Barton Seagrave Primary School Providing New Teaching Spaces to Accommodate a Three Form Entry School

## Agenda Item No: 6b

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE

30 July 2013

REPORT BY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING

Application 13/00012/CCDFUL for the extension and refurbishment of Barton Seagrave Primary School providing new teaching spaces to accommodate a three form entry school. The Subject: proposals also includes improvements to external areas and on

site parking, Barton Seagrave Primary School, Belvoir Drive, Barton Seagrave, Kettering NN15 6QY

NCC (Property Asset Management) Applicant:

That this application be granted planning permission subject to Recommendations: the conditions in Appendix 1

1. Purpose of Report 1.1 The purpose of this report is to provide the Committee with professional planning advice on any issues, development plan policies and other material considerations relevant to the determination of the planning application. 2. Relevant Priority Outcomes Our perspectives and priority outcomes show how we will go about achieving our vision: “Proud to make Northamptonshire a great place to live and work”

Perspective Outcome

Customers - to achieve our vision, A cleaner, greener and more prosperous what will our customers see? County

3. Background 3.1 Barton Seagrave Primary School is a two form entry school (420 pupil capacity with 416 pupils on the school roll). The school was historically separate infant and junior schools but was subsequently amalgamated in name although it remains two separate buildings for junior and infant pupils. The existing buff brick buildings are single storey with a mixture of flat and low angled pitch roofs. The school buildings are not listed, are not located within a Conservation Area and are located in an area considered to be at low probability of flooding (Flood Zone 1). 3.2 The school is in a residential area and is accessed from the east via a single lane and footpath from Belvoir Drive which runs through Wallis Spinney. Alternative pedestrian routes into the site are available through the adjacent Latimer Arts School immediately to the north. Surrounding the southern and western site boundaries are the gardens of residential properties located on Fitzwilliam Drive and Grosvenor Way respectively. These properties are separated from the school buildings by the existing playing fields and established hedgerows and trees. 3.3 Wallis Spinney runs along the length of the eastern boundary of the site. According to the County Council’s records Wallis Spinney is named after a local farmer, Samuel Wallis. Wallis Spinney was part of a hall and estate owned since the 18th century by Richard Tibbits. In 1904 it was bought by Charles Wicksteed from the Tibbits family. It is thought that most trees were planted in the 17th century, although it is probable that woodland was present prior to this. There is evidence of coppicing, hedge-laying and a boundary ditch, possibly from a medieval field system. Today it is owned by the Wicksteed Trust and leased to Barton Seagrave Residents Association Pocket Park Committee. It is managed by the Wallis Spinney Pocket Park Group. 4. Proposal 4.1 The County Council as the Local Education Authority is facing unprecedented demand for primary school places in Northamptonshire. This demand for primary school places is a well-publicised national issue that in the context of Northamptonshire combines the national rise in the birth rate with high levels of immigration to the county. There is a Government commitment to provide choice and diversity for parents and this is difficult to achieve when there is no surplus capacity in the system. 4.2 To increase primary places in the Barton Seagrave area it is proposed to increase the intake at the subject site to three form entry. The proposed changes would allow the school to increase its intake from 420 to 630 pupils with approximately 15 additional staff members bringing staff numbers on site to 75 (35 full time, 40 part time). It is proposed that the site would continue to provide breakfast and after school clubs for children attending the school. 4.3 To enable the expansion a number of works are proposed and in terms of the proposed built development these can be separated into six key parts: The main extension is proposed to link the two existing school buildings and would provide three new Year Two classrooms and one new Year Three classroom. The classes would be accessed from a central breakout corridor with toilet and storage areas. This part of the extension would also provide a new entrance and reception area, a medical room, and five offices. Adjacent to the north of the proposed main extension it is proposed to increase the footprint of an existing Year Three classroom by extending it outward to the east. The extension would bring the classroom size into line with guidance on recommended class sizes. A small infill extension on the north elevation at the Junior School, in conjunction with significant internal alterations, is proposed to create two Year Four classrooms. Again in conjunction with internal alterations, infilling on the west elevation at the existing Junior School is proposed to create a further classroom and large storage area. A larger infill, which would in reality project from the existing line of the boundary, is proposed on the west elevation at the Infant School to create an additional Year One classroom.

An extension is also proposed at the north-east corner of the Junior School to create two new classrooms and accompanying cloakrooms and stores for Year 5 and Year 6. 4.4 It is not proposed to match the existing brickwork but rather use alternative materials that are intended to complement the existing colour and appearance of the school. The application sets out proposals to use coloured render and timber cladding with coloured glazing in places. 4.5 To facilitate improvements in parking and access at the site these proposals include the demolition of the disused Premises Manager’s house and garage. The existing site has 24 parking spaces and two disabled spaces whereas the proposed scheme would increase that number to 51 parking spaces plus and four disabled spaces along with a minibus bay. The proposals would also see the removal of the existing mobile classrooms which are located to the east and west of the infant school building. 4.6 Lighting and landscaping schemes have also been submitted and the latter includes proposals to replace the school wildlife garden that has been removed between the main school buildings. 4.7 There are currently 18 uncovered cycle spaces on site with the expansion proposing to increase this provision to forty spaces (18 covered). 5. Consultation 5.1 The following is a summary of the responses received during the consultation on this application. 5.2 Kettering Borough Council (KBC) Planning – No objection subject to conditions. In particular KBC considers the proposals are acceptable in principle and in terms of design, visual amenity, impact on neighbours and impact on the adjacent Wallis Spinney (protected by a Tree Preservation Order (TPO)). KBC has asked that conditions secure the following: Materials used in the construction of the buildings to match those set out in the application. A revised arboricultural report to be submitted which acknowledges the adjacent Wallis Spinney and details how it will be protected, including details of no dig zones, a scheme of root protection and existing and finished ground levels with the root zone areas. 5.3 While not objecting to the proposals, KBC did raise concerns that the proposed parking design is not acceptable. In particular KBC considers that the disabled and mini-bus parking bays are inadequate in size and that the proposed back to back parking bays are not in accordance with policy. 5.4 A revised arboricultural report has since been submitted by the applicant and was sent to KBC for further comment. No further response has been received from KBC on this matter. 5.5 KBC Environmental Health Officer (EHO) – No objection. 5.6 Highway Authority – No objection. Following KBC’s concerns regarding parking the matter was discussed further with the Highway Authority. The Highway Authority does not share KBC’s concerns regarding the proposed back to back parking as the school can manage this matter on site although Highways acknowledge that their view would be different if it was a commercial arrangement rather than a school site.

5.7 Barton Seagrave Parish Council – No objection subject to a condition securing the use of the additional parking bays within the site for parents/guardians dropping off and picking up their children. This requested condition reflects the parish’s concerns about a 50 percent increase in traffic movements and corresponding increases in congestion on Belvoir Drive and the surrounding areas at peak times, including the junction of Woodland Avenue/Barton Road where improvement works are proposed but yet to be undertaken. 5.8 Sport England – No objection but requested a condition requiring full details of the proposed construction compound and access to be submitted with any affected areas of soft play area to be restored following completion of the development. 5.9 Environment Agency – No objection and provided reference to their Flood Risk Standing Advice (FRSA). This advice requires the applicant to consider the surface water management good practice advice in their application. 5.10 The Crime Prevention Design Adviser (CPDA) at Northamptonshire Police – No formal objection to the proposed development but recommends: The development complies with the requirements of Secured by Design for Schools 2010 (www.securedbydesign.com) in so far as is practical. All ground floor windows and others that are easily accessible meet BS7950 or equivalent with laminated glazing to 6.8 millimetres minimum thickness. All external doors to conform to PAS23/PAS247 or equivalent with access control to staff room and office areas. Access control to all external entrances used by the public with a double set of doors to the main entrance to provide an air lock operated from reception. 5.11 County Archaeological Advisor – Based on the Historic Environment Record the County Archaeological Advisor considers that there is little potential for below ground archaeological activity within the development area and therefore no archaeological investigation is required. 5.12 Western Power Distribution (WPD) – Responded with an extract from their mapping system detailing their equipment within the vicinity of the site. According to WPD’s records there are two underground cables which supply the buildings. 5.13 Anglian Water – No comment.

6. Public Advertisement and Neighbour Notification 6.1 The application has been advertised by means of site notices, a press notice in the Northampton Evening Telegraph on 18 April 2013 and by direct notification to 59 properties within the vicinity of the application site. One response has been received from a resident in the area noting that the expansion is likely to increase road traffic at drop off and collection times. The respondent raised concerns at the focus of the transport statement on movements at the entrance to the school and a perceived failure of the application to assess movements at other drop off sites around the school. In particular the respondent pointed to Grosvenor Way and Castle Way which provide access to the school via the pedestrian walkway through Latimer Arts School. With regard to Castle Way, the respondent reports that this practice leads to congestion and inconsiderate parking in the area. To address this issue the respondent has requested a study be undertaken to determine if it is necessary to

impose traffic control measures at the drop off and collection points that are used by parents beyond the immediate entrance to the primary school.

7. Development Plan Policies 7.1 The following planning policy is considered to be relevant to the proposal, as follows: North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008): Policy 13 (General Sustainable Development Principles).

8. Assessment 8.1 The main issues to consider in determining this application are: i) Whether the proposal accords with the Development Plan; and ii) Whether there are design, traffic, highway safety, amenity, or other matters to justify refusal of the application. National Planning Policy Framework 8.2 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and related technical guidance were released on 27 March 2012. The NPPF sets out the Government’s planning policies for England and how these are expected to be applied. National policy statements form part of the overall framework of national planning policy, and are a material planning consideration in decisions on planning applications. Paragraph 72 of the NPPF states that the Government attaches great importance to ensuring that there is a sufficient choice of school places available in order to meet the needs of both existing and new communities. In order to ensure this requirement can be met, local planning authorities should take a proactive, positive and collaborative approach to development that will widen choice and availability of school places and gives great weight to the need to create, expand or alter schools. 8.3 The NPPF establishes a presumption in favour of sustainable development. For decision taking, this means that proposals for development that accord with the development plan shall be approved without delay. Development Plan 8.4 Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy provides general criteria against which to consider proposals for development and requires proposals to be of a high standard of design that respects and enhances the character of its surroundings. It is also specified in Policy 13 that proposals should not result in an unacceptable impact on the amenities of neighbouring properties in the wider area. It is therefore necessary to consider the proposals in the context of this Development Plan policy. Design and Appearance 8.5 The proposed design and appearance of the school is discussed in section 2 of this report. The junior and infant schools have been amalgamated in name and this development would also join the two buildings. Containing the main development within the centre of the site and between the two existing buildings provides a number of benefits, not least of all minimising the potential impacts of the development on surrounding properties. The various other extensions have been carefully located and designed to maximise the teaching space available while minimising impacts on outside play areas. Similarly the single storey nature of the

proposals, with some taller elements, is broadly in keeping with the existing buildings and minimises the potential visual amenity impacts while providing some interest to the eastern elevation at the front the school. 8.6 The introduction of alternative materials at the site to break up the existing brick structures is supported. The application sets out proposals to use coloured render and timber cladding which are intended to reflect the existing buff brickwork and the wooded backdrop of Wallis Spinney. Coloured glazing is also proposed in places to provide further interest. A recommended condition requires the materials to be in accordance with those set out in the application. 8.7 A clearly defined entrance is also proposed that would include the schools emblem set within the timber clad facade and would help draw visitors to reception. The admin and staff areas are to be located in the centre of the extension with teaching spaces on either side. The facilities that would be available for out of hours use are also located in this area and would allow this space to be used outside of school hours without opening up the wider school. 8.8 The proposed extensions would allow the school to operate with 21 classes with the appropriate supplementary facilities and would support the existing circulation routes for pupils within their year groups and key stages. 8.9 Overall, the location, appearance and design of the extensions are considered to be acceptable having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy. In particular the design and appearance of the school will enhance the character of its surroundings and will not result in loss of light or overlooking and will not detract from visual amenity for neighbouring properties. Traffic and Highway Safety 8.10 Traffic and highway safety need to be considered having regard to the development plan and taking account of the consultation response and representations on this matter. 8.11 The applicant has submitted a transport statement in support of their planning application. The statement recognises that the proposed extensions would increase the capacity of the school from 420 to 630 pupils and staff numbers from 60 to 75. Based on the results of the travel survey of pupils and students the report sets out that this increase in pupil numbers would generate an estimated 122 additional two- way vehicle movements during the morning peak hour period. An additional 11 staff movements would also be created. It is concluded in the statement that the additional vehicle movements would not have a significant adverse impact on the highway network. Based on the recorded accident data the report considers that the predicted increase in vehicle trips would not significantly affect safety on the neighbouring roads or junctions. 8.12 It is acknowledged that the increase in pupils will have some implications for local amenity, traffic and highway safety. A representation has been received from a local resident regarding parking and increased traffic congestion that would result from this development and in particular the respondent has raised concerns around parking to the north of the Latimer Arts School with pupils accessing Barton Seagrave Primary on foot. Barton Seagrave Parish Council also has concerns around congestion and this is reflected in their response of no objection subject to a condition securing access for parents and guardians to the car park at pick up and drop off times. This is currently permitted for the breakfast and after school clubs but is not allowed at peak times.

8.13 Issues around congestion emerge in respect of nearly all school sites and at the start and end of the school day there are short periods when the traffic around schools increases significantly as some parents travel by car and drop off and collect their children from school. These issues can be exacerbated by inconsiderate parking and driving which it is accepted do occur but are beyond the control of the County Planning Authority and the applicant. The Highway Authority has been consulted on this application and has concluded that notwithstanding the increase in pupil numbers, there is no highway safety reason to justify refusing the application. On this basis it is not considered necessary to require the applicant to provide further information on this topic. Despite the expanded parking and improved layout for traffic circulation it is considered that the Parish Council’s request to allow parents to drop off and pick up pupils from the car park is unfeasible. In particular the existing access road to the car park is approximately 60m long and only 3.9m wide and in its current form would not allow safe two-way traffic flows at peak times. If the school was required to widen the access road this would necessitate the purchase of land from within Wallis Spinney and the removal of trees from within the TPO area. As well as widening the access the use of the revised car park at peak times would necessitate revisions to the proposed parking layout to minimise congestion. It is not recommended that the Parish Council’s request be conditioned to any permission. 8.14 The Highway Authority requires schools to prepare a travel plan as this is the means by which schools manage travel and encourage staff and parents to utilise other means of travel rather than the private car. A travel plan was submitted with the planning application and has been approved by the Highway Authority. Implementation of the approved travel plan would help minimise impacts on highway safety and local amenity but it is acknowledged it will not eliminate these impacts, which are likely to increase as the numbers of pupils increase. 8.15 Closely related to the proposals to expand the school are the plans to enlarge the existing car park to increase the current parking provision on site from 26 spaces including two disabled parking spaces to 56 spaces, including four disabled spaces and a minibus space. Northamptonshire County Council’s Supplementary Parking Guidance (2003) suggests that 55 parking spaces should be provided on the site and suggests that there should be six disabled spaces with three marked for exclusive use. KBC raised concerns at the proposals for back to back car parking spaces but these concerns are not shared by the Highway Authority who considers the school should be able to control this effectively. A recommended condition requires a scheme to be submitted setting out how these spaces will be managed in practice although it is noted the school already manage this issue with their existing car park arrangements. KBC also suggested that two of the disabled bays should provide for additional space for access and noted that the minibus bay is the minimum size required. Once again the provisions proposed are broadly in line with guidance and are for the school to manage. If additional disabled spaces are required the spaces adjacent to the minibus bay could be used although this is unlikely to be required and the proposals meet the minimum number of marked disabled spaces. On the whole it is considered that the scheme makes good use of the available space and there are no objections from the Highway Authority. The proposed layout and parking provision is a significant improvement on the existing arrangement. 8.16 There are currently 18 uncovered cycle spaces on site. The supplementary parking guidance suggests that five spaces should be provided per classroom. It is not considered reasonable to require the applicant to install 105 spaces at the commencement of the development but rather to provide the proposed 40 spaces

(including a minimum of 18 covered spaces) initially and to subsequently review the provision annually in conjunction with the required review of the travel plan to ensure that the number of cycle spaces is always sufficient to meet peak demand. This approach has been agreed at other sites and is again considered reasonable and is secured by recommended condition. 8.17 Access for vehicles, including HGVs, involved in the construction works can also have implications for highway safety. Construction access is proposed via the existing vehicular access off Belvoir Road and a recommended condition requires the applicant to submit detail of the proposed internal access roads and construction compound areas. Subject to this condition, a construction management plan and restrictions on the timing of entry and exit of construction vehicles it is considered that the impact of construction access can be safely managed. More specifically it is recommended that construction working hours are restricted to between the hours of 07.30 and 17.30 Mondays to Fridays and 08.00 and 13.00 hours on Saturdays with no construction access to the site between 08.15 and 09.00 and 14.45 and 15.45 on Mondays to Fridays during term time. In addition a recommended condition requires that any areas of playing field affected by the works be reinstated following completion of these works. A recommended condition also requires the applicant to ensure the road is kept clear of mud, dust and debris. 8.18 It is acknowledged that the increase from a two form entry to a three form entry would have some implications for traffic and highway safety, and this is raised in the representation from a local resident and the response from Barton Seagrave Parish Council. The Highway Authority has been consulted on this application and has concluded that notwithstanding the increase in pupil numbers, there is no highway safety reason to justify refusing the application. It is not considered that the parish’s request to open the car park to parents at pick up and drop off times is practical and this has not been taken forward. The proposals do include a significant increase to the current parking provision and this would help reduce the numbers of staff vehicles parking in surrounding streets and makes good use of the available space on the school site. In conjunction with the required implementation of the measures set out in the approved travel plan it is considered that the development will not have an adverse impact on the highway network or highway safety that would justify refusal of this application. While some highway impacts are anticipated during construction and from the increase in pupil numbers these impacts must be balanced against the statutory requirement for school places to meet educational needs and the increased demand for primary school places, which is significant and carries great weight in support of the application. Recommended conditions require the implementation of the school travel plan, a construction management plan and the provision of the proposed cycle spaces. Subject to these conditions the proposals are considered to be acceptable having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy and will not have an adverse impact on the highway network or highway safety that would justify refusal of the application. Amenity Impacts 8.19 Potential amenity impacts also need to be carefully considered against Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy. The main potential for amenity impacts is considered above in relation to traffic and highway safety. In terms of other potential amenity impacts Barton Seagrave Primary School benefits from a large site and significant separation distances to neighbouring properties. While these proposals are for a significant increase in floor space they have been carefully designed to link the two buildings and in doing so minimise the increase in footprint

toward sensitive receptors. Furthermore a continuation of the single storey theme is appropriate to the existing scale of the school. The benefits of the site and the design are reflected in the absence of responses regarding amenity issues except where they relate to traffic. 8.20 The nearest neighbour to the proposed built development is at Latimer Arts College north of the site with the closest residential properties to the proposed works being approximately 750 metres south of the site along Fitzwilliam Drive. As outlined with regard to highway access, amenity impacts during construction would be controlled through a required construction management plan and restricted working hours with construction only having a short term impact. Once built it is considered that the impacts of the development could be controlled to an acceptable level. This is supported by the absence of objections to the proposed development by statutory consultees. 8.21 Lighting also has the potential to impact on amenity but is discussed in more detail in paragraph 8.26 relating to sustainability and energy efficiency. 8.22 It is considered that the proposed development, in conjunction with the recommended conditions, should not have any significant adverse impacts on local amenity. The proposed location, scale and nature of the development is acceptable and the school benefits from its separation to sensitive receptors. The required construction management plan, conditions restricting working hours and noise will minimise potential amenity impacts in line with the requirements of Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy. Sustainability & Energy Efficiency 8.23 Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy sets out general criteria to promote sustainable development. The NPPF (paragraphs 93 - 98) supports the delivery of renewable and low carbon energy recognises that even small scale projects provide a valuable contribution to cutting greenhouse gas emissions. 8.24 A sustainability report has been submitted with the application and sets out proposals for high efficiency natural gas boilers and photovoltaic (PV) panels to achieve a nominal nine percent carbon dioxide emission reduction. PV has been chosen as it is considered to be cost effective, low maintenance and less visually obtrusive. In this case it is proposed to locate the PV panels on the roof of the proposed staffroom with views of the panels to be concealed by the taller classrooms and main entrance and the proposed timber cladding on the east elevation. 8.25 Due to cost constraints and the requirements of the client the building will not be officially recognised by BREEAM but the applicant has set out that the application has been designed in the spirit of the requirements covered by a ‘Very Good’ rating. 8.26 A lighting scheme has been submitted with the application which includes column lighting for the access road and car park with bulkhead lighting proposed for the buildings. It is considered that the scheme could be improved to minimise potential light pollution, impacts on biodiversity and maximise sustainability and security benefits. In particular bulkhead lighting can be inefficient and create glare which can in turn detract from the intended safety and security benefits as well as introducing potential amenity impacts. A recommended condition requires a revised lighting scheme to be submitted, including a layout plan that covers all new proposed lighting and shows detail of proposed beam orientation, a schedule of equipment (luminaire type, mounting height, aiming angles and luminaire profiles). Also required is a lighting contour map to show the distribution of light the scheme would generate and

detail of the proposed hours and days of operation for the lighting and how this would be controlled. The information submitted would need to demonstrate that there will no adverse impact on residential amenity, biodiversity and that the proposals will maximise security and sustainability benefits. 8.27 Subject to recommended conditions it is considered that the proposed development is acceptable in terms of sustainability and energy efficiency in line with Policy 14 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy. Playing Fields 8.28 Sport England has responded to the consultation with no objection subject to submission of a scheme setting out the proposed construction access within the site and the construction compound area with any impacts on soft play area to be reinstated. Contaminated Land 8.29 A preliminary investigation report has been submitted with the application. A recommended condition addresses the event of contamination not previously identified being encountered and the required investigation, risk assessments and remediation that would subsequently be required. It is considered that risks from land contamination can be overcome and that the development can be carried out without unacceptable risks to workers, pupils or neighbouring residents. Archaeology 8.30 The County Archaeological Advisor has no comments on this application as the Historic Environment Records shows that there are no relevant archaeological records within the development area. No further archaeological work is therefore required. Other Matters 8.31 It is stated in the application that the design has been developed with attention to Secure by Design requirements. The Crime Prevention Design Advisor has no objection in principle to the proposed development but has made a number of recommendations which are included as a recommended informative. The required lighting scheme will need to demonstrate that is maximises security benefits. Overall the proposals as they relate to security are considered to be acceptable. 8.32 Following consultation responses the applicant submitted a revised Arboricultural Impact Assessment (AIA). In particular the revised AIA acknowledges the TPO at Wallis Spinney. A total of 24 individual trees and three tree groups are identified in the submitted AIA. All of these trees are located within the site except for two which are in Wallis Spinney. The development necessitates the removal of 17 trees and two tree groups. These trees have since been removed with the works undertaken prior to the start of the bird nesting season in 2013. One for one replacement is proposed and a recommended condition requires submission of a revised landscaping scheme. The AIA sets out protection measures for the retained trees. These measures include the pre-emptive root pruning of a tree located in Wallis Spinney adjacent to an area proposed for parking. It is considered that tree protection can be secured by the imposition of a planning condition which requires the final detailed Arboricultural Method Statement to be submitted and approved prior to commencement of development. Subject to this condition the retained vegetation can be protected in the interests of visual amenity and biodiversity in accordance with Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy.

8.33 A landscaping scheme has been submitted and includes proposals for a significant amount of planting around the site. The scheme incorporates planting for a wide variety of non-native species and it is considered that these do not provide sufficient mitigation for the removed trees and as such a revised scheme is required by condition. It is expected that the revised scheme will include additional native trees that will mature to become larger trees and provide long term landscape and biodiversity benefits. 8.34 A Flood Risk Assessment was submitted with the application. The site is located in an area considered to be at low probability of flooding (Flood Zone 1). It is proposed to collect the surface water from the new roof and hard paved areas into gravity operated drains and outfall to the existing stormwater sewers via a control chamber to limit the rate of discharge to the existing flow rates. It is proposed that underground storage is used to attenuate these flows and would necessitate excavations of the existing playing field to the west of the school buildings. A recommended condition requires that this area be reinstated to a condition in line with the existing playing fields. A continuation of existing infiltration techniques are proposed for the car park and the small infill extension on the northern elevation which would connect to an existing soakaway. Foul water would continue to be disposed of via the existing infrastructure. Subject to these measures the development will not contribute further to flood risk and is in accordance with the NPPF.

9. Conclusions 9.1 It is proposed to expand Barton Seagrave Primary from two form to three form entry with an increase in pupil numbers from 420 to 630 in order to help accommodate the increasing number of primary-aged children in the area. Four additional classrooms, a staff room, reception, offices and toilet facilities are proposed between the infant and junior school buildings. Also proposed is the infilling of areas on the north and west elevations to create improve classroom space and storage. Finally an extension is proposed in the north-east corner of the site to create two further classrooms and associated facilities. The proposed extensions are single storey in height. Improvements to parking and access are also proposed and would necessitate the removal of existing mobile classrooms and the disused Premises Manager’s building and garage. The location, appearance and design of the extensions are considered to be acceptable having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy. In particular the design and appearance of the school will enhance the character of its surroundings and will not result in loss of light or overlooking and will not detract from visual amenity for neighbouring properties. 9.2 The main issues relating to these proposals are traffic and highway safety and corresponding amenity impacts. It is acknowledged that the increase from a two form entry to a three form entry will have some implications for traffic and highway safety, and this is raised in the representation from a local resident and the response from Barton Seagrave Parish Council. The Highway Authority has been consulted on this application and has no objection to the proposed development. It is not considered that the Parish Council’s request to open the car park to parents at pick up and drop off times is practical and this has not been taken forward. The proposals do include a significant increase to the current parking provision and this would help remove some of the staff vehicles from surrounding streets and makes good use of the available

space. In conjunction with the required implementation of the measures set out in the approved travel plan it is considered that the development will not have an adverse impact on the highway network or highway safety that would justify refusal of this application. While some highway impacts are anticipated during construction and from the increase in pupil numbers these impacts must be balanced against the statutory requirement for school places to meet educational needs. The increased demand for primary school places is significant and the NPPF gives great weight to the need to create, expand or alter schools. It is considered that the need for the development outweighs the negative impacts relating to traffic and amenity and the proposed development is acceptable having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy.

10. List of Appendices Appendix 1: Recommended Planning Conditions

Author: Name: Mark Laurenson Team: Planning Services Contact details: Tel: 01604 367197 Fax: 01604 366065 Email: [email protected] Background Papers: None

Does the report propose a key decision is NO taken? If yes, is the decision in the Forward N/A Plan? Will further decisions be required? If so, NO please outline the timetable here Is this report proposing an amendment to NO the budget and/or policy framework? Have the financial implications been NO. There are none relevant to the cleared by the Strategic Finance Manager determination of the planning application (SFM)? Name of SFM: N/A Have any capital spend implications been N/A cleared by the Capital Asset Investment Group (CAIG) Has the report been cleared by the NO but cleared by Assistant Director relevant Corporate Director or ACE? Environment and Planning Has the relevant Cabinet Member been NO consulted? Has the relevant scrutiny committee been NO consulted? Has the report been cleared by Legal NO Services? Have any communications issues been N/A cleared by Communications and Marketing? Has an Equalities Impact Assessment NO. There are no equal opportunity been carried out in relation to this report? implications relevant to this application. Are there any community safety These are considered in the report.

implications? Are there any environmental implications: These are considered in the report.

Are there any Health & Safety NO Implications: Are there any Human Resources NO Implications: Are there any human rights implications: This planning application has been processed in accordance with the prescribed Town and Country Planning legislation and regulations. These afford individuals the rights to have their say on the development proposed and for the impacts of the development to be assessed having regard to the potential for impact on any individual, and the decision to be made taking into account any views expressed. The most relevant parts of the Human Rights Act are: Article 6 (Right to a Fair Trial); Article 8 (Right to Privacy); Article 10 (Freedom of Expression); and Protocol No1 which entitles every person to peaceful enjoyment of his/her possessions.

Constituency Interest: NCC Ward: Wicksteed

Agenda Item No: 6b - Appendix 1 – Recommended Planning Conditions

Commencement

1. The development to which this permission relates must be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of this permission. Written notification of the date of commencement shall be sent to the County Planning Authority within seven days of such commencement.

Reason: To conform with the requirements of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. Scope of Permission

2. Except as otherwise required by conditions attached to this planning permission the development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved documents and plans:

Planning Application Forms dated 28 March 2013 Site Location Plan drawing no. S4 revision B dated June 2012 Proposed Site Plan drawing no. SK06 revision D dated 9 August 2012 Proposed Ground Flood Plan drawing no. SK03 revision C dated 2 August 2012 Proposed Elevations drawing no. SK07 revision B dated 31 January 2013 PV Panel Location drawing no. 120895/M/1800 Rev T1 dated February 2013 Planning Statement reference CC/JEJK/VW/Sch.201 dated 14 March 2013 Design and Access Statement reference CC/JEJK/VW.Sch.201 dated 14 March 2013 Transport Statement reference 4955R001 TS dated March 2013 Flood Risk Assessment reference R-FRA-Q6127FA-01-A dated March 2013 Ecological Assessment reference DMB/770420/R1 revision 3 dated 27 March 2013 Environmental Impact Statement reference 120895 dated September 2012 Sustainability Report reference 120895 dated September 2012 Ground Investigation Report reference STJ2236A-G01 Revision 0 dated August 2012

Reason: To specify the approved documents and plans in the interests of amenity and the environment having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Construction Management

3. Prior to the commencement of any part of the development hereby permitted, a Construction Management Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the County Planning Authority. The Construction Management Plan shall include and specify the provision to be made for the following: i. Overall strategy for managing environmental impacts which arise during construction; ii. Proposals for informing neighbouring properties of the construction programme, including contact details for the site manager on site; iii. Measures to control the emission of dust and dirt during construction; iv. Control of noise emanating from the site during the construction period; v. Construction Plant Directional signage (on and off site); vi. Provision for emergency vehicles; vii. Provision for all site operatives, visitors and construction vehicles loading and unloading plant and materials; viii. Details of delivery times; ix. Provision for all site operatives, visitors and construction vehicles for parking and turning within the site during the construction period; x. Details of measures to prevent mud and other such material migrating onto the highway from construction vehicles; xi. Storage of plant and materials used in constructing the development; and xii. Waste audit and scheme for waste minimisation and recycling/disposing of waste resulting from construction works.

The approved Construction Management Plan shall be implemented as approved throughout the construction period.

Reason: In the interests of residential amenity, highway safety and visual amenity having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Hours of Construction

4. Except as further restricted by condition 5, all construction works shall be confined to the hours of 7.30am to 5.30pm Mondays to Fridays and 8.00am to 1.00pm on Saturdays, with no works on Sundays, Bank or Public Holidays.

Reason: To protect the amenities of neighbouring properties from noise and other disturbance having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Hours of Working - Construction Delivery

5. Construction vehicles shall not enter or leave the site between the hours of 8.15am to 9.30am and 2.45pm to 3.45pm Mondays to Fridays during term time.

Reason: In the interests of amenity and highway safety having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Arboricultural Report

6. Except as otherwise required by conditions attached to this planning permission the development shall be undertaken in accordance with the submitted Arboricultural Impact Assessment Revision 6 dated 10 June 2013.

Reason: To ensure that retained trees, shrubs and hedgerows are protected from damage in the interests of visual amenity and biodiversity, having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Arboricultural Method Statement

7. No development shall take place, nor equipment, machinery or materials shall be brought on to the site for the purpose of development, until an Arboricultural Method Statement for the protection of trees, shrubs and hedgerows to be retained within the vicinity of the development has been submitted to and approved in writing by the County Planning Authority. The Arboricultural Method Statement shall be prepared in accordance with the guidelines contained in BS5837:2012 (Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction). The protection measures shall be appropriate to the scale and duration of the development hereby permitted and shall include: i. A Tree Protection Plan that clearly shows any trees that are to be removed as well as those trees in the vicinity of the development that are to be retained, including the location of protective measures proposed around any Root Protection Area, Construction Exclusion Zone and/or Ground Protection Zones; ii. A schedule of tree works for all the retained trees specifying pruning and other remedial or preventative work; iii. Details of development supervision by a suitably qualified, competent and experienced person; and iv. Timing and methods of site visiting and record keeping and provision of monitoring to the Arboricultural Clerk of Works and the County Planning Authority.

The approved Arboricultural Method Statement shall be implemented as approved throughout the construction period.

External Lighting

8. No external lighting shall be erected or installed until a scheme has been submitted in writing and approved by the County Planning Authority. The scheme shall include a layout plan that covers all new proposed external lighting and details the proposed beam orientation and schedule of equipment in the design, including luminaire type, mounting height, aiming angles and luminaire profiles. In addition a lighting contour map shall be submitted along with detail of the proposed operating hours for the lighting and how these would be controlled. The approved scheme shall be installed, maintained and operated in accordance with the approved details for the lifetime of the development.

Reason: In the interests of amenity, ecology, site security and sustainability in accordance with Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Materials

9. The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall be in accordance with those detailed in the application.

Reason: In the interest of the appearance of the school and the visual amenities of the area having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Cycle Spaces

10. Within three months of the occupation of the development hereby permitted a total of 40 cycle spaces (including a minimum of 18 covered spaces) shall be provided on the site as shown on Proposed Site Plan drawing no. SK06 revision D dated 9 August 2012.

Reason: To ensure that an appropriate number of cycle spaces are provided and to encourage the use of means of transport other than the private car in accordance with having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Cycle Spaces

11. The number of cycle spaces provided shall be reviewed annually alongside the school travel plan (condition 16) and additional covered spaces shall be provided if the results of the annual review demonstrate that there are insufficient numbers of cycle spaces to meet peak demand.

Reason: To encourage staff and students to cycle and ensure that an appropriate number of cycle spaces are provided in accordance with Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Car Park Management

Prior to the occupation of the development hereby permitted a scheme for managing the use of the back to back car parking spaces shall be submitted to the County Planning Authority for approval in writing. The approved scheme Statement shall be implemented thereafter.

Playing Field Restoration

12. Within six months of the occupation of the building hereby approved the areas of playing field disturbed during construction shall be reinstated to a standard at least the equivalent of the remainder of the school playing field.

Reason: To ensure the playing field is restored to a condition fit for purpose.

Removal of Mobile Classrooms

13. Within three months of the completion of the development hereby permitted the two mobile classrooms shown on the Existing Site Plan drawing no. S1 revision C dated 3 August 2012 shall be removed from the site.

Reason: To protect the amenities of neighbouring properties having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Contaminated Land

14. If, during development, ground contamination not previously identified is found to be present at the site then no further development shall be carried out until the developer has submitted, and obtained written approval from the County Planning Authority for a remediation strategy detailing how this contamination shall be dealt with.

Reason: To ensure that risks from land contamination are minimised and to ensure that the development can be carried out safely without unacceptable risks to human health and the environment having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Travel Plan

15. The submitted travel plan (reference 9282217) shall be implemented prior to occupation of any of the extensions hereby permitted and shall be subsequently reviewed on an annual basis and updated where appropriate with updates to be submitted to the County Planning Authority for approval in writing.

Reason: To reduce the number of car borne journeys related to the development and to encourage the use of means of transport other than the private car having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Highway Safety

16. All vehicles entering and leaving the site shall be cleansed of mud and other debris to ensure that there is no nuisance dust and no mud or debris deposited on the public highway.

Reason: To ensure satisfactory access and avoid any adverse impacts on the highway network and highway safety having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Complaints

17. In the event that complaints regarding dust, noise, lighting or other land use planning matters are received by the County Planning Authority from any sensitive receptor, and thereafter notified to the occupier, an assessment of the complaint shall be undertaken by the occupier. A report on the findings, with proposals for removing, reducing or mitigating identified adverse effects resulting from the operation, and a

programme for the implementation of remedial measures and works to be undertaken shall be submitted to the County Planning Authority no later than five working days from the receipt of the complaint, unless a later date is otherwise agreed in writing by the County Planning Authority. The approved proposals shall be implemented in accordance with the agreed programme and shall be maintained thereafter.

Reason: In the interests of amenity protection having regard to Policy 13 of the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (June 2008).

Informatives Tree Preservation Order 1. The applicant is advised that Wallis Spinney is protected by a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) and that these works will affect the TPO and therefore require consent from Kettering Borough Council. Building Regulations 2. The applicant is advised that the erection of new buildings or alterations to existing buildings should comply with the Building Regulations. This permission is not a consent under the Buildings Regulations for which a separate application should be made. Flood Risk Standing Advice 3. The applicant’s attention is drawn to the Environment Agency Flood Risk Standing Advice which can be viewed on the Environment Agency web site at www.environment-agency.gov.uk Crime Prevention 4. The applicant’s attention is drawn to the recommendations of the Crime Prevention Design Advisor in their correspondence dated 7 May 2013. In particular the CPDA recommends: The development complies with the requirements of Secured by Design for Schools 2010 (www.securedbydesign.com) in so far as is practical. All ground floor windows and others that are easily accessible meet BS7950 or equivalent with laminated glazing to 6.8 millimetres minimum thickness. All external doors to conform to PAS23/PAS247 or equivalent with access control to staff room and office areas. Access control to all external entrances used by the public with a double set of doors to the main entrance to provide an air lock operated from reception. Utilities 5. The applicant’s attention is drawn to the response from Western Power Distribution (WPD) dated 22 April 2013 which points out that there are two underground cables which supply the buildings. WPD note that there may be other private or WPD owned electricity cables on the site that are not shown on the plan. Breeding Birds 6. The applicant’s attention is drawn to the protection given to breeding birds under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. To avoid contravening the relevant provisions of the Act it would be advisable to avoid carrying out any work that might damage an

active nest during the bird breeding season (March to September inclusive) or to ensure that an appropriate inspection is undertaken by a competent person to ensure that no breeding birds will be adversely affected. Neighbour Notification 7. Prior to the commencement of any site works, all occupiers of potentially sensitive properties surrounding the site should be notified in writing of the nature and duration of works to be undertaken, and the name and address of a responsible person, to whom enquiries/complaints should be directed.