Correspondence between November 14, 1905 and December 15, 1905. • I argue that, while a shallow reading of their correspondence yields the interpretation that Welby has misunderstood Russell, a deeper reading reveals the ways in which Welby brings a pragmatic attitude to bear on Russell’s theory of descriptions in order to try to get Russell to extend the scope of his project into the domain of meaning. THE WAY FORWARD • I outline 2 suggestions that Welby offers to Russell’s “On Denoting” and Russell’s dismissal of them. • I then consider why Welby’s suggestions are important by building on some relevant aspects of her work. • Finally, I conclude by showing how Russell begins to come around to Welby’s suggestions in his later The Analysis of Mind. WHO IS LADY VICTORIA WELBY? • April 27, 1837–March 29, 1912, London England. • Education: Travelled the globe with her Mother, the poet, Emmeline Stuart-Wortley • Her mother died by her side during their travels in Syria and upon returning to England she became a Maid of Honour to her Godmother, Queen Victoria. • Philosophical Work: Founder of Significs. Wrote on rhetoric, meaning, semiotics, and religion • Corresponded with leading intellectuals of her time: Peirce, James, Russell, Schiller, Bergson and others. • A mentor of the young Charles Ogden THE RUSSELL-WELBY CORRESPONDENCE • Unpublished until recently by Susan Petrilli in her 2009 Magnum Opus Signifying and Understanding. • Welby and Russell were in correspondence from 1904 through to 1910. • They discuss many topics including, but not limited to, the philosophy of mathematics, logic, meaning, politics, and Women’s rights. • I limit my scope to their correspondence between November 14, 1905 and December 15, 1905. • Here they concern themselves with Russell’s famous (then, just published) essay “On Denoting.” WELBY’S FIRST SUGGESTION • Targets the distinction Russell makes between “Acquaintance” and “Knowledge about”. • Russell: “the distinction between acquaintance and knowledge about is the distinction between the things we have presentations of, and the things we can only reach by means of denoting phrases” (Russell “On Denoting” 41). • Example: The centre mass of the Solar System, and Mind. WELBY’S FIRST SUGGESTION • Russell: “all thinking has to start from acquaintance; but it succeeds in thinking about many things with which we have no acquaintance” (Russell “On Denoting” 42). • Welby targets this final point and wants to make the distinction threefold. WELBY’S FIRST SUGGESTION • Welby’s Threefold Distinction: “Then we should have A. awareness which belongs to sensation and is shared by the simplest forms of life, B. acquaintance as direct experience of, and C. knowledge as you define it. We might be aware of other minds without being acquainted with them and without knowing them ‘through denoting.’ I venture to suggest this because the idea of awareness (earlier or lower than consciousness?) is associated in my mind with ‘Mother-Sense’—as it were the starting- sense” (Welby to Russell, 14 November 1905, qtd in Petrilli 321). MOTHER SENSE • For Welby, thinking begins with Mother Sense, not acquaintance. • Susan Petrilli: Mother-Sense (or Primal Sense) is the “necessary condition for the human signifying capacity” (Petrilli 142). • We are first and foremost signifying animals and we must understand ourselves as such. • That first which makes meaning possible. • Mother-Sense as a “primordial method of mind, one which is necessarily the precursor and condition of all forms mental activity, including even that of logic itself.” RUSSELL’S DISMISSAL • Russell is after neither the conditions that make meaning possible nor the psychological makeup of the signifying animal. • Russell: Welby’s Mother Sense “is not relevant to my problem.”—a narrow focus in logic. • Russell’s objective in 1905 is not to “give a complete account of (more or less) cognitive states of mind” (Russell to Welby 25 November 1905, qtd in Petrilli 322). • In an earlier letter to Welby (Feb 3, 1904) he writes: “The concept which denotes is not mental: it is the object of an idea, not the idea itself. Thus denoting in this sense has nothing psychological about it.” WELBY’S SECOND SUGGESTION • Targets the central principle of Russell’s “On Denoting”: “denoting phrases never have any meaning in themselves, but… every proposition in whose verbal expression they occur has a meaning” (Russell “On Denoting” 43). • Denoting phrases like “everything,” “nothing,” “something” and “a man” have no meaning in isolation, but only when put into a proposition. • Example: “a man” vs. “I met a man” WELBY’S SECOND SUGGESTION • Welby: denoting phrases can express meaning by themselves. • Welby: “‘What did you give to Smith?’ ‘Nothing.’ ‘And what to Jones?’ ‘Everything.’ The answerer hear emphatically intends (means) to convey a fact“ (Welby to Russell, 14 November 1905, qtd in Petrilli 321). RUSSELL’S DISMISSAL • Russell: In the case Welby describes the use of those words (“Everything” and “Nothing”) no longer function as denoting phrases but as “mere abbreviations for propositions” (Russell to Welby 25 November 1905, qtd in Petrilli 322). • Distinction: “logical isolation” VS “uttered by itself”. • ‘Everything’ only gains meaning when uttered as a response to the question ‘what did you give Smith?’ • In this context, ‘Everything’ is no longer a denoting phrase, but itself, a proposition. WELBY’S REPLY TO RUSSELL’S DISMISSAL • Welby: “…while words like ‘nothing’ are now as you say abbreviations from propositions, the case was originally and now is still in some minds, reversed. Once a word was the only sentence (as before that a sound the only word!) now the sentence—or proposition—is virtually the word. That is why the context becomes, in judging the value of a word, so important” (Welby to Russell 29 November 1905, qtd in Petrilli 323; my emphasis). THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEXT • The value of a word changes depending on the context that it is put to use in—context disambiguates. • Welby: “We must postulate an analogy between Context and Environment: the adaptation of the word, as of the organism, to its surroundings and conversely, its effect upon these.” (Petrilli 361). • Example: “Jack is a dog” vs. “Jack is a dog” • 1) Qua denoting phrase: picks out the properties ‘Fury’ and ‘quadruped.’ • 2) Qua connoting phrase: picks out the property ‘adventurous in the bedroom’. • In 2), the phrase extends its denoting capacity to suggest a metaphorical significance. MEANING QUA INTENTION • In addition, there is a difference in intention that alters the meaning of my proposition depending on whether I mean my dog or my friend Jack. • Some Psychology seeps into the logic here as to account for the meaning qua intention requires, by extension, an explanation of the speaking subject. • For Welby (and contra early-Russell) we must account for the interplay between pyschology and logic, and logic and rhetoric when determining the value of a word or proposition in a given context. RUSSELL’S FINAL DISMISSAL • Russell: “I am less concerned with what people do mean than with what things there are that might be meant… Thus when a single word was the only sentence, I should doubt whether, so far as anything definite was meant, what was meant differed from what we should express by some sentence of many words…” (Russell to Welby 15 December 1905, qtd in Petrilli 323) • A difference in aim: Welby is interested in what people do mean when they use language, but Russell only in what things there are that might be meant.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding Poststructuralism Understanding Movements in Modern Thought Series Editor: Jack Reynolds
    understanding poststructuralism Understanding Movements in Modern Thought Series Editor: Jack Reynolds Th is series provides short, accessible and lively introductions to the major schools, movements and traditions in philosophy and the history of ideas since the beginning of the Enlightenment. All books in the series are written for undergraduates meeting the subject for the fi rst time. Published Understanding Existentialism Understanding Virtue Ethics Jack Reynolds Stan van Hooft Understanding Poststructuralism James Williams Forthcoming titles include Understanding Empiricism Understanding Hermeneutics Robert Meyers Lawrence Schmidt Understanding Ethics Understanding Naturalism Tim Chappell Jack Ritchie Understanding Feminism Understanding Phenomenology Peta Bowden and Jane Mummery David Cerbone Understanding German Idealism Understanding Rationalism Will Dudley Charlie Heunemann Understanding Hegelianism Understanding Utilitarianism Robert Sinnerbrink Tim Mulgan understanding poststructuralism James Williams For Richard and Olive It is always about who you learn from. © James Williams, 2005 Th is book is copyright under the Berne Convention. No reproduction without permission. All rights reserved. First published in 2005 by Acumen Acumen Publishing Limited 15a Lewins Yard East Street Chesham Bucks HP5 1HQ www.acumenpublishing.co.uk ISBN 1-84465-032-4 (hardcover) ISBN 1-84465-033-2 (paperback) Work on Chapter 3 was supported by British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British
    [Show full text]
  • Sociosemiotics and Metalanguage: the Case of Translanguaging Linguistic Frontiers
    Linguistic Frontiers • 3(2) • 57—65 • 2020 DOI: 10.2478/lf-2020-0015 Linguistic Frontiers Sociosemiotics and Metalanguage: The Case of Translanguaging Original Study Anti Randviir Department of Semiotics, University of Tartu, Estonia. Received: July 2020 ; Accepted: September 2020 Abstract: The age of transdiscipinarity has brought along the fading of boundaries between disciplines. This has engaged both the fusion of metalanguages that are used for the description of cultures and sign-proce- sses, and the launch of novel proposals for metalinguistic vocabularies. In the case of the study of culture, communication and sign-processes, it is natural that all such developments are connected with the paradigm of semiotics. At times the relevant metalinguistic and methodological proposals challenge traditional semiotic vocabulary, methods and methodological truths. This has brought along the need to recall the semiotic roots of the study of semiosis and communication, and to review transdisciplinary metalanguage in order to avoid possible misinterpretations or unnecessary repetitions of the established agreements in the paradigm of se- miotics as a possible ground for transdisciplinary study of human interaction and cultural processes. Howe- ver, besides occasional theoretical confusion, the spread of the semiotic methodology and vocabulary across applied scholarship has enriched semiotics in its faculties of field studies. Keywords : sociosemiotics, metalanguage, transdisciplinarity, modality, multimodality, mediality, coding, semiosis, modelling, translanguaging. Contemporary scholarship has, both in the domain of studies were founded. Secondly, it is useful to recall the humanities and social sciences, as also in the so-called proximity of interdisciplinary studies and interdisciplinary hard sciences, passed a fairly clear transition from mono- education as proposed by American pragmatism.
    [Show full text]
  • Definite Article of the English Language                 6HQLRU7KHVLV 'HSDUWPHQWRI/LQJXLVWLFV 6ZDUWKPRUH&ROOHJH 'HFHPEHU 1
    %HQMDPLQ5*HRUJH the Definite Article of the English Language 6HQLRU7KHVLV 'HSDUWPHQWRI/LQJXLVWLFV 6ZDUWKPRUH&ROOHJH 'HFHPEHU 1. Overview 1.1 Introduction The goal of this paper is to identify a viable analysis of the for use in semantic theories in ∗ the tradition of Montague (1974a,b). I shall argue that the sentiment expressed by Lewis (1983), and developed in more formal detail by von Heusinger (1997), is essentially correct, and that, when an analysis is placed in a suitable formal context, it is capable of accounting for a much greater range of phenomena than Lewis and von Heusinger consider. The basic claim is that the expression “the N” denotes the uniquely most salient N, when such an entity exists. I shall begin by enumerating every credible semantic effect attributed to “the” when used in connection with count nouns that I have encountered in the literature or noticed in the course of personal reflection on the subject. Sometimes several conflicting views on the same basic phenomenon will be condensed into one entry in the interests of compactness, and sometimes well known effects will be omitted altogether on the grounds that they seem not to be semantic at all, but to be of an entirely pragmatic, psychological, or metaphysical nature1. The decision to restrict my attention to count nouns is motivated by a desire to pick out a problem of reasonable size, and to avoid discussion of the difficult but tangential subject of the semantics of mass nouns. ∗ I would like to thank Rebecca Kuipers and David January for giving earlier drafts of this paper far more attentive readings than they were entitled to, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Semiotics: a Study of Images in Japanese Advertisements
    VISUAL SEMIOTICS: A STUDY OF IMAGES IN JAPANESE ADVERTISEMENTS RUMIKO OYAMA THESIS SUBMIITED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON iN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF LONDON NOVEMBER 1998 BIL LONDON U ABSTRACT 14 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 15 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 16 1.1 THE PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH 16 1.2 DEVELOPMENT OF RESEARCH INTERESTS 16 1.3 LANGUAGE VERSUS VISUALS AS A SEMIOTIC MODE 20 1.4 THE ASPECT OF VISUAL SEMIOTICS TO BE FOCUSED ON: Lexis versus Syntax 23 1.5 CULTURAL VALUE SYSTEMS IN VISUAL SYNTAX: A challenge to the notion of universality 24 Chapter Ii THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 26 2.1 INTRODUCTION 26 2.2 LITERATURE SURVEY ON STUDIES OF IMAGES 27 2.2.1 What is an image? 27 2.2.2 Art history/Art theories 29 2.2.3 Sociological approaches to visual images 36 2.2.4 Cultural approaches to visual images 44 2.2.4.1 Visual images as cultural products 45 2.2.4.2 Visual images from linguistic perspectives 50 2.2.5 Semiotic approaches to visual images 54 2.2.5.1 Saussure, Barthes (traditional semiology I semiotics) 54 2.2.5.2 Film semiotics 59 2 2.2.5.3 Social Semiotics 61 2.2.6 Reflection on the literature survey 66 2.3 A THEORY FOR A SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF THE VISUAL 71 2.3.1 Visual semiotics and the three metafunctions 72 2.3.1.1 The Ideational melafunction 73 2.3.1.2 The Textual metafunction 75 2.3.1.3 The Interpersonal metafunction 78 2.4 VERBAL TEXT IN VISUAL COMPOSITION: Critical Discourse Analysis 80 23 INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR A MULTI-MODAL ANALYSIS OF VISUAL AND VERBAL TEXTUAL OBJECTS
    [Show full text]
  • A Semiotic Perspective on the Denotation and Connotation of Colours in the Quran
    International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature E-ISSN: 2200-3452 & P-ISSN: 2200-3592 www.ijalel.aiac.org.au A Semiotic Perspective on the Denotation and Connotation of Colours in the Quran Mona Al-Shraideh1, Ahmad El-Sharif2* 1Post-Graduate Student, Department of English Language and Literature, Al-alBayt University, Jordan 2Associate Professor of Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, Al-alBayt University, Jordan Corresponding Author: Ahmad El-Sharif, E-mail: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history This study investigates the significance and representation of colours in the Quran from the Received: September 11, 2018 perspective of meaning and connotation according to the semiotic models of sign interpretation; Accepted: December 06, 2018 namely, Saussure’s dyadic approach and Peirce’s triadic model. Such approaches are used Published: January 31, 2019 to analyze colours from the perspective of cultural semiotics. The study presents both the Volume: 8 Issue: 1 semantic and cultural semiotics aspects of colour signs in the Quran to demonstrate the various Advance access: December 2018 semiotic meanings and interpretations of the six basic colours (white, black, red, green, yellow, and blue). The study reveals that Arabic colour system agrees with colour universals, especially in terms of their categorization and connotations, and that semiotic analysis makes Conflicts of interest: None an efficient device for analyzing and interpreting the denotations and connotations of colour Funding: None signs in the Quran. Key words: Semiotics, Signs, Denotation, Connotation, Colours, Quran INTRODUCTION or reading, a colour ‘term’ instead of seeing the chromatic Colours affect the behaviour by which we perceive the features of the colour.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Ii Review of Related Literature
    CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE This chapter covers the discussion of general theory of semiotics, general concept of Roland Barthes’ terms orders of signification that are denotative and connotative meaning and the definition of context and song lyrics in literature and also the preview of the previous studies. A. Definition of Semiotics Beyond the most basic definition as ―the study of signs‖, there is considerable variation among leading semioticians as to what semiotics involves. As Chandler (2002) cited from Eco (1976) that one of the broadest definitions is that of Umberto Eco, who states that ―semiotics is concerned with everything that can be taken as a sign‖. The study is involved by semiotics, not only as ―sign‖ of what we refer to call or say in daily speech, but as anything which ―stands for‖ something else. In the sense of semiotic, the form of words, images, sounds, gestures and objects are taken by the signs. Modern semioticians study the signs not in isolation but as part of ―sign-systems‖ of semiotics (such as a genre or medium or). They study how to make meanings and how to represent the reality. Knowledge to study human life’s sign is called Semiotics. It is acquiescent as the method of the study in the Association for Semiotics Studies’ first conference in 1974. A sign is something which means something else for someone. On the side of etymology, the Greek word 14 15 ―semeion” was taken to make the word of ―Semiotics‖ itself which has a ―sign‖ meaning. A sign thereat means a thing referring other thing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words: Consumer Perceptions of Agricultural Images
    A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words 47 A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: Consumer Perceptions of Agricultural Images Joy N. Rumble Christy Chiarelli Avery Culbertson Tracy A. Irani University of Florida Individuals interpret agricultural images differently according to the direct or cultural meanings they associate with the image, as well as the perspective through which they view the image. In addition, perceptions of agricultural images are commonly influenced by stereotypes. As agricultural communicators, it is important to understand the perceptions consumers have about agricultural images. Understanding these perceptions can allow communicators to use images in their communication that will promote favorable perceptions of the industry. To better understand consumers’ perceptions of agricultural images, this study asked consumers about their perceptions using focus group methodology. Four focus groups were completed with a total of 36 participants. The results indicated that elements of semiotics and perception theory were evident in the participants’ discussion. Thus, these theories combined with the results provide valuable information in regard to selecting images for communication that will create favorable responses among consumers. Keywords: semiotics, perception theory, focus groups, qualitative research, images Introduction The 1930 painting, American Gothic, featuring a man and woman dressed in farming apparel and holding a pitchfork, could be how many Americans envision agriculture, more than 80 years after the painting’s completion. While this painting may have some resemblance to the agriculture sector in the early part of the 20th century, it is now an outdated portrait that does not accurately reflect the innovative, technologically advanced industry. In fact, the American agriculture industry has seen rapid advancement from small, diversified, labor-intensive farms of the early 1900s to more innovative and specialized operations of the 21st century (Dimitri, Effland, & Conklin, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Umwelten in a Changing World
    Tartu Semiotics Library 18 Tartu Tartu Semiotics Library 18 Animal umwelten in a changing world: Zoosemiotic perspectives represents a clear and concise review of zoosemiotics, present- ing theories, models and methods, and providing interesting examples of human–animal interactions. The reader is invited to explore the umwelten of animals in a successful attempt to retrieve the relationship of people with animals: a cornerstone of the past common evolutionary processes. The twelve chapters, which cover recent developments in zoosemiotics and much more, inspire the reader to think about the human condition and about ways to recover our lost contact with the animal world. Written in a clear, concise style, this collection of articles creates a wonderful bridge between Timo Maran, Morten Tønnessen, human and animal worlds. It represents a holistic approach Kristin Armstrong Oma, rich with suggestions for how to educate people to face the dynamic relationships with nature within the conceptual Laura Kiiroja, Riin Magnus, framework of the umwelt, providing stimulus and opportuni- Nelly Mäekivi, Silver Rattasepp, ties to develop new studies in zoosemiotics. Professor Almo Farina, CHANGING WORLD A IN UMWELTEN ANIMAL Paul Thibault, Kadri Tüür University of Urbino “Carlo Bo” This important book offers the first coherent gathering of perspectives on the way animals are communicating with each ANIMAL UMWELTEN other and with us as environmental change requires increasing adaptation. Produced by a young generation of zoosemiotics scholars engaged in international research programs at Tartu, IN A CHANGING this work introduces an exciting research field linking the biological sciences with the humanities. Its key premises are that all animals participate in a dynamic web of meanings WORLD: and signs in their own distinctive styles, and all animal spe- cies have distinctive cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiotic and Marxist Theories: an Application
    Semiotic and Marxist Theories: An Application Prepared by Ernest Francis Jones 14 November 2016 Introduction Page 3 An Overview Page 3 Semiotics and its Application by Media Organizations Page 5 Semiotics and its Application in the U.S. Agricultural Sector Page 7 Marxist Theory, Ideology and Stereotypes Applied to U.S. Agriculture Page 7 Conclusion Page 10 Sources Consulted Page 11 2 Introduction The aim of this text is to illustrate how the use of images and or text, within a semiotic context, are employed by media organizations to convey meaning, often extending beyond the literal significance to which a photo or text refers. Additionally, I will also elucidate how images are used to influence, positively or negatively, the perceptions held by U.S. urban dwellers and others of the agricultural sector. Moreover, I will exemplify how Marxist theory can be applied to analyzing images which can contribute to broadening the connotative context towards a larger ideological message. Furthermore, I will elaborate on a limited sampling of the numerous semioticians who have advanced Semiotic theory during the past century. For the benefit of the reader(s) of this text, I will provide a comprehensive overview of semiotics, tracing its origin to the theory’s co- founders. My motivation for providing an overview is attributed to “a recognized variation among semioticians and academicians as to what semiotics involves” (Chandler, 1994, p. 12). An Overview According to Baldwin, Perry and Moffitt (2004), semiotics can be defined concisely as the study of signs. Moreover, Eco (1976) further elaborates “a sign is implicitly a communicative devise taking place between two human beings intentionally aiming to express or communicate something” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Text (PDF)
    Vol.7(3), pp. 59-66, March 2015 DOI: 10.5897/JMCS2014.0412 Article Number: ABC767050719 Journal of Media and Communication ISSN 2141 -2189 Copyright © 2015 Studies Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournlas.org/JMCS Full Length Research Paper Reinterpreting some key concepts in Barthes’ theory Sui Yan and Fan Ming* Foreign Languages Department, Beijing University of Agriculture, 7 Beinong Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102206, China. Received 16 September; 2014; Accepted 12 February, 2015 The paper makes clear some basic concepts in semiotic studies like signifier, signified and referent and core concepts in Roland Barthes’s theory are restudied with new developments especially in connotateurs, meta-language and meaning transfer, which play a key role in understanding how myth is constructed with the two mechanisms of naturalizing and generalizing. With the new understanding, the paper studies the representative signs from television and their semiotic function and concludes that meaning transfer is the fundamental way for media signs to construct new meanings. Key words: semiotics, Barthes, media signs INTRODUCTION Signification, denotation, connotation and meta- community’ (Cullen, 1976: 19) buys into. But for Barthes, language the culmination of meaning created by signifier plus signified is more than just a system of random naming or It is Ferdinand de Saussure who makes the important nomenclature. It is subject to a rich layering of meaning distinction between signifier and signified of a sign according to each country’s cultures. Barthes (1981) and (Saussure, 1915/1966), which incurs persistent and Moriarty (1991) extend the study of signs in culture, and diversified study on the structural characteristics of signs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Biosemiotics
    Biosemiotics (2009) 2:221–245 DOI 10.1007/s12304-009-9042-8 ORIGINAL PAPER A Short History of Biosemiotics Marcello Barbieri Received: 20 March 2009 /Accepted: 14 April 2009 / Published online: 6 May 2009 # Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Biosemiotics is the synthesis of biology and semiotics, and its main purpose is to show that semiosis is a fundamental component of life, i.e., that signs and meaning exist in all living systems. This idea started circulating in the 1960s and was proposed independently from enquires taking place at both ends of the Scala Naturae. At the molecular end it was expressed by Howard Pattee’s analysis of the genetic code, whereas at the human end it took the form of Thomas Sebeok’s investigation into the biological roots of culture. Other proposals appeared in the years that followed and gave origin to different theoretical frameworks, or different schools, of biosemiotics. They are: (1) the physical biosemiotics of Howard Pattee and its extension in Darwinian biosemiotics by Howard Pattee and by Terrence Deacon, (2) the zoosemiotics proposed by Thomas Sebeok and its extension in sign biosemiotics developed by Thomas Sebeok and by Jesper Hoffmeyer, (3) the code biosemiotics of Marcello Barbieri and (4) the hermeneutic biosemiotics of Anton Markoš. The differences that exist between the schools are a consequence of their different models of semiosis, but that is only the tip of the iceberg. In reality they go much deeper and concern the very nature of the new discipline. Is biosemiotics only a new way of looking at the known facts of biology or does it predict new facts? Does biosemiotics consist of testable hypotheses? Does it add anything to the history of life and to our understanding of evolution? These are the major issues of the young discipline, and the purpose of the present paper is to illustrate them by describing the origin and the historical development of its main schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiotics and Marketing
    Linköping University- Master Thesis Semiotics and Marketing LIU-IKK/MPLCE-A--11/03—SE Master Thesis Semiotics and Marketing A Case Study of the Renault Co. on Iranian Market Parisa Sepehr Supervisor: Pamela Vang Linköping University Department of Culture and Communication Language and Culture in Europe Spring 2011 - 1 - Linköping University- Master Thesis Semiotics and Marketing Title: Semiotics and Marketing A Case Study of the Renault Co. on Iranian Market A thesis on Master of Language and Culture in Europe Department of Culture and Communication Author: Parisa Sepehr ([email protected]) Supervisor: Pamela Vang Advisors: Dr. Firouzeh Khalatbari & Claude Ingaud Jaubert - 2 - Linköping University- Master Thesis Semiotics and Marketing This thesis is dedicated to: My mother, Mahin Behyan - Sepehr & My boss, Claude Ingaud Jaubert - 3 - Linköping University- Master Thesis Semiotics and Marketing Acknowledgments I would like to thank many people who have contributed to my thesis, encouraged me to continue my academic education and enriched my life. First and foremost I would like to thank my thesis supervisor and advisors who read my numerous revisions and guided me out of many confusing subjects scattered through my initial thesis draft. Supervisor Ms. Pamela Vang: Pamela, thank you so much for all of your support. I know well supervising a master student from long distance is not easy but you helped me and I had your full support when I was in Iran and also when I came back to Sweden. Advisors Dr. Firouzeh Khalatbari: Firouzeh, I know well you are extremely busy with many projects but you accepted to advise and guide me to my thesis.
    [Show full text]