Jacob, Leah and Rachel: a Love Triangle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jacob, Leah and Rachel: a Love Triangle JACOB, LEAH AND RACHEL: A LOVE TRIANGLE Genesis 29:1-14 Return to Famous Couples Index Page Before reading the Passage. • The last time we say Jacob he was running for his life...fleeing from the wrath and vengeance of his brother, Esau. • At the request of Rebekah, Isaac told Jacob to leave Beersheba and flee to Haran. He was to go to Rebekah's brother's house and take a wife from one of Laban's daughters. • You will remember that Rebekah's involved her son in deceiving her own husband, Isaac. • Treachery and deceit seemed to run in the family, because Laban was one of the biggest con-men you could ever meet. • Brother and sister were cons, but Rebekah also taught her son Jacob the fine art of deception. • Most children carry with them through life the impact and impressions of character of their parents. • We are going to see that Laban's two daughters, Leah and Rachel, ended up deceiving their father also...They learned it from him. • What a legacy to leave for your children! • On his way from Beersheba to Haran, Jacob stopped to spend the night out under the stars in a certain place. He found a stone for a pillow, went to sleep and began to dream of a ladder that reached from earth to heaven and at the top of the ladder stood the Lord God. God wanted Jacob to know that He was going to be with him. • See Genesis 28:10-13, 15-19a. • Now Jacob had made the 500-mile trip and makes his way to Haran—to a well, most likely the very same well where Rebekah had watered the camels of Abraham's servant and then went back with him to become Isaac's bride. Read the Passage. Note Genesis 29:5: “Do you know Laban?” “We know him.” There was a wealth of hidden meaning behind that response. Everybody for miles around knew Laban. Jacob was about to know him too—and it was going to cost him! Notice 29:10: Jacob saw Rachel, but he also saw Laban's sheep. You get the idea in 29:7-8 that Jacob was kind of showing off in front of Rachel...And he wanted to be alone with her—that's why he told the other shepherds...”Water your sheep and get out of here.” • Jacob may have been a “homebody” but he wasn't bashful—verse 11 18 • Verse 14—He had been there a month when he told Laban he wanted to marry his youngest daughter, Rachel. I. Love at First Sight Genesis 29:15-20 • Genesis 29:20 is one of the most beautiful sentences, not just in the Bible but in all of literature. • Notice 29:17 - Rachel was beautiful in face and figure! It was love at first sight. - Jacob voluntarily offered to work for Laban for seven years—hard labor and the wages would be used as a dowry for Rachel's hand in marriage. - Seven years hard labor—what a compliment to Rachel, but what a proof that Jacob truly loved her. - Remember: Jacob had only known Rachel for a month; and wanted to marry her. - You may have noticed in the paper last month an old black man who had been married to his wife for over 50 years. He was the son of a preacher and he told his wife-to-be on the first date that he wanted to marry her. She asked him how he could be so sure she was the right girl for him. He said, “The Lord is my Shepherd, I see what I want!” Well, Jacob saw what he wanted. • Seven years! Think of all the things that have happened to you over the past seven years...All the changes in your life...in your family...in your body...in your heart...But think also, it would give them both time to really get to know each other. • Love makes time pass quickly...Verse 20. It seemed like only a few days to Jacob! • Don't leave this section without noticing 29:17 “Leah was tender eyed.” or “weak eyed.” That doesn't mean she couldn't see well, but it means there was no sparkle in her eye—no brilliance—no luster. • She may have had a good figure—I think she did, for we will see later that she must have been built much like Rachel...she had a good figure, but not a pretty face. • She was rather plain looking...rather homey looking. She looked as through she had been whipped by an ugly stick. • Look at 29:21. Jacob had to go to Laban and demand his wife be given to him. Laban should have taker the initiative at the end of the seven years and given her to Jacob. • This is the first hint that Laban is a con man. II. Love Under Great Struggle Genesis 29:21-30 • Men, put yourself in Jacob's place! How would you feel if you got married and the next day realized that you had married the wrong woman? • Did you know that same thing happens all the time—every day? Men marry the wrong women and women marry the wrong men every day. Some do it two or three times.! • How did Laban succeed in switching the girls without Jacob knowing it? - He must have had Rachel gagged and hog-tied somewhere. - But Leah was a willing participant. All evidence points to Leah being in love with Jacob 19 from the beginning. After they were married, despite the fact that Jacob kept making it clear that he loved Rachel, Leah kept trying to win his love. Two things helped in the deception: 1. The Veil - The custom was to wear a heavy veil and, remember, it was at night. - And, remember, I told you that she was similar in statue and figure. 2. The Vial - The word “feast” carries the idea of much drinking. Drinking was a big part of weddings in that day. - The word “bridal” comes from two words--”bride” and “ale”. - I never have understood why a bride and groom wants to get drunk on their wedding night. Next to receiving Jesus as our personal Savior, your wedding day ought to be the most sacred day of your life. Looks like the couple would at least want to know what was going on! Jacob was in a half-drunken stupor and their marriage was consummated. But the next morning Jacob was shocked into soberness when he realized he was lying beside the wrong woman! • Why didn't Jacob knock Laban down with his shepherd's rod, grab up Rachel, put her on a camel and flee? • Because he felt he was being punished for his own deception—of his own father and brother. • Sometimes sin is not only punished, it is punished in kind. - Jacob deceived his father; he was in turn deceived by a father—his father-in-law. - Jacob's deception of his father involved the elder son; the eldest daughter was involved in Jacob being deceived. - Jacob worked together with one parent and deceive another; Leah also worked together with one of her parents to deceive Jacob. If Leah had been the woman she should have been, she would have informed Jacob as soon as the two of them were together alone in the tent. But she obviously enjoyed the experience. • She also treated her sister with immoral disdain. She may have been jealous of Rachel's beauty and Jacob's great love for Rachel. • For the younger sister, Rachel, to get a man before the older sister would have been hard to take. I said a moment ago that every day folks marry the wrong person. A study shows that before the first year is ended in marriage, almost 50% think they may have married the wrong person. Why? 1. Many Marriages have the Wrong Beginning—for they are based on deception. - The only reason Jacob married Leah was because he had been trapped by a carefully devised scheme by her and her father. - The marriage began with dishonesty and deception. - Many marriages are based on a shaky foundation. 2. Some have a Distorted View of Marriage. - We tend to idealize marriage. Many believe the wedding ceremony is a gateway to uninterrupted bliss where we will live happily ever after. Then when our marriages fail to 20 meet our ideal, when conflict begins, we conclude that we must have married the wrong person. We think that if we had married the right person, we wouldn't be having these problems. 3. Some have a Distorted Perspective. - Grass is greener on the other side. It seems like other marriages are happier than ours. - Another's marriage may not really be better, but the perspective from which we view it is. The irony is that many times the couples we envy look at our marriage with the same kind of envy. 4. Some have a Distorted Evaluation of Themselves. - Sometimes we just think we deserve better that the person we're married to. - One husband told his wife, “There are better fish in the sea.” She said, “Yes, and there's a lot better bait, too!” - None of us are as wonderful as we think we are. Notice Genesis 29:26-30 • Laban's defense for tricking Jacob was, “Well, it is the custom of our people that the older daughter marry first. You should have known that, Jacob.” • But decency, integrity and morality all have a higher priority than custom.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Unattractive Leah Genesis 29: 16-35 I Was Having Originally Some
    Unattractive Leah Genesis 29: 16-35 I was having originally some difficulty coming up with a title for my sermon. I titled the first draft ‘Ugly Leah,’ but, I decided against it. To me and to many, ‘ugly’ is simply an ugly word. And we are not sure about Leah’s appearance. She is called ‘weak eyed in scripture. We only know she was contrasted to her beautiful sister Rachel. The Hebrew word translated ‘weak-eyed’ ‘rak,’ means ‘weak’ or ‘dull.’ So a girl who is called ‘dull- eyed’ is probably not accepting that as much of a complement. As I was contemplating my title, I did think of the television show that just got cancelled called “Ugly Betty.” The plot consists of the main character, Betty Suarez, a very plain girl lacking fashion sense who is thrust into a different world when she lands a position with a major, trendy high fashion magazine. Some of her co-workers endeavor to constantly humiliate her because of her lackluster appearance. However, through persistence, and a loyal spirit, she gains friends in the company and is a key instrument in moving the magazine and certain co-workers forward. Even the Leah’s and the Betty’s of the world can make a big difference. But in the end I settled on my present title, because obviously Leah did not measure up to the external attributes of sister Rachael. But as we will see, despite setbacks and unfulfilled hopes, she kept her faith in God. Leah serves as an example of one who remains faithful even when the chips are down.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tribe of Asher by Marc Chagall from the President the Chosen a Star Appeared Suddenly in the Eastern Sky
    The Tribe of Asher By Marc Chagall From the President The Chosen A star appeared suddenly in the eastern sky. People Astrologers, philosophers, teachers, politicians, all wondered about THE CHOSEN PEOPLE is published monthly the strange star. What did it mean? What did it signify? They had many (except August) as a medium of information 4 concerning the Jewish people Israel and questions, but no answers—so they did nothing. the work of the American Board of Missions to the Jews Inc, 100 Hunt Road Orangeburg The common people, the masses, saw the same star. They waited for New York 10962. an appropriate response from their leaders, but—in the end—they too did President nothing. Harold A. Sevener Three other men also saw that same star. They had the same questions. Administrative Vice-President Roy Adams But with one major difference. They had heard about the prophecies that Editor & Creative Director foretold the birth of a Messiah—the Son of God. Jonathan Singer When they saw the wondrous star, they followed it, traveling Staff Writer hundreds of miles. They were wise men—they acted upon the knowledge Amy Rabinovitz Missionary Director they had about God. John Bell Sometimes I wonder why there were only three men who came. Regional Directors Where were all the others? Did only three men out of all the hundreds of Northeast: New York City, N.Y. thousands of people living in the East understand the "signs of the times"? Sam Nadler 212-757-6716 Did only three understand the prophetic Word? Southeast Reston, Va.
    [Show full text]
  • Live, Laugh, Limerence
    Live, Laugh, Limerence An Opera Buffa in four acts Libretto by Marijke De Roover 2019 De Roover’s introductory notes: The performance needs the ​ naturalism of the text. All characters exist all at once all as one. The landscape in which the experience is set could be a metropolitan studio apartment, an AA meeting, a deep dream or a dead star (more chance of it being a karaoke booth tbh). The I in the text is collective, the time suggestive. The simultaneity of the four parts of the text can be portrayed any which way. Me to me: You have a responsibility towards your audience. ​ Please keep all the ducks in a row! The ducks: 1 CAST OF CHARACTERS When reading this story out loud, please use the following voices: ELETTRA: fast-paced, sweet, melodic. LOTTE (V.O.): distant but sensitive, straight forward. TURANDOT (V.O.): wild but judgemental (but their friendship is like this). → darlin’, this kind of love is not viable (I can just see it with this fat american country accent lol) Or (Marilyn is so sweet and Jane is much more rough/tough) NARRATOR (V.O.): voice of god (distant), ironic, calm ​. 2 SCENES PROLOGUE: IN WHICH THE NARRATOR EXPRESSES HER DOUBTS ACT ONE: THE DAY I STOPPED DRINKING I BECAME A PLAYWRIGHT THAT JUST SITS IN COFFEE BARS Which introduces us to the tragedy and its Scene 1:​ ​ protagonist A brief encounter Scene 2:​ ​ I took a deep breath and listened to the old bray Scene 3:​ ​ of my heart. I am. I am. I am A realistic portrayal of someone using love as an Scene 4:​ ​ escapist drug ACT TWO: A KISS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meaning of Romantic Love in Contemporary Society
    Linfield University DigitalCommons@Linfield Senior Theses Student Scholarship & Creative Works 5-28-2020 The Evolution of Love: The Meaning of Romantic Love in Contemporary Society Jessica Salas Linfield College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/soanstud_theses Part of the Gender and Sexuality Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, and the Sociology of Culture Commons Recommended Citation Salas, Jessica, "The Evolution of Love: The Meaning of Romantic Love in Contemporary Society" (2020). Senior Theses. 13. https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/soanstud_theses/13 This Thesis (Open Access) is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It is brought to you for free via open access, courtesy of DigitalCommons@Linfield, with permission from the rights-holder(s). Your use of this Thesis (Open Access) must comply with the Terms of Use for material posted in DigitalCommons@Linfield, or with other stated terms (such as a Creative Commons license) indicated in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, or if you have questions about permitted uses, please contact [email protected]. Running head: ROMANTIC ATTITUDES AT THE INTERSECTION OF GENDER, RACE, AND SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS SALAS 1 The Evolution of Love: The Meaning of Romantic Love in Contemporary Society Jessica Salas Linfield College Department of Sociology and Anthropology 28 May 2020 THESIS COPYRIGHT PERMISSIONS Please read this document carefully before signing. If you have questions about any of these permissions, please contact the DigitalCommons Coordinator. Title of the Thesis: _____________________________________________________________ Author’s Name: (Last name, first name) _____________________________________________________________ Advisor’s Name _____________________________________________________________ DigitalCommons@Linfield (DC@L) is our web-based, open access-compliant institutional repository for digital content produced by Linfield faculty, students, staff, and their collaborators.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah Stories the Mamas and the Papas Torah Family Tree
    Bet (2nd Grade) Torah Stories The Mamas and the Papas Torah Family Tree Activity #1: To review from last year, read the 3 attached Bible stories about the mamas (matriarchs) and papas (patriarchs) of the Jewish people and/or read the character descriptions below. Using the Matriarch & Patriarch Family Tree Pictures page, cut out one set of character pictures and glue or tape them on the family tree in the correct place. Abraham- Known as the “father” of the Jewish people, Abraham is thought to be the first person to believe in ONE God. Abraham and his wife Sarah left their home to come to the land of Canaan to build a home for his children, grandchildren and future family members. Sarah- As the wife of Abraham, she left her home to help make a home for the Jewish people. Sarah gave birth to Isaac when she was old. Isaac- As son of Abraham and Sarah, Isaac led the Jewish people, after Abraham. Isaac and his wife Rebecca had twin sons, Jacob and Esau. Rebecca- Rebecca showed kindness by helping Isaac’s servant. She had twin sons, Jacob and Esau. Esau was strong and enjoyed hunting. Jacob stayed indoors helping with house chores. Rebecca thought Jacob should be the next leader of the Jewish people, even though it was Esau’s right as the older son. Rebecca helped Jacob trick Isaac. Isaac blessed Jacob instead of Esau and Jacob became the next leader. Jacob- Jacob was the clever, younger son of Isaac and Rebecca. With the help of his mother, Jacob became the next leader of the Jewish people.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis: the Struggles of Jacob
    • The Christian life concerns an upside-down Kingdom mentality Genesis: The Struggles of Jacob Route 66: Survey thru the Bible | March 3, 2019 o God desires to destroy “our kingdom” in order to build His own within us Scripture: Genesis 25-32 & through us, so that in all things His Kingdom reigns. A Common Struggle o Genesis 32:22-31 – Jacob is alone on the edge of the Jabbok River, which means “to empty itself.” The Struggle Begins: § Philippians 3:8-10 • Jacob & Esau o Rebekah is barren for _____ • The Man wrestling with Jacob is the Son of God (Christophany) o Rebekah becomes pregnant with _____________ o God wrestles with us in order to bless us and empower us and lead us § Two nations who will be divided into a greater depth of knowing Him and abiding in Him than we’re § The younger will rule over the older currently experiencing. o Esau – ___________ o He means to do a greater work in us, which takes time and persistence o Jacob – ___________ and a faith that says, “I will not let You go!” The Struggle Worsens: • Jacob & Laban o Unable to overpower Him, the best we can do is surrender completely before Him – holding onto Him & refusing to let go. o The deception in marriage of Leah & Rachel o The deception in years of service (___ total) § 2 Corinthians 12:8-10 – God may give us a limp, as He did to o Leaves Haran with Leah (Zilpah), Rachel (Bilhah), 11 kids, great wealth Jacob, but He uses our limp to make His power perfect within and possessions us.
    [Show full text]
  • Women of the Old Testament Leah and Rachel
    2 012/2013 WOMEN ’ S BIBLE STUDY WOMEN OF THE OLD TESTAMENT LEAH AND RACHEL Pray and ask God to help you to know Him better as you study His Word. Read the Bible passage (preferably without using commentaries). Begin to answer the questions using your own words. Questions are based on the New International Version (NIV) 2011 edition. Lesson 5 • October 17, 2012 1. What truth, verse or insight from last week’s study of Rebekah has been helpful to you? SECTION I: Read Genesis 29 2. a) Jacob is running from Esau’s murder threat. SummariZe Isaac’s blessing to him in 28:1-5 and God’s promise to him in 28:12-15. b) With these events in mind, what do you think accounts for all of the emotion Jacob displays in 29:11? 3. From V4-17, what facts do you learn about Leah and Rachel? Leah Rachel 4. a) Describe what happens in V18-25. b) Where had Jacob experienced this kind of identity deception before? 5. Then what happens in V26-30, and how is this a set-up for disaster? 6. List Leah’s sons in V31-35: Name Why Leah Gave That Name Lesson 5 Leah and Rachel \ Page 1 2 012/2013 WOMEN ’ S BIBLE STUDY 7. What are the “glass half empty” and the “glass half full” perspectives: a) in Leah’s story? _________________________________________________________________________________________________ b) in Rachel’s story? ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 8. Which of these two women can you relate to most and why? SECTION II: Read Genesis 30:1-26 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Love at First Sight
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Frontiers - Publisher Connector OPINION published: 28 July 2016 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01113 Love at First Sight James A. Grant-Jacob * Faculty of Physical Sciences and Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Keywords: interpersonal attraction, love, emotion, interpersonal relationships, perception Evolved traits such as intuitive skills have allowed individuals to quickly evaluate a suitable sexual partner in about 100 ms (Olson and Marshuetz, 2005; Willis and Todorov, 2006; Todorov, 2008). Having determined that someone is attractive at first sight, an individual may become emotionally attached to that person and communicate their affection via a copulatory gaze, in which the individual gazes into the other person’s eyes for many seconds (Fisher, 1992). In this opinion piece, I discuss why an individual can become attracted to and emotionally attached to another person in an instant at first sight and I propose how such feelings may be requited and thus how love at first sight between two people can occur if the receiver of such attraction has similar attributes to the individual. A person’s perceived attractiveness can vary depending on the individual who is perceiving their attractiveness. Studies on attraction have shown that people are strongly sexually attracted to lookalikes in physical appearance (Folkes, 1982; Alvarez and Bolívar, 2004; Malin, 2004), with researchers having found that subjects rated pictures of faces morphed with their own face as being more attractive (Penton-Voak et al., 1999). In work by Zaidel et al. (2003), subjects found that those faces that were more attractive, were also more trustworthy.
    [Show full text]
  • Love at First Sight
    Love at First Sight Science is exploring the “mystery” of love at first sight. As it turns out, our search for Mr. or Mrs. Right might simply be an exercise, albeit a risky one, in the power of suggestion. STEPHEN BERTMAN 26 Volume 32, Issue 6 SKEPTICAL INQUIRER he song “Some Enchanted Evening” from Rodgers and Hammerstein’s T South Pacific warns us that when it comes to explaining love at first sight, “Fools give you reasons. Wise men never try.” Notwith standing this lyrical warning, more and more psychologists are trying to solve this age-old mystery. According to a recent survey by marketing expert Earl Naumann (2001), almost two out of three Americans believe in love at first sight. Over half of them claim to have actually experi- enced it, and over half of those went on to marry the person they had instantly fallen in love with (Naumann 2001). In addition, 75 percent of those couples were still married at the time of Naumann’s study, a figure far higher than the national average. The theory of love at first sight goes all the way back to the days of the ancient Greeks, who worshiped the love goddess Aphrodite (the Romans would later call her Venus). Aphrodite Studies have shown that people who are in love look alike—more so than could overwhelm mere mortals with her immense power and chance would allow. take control of their lives by overriding both common sense and conscience. In one legendary case, a handsome Trojan prince into so many leather wallets and echoed with passion in the lyrics named Paris fell in love with a beautiful Spartan queen named of so many love songs.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachel and Leah
    1 Rachel and Leah Like brother stories, a sister story is a narrative paradigm that construes the family primarily upon its horizontal axis. In a sister story, identity is determined and the narrative is defined by the sibling bond, as opposed to the more hierarchical parent-child relationship. As I note in my introduction, brother stories dominate the Bible. By the time we meet sisters Rachel and Leah in Genesis 29, Cain has killed Abel, Isaac has usurped Ishmael, and Jacob has deceived Esau. At the conclusion of Rachel and Leah’s sister story, brothers return to the spotlight as Joseph and his brothers become the focus of the narrative. The Bible’s prevailing trope of fraternal rivalry is essentially about patrilineal descent in which paired brothers fight for their father’s and for God’s blessing. Pairing the brothers helps focus the rivalry and makes clear who is the elder and who is the younger and who, therefore, should have the legitimate claim to their father’s property.1 There can be only one winner, one blessed heir in the patrilineal narratives. Naturally, a good story defies cultural expectations, and younger brothers, more often than not, claim their father’s and God’s blessings. Examining this motif in separate works, both Frederick E. Greenspahn and Jon D. Levenson observe how the status of the Bible’s younger sons reflects Israel’s status, and how their stories reflect Israel’s national story.2 Like Israel, younger sons have no inherent right to the status they acquire in the course of their narratives.3 And like Israel, younger sons must experience exile and humiliation to acquire their blessings.4 Isaac faces his father’s knife.
    [Show full text]
  • Love (Components) Zahra Sattaur, Lisa Lashley, Charles Golden Nova
    Love (Components) Zahra Sattaur, Lisa Lashley, Charles Golden Nova Southeastern University, College of Psychology Several theories have emerged over the years to explain love. These theories have emerged in order to understand the nature of one’s experience of love in daily life. The two dominating theories on love are those proposed by John Alan Lee and Robert Sternberg. Lee’s model suggested a model which includes six styles of love, three which are primary, and three that are considered secondary. The primary styles of love are Eros or passionate love, Ludus or game-playing love, and Storge which is friendship-based love. The secondary styles of love are Pragma or practical love, Mania which is possessive love, and Agape which is altruistic love. Lee sought to describe the styles of loving in a relationship as opposed to describing types of people in the relationship. Sternberg’s triangular theory of love suggests that love can be explained via three components forming the ends of a triangle. At the top of the triangle is intimacy, while passion makes up the bottom left corner of the triangle, and decision and commitment make up the bottom right corner of the triangle. The position of these elements within the triangle has no significant relevance, but it useful to explain the overall model. This newer model of love has been proven in research to be more reliable and is more generally accepted, as it includes factors that are included in other models. Within this theory, the intimacy component refers to feeling close and connected in a relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam Noah Abraham Sarah Isaac Jacob Rachel Leah Joseph Moses
    ADAM NOAH ABRAHAM SARAH ISAAC JACOB RACHEL LEAH JOSEPH MOSES ABIMELECH MIRIAM AARON SAMUEL SAMSON (from the time of the Judges) RUTH NAOMI GIDEON HANNAH CAIN METHUSELAH PHARAOH DEBORAH JOSHUA ELI Cut apart these squares. You can glue them randomly onto a copy of the following page with the blank squares, or you can just set out these name squares on the table, forming them into a 5 by 5 square shape. If you use the no-glue method, you can rearrange the squares between games if you want to. TIP: If you want to use the no-glue method, consider copying the name squares onto heavy card stock paper. Old Testament people Bingo Clue set 1: 1) As a child, he heard God calling his name. (Samuel) 2) She had a baby when she was 90. (Sarah) 3) He got tricked into marrying a woman he did not love. (Jacob) 4) He had 3 sons after his 500th birthday. (Noah) 5) She died while giving birth to her second son. (Rachel) 6) He won a battle with only 300 soldiers... and a lot of help from God! (Gideon) 7) His name means “my father is king.” His father was Gideon. (Abimelech) 8) She was born in the land of Moab and became an Israelite through marriage. (Ruth) 9) She went to the Tabernacle to pray to God to give her a child. (Hannah) 10) He was the first person ever to be born. (Cain) 11) His name means “laughter.” (Isaac) 12) He was born in the land of Egypt and had an older brother and sister.
    [Show full text]