DOCSLIB.ORG

Outline of the Book of Joshua

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Outline of the Book of Joshua Outline of the Book of Joshua “ow therefore fear Jehovah, and serve him in sincerity and in truth... choose you this day whom ye will serve... as for me and my house, we will serve Jehovah” Joshua 24:14-15 Joshua Moses was 120 years old when he died in the plains of Moab (Deut. 34:5-6). Because of Moses’ sin against the Lord at Kadesh (Numb. 20:12) he was not aloud to enter Canaan. The Lord chose Joshua to lead Israel into the land of Canaan (Numb. 27:16-23; Deut. 31:23). Joshua is a man of great courage. He was one of the twelve rulers sent by Moses to spy out the land of Canaan (Numb. 13:2). It was Joshua and Caleb who brought back a good report of Canaan (Numb. 14:7-9). Joshua is mentioned several times as being at Moses’ side. He waited at Sinai for Moses to come down from receiving the Law and in doing so did not involve himself in the sins of Idolatry. Joshua’s courage had as its foundation great faith in God. Joshua, “ Left nothing undone ” of God’s commands regarding taking Canaan (see Josh. 11:14-15). Date of Joshua The book of Joshua falls under the sixth heading of OT History called “The Period of Conquest.” The previous five periods are known as antediluvian, postdiluvian, patriarchal, bondage, and period of wandering. The date of the book seems to vary from author to author. F. C. Cook dates the book 1450-1425 BC. “Josephus states that Joshua’s rule after the death of Moses lasted for 25 years, and that he had previously been 40 years associated with him. This would fix Joshua’s age at the time of the Exodus at 45” (Barnes Notes, pg. 347; F. C. Cook).). Joshua died when he was 110 (Josh. 24:29); therefore if we follow Josephus’ word, Joshua was 85 years old at the death of Moses. We know that Caleb was 40 years old when he spied out Canaan (Josh. 14:7). The wilderness wanderings lasted approximately 38 years. Therefore Caleb was 78 years old at the time Israel crossed the Jordan to conquer Canaan. Caleb is said to be 85 years old and the conquest is over at Joshua 14:10. If we subtract his age upon entering Canaan from his current age in Josh. 14:10 we get 7 years which is the approximate time of the conquest in which Caleb refers to as “ a long time ” (Josh. 11:18). The purpose of the book of Joshua Joshua records the fulfillment of God’s promise to give Israel a land for their possession. Joshua writes, “ So Jehovah gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein ” (Josh. 21:43). This primary objective of the book is detailed so that we learn three basic lessons. First, we learn that God’s promises are conditioned upon man’s obedience. The battle of Jericho is a prime example. God told Joshua that He was giving Jericho to Israel. Israel; however, would have to follow God’s instructions in order to receive the gift (see Josh. 6:2). Those instructions included a blood bath of battle wherein all life that had breath in its nostrils was to be killed (see Deut. 20:16-18; Josh. 6:21). Grace operates no different today. Man receives God’s gracious gift of eternal life today in the same manner of obedience that Israel did during the days of conquest (see Eph. 2:8; 1:7; Acts 2:38). The second lesson we gain from the book of Joshua is that of perfect obedience . The book of Joshua sets out to explain man’s responsibility to perfectly obey the laws of God (see Josh. 1:7-8; 23:1-6). To disobey the laws of God was to trespass in areas where God had not authorized man to go (Josh. 6:17-19; 7:10-13). Practices that were lawfully “banned” were to be viewed by God’s people as detestable (see Deut. 7:26). God continues to demand man’s lawful perfection (Matt. 5:48; Gal. 5:19ff; I Pet. 1:14 etc.). Those who truly love Jesus will perform his will with a spirit of gladness in their heart. Those who do not live a life of lawful perfection sin (Rom. 4:15; 6:1-2; I Jn. 3:4). Christians today ought to develop a passionate hatred for sin as God developed in the hearts of those who loved Him of old (see Rom. 12:9). 1 The third and final lesson in the book of Joshua is that of fear . God commanded Israel to have no fear of man (Josh. 1:9; 10:8, 25). Israel was to make a proper distinction between deity and flesh. When a man fears the enemies of the cross he makes it evident that he is destined for perdition (see Phil. 1:28). When a man fears the wicked of the world he is not being guided by the Spirit of God but rather by his own emotions and will (see II Tim. 1:7-8). No matter how fierce (Matt. 10:24-31) the wicked may be let not the Christian fear the enemies of the cross (Phil. 3:17-18). Our fear ought to be directed at God alone (see Deut. 5:29; 6:1ff; I Pet. 2:17). The apostle Paul said, “ If God is for us, who can be against us ?” (Rom. 8:31). The author of Hebrews states that “The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me ” (Heb. 13:6). Though sinful man may take the physical life of a Christian they can do nothing to the eternal soul of man. Jesus said, “ And be not afraid of them that kill the body , but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell ” (Matt. 10:28). Let the faithful and convicted child of God fear no man yet rather stand boldly (Rom. 1:16; Eph. 6:10ff) in the great battle for the souls of man (see II Cor. 10:1-7). 2 Chapter 1 I. Jehovah’s charge to Joshua (1:1-9): A. “ow it came to pass after the death of Moses the servant of Jehovah, that Jehovah spake unto Joshua the son of un, Moses’ minister, saying, Moses my servant is dead; now therefore arise, go over this Jordan, thou, and all this people, unto the land which I do give to them, even to the children of Israel ” (1:1-2). 1. God’s promise to Israel had not changed simply because Moses died (Gen. 12:1ff; Deut. 34:4). 2. The Lord speaks to Joshua and commands him to take Israel over the Jordan into Canaan that they may receive God’s land promise. B. “Every place that the soul of your foot shall tread upon, to you have I given it as I spake unto Moses. From the wilderness, and this Lebanon, even unto the great river, the river Euphrates, all the land of the Hittites, and unto the great sea toward the going down of the sun, shall be your border ” (1:3-4). 1. Jehovah gives a broad outline of the land of promise. The width of the land would be from the Mediterranean Sea westward to the Euphrates River. 2. The Lord instills confidence in Joshua by saying, “every place that the soul of your foot shall tread upon to you have I given it as I spoke to Moses .” God’s gift of Canaan was theirs to have! C. “There shall not any man be able to stand before thee all the days of thy life: as I was with Moses, so I will be with thee; I will not fail thee, nor forsake thee. Be strong and of good courage, for thou shalt cause this people to inherit the land which I sware unto their fathers to give them ” (1:5-6). 1. The Lord explains to Joshua the power that is behind him as he crosses over the Jordan with the people of Israel. There will be no man that can stand in war successfully against Israel. The Lord promises Joshua saying, “ I will be with thee; I will not fail thee, nor forsake thee .” God’s promises remain today (i.e., the forgiveness of our sins / see Gal. 3:14; Eph. 1:7; Acts 2:38). No man or force on this earth may take God’s promises away from us (Rom. 8:31ff). God will never fail or forsake us (Heb. 13:5). 2. Seeing the confidence that God instills within His people the Lord charges Joshua to “ be strong and of good courage .” Christians today may gain good courage and strength through the knowledge of God’s promises. Seeing that we shall be forgiven of our sins and have an eternal heavenly home we are courageous to stand against every foe that rejects the teachings of Christ. D. “Only be strong and very courageous, to observe to do according to all the law, which Moses my servant commanded thee: turn not from it to the right hand or to the left, that thou mayest have good success whithersoever thou goest ” (1:7). 1. Three times the Lord commands Joshua to “ be strong and courageous ” from Joshua 1:6-9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Book of First Samuel Chapter 1
    Book of First Samuel Chapter 1 First Samuel in the flow of Old Testament history: • Judges & Ruth – no king • 1 Samuel – man’s king (Saul) • 2 Samuel – God’s king (David) First Samuel is a book of transition: • From a time of judges to a time of kings • From a theocracy to a monarchy • Samuel was God’s bridge-builder . He was the last of the judges and the first of the prophets. He became the bridge to the kings of Israel by anointing the first two kings, Saul and David. Samuel gave spiritual leadership to the people at a critical time. The Bible describes those times in Judges 21:25 In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes. There was no king, but God raised up a prophet who called the nation back to God. Samuel was a man who stood in the gap. A. T. Pierson once said: “History is His story .” God is ultimately in control of history, but God uses people to change the course of history, and in this case He used Samuel. First Samuel traces the lives of three important leaders: • Samuel (chapters 1-7) • Saul (chapters 8-15) • David (chapters 16-31) 1. Hannah’s Problems (1:1-8) A. She had a domestic problem . She lived in a divided home because she had a rival woman to contend with. She had to share her husband with another woman. B. She had a physical problem . She was barren. Elkanah’s other wife had children, but she had none.
    [Show full text]
  • Can You Answer These Questions?
    SERIES XV LECTURE IX c"qa CAN YOU ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS? 1. Describe the events that occurred immediately after the death of Joshua and the elders. 2. Describe the three ways in which the people of Israel were punished during the period of the Judges. 3. Describe five aspects which were common to both the Judges and the Kings of Israel. 4. Describe five aspects which distinguished the Judges from the Kings of Israel. 5. Who was the first of the Judges? This and much more will be addressed in the ninth lecture of this series: "The Period of the Judges: Part One". To derive maximum benefit from this lecture, keep these questions in mind as you listen to the lecture and read through the outline. Go back to these questions once again at the end of the lecture and see how well you answer them. PLEASE NOTE: This outline and source book were designed as a powerful tool to help you appreciate and understand the basis of Jewish History. Although the lectures can be listened to without the use of the outline, we advise you to read the outline to enhance your comprehension. Use it, as well, as a handy reference guide and for quick review. This lecture is dedicated to the honor and merit of Dr. and Mrs. Gabriel Sosne and their family. THE EPIC OF THE ETERNAL PEOPLE Presented by Rabbi Shmuel Irons Series XV Lecture #9 THE PERIOD OF THE JUDGES: PART ONE I. The Emergence of the Judges A. lM¨ z`¥ E`x¨ xW¤ `£ r© EWFdi§ ix¥g£`© min¦ i¨ Ekix¦`¡d¤ xW¤ `£ mip¦ w¥ G§d© in¥ i§ | loke§ r© Wª Fdi§ in¥ i§ loM 'c z`¤ mr¨ d¨ Eca§ r© I©e© FzF` ExA§ w§ I¦e© :mip¦
    [Show full text]
  • Manasseh: Reflections on Tribe, Territory and Text
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Vanderbilt Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive MANASSEH: REFLECTIONS ON TRIBE, TERRITORY AND TEXT By Ellen Renee Lerner Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Religion August, 2014 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor Douglas A. Knight Professor Jack M. Sasson Professor Annalisa Azzoni Professor Herbert Marbury Professor Tom D. Dillehay Copyright © 2014 by Ellen Renee Lerner All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people I would like to thank for their role in helping me complete this project. First and foremost I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the members of my dissertation committee: Professor Douglas A. Knight, Professor Jack M. Sasson, Professor Annalisa Azzoni, Professor Herbert Marbury, and Professor Tom Dillehay. It has been a true privilege to work with them and I hope to one day emulate their erudition and the kind, generous manner in which they support their students. I would especially like to thank Douglas Knight for his mentorship, encouragement and humor throughout this dissertation and my time at Vanderbilt, and Annalisa Azzoni for her incredible, fabulous kindness and for being a sounding board for so many things. I have been lucky to have had a number of smart, thoughtful colleagues in Vanderbilt’s greater Graduate Dept. of Religion but I must give an extra special thanks to Linzie Treadway and Daniel Fisher -- two people whose friendship and wit means more to me than they know.
    [Show full text]
  • Buy Cheap Levitra
    Excavating a Battle: The Intersection of Textual Criticism, Archaeology, and Geography The Problem of Hill City Just as similarities or variant forms of personal names can create textual problems, the same .( ֶּ֖ג ַבע) and Geba (גִּבְע ָ֔ ה) is true of geographic names. A case in point is the confusion of Gibeah Both names mean “Hill City”, an appropriate name for a city in the hill country of Benjamin, where other cities are named Lookout (Mizpeh) and Height (Ramah). Adding to the mix is the The situation is clarified (or confused further) by the modifiers that .( ִּג ְב ֥עֹון) related name Gibeon are sometimes added to the names. The difficulty of keeping these cities distinct is increased by textual problems. Sometimes “Geba” may be used for “Gibeah,” and vice versa. To complicate matters further there are other Gibeah/Geba’s in Israel (Joshua 15:57—Gibeah in Judah, Joshua 24:33 —Gibeath in Ephraim). That Gibeah and Geba in Benjamin are two different places is demonstrated by Joshua 18:24, 28, which lists ( ִּג ְב ַַ֣עת and Gibeah (here in the form ( ֶּ֖ג ַבע) both Geba among the cities of Benjamin. Isaiah 10:29 also The Gibeah we are discussing here is near .( ִּג ְב ַ֥עת ש ֶּ֖אּול) distinguishes Geba from Gibeah of Saul the central ridge, near Ramah, north of Jerusalem. Geba is further east on the edge of the wilderness, near a descent to the Jordan Valley. It is across the valley from Michmash. Gibeah Gibeah is Saul’s capital near Ramah. It is a restoration of the Gibeah destroyed in Judges.
    [Show full text]
  • VAYISHLACH (And He Sent)
    VAYISHLACH (And He Sent) GENESIS (B‟RESHIYT 32:3 – 36:43) INTRODUCTION: 1. Jacob‟s flight from Esau now comes full circle. a. He had left to flee Esau‟s anger and vengeful plan to kill him. b. As Jacob approached Canaan, Esau approached him with a 400 man army. c. However, Isaac was still alive at this time. “And Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing wherewith his father blessed him: and Esau said in his heart, „The days of mourning for my father are at hand; then will I slay my brother Jacob.” – Genesis 27:41 2. It seems inevitable that Jacob was going to have to confront Esau in order to enter land. a. Prophetically: Israel under Moses/Joshua had to confront Esau as well as giants. b. To possess the Land (fulfill purpose) requires confronting the obstacles. 3. Also see how and when Jacob became Israel. a. From “hand on heel” to “prince of God.” 4. Some rabbinic writers consider this even to have been a prophetic vision. a. Many see it as symbolic – each person has to struggle with God to become whole. b. In face of crisis, Jacob was left alone with God. 5. Yet, in the haftarah it says: “In the womb he took his brother by the heel [literally occurred], and in his manhood he strove with God. He strove with the angel and prevailed; he wept and sought his favor. He met God at Bethel [literally occurred], and there God spoke with us.” – Hosea 12:3-4 6. Jacob had struggled with men and overcome through persistency, morality and wit.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Doctrine of Ishmael 1. Ishmael Was the Firstborn Son of Abraham By
    Doctrine of Ishmael 1. Ishmael was the firstborn son of Abraham by Hagar, an Egyptian maid of his wife Sarah. Abraham was 86 at the time and had lived in Canaan for 11 years. 2. Sarah, the barren wife, in keeping with customs of her times as seen in the Babylonian law code of Hammurabi, gave her slave Hagar to Abraham to produce an heir for the family. 3. When Abraham was 99 God renewed His covenant with him and enjoined circumcision of Ishmael as a sign of his membership in the covenant community. 4. God also announced that He would fulfill the divine promise through his wife Sarah, although Abraham looked on Ishmael with deep affection and prayed that he might be the promised heir (Gen 17:18). Gen 17:18 And Abraham said unto God, O that Ishmael might live before thee! Gen 17:19 And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him. 5. When Ishmael was circumcised, Abraham and his household (those born to the men and women who had grown up in his employ and newcomers to the household through purchase from foreigners) were also circumcised. 5.1 Ishmael was 13 years old at the time of his circumcision. Many Arab tribes still circumcise their youths at the age of 13. 6. Fourteen years after the birth of Ishmael, Isaac was born to Sarah and Abraham. The jealousy that had long separated Sarah from Hagar came to a breaking point at the time of the weaning of Isaac.
    [Show full text]
  • Resurrection Or Miraculous Cures? the Elijah and Elisha Narrative Against Its Ancient Near Eastern Background
    Bar, “Resurrection or Miraculous Cures?” OTE 24/1 (2011): 9-18 9 Resurrection or Miraculous Cures? The Elijah and Elisha Narrative Against its Ancient Near Eastern Background SHAUL BAR (UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS) ABSTRACT The Elijah and Elisha cycles have similar stories where the prophet brings a dead child back to life. In addition, in the Elisha story, a corpse is thrown into the prophet’s grave; when it comes into con- tact with one of his bones, the man returns to life. Thus the question is do these stories allude to resurrection, or “only” miraculous cures? What was the purpose of the inclusion of these stories and what message did they convey? In this paper we will show that these are legends that were intended to lend greater credence to prophetic activity and to indicate the Lord’s power over death. A INTRODUCTION There is consensus among scholars that Dan 12:2-3, which they assign to the 1 second century B.C.E., refers to the resurrection of the dead. The question be- comes whether biblical texts earlier than this era allude to this doctrine. The phrase “resurrection of the dead” never appears in the Bible. Scholars searching for biblical allusions to resurrection have cited various idioms.2 They list verbs including “arise,”3 “wake up,”4 and “live,”5 all of which can denote a return to life. We also find “take,”6 which refers to being taken to Heaven, the noun “life,”7 and “see.”8 In the present paper however, we shall examine the stories of the Elijah and Elisha cycles which include similar tales in which the prophet brings a dead child back to life: in Elijah’s case, the son of the widow of Zare- phath (1 Kgs 17:17-24); in Elisha’s, the son of the Shunammite matron (2 Kgs 4:31-37).
    [Show full text]
  • Torat Ha-Elohim
    .-','> niinn isd THE PENTATEUCH. D^nSN^ min n^ti^Ki:: 15d japn 'nxD njin THE LAW OF GOD. VOLUME FIRST, CONTAINING THE BOOK OF GENESIS. EDITED, AND WITH FORMER TRANSLATIONS DILIGENTLY COMPARED AND REVISED, BY ISAAC LEESER. PHILADELPHIA: PRINTED BY C. SHERMAN, FOR THE EDITOR, 5605. Entered, according to the Act of Congress, in Ihe year 1845, Bv Isaac Leeser, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. ; PREFACE. In presenting this edition of the Pentateuch to the Jewish public, it is not my intention to make a long preface, respecting the motives which induced me to undertake so great and difficult a task. It has always appeared to me that such a labour ought to be accomplished in this country, and I could not resist the incli- nation to commence it, under the hope that divine blessing would not be withheld in the accomplishment of the voluntarily assumed task. But with all this it cost me many anxious thoughts before I finally resolved on commencing a work which, having been announced full seven years ago, had notwithstanding its great importance, attracted so little attention, that the aid promised would not pay one-third of the necessary outlay. Still I con- ceived that the project might not for this reason prove a failure and thus the first volume is with this presented to my Jewish friends. I speak of my Jewish friends in particular, for however much a revised translation may be desired by all believers in the Word of God, there is no probability that the gentiles will en- courage any publication of this nature, emanating from a Jewish writer.
    [Show full text]
  • Invitation to Judaism – Lesson Plan – God/Torah/Mitzvot Rabbi Steven Morgen, Congregation Beth Yeshurun Reading: Robinson, Pp
    Invitation to Judaism – Lesson Plan – God/Torah/Mitzvot Rabbi Steven Morgen, Congregation Beth Yeshurun Reading: Robinson, pp. 195-233, 306-309 Kushner, pp. 143-180, Telushkin, pp. 553- 570, 625-628 1. God a. Story of the Blind People and the elephant or driving on foggy road at night with signposts b. God as Creator, One/Unique, Incorporeal (never is, was, will be human), stands outside time/space, the Omni’s (omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent); is God omnipotent? – then why do bad things happen to good people? (later topic) c. Man in image of God = mind/spirit/soul = that which feels, thinks, knows right from wrong and can choose d. God as “Force” (Kaplan/Star Wars) or “Being”? e. Prayerbook as “authorized theology” for lay people. f. Religion uses metaphors for God as telescopes – trying to see clearer “image” of God. Don’t look at the telescope, but through it. Adon Olam prayer as description of Philosopher’s God + Personal God 2. Revelation/Torah a. Is Torah word for word the word of God? Orthodox view. The problems with Mosaic authorship. The “Un-Orthodox” view: Modern Biblical criticism (Documentary Hypothesis: J-E-P-D). But if that is the case, what is the Torah’s authority? b. How does God communicate? What does God reveal – Godself or a specific message? If a message, how “specific”? and how? c. The Case of “Famous Amos”. Radio transmitter/receiver analogy. Jewish tradition: Moses was the best. d. Elliot Dorff handout. Conservative I, II, III, and IV 3. Mitzvot a. Good thing, not a bad thing.
    [Show full text]
  • FIFA and the WEIGHT of the WORLD Parashat Naso – May 29, 2015 / 5775 – Rabbi Joel Nickerson
    FIFA AND THE WEIGHT OF THE WORLD Parashat Naso – May 29, 2015 / 5775 – Rabbi Joel Nickerson Beyond the borders of the United States, there is a religion which holds millions within its grasp; a religion that simultaneously unites nations and yet also divides people with sometimes raucous and destructive results. It is a religion with temples around the world – temples regularly packed with thousands of people, all of whom participate in chants that shake the floor and deafen the ears. There are tribes within this religion which unite under various colors and crests and who clash with one another in tragic ways. It is a religion that has slowly made its way into our secularized society here in the United States, though its strategy for proselytizing has not caught on as strongly as its followers would hope. Around the world, it uses celebrity members to attract attention and support, with its main strategy being a focus on the youth – offering dreams of messianic redemption from the slums and squalor of many of the world’s poorest cities and regions. It has found its place within political inner circles and swayed nations to redirect millions of dollars towards its own causes and its own growth. Operating largely behind closed doors, just in the years between 2011 and 2014, it has an estimated revenue of $5.7 billion! This religion, in preparation for one of its large celebrations in 2022, is building a new series of temples in Qatar. Under the blistering heat of that desert nation, hundreds of migrant workers, many from Nepal and other South Asian nations, have died in conditions that have violated international labor laws and human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis 25 By: Dr
    XLI. Genesis in Biblical Perspective The Gospel of Christ from Genesis “The Last Words and Deeds of Abraham” Genesis 25 By: Dr. Harry L. Reeder III We are going to bring to a conclusion the life of Abraham as we come to the Lord’s Supper in Genesis 25. Genesis 25:1–18 says [1] Abraham took another wife, whose name was Keturah. [2] She bore him Zimran, Jokshan, Medan, Midian, Ishbak, and Shuah. [3] Jokshan fathered Sheba and Dedan. The sons of Dedan were Asshurim, Letushim, and Leummim. [4] The sons of Midian were Ephah, Epher, Hanoch, Abida, and Eldaah. All these were the children of Keturah. [5] Abraham gave all he had to Isaac. [6] But to the sons of his concubines Abraham gave gifts, and while he was still living he sent them away from his son Isaac, eastward to the east country. [7] These are the days of the years of Abraham's life, 175 years. [8] Abraham breathed his last and died in a good old age, an old man and full of years, and was gathered to his people. [9] Isaac and Ishmael his sons buried him in the cave of Machpelah, in the field of Ephron the son of Zohar the Hittite, east of Mamre, [10] the field that Abraham purchased from the Hittites. There Abraham was buried, with Sarah his wife. [11] After the death of Abraham, God blessed Isaac his son. And Isaac settled at Beer-lahai-roi. [12] These are the generations of Ishmael, Abraham's son, whom Hagar the Egyptian, Sarah's servant, bore to Abraham.
    [Show full text]