Molecular Markers Used As Genetic
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Chapter 14 Applications of Molecular Marker Technologies in Popf)/us Breeding1 Maria Teresa Cervera, Marc Villar, Patricia Faivre-Rampant, Marie-Christine Goue, Marc Van Montagu, and Wout Boerjan erences to their application in forest trees including poplar. Introduction The second part focuses on Populus spp. and is an overview of current applications of molecular markers in phylogenetic analysis, genetic mapping, and marker-assisted selection. In the 17th and 18th centuries, farmers and tree-breeders in Europe selected individual trees for traits such as fast growth and . Traditional breeding work was based on the analysis of phenotypes and has provided a wealth of infor mation on genetic material through multigeneration pedi Molecular Markers Used as grees. Recent developments in DNA marker technologies have created the possibility of generating new breeding strategies. In Genetic Marker~ ·in Breeding forest trees, these technologies are developed for conifer, Euca- lyptus, and Populus breeding. • For centuries, morphological traits provided the--basis Application of molecular markers to forest tree breeding for plant breeding and contributed to the development of is dependent on the advantages and limitations of tree ge theoretical population genetics. The first genome maps netics. The Populus genus (poplars, cottonwoods, and aspens) were produced by analysis of genetic segregation and link is a good model system for the diverse disciplines of forest age between morphological markers. However, because tree biology (reviewed by Stettler et al. 1996). Populus spe morphological markers can be strongly influenced by the cies have considerable genetic variation; are highly heterozy environment and are limited in number, they are less valu gous; interspecific hybrids can be easily obtained through able in current breeding programs. artificial breeding techniques (Stanton and Villar 1996); and Techniques to analyze proteins (Smithies 1955) have al controlled sexual propagation can be conducted in a green lowed molecular marker identification based on protein house over approximately 3 months. Moreover, the ease of polymorphism.s (Lewontin and Hubby 1966; May 1992). vegetative propagation permits replicated clonal trials to Through developments in molecular biology, different estimate genetic and environmental components of pheno techniques have emerged to detect molecular markers typic variance for traits of interest; the nuclear genome is based on DNA. Using restriction endonucleases (Linn and relatively small (2C = 1.1 pg); and the chromosome number Arber 1968; Meselson and Yuan 1968) allows evaluation (2n =38) is the same for all Populus species (Bradshaw and of DNA sequence variation through the analysis of Restric Stettler 1993; Wang and Hall1995). tion Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP). In 1985, the In the first part of this chapter, we describe marker tech Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technique was devel nologies common! y used in plant breeding, and provide ref- oped based on the amplification of DNA fragments using a thermostable DNA polymerase (Saiki et al. 1985, 1988). Many variants of the PCR strategy have since been estab lished to detect DNA polymorphism.s. The objective of the 1 Klopfenstein, N.B.; Chun, Y. W.; Kim, M.-S.; Ahuja, M.A., eds. PCR variant strategies was to increase the number of mark Dillon, M.C.; Carman, R.C.; Eskew, L.G., tech. eds. 1997. ers analyzed per experiment and the likelihood of identify Micropropagation, genetic engineering, and molecular biology ing markers that display a high Polymorphism Information of Populus. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTA-297. Fort Collins, CO: Content (PIC). Since the plant genotype is analyzed directly U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain by DNA marker technology, environmental or developmen Research Station. 326 p. tal alterations of the phenotype have no effect. 101 Section Ill Molecular Biology Molecular,. Markers in an electric field and differences among alleles encoding these allozymes (Murphy et al. 1990). According to Weising et al. (1995), an ideal marker tech Allozyme analysis comprises: 1) preparation of tissue nology has markers: 1) with .a codominant inheritance extracts using buffers that allow protein extraction while (homo- and heterozygotic states can be discriminated); 2) maintaining enzymatic activity; 2) electrophoretic (starch that are evenly distributed throughout the genome; and or polyacrylamide gel) separation of proteins according 3) with selectively neutral behavior. Moreover, ideal to net charge and size; and 3) allozyme detection after elec marker technology: 1) can reveal many polymorphic loci trophoresis using specific stains. with multiple alleles; 2) is easy, fast, and inexpensive; and Allozyme analysis is easy to perform, inexpensive, and 3} is highly reproducible. technically accessible. Allozyme expression is typically Marker technologies that are currently available com codominant allowing discrimination between homozy bine some of these properties. A marker system should be gous and heterozygous loci and multiple alleles. However, selected on the basis of the genetic analysis to be per allozyme analysis has several drawbacks. The limited num formed. In the following discussion, we describe the prin ber of loci that can be analyzed may restrict attempts to ciples, advantages, and limitations of marker technologies locate markers associated with traits of interest, and the commonly used in poplar breeding (table 1). level of genetic polymorphism within coding sequences is Isozyme and Allozyme Markers relatively low. A new allele can be detected as a polymor Allozymes are enzymes encoded by different alleles of the phism only if nucleotide differences cause amino add sub same gene; thus, they can differ in their amino add sequence, stitutions that affect the electrophoretic mobility. protein structure, and kinetic properties. Allozyme analysis Furthermore, allozymes may be active only at a specific is based on the correlation between differences in mobility physiological stage, tissue, or cell compartment. Other limi- Table 1. Comparison of DNA marker systems (adapted from Mazur and Tingey 1995). RFLP1 RAPD2 SSR3 AFLPTM 4 Assay principle Endonuclease Amplification Amplification Selective digestion and with random of SSRs amplification of hybridization primers DNA fragments Polymorphism Single-base Single-base Repeat l~ngth Single-base type insertions or insertions or insertions or deletions deletions deletions Polymorphism Medium Medium High Medium level Number of 1-2 5-20 1 40-100 different loci assayed in a single reaction Abundance High Very high Medium Very high Dominance Codominant Dominant Codominant DominanVcodominant Amount of DNA 2-10 J.tg 10-25 ng 25-50 ng 250 ng required DNA sequence No No Yes No required Radioactive Yes/no No No Yes/no detection Cost Medium/high Low High Medium 1 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism 2 Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA 3 Simple Sequence Repeats 4 Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism ,.... Registered trademark in the Benelux 102 USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-297. 1997. Applications of Molecular Marker Technologies in Populus Breeding tations, such as post-transcriptional modifications or the ers were used to study inter- and intraspecific variation in presence of isozymes with identical mobility but encoded Populus (Keirn et al. 1989; Liu and Fumier 1993b). by different loci, can hamper interpretation of the zymo RFLPs can also be obtained from chloroplast DNA gram (banding pattern) analysis. (cpDNA) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Two differ Linkage analysis of isozyme loci was performed on ent approaches are useful to study RFLPs in cytoplasmic many forest trees such as Populus spp. (Liu and Furnier DNA: 1) isolation of cp or mtDNA, digestion with restric 1993a}, Larix laricina (Cheliak and Pitel 1985}, Eucalyptus tion enzymes, electrophoretic separation, and visualiza regnans (Moran and Bell 1983), Pinus spp. (Conkle 1981), tion of RFLPs by ethidium bromide or silver staining; and Pinus radiata (Moran et al. 1983), Pinus rigida (Guries et al. 2) isolation and digestion of total DNA, electrophoretic 1978), Pinus strobus (Eckert et al. 1981), and Pinus taeda separation, and Southern blotting using total cp or mtDNA (Adams and Joly 1980). Isozyme analysis was used to iden or specific cp or mtDNA sequences as a probe. Various tify clones of the genus Populus (Cheliak and Dancik 1982; studies were conducted on Populus based on cpDNARFLPs Hyun et al. 1987; Liu and Fumier 1993b; Lund et al. 1992; (Mejnartowicz 1991; Rajora and Dancik 1995a, 1995b) and Raj?ra 1988, 1989a; Rajora and Zsuffa 1989}. mtDNA RFLPs (Barrett et al. 1993; Radetzky 1990). Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Technologies RFLP analysis, a DNA-based marker technology used Many variant methods have been developed since the in plant breeding and plant genetics (Neale and Williams invention of PCR technology in 1985 (Innis et al. 1990); 1991; Tanksley et al. 1989}, is based on polymorphism ob some allow detection of DNA polymorphisms. served after DNA digestion with 1 or more restriction en Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) mark zymes. Resulting fragments are electrophoretically ers are generated by PCR amplification using arbitrary separated in agarose