Commission Moves Against Austria for Failing to Apply Rules on Sewage

Brussels, 6. April 2001

&RPPLVVLRQ PRYHV DJDLQVW $XVWULD IRU IDLOLQJ WR DSSO\UXOHVRQVHZDJHVOXGJH

7KH (XURSHDQ &RPPLVVLRQ KDV GHFLGHG WR VHQG D 5HDVRQHG 2SLQLRQ VHFRQG ZULWWHQ ZDUQLQJ WR $XVWULD IRU IDLOLQJ WR DGRSW WKH QDWLRQDO OHJLVODWLRQ UHTXLUHG WR JLYH HIIHFW WR WKH &RPPXQLW\ V 6HZDJH 6OXGJH 'LUHFWLYH7KH'LUHFWLYHSURYLGHVIRUTXDOLW\FRQWUROFKHFNVWREHFDUULHGRXW RQVHZDJHVOXGJHXVHGLQDJULFXOWXUHLQSDUWLFXODUWRDYRLGWKHEXLOGXSRI KHDY\ PHWDOV LQ VRLO ,Q $XVWULD QLQH /lQGHU KDYH OHJLVODWLYH UHVSRQVLELOLW\ IRU FRQWUROOLQJ WKH XVH RI VHZDJH VOXGJH +RZHYHU WKH\ KDYH HLWKHU QRW DGRSWHG DQ\ VSHFLILF OHJLVODWLRQ RU KDYH DGRSWHG OHJLVODWLRQ WKDW RPLWV FHUWDLQ &RPPXQLW\ UHTXLUHPHQWV (QYLURQPHQW &RPPLVVLRQHU 0DUJRW :DOOVWU|P VDLG 7KH TXDOLW\ RI RXU IRRG GHSHQGV RQ KLJK VWDQGDUGV LQ DJULFXOWXUH , XUJH $XVWULD WR PDNH VXUH WKDW LWV OHJLVODWLRQ IXOO\ UHIOHFWV &RPPXQLW\UXOHVRQWKHVDIHXVHRIVHZDJHVOXGJH

The Sewage Sludge Directive requires that sewage sludge used for agriculture be regulated by Member States. Austria should have complied with the Directive from the date of its accession to the Community, i.e. as of 1 January 1995. Under the Austrian constitution, Austria's nine Länder have the legislative responsibility for controlling the use of sewage sludge for agriculture. Before the current proceedings were started in 1999, most of the Länder – with the exception of Salzburg, the Tyrol and Vienna - had implemented specific sewage sludge laws, but these laws had serious shortcomings, especially in Carinthia. Following the Letter of Formal Notice (first written warning) from the Commission in January 2000, and a subsequent meeting between the Commission and Austrian officials, Austria provided the Commission with a legal amendment to the law of Lower Austria and new laws for Vienna and the Tyrol. However, deficiencies still remain. Salzburg, for example, has still not transposed the Directive, and the legislation in other Länder often falls short of what is required. The following summary shows which main provisions of the Directive the Länder have failed to implement adequately:

Council Directive 86/278/EEC on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soil, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture &DULQWKLD: The prohibition on the use of sewage sludge where soils contain excessive levels of heavy metals and the requirement to prevent the excessive build- up of heavy metals due to the use of sludge; the rules to be observed when using sludge, for example, to ensure that water quality is not affected. &DULQWKLD and 6W\ULD: The requirement that sewage sludge be treated, or, if untreated, have its use specifically authorised. %XUJHQODQG and &DULQWKLD: The prohibition on the use of sludge for certain types of agriculture (e.g. on soil in which vegetable crops are growing). %XUJHQODQG &DULQWKLD /RZHU $XVWULD 6W\ULD WKH 7\URO and 9RUDUOEHUJ: The rules for testing sludge and soil. %XUJHQODQG &DULQWKLD /RZHU $XVWULD 8SSHU $XVWULD 6W\ULD WKH 7\URO and 9RUDUOEHUJ: The requirement to keep up-to-date records relating to sludge.

%DFNJURXQG As guardian of the EC Treaty, the Commission must ensure that the legal requirements of the Treaty and adopted legislation are respected by Member States. The procedure being followed in this case relates to Article 226 of the Treaty, which gives the Commission powers to take legal action against a Member State that is not respecting its obligations. If the Commission considers that there may be an infringement of Community law which warrants the opening of an infringement procedure, it addresses a "Letter of Formal Notice" to the Member State concerned, requesting it to submit its observations by a specified date, usually two months, as in this case. In the light of the reply or absence of a reply from the Member State concerned, the Commission may decide to address a "Reasoned Opinion" (or second written warning) to the Member State, clearly and definitively setting out the reasons why it considers there to have been an infringement of Community law and calling on the Member State to comply within a specified period (normally two months). If the Member State fails to comply with the Reasoned Opinion, the Commission may decide to bring the case before the European Court of Justice.