The Post-Second World War Immigration of the Yugoslav

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Post-Second World War Immigration of the Yugoslav The Post-Second World War Immigration of the Yugoslav Muslims to Turkey (1953-1968) By Nikolina Rajkovic Submitted to Central European University History Department In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Tolga Esmer Second Reader: Professor Tijana Krstic CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2012 “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author.” CEU eTD Collection Abstract In this thesis I study the conjunction of causal factors and motivations informing the emigration of the Muslim communities from the Federal Peoples Republic of Yugoslavia to Turkey in the period from 1953 to 1968. The Muslims who left for Turkey in this period were allowed to leave the Federal Peoples Republic of Yugoslavia according to the agreement on migration signed between Turkey and the Federal Peoples Republic of Yugoslavia in 1953. The migrants were legally categorized as serbest göçmen (free migrants) which meant they were leaving for Turkey on a voluntary basis and this legal status allowed them to settle wherever they want in Turkey receiving no benefits other than citizenship and tax break. My ethnographic research was conducted in Istanbul in 2011, and it is based on ten interviews I gathered from the first generation immigrants who came to Istanbul during the 1950s and 1960s. These oral accounts offer an interesting glimpse into the complexities of reasons and motives for migration and peculiarities of socio-historical context within which migration took place. Whereas the scholarship on this migration largely opts for ideologically- driven explanations and finds the factors for leaving were of a political and religious nature, the interviewee’s significantly challenge and nuance arguments posited in mainstream historiography. CEU eTD Collection Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the kindness, care, hospitality and great stories that the immigrants from Yugoslavia shared with me. Thus, I devote this work to them. I am very grateful to my supervisor, Professor Tolga Esmer who kept encouraging me to engage in this project from the very beginning and whose friendliness and professional support was indeed precious. I would also like to thank my supervisor Professor Tijana Krstic, whom I admire and who provided many constructive comments and support. I would also like to mention how happy I was to be a student of Professor Marsha Siefert who is an incredible person and scholar who gave invaluable comments and criticisms on all of my work in her stimulating classes. I am also grateful to my Professors Selim Deringil and Arzu Ozturkmen for helping me with this research. I am especially thankful to Tulay Tahir for her help in contacting the immigrants. Thank you all! It is pleasure to know all of you. CEU eTD Collection Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter I: Oral History and Migration: Theoretical and Methodological Framework of the Thesis ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Notes on fieldwork ................................................................................................................................. 13 Interviews ............................................................................................................................................... 14 Finding the migrant communities ........................................................................................................... 15 Settings of the interview ......................................................................................................................... 21 My role as researcher .............................................................................................................................. 22 Chapter II: History of the Migration Movements to Turkey from the Former Yugoslav states ............................................................................................................................................. 25 2.1. Migrations in the Late Ottoman Era (1878-1923) ........................................................................... 25 2.2 Migration in the period between 1923 and 1945 .............................................................................. 29 2.3. Migration in the Federal People’s Republic of Yugoslavia (1953-1968) ........................................ 33 Chapter III: Question of Nations and Nationalities in the Federal Peoples’ Republic of Yugoslavia ................................................................................................................................... 37 3.1 The Policy of Nations and Nationalities in the FPRY ...................................................................... 37 3.2 The Policy of Nations and Nationalities in Macedonia .................................................................... 42 Chapter IV: The Settlement and Immigration Policies in a New Turkey: The Early Republican Period (1923-1934) ................................................................................................. 46 Chapter V: Voluntary vs. Compulsory Migration ................................................................. 62 5.1. “We came as free migrants!” ........................................................................................................... 63 5.2. Resentment and Stories of Success ................................................................................................. 69 CEU eTD Collection Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 82 Chapter VI: Reasons and Motives for Migration: Migrant Accounts vs. Historiography on Migration from The Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia to Turkey (1953-1968) ....... 84 Introduction notes ................................................................................................................................... 84 6.1. National and Political Reasons ........................................................................................................ 85 6.2. Economic reasons ............................................................................................................................ 92 6.3. The social and cultural reasons ...................................................................................................... 101 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 112 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 114 Appendices: Questionnaire ...................................................................................................... 120 Bibliography .............................................................................................................................. 121 CEU eTD Collection Introduction My topic addresses the insufficiently explained phenomenon of migration from the Federal Peoples Republic of Yugoslavia to Turkey in the period between 1953 and 1968. In the context of Southeast Europe, m igrations have been a widespread social phenomenon since the early eighteenth century when the Ottoman Empire began its protracted withdrawal from its former European possessions. Episodes of flight and ethnic cleansing recurred throughout the nineteenth century, with the wars for independence of Greece in the 1830s and of the Bulgarian principality in 1878 featuring as important moments of rupture. These dynamics extended throughout the Balkan Wars of 1912-14, the Greco- Turkish War and the consequent Lausanne Exchange of Populations in the 1920s. Every emerging predominately Christian state in the Balkans eventually coerced at least part of its Muslim population to flee the country. These nineteenth - and twentieth-century wars and population exchanges resulted in around one and a half million Muslims being evicted or forced to flee, almost exclusively to Turkey.1 Nevertheless, it must also be emphasized that the rise of competing nationalisms resulted not only in a long-term exodus of Muslim communities from the Balkans to Anatolia but also in even larger Christian communities fleeing in the opposite direction, from Anatolia to Greece, for example. CEU eTD Collection 1 In his book Death and Exile: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ottoman Muslims 1821-1922 American historian Justin McCarthy studies Muslim communities from the Balkans, the northern Caucasus and Russian Armenia who were forced to flee to what is today Turkey. McCarthy argues that between 1821 and 1922 more than five million Muslims were driven from their lands, whereas, five and one half million of Muslims, most of them Turks, were killed in wars or perished as refugees from starvation and disease, see Justin McCarthy, Death and Exile : The Ethnic Cleansing
Recommended publications
  • Emigrants/Muhacir from Xinjiang to Middle East During 1940-60S
    Preface On March 3, 2018, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies held an international workshop to examine modern migratory connections between Xinjiang, a northwest province in China, and the Middle East, especially from the 1940s to 1960s. Following the Republic of China’s defeat in 1949 and the subsequent transfer of the authority over Xinjiang to the People’s Republic of China, several Turkic mi- nority ethnic groups living in the Xinjiang province, mostly Uyghurs and Kazakhs, were forced to migrate to Middle East, particularly to Turkey. This workshop, enti- tled “Emigrants/Muhacir from Central Asia to the Middle East: The Case of Xinjiang (1940s–1950s),” looked to explore the international context of Uyghur and Kazakh migration to the Middle East. Understanding the international dimensions of this topic requires diverse approaches from a variety of regional perspectives, including that of the Soviet Un- ion, the United States, and Taiwan. Thus, the workshop included a number of schol- ars from across the globe. The involvement of a such a diversity of perspectives on issues of Central Asian migration enabled workshop participants to examine ties between Turkic ethnic groups in Turkey and Central Asia, particularly in Xinjiang, from an interdisciplinary perspective. Participation in this workshop by a unique cadre of international scholars furthered existing knowledge of the migratory histo- ries of Turkic migrants from Xinjiang, shedding light on the drivers of migration and the nature of these migrant communities in the Middle East. Together, the re- search presented by workshop participants has held to establish a historical founda- tion of the multiethnic communities living in the Middle East today, providing a necessary foundation from which contemporary instability of Middle East can be further explored.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balkan Entente in Turkish-Yugoslav Relations
    Middle Eastern Studies ISSN: 0026-3206 (Print) 1743-7881 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fmes20 The Balkan Entente in Turkish–Yugoslav relations (1934–41): the Yugoslav perspective Dilek Barlas & Anđelko Vlašić To cite this article: Dilek Barlas & Anđelko Vlašić (2016) The Balkan Entente in Turkish–Yugoslav relations (1934–41): the Yugoslav perspective, Middle Eastern Studies, 52:6, 1011-1024, DOI: 10.1080/00263206.2016.1198328 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2016.1198328 Published online: 18 Aug 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 113 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fmes20 Download by: [Koc University] Date: 16 January 2017, At: 00:18 MIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES, 2016 VOL. 52, NO. 6, 1011À1024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2016.1198328 The Balkan Entente in TurkishÀYugoslav relations (1934À41): the Yugoslav perspective Dilek Barlasa and Anđelko Vlasicb aDepartment of History, Koc¸ University, _Istanbul, Turkey; bCroatian Institute of History, Branch for the History of Slavonia, Syrmia and Baranya, Slavonski Brod, Croatia Most of the works written in Turkey on the formation of the Balkan Entente in 1934 and its effects on the region reflect the Turkish perspective. This perspective intended to glorify the role of Turkey, by emphasizing how Ankara initiated such a pact and was able to con- vince other Balkan countries to participate in its establishment. In other words, the Turkish perspective underlined how Ankara’s policy was driven not by self-interest, but by the interests of all Balkan countries during the formation of the Balkan Entente.1 However, in other Balkan countries, there exist more nuanced views of the Balkan Entente and the Turkish role in its formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Vs. Religious Group Station
    SS7G8 The student will describe the diverse cultures of the people who live in Southwest Asia (Middle East) a. Explain the difference between an ethnic group and a religious group. Ethnic vs. Religious Group Station An ethnic group is a group of people who share cultural ideas and beliefs that have been a part of their community for generations. The characteristics they may have in common could include a language, a religion, a shared history, types of foods, and a set of traditional stories, beliefs, or celebrations. These things make up a common culture shared by those in a particular ethnic group. An example of an ethnic group from Southwest Asia is the Kurds. This group lives in a mountain region that spans Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. Kurds speak Kurdish, and most are Muslim. Kurds do not have their own homeland or government. They are a minority group ruled by the country where they live. Other examples of ethnic groups in the Middle East include Arab and Persian, among others. A religious group shares a belief system in a god or gods, with a specific set of rituals and literature. People from different ethnic groups may share the same religion, though they may be from very different cultures. Religion has been important to the history of Southwest Asia. Christianity, Islam, Judaism were started in this region. People who follow Judaism are called Jews. Followers of Christianity are called Christians. Followers of Islam are called Muslims. 1. What is an ethnic group? 2. What are their characteristics? 3. What are some examples of ethnic groups? 4.
    [Show full text]
  • France and the Dissolution of Yugoslavia Christopher David Jones, MA, BA (Hons.)
    France and the Dissolution of Yugoslavia Christopher David Jones, MA, BA (Hons.) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of History August 2015 © “This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution.” Abstract This thesis examines French relations with Yugoslavia in the twentieth century and its response to the federal republic’s dissolution in the 1990s. In doing so it contributes to studies of post-Cold War international politics and international diplomacy during the Yugoslav Wars. It utilises a wide-range of source materials, including: archival documents, interviews, memoirs, newspaper articles and speeches. Many contemporary commentators on French policy towards Yugoslavia believed that the Mitterrand administration’s approach was anachronistic, based upon a fear of a resurgent and newly reunified Germany and an historical friendship with Serbia; this narrative has hitherto remained largely unchallenged. Whilst history did weigh heavily on Mitterrand’s perceptions of the conflicts in Yugoslavia, this thesis argues that France’s Yugoslav policy was more the logical outcome of longer-term trends in French and Mitterrandienne foreign policy. Furthermore, it reflected a determined effort by France to ensure that its long-established preferences for post-Cold War security were at the forefront of European and international politics; its strong position in all significant international multilateral institutions provided an important platform to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • A THREAT to "STABILITY" Human Rights Violations in Macedonia
    Macedoni Page 1 of 10 A THREAT TO "STABILITY" Human Rights Violations in Macedonia Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch Copyright © June 1996 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN: 1-56432-170-3 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 96-77111 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was researched and written by Fred Abrahams, a consultant to Human Rights Watch/Helsinki. It is based primarily on a mission to Macedonia conducted in July and August 1995. During that time, Human Rights Watch/Helsinki spoke with dozens of people from all ethnic groups and political persuasions. Extensive interviews were conducted throughout the country with members of government, leaders of the ethnic communities, human rights activists, diplomats, journalists, lawyers, prison inmates and students. The report was edited by Jeri Laber, Senior Advisor to Human Rights Watch/Helsinki. Anne Kuper provided production assistance. Human Rights Watch/Helsinki would like to thank the many people in Macedonia and elsewhere who assisted in the preparation of this report, especially those who took the time to read early drafts. Thanks also go to those members of the Macedonian government who helped by organizing a prison visit, providing information or granting lengthy interviews. I. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Macedonia faces difficulties on several fronts. As a former member of the Yugoslav federation, the young republic is in a transition from communism in which it must decentralize its economy, construct democratic institutions and revitalize its civil society. These tasks, demanding under any circumstances, have been made more difficult by Macedonia's proximity to the war in Bosnia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia to War, to Dayton, and to Its Slow Peace – European Council On
    REPORT BOSNIA TO WAR, TO DAYTON, AND TO ITS SLOW PEACE Carl Bildt January 2021 SUMMARY The international community was gravely unprepared for the conflicts that followed the dissolution of Yugoslavia. In particular, it neglected the challenge of Bosnia. Europe alone was not enough to bring peace, and the United States went from disinterested to disruptive and finally to decisive for a credible peace process. Russia in those days was a constructive actor. The war in Bosnia lasted years longer than it should have more because of the divisions between outside powers than because of the divisions within the country and the region itself. The fundamentals of the Dayton Agreement in 1995 were not too dissimilar from what had been discussed, but not pursued, prior to the outbreak of the war. It is a solution that is closer to the reality of Belgium than to the reality of Cyprus. After the war, many political leaders in Bosnia saw peace as the continuation of the war by other means, which has seriously hampered economic and social progress. Ultimately, it will be difficult to sustain progress for Bosnia or the region without a credible and clear EU accession process. INTRODUCTION It was a quarter of a century ago that the most painful conflict on European soil since the second world war came to an end. Peace agreements are rare birds. Most conflicts end either with the victory of one of the sides or some sort of ceasefire that is rarely followed by a true peace agreement. The map of Europe shows a number of such ‘frozen conflicts’.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Social Vulnerability Using Geographic Information Systems: Pendik, Istanbul Case Study
    Assessment of Social Vulnerability Using Geographic Information Systems: Pendik, Istanbul Case Study Zeynep Haki, Zuhal Akyürek, Şebnem Düzgün Middle East Technical University, Natural and Applied Sciences, Geodetic and Geographic Information Technologies 06531- Ankara, Turkey [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] SUMMARY This study aims to develop a methodology to define vulnerable groups in terms of their social conditions for any possible hazard, with Geographical Information Systems (GIS) technology, in the case study area of earthquake-prone Pendik, Istanbul. In the calculation of social vulnerability certain indicators were estimated and used as criterion data. Criterion standardization, weighting and combining were accomplished by means of multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) methods, the theoretical background being based on the multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT). In order to avoid the subjectivity of the assessment, 10 more evaluations are utilized. The results show that, the income- and educational-level indicators are the most important factors in defining the social vulnerability. These outputs are supported with some explorative spatial data analyses to understand global trends and spatial interactions in order to be used in pre- and post-disaster planning. Besides, to determine the physical effects of basic services and transportation, some GIS Analyses are applied. The objectivity of the assessment and the complicated structure of the study data are discussed for an effective disaster management. The main outcomes of the methodology and its applications show that, the southwest part of Pendik is socially vulnerable to any possible hazard. KEYWORDS: Social Vulnerability Assessment, Pre- and Post-Disaster Planning, Disaster Management, Spatial Data Analysis, GIS, Pendik-İstanbul INTRODUCTION Natural hazards are the reality of today’s world, which considerably affect people’s living conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina - How Much Did Islam Matter ? Xavier Bougarel
    Bosnia-Herzegovina - How Much Did Islam Matter ? Xavier Bougarel To cite this version: Xavier Bougarel. Bosnia-Herzegovina - How Much Did Islam Matter ?. Journal of Modern European History, Munich : C.H. Beck, London : SAGE 2018, XVI, pp.164 - 168. 10.17104/1611-8944-2018-2- 164. halshs-02546552 HAL Id: halshs-02546552 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02546552 Submitted on 18 Apr 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 « Bosnia-Herzegovina – How Much Did Islam Matter ? », Journal of Modern European History, vol. XVI, n° 2, 2018, pp.164-168. Xavier Bougarel The Bosniaks, both victims and actors in the Yugoslav crisis Referred to as ‘Muslims’ (in the national meaning of the term) until 1993, the Bosniaks were the main victims of the breakup of Yugoslavia. During the war that raged in Bosnia- Herzegovina from April 1992 until December 1995, 97,000 people were killed: 65.9% of them were Bosniaks, 25.6% Serbs and 8.0% Croats. Of the 40,000 civilian victims, 83.3% were Bosniaks. Moreover, the Bosniaks represented the majority of the 2.1 million people displaced by wartime combat and by the ‘ethnic cleansing’ perpetrated by the ‘Republika Srpska’ (‘Serb Republic’) and, on a smaller scale, the ‘Croat Republic of Herceg-Bosna’.
    [Show full text]
  • PENDIK MUNICIPALITY | Erasmus+ Projects
    PENDIK MUNICIPALITY | Erasmus+ Projects The Organisation Erasmus+ Projects in last three years Legal Name Pendik Belediyesi EU Program Year Project ID Applicant / Beneficiary Legal Name (EN) Pendik Municipality Erasmus+ 2017 2017-1-TR01-KA105-044661 Pendik Municipality Address Yeni Mah. Stadyum Sk. No:18 34893 Pendik – Istanbul Erasmus+ 2017 2017-2-TR01-KA105-047556 Pendik Municipality City Istanbul Erasmus+ 2017 2017-2-TR01-KA105-047587 Pendik Municipality Country Turkey Erasmus+ 2017 2017-3-TR01-KA105-048383 Pendik Municipality Website Www.pendik.bel.tr Erasmus+ 2018 2018-3-TR01-KA347-061747 Pendik Municipality E-mail [email protected] Erasmus+ 2018 2018-3-RO01-KA105-061290 Asociatia Be You Phone +90 216 585 11 66 Erasmus+ 2019 2019-1-HU01-KA104-060383 Jó munka szociális szövetkezet Fax +90 216 585 14 86 Erasmus+ 2019 2019-1-TR01-ESC11-065100 Pendik Municipality Type Local Public Body Erasmus+ 2019 2019-1-TR01-KA204-074520 Pendik Municipality Accreditation ESC Erasmus+ 2019 6132019-EPP-1-2019-1-TR-SPO-SSCP Pendik Municipality The LEAR Rüveyda Güzel graduated from Selçuk University International Relations BA degree. She has been working as project specialist since 2012 and leading Project Managemant Unit. Title Mr. She has experience in preparing, implementing, and managing different projects both at Name & Surname Abdulkadir COŞKUN national and international level. She is the coordinator of latest E+ Sport project as well. Position Strategy Development Manager Sümeyye Topal gained her BA from Istanbul Bilgi University – Public Relations and her Phone & Fax +90 216 585 11 00 +90 216 585 14 86 MA Gebze Technical University on Project Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Milli Mücadele Döneminde Mehmet Akif Ve Islamcilik*
    Turkish Studies - International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 9/12 Fall 2014, p. 563-572, ANKARA-TURKEY MİLLİ MÜCADELE DÖNEMİNDE MEHMET AKİF VE İSLAMCILIK* Emin OBA** Dinçer ÖZTÜRK** Hulisi GÜRBÜZ** ÖZET Mehmet Akif Ersoy edebi kişiliği, ahlakı ve yaşam tarzı ile örnek bir insan modelidir. İstiklal Marşı şairi olarak da bilinen Akif, Türk halkının gönlünde taht kurmuştur. Sadece Türkiye’deki Türklerin değil, diğer coğrafyalarda yaşayan Türklerinde gönlünü fethetmiş, sevgisini kazanmıştır. Çalışmamızda, Mehmet Akif’in İslamcılık fikirleri ve faaliyetleri hakkında bilgi verilmeye çalışılmıştır. Akif’in İslamcılık fikri için yaptıklarına değinilmiştir. Onun İslamcılık anlayışı ve beklentilerinin neler olduğu ve bu beklentileri gerçekleştirmek için yaptığı çalışmalar dikkate alınmıştır. Akif halkı, Asr-ı Saadet zamanındaki İslam yaşamı gibi, bir hayatın yaşanması gerektiği fikrini savunmuştur. Bunu vaazlarında dile getirmiştir. Burada Akif’in daha çok Anadolu’da verdiği vaazlara dikkat çekilmek istenmiştir (Kastamonu Nasrullah Camii Vaazı, Balıkesir Zağanos Paşa Camii Vaazı gibi). Mehmet Akif’in Milli Mücadele’deki faaliyetleri ve fikirleri verilmeye çalışılmıştır. Akif, Müslüman toplumların, Gayr-ı Müslim toplumların boyunduruğu altında yaşayamayacağı fikrini savunmuştur. Osmanlı devletinin yıkılma sürecine girmesinden dolayı, imparatorluğun bünyesinde yaşayan devletlerin kendi kaderinin tayin etmesi gerektiği fikrini savunarak, Milli Mücadeleye her alanda destek vermiştir. Bu doğrultuda Anadolu’nun çeşitli yerlerinde vaazlar vermiş, halkın milli mücadeleye destek vermelerini istemiştir. Ayrıca, çalışmamızda Akif’in Sebilü’r-reşad ve Sırat-ı Müstakim’deki konumu hakkında bilgilere de yer verilmiştir. Akif, bu mecmualar aracılığıyla Milli Mücadeleyi eserleriyle desteklemiştir. Akif’in siyasi yönü üzerinde de durulmuştur. O siyasetin her türlüsünden kaçınmıştır, daha ileri giderek siyaset kelimesinden bile uzak durmuştur. Siyasetten Allah’a sığınmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Evanthis Hatzivassiliou Greek-Yugoslav Relations Is A
    Evanthis Hatzivassiliou From Adversity to Alliance: Greece, Yugoslavia and Balkan Strategy, 1944-1959 Greek-Yugoslav relations is a subject of pivotal importance for understanding the shaping of twentieth century Balkan balances. In the post-war period this relationship became even more interesting: Greece and Yugoslavia had radically different political, economic and social systems; they were bitterly divided in 1944-1948, but then they norma­ lized relations, participated in a Balkan alliance together with Turkey, and when this alliance broke down, they continued their co-operation on a bilateral basis. In this paper it will be argued that the factor which divi­ ded Greece and Yugoslavia in 1944-1948 was not ideology, but strate­ gy; and it was strategy that brought them closer after Tito’s split with Stalin. After 1948 both countries shaped their policy on the basis of a mild realism, and their relationship was dominated by their perception of their respective national interests. In this paper, emphasis will be placed on Greek perceptions and assessments, but Yugoslav views will also be mentioned. I During the inter-war period Greece’s major problem with Yugo­ slavia derived from the latter’s great size: Belgrade was a powerful neighbour, capable of pressing Athens and of attracting support from the great powers, mainly France. At that time Greece was afraid of Yugo­ slavia’s hegemonist tendencies in the Balkans, as well as of its desire to pose as the protector of the Slav-speaking minority of Greece and as a suitor for the port of Thessaloniki. It was clear that, facing Bulgarian revisionism, it would be impossible for Athens to resist pressures from both its northern neighbours; this was why the possibility of a Bulgarian- Yugoslav rapprochement was the nightmare scenario of the Athens policy-makers'.
    [Show full text]
  • Mehmet Akif Ersoy 4 Enes Talha Tüfekçi
    Mehmet Akif’in Mısır ve Almanya Günleri Dosya Editörleri: Mehmet Cemal Çollak Enes Talha Tüfekçi 1 İçindekiler Sahici ve Samimi Bir Hayatın Şairi: Mehmet Akif Ersoy 4 Enes Talha Tüfekçi Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nda Osmanlı- Alman İttifakı ve Mehmed Âkif’in Almanya’ya 5 Gidişi Dr. Kadir Kon Berlin’de Bir Millî Şair: Mehmet Âkif Ersoy 14 Nazım Elmas Mehmet Âkif Ersoy’un Almanya Günlerinin Edebî Eserleri Üzerindeki Tesiri 22 Hüseyin Taş Mehmet Akif’in Mısır’daki Çalışmaları ve Kültürel Çevresi 29 Tahsin Deliçay/ Es-Safsafy Ahmed El-Katory Mehmet Âkif Ersoy’un Mısır Günleri ve Mısır’da Türkçe Öğretirken Yaşadığı 40 Zorluk Necmettin Özmen Mısırlı Edip Abdulvehhâb Azzâm’ın Kaleminden Mehmet Âkif 47 Tahsin Deliçay SAHİCİ VE SAMİMİ BİR HAYATIN ŞAİRİ: MEHMET AKİF ERSOY Enes Talha Tüfekçi “Vatanından uzakta Mısır ve Almanya’da zor günler geçiren Mehmet Akif Ersoy, yaşadığı hayatla sanatı arasında bir ünsiyet kurmuştur” Mehmet Akif Ersoy, 20 Aralık 1873’te dünyaya altına girmiştir. Mısır günlerinde hastalıkları gelmiş ve 27 Aralık 1936’da vefat etmiştir. Dolu dolu, nüksetmiş ve 1930’lı yılların ortasından sonra ileri sınanmış ve sahici bir hayat yaşamıştır. Altmış üç bir seviyeye gelmiştir. Vatanından uzakta ölmemek senelik ömründe savaşlar, zor görevler, gönüllü için tekrardan vatanına dönmüş ve aldığı tedaviler sürgünler, yoksulluklar ve haksızlıklar yaşamıştır. de işe yaramamıştır. Kaderin cilvesi ki Mısır’daki Fakat her ne olursa olsun, değerlerinden ve günlerinden sonra İstanbul’da Mısır Apartmanında şahsiyetinden yana taviz vermemiştir. Samimi ve son günlerini geçirmiştir ve 27 Aralık 1936 günü sahici bir şahsiyeti hep korumuştur. Atacağı adımın vefat etmiştir. Bu çalışmada Akif’in Mısır’da geçirdiği sonucunun yoksulluk, özlem, acı getireceğini bilse günleri mercek altına alan ve ölümüne kadar geçen de o adımın doğru ve hakça bir adım olması onun süreci işleyen çalışmalar da görsel malzemelerle için yetmiştir.
    [Show full text]