DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Figures of Ubicomp: Conceptualizing And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Figures of Ubicomp: Conceptualizing And FIGURES OF UBICOMP: CONCEPTUALIZING AND COMPOSING ACTIONABLE MEDIA By JOHN TINNELL A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2013 1 © 2013 John Tinnell 2 To Hutton 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like thank all of the amazing people in the English Department at the University of Florida, especially Greg Ulmer and Sid Dobrin. Greg’s work models everything I hope to achieve in my own. While I try to not follow his footsteps too obviously, I will always be seeking to further the insights and projects that his books so originally present. For me, Greg is among the masters that his motto gestures toward. Sid, perhaps more than anyone else, helped me come of age as a professional. Because of his constant encouragement and pinpoint advice, I felt as though I had made the transition from graduate student to Assistant Professor before I even started my dissertation. It would have been inconceivable for me to complete this project in under a year without that level of confidence and support. The other two members of my committee, Laurie Gries and Jack Stenner, provided me with vital feedback. Laurie’s capacity to respond to her students’ writing is unparalleled; she saw incongruencies in my writing to which I would otherwise still be blind. Jack voiced criticisms that I did not want to hear, which are the most important to hear. I thank my parents, emphatically, for their support and for doing what they are passionate about and always encouraging me to do the same. My mom has a very unique combination of unwavering determination and limitless generosity; I have relied on her lessons more than ever during the past year. My dad has always been brimming with ideas of all sorts, and many of my best ideas stem from conversations with him. Last but most of all, I thank Kim, for her resilience, as a sounding board and a proofreader; her patience, when I am in the zone; and her readiness to believe in me. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 9 2 THE SPECTER OF TECHNOLOGICAL DETERMINISM ....................................... 19 The Humanistic Study of Media .............................................................................. 23 Technogenesis: The Humanities’ New Enthymeme ............................................... 29 Orality Literacy Electracy ........................................................................................ 44 Toward a Grammatology of Ubicomp ..................................................................... 52 3 GRAMMATIZATION: BERNARD STIEGLER’S THEORY OF TECHNICS AND WRITING ................................................................................................................ 58 The Technics of Writing .......................................................................................... 61 Stiegler and Derrida ................................................................................................ 63 Originary Technicity ................................................................................................ 65 Arche-Writing .......................................................................................................... 71 From the Logic of the Supplementarity to the History of the Supplement ............... 76 Grammatization and Grammatology ....................................................................... 86 Grammatization and Industrial Technics ................................................................. 90 The Grammatization of Real-Time .......................................................................... 93 Grammatization as Method ..................................................................................... 98 Grammatization and Digital Rhetoric .................................................................... 102 4 UBICOMP: WRITING SPACES FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY .............. 109 The Invention of Ubicomp ..................................................................................... 112 Beyond Mobility and Location ............................................................................... 131 The Space of Ubicomp ......................................................................................... 143 Beyond Digital-Physical Convergence .................................................................. 158 5 ACTIONABLE MEDIA: FROM WIMP TO ATLAS ................................................. 169 Introducing Actionable Media ................................................................................ 172 Techno-Geographic Actant-Networks ................................................................... 180 Figures .................................................................................................................. 191 Layers: As Technocultural Category ..................................................................... 195 Layers: As Actionable Media Practice; or, Computing and Writing En Plein Air ... 208 5 LIST OF REFERENCES ............................................................................................. 237 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .......................................................................................... 245 6 Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy FIGURES OF UBICOMP: CONCEPTUALIZING AND COMPOSING ACTIONABLE MEDIA By John Tinnell May 2013 Chair: Gregory L. Ulmer Major: English Since the rise of ubiquitous computing (ubicomp), a growing contingency of scholars from various fields have all attested to the need for new critical categories to help us understand the ways in which digital data now interlocks with physical space. Responding to this need, I propose five rhetorical figures specific to ubicomp interfaces, and, on the basis of these figures, attempt to outline a whole new class of media emerging at the margins of social, mobile, and locative media. For instance, GPS navigation devices are mobile and locative, but these qualities do not begin to account for the technology’s most radical affordance: the capacity to sync with (i.e., generate multimedia in response to) the actions of human and environmental actants in real-time. My term for this emerging set of technologies and techniques is actionable media. Drawing on the military phrase “actionable intelligence,” actionable media describes the compelling ways media can be designed to hinge upon what we are doing while we are doing it. In more theoretical terms, drawing on Bernard Stiegler’s notion of grammatization, actionable media concerns the modalities by which the flux of the Web gets broken down into gramme for acting upon in real-time, as well as the processes by which media break down the continuous movements of actant-networks into networked 7 gramme. Taking GPS navigation, RFID tags, and AR browsers as paradigmatic examples of actionable media, I ask how we might extrapolate from these commonplace scenarios to imagine further possibilities for digital writing and audiovisual media that fully exploit the features of ubicomp platforms. Throughout the work, I comment specifically on actionable media practices implicit in innovative projects done by digital artists, writers, and cultural institutions around the world. Ultimately, I argue that the value of ubicomp projects coincides with their potential to perform in the capacity of actionable media. That is, while the technical phenomena associated with mobile devices, geoinformation, and digital-physical convergence are often astonishing at first glance; the historical worth of these basic mechanics will have been measured by the advent of compelling cultural practices that we are just beginning to glimpse. 8 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION For media theorists and technologists, “ubiquitous computing” marks the paradigmatic horizon of current innovations in mobile media, locative networks, wearable devices, augmented reality, and smart objects. As an umbrella term, ubiquitous computing (ubicomp) typically signifies the onset a third wave in the history of the modern computer. Ubiquitous systems promise to break from the PC era and the models of computing that defined it, creating as many new possibilities and new problems as the shift from mainframe computers to PCs initiated during the 1980s. By virtue of this pending transition, the Internet is also said to be entering a third stage often referred to as Web 3.0. Commentators who forecast this scenario—which many people are already starting to experience—claim that the Web will be all around us, always on and accessible via smartphones, tablets, televisions, cars, and many other everyday items. No humanities scholar can deny the profound changes undergone in the study of writing, rhetoric, and media in the wake of personal computing and Web 2.0. In the midst of societies characterized by permanent technological innovation, many leading scholars are variously engaged in building theories of the present. They share an aim to understand current digital developments in reference to existing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monet and American Impressionism
    Harn Museum of Art Educator Resource Monet & Impressionism About the Artist Claude Monet was born in Paris on November 14, 1840. He enjoyed drawing lessons in school and began making and selling caricatures at age seventeen. In 1858, he met landscape artist Eugène Boudin (1824-1898) who introduced him to plein-air (outdoor) painting. During the 1860s, only a few of Monet’s paintings were accepted for exhibition in the prestigious annual exhibitions known as the Salons. This rejection led him to join with other Claude Monet, 1899 artists to form an independent group, later known as the Impressionists. Photo by Nadar During the 1860s and 1870s, Monet developed his technique of using broken, rhythmic brushstrokes of pure color to represent atmosphere, light and visual effects while depicting his immediate surroundings in Paris and nearby villages. During the next decade, his fortune began to improve as a result of a growing base of support from art dealers and collectors, both in Europe and the United States. By the mid-1880s, his paintings began to receive critical “Everyone discusses my acclaim. art and pretends to understand, as if it were By 1890, Monet was financially secure enough to purchase a house in Giverny, a rural town in Normandy. During these later years, Monet began painting the same subject over and over necessary to understand, again at different times of the day or year. These series paintings became some of his most when it is simply famous works and include views of the Siene River, the Thames River in London, Rouen necessary to love.” Cathedral, oat fields, haystacks and water lilies.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Poststructuralism Understanding Movements in Modern Thought Series Editor: Jack Reynolds
    understanding poststructuralism Understanding Movements in Modern Thought Series Editor: Jack Reynolds Th is series provides short, accessible and lively introductions to the major schools, movements and traditions in philosophy and the history of ideas since the beginning of the Enlightenment. All books in the series are written for undergraduates meeting the subject for the fi rst time. Published Understanding Existentialism Understanding Virtue Ethics Jack Reynolds Stan van Hooft Understanding Poststructuralism James Williams Forthcoming titles include Understanding Empiricism Understanding Hermeneutics Robert Meyers Lawrence Schmidt Understanding Ethics Understanding Naturalism Tim Chappell Jack Ritchie Understanding Feminism Understanding Phenomenology Peta Bowden and Jane Mummery David Cerbone Understanding German Idealism Understanding Rationalism Will Dudley Charlie Heunemann Understanding Hegelianism Understanding Utilitarianism Robert Sinnerbrink Tim Mulgan understanding poststructuralism James Williams For Richard and Olive It is always about who you learn from. © James Williams, 2005 Th is book is copyright under the Berne Convention. No reproduction without permission. All rights reserved. First published in 2005 by Acumen Acumen Publishing Limited 15a Lewins Yard East Street Chesham Bucks HP5 1HQ www.acumenpublishing.co.uk ISBN 1-84465-032-4 (hardcover) ISBN 1-84465-033-2 (paperback) Work on Chapter 3 was supported by British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of Writing
    The Science of Writing Introduction In 1967 the French philosopher, Jacques Derrida, published in book form a collection of texts he had been composing, under the title De la Grammatologie, Of Grammatology.1 The book was translated into English in 1974 by Gayatri Spivak and, with its one-hundred-page translator’s introduction, constituted the first major introduction to Derrida for English-speaking audiences. In 1985 an American professor of English Literature, Gregory Ulmer, published his engagement with Derrida under the title, Applied Grammatology: Post(e) Pedagogy from Jacques Derrida to Joseph Beuys.2 Ulmer’s investigation is one of the very few instances where Derrida’s mention of ‘grammatology’ is taken up at length. In July 2008, at the Derrida Today conference held at the University of Sydney, in Australia, the French Derrida scholar, Catherine Malabou, presented a key note address that probed the fate of Derrida’s notion of ‘grammatology’ and how its question might be re-engaged or re-invented today.3 By ‘grammatology,’ Derrida inferred a ‘science of writing,’ though an approach to the question of writing that radically engages with the question of science, of truth and of knowing. And if Ulmer activates the question posed by grammatology, it is in order to question a scene of teaching the radically questions writing as such. This paper aims at asking if the work of Derrida and Ulmer has continued relevance for a radicalising of the scene of teaching precisely by a critical engagement with what we commonly name as writing and what we commonly understand as its agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Camille on Her Deathbed
    ART AND IMAGES IN PSYCHIATRY SECTION EDITOR: JAMES C. HARRIS, MD Camille on Her Deathbed AMILLE-LEONIE DONCIEUX Monet (1847- Many years after Camille’s passing, Monet spoke with 1879) died at 32 years of age after a pro- his friend Georges Clemenceau, the former French prime tracted illness, most likely metastatic cer- minister, about her death: vical cancer.1 She had been the inspiration and model for her husband, Claude Mo- I found myself staring at the tragic countenance, automatically trying to identify the sequence, the proportion of light and shade Cnet (1840-1926). In 1866, despite his youth, Monet’s in the colors that death had imposed on the immobile face. painting of Camille (Woman in Green Dress) was ac- Shades of blue, yellow, gray...Even before the thought oc- cepted and acclaimed at the annual Paris Salon, the con- curred to memorize the face that meant so much to me, my first servative arbiter of subject matter and style in painting.2 involuntary reflex was to tremble at the shock of the colors. In In the ensuing 12 years, Camille, either alone or with her spite of myself, my reflexes drew me into the unconscious op- son, was the primary model for his paintings. eration that is the daily order of my life. Pity me, my friend.4 Their relationship began when she was just 19 years of age and he was 25. She was said to be attractive and in- These comments were made 40 years after Camille’s telligent with beautiful eyes. During their life together she death.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Thomas Art History Paper Impressionism Through the Eyes Of
    Crystal Thomas Art History Paper Impressionism through the eyes of Edouard Manet and Claude Monet Impressionism is a movement that had a major impact in France during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. There is no exact date for the beginning of this movement. Louis Leroy, an art critic, gave this period its name when he went to an independent exhibition and came across Claude Monet's Sunrise. He said it looked impressionistic, meaning not finished. Impressionists liked to be called Independents. During this time, being called an Impressionist was not a good thing. Impressionistic works were not accepted in the world of art at this time, and art critics were referring to these painters as being lazy. Most of the public did not support Impressionism. People wondered why the artists were not finishing their brush strokes and they did not like the colors being used. Among some of the Impressionist painters are Claude Monet, Edouard Manet, Edgar Degas, Pierre Auguste Renoir, Paul Cezanne, and Camille Pisarro. Characteristics of this movement include noticeable brush strokes that are not blended together, applying the paint in a thick, impasto style, and mixing the colors right on the canvas. Some Impressionists like to take an optical approach to painting and place the hues right next to each other on the canvas. This allows the eyes to do the mixing. Optical color mixing makes paintings look lighter than if the colors were mixed, and gives the paintings the effect of being in motion. Impressionists were interested in painting the everyday world around them.
    [Show full text]
  • A+Guide+In+General+Culture+For+The
    Before starting… a few short definitions What is an artistic movement? Each artistic movement corresponds to a precise historic period. Literature or fine arts more particularly belong to the history in which artists find their inspiration and who themselves influence history. A movement can propose: A new vision of art A new aesthetics A vision of society which is questioned through art An artistic movement is not restricted to a region or a country but it can spread from a continent to the whole world. The borders between movements are often blurred: they follow or oppose each other, sometimes they overlap. An artistic movement can be initiated by one or several artists who can produce a manifesto about it or by a critic, a journalist or a historian who writes a definition which sets it apart from other contemporary works. School or movement? A school is a voluntary gathering of artists and authors who share the same ideas and the same aesthetic project. A movement is an ideological community with a wider geographical range which is established a posteriori, usually by an art critic. What is art? It is difficult to define art. Here are some guidelines for reflection. How does a work become “a work of art?” Are there special criteria? A work reaches the status of “work of art” through a consensus and recognition by the institutions. “The authentic work of art is the one which is recognized as such and for which its creator deserves to be recognized as an artist. Thus, they are both recognized by public opinion which is itself orientated by experts’ judgment, a legitimate instance of legitimation” Pierre Bourdieu wrote.
    [Show full text]
  • By Roland Barthes and "La Carte Postale" by Jacques Derrida
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1995 Re: (Writing) Desire in "Fragments d'Un Discours Amoureux" by Roland Barthes and "La Carte Postale" by Jacques Derrida. Laura Elizabeth Volpe Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Volpe, Laura Elizabeth, "Re: (Writing) Desire in "Fragments d'Un Discours Amoureux" by Roland Barthes and "La Carte Postale" by Jacques Derrida." (1995). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6141. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6141 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master, UMX films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques Derrida's Deconstructive Reading of Rousseau's Essay On
    Philosophy Study, October 2015, Vol. 5, No. 10, 499-512 doi: 10.17265/2159-5313/2015.10.002 D DAVID PUBLISHING Misreading Rousseau? Jacques Derrida’s Deconstructive Reading of Rousseau’s Essay on the Origin of Languages Gerasimos Kakoliris National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Jacques Derrida’s engagement with Jean-Jacques Rousseau in the second part of Of Grammatology constitutes the most systematic, extensive example of deconstructive reading. Nevertheless, the problem of whether Derrida reproduces Rousseau’s basic claims adequately has remained a peripheral concern. This has meant that this may constitute a misreading and the consequences that this would have for the deconstructive operation itself have not adequately examined. Hence, this enquiry into Derrida’s reading of Rousseau centers upon the extent to which Derrida distorts Rousseau’s text in order to be able to confirm deconstruction’s radical theoretical positions. Keywords: Derrida, Rousseau, Deconstructive Reading, Rousseau’s Essay on the Origin of Languages, Derrida’s Of Grammatology 1. Deconstructing the Essay: Rousseau and Language According to Jacques Derrida, the history of metaphysics has always repressed the written sign and conceived language according to the metaphors of self-presence and the voice (what he calls as “metaphysics of presence”). In order to reveal and contest this repression, Derrida dedicated himself, during the 1960’s, to a series of immanent readings of philosophers as Rousseau, Plato, Hegel, Husserl, Levi-Strauss, and others. These readings sought to show that every attempt to subordinate writing to the immediate expressiveness and full-presence of speech always presupposed a prior system of writing which was in conflict with that subordination.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing Noise: Writing In-Between Sound by Mitch Renaud Bachelor
    Tracing Noise: Writing In-Between Sound by Mitch Renaud Bachelor of Music, University of Toronto, 2012 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in the Department of French, the School of Music, and Cultural, Social, and Political Thought Mitch Renaud, 2015 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Tracing Noise: Writing In-Between Sound by Mitch Renaud Bachelor of Music, University of Toronto, 2012 Supervisory Committee Emile Fromet de Rosnay, Department of French and CSPT Supervisor Christopher Butterfield, School of Music Co-Supervisor Stephen Ross, Department of English and CSPT Outside Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Emile Fromet de Rosnay (Department of French and CSPT) Supervisor Christopher Butterfield (School of Music) Co-Supervisor Stephen Ross (Department of English and CSPT) Outside Member Noise is noisy. Its multiple definitions cover one another in such a way as to generate what they seek to describe. My thesis tracks the ways in which noise can be understood historically and theoretically. I begin with the Skandalkonzert that took place in Vienna in 1913. I then extend this historical example into a theoretical reading of the noise of Derrida’s Of Grammatology, arguing that sound and noise are the unheard of his text, and that Derrida’s thought allows us to hear sound studies differently. Writing on sound must listen to the noise of the motion of différance, acknowledge the failings, fading, and flailings of sonic discourse, and so keep in play the aporias that constitute the field of sound itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Grammatology Free
    FREE OF GRAMMATOLOGY PDF Jacques Derrida,Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak,Judith Butler | 560 pages | 19 Feb 2016 | JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9781421419954 | English | Baltimore, MD, United States Grammatology - Wikipedia Goodreads helps you keep track Of Grammatology books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh Of Grammatology try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Preview — Of Grammatology by Jacques Derrida. Of Grammatology by Jacques Derrida. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak Translator. Jacques Derrida's revolutionary theories about deconstruction, phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and structuralism, first voiced in the s, Of Grammatology changed the face of European and American criticism. The ideas in De la grammatologie sparked lively debates in intellectual circles that included students of literature, philosophy, and the humanities, inspiring these students Jacques Derrida's revolutionary theories about deconstruction, phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and structuralism, first voiced in the s, forever changed the face of European and American criticism. The ideas in Of Grammatology la grammatologie sparked lively debates in intellectual circles that included students of literature, philosophy, and the humanities, inspiring these students to ask questions of their disciplines that had previously been Of Grammatology improper. Thirty years later, the immense influence of Of Grammatology work is still igniting controversy, thanks in part to Gayatri Spivak's translation, which captures the richness and complexity of the original. This corrected edition adds a new index of the critics and philosophers cited in the text and makes one of contemporary criticism's most indispensable works even more accessible and usable.
    [Show full text]
  • FRENCH IMPRESSIONISM and JEWISH PATRONAGE Veronica
    LONGING AND BELONGING: FRENCH IMPRESSIONISM AND JEWISH PATRONAGE Veronica Grodzinski Financial Times journalist Rebecca Rose quoted Melanie Clore on the sale of Impressionists at Sotheby’s in London on June 2006: The Impressionist and modern art fi eld is still a growth area and new money is being funneled directly into it. Artists like van Gogh, Monet, Cézanne, Matisse, Degas, Modigliani and Chagall are considered the ‘blue-chip brigade’, which command the highest prices and biggest international interest. Equally, the blue chip brigade is owned, sold and bought by only a handful of the world’s wealthiest buyers and collectors that form an exclusive club of some 20 patrons worldwide.1 Melanie Clore is the [ Jewish, by co-incidence] Deputy Chairman of Sotheby’s Europe Division and the Chairman of the Impressionist and Modern art market worldwide and thus one of the most knowledge- able voices on the subject. Clore’s assessment of twenty Impressionist clients worldwide is most surprising when compared to the number of early Jewish patrons in Republican France and Imperial Germany. What is remarkable is that a small circle of Jewish patrons were vision- aries as far back as a century ago and that the Impressionists circle has not widened since its early patronage around 1900. Why did a ‘small exclusive club’—to use Clore’s terminology—of some twenty-two German Jews collect French avant-garde Art at a time when most European collectors shunned it? Why did a circle of German Jewish patrons “collect against the grain” at a time when the majority of German Jews wanted to assimilate and integrate into majority society? However, their enthusiasm for French Impression- ism resulted in the astonishing fact that of all French modernist art collectors in Wilhelmine Germany, 85% were Germans Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Derrida and Oralcy: Grammatology Revisited Christopher Norris It's Still Difficult to Get Used to the Idea That Derrida's
    Derrida and Oralcy: Grammatology revisited Christopher Norris It’s still difficult to get used to the idea that Derrida’s no longer alive, no longer ‘there’ as a kind of tutelary (sometimes cautionary) presence. This is only the second time I’ve given a talk about him since he died. It’s difficult for all sorts of reasons, partly because he was so much a dominant influence on the intellectual scene, partly because he was so active, productive and intellectually creative right up until the last few months of his life. But also because he wrote so much over the years about questions of presence, the writer’s supposed presence in his or her work, and about questions of absence, including the kind of absence that overtakes a body of written work when the author dies and is no longer present to answer directly for his or her words. This raises the whole question of intentions, of authorial meaning (vouloir- dire), of how far we can or should respect those intentions, and so forth. And of course it also raises crucial issues about the scope and limits of interpretation, issues that we are very much concerned with here. In some of his earliest work, for instance in his 1971 essay on J.L. Austin and speech- act philosophy, Derrida was already saying that one of the peculiar traits of written language was the fact that in some sense it survives, it lives on, it continues to communicate or signify beyond the writer’s lifetime. In a sense this is obvious enough, yet Derrida thought of it as something really quite mysterious and hard to explain, this way that writing manages to convey at least the simulacrum of presence regardless of the author’s absence, whether through death or just not being there to respond to any queries.
    [Show full text]