Genomic Medicine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genomic Medicine HOUSE OF LORDS Science and Technology Committee 2nd Report of Session 2008–09 Genomic Medicine Volume I: Report Ordered to be printed 2 June 2009 and published 7 July 2009 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £15.50 HL Paper 107–I Science and Technology Committee The Science and Technology Committee is appointed by the House of Lords in each session “to consider science and technology”. Current Membership The Members of the Science and Technology Committee are: Lord Broers Lord Methuen Lord Colwyn Baroness Neuberger Lord Crickhowell Earl of Northesk Lord Cunningham of Felling Lord O’Neill of Clackmannan Lord Haskel Earl of Selborne Lord Krebs Lord Sutherland of Houndwood (Chairman) Lord May of Oxford Lord Warner The Members of the Sub-Committee which carried out the inquiry (Science and Technology, Sub- Committee II) are: Lord Broers Lord Patel (Chairman) Lord Colwyn Baroness Perry of Southwark Baroness Finlay of Llandaff Lord Sutherland of Houndwood Lord Krebs Lord Taverne Earl of Northesk Lord Warner Baroness O’Neill of Bengarve Lord Winston Information about the Committee and Publications Information about the Science and Technology Committee, including details of current inquiries, can be found on the internet at http://www.parliament.uk/hlscience/. Committee publications, including reports, press notices, transcripts of evidence and government responses to reports, can be found at the same address. Committee reports are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. General Information General information about the House of Lords and its Committees, including guidance to witnesses, details of current inquiries and forthcoming meetings is on the internet at: http://www.parliament.uk/about_lords/about_lords.cfm. Contacts for the Science and Technology Committee All correspondence should be addressed to: The Clerk of the Science and Technology Committee Committee Office House of Lords London SW1A 0PW The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6075. The Committee’s email address is [email protected]. CONTENTS Paragraph Page Summary 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 7 Background 1.1 7 The inquiry 1.5 7 Structure of the Report 1.6 8 Acknowledgements 1.9 8 Chapter 2: Genomic Science and Genomic Medicine 9 Introduction 2.1 9 Advances in genome technologies 2.3 11 Genetics of rare and common diseases 2.6 12 Identification of susceptibility genes for common diseases 2.10 15 Medical applications of genomic science 2.12 16 Bioinformatics and genomic medicine 2.32 20 The role of epigenetics in disease 2.37 21 The importance of biobanks and population cohorts for advancing genomic science 2.40 21 Conclusion 2.44 22 Chapter 3: Translating Human Genomic Research into Clinical Practice 23 The framework for translational research in the UK 3.1 23 Funding and translational research in genomic medicine 3.7 24 Strategies to facilitate translational research in the NHS 3.13 26 Assessment, evaluation and regulation of diagnostic tests 3.27 29 The development of stratified or personalised uses of medicines 3.42 32 Encouraging innovation in the biotechnology and healthcare sectors 3.58 36 Chapter 4: Implementation and Service Delivery through the NHS 37 Introduction 4.1 37 Integration of genetics into mainstream practice 4.10 39 Infrastructure investment 4.13 40 Provision of genetic services in the NHS 4.15 40 Commissioning of genetic services 4.20 42 Commissioning across the NHS 4.24 42 Uptake of pharmacogenetic tests in the NHS 4.29 43 Provision of laboratory services 4.35 45 Chapter 5: Computational use of Medical and Genomic Data: Medical Informatics and Bioinformatics 49 Introduction 5.1 49 The emergence and growth of bioinformatics 5.4 49 Linking informatics with electronic medical records 5.10 50 Developing expertise in bioinformatics 5.22 53 Immediate informatics needs of NHS Regional Genetics Centres and laboratories 5.26 53 Chapter 6: Public engagement and ethical, social and legal issues 55 Introduction 6.1 55 Public engagement 6.3 55 Ethical aspects particular to genomic research and medicine 6.9 56 Use of genetic information for insurance and employment purposes—genetic discrimination 6.31 61 Direct to Consumer Tests 6.51 64 Chapter 7: Training, education and workforce planning 70 Introduction 7.1 70 Genetic testing in common diseases—educational and training needs across the NHS 7.3 70 Medical students 7.7 71 Doctors in primary and secondary care 7.9 71 Genetics education for nurses 7.23 74 Provision of genetic counsellors 7.25 75 The role of the National Genetic Education and Development Centre 7.34 76 Laboratory scientists, modernising scientific careers, workforce planning and re-training 7.38 77 Workforce planning and delivery 7.44 78 Chapter 8: List of recommendations and conclusions 80 Appendix 1: Members and Declarations of Interest 89 Appendix 2: Witnesses 91 Appendix 3: Call for Evidence 96 Appendix 4: Seminar held at the House of Lords 98 Appendix 5: Visit to Washington DC, United States 109 Appendix 6: Acronyms and Glossary 122 Appendix 7: Recent Reports 127 NOTE: The Report of the Committee is published in Volume I, HL Paper No 107–I The Evidence of the Committee is published in Volume II, HL Paper No 107–II Volumes I and II are available on the internet at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld/ldsctech.htm Reference in the text of the Report as follows: (Q) refers to a question in oral evidence (p) refers to a page of written evidence (paragraph) refers to a paragraph in the report SUMMARY Modern, effective healthcare rests upon centuries of scientific advances and innovation that have been shown in clinical trials and other studies to prevent, cure or alleviate human disease. Every so often, a scientific advance offers new opportunities for making real advances in medical care. From the evidence given to this inquiry, we believe that the sequencing of the human genome, and the knowledge and technological advances that accompanied this landmark achievement, represent such an advance. The 2003 White Paper, Our inheritance our future, recognised the potential impact of genetics and the genome project on our lives and our healthcare, and the importance of preparing the National Health Service (NHS) to be able to respond to this new knowledge. The investment that resulted from the White Paper enabled development of new genetics knowledge, skills and provision of services within the NHS. It targeted the diagnosis and treatment of rare single-gene disorders under the care of clinical geneticists based in Regional Genetics Centres and significantly advanced the capabilities and knowledge for managing these disorders. But the White Paper could hardly have anticipated the remarkable advances since 2003, including the charting of the genetic causes of a wide range of common diseases such as diabetes, coronary heart disease and several cancers. These scientific advances are with us now, and the use of genomic diagnostics to provide more rational and increasingly personalised management of common diseases has already started to permeate clinical practice in mainstream specialties across the NHS. The new knowledge of these genomic studies is still very fresh. It will be several years, for example, before prediction of common diseases will lead to the realistic possibility of disease prevention. But the use of many types of genomic tests is increasing rapidly, both in the NHS and in tests sold directly to consumers, and the availability of these tests will, in time, have a dramatic impact on disease diagnosis and management. This is already placing strain on the expertise of doctors, nurses and healthcare scientists who at present are poorly equipped to use genomic tests effectively and to interpret them accurately, indicating the urgent need for much wider education of healthcare professionals and the public in “genomic medicine”. Advances in genomic science will present challenges for delivering genomic tests across the mainstream specialties, suggesting the need for greater co-ordination and consolidation in “molecular pathology”, with new models for service delivery. Genomic advances also present opportunities for industry, with commercial opportunities in biotechnology as the power of genome sequencing methods continues to increase, and challenges and opportunities to the pharmaceutical industry who are increasingly using genetic testing in the drug development pipeline to develop more effective and safer drugs for which genetic tests are part of the prescribing process. Scientific advances also present social, legal and ethical challenges, with increasing amounts of personal genetic information being generated for both research and healthcare, raising concerns about personal privacy, data security and the potential for discrimination. These challenges must be faced if an appropriate balance is to be found between legitimate use of genetic information in research and protection of individual choice and privacy. In our inquiry, we have investigated these many aspects of genomic medicine, and make recommendations to ensure that the challenges afforded by advances in genomic science are met and the opportunities exploited. If our recommendations are taken forward, we believe that the UK will benefit in terms both of wealth generation and of improved health of the population. Genomic Medicine CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Background 1.1. Scientists in the UK have contributed significantly to the rich history of achievement in genetics and genomics during the last six decades: from the discovery of the structure of DNA in 1953 to the development of DNA sequencing in 1975, and as principal partners in completing the human genome sequence in 2000—hailed by President Bill Clinton and Prime Minister Tony Blair as “the most wondrous map ever produced by humankind”. 1.2. Until recently, geneticists have focused on identifying the genes that underlie “single-gene disorders”—rare diseases, caused by defects in single genes, such as Huntington’s disease, cystic fibrosis and sickle cell anaemia.
Recommended publications
  • EMBC Annual Report 2007
    EMBO | EMBC annual report 2007 EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY ORGANIZATION | EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY CONFERENCE EMBO | EMBC table of contents introduction preface by Hermann Bujard, EMBO 4 preface by Tim Hunt and Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard, EMBO Council 6 preface by Marja Makarow and Isabella Beretta, EMBC 7 past & present timeline 10 brief history 11 EMBO | EMBC | EMBL aims 12 EMBO actions 2007 15 EMBC actions 2007 17 EMBO & EMBC programmes and activities fellowship programme 20 courses & workshops programme 21 young investigator programme 22 installation grants 23 science & society programme 24 electronic information programme 25 EMBO activities The EMBO Journal 28 EMBO reports 29 Molecular Systems Biology 30 journal subject categories 31 national science reviews 32 women in science 33 gold medal 34 award for communication in the life sciences 35 plenary lectures 36 communications 37 European Life Sciences Forum (ELSF) 38 ➔ 2 table of contents appendix EMBC delegates and advisers 42 EMBC scale of contributions 49 EMBO council members 2007 50 EMBO committee members & auditors 2007 51 EMBO council members 2008 52 EMBO committee members & auditors 2008 53 EMBO members elected in 2007 54 advisory editorial boards & senior editors 2007 64 long-term fellowship awards 2007 66 long-term fellowships: statistics 82 long-term fellowships 2007: geographical distribution 84 short-term fellowship awards 2007 86 short-term fellowships: statistics 104 short-term fellowships 2007: geographical distribution 106 young investigators 2007 108 installation
    [Show full text]
  • Science & Policy Meeting Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz Science in The
    SUMMER 2014 ISSUE 27 encounters page 9 Science in the desert EMBO | EMBL Anniversary Science & Policy Meeting pageS 2 – 3 ANNIVERSARY TH page 8 Interview Jennifer E M B O 50 Lippincott-Schwartz H ©NI Membership expansion EMBO News New funding for senior postdoctoral In perspective Georgina Ferry’s enlarges its membership into evolution, researchers. EMBO Advanced Fellowships book tells the story of the growth and ecology and neurosciences on the offer an additional two years of financial expansion of EMBO since 1964. occasion of its 50th anniversary. support to former and current EMBO Fellows. PAGES 4 – 6 PAGE 11 PAGES 16 www.embo.org HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE EMBO|EMBL ANNIVERSARY SCIENCE AND POLICY MEETING transmissible cancer: the Tasmanian devil facial Science meets policy and politics tumour disease and the canine transmissible venereal tumour. After a ceremony to unveil the 2014 marks the 50th anniversary of EMBO, the 45th anniversary of the ScienceTree (see box), an oak tree planted in soil European Molecular Biology Conference (EMBC), the organization of obtained from countries throughout the European member states who fund EMBO, and the 40th anniversary of the European Union to symbolize the importance of European integration, representatives from the govern- Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL). EMBO, EMBC, and EMBL recently ments of France, Luxembourg, Malta, Spain combined their efforts to put together a joint event at the EMBL Advanced and Switzerland took part in a panel discussion Training Centre in Heidelberg, Germany, on 2 and 3 July 2014. The moderated by Marja Makarow, Vice President for Research of the Academy of Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • Jarid2 Coordinates Nanog Expression and PCP/Wnt Signaling Required for Efficient ESC Differentiation and Early Embryo Developmen
    Article Jarid2 Coordinates Nanog Expression and PCP/Wnt Signaling Required for Efficient ESC Differentiation and Early Embryo Development Graphical Abstract Authors David Landeira, Hakan Bagci, Andrzej R. Malinowski, ..., Thomas Carroll, Matthias Merkenschlager, Amanda G. Fisher Correspondence [email protected] (D.L.), amanda.fi[email protected] (A.G.F.) In Brief Landeira et al. show that Jarid2-null ESCs have reduced Wnt9a/Prickle1/Fzd2 and low b-catenin activity, resulting in altered adhesion, constitutive expression of Nanog, and failure to differentiate. Their experiments identify a non-canonical function for Jarid2 in regulating the balance between ESC self-renewal and differentiation. Highlights d ESCs lacking Jarid2 show constitutive Nanog expression d ESCs lacking Jarid2 have reduced PCP/Wnt signaling d Co-culture of Jarid2-null and WT ESCs restores differentiation capability d Jarid2-null ESCs form more than one ICM upon injection to E3.5 mouse blastocysts Landeira et al., 2015, Cell Reports 12, 573–586 July 28, 2015 ª2015 The Authors http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.060 Cell Reports Article Jarid2 Coordinates Nanog Expression andPCP/WntSignalingRequiredforEfficient ESC Differentiation and Early Embryo Development David Landeira,1,2,5,* Hakan Bagci,1,5 Andrzej R. Malinowski,1,5 Karen E. Brown,1 Jorge Soza-Ried,1 Amelie Feytout,1 Zoe Webster,3 Elodie Ndjetehe,3 Irene Cantone,1 Helena G. Asenjo,2 Neil Brockdorff,4 Thomas Carroll,1 Matthias Merkenschlager,1 and Amanda G. Fisher1,* 1Lymphocyte Development Group, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK 2Department of Computer Science and A.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffrage Science Contents
    Suffrage science Contents Introduction Brenda Maddox and Vivienne Parry on sex and success in science 3 Love Professor Sarah-Jayne Blakemore and Dr Helen Fisher on love and social cognition 6 Life Professor Liz Robertson and Dr Sohaila Rastan on developmental biology and genetics 10 Structure Professor Dame Louise Johnson and Professor Janet Thornton on structural biology 15 Strife Professors Fiona Watt and Mary Collins on cancer and AIDS 19 Suffrage Heirloom Jewellery Designs to commemorate women in science 23 Suffrage Textiles Ribbons referencing the suffrage movement 33 Index of Featured Women Scientists Pioneering female contributions to Life Science 43 Acknowledgements Contributions and partnerships 47 Tracing Suffrage Heirlooms Follow the provenance of 13 pieces of Suffrage Heirloom Jewellery 48 1 A successful career in science is always demanding of intellect “ hard work and resilience; only more so for most women. ” Professor Dame Sally C Davies From top, left to right: (Row 1) Anne McLaren, Barbara McClintock, Beatrice Hahn, Mina Bissell, Brenda Maddox, Dorothy Hodgkin, (Row 2) Brigid Hogan, Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard, Fiona Watt, Gail Martin, Helen Fisher, Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, (Row 3) Hilde Mangold, Jane Goodall, Elizabeth Blackburn, Janet Thornton, Carol Greider, Rosalind Franklin, (Row 4) Kathleen Lonsdale, Liz Robertson, Louise Johnson, Mary Lyon, Mary Collins, Vivienne Parry, (Row 5) Uta Frith, Amanda Fisher, Linda Buck, Sara-Jayne Blakemore, Sohaila Rastan, Zena Werb 2 Introduction To commemorate 100 years of International Women’s Day in 2011, Suffrage Science unites the voices of leading female life scientists Brona McVittie talks to Vivienne Parry and Brenda Maddox about sex and success in science Dorothy Hodgkin remains the only British woman to Brenda Maddox is author of The Dark Lady of DNA, have been awarded a Nobel Prize for science.
    [Show full text]
  • BERLIN INSTITUTE of HEALTH ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Imprint
    BERLIN INSTITUTE OF HEALTH ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Imprint Publisher Berlin Institute of Health Prof. Ernst Th. Rietschel (Chairman of the Board of Directors) Kapelle-Ufer 2 | 10117 Berlin, Germany www.bihealth.org/en Responsible: Alexandra Hensel (Head of Communications) Berlin, May 2015 Photo credits titel top: Exzellenzcluster NeuroCure, Rosenmund lab titel bottom: NGFN/BMBF (left and center), PT DLR/BMBF (right) page 5: Prof. Ernst Th. Rietschel page 7: Tom Maelsa/BIH page 9, 10, 13, 14 und 15 (right): Tom Maelsa/BIH page 12: (top) Simon Jacob, (bottom) James Poulet (private) page 15: Steffen Weber-Carstens, Jens Fielitz und Carmen Birchmeier (private) page 17: Wiebke Peitz/Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin page 18 and 19: PT DLR/BMBF, NGFN/BMBF page 23 and 24: BIH page 25: Alf Wachsmann/MDC (left), stefanolunardi/shutterstock (right) page 26: Johannes Wilberts/Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm page 27: PT DLR/BMBF page 29: Carl Goetzke, Mirjam Karber, Julia Löffler, Carmen Lorenz, Christian Lücht, Rebeka Major, Julian Pholan, Henrike Lisa Sczakiel (private) page 31: Wiebke Peitz/Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin page 32: BIH Young Science page 35: Wiebke Peitz/Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, NGFN/BMBF page 36: NGFN/BMBF page 37: Jens Jeske/BIH page 38: Tom Maelsa/BIH (top), Jens Jeske/BIH (bottom) Design Baroneska. Studio für Gestaltung www.baroneska.de Printing Druckteam Berlin Printed on PEFC-certified paper. The paper originates from sustainable managed forests and legal sources. CONTENTS Important Events in 2014 4 Preface
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Epigenetic Change Induced by in Utero Dietary Challenge Provokes Phenotypic Variability Across Multiple Generations of Mice M
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.07.241034; this version posted August 7, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Epigenetic change induced by in utero dietary challenge provokes phenotypic variability across multiple generations of mice Mathew Van de Pette1, Antonio Galvao2,3,4, Steven J. Millership5, Wilson To1, Andrew Dimond1, Chiara Prodani1, Grainne McNamara1, Ludovica Bruno1, Alessandro Sardini6, Zoe Webster7, James McGinty8, Paul French8, Anthony G. Uren9, Juan Castillo-Fernandez2, Rosalind M. John10, Anne C. Ferguson-Smith11, Matthias Merkenschlager1, Gavin Kelsey2,4 and Amanda G. Fisher1* 1 Lymphocyte Development Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. 2 Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK. 3 Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of PAS, Department of Reproductive Immunology and Pathology, Olsztyn, Poland. 4 Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EG, UK. 5 Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. 6 Whole Animal Physiology and Imaging, London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. 7 Transgenics and Embryonic Stem Cell Laboratory, London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. 8 Photonics Group, Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London, UK. 9 Cancer Genomics Group, MRC Institute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Escs Keep Their Options Open
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS CHROMATIN TECHNIQUES ESCs keep their options open 1 1 1 Two powerful technologies enabled studies ESC HSC T Phase genes were late-replicating, which is charac- methods Cripto G1 S1 S2 S3 S4 G2 of chromatin that revealed features poten- Esg1 teristic of silenced chromatin. The authors tially responsible for the pluripotency of Fgf4 suggest that this is indicative of a difference Foxd3 embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Nanog in transcriptional ‘competence’ and is a mark Oct4 Various studies have suggested that the Rex1 of lineage state. .com/nature e pattern of epigenetic modification may Utf1 They observed concomitant H3Lys4 and mark a cell’s developmental stage. There are H3Lys27 methylation, and were encouraged .natur Figure 1 | Replication-timing analysis of ESCs, many modifications that modulate chroma- that Bernstein et al. also observed this sur- w HSCs and T lymphocytes according to the extent of tin structure; among them are methylation replication during G1, G2 and throughout S phase. prising combination at other developmental of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3Lys4) and lysine Reprinted with permission from Nature Cell Biology. genes. “So these two papers really comple- 27 (H3Lys27), which regulate transcription mented each other, and gave you this idea http://ww positively and negatively, respectively. that you might have a significant compo- oup To study the pattern of histone modifi- helped push the biology, helped us see this nent of the genome being primed and ready r G cation, Bradley Bernstein of Massachusetts unique pattern, and also believe it because we to go in [ESCs] but being held in check by General Hospital, Harvard Medical School saw it again and again.” The authors suggest [H3Lys27] methylation,” says Fisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Jarid2 Is a PRC2 Component in Embryonic Stem Cells Required for Multi-Lineage Differentiation and Recruitment of PRC1 and RNA Po
    Europe PMC Funders Group Author Manuscript Nat Cell Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 February 14. Published in final edited form as: Nat Cell Biol. 2010 June ; 12(6): 618–624. doi:10.1038/ncb2065. Europe PMC Funders Author Manuscripts Jarid2 is a PRC2 component in embryonic stem cells required for multi-lineage differentiation and recruitment of PRC1 and RNA Polymerase II to developmental regulators David Landeira1,8, Stephan Sauer1,8, Raymond Poot2, Maria Dvorkina1, Luca Mazzarella1, Helle F. Jørgensen1, C. Filipe Pereira1, Marion Leleu1, Francesco M. Piccolo1, Mikhail Spivakov1, Emily Brookes3, Ana Pombo3, Cynthia Fisher1,4, William C. Skarnes4, Tim Snoek2, Karel Bezstarosti5, Jeroen Demmers5, Robert J. Klose6, Miguel Casanova7, Ligia Tavares7, Neil Brockdorff7, Matthias Merkenschlager1, and Amanda G. Fisher1,9 1Lymphocyte Development Group, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK 2Department of Cell Biology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015GE, Rotterdam, Netherlands 3Genome Function Group, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK 4Mouse Developmental Genetics Group, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA UK 5Proteomics Center, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015GE, Rotterdam, Netherlands 6Epigenetic Regulation of Chromatin Function Group Department of Biochemistry,
    [Show full text]
  • MRC Investigators and Directors Directory of Research Programmes at MRC Institutes and Units Foreword
    SUMMER 2021 MRC Investigators and Directors Directory of research programmes at MRC Institutes and Units Foreword I am delighted to introduce you to the exceptional To support the MRC Investigators and Directors researchers at our MRC Institutes and Units – the in advancing medical research, MRC provides MRC Investigators and their Directors. core funding to the MRC Institutes and University Units where they carry out their work. These In November 2020, MRC established the new title establishments cover a huge breadth of medical of “MRC Investigator” for Programme Leaders (PL) research from molecular biology to public health. and Programme Leader Track (PLT) researchers at As you will see from the directory, the MRC MRC Institutes and Units. These individuals are Investigators and Directors are making considerable world-class scientists who are either strong leaders advances in their respective fields through their in their field already (PLs) or are making great innovative and exciting research programmes. Their strides towards that goal (PLTs). Based on what accomplishments have been recognised beyond they have achieved in their research careers so far, MRC and many have been awarded notable prizes the title will no doubt become synonymous with and elected to learned societies and organisations. scientific accomplishment, impact and integrity. As well as being widely recognised within the MRC endeavours to do everything it can to support scientific and academic communities, the well- its researchers at all career stages. For this reason, established and newer title of “Director” and we chose not to distinguish between levels of “MRC Investigator”, respectively, are a signal seniority within the new title.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2003 (No. 9)
    A publication for graduates and friends of Bishop’s University www.ubishops.ca Hiking for Health Care Two Bishop’s students volunteer in Jamaica....5 Inside: Bill MacDonald ’73: Alumnus of the Year......3 Documentary on Kay Kinsman ......................7 Dominic Mammola ’78 works with NYPD .....10.....10 Publications Mail No. 40027187 No. 9 • January 2003 Association News Alumni Association National Committee For students, moving to college Graham Moodie ’69, President for the first time is an emotional ([email protected]) experience filled with happiness and Eric Mills’72, Past Pres. ([email protected]) excitement, sadness, and at least a Peter Davidson ’77, Vice President little anxiety. ([email protected]) Many parents also looked lost, Sterling Mawhinney ’88, Member-at-large the realization setting in that they ([email protected]) would not be bringing their children Jennifer Royea ’96, Member-at-large home with them that day. One mother ([email protected]) confided to me that having the Alumni Fred Scalabrini ’92, Member-at-large ([email protected]) President on hand helped ease her Trevor Lovig ’96, President, Alumni Football anxieties about sending her son off to Association ([email protected]) a university so far away from home. Dave Henry ’95, BC Branch ([email protected]) lumni can make tangible I think the time has come for John Messenger ’97, Calgary Branch differences to the life of a Bishop’s to follow the lead of many ([email protected]) Auniversity in many ways. other schools and develop a project to Grant Siméon ’85, Eastern Townships Branch The Macleans rankings of have alumni help ease first day jitters ([email protected]) Canadian universities released last by being present on campus to Shirley Kitching Duncan ’56, Gaspé Branch November showed Bishop’s in fifth welcome frosh.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report & Accounts 2006-2007
    Annual Report & Accounts 2006-2007 Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Annual Report & Accounts 2006-2007 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State, and by the Comptroller and Auditor General, in pursuance of Schedule 1, Sections 2 [2] and 3 [3] of the Science and Technology Act 1965. Ordered to be printed by the House of Commons 16 July 2007 HC 720 LONDON: The Stationery Office £13.50 Contents PART 1: MANAGEMENT COMMENTARY Chairman’s statement 1 Chief Executive’s report 2 A healthy UK science base 4 Providing the environment for world-leading research 4 Ensuring our operations are fit for purpose 5 Maintaining the UK’s research portfolio 6 Sponsored institutes 8 Opening new avenues in bioscience 10 Capturing scientific opportunities 12 Tackling major challenges 14 New international opportunities 16 Economic and social impact 18 Technology Strategy 19 Collaborative research with industry 20 Commercialising research outputs 21 Securing the skills base 23 People and knowledge flow 25 Industry-relevant training 25 Career development 26 2006-2007 Embedding our science in society 28 Opinion gathering and public dialogue 29 Outreach and engagement 30 Engaging young people in science 31 Corporate information 32 Council 32 Boards, Panels and Committees 33 Organisational developments 38 Efficiency, Research Council harmonisation, BBSRC Annual Report & Accounts BBSRC Risk management, Staff report, Environmental policy, Health and Safety, Diversity Financial review 40 Financial highlights, Pensions, Creditor payment policy, Audit Information Remuneration report 42 PART 2: ANNUAL ACCOUNTS Financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2007 45 This Annual Report covers activities during the period 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • HIV/AIDS Research at the NCI:A Record of Sustained Excellence
    HIV/AIDS Research at the NCI: A Record of Sustained Excellence National Cancer Institute Institute Cancer National U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health HIV/AIDS Research at the National Cancer Institute: A Record of Sustained Excellence Letter from the Director of the CCR ............................................................................................................1 The Early NCI Retrovirus Experience ...........................................................................................................2 A New Virus Revealed ......................................................................................................................2 Risk Factors ........................................................................................................................................4 A Tale of Two Diseases ...............................................................................................................................5 Treating the Infection .........................................................................................................................5 Treating the Cancers .........................................................................................................................6 HIV and the Immune System: How They Interact........................................................................................8 Susceptibility to Infection, AIDS, and Related Diseases ..........................................................................10
    [Show full text]