Applications of Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, Vol. 21, No. 4 Copyright © 1991, Institute for Clinical Science, Inc. Applications of Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism SHESHADRI NARAYANAN, Ph .D. Department of Pathology, New York Medical College/Metropolitan Hospital Center, New York, NY 10029 ABSTRACT The availability of a variety of restriction endonuclease enzymes that cleave deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) at specific sites has made it possible to identify the presence of polymorphic regions in the isolated fragments. Such restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) results owing to a variation in the number of tandem repeats (VNTR) of a short DNA segment. These VNTR sequences can uniquely specify an individual and, as such, are used in DNA fingerprinting and in paternity testing. Restriction frag ment length polymorphism may be found close to a disease gene, and, as such, can be used as a genetic disease marker. Certain criteria need to be fulfilled, however, for RFLP to be useful as a genetic disease marker, such as its closeness to the disease gene. Materials and methodology for detect ing RFLP are reviewed with the current emphasis on amplification proce dures utilizing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Introduction nucleases can recognize specific DNA sequences four to six bases long. The evi The discovery of enzymes in bacteria dence for the existence of restriction that cleave the DNA of a foreign intruder enzymes in bacteria emerged in the is a mechanism by which bacteria pro 1960s and was followed up in 1970 by the tects itself from outside attack, such as isolation and purification of a restriction invasion by virus. While these enzymes, enzyme from the bacterium H aem o called restriction nucleases, can recog philus influenzae. Since then, restriction nize specific sites in foreign DNA and enzymes have been isolated from over cleave them, they are, however, pre 200 bacterial strains, and the specific vented from attacking the DNA of the base sequences cleaved by these bacterial cell. This is accomplished by enzymes have been identified. The vari another enzyme which methylates the ation in specificity of restriction enzymes specific bacterial DNA sequence that is illustrated in the example given in fig would otherwise have been recognized ure 1. by the restriction enzyme, thereby pro While some restriction nucleases, such viding a mechanism for the restriction as Hind II isolated from the bacterium enzymes to distinguish between the bac Hemophilus influenzae, cleave at the terial and foreign DNA. These restriction center of their recognition sites produc- 291 0091-7370/91/0700-0291 $00.90 © Institute for Clinical Science, Inc. 292 NARAYANAN Restriction morphism is within the restriction Source (Microorganism) Enzvme Base Sequence enzyme site, short or long DNA frag ments are obtained after treatment with Escherichia coli Ry-13 EcoRI 51...G-1-AATTC...31 specific restriction endonucleases. These 31...CTTAa Tg ...51 restriction fragment-length polymor Providencia Stuartii Pstl 51...CTGCAÌG...3' phisms (RFLP) may be found close to a 31...GÎACGTC...51 disease gene, and, as such, family studies of RFLP can serve as a genetic dis Haemophilus Hind III 51...AÌAGCTT...31 ease marker. influenzae Rd 31...TTCGAÌ-A...51 Haemophilus Hhal 51...GCGÌC...31 Basis for Restriction Fragment Length haemoiyticus 31...CÎGCG...51 Polymorphisms (RFLP) ATCC10014 Moraxella species Mspl 51...C|CGG...31 Restriction fragment length polymor 31...GGCÎC...51 phism results owing to a variation in the FIGURE 1. Variation in specificity of restriction number of tandem repeats of a short DNA enzymes. Explanation of symbols. A = Adenine, T segment. This variable number of tan = thymine, G = Guanine, C = Cytosine. The dem repeats (VNTR) serves as the basis arrow indicates the position of cleavage by the restriction enzyme. of DNA fingerprinting.10 Thus, one indi vidual may have, for instance, 14 repeats of a DNA segment on one chromosome ing fragments that do not stick together, and eight repeats on the other, whereas other restriction enzymes, such as EcoRI another individual may have different isolated from Escherichia coli, cleave VNTR patterns. Tandemly repeated away from the center of its recognition DNA sequences can be very short sites producing fragments with sticky repeats of a simple sequence such as ends. The impetus for recombinant DNA (deoxy cytidine-deoxy adenine)n (deoxy technology came with the finding that guanine-deoxy thymine)n which are col these sticky fragments can be joined or lectively called (CA)n blocks.18 Consider annealed with another complementary ing that in the human genome there are sticky end produced by restriction 50,000 to 100,000 (CA)n blocks with n enzyme cleavage using an enzyme called being in the range of 15 to 30, a (CA)n DNA ligase.11 The availability of such block can be expected for every 30 to 60 restriction enzymes, also called restric kilobase segment of the human genome. tion endonucleases, has also resulted in It has been proposed that these blocks an explosion of research in uncovering may have a role in gene regulation polymorphic regions in DNA. or recombination. Thus, the use of restriction endonu clease enzymes that cleave DNA at spe cific sites has uncovered the presence of Usefulness and Criteria for RFLP as polymorphic regions through the length Genetic Disease Marker of the resulting fragment. In general, one in every 200 to 500 nucleotides in regions not coding for proteins is polymorphic. It The usefulness of RFLP as a genetic is known that many different individuals marker arises from the fact that RFLPs have a distinct number or sequence of are more abundant when compared to bases in a specific area of the genome. polymorphisms at the level of protein. Depending on whether or not the poly This is so since nucleotide diversity or APPLICATIONS OF RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM 293 the extent of polymorphism at any locus able region (HVR).10 This hypervariable is found on an average of one in every 500 region can be characterized by using base pairs of DNA.2 multiple restriction enzymes, and the dif For RFLP to be useful as a genetic dis ferences in the lengths of the resulting ease marker, certain criteria need to be fragments can be used to establish the fulfilled. First, the RFLP has to be very presence of a specific genetic disease. close to the disease gene, since the closer Indeed, this approach is limited only by the RFLP to the disease gene, the less the ability of the electrophoretic gel to would be the likelihood of recombination resolve small differences in the sizes of to occur. Under such circumstances, the the restriction fragments. accuracy of the test as a specific disease marker would be very high. Indeed, as Materials and Typical RFLP Procedure the two loci get closer to each other, the recombination fraction, 0, approaches A variety of samples can be used for zero, making the RFLP very specific in testing of RFLP. These range from terms of its ability to screen for genetic peripheral blood, isolated lymphocytes, disease. Accuracy can, in fact, be to tissues such as cultured lymphocytes, increased further by using what are fibroblasts, or placenta. called flanking markers, which are actu A typical RFLP procedure would ally RFLPs very close to both sides of the involve extraction of DNA from approxi defective gene. The rationale for using mately 10 to 20 ml aliquots of heparin- such flanking markers is that even if ized whole blood. The extract is digested recombination occured between one overnight with a five to 10 fold excess of RFLP and the disease locus, it is highly restriction endonuclease. The resulting likely that the other RFLP would segre DNA fragments can be detected by a gate with the disease.3 variety of techniques which are summa rized in figure 2. Types of RFLP for Studying Genetic Disease Methods of Detecting RFLPs A few genetic defects can be detected Two typical approaches merit discus directly by isolating an RFLP that results sion. from a difference in a single base pair. A well known example of such a single S o u t h e r n B l o t t i n g base pair mutation is the substitution of adenine (A) for thymine (T) in codon 6 of In this procedure, the DNA fragments the B-globin gene, resulting in valine that result from restriction endonuclease being substituted for glutamine, and giv digestion can be separated by either aga ing rise to sickle cell hemoglobin.8 This rose or polyacrylamide gel electrophore approach of detecting an RFLP that sis. The denatured DNA fragments are results from a point mutation is, however, transferred or blotted to nylon or nitrocel limited to only a few genetic diseases. lulose membranes. The fragments on the For the most part, RFLPs that result membrane are hybridized with radio owing to a variation in the number of tan labelled 32p complementary DNA (c- dem repeats (VNTR) at a locus are useful DNA) probe. The membrane is washed for studying genetic disease. These to remove unhybridized probe, and the VNTR DNA sequences are made up of a hybridized bands are detected by autora variable number of short repetitive DNA diography, which entails exposure of the sequences characterized as a hypervari hybridized bands to x-ray film at — 70°C. 294 NARAYANAN HEPARINIZED BLOOD I EXTRACT DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID I DIGEST OVERNIGHT WITH RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE I SOUTHERN BLOTTING AMPLIFY FRAGMENTS BY i POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION SEPARATE DNA FRAGMENTS ON AGAROSE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS 4 BLOT OR TRANSFER TO NYLON SEPARATE AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT SPOT AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT MEMBRANES BY ELECTROPHORESIS. TO SOLID SUPPORT. VISUALIZE BANDS BY DETECTION BY HYBRIDIZATION I STAINING GEL. TO SPECIFIC PROBES. HYBRIDIZE TO RADIOLABELLED (32p) COMPLEMENTARY DNA (cDNA) PROBE 4 WASH TO REMOVE UNHYBRIDIZED PROBE 4 EXPOSE TO X-RAY FILM (AUTORADIOGRAPHY) TO VISUALIZE HYBRIDIZED BANDS F ig u r e 2.