Locomotion in the Biology of Large Aquatic Vertebrates

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Locomotion in the Biology of Large Aquatic Vertebrates Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 119:629-641. 1990 <S> Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 1990 Locomotio Biologe th n i f Largyo e Aquatic Vertebrates PAU . WEBLW B Department of Biology Schooland of Natural Resources University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1115. USA. and Ministry of Agriculture. Fisheries Food.and Fisheries Laboratory Lowestoft. Suffolk NR33 OHT, England VIVIAN DE BUFFR£NIL Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle. 75005 Paris. France Abstract.—As aquatic vertebrates increase in size, hydrofoils, which use lift to generate thrust, increasingle ar y use propulsorss da factoe On . r affectin magnitude gth life t th are e forcf eo th a s ei of the propulsor. Resistance to cruising and sprints is mainly due to drag, but inertia is important during maneuvers when animals accelerate or turn. The inertia of the body and entrained water, which is proportional to body volume, resists acceleration. Because a thrust that is proportional to surface are s usei a maneuveo dt a resistancr e tha s proportionai t volumeo t l , acceleration performance and maneuverability are expected to decline with increasing size. This trend is ame- liorated to some extent by the high swimming speeds attainable by warm-bodied vertebrates and the reduced resistanc acceleratioo et n characteristi skeletone th f co dolphinf so ichthyosaursd san . Maneuvers are essential for capture of elusive prey and avoidance of predators. As they increase in size, aquatic vertebrates use various means to ensure that their prey are less maneuverable than they. These include consumption of increasingly smaller prey relative to predator body size (cul- minatin filten gi r feedin largese th y gb t aquatic vertebrates); behavior concentrateo st , disturbd an , disorient prey; and ambushing or suction feeding that avoid whole-body acceleration. Advantages of warm muscles are seen in the ability of endotherms to take more maneuverable prey than can ectotherms of the same size. Young stages of large aquatic vertebrates could be especially vulnerable predatorso t ; viviparit r spawninyo productivn gi e patches provide r rapifo s d growth through vulnerable stages. All organisms must function within limits im- that equal totae th s l resistanc bode d th yan f o e posed by laws that describe the properties and appendages at every instant. Both thrust and re- interaction f matteso r (Danie Webd an l b 1987). sistance arise from transfer f momentuso m be- These restric range th t optionf eo forr d fo smtwee an watere animae th nth d . an Thesl e transfers function as animal performance approaches the are described in terms of a small set of mecha- boundarie physicay b t sse l laws. Thus, physical nisms: friction drag, pressure drag, accelliftd an , - principle usee b predico dt n stesca d an tt ideas, eration reaction (Danie Webd an l b 1987; Webb leadin fulleo gt r understandin biologe th f g o f yo 1988). organisms (Bartholomew 1987; Danie Webd an l b Frictio r viscouo n s drag arises from velocity 1987; Webb 1988) apple W . y this approac o ht gradient whicn i s h viscosity resist e relativth s e consider the consequences of large size for loco- motion of adjacent water molecules. For verte- motor capabilities of aquatic vertebrates. We first brates, large velocity gradients and viscous forces discuss mechanical concepts and forces acting on typically occur in a thin layer—the boundary lay- swimmers. These set constraints on function, of er—on body and propulsor surfaces. The viscous whic considee hw r maneuverabilit e mosb o ytt forc s proportionai e surfaco t e l th o et ared an a important. We then explore the implications of square of speed. these constraints for aquatic vertebrates in terms Pressure drag occurs because the flow pattern of muscle temperature regulation, morpholog d ydifferan s upstrea downstread man solia mf o d object anatomy, predator-prey interactions, foraging sucvertebrata s ha e bodflaa r ty o surfac e that patterns lifd ean , history. move r wits inciden e oa lik hth n ea t flow normal surfacee th boundaro e t .Th y layer eventually sep- . _, arates from the surface of most vertebrate-sized m r oorceo s object created san waksa e downstream prese Th . - Aquatic vertebrates use the tail and other ap- sure in the wake is lower than the pressure up- pendages to swim. These propulsors generate thrust stream, and the resulting pressure difference re- 629 630 WEB BUFFRENID BAN L tards forward motion. Streamlining delays <»}L/u= a (1) separation of the boundary layer from body until and downstrea close is ti th eo t m (trailing o p bodyfa ) ti , hencd an e minimizes pressure drag. Conversely, Re Lulv,= (2) ensurer anoa s that separation occurs early, which L = characteristic length, usually total length; maximizes pressure drag. In either situation, pres- velocity= u ; sure drag is proportional to surface area and the v = kinematic viscosity of water; squar speedf eo . a= radia) n frequency, rf\ Liftforce th , e generate winga y db , also arises oscillatio= f n frequency. from a pressure difference between opposite sur- faces of an object. In this case, the object moves Reynolde Th s numbe largr rfo e vertebrates typ- at a small angle to the incident flow, and the ically exceeds 10s. As a result, drag, lift, and ac- boundary layer separates fro e surfacmth e only celeration reactio dominane th e nar t forces acting close to the trailing edge. Water is accelerated over bode opropulsorsd nth yan relative Th . e impor- one surface, resulting in a lower pressure than on steade tanc th unsteadd f eyo an y force compo- the other surface. The pressure difference Gift) is nent estimates si Whe. a y objecdn b na t oscillates oriented approximately normal to the incident many times during the time a particle of water flow, and its magnitude is proportional to surface traverses the object's length, or chord, that water area and the square of speed. particle is accelerated and decelerated during its Acceleration of an object dissipates energy by passage. The largs i acceleratio d na ean n reaction inducing acceleration of the water in the vicinity force e largear s . Hydromechanical analyses of the body. This energy can be visualized as a (Lighthill 1975; Daniel 1984) show this occurs resistance increment, the acceleration reaction, when a exceeds 0.4. Conversely, if an object os- equated to that of an added mass of water accel- cillates slowly thao s , particlta watef eo r travers- erated with the object. Acceleration resistance is t inacceleratechore gno th s di d much fros mit hence proportional to acceleration rate and mass. steade path th smals i d ya , an lforce s dominate. Several classification f theso s e n i force e ar s This occurs whe less i nsa than 0.1. Both steady common use, linking force termn i s f shareso d unsteadd an y force components shoul takee db n variables that affect their respective magnitudes. int (Danie4 o 0. accoun Webd < lan a 0.r b1< tfo Acceleration reactio proportionans i masso lt d ,an 1987). hence volume t alsi calles o i s , dvolumea force. For propulsors, a decreases with increasing an- It is also proportional to acceleration, or the rate imal size. Thus/for oscillating propulsor pros si - of change of velocity with time. Therefore, accel- portional to L-°45 to L-1 (Peters 1983; Caider eration reaction is defined as an unsteady force. 1984; Heglund and Taylor 1988). As a result, <r Dra Hd proportionae Agan ar surface th o t l e area approaches 0.1 for propulsors of large vertebrates of an object and are called surface forces. In ad- (Daniel and Webb 1987). Steady forces also be- dition, the functione yar f speedo s theo s , y also come larger relative to unsteady forces as ampli- callee ar d steady forces. tude increases. The amplitudes of propulsor mo- Animals may employ drag, lift, and acceleration tions increase roughly wit (PeterhL s 1983), which reactio generato nt e thrust. Eac f thesho e forces further increase importance sth steadf eo y forces may also contribute to resistance, although lift for propulsor largef so r organisms. probabl uses yresistanca i s da e force only during The body does not oscillate as much as the tail, braking (see Danie Webd lan b 1987; Webb 1988). and tuna-shaped vertebrate visualizee b n sca s da magnitude Th relativd ean e importanc thesf eo e a propulsor attached to a more-or-less rigid body forces vary with flow conditions. Whe animan na l (Lighthill 1977). The bode th nr verys i < fo r y much swims well belo water/aie wth r surface, flow con- smaller than 0.1. ditions are related to reduced frequency (a) and Thus draexpectee lifd ar tgan increase b o dt - Reynolds number (Re). Reduced frequency indi- ingly important for thrust and resistance as aquat- cate extene sth whico t h oscillation objectn a f so , ic vertebrates increase in size because Re is high such as a propulsor, affect the flow of a fluid pass- and a becomes small. Acceleration reaction will ing over that object. Reynolds number indicates still have an effect, mainly for the propulsors of the relative importance of pressure drag, lift, and medium-sized vertebrates (Daniel and Webb acceleration reaction compared to viscous forces. 1987), but energy expended in overcoming these These terms are formally defined as forces more commonly contribute o energt s y LOCOMOTIO LARGF NO E AQUATIC VERTEBRATES 631 efficiencwastagw lo d ean y (Danie Webd lan b 1987; Large aspect ratio and tapering of a hydrofoil to- Webb 1988).
Recommended publications
  • Fish Locomotion: Recent Advances and New Directions
    MA07CH22-Lauder ARI 6 November 2014 13:40 Fish Locomotion: Recent Advances and New Directions George V. Lauder Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2015. 7:521–45 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on swimming, kinematics, hydrodynamics, robotics September 19, 2014 The Annual Review of Marine Science is online at Abstract marine.annualreviews.org Access provided by Harvard University on 01/07/15. For personal use only. Research on fish locomotion has expanded greatly in recent years as new This article’s doi: approaches have been brought to bear on a classical field of study. Detailed Annu. Rev. Marine. Sci. 2015.7:521-545. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org 10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015614 analyses of patterns of body and fin motion and the effects of these move- Copyright c 2015 by Annual Reviews. ments on water flow patterns have helped scientists understand the causes All rights reserved and effects of hydrodynamic patterns produced by swimming fish. Recent developments include the study of the center-of-mass motion of swimming fish and the use of volumetric imaging systems that allow three-dimensional instantaneous snapshots of wake flow patterns. The large numbers of swim- ming fish in the oceans and the vorticity present in fin and body wakes sup- port the hypothesis that fish contribute significantly to the mixing of ocean waters. New developments in fish robotics have enhanced understanding of the physical principles underlying aquatic propulsion and allowed intriguing biological features, such as the structure of shark skin, to be studied in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • PALEONTOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT: 6Th AVENUE and WADSWORTH BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, CITY of LAKEWOOD, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO
    PALEONTOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT: 6th AVENUE AND WADSWORTH BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, CITY OF LAKEWOOD, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared for: TEC Inc. 1746 Cole Boulevard, Suite 265 Golden, CO 80401 Prepared by: Paul C. Murphey, Ph.D. and David Daitch M.S. Rocky Mountain Paleontology 4614 Lonespur Court Oceanside, CA 92056 303-514-1095; 760-758-4019 www.rockymountainpaleontology.com Prepared under State of Colorado Paleontological Permit 2007-33 January, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 DEFINITION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES........... 4 3.0 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 6 4.0. LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS......................................... 7 4.1. Federal................................................................................................................................. 7 4.2. State..................................................................................................................................... 8 4.3. County................................................................................................................................. 8 4.4. City.....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum Arthropod Silvia Rondon, and Mary Corp, OSU Extension Entomologist and Agronomist, Respectively Hermiston Research and Extension Center, Hermiston, Oregon
    Phylum Arthropod Silvia Rondon, and Mary Corp, OSU Extension Entomologist and Agronomist, respectively Hermiston Research and Extension Center, Hermiston, Oregon Member of the Phyllum Arthropoda can be found in the seas, in fresh water, on land, or even flying freely; a group with amazing differences of structure, and so abundant that all the other animals taken together are less than 1/6 as many as the arthropods. Well-known members of this group are the Kingdom lobsters, crayfish and crabs; scorpions, spiders, mites, ticks, Phylum Phylum Phylum Class the centipedes and millipedes; and last, but not least, the Order most abundant of all, the insects. Family Genus The Phylum Arthropods consist of the following Species classes: arachnids, chilopods, diplopods, crustaceans and hexapods (insects). All arthropods possess: • Exoskeleton. A hard protective covering around the outside of the body (divided by sutures into plates called sclerites). An insect's exoskeleton (integument) serves as a protective covering over the body, but also as a surface for muscle attachment, a water-tight barrier against desiccation, and a sensory interface with the environment. It is a multi-layered structure with four functional regions: epicuticle (top layer), procuticle, epidermis, and basement membrane. • Segmented body • Jointed limbs and jointed mouthparts that allow extensive specialization • Bilateral symmetry, whereby a central line can divide the body Insect molting or removing its into two identical halves, left and right exoesqueleton • Ventral nerve
    [Show full text]
  • Three Gray Classics on the Biomechanics of Animal Movement
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Harvard University - DASH Three Gray Classics on the Biomechanics of Animal Movement The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Lauder, G. V., Eric Tytell. 2004. Three Gray Classics on the Biomechanics of Animal Movement. Journal of Experimental Biology 207, no. 10: 1597–1599. doi:10.1242/jeb.00921. Published Version doi:10.1242/jeb.00921 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:30510313 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA JEB Classics 1597 THREE GRAY CLASSICS locomotor kinematics, muscle dynamics, JEB Classics is an occasional ON THE BIOMECHANICS and computational fluid dynamic column, featuring historic analyses of animals moving through publications from The Journal of OF ANIMAL MOVEMENT water. Virtually every recent textbook in Experimental Biology. These the field either reproduces one of Gray’s articles, written by modern experts figures directly or includes illustrations in the field, discuss each classic that derive their inspiration from his paper’s impact on the field of figures (e.g. Alexander, 2003; Biewener, biology and their own work. A 2003). PDF of the original paper accompanies each article, and can be found on the journal’s In his 1933a paper, Gray aimed to website as supplemental data.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrates and Invertebrates
    Vertebrates and invertebrates The animal kingdom is divided into two groups: vertebrates and invertebrates. Vertebrates have been around for millions of years but have evolved and changed over time. The word vertebrate means “having a backbone." Many animals have backbones. You have a backbone. So does a cow, a whale, a fish, a frog, and a bird. Vertebrates are animals that have a backbone. Most animals have a backbone that is made of bones joined together to form a skeleton. Our skeleton gives us our shape and allows us to move. Mammals, fish, birds, reptiles, and amphibians have Vertebrae backbones so they are all vertebrates. Each bone that makes up the backbone Scientists classify vertebrates into five classes: is called a vertebra. These are the • Mammals building blacks that form the backbone, • Fish also known as the spinal cord. The • Birds vertebrae protect and support your • Reptiles spine. Without a backbone, you would not • Amphibians be able to move any part of your body. Animals without a backbone are called invertebrates. Most The human animals are invertebrates. In fact, 95% of all living creatures backbone has 26 on Earth are invertebrates. vertebrae. Arthropods are the largest group of invertebrates. Insects make up a large part of this group. All insects, such as ladybugs, ants, grasshoppers, and bumblebees have three body sections and six legs. Most arthropods live on land, but some of these fascinating creatures live in water. Lobsters, crabs, and shrimp are arthropods that live in the oceans. Many invertebrates have skeletons on the outside of their A frog only has bodies called exoskeletons.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Phylum Chordata
    Unifying Themes 1. Chordate evolution is a history of innovations that is built upon major invertebrate traits •bilateral symmetry •cephalization •segmentation •coelom or "gut" tube 2. Chordate evolution is marked by physical and behavioral specializations • For example the forelimb of mammals has a wide range of structural variation, specialized by natural selection 3. Evolutionary innovations and specializations led to adaptive radiations - the development of a variety of forms from a single ancestral group Characteristics of the Chordates 1. Notochord 2. dorsal hollow nerve cord 3. pharyngeal gill slits 4. postanal tail 5. endostyle Characteristics of the Chordates Notochord •stiff, flexible rod, provides internal support • Remains throughout the life of most invertebrate chordates • only in the embryos of vertebrate chordates Characteristics of the Chordates cont. Dorsal Hollow Nerve Cord (Spinal Cord) •fluid-filled tube of nerve tissue, runs the length of the animal, just dorsal to the notochord • Present in chordates throughout embryonic and adult life Characteristics of the Chordates cont. Pharyngeal gill slits • Pairs of opening through the pharynx • Invertebrate chordates use them to filter food •In fishes the gill sits develop into true gills • In reptiles, birds, and mammals the gill slits are vestiges (occurring only in the embryo) Characteristics of the Chordates cont. Endostyle • mucous secreting structure found in the pharynx floor (traps small food particles) Characteristics of the Chordates cont. Postanal Tail • works with muscles (myomeres) & notochord to provide motility & stability • Aids in propulsion in nonvertebrates & fish but vestigial in later lineages SubPhylum Urochordata Ex: tunicates or sea squirts • Sessile as adults, but motile during the larval stages • Possess all 5 chordate characteristics as larvae • Settle head first on hard substrates and undergo a dramatic metamorphosis • tail, notochord, muscle segments, and nerve cord disappear SubPhylum Urochordata cont.
    [Show full text]
  • Fins, Limbs, and Tails: Outgrowths and Axial Patterning in Vertebrate Evolution Michael I
    Review articles Fins, limbs, and tails: outgrowths and axial patterning in vertebrate evolution Michael I. Coates1* and Martin J. Cohn2 Summary Current phylogenies show that paired fins and limbs are unique to jawed verte- brates and their immediate ancestry. Such fins evolved first as a single pair extending from an anterior location, and later stabilized as two pairs at pectoral and pelvic levels. Fin number, identity, and position are therefore key issues in vertebrate developmental evolution. Localization of the AP levels at which develop- mental signals initiate outgrowth from the body wall may be determined by Hox gene expression patterns along the lateral plate mesoderm. This regionalization appears to be regulated independently of that in the paraxial mesoderm and axial skeleton. When combined with current hypotheses of Hox gene phylogenetic and functional diversity, these data suggest a new model of fin/limb developmental evolution. This coordinates body wall regions of outgrowth with primitive bound- aries established in the gut, as well as the fundamental nonequivalence of pectoral and pelvic structures. BioEssays 20:371–381, 1998. ௠ 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Introduction over and again to exemplify fundamental concepts in biological Vertebrate appendages include an amazing diversity of form, theory. The striking uniformity of teleost pectoral fin skeletons from the huge wing-like fins of manta rays or the stumpy limbs of illustrated Geoffroy Saint-Hilair’s discussion of ‘‘special analo- frogfishes, to ichthyosaur paddles, the extraordinary fingers of gies,’’1 while tetrapod limbs exemplified Owen’s2 related concept aye-ayes, and the fin-like wings of penguins. The functional of ‘‘homology’’; Darwin3 then employed precisely the same ex- diversity of these appendages is similarly vast and, in addition to ample as evidence of evolutionary descent from common ances- various modes of locomotion, fins and limbs are also used for try.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander 2013 Principles-Of-Animal-Locomotion.Pdf
    .................................................... Principles of Animal Locomotion Principles of Animal Locomotion ..................................................... R. McNeill Alexander PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON AND OXFORD Copyright © 2003 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 3 Market Place, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1SY All Rights Reserved Second printing, and first paperback printing, 2006 Paperback ISBN-13: 978-0-691-12634-0 Paperback ISBN-10: 0-691-12634-8 The Library of Congress has cataloged the cloth edition of this book as follows Alexander, R. McNeill. Principles of animal locomotion / R. McNeill Alexander. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 0-691-08678-8 (alk. paper) 1. Animal locomotion. I. Title. QP301.A2963 2002 591.47′9—dc21 2002016904 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Galliard and Bulmer Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ pup.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 1098765432 Contents ............................................................... PREFACE ix Chapter 1. The Best Way to Travel 1 1.1. Fitness 1 1.2. Speed 2 1.3. Acceleration and Maneuverability 2 1.4. Endurance 4 1.5. Economy of Energy 7 1.6. Stability 8 1.7. Compromises 9 1.8. Constraints 9 1.9. Optimization Theory 10 1.10. Gaits 12 Chapter 2. Muscle, the Motor 15 2.1. How Muscles Exert Force 15 2.2. Shortening and Lengthening Muscle 22 2.3. Power Output of Muscles 26 2.4. Pennation Patterns and Moment Arms 28 2.5. Power Consumption 31 2.6. Some Other Types of Muscle 34 Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanics of Terrestrial Locomotion: Asymmetric Octopedal and Quadrupedal Gaits
    SCUOLA DI DOTTORATO IN SCIENZE MORFOLOGICHE, FISIOLOGICHE E DELLO SPORT DIPARTIMENTO DI FISIOLOGIA UMANA DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN FISIOLOGIA CICLO XXIV Biomechanics of terrestrial locomotion: asymmetric octopedal and quadrupedal gaits SETTORE SCIENTIFICO DISCIPLINARE BIO-09 PhD Student: Dott. Carlo M. Biancardi Matricola: R08161 Tutor: Prof. Alberto E. Minetti Coordinatore: Prof. Paolo Cavallari Anno Accademico 2010-2011 Table of Contents Abstract...................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ...............................................................................................8 Foreword.................................................................................................................. 8 Objectives .................................................................................................................8 Thesis structure........................................................................................................ 8 Terrestrial legged locomotion ..................................................................9 Introduction .............................................................................................................9 Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial legged locomotion ................................10 Limbs mechanics ..........................................................................................................10 Size differences .............................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • 6.25 Fish Vestibulospinal Circuits Vfinal
    Cover Page Title Vestibulospinal circuits and the development of balance in fish Authors Yunlu Zhu, Kyla R. Hamling, David Schoppik Affiliation Department of Otolaryngology, Department of Neuroscience & Physiology, and the Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States; Contact Information Yunlu Zhu Address: 435 E 30th st, Rm 1145R, New York, NY 10016, United States. Email: [email protected] Phone: 434-242-7311 Kyla R. Hamling Address: 435 E 30th st, Rm 1138, New York, NY 10016, United States. Email: [email protected] Phone: 707-853-7689 David Schoppik Address: 435 E 30th st, Rm 1103, New York, NY 10016, United States. Email: [email protected] Phone: 646-501-4555 Keywords Balance; Hindbrain; Inner ear; Lamprey; Locomotion; Magnocellular; Neural circuit; Octavomotor; Otolith; Teleost; Vestibular; Vestibulospinal; Zebrafish Synopsis The ability to maintain balance and adjust posture through reflexive motor control is vital for animal locomotion. The vestibulospinal nucleus residing in the hindbrain is responsible for relaying inner ear vestibular information to spinal motoneurons and is remarkably conserved from fish to higher vertebrates. Taking the advantage of relatively simple body plan and locomotor behavior, studies in fish have significantly contributed to our understanding of the of the anatomy, connectivity, and function of the vestibulospinal circuits and the development of balance control. Abstract During locomotion, animals engage reflexive motor control to adjust posture and maintain balance. The vestibulospinal nucleus responsible for transmitting vestibular information to the spinal cord is vital for corrective postural adjustments and is remarkably conserved from fish to higher vertebrates. However, little is known about how the vestibulospinal circuitry contributes to balance control.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrates in the Animal Kingdom
    Science Enhanced Scope and Sequence – Grade 5 Vertebrates in the Animal Kingdom Strand Living Systems Topic Investigating characteristics of organisms Primary SOL 5.5 The student will investigate and understand that organisms are made of one or more cells and have distinguishing characteristics that play a vital role in the organism’s ability to survive and thrive in its environment. Key concepts include b) classification of organisms using physical characteristics, body structures, and behavior of the organism; c) traits of organisms that allow them to survive in their environment. Related SOL 5.1 The student will demonstrate an understanding of scientific reasoning, logic, and the nature of science by planning and conducting investigations in which a) items such as rocks, minerals, and organisms are identified using various classification keys. Background Information To study organisms, scientists first look at their characteristics and group the organisms based on the characteristics they share. Some animals are so small that they live on or inside other animals. Others, such as the giant squid, are many meters long and live in the depths of oceans. Animals can swim, crawl, burrow, fly, or not move at all. No matter what their size, where they live, or how they move, all animals must have some basic characteristics in common. All organisms in the animal kingdom (1)) are made of cells, (2 reproduce, (3) grow and develop, (4) have a life cycle, (5) obtain and use energy, and (6) responds and adapt to their environment. In the 18th century, a Swedish scientist named Carolus Linnaeus developed a system to organize living things.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Crossroads in Developmental Biology: Cyclostomes (Lamprey and Hagfish) Sebastian M
    PRIMER SERIES PRIMER 2091 Development 139, 2091-2099 (2012) doi:10.1242/dev.074716 © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: cyclostomes (lamprey and hagfish) Sebastian M. Shimeld1,* and Phillip C. J. Donoghue2 Summary and is appealing because it implies a gradual assembly of vertebrate Lampreys and hagfish, which together are known as the characters, and supports the hagfish and lampreys as experimental cyclostomes or ‘agnathans’, are the only surviving lineages of models for distinct craniate and vertebrate evolutionary grades (i.e. jawless fish. They diverged early in vertebrate evolution, perceived ‘stages’ in evolution). However, only comparative before the origin of the hinged jaws that are characteristic of morphology provides support for this phylogenetic hypothesis. The gnathostome (jawed) vertebrates and before the evolution of competing hypothesis, which unites lampreys and hagfish as sister paired appendages. However, they do share numerous taxa in the clade Cyclostomata, thus equally related to characteristics with jawed vertebrates. Studies of cyclostome gnathostomes, has enjoyed unequivocal support from phylogenetic development can thus help us to understand when, and how, analyses of protein-coding sequence data (e.g. Delarbre et al., 2002; key aspects of the vertebrate body evolved. Here, we Furlong and Holland, 2002; Kuraku et al., 1999). Support for summarise the development of cyclostomes, highlighting the cyclostome theory is now overwhelming, with the recognition of key species studied and experimental methods available. We novel families of non-coding microRNAs that are shared then discuss how studies of cyclostomes have provided exclusively by hagfish and lampreys (Heimberg et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]