Reproductive Styles of Osteoglossomorpha with Emphasis on Notopterus Notopterus and Osteoglossum Bicirrhosum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reproductive Styles of Osteoglossomorpha with Emphasis on Notopterus Notopterus and Osteoglossum Bicirrhosum Reproductive styles of Osteoglossomorpha with emphasis on Notopterus notopterus and Osteoglossum bicirrhosum DISSERTATION Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor rerum agriculturarum (Dr. rer. agr) Eingereicht an der Landwirtschaftlich-Gärtnerischen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von Honesty Yanwirsal (M.Sc Fishery Science and Aquaculture) Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr. Jan-Hendrik Olbertz Dekan der Landwirtschaflich-Gärtnerischen Fakultät Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c. Frank Ellmer Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Frank Kirschbaum 2. Prof. Dr. Ralph Tiedemann 3. Dr. Peter Bartsch Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 16 Mai 2013 Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Frank Kirschbaum & Dr. Peter Bartsch Thousand words are never enough to express my gratitude. It’s been a long journey, a precious and unforgettable experience in my life. ii LIST OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... VI LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... IX SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... X ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ............................................................................................... XII 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 General overview on Osteoglossomorpha ........................................................... 1 1.2 Reproduction in Osteoglossomorpha .................................................................. 4 1.2.1 Influence of environmental factors on gonad development and spawning season ...................................................................................... 4 1.2.1.1 Family Osteoglossidae .............................................................. 4 1.2.1.2 Family Notopteridae ................................................................. 4 1.2.1.3 Family Mormyridae .................................................................. 5 1.2.1.4 Family Gymnarchidae ............................................................... 5 1.2.1.5 Family Pantodontidae ............................................................... 5 1.2.1.6 Family Hiodontidae .................................................................. 5 1.2.2 Breeding behaviour ................................................................................. 6 1.2.2.1 Family Osteoglossidae .............................................................. 6 1.2.2.2 Family Notopteridae ................................................................. 7 1.2.2.3 Family Mormyridae .................................................................. 7 1.2.2.4 Family Gymnarchidae ............................................................... 8 1.2.2.5 Family Pantodontidae ............................................................... 8 1.2.2.6 Family Hiodontidae .................................................................. 8 1.2.3 Early ontogeny and objectives of the study ............................................ 8 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................ 10 2.1 Mormyridae ....................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Petrocephalus soudanensis ................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Petrocephalus catostoma ...................................................................... 10 2.2 Pantodontidae .................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Pantodon buchholzi ............................................................................... 11 2.3 Notopteridae ...................................................................................................... 13 2.3.1 Notopterus notopterus ........................................................................... 13 2.3.1.1 Specimens and breeding tanks ................................................ 13 2.3.1.2 Rearing .................................................................................... 14 2.3.2 Xenomystus nigri ................................................................................... 15 2.3.2.1 Specimens and breeding tanks ................................................ 15 2.4 Osteoglossidae ................................................................................................... 16 2.4.1 Osteoglossum bicirrhosum .................................................................... 16 2.4.1.1 Location and fishes ................................................................. 16 2.4.1.2 Collection of samples .............................................................. 16 iii 2.4.1.3 Rearing and documentation .................................................... 18 2.5 Variation and measurement of environmental parameters ................................ 19 2.6 Behaviours ......................................................................................................... 19 2.7 Maturity coefficient (MC) ................................................................................. 19 2.8 Hormonal treatment ........................................................................................... 20 2.9 General photography ......................................................................................... 20 2.10 Terminology ...................................................................................................... 20 3 RESULTS ................................................................................................................... 21 3.1 Family Mormyridae ........................................................................................... 21 3.1.1 Petrocephalus soudanensis ................................................................... 21 3.1.2 Petrocephalus catostoma ...................................................................... 23 3.2 Family Pantodontidae, Pantodon buchholzi ...................................................... 26 3.3 Family Notopteridae .......................................................................................... 30 3.3.1 Xenomystus nigri ................................................................................... 30 3.3.2 Notopterus notopterus ........................................................................... 33 3.3.2.1 Reproduction ........................................................................... 33 3.3.2.2 In situ condition of mature and immature (F1) specimens ................................................................................ 39 3.3.2.3 External features of the egg .................................................... 40 3.3.2.4 Development ........................................................................... 41 3.3.2.4.1 The embryonic period ....................................................... 41 3.3.2.4.1.1 The cleavage phase ....................................................... 41 3.3.2.4.1.2 The embryonic phase ................................................... 43 3.3.2.4.1.3 The eleutheroembryonic phase ..................................... 49 3.3.2.4.2 The larval period ............................................................... 52 3.3.2.4.3 The juvenile period ........................................................... 54 3.3.2.4.4 The adult period ................................................................ 57 3.4 Osteoglossidae ................................................................................................... 61 3.4.1 Osteoglossum bicirrhosum .................................................................... 61 3.4.1.1 External morphology and in situ condition of dissected gonads...................................................................... 61 3.4.1.2 Gonad of Silver Arowana and Blue Arowana ........................ 63 3.4.1.3 Egg of Silver Arowana............................................................ 64 3.4.1.4 Development ........................................................................... 65 3.4.1.4.1 The embryonic period ....................................................... 65 3.4.1.4.1.1 The embryonic phase ................................................... 65 3.4.1.4.1.2 The eleutheroembryonic phase ..................................... 71 3.4.1.4.2 The juvenile period ........................................................... 76 4 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................. 81 4.1 Overview of environmental triggers of gonad development ............................. 81 4.1.1 Family Mormyridae .............................................................................. 81 iv 4.1.2 Family Notopteridae ............................................................................. 81 4.1.3 Family Pantodontidae ........................................................................... 82 4.1.4 Family Osteoglossidae .......................................................................... 83 4.2 Modes of reproduction in Notopterus notopterus and Osteoglossum bicirrhosum with comparison to other osteoglossomorphs ............................................................................................ 83 4.2.1 Reproductive guilds .............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • 13914444D46c0aa91d02e31218
    2 Breeding of wild and some domestic animals at regional zoological institutions in 2013 3 РЫБЫ P I S C E S ВОББЕЛОНГООБРАЗНЫЕ ORECTOLOBIFORMES Сем. Азиатские кошачьи акулы (Бамбуковые акулы) – Hemiscyllidae Коричневополосая бамбуковая акула – Chiloscyllium punctatum Brownbanded bambooshark IUCN (NT) Sevastopol 20 ХВОСТОКОЛООБРАЗНЫЕ DASYATIFORMES Сем. Речные хвостоколы – Potamotrygonidae Глазчатый хвостокол (Моторо) – Potamotrygon motoro IUCN (DD) Ocellate river stingray Sevastopol - ? КАРПООБРАЗНЫЕ CYPRINIFORMES Сем. Цитариновые – Citharinidae Серебристый дистиход – Distichodusaffinis (noboli) Silver distichodus Novosibirsk 40 Сем. Пираньевые – Serrasalmidae Серебристый метиннис – Metynnis argenteus Silver dollar Yaroslavl 10 Обыкновенный метиннис – Metynnis schreitmuelleri (hypsauchen) Plainsilver dollar Nikolaev 4; Novosibirsk 100; Kharkov 20 Пятнистый метиннис – Metynnis maculatus Spotted metynnis Novosibirsk 50 Пиранья Наттерера – Serrasalmus nattereri Red piranha Novosibirsk 80; Kharkov 30 4 Сем. Харацидовые – Characidae Красноплавничный афиохаракс – Aphyocharax anisitsi (rubripinnis) Bloodfin tetra Киев 5; Perm 10 Парагвайский афиохаракс – Aphyocharax paraquayensis Whitespot tetra Perm 11 Рубиновый афиохаракс Рэтбина – Aphyocharax rathbuni Redflank bloodfin Perm 10 Эквадорская тетра – Astyanax sp. Tetra Perm 17 Слепая рыбка – Astyanax fasciatus mexicanus (Anoptichthys jordani) Mexican tetra Kharkov 10 Рублик-монетка – Ctenobrycon spilurus (+ С. spilurusvar. albino) Silver tetra Kharkov 20 Тернеция (Траурная тетра) – Gymnocorymbus
    [Show full text]
  • Variations Spatio-Temporelles De La Structure Taxonomique Et La Compétition Alimentaire Des Poissons Du Lac Tonlé Sap, Cambodge Heng Kong
    Variations spatio-temporelles de la structure taxonomique et la compétition alimentaire des poissons du lac Tonlé Sap, Cambodge Heng Kong To cite this version: Heng Kong. Variations spatio-temporelles de la structure taxonomique et la compétition alimentaire des poissons du lac Tonlé Sap, Cambodge. Ecologie, Environnement. Université Paul Sabatier - Toulouse III, 2018. Français. NNT : 2018TOU30122. tel-02277574 HAL Id: tel-02277574 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02277574 Submitted on 3 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE En vue de l’obtention du DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITE DE TOULOUSE Délivré par : Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier (UT3 Paul Sabatier) Présentée et soutenue par : Heng KONG Le 03 Juilet 2018 Titre : Variations spatio-temporelles de la structure taxonomique et la compétition alimentaire des poissons du lac Tonlé Sap, Cambodge Ecole doctorale et discipline ou spécialité : ED SDU2E : Ecologie fonctionnelle Unité de recherche : Laboratoire Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Environnement (EcoLab) UMR 5245, CNRS –
    [Show full text]
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi
    Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 (http://www.accessscience.com/) Article by: Boschung, Herbert Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Gardiner, Brian Linnean Society of London, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London, United Kingdom. Publication year: 2014 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400) Content Morphology Euteleostei Bibliography Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi The most recent group of actinopterygians (rayfin fishes), first appearing in the Upper Triassic (Fig. 1). About 26,840 species are contained within the Teleostei, accounting for more than half of all living vertebrates and over 96% of all living fishes. Teleosts comprise 517 families, of which 69 are extinct, leaving 448 extant families; of these, about 43% have no fossil record. See also: Actinopterygii (/content/actinopterygii/009100); Osteichthyes (/content/osteichthyes/478500) Fig. 1 Cladogram showing the relationships of the extant teleosts with the other extant actinopterygians. (J. S. Nelson, Fishes of the World, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 2006) 1 of 9 10/7/2015 1:07 PM Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 Morphology Much of the evidence for teleost monophyly (evolving from a common ancestral form) and relationships comes from the caudal skeleton and concomitant acquisition of a homocercal tail (upper and lower lobes of the caudal fin are symmetrical). This type of tail primitively results from an ontogenetic fusion of centra (bodies of vertebrae) and the possession of paired bracing bones located bilaterally along the dorsal region of the caudal skeleton, derived ontogenetically from the neural arches (uroneurals) of the ural (tail) centra.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Fish Report
    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodian Journal of Natural History
    Cambodian Journal of Natural History Artisanal Fisheries Tiger Beetles & Herpetofauna Coral Reefs & Seagrass Meadows June 2019 Vol. 2019 No. 1 Cambodian Journal of Natural History Editors Email: [email protected], [email protected] • Dr Neil M. Furey, Chief Editor, Fauna & Flora International, Cambodia. • Dr Jenny C. Daltry, Senior Conservation Biologist, Fauna & Flora International, UK. • Dr Nicholas J. Souter, Mekong Case Study Manager, Conservation International, Cambodia. • Dr Ith Saveng, Project Manager, University Capacity Building Project, Fauna & Flora International, Cambodia. International Editorial Board • Dr Alison Behie, Australia National University, • Dr Keo Omaliss, Forestry Administration, Cambodia. Australia. • Ms Meas Seanghun, Royal University of Phnom Penh, • Dr Stephen J. Browne, Fauna & Flora International, Cambodia. UK. • Dr Ou Chouly, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State • Dr Chet Chealy, Royal University of Phnom Penh, University, USA. Cambodia. • Dr Nophea Sasaki, Asian Institute of Technology, • Mr Chhin Sophea, Ministry of Environment, Cambodia. Thailand. • Dr Martin Fisher, Editor of Oryx – The International • Dr Sok Serey, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Journal of Conservation, UK. Cambodia. • Dr Thomas N.E. Gray, Wildlife Alliance, Cambodia. • Dr Bryan L. Stuart, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, USA. • Mr Khou Eang Hourt, National Authority for Preah Vihear, Cambodia. • Dr Sor Ratha, Ghent University, Belgium. Cover image: Chinese water dragon Physignathus cocincinus (© Jeremy Holden). The occurrence of this species and other herpetofauna in Phnom Kulen National Park is described in this issue by Geissler et al. (pages 40–63). News 1 News Save Cambodia’s Wildlife launches new project to New Master of Science in protect forest and biodiversity Sustainable Agriculture in Cambodia Agriculture forms the backbone of the Cambodian Between January 2019 and December 2022, Save Cambo- economy and is a priority sector in government policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Spermiogenesis in Mimagoniates Barberi (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characidae), an Oviparous, Internally Fertilizing Fish Anna Pecio and Jan Rafinâski
    Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 80: 35±45 (January 1999) Spermiogenesis in Mimagoniates barberi (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characidae), an oviparous, internally fertilizing fish Anna Pecio and Jan RafinÂski Abstract Institute of Zoology Pecio, A. and Rafin ski, J. 1999. Spermiogenesis in Mimagoniates barberi Department of Comparative Anatomy (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characidae), an oviparous, internally fertilizing fish. Jagiellonian University Ð Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 80: 35±45 Ingardena 6 PL 30060 KrakoÂw The ultrastructure of spermiogenesis of Mimagoniates barberi (Characidae), Poland an internally fertilizing oviparous species is described. Spermiogenesis involves conspicuous changes of the topography of the cellular constituents Keywords: and modifications of their shape. The round nucleus elongates to become a spermiogenesis, ultrastructure, fish, very long flat plate. The long axis of the nucleus establishes the polarity of Mimagoniates, Glandulocaudinae, internal fertilization the spermatid and spermatozoon. The nucleus does not rotate and, as a consequence, the centrioles are located at the proximal tip of the spermato- Accepted for publication: zoon and the flagellum runs parallel to the long axis of the nucleus. Mito- 21 July 1998 chondria and most of the cytoplasm are shifted to the pole opposite the centrioles. The proximal portion of the flagellum is located in a long cytoplasmic canal which shortens during spermiogenesis and is free for most of its length in the mature spermatozoon flagellum. In the cytoplasm of elongated spermatids, close to the nuclear membrane, numerous micro- tubules appear which run from the centriolar pole to the mitochondrial pole forming a microtubular manchette. The microtubules persist in mature spermatozoa. It is concluded that the highly specialized structure of the spermatozoon of M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Systematic Biology of Fossil and Living Bony-Tongue Fishes, Osteoglossomorpha (Actinopterygii: Teleostei)
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 16(3): e180031, 2018 Journal homepage: www.scielo.br/ni DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20180031 Published online: 11 October 2018 (ISSN 1982-0224) Copyright © 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Printed: 30 September 2018 (ISSN 1679-6225) Review article A review of the systematic biology of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes, Osteoglossomorpha (Actinopterygii: Teleostei) Eric J. Hilton1 and Sébastien Lavoué2,3 The bony-tongue fishes, Osteoglossomorpha, have been the focus of a great deal of morphological, systematic, and evolutio- nary study, due in part to their basal position among extant teleostean fishes. This group includes the mooneyes (Hiodontidae), knifefishes (Notopteridae), the abu (Gymnarchidae), elephantfishes (Mormyridae), arawanas and pirarucu (Osteoglossidae), and the African butterfly fish (Pantodontidae). This morphologically heterogeneous group also has a long and diverse fossil record, including taxa from all continents and both freshwater and marine deposits. The phylogenetic relationships among most extant osteoglossomorph families are widely agreed upon. However, there is still much to discover about the systematic biology of these fishes, particularly with regard to the phylogenetic affinities of several fossil taxa, within Mormyridae, and the position of Pantodon. In this paper we review the state of knowledge for osteoglossomorph fishes. We first provide an overview of the diversity of Osteoglossomorpha, and then discuss studies of the phylogeny of Osteoglossomorpha from both morphological and molecular perspectives, as well as biogeographic analyses of the group. Finally, we offer our perspectives on future needs for research on the systematic biology of Osteoglossomorpha. Keywords: Biogeography, Osteoglossidae, Paleontology, Phylogeny, Taxonomy. Os peixes da Superordem Osteoglossomorpha têm sido foco de inúmeros estudos sobre a morfologia, sistemática e evo- lução, particularmente devido à sua posição basal dentre os peixes teleósteos.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Regional Information Base for Lake Tanganyika Research
    RESEARCH FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE FISHERIES ON LAKE GCP/RAF/271/FIN-TD/Ol(En) TANGANYIKA GCP/RAF/271/FIN-TD/01 (En) January 1992 TOWARDS A REGIONAL INFORMATION BASE FOR LAKE TANGANYIKA RESEARCH by J. Eric Reynolds FINNISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Bujumbura, January 1992 The conclusions and recommendations given in this and other reports in the Research for the Management of the Fisheries on Lake Tanganyika Project series are those considered appropriate at the time of preparation. They may be modified in the light of further knowledge gained at subsequent stages of the Project. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of FAO or FINNIDA concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or concerning the determination of its frontiers or boundaries. PREFACE The Research for the Management of the Fisheries on Lake Tanganyika project (Tanganyika Research) became fully operational in January 1992. It is executed by the Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO) and funded by the Finnish International Development Agency (FINNIDA). This project aims at the determination of the biological basis for fish production on Lake Tanganyika, in order to permit the formulation of a coherent lake-wide fisheries management policy for the four riparian States (Burundi, Tanzania, Zaïre and Zambia). Particular attention will be also given to the reinforcement of the skills and physical facilities of the fisheries research units in all four beneficiary countries as well as to the buildup of effective coordination mechanisms to ensure full collaboration between the Governments concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Nitric Oxide Synthase Family in Vertebrates and Novel
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.14.448362; this version posted June 14, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Evolution of the nitric oxide synthase family in vertebrates 2 and novel insights in gill development 3 4 Giovanni Annona1, Iori Sato2, Juan Pascual-Anaya3,†, Ingo Braasch4, Randal Voss5, 5 Jan Stundl6,7,8, Vladimir Soukup6, Shigeru Kuratani2,3, 6 John H. Postlethwait9, Salvatore D’Aniello1,* 7 8 1 Biology and Evolution of Marine Organisms, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, 80121, 9 Napoli, Italy 10 2 Laboratory for Evolutionary Morphology, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics 11 Research (BDR), Kobe, 650-0047, Japan 12 3 Evolutionary Morphology Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Pioneering Research (CPR), 2-2- 13 3 Minatojima-minami, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan 14 4 Department of Integrative Biology and Program in Ecology, Evolution & Behavior (EEB), 15 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA 16 5 Department of Neuroscience, Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, and 17 Ambystoma Genetic Stock Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA 18 6 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech 19 Republic 20 7 Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 21 Pasadena, CA, USA 22 8 South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, 23 Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in Ceske 24 Budejovice, Vodnany, Czech Republic 25 9 Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA 26 † Present address: Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of 27 Málaga; and Andalusian Centre for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology (BIONAND), 28 Málaga, Spain 29 30 * Correspondence: [email protected] 31 32 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.14.448362; this version posted June 14, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Fish Use Species-Specific Discharge for Mate Recognition
    Biol. Lett. (2009) 5, 225–228 the Congo River. Using their electric organ discharge doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0566 (EOD), mormyrid fishes sense objects by active electro- Published online 25 November 2008 location (Lissmann & Machin 1958; von der Emde Evolutionary biology 1999). Beside this, the EOD signal plays an essential role in social communication (for reviews, see Moller 1995; Bullock et al. 2005; Ladich et al. 2006). Based on Electrifying love: electric multilocus genetic analyses, we have demonstrated that EOD types are indicative for evolutionary divergence fish use species-specific between Campylomormyrus species of the lower Congo (Feulner et al. 2006). The high diversity of sympatrically discharge for occurring species is reflected in the vast variety of EOD mate recognition signals in this genus. We hypothesized that the EOD is used in mate Philine G. D. Feulner1,2,*, Martin Plath1,3, recognition and that female preference for EOD Jacob Engelmann4, Frank Kirschbaum5,6 signals of conspecific males facilitates assortative and Ralph Tiedemann1 mating, thereby ultimately providing a prezygotic isolation mechanism. This study focused on Campylo- 1Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany mormyrus compressirostris and related species. We pre- 2Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, dicted a preference of female C. compressirostris for Sheffield S10 2TN, UK conspecific males and their EODs over closely related, 3Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA sympatric Campylomormyrus rhynchophorus males, 4Institute of Zoology, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany which exhibit a much longer EOD (figure 1a,b), but 5Institute of Animal Sciences, Humboldt-University Berlin, no discrimination between conspecifics and the 10115 Berlin, Germany distantly related Campylomormyrus tamandua, whose 6Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 12587 Berlin, Germany EOD is more similar to conspecific males.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals
    Jelle Atema Richard R. Fay Arthur N. Popper William N. Tavolga Editors Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals Springer-Verlag New York Berlin Heidelberg London Paris Tokyo JELLE ATEMA, Boston University Marine Program, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA Richard R. Fay, Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois 60626, USA ARTHUR N. POPPER, Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA WILLIAM N. TAVOLGA, Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida 33577, USA The cover Illustration is a reproduction of Figure 13.3, p. 343 of this volume Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Papers based on presentations given at an International Conference on the Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals held, June 24-28, 1985, at the Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota, Fla. Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. 1. Aquatic animals—Physiology—Congresses. 2. Senses and Sensation—Congresses. I. Atema, Jelle. II. International Conference on the Sensory Biology - . of Aquatic Animals (1985 : Sarasota, Fla.) QL120.S46 1987 591.92 87-9632 © 1988 by Springer-Verlag New York Inc. x —• All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer-Verlag, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York 10010, U.S.A.), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of Information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, Computer Software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc.
    [Show full text]