DOCSLIB.ORG

Southeast Florida Coral Reef Fishery-Independent Baseline Assessment: 2012-2016 Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southeast Florida Coral Reef Fishery-Independent Baseline Assessment: 2012-2016 Summary Report Southeast Florida Coral Reef Fishery-Independent Baseline Assessment: 2012-2016 Summary Report National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coral Reef Conservation Program Southeast Florida Coral Reef Fishery-Independent Baseline Assessment: 2012-2016 Summary Report Prepared By: A. Kirk Kilfoyle1, Brian K. Walker1, Kurtis Gregg2, Dana P. Fisco1, and Richard E. Spieler1 1Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center, 8000 North Ocean Drive, Dania Beach, FL 33004 2ERT, Inc. in support of NOAA-Fisheries Service, Habitat Conservation Division, 400 N. Congress Avenue, Suite 110, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 January 4, 2018 Completed in Fulfillment of Contract NA15OAR4320064 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coral Reef Conservation Program 400 N. Congress Avenue, Suite 120 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 This report should be cited as follows: Kilfoyle, A.K., Walker, B.K., Gregg, K., Fisco, D.P. and R.E. Spieler. 2017. Southeast Florida Coral Reef Fishery-Independent Baseline Assessment: 2012-2016 Summary Report. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 121 p. This project received funding under multiple awards from NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program and The Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or FDEP. Photos: Kirk Kilfoyle; Illustrations: Diane Rome Peebles Executive Summary Reef fishes are an integral component of the southeast Florida coral reef ecosystem that provide as yet unmeasured ecologic and economic benefits to the region. Effective management of coral reef ecosystem components relies on datasets having sufficient spatial and temporal resolution to discern patterns for comparisons now and in the future. Until recently, there was no long-term data collection in place to assess the condition of reef fish resources of the northern Florida Reef Tract (FRT) (northern Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, and Martin counties). An assessment plan for the northern portion of the Florida reef tract was designed through a joint cooperative effort by scientists at the University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science (UM-RSMAS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - Southeast Fisheries Science Center (NOAA - SEFSC), Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center (NSUOC), in consultation with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). This report is a synoptic overview of a five-year dataset that encompasses the collective sampling effort from all partner agencies, and includes survey results from 1,360 sites/Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) sampled during the 2012-2016 time period. The majority of the field work was accomplished through funding provided to NSUOC by the NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program (CRCP) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection – Coral reef Conservation Program (FDEP- CRCP). Significant amounts of data were also collected by multiple Southeast Florida Coral Reef Initiative (SEFCRI) partner agencies that were able to dedicate their time and resources to the project. Field sampling for each year began in May and ran through October. During the five-year study period, >1.2 million individual fish representing 305 species and 70 families were recorded. Total mean density for all sites and strata combined for all five years was 176 fishes/SSU (±4.6 SEM) (Second-Stage Sample Unit = SSU or site, 177 m2). Multivariate analyses showed patterns in the reef fish communities associated with benthic habitats. Water depth, reef type, bottom relief, and location were the primary determinants of reef fish distribution, with differences in assemblages between shallow (≤10 m) and deep (>10m) sites, high and low relief, and between multiple assemblage regions. In addition, the results indicate that regional populations of many commercially and recreationally important species are severely depleted, with large reproductively active adults being the most heavily exploited and in need of greater protection from fishing pressure. The dataset provides opportunities for further mining to examine individual species and reef fish assemblage correlations with a host of abiotic and biotic variables. Thus, from both management and ecological-sciences perspectives, these data are a valuable resource. It is already clear there are significant differences in the geographic distribution of reef fishes at local and regional scales. There are interacting strata and latitudinal differences in total reef fish abundance, species distribution, sizes, and assemblage structure. The combination of data from all five years provides a complete regional fishery-independent baseline. i Acknowledgements The success of this project can be attributed to the cooperative partnerships forged between multiple key agencies, universities, and individuals who have a vested interest in maintaining the health and sustainability of the coral reef ecosystems of southeast Florida. We thank James Bohnsack and Jeremiah Blondeau from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration – National Marine Fisheries Service – Southeast Fisheries Science Center (NOAA-NMFS-SEFSC) and Steven Smith, David Bryan, and Natalia Zurcher from the University of Miami – Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science (UM-RSMAS) for their essential guidance and analytical support throughout this process. By sharing expertise gained through development and refinement of the parent RVC program during its evolution in the Florida Keys and Dry Tortugas, they have strengthened the results of this baseline monitoring effort along the northern Florida Reef Tract. Many well-qualified scientific divers from multiple partner agencies (several of whom also had larger additional roles in this project) lent their time and resources to help make this project a safe, productive, and successful endeavor. Special recognition goes to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) Tequesta Laboratory and associates for their invaluable assistance with sampling the northern-most portion of the survey domain: Erick Ault, Jeff Beal, Anderson Berry, James Brodbeck, Grant Stoecklin, and Jim Whittington; and St. Lucie Inlet Preserve State Park: Ernest Cowen and Charles Jabaly. For assistance in sampling the southernmost portion of the survey domain: Florida Department of Environmental Protection – Coral Reef Conservation Program (FDEP-CRCP): Jennifer Jordan-Báez, Meghan Balling, Karen Bohnsack, Christopher Boykin, Gina Chiello, William Fisher, Melissa Gil, Julio Jimenez, Jamie Monty, Jenna Sansgaard, Melissa Sathe, Mollie Sinnott, Kristina Trotta, Katherine and Ori Tzadik, Joanna Walczak, Lauren Waters, Daron Willison, and Ana Zangroniz; and Miami-Dade County – Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM): James Brown, Kevin Iglesias, Iman Olguin-Lira, Damaso Rosales, Rebecca Ross, Melissa Sathe, Jon Sidner, and Sara Thanner. Additional contributions were made by the Broward County – Natural Resources Planning and Management Division (NRPMD): Kenneth Banks, Courtney Kiel, Pat Quinn, and Angel Rovira; FDEP-West Palm Environmental Resource Permit Program (ERP): Irene Arpayaglou; and Coastal Eco-Group, Inc.: Jenny Stein. Divers from Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center (NSUOC) include: Benjamin Barker, Cameron Baxley, James Brown, Brian Ettinger, Joshua Fredrick, Peter Grasso, Robert Jermain, Lystina Kabay, Morgan Knowles, Adam Nardelli, Keri O‘Neil, Allison Patranella, and Shara Teter. Special thanks to our partners at NOAA-SEFSC (Tom Adam, Jeremiah Blondeau (again), Joseph Contillo, Tara Dolan, James Europe, Jack Javech, Mike Judge, David McClellan, Lindsey Morrison, Benjamin Ruttenberg, and Brian Teare) and from UM- RSMAS (David Bryan, again) for additional training, logistical, and diving assistance. We thank Dana Wusinich-Mendez from NOAA-CRCP for her advice and assistance while navigating through the funding process, and Francisco Pagan from FDEP-CRCP for providing valuable feedback during preparation of this document. ii Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 2. Project Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................... 2 3. Methodology ............................................................................................................... 3 3.1. Study Area and Design ......................................................................................... 3 3.2. Data Collection ..................................................................................................... 7 3.3. Data Entry and Quality Control ........................................................................... 9 3.4. Data Analysis ..................................................................................................... 10 4. Results and Discussion ............................................................................................. 14 4.1. Fish Assemblage ................................................................................................ 14 4.1.1. Fish Density and Species Richness ............................................................. 14 4.1.2. Fish Community Regional Habitat Associations ........................................ 16 4.1.3. Exploited Species .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School November 2017 Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E. Hepner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hepner, Megan E., "Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7408 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary by Megan E. Hepner A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Marine Science with a concentration in Marine Resource Assessment College of Marine Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Frank Muller-Karger, Ph.D. Christopher Stallings, Ph.D. Steve Gittings, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 31st, 2017 Keywords: Species richness, biodiversity, functional diversity, species traits Copyright © 2017, Megan E. Hepner ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my major advisor, Dr. Frank Muller-Karger, who provided opportunities for me to strengthen my skills as a researcher on research cruises, dive surveys, and in the laboratory, and as a communicator through oral and presentations at conferences, and for encouraging my participation as a full team member in various meetings of the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and other science meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Status of the Recreational Fishery for Ulua in Hawai‘I, and Recommendations for Future Management
    Department of Land and Natural Resources Division of Aquatic Resources Technical Report 20-02 Evaluation of the status of the recreational fishery for ulua in Hawai‘i, and recommendations for future management October 2000 Benjamin J. Cayetano Governor DIVISION OF AQUATIC RESOURCES Department of Land and Natural Resources 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 330 Honolulu, HI 96813 November 2000 Cover photo by Kit Hinhumpetch Evaluation of the status of the recreational fishery for ulua in Hawai‘i, and recommendations for future management DAR Technical Report 20-02 “Ka ulua kapapa o ke kai loa” The ulua fish is a strong warrior. Hawaiian proverb “Kayden, once you get da taste fo’ ulua fishing’, you no can tink of anyting else!” From Ulua: The Musical, by Lee Cataluna Rick Gaffney and Associates, Inc. 73-1062 Ahikawa Street Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Phone: (808) 325-5000 Fax: (808) 325-7023 Email: [email protected] 3 4 Contents Introduction . 1 Background . 2 The ulua in Hawaiian culture . 2 Coastal fishery history since 1900 . 5 Ulua landings . 6 The ulua sportfishery in Hawai‘i . 6 Biology . 8 White ulua . 9 Other ulua . 9 Bluefin trevally movement study . 12 Economics . 12 Management options . 14 Overview . 14 Harvest refugia . 15 Essential fish habitat approach . 27 Community based management . 28 Recommendations . 29 Appendix . .32 Bibliography . .33 5 5 6 Introduction Unique marine resources, like Hawai‘i’s ulua/papio, have cultural, scientific, ecological, aes- thetic and functional values that are not generally expressed in commercial catch statistics and/or the market place. Where their populations have not been depleted, the various ulua pop- ular in Hawai‘i’s fisheries are often quite abundant and are thought to play the role of a signifi- cant predator in the ecology of nearshore marine ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Assemblage of the Mamanguape Environmental Protection Area, NE Brazil: Abundance, Composition and Microhabitat Availability Along the Mangrove-Reef Gradient
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 10(1): 109-122, 2012 Copyright © 2012 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Fish assemblage of the Mamanguape Environmental Protection Area, NE Brazil: abundance, composition and microhabitat availability along the mangrove-reef gradient Josias Henrique de Amorim Xavier1, Cesar Augusto Marcelino Mendes Cordeiro2, Gabrielle Dantas Tenório1, Aline de Farias Diniz1, Eugenio Pacelli Nunes Paulo Júnior1, Ricardo S. Rosa1 and Ierecê Lucena Rosa1 Reefs, mangroves and seagrass biotopes often occur in close association, forming a complex and highly productive ecosystem that provide significant ecologic and economic goods and services. Different anthropogenic disturbances are increasingly affecting these tropical coastal habitats leading to growing conservation concern. In this field-based study, we used a visual census technique (belt transects 50 m x 2 m) to investigate the interactions between fishes and microhabitats at the Mamanguape Mangrove-Reef system, NE Brazil. Overall, 144 belt transects were performed from October 2007 to September 2008 to assess the structure of the fish assemblage. Fish trophic groups and life stage (juveniles and adults) were recorded according to literature, the percent cover of the substrate was estimated using the point contact method. Our results revealed that fish composition gradually changed from the Estuarine to the Reef zone, and that fish assemblage was strongly related to the microhabitat availability, as suggested by the predominance of carnivores at the Estuarine zone and presence of herbivores at the Reef zone. Fish abundance and diversity were higher in the Reef zone and estuary margins, highlighting the importance of structural complexity. A pattern of nursery area utilization, with larger specimens at the Transition and Reef Zone and smaller individuals at the Estuarine zone, was recorded for Abudefduf saxatilis, Anisotremus surinamensis, Lutjanus alexandrei, and Lutjanus jocu.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume
    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Epinephelus Drummondhayi Goode and Bean, 1878 EED Frequent Synonyms / Misidentifications: None / None
    click for previous page 1340 Bony Fishes Epinephelus drummondhayi Goode and Bean, 1878 EED Frequent synonyms / misidentifications: None / None. FAO names: En - Speckled hind; Fr - Mérou grivelé; Sp - Mero pintaroja. Diagnostic characters: Body depth subequal to head length, 2.4 to 2.6 times in standard length (for fish 20 to 43 cm standard length). Nostrils subequal; preopercle rounded, evenly serrate. Gill rakers on first arch 9 or 10 on upper limb, 17 or 18 on lower limb, total 26 to 28. Dorsal fin with 11 spines and 15 or 16 soft rays, the membrane incised between the anterior spines; anal fin with 3 spines and 9 soft rays; caudal fin trun- cate or slightly emarginate, the corners acute; pectoral-fin rays 18. Scales strongly ctenoid, about 125 lateral-scale series; lateral-line scales 72 to 76. Colour: adults (larger than 33 cm) dark reddish brown, densely covered with small pearly white spots; juveniles (less than 20 cm) bright yellow, covered with small bluish white spots. Size: Maximum about 110 cm; maximum weight 30 kg. Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Adults inhabit offshore rocky bottoms in depths of 25 to 183 m but are most common between 60 and 120 m.Females mature at 4 or 5 years of age (total length 45 to 60 cm).Spawning oc- curs from July to September, and a large female may produce up to 2 million eggs at 1 spawning. Back-calculated total lengths for fish aged 1 to 15 years are 19, 32, 41, 48, 53, 57, 61, 65, 68, 71, 74, 77, 81, 84, and 86 cm; the maximum age attained is at least 25 years, and the largest specimen measured was 110 cm.
    [Show full text]
  • (<I>Anisotremus Virginicus,</I> Haemulidae) And
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 34(1): 21-59,1984 DESCRIPTION OF PORKFISH LARVAE (ANISOTREMUS VIRGINICUS, HAEMULIDAE) AND THEIR OSTEOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT Thomas Potthoff, Sharon Kelley, Martin Moe and Forrest Young ABSTRACT Wild-caught adult porkfish (Anisotremus virginicus, Haemulidae) were spawned in the laboratory and their larvae reared. A series of 35 larvae 2.4 mm NL to 21.5 mm SL from 2 to 30 days old or older (larvae of unknown age) was studied for pigmentation characteristics. Cleared and stained specimens were examined for meristic and osteological development. Cartilaginous neural and haemal arches develop first anteriorly, at the center, and posteriorly, above and below the notochord, but ossification of the vertebral column is from anterior in a posterior direction. Epipleural rib pairs develop from bone, but pleural rib pairs develop from cartilage first and then ossify. The second dorsal, anal and caudal fins develop rays first and simultaneously, followed by first dorsal fin spine development. The pectoral and pelvic fins are the last of all fins to develop rays. All bones basic to a perciform pectoral girdle develop with cartilaginous radials present between the pectoral fin ray bases. Development and structure of pre dorsal bones and dorsal and anal fin pterygiophores were studied. All bones basic to a perciform caudal complex developed and no fusion of any of these bones was observed in the adults. Radial cartilages developed ventrad in the hypural complex. The hyoid arches originated from cartilage but the branchiostegal rays formed from bone. The development and anatomy of the branchial skeleton were studied. Spines develop on the four bones of the opercular series in larvae and juveniles but are absent in the adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Type Species, Perca Rogaa Forsskål, 1775, by Original Designation and Monotypy; Proposed As a Subgenus
    click for previous page 16 FAO Species Catalogue Vol. 16 2.4 Information by genus and species Aethaloperca Fowler, 1904 SERRAN Aethal Aethafoperca Fowler, 1904:522; type species, Perca rogaa Forsskål, 1775, by original designation and monotypy; proposed as a subgenus. Synonyms: None. Species: A single species widely distributed in the Red Sea and Indo-West Pacific region. Remarks: The genus Aethaloperca is closely related to Cephalopholis and Gracila which also have IX dorsal-fin spines and several trisegmental pterygiophores in the dorsal and anal fin. Smith-Vaniz et al. (1988) discussed the relationships of these genera, and we agree with their decision to recognize Aethaloperca as a valid genus. It differs from Cephalopholis and Gracila in the configuration of the pectoral and median fins and in some cranial features (the anteriorly converging parietal crests and the well-developed median crest on the frontals that extends to the rear edge of the ethmoidal depression). Aethaloperca also differs from Gracila in the shape of the maxilla and in having a larger head and deeper body. Aethaloperca rogaa (Forsskål, 1775) Fig. 35; PI. IA SERRAN Aethal 1 Perca rogaa Forsskål, 1775:38 (type locality: Red Sea, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia). Synonyms: Perca lunaris Forsskål; 1775:39 (type locality: Al Hudaydah [Yemen] and Jeddah). Cephalo- pholis rogaa . FAO Names: En - Redmouth grouper; Fr - Vielle roga; Sp - Cherna roga. Fig. 35 Aethaloperca rogaa (4.50 mm total length) Diagnosis: Body deep and compressed, the depth greater than the head length and contained 2.1 to 2.4 times in standard length, the body width contained 2.3 to 2.8 times in the depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Assemblages Associated with Red Grouper Pits at Pulley Ridge, A
    419 Abstract—Red grouper (Epineph- elus morio) modify their habitat by Fish assemblages associated with red grouper excavating sediment to expose rocky pits, providing structurally complex pits at Pulley Ridge, a mesophotic reef in the habitat for many fish species. Sur- Gulf of Mexico veys conducted with remotely op- erated vehicles from 2012 through 2015 were used to characterize fish Stacey L. Harter (contact author)1 assemblages associated with grouper Heather Moe1 pits at Pulley Ridge, a mesophotic 2 coral ecosystem and habitat area John K. Reed of particular concern in the Gulf Andrew W. David1 of Mexico, and to examine whether invasive species of lionfish (Pterois Email address for contact author: [email protected] spp.) have had an effect on these as- semblages. Overall, 208 grouper pits 1 Southeast Fisheries Science Center were examined, and 66 fish species National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA were associated with them. Fish as- 3500 Delwood Beach Road semblages were compared by using Panama City, Florida 32408 several factors but were considered 2 Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute to be significantly different only on Florida Atlantic University the basis of the presence or absence 5600 U.S. 1 North of predator species in their pit (no Fort Pierce, Florida 34946 predators, lionfish only, red grou- per only, or both lionfish and red grouper). The data do not indicate a negative effect from lionfish. Abun- dances of most species were higher in grouper pits that had lionfish, and species diversity was higher in grouper pits with a predator (lion- The red grouper (Epinephelus morio) waters (>70 m) of the shelf edge and fish, red grouper, or both).
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkcam Fishes
    SharkCam Fishes A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower By Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie 1 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index Trevor Mendelow, designer of SharkCam, on August 31, 2014, the day of the original SharkCam installation. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition by Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. For questions related to this guide or its usage contact Erin Burge. The suggested citation for this guide is: Burge EJ, CE O’Brien and jon-newbie. 2020. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition. Los Angeles: Explore.org Ocean Frontiers. 201 pp. Available online http://explore.org/live-cams/player/shark-cam. Guide version 5.0. 24 February 2020. 2 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index TABLE OF CONTENTS SILVERY FISHES (23) ........................... 47 African Pompano ......................................... 48 FOREWORD AND INTRODUCTION .............. 6 Crevalle Jack ................................................. 49 IDENTIFICATION IMAGES ...................... 10 Permit .......................................................... 50 Sharks and Rays ........................................ 10 Almaco Jack ................................................. 51 Illustrations of SharkCam
    [Show full text]
  • Potential of Pigeon Creek As a Nursery Habitat for Juvenile Reef Fish
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Potential of Pigeon Creek, San Salvador, Bahamas, As Nursery Habitat for Juvenile Reef Fish Ian C. Conboy1 Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woods Hole, MA James M. Haynes The College at Brockport, State University of New York, Brockport, NY ABSTRACT This project assessed the significance of Pigeon Creek, San Salvador, Bahamas as a nursery habitat for coral reef fishes. Pigeon Creek’s perimeter is lined with mangrove and limestone bedrock. The bottom is sand or sea grass and ranges in depth from exposed at low tide to a 3-m deep, tide-scoured channel. In June 2006 and January 2007, fish were counted and their maturity was recorded while sampling 112 of 309 possible 50-m transects along the perimeter of the Pigeon Creek. Excluding silversides (Atherinidae, 52% of fish counted), six families each comprised more than 1% of the total abundance (Scaridae/parrotfishes, 35.3%; Lutjanidae/snappers, 23.9%; Haemulidae/grunts, 21.0%; Gerreidae/mojarras, 8.5%; Pomacentridae/damselfishes, 6.1%; Labridae/wrasses, 2.4%). There were few differences in effort-adjusted counts among habitats (mangrove, bedrock, mixed), sections (north, middle, southwest) and seasons (summer 2006 and winter 2007). Red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle), covering 68% of the perimeter was where 62% of the fish were counted. Snappers, grunts and parrot fishes are important food fishes and significant families in terms of reef ecology around San Salvador. Mangrove was the most important habitat for snappers and grunts; bedrock was most important for parrot fishes. The southwest section was important for snappers, grunts and parrot fishes, the north section for grunts and parrot fishes, and the middle section for snappers.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Guilds Among Artificial-Reef Fishes in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Brian D
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aquila Digital Community Gulf of Mexico Science Volume 14 Article 3 Number 2 Number 2 1996 Feeding Guilds Among Artificial-Reef Fishes in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Brian D. Nelson University of West Florida Stephen A. Bortone University of West Florida DOI: 10.18785/goms.1402.03 Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/goms Recommended Citation Nelson, B. D. and S. A. Bortone. 1996. Feeding Guilds Among Artificial-Reef Fishes in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Gulf of Mexico Science 14 (2). Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/goms/vol14/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf of Mexico Science by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nelson and Bortone: Feeding Guilds Among Artificial-Reef Fishes in the Northern Gulf Gulf of Mexico Scimce, 1996(2), pp. 66-80 Feeding Guilds Among Artificial-Reef Fishes in the Northern Gulf of Mexico BRIAN D. NELSON AND STEPHEN A. BORTONE To examine the diets of 25 demersal artificial-reef-associated fish species, 540 fishes were collected with spears and hand-nets off Panama City, Florida, in the summer of 1993. Fishes were preserved whole in the field. Stomach contents were later analyzed by frequency of occurrence, numerical abundance, and percent volume. These measures were combined into an Index of Relative Importance (IRI).
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Demographic Parameter Synthesis for Exploited Florida and Caribbean Coral Reef Fishes
    Please do not remove this page Life history demographic parameter synthesis for exploited Florida and Caribbean coral reef fishes Stevens, Molly H; Smith, Steven Glen; Ault, Jerald Stephen https://scholarship.miami.edu/discovery/delivery/01UOML_INST:ResearchRepository/12378179400002976?l#13378179390002976 Stevens, M. H., Smith, S. G., & Ault, J. S. (2019). Life history demographic parameter synthesis for exploited Florida and Caribbean coral reef fishes. Fish and Fisheries (Oxford, England), 20(6), 1196–1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12405 Published Version: https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12405 Downloaded On 2021/09/28 21:22:59 -0400 Please do not remove this page Received: 11 April 2019 | Revised: 31 July 2019 | Accepted: 14 August 2019 DOI: 10.1111/faf.12405 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Life history demographic parameter synthesis for exploited Florida and Caribbean coral reef fishes Molly H. Stevens | Steven G. Smith | Jerald S. Ault Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Abstract Miami, FL, USA Age‐ or length‐structured stock assessments require reliable life history demo‐ Correspondence graphic parameters (growth, mortality, reproduction) to model population dynamics, Molly H. Stevens, Rosenstiel School of potential yields and stock sustainability. This study synthesized life history informa‐ Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, tion for 84 commercially exploited tropical reef fish species from Florida and the Miami, FL 33149, USA. U.S. Caribbean (Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands). We attempted to identify a Email: [email protected] useable set of life history parameters for each species that included lifespan, length Funding information at age, weight at length and maturity at length.
    [Show full text]