Australian Literacies. Informing National Policy on Literacy Education. INSTITUTION National Languages and Literacy Inst., Melbourne (Australia)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Australian Literacies. Informing National Policy on Literacy Education. INSTITUTION National Languages and Literacy Inst., Melbourne (Australia) DOCUMENT RESUME ED 411 454 CE 074 789 AUTHOR Lo Bianco, Joseph; Freebody, Peter TITLE Australian Literacies. Informing National Policy on Literacy Education. INSTITUTION National Languages and Literacy Inst., Melbourne (Australia). SPONS AGENCY Australian Dept. of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra. ISBN ISBN-1-875578-67-6 PUB DATE 1997-00-00 NOTE 194p. AVAILABLE FROM Language Australia Publications, Level 9, 300 Flinders Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia ($29 Australian). PUB TYPE Books (010) Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; *Adult Literacy; Bilingual Education; Catholic Schools; Cultural Differences; Cultural Pluralism; Early Childhood Education; Economically Disadvantaged; *Educational Environment; Educational Needs; Educational Planning; *Educational Policy; English (Second Language); Foreign Countries; Indigenous Populations; Lifelong Learning; *Literacy Education; Literature Reviews; National Programs; Numeracy; *Policy Formation; Postsecondary Education; Private Schools; Public Schools; Secondary Education; *Sociocultural Patterns; Special Needs Students; State of the Art Reviews; Statewide Planning; Synthesis; Trend Analysis; Workplace Literacy IDENTIFIERS *Australia ABSTRACT This book, which is intended to inform Australia's education community about various aspects of the national literacy debate and the policy development process, reviews the literature on literacy teaching in secondary and postsecondary education and the workplace and describes the sociocultural and educational context for development of literacy policy and programs in the 1990s. Among the topics discussed in the book's six parts are the following: part 1, broad context of literacy education (the powers of literacy; literacy levels among Australians; and citizenship, social equity, and competence); part 2, necessary content of a national policy on literacy (policy context; purpose and scope; definitions; considerations in defining literacy; teaching cycles); part 3, Australia's learners (Australian English speakers, language diversity and English literacy, indigenous Australians, special needs, socioeconomic disadvantage); part 4, school literacy education (the early years, the middle years, the later years, the postschooling sector); part 5, adult literacy, numeracy, English-as-a-Second-Language) education, and lifelong learning for all; and part 6, state and territory programs in literacy (literacy teaching and learning in department of education schools in South Australia, Australian Capital Territory, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, Tasmania, New South Wales, and the Northen Territory and literacy teaching and learning and current practices in literacy education in the Catholic and independent schools sectors). (Contains 162 references) (MN) AUSTRALIAN LITERACIE5 informing national policy on literacy education U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PERMISSION TO REPRODUCEAND Office Educational Research and Improvement DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL EDUOATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION HAS BEEN GRANTED BY CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization 4 originating it. ID Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. affiffr TO HE EDUCATIONAL Points of view or opinions stated in this RESOURCES document do not necessarily represent INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) official OERI position or policy. I by Joseph Lo Bianco and Peter Freebody BEST COPY AVAILABLE 1 2 1 Australian Literacies AUSTRALIAN LITERACIES Informing national policy on literacy education by Joseph Lo Bianco Peter Freebody LANGUAGE AUSTRALIA The National Languages and Literocy Institute of Australia THIS PROJECT WAS SUPPORTED BY A GRANT FROM THE COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION, TRAINING AND YOUTH AFFAIRS; THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHORS AND DO NOT NECESSARILY. REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION, TRAINING AND YOUTH AFFAIRS. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Lo Bianco, Joseph Australian Literacies: informing national policy on literacy education Includes bibliographical references. ISBN: 1 875578 67 6 1. Language policyAustralia. 2. Literacy - Government policy - Australia. I. Freebody, Peter. II. Language Australia. III. Title. 379.240994 © Copyright 1997 Commonwealth of Australia No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. Language Australia, PO Box 31, Belconnen ACT 2614, Australia For information regarding production and marketing of this publication contact David Dickson, Language Australia Publications, GPO Box 372F, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia Australian Literacieswas researched and written by Language Australia: The National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia, through its Child English as a Second Language and Literacy Research Network. Principal author: Joseph Lo Bianco, Chief Executive, Language Australia and Professor, Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong. Contributing author: Professor Peter Freebody, Centre for Literacy Education Research, Faculty of Education, Griffith University. Critical readers and contributors: Dr Penny McKay; Queensland University of Technology; Laraine Morris, University of Canberra; Chris Howell, Vice-President, Australian Council of TESOL Associations; Jennifer Haynes, President, Australian Association for the Teaching of English; David Howes, Vice-President, Australian Association for the Teaching of English; CecilNeilson,Principal Education Officer TESL, Northern Territory Department of Education, President of Australian Council of TESOL Associations Inc., Sally Thomson, Education Manager, Further Education Collective, Heidelberg, Victoria; Dr Ian Falk, Sub-Dean, Adult and Vocational Education Studies Unit, University of Tasmania; Dr Peter Wignell,Lecturer,Applied Linguistics,Northern Territory University; Dr Barbara Comber, Language and Literacy Research Centre, Faculty of Education, University of South Australia; Professor Desmond Power AM, Director,Centrefor Deafness and Communication Studies, Faculty of Education Griffith University; Marion Meiers, Executive Liaison Officer, Australian Literacy Federation; Professor Trevor Cairney, University of Western Sydney, Nepean; Professor Marie Emmit, Head, School of Social and Cultural Studies in Education, Deakin University and President, Australian Literacy Educators Association; Dianne Dean, Coordinator, Child English as a Second Language and Literacy Research Network; Jean Clayton, Manager, South Australian Teaching and Curriculum Centre, Language Australia; Rosa McKenna, Coordinator, Adult Literacy Research Network; Associate Professor Pam Peters, Style Council, Macquarie University; Associate Professor Bill Corcoran, Head, School of Language and Literacy Education, Queensland University of Technology; Dr Howard Nicholas, Graduate School of Education, La Trobe University; Glenda Shopen, Lecturer in Education, Australian Catholic University; Ann Kelly, President, Australian Council for Adult Literacy; Christina Davidson, President, Primary English Teaching Association; Claire Hiller, Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania; Dr Bill Cope, Centre for Workplace Communication and Culture; Professor Mary Kalantzis, The James Cook University of North Queensland; Dr Christina E. Van Kraayenoord, Schonell Special Education Research Centre, The University of Queensland; Professor Allan Luke, Dean and Head, Faculty and Graduate School of Education, The University of Queensland; Helen Moore, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto; Dr Richard B. Baldauf, Jr., Language Australia, Dina Guest, Assistant General Manager, LOTE, ESL and Multicultural Education Branch, Department of Education, Victoria. The sections describing the literacy education initiatives of the State and Territory education and training systems which appear in Part IVwere contributed by the following: Jim Del lit, Executive Director, Curriculum, Department for Education and Children's Services, South Australia; Alan Hird, Director, Schools Programs Branch, Australian Capital Territory Department of Education and Training and Children's Youth and Family Services Bureau; 7 Dr Allan Rice, Director of Early Childhood, Department of School Education, New South Wales; Vivienne Hayward, PrincipalEducationOfficer,Northern Territory Department of Education; Diane Wood, Senior Superintendent (Years K-4), Department of Education Cultural and Community Development, Tasmania; Andrew Connolly, Equity Projects Coordinator, Educational Programs Branch,Department of Education Community andCultural Development, Tasmania; Joan Bradbury, Assistant General Manager, Early Years Schooling, Department of Education Victoria; Jan Gil lies, Director Quality Assurance and School Review, Department of Education, Queensland; Gavin Morris, Learning Area Superintendent English, Department of Education, Western Australia; Glenda Shopen and Kevin Vassarotti on behalf of the Catholic education sector and Fergus Thomson on behalf of independent schools. 8 Contents FOREWORD PREAMBLE X V PART I: BROAD CONTEXT 1.1 THE POWERS OF LITERACY I 1.1.1 Introduction 1 1.1.2 The impact of changing economic patterns 2 1.1.3 The impact of communication technologies 6 1.1.4 The impact of global and national cultural diversity 9 1.2 HOW LITERATE ARE AUSTRALIANS? 1 2 1.3 CITIZENSHIP, SOCIAL EQUITY AND COMPETENCE 1 6 PART
Recommended publications
  • Indigenous Students Government
    SOUTH AUSTRALIA learning of Aboriginal students was developed and Objectives for additional options are now provided for gifted and schooling in South talented students, including the establishment of secondary schools to provide programs for students with Australia high intellectual potential; Government schools · Improving information technology services and infrastructure, including continuation of a needs-based In October 1997, the South Australian Department for subsidy scheme for schools to buy computers, providing Education and Children’s Services amalgamated with the training and development, developing standards for Department of Employment, Training and Further Education using information and communication technology in the to become the Department of Education, Training and curriculum, and strengthening electronic communication Employment (DETE). The department is committed to between sites; and providing high quality learning, teaching, care, employment and youth services within an integrated and · Creative, futures-oriented planning, including the supportive learning organisation and to continuous release of a declaration for public education and improvement in service and performance. children’s services, the development of a system-wide planning, monitoring and reporting framework, and Priority objectives for the government schooling sector in improving management of the department to implement 1997 were: the declaration and the strategic plan. · The early years, with a focus on transition, on basic literacy and numeracy
    [Show full text]
  • School Context Statement Template
    SCHOOL CONTEXT STATEMENT Updated: July 2018 School number: 1001 School name: AMATA ANANGU SCHOOL 1. General information Part A School name : Amata Anangu School School No. : 1001 Courier : Alice Springs Principal : Ms Sharon Diglio Postal Address : PMB 113, Amata, via Alice Springs NT 0872 Location Address : Amata 5750 District : Aboriginal Lands Distance from GPO : 1680 kms Phone No : 08 8956 2922 CPC attached : yes Fax No : 08 8956 7554 February FTE Enrolment 2016 2017 2018 Primary Special, N.A.P. Ungraded Reception 7 7 9 Year 1 6 8 10 Year 2 13 6 11 Year 3 11 9 10 Year 4 20 11 5 Year 5 1 14 14 Year 6 10 8 9 Year 7 10 9 14 Secondary Special, N.A.P. Ungraded Year 8 3 8 4 Year 9 9 6 7 Year 10 4 7 6 Year 11 6 8 2 Year 12 10 12 1 Year 12 plus 1 TOTAL 111 113 102 Context statement 2018 Part B • Deputy Principal’s name: Karalyn Jones (T4 2018) • School e-mail address:[email protected] • Staffing numbers Student Learning Coordinator 1 Teaching 14 SSO’s SSO 2 37.5hrs 2 SSO 1 35.00 hrs 1 Anangu Education Workers AEW 3 25hrs 2 AEW 1 15hrs 15 Pool Manager GSE 7 37.5hrs 1 Groundsperson GSE 2 15hrs 1 • Enrolment trends Enrolments tend to vary throughout the school year but current enrolments should remain stable over the next few years. Senior secondary are stable but transient at times. • Special arrangements This school is a member of The Anangu Lands Partnership and supported by the Anangu Education Service.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Revisioning Theories of Rurality and Rural Educational Leadership
    Revisioning theories of rurality and rural educational leadership: Rural contexts and rural school principals in Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. by Kathryn Gay Hardwick-Franco Thesis Submitted to Flinders University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Education, Psychology and Social Work February 2021 1 Declaration I certify that this thesis: 1. Does not incorporate without acknowledgment any material previously submitted for a degree or diploma in any university; and 2. To the best of my knowledge and belief, does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. Signed Kathryn Gay Hardwick-Franco Date 4th September 2020 I acknowledge and I am very thankful for the privilege that is the contribution of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. I am also thankful for the Australian Postgraduate Awards scholarship, founded by the Australian Federal Government. 2 Acknowledgment I acknowledge the support from my loving and wonderful husband, John Franco. I thank him for his unwavering support of my study for the past thirty years; since we met and fell in love at the University of Adelaide while studying the Bachelor of Arts. Without his support and encouragement, I could have invested neither the time nor money into my studies and research. I acknowledge the support of my beautiful daughters, Tijana and Grace. I thank them for their continued encouragement and fitting their lives in and around my study. Their friendship and intellect inspire me. What the next generation have to bring to the world is exciting and hope filled.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Cabinet
    COUNTRY CABINET Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands 30 April to 2 May 2017 | State Government Response COUNTRY CABINET APY Lands Index Premier’s Foreword 3 Foreword by the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation 4 Introduction 5 Country Cabinet 5 What we heard 6 Jobs and Training 9 Health and Wellbeing 11 Community Services 13 Education and Youth 15 Roads 17 Emergency Services 18 Governance and Land Rights 20 Technology and Communications 21 Environment and Water 22 Cattle Business 23 WARNING: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are warned this publication may contain images of deceased persons. Cover image credit: Mr Burton, Australia, c.1939 – 2017, Pitjantjatjara people, South Australia, Anumara Tjukurpa, 2008, Amata, South Australia, synthetic polymer paint on linen, 120.0 x 101.5 cm; Lillemor Andersen Bequest Fund 2008, Art Gallery of South Australia, Adelaide. © Hector Burton, Courtesy of Tjala Arts 2 Premier’s Foreword The Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands is a spectacular part of South Australia. It was a privilege for State Cabinet to visit the region and be welcomed to experience Anangu culture, visit amazing communities and be immersed in the stunning ancient landscape. During the three day Country Cabinet visit from 30 April to 2 May 2017, my Cabinet Ministers and I visited communities across the vast APY Lands. We spoke to hundreds of people, met with community leaders and heard from service providers about the key issues facing Anangu. We gained valuable insights into the matters of importance for the whole APY Lands and also those issues impacting individual communities. Anangu told us they want better roads, upgraded community infrastructure and services that are easier to access.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Le@Rning Federation's
    Evaluating The Le@rning Federation’s Online Curriculum Content: A Literacy Educator’s Perspective Keynote address at Curriculum Corporation 13th National Conference, Adelaide, August 2006 Peter Freebody School of Education, University of Queensland 1 Abstract This paper is chiefly concerned with reporting an ongoing evaluation of the use of learning objects provided online by The Le@rning Federation, on the basis of a sample of Australian and New Zealand schools. The paper is framed by considerations that arise from a literacy- education perspective, in particular the need to reshape and reconfigure literacy capabilities throughout the primary and secondary school years within the context of the growing distinctiveness of school subjects. These subjects, and the disciplines that underlie them, make particular demands on text management and production for the growing repertoires of modalities delivered by a range of a relatively new technologies. The significance of The Le@rning Federation's initiatives in delivering learning objects online in a variety of curriculum areas is discussed in this context. Summaries of survey and case study data are presented, which indicate the extent of support for the use of learning objects in relation to students’ engagement in learning and their learning outcomes. As well, results of a preliminary report of a field experiment are presented, showing the effects of the use of learning objects on aspects of students’ performance in mathematics. Acknowledgement Most of the statistical analyses reported here were conducted by Dr Sandy Muspratt who provided substantial input into sections of this presentation. Evaluating The Le@rning Federation’s online curriculum content Page 2 of 22 The curriculum setting One of the significant benefits arising from the application of applied linguistics, sociology and anthropology to literacy education over the last 25 years has been a growing interest in the variety of literacy practices called upon as students move through their years of schooling.
    [Show full text]
  • Judy King Rates A‑To‑E Reporting History: Choose Your Own Adventure
    VOLUMe 5 • nUMBEr 4 • oCTOBER 2006 Professional Educator Judy King rates A-to-E reporting History: choose your own adventure Going bush at Warrego School ‘for the profession’ Join us at www.austcolled.com.au OCTOBER 2006 PROFESSIONAL EDUCATOR ABN 19 004 398 145 ISSN 1447-3607 PRINT POST APPROVED PP 255003/02630 Published for the Australian College of Educators by ACER Press EDITOR Dr Steve Holden [email protected] 03 9835 7466 JOURNALIST Rebecca Leech [email protected] 03 9835 7458 AUSTraLIAN COLLEGE OF EDUcaTOrs 2 EDITORIAL and LETTERS TO THE EDITOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE Prof Neil Dempster, Griffith University Dr Tom Karmel, NCVER 4 OPINION Prof Andrew Gonczi, UTS l Ian Broinowski on the astonishing impact of the Australian Quality Patrick Bourke, Gooseberry Hill PS, WA Training Framework Gail Rienstra, Earnshaw SC, QLD Peter Cole, Education Consultant l Ange Kenos explains why ‘those who can, teach’ Mike Horsley, University of Sydney prODUCTION Lesley Richardson 6 FEATURES [email protected] 03 9835 7470 Colin Baker tells the story behind the story of Warrego School Ralph Schubele [email protected] 03 9835 7469 NATIONAL MEDIA SALES Carolynn Brown 14 RESEARCH [email protected] 03 9835 7468 l StephenBillett reports on research into the use of students’ paid work ACER Press 347 Camberwell Road experiences to help them better understand post-school pathways (Private Bag 55), Camberwell VIC 3124 l Want to stop students who pretend they’re not really cheating? SUBSCRIPTIONS $87.00 4 issues per year BillvonHippelreports on research that may help you do just that Ph 03 9835 7470 Fax 03 9835 7425 [email protected] www.acer.edu.au/professionaleducator 24 THE PROFESSION – A-to-E reports ACE MEMBERSHIP JudyKing rates A-to-E reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia
    “KEEP THAT LANGUAGE GOING!” A Needs-Based Review of the Status of Indigenous Languages in South Australia A consultancy carried out by the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission, South Australia by Patrick McConvell, Rob Amery, Mary-Anne Gale, Christine Nicholls, Jonathan Nicholls, Lester Irabinna Rigney and Simone Ulalka Tur May 2002 Declaration The authors of this report wish to acknowledge that South Australia’s Indigenous communities remain the custodians for all of the Indigenous languages spoken across the length and breadth of this state. Despite enormous pressures and institutionalised opposition, Indigenous communities have refused to abandon their culture and languages. As a result, South Australia is not a storehouse for linguistic relics but remains the home of vital, living languages. The wisdom of South Australia’s Indigenous communities has been and continues to be foundational for all language programs and projects. In carrying out this project, the Research Team has been strengthened and encouraged by the commitment, insight and linguistic pride of South Australia’s Indigenous communities. All of the recommendations contained in this report are premised on the fundamental right of Indigenous Australians to speak, protect, strengthen and reclaim their traditional languages and to pass them on to future generations. * Within this report, the voices of Indigenous respondents appear in italics. In some places, these voices stand apart from the main body of the report, in other places, they are embedded within sentences. The decision to incorporate direct quotations or close paraphrases of Indigenous respondent’s view is recognition of the importance of foregrounding the perspectives and aspirations of Indigenous communities across the state.
    [Show full text]
  • CHILDREN on APY LANDS COMMISSION of INQUIRY 83 Ipartiiii GI Overnment
    CHILDREN ON THE APY LANDS COMMISSION OF INQUIRY IPaIrtI III Government CHILDREN ON APY LANDS COMMISSION OF INQUIRY 83 IPartIIII GI overnment 84 CHILDREN ON APY LANDS COMMISSION OF INQUIRY Chapter 1 A brief history and overview 86 Working party in SA 86 An Inter-Governmental Committee 86 Coronial Inquest 2002 86 Subsequent to the first Inquest 87 The Aboriginal Lands Parliamentary Standing Committee 88 The Aboriginal Lands Task Force 91 Thurtell Report 2005 92 The Department of the Premier and Cabinet 93 The Collins Report 94 O’Donoghue and Costello Report 94 Coronial Inquest 2004 97 Tjungungku Kuranyukutu Palyantjaku 97 Reduction in petrol sniffing 98 TKP Strategic Plan 98 The Service Co-ordinators 99 Report of DPC November 2007 100 Governance 100 Health and Well-being 101 Care and Protection of Children 103 Justice and Community Safety 103 Infrastructure 104 Environment 104 Education 104 Employment and training 105 Community enhancement 105 Commonwealth Government 106 Corrections Facility 107 Summary 107 Chapter 2 Governance in communities 110 CHILDREN ON APY LANDS COMMISSION OF INQUIRY 85 IPartIIII GI overnment Chapter 1 A brief history and overview Before addressing the terms of reference of the It was reported Inquiry, it is appropriate to consider the action of While significant work has begun in the State and Commonwealth Governments to the healing process for Aboriginal communities, problems that have confronted Aboriginal people many Aboriginal people are still dealing with generally and A nangu on the Lands in particular. systemic child abuse and need support and assistance to find ways to express their pain Working party in SA and move on.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge and School Talk: Intellectual Accommodations to Literacy?
    Linguistics and Education 24 (2013) 4–7 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Linguistics and Education jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/linged Knowledge and school talk: Intellectual accommodations to literacy? Peter Freebody Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Available online 8 January 2013 This paper introduces the goals of the research project on which this special issue of Lin- guistics and Education is based. A case is made for considering contemporary education as saturated by and dependent on oral and written language, and on beliefs and practices that Keywords: relate knowledge, talk, reading and writing. The project is directed at a better understanding Literacy of the relationship between oral and written language, and, through collaborations between Knowledge researchers and teachers, at improving practices that encourage learning. This paper frames Classroom interaction the special issue by pointing to a crucial but largely unremarked misalignment – between Assessment teaching and learning via classroom interaction and assessment via individual written per- Lessons formance – that lies at the center of current educational practice. A recognition of that misalignment and its significance for students together call for a theoretical and empirical re-engagement with the relationship between literacy education and knowledge on the part of educational practitioners and researchers. © 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. The problem of literacy is thus partly one of technical skill and the popular acquaintance with what can be done with an alphabet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Literacy: Classrooms, Curriculums, and Assessments
    The politics of literacy: Classrooms, curriculums, and assessments. Peter Freebody Faculty of Education Griffith University Queensland, Australia. ______________________________________________________________ Based on a paper presented to the Literacy strand of the joint Australian and New Zealand Associations for Research in Education, Deakin University, Geelong, November, 1992. Preface This is a paper about literacy research rather than a report of research. Its general purpose is to provide a broad backdrop against which the other papers in this strand may be viewed, and to give some flavour of the activity, diversity, and excitement currently in evidence in literacy research. To address such a broad purpose, the paper presents an argument about literacy research that runs, in very general terms, like this: Many contemporary theories of literacy stress the site-specificity of literacy practices, and seriously question the idea that literacy is a single attribute or a single, specifiable set of criterial skills. Literacy practices that are developed in schooling contexts, therefore, constitute selections of practices. Furthermore, these selections are not accidental, random, or idiosyncratic but rather supportive of the organisational needs of the institution of schooling; thus effort needs to be put into making them appear natural and reflective of essential definitions of literacy. In that sense at least, literacy education and research about it can be viewed as 'political', in that each entails choices among theories and methodologies that afford or reinforce radically differing competencies and ways of engaging in social experience. The paper pursues this argument from the classroom to the curriculum document and to assessment, and finally to the framing of policies and the choices that face educational researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Closing the Gap Implementation Plan
    DRAFT CLOSING THE GAP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Contents Opening statement ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Ministers/Partners responsible ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Working in partnership .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Priority Reforms ............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Priority Reform One: Partnership and shared decision-making ............................................................................................... 12 Priority Reform Two: Building the community-controlled sector ............................................................................................ 20 Priority Reform Three: Transforming government organisations ............................................................................................ 27 Priority Reform Four: Shared access to data and information at a regional level ................................................................... 32 How this Implementation Plan will work in practice ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Boys, Literacy and Schooling
    BOYS, LITERACY AND SCHOOLING EXPANDING THE REPERTOIRES OF PRACTICE Nola Alloway Peter Freebody Pam Gilbert Sandy Muspratt Copies of this report are available from: DEST Clearinghouse School of Cognition Language and Special Education Griffith University Mt Gravatt Campus NATHAN Qld 4111 AUSTRALIA URL: http://www.gu.edu.au/school/cls/clearinghouse/ Printed by J.S. McMillan Printing Group Funding for this research report was provided by the Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training under the Grants for National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies and Projects Programme. © Commonwealth of Australia, 2002 ISBN: 1 86366 542 0 This report is Commonwealth copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source and is not used for commercial use or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those indicated above requires the written permission of the Department of Education, Science and Training. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and copyright may be directed to the Branch Manager, Performance and Targeted Programmes Branch, Schools Group, GPO Box 9880, Canberra City, ACT 2601. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training. CONTENTS Acknowledgements iv 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 INTRODUCTION 12 3 LITERACY, GENDER AND BOYS’ EDUCATION: THE BACKGROUND OF THEORY AND RESEARCH 24 4 SURVEYING TEACHERS AND PARENTS 64 5 OBSERVING AND EXPLAINING BOYS’ LITERACY
    [Show full text]