Mandatory Malpractice Insurance Task Force
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Formal Opinion
· :. - FORMAL ETHICS OPINION NO. 127 The Idaho State Bar Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility has been requested to render an opinion concerning the propriety of a J.a1Al'yer placing telephone calls to residents of the lawyer's area of practice, selected at random, as a follow up to an advertisement distributed to the public at large. The advertisement says in part: H$25.00 cash if we call your number and you can answer two questions about this page. We will make random callsH. The specific question is whether placing the random calls would violate the Idaho Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 7.3 of the Idaho Rules of Professional Conduct is controlling: Direct contact with Prospective Clients A lawyer may not solicit professional employment from a prospective client with whom the lawyer has no family or prior professional relationship, by mail, in-person or otherwise, when a significant motive for the lawyer's doing so is the lawyer's pecuniary gain. The term HsolicitH includes contact in person, by telephone or telegraph, by letter or other writing, or by other communication directed to a specific recipient, but does not include letters addressed or advertising circulars distributed generally to persons not known to need legal services of the kind provided by the lawyer in a particular matter, but who are so situated that they might in general find such services useful. ETHICS OPINION - 1 The Supreme Court of the united States held, in Ohralik vs. Ohio State Bar Association, 436 U.S. 447 (1978), that a State may categorically ban in-person solicitation by lawyers for pecuniary gain. -
Introduction
INTRODUCTION Nationally, approximately 40% of new attorneys work at firms consisting of more than 50 lawyers. Therefore, a large percentage of practicing attorneys work for small firms (fewer than 50 attorneys). Small firms generally do not have formalized recruiting procedures or a set “hiring season” when they recruit summer law clerks, school-year law clerks, or entry-level attorneys. Instead, these firms hire on an as-needed basis, and they hire year round. To secure employment with a small firm, students and lawyers alike need to be proactive in getting their name and interests out in the community. Applicants should not only apply directly to these firms, but they should connect via law school, community, and bar association activities. In this directory, you will find state-by-state hyperlinks to regional directories, bar associations, newspapers, and job banks that can be used to jump-start a small firm search. ALABAMA State/Regional Bar Associations Alabama Bar Association: http://www.alabar.org Birmingham Bar Association: http://www.birminghambar.org Mobile Bar Association: http://www.mobilebar.org Specialty Bar Associations Alabama Defense Lawyers Association: http://www.adla.org Alabama Trial Lawyers Association: http://www.alabamajustice.org Major Newspapers Birmingham News: http://www.al.com/birmingham Mobile Register: http://www.al.com/mobile Legal & Non-Legal Resources & Publications State Lawyers.com: http://alabama.statelawyers.com EINNEWS: http://www.einnews.com/alabama Birmingham Business Journal: http://birmingham.bizjournals.com -
US Guide to Bar Admission Requirements, 2016
Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements 2016 NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR EXAMINERS AND AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF LEGAL EDUCATION AND ADMISSIONS TO THE BAR National Conference of Bar Examiners Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements 2016 NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR EXAMINERS AND AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF LEGAL EDUCATION AND ADMISSIONS TO THE BAR National Conference of Bar Examiners EDITORS ERICA MOESER CLAIRE J. GUBACK This publication represents the joint work product of the National Conference of Bar Examiners and the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar. The views expressed herein have not been approved by the House of Delegates or the Board of Governors of the American Bar Association, nor has such approval been sought. Accordingly, these materials should not be construed as representing the policy of the American Bar Association. National Conference of Bar Examiners 302 South Bedford Street, Madison, WI 53703-3622 608-280-8550 • TDD 608-661-1275 • Fax 608-280-8552 www.ncbex.org Chair: Hon. Thomas J. Bice, Fort Dodge, IA President: Erica Moeser, Madison, WI Immediate Past Chair: Bryan R. Williams, New York, NY Chair-Elect: Robert A. Chong, Honolulu, HI Secretary: Hon. Rebecca White Berch, Phoenix, AZ Board of Trustees: Hulett H. Askew, Atlanta, GA Patrick R. Dixon, Newport Beach, CA Michele A. Gavagni, Tallahassee, FL Gordon J. MacDonald, Manchester, NH Hon. Cynthia L. Martin, Kansas City, MO Suzanne K. Richards, Columbus, OH Hon. Phyllis D. Thompson, Washington, DC Timothy Y. Wong, St. Paul, MN ABA House of Delegates Representative: Hulett H. Askew, Atlanta, GA American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar 321 North Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-7598 312-988-6738 • Fax 312-988-5681 www.americanbar.org/legaled Chair: Hon. -
Model Guideline for the Utilization of Legal Assistant
Model Guidelines For The Utilization Of Legal Assistant Services The following advisory guidelines were adopted by the Idaho State Bar membership during the 1992 resolution process. These guidelines are an attempt to identify the proper role of a legal assistant, and to define the lawyer’s supervisory role. Because the Model Guidelines are advisory only, they do not conflict with the Idaho Rules of Professional Conduct. There are 10 guidelines, covering a lawyer’s supervisory and training responsibilities, the permissible scope of delegation, how legal assistants are held out to clients, the courts and the public, and guidelines for the billing of a legal assistant’s time. Preamble assistant’s education, training, and experience, and for ensuring that the legal assistant is familiar with the responsibilities of attorneys and legal assistants under the State courts, bar associations, or bar committees in at least 4 seventeen states have prepared recommendations1 for the applicable rules governing professional conduct. utilization of legal assistant services.2 While their content Under principles of agency law and rules governing the varies, their purpose appears uniform: to provide lawyers conduct of attorneys, lawyers are responsible for the actions and the work product of the non-lawyers they employ. Rule with a reliable basis for delegating responsibility for 5 performing a portion of the lawyer’s tasks to legal assistants. 5.3 of the Model Rules requires that partners and supervising The purpose of preparing model guidelines is not to contradict attorneys ensure that the conduct of non-lawyer assistants is the guidelines already adopted or to suggest that other compatible with the lawyer’s professional obligations. -
The Ethical Oregon Lawyer 2006 Revision
Completely revised! The Ethical Oregon Lawyer 2006 Revision Your #1 go-to desk reference for ethics questions and answers . now includes discussions about Oregon’s new Rules of Professional Conduct and the RPCs of Washington, Idaho, and Utah. No matter what your practice area, you need to follow the disciplinary rules—for yourself and for your clients. But you often have questions about how to do that. And with the recent change from the old DRs to the new Oregon RPCs, you may wonder if the answers you knew have changed. The Ethical Oregon Lawyer is the best source for answers to these ethics questions, and more: How are attorney fees governed? What constitutes competent representation? What sanctions are available in appellate court? Who is the client for an insurance defense lawyer? What constitutes an ex parte contact in a pending case? Who holds the lawyer-client privilege in the corporate context? What limitations do lawyers face when advertising their services? What rights does an accused lawyer have in a disciplinary hearing? When does a lawyer’s self-interest conflict with the client’s interests? How do the new Oregon RPCs affect a lawyer’s duty of confidentiality? Under what circumstances may a lawyer ethically withdraw from a case? What ethical limits are placed on a lawyer in negotiating on a client’s behalf? How do you avoid ethical conflicts when managing, organizing, or selling a law firm? What ethical issues arise when you hire a mental health professional to assess your client’s mental capacity? May a lawyer represent a current client whose interests conflict with those of a former client? Plus, each chapter highlights the major differences between Oregon’s Rules of Professional Conduct and the RPCs of Washington, Utah, and Idaho. -
1 No. 19-35463 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
(1 of 41) Case: 19-35463, 11/13/2019, ID: 11498160, DktEntry: 30-1, Page 1 of 2 No. 19-35463 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ________________ DANIEL Z. CROWE, OREGON CIVIL LIBERTIES ATTORNEYS; AND LAWRENCE K. PETERSON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE BAR OF OREGON, Defendant-Appellee, _______________________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Portland Division Case No. 3:18-cv-02139-JR Honorable Michael H. Simon MOTION OF STATE BAR OF ARIZONA FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF SUPPORTING APPELLEE Mary R. O’Grady Kimberly Friday OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. 2929 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 640-9000 [email protected] Attorneys for State Bar of Arizona 1 (2 of 41) Case: 19-35463, 11/13/2019, ID: 11498160, DktEntry: 30-1, Page 2 of 2 The State Bar of Arizona (“Arizona”) moves for leave to file an amicus brief supporting the State Bar of Oregon in this case. The proposed brief is filed with this motion. The State Bar of Oregon consents to Arizona filing this brief. Appellants oppose the filing of this brief. Arizona has an interest in the court’s decision in this case because Arizona, like Oregon, has an integrated bar in which membership is required. The amicus brief will provide information on state bars in jurisdictions other than Oregon to provide the Court with a broader perspective on the varied systems for regulating the practice of law. Because of the potentially broad impact of the court’s decision, information on other state bars should be useful to the court. -
Information and Instructions Booklet
APPLICATION INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS RECIPROCITY ADMISSION OF LAWYERS LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN ALASKA , IDAHO , UTAH AND WASHINGTON OREGON STATE BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS 16037 SW UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD PO BOX 231935 TIGARD , OR 97281-1935 (503) 620-0222, EXTS . 310, 311, 316, AND 419 WWW .OSBAR .ORG RECIPROCITY ADMISSION Rule 15.05 - Rules for Admission of Attorneys of the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon Admission of Lawyers Licensed to Practice Law in Alaska, Idaho, Utah and Washington I M P O R T A N T APPLICATION INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS PAGE APPLICATION FILING ADDRESS.................................................................................................... 1 APPLICATION FILING DEADLINE .................................................................................................. 1 ITEMS TO BE FILED.......................................................................................................................... 1 FILING FEES..................................................................................................................................... 4 APPLICATION WITHDRAWAL AND PARTIAL FEE REFUND .......................................................... 4 PUBLICATION OF APPLICANT NAMES ........................................................................................ 4 CHARACTER AND FITNESS ............................................................................................................ 4 CHANGE OF ADDRESS................................................................................................................. -
State Emeritus Pro Bono Practice Rules Updated May 2019
State Emeritus Pro Bono Practice Rules Updated May 2019 American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging David Godfrey Senior Attorney [email protected] Emeritus pro bono practice rules encourage retired and inactive attorneys to volunteer to provide pro bono assistance to clients unable to pay for essential legal representation. Currently 44 jurisdictions have adopted emeritus pro bono rules waiving some of the normal licensing requirement for attorneys agreeing to limit their practice to volunteer service. The following chart contains essential details of the current rules. For more information see: Performance Data on Emeritus Pro Bono Practice Rules http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/law_aging/EmeritusAttorneyProBonoPracticeRulesProjectReport.authchec kdam.pdf Emeritus Attorney Programs: Best Practices and Lessons Learned http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/law_aging/emeritus_best_practices_9_27.authcheckdam.pdf State Emeritus Pro Bono Practice Rules Attorneys Required to Eligible Out-of- Work with a Malpractice Years of Dues Direct State Age (Retired, State MCLE Certified Insurance Practice Waived Supervision Contact (Adopted/Amended) Restriction Inactive, License Waived Legal Mentioned Required Required Other) Allowed Services in the Rule Program Alabama (2008) None None Inactive No Reduced No Yes No No Linda L. Lund, Director Rule 6.6 Volunteer Lawyers Program Alabama State Bar P. O. Box 671 Montgomery, Alabama 36101 Alaska (2007) None None Retired or No Waived n/a Yes No Yes program Krista Scully Bar Rule 43.2 inactive must Pro Bono Director disclose Alaska Bar Association coverage Arizona (2009) (2012) None At least 5 Retired, Yes Reduced Waived Yes Yes Yes (must Kim Bernhart A.R.S. -
Continuing Legal Education: What’S Required and Opportunities for Members and Staff to Satisfy Those Requirements
Legal Sidebari Continuing Legal Education: What’s Required and Opportunities for Members and Staff to Satisfy Those Requirements Updated March 25, 2019 As members of the self-regulated legal profession, attorneys are required, under the rules of their state bars, to maintain competence in their legal knowledge and skill. These rules apply to preserve the integrity of the profession and ensure that attorneys—who represent clients as officers of the legal system—uphold their “special responsibility for the quality of justice” under that system. To fulfill the duty of competence, most jurisdictions, though not all, have adopted mandatory continuing legal education (MCLE) requirements. This Sidebar provides an overview of the states’ various MCLE requirements, discussing how each state varies in their approach to ensuring that attorneys maintain the requisite knowledge and skill to maintain professional competence. The Sidebar concludes by providing details on the Federal Law Update (FLU), a series of CRS legal seminars that will be held the first two weeks of April 2019 and may be eligible for Continuing Legal Education credits. The American Bar Association (ABA) has described the continuing education requirement as follows: To maintain public confidence in the legal profession and the rule of law, and to promote the fair administration of justice, it is essential that lawyers be competent regarding the law, legal and practice-oriented skills, the standards and ethical obligations of the legal profession, and the management of their practices. In 2017, the ABA amended its Model Rule for MCLE credits, setting an example for licensing jurisdictions to use. The MCLE Model Rule requires an average of 15 credit hours per year over the course of the reporting period. -
State CLE Contact Information State Contact/Phone Address
State CLE Contact Information State Contact/Phone Address Alabama Alabama State Bar MCLE Alabama State Bar MCLE (334) 269-1515 P.O. Box 671 (334) 261-6310 (fax) Montgomery, AL https://www.alabar.org/cle/ 36101 Alaska Alaska State Bar Association Alaska State Bar Association (907) 272-7469 P.O. Box 100279 (907) 272-2932 (fax) Anchorage, AK [email protected] 99510 https://alaskabar.org/cle-mcle/cle-provider- information/ Arizona State Bar of Arizona - CLE State Bar of Arizona - CLE 602.340.7328 4201 N. 24th Street [email protected] Phoenix, AZ www.azbar.org/CLE/ 85016 Arkansas Arkansas CLE Board Arkansas CLE Board (501) 374-1855 2100 Riverfront Drive, Suite 110 (501) 374-1853 (fax) Little Rock, AR https://www.arcourts.gov/administration/prof 72202 essional-programs/cle/out-state California State Bar of California, MCLE Program State Bar of California, MCLE Program (415) 538-2126 180 Howard Street [email protected] San Francisco, CA www.calbar.ca.gov 94105 Colorado Colorado Supreme Court State of Colorado Supreme Court Board of Cont. Legal and Judicial Education Office of Cont. Legal and Judicial (303) 928-7771 Education [email protected] 1300 Broadway, Suite 510 https://coloradosupremecourt.com/Current% Denver, CO 80203 20Lawyers/Cle.asp Connecticut Connecticut Judicial Branch, Minimum Connecticut Judicial Branch, Minimum Continuing Legal Education Continuing Legal Education [email protected] 90 Washington Street, 3rd Floor https://www.jud.ct.gov/MCLE/ Hartford, CT 06106 Delaware Commission on CLE of the Supreme Court of Commission on CLE of the Supreme Delaware Court of Delaware (302) 651-3941 The Renaissance Center Margot Millar 405 North King Street, Suite 420 [email protected] Wilmington, DE https://courts.delaware.gov/cle/ 19801 District of The District of Columbia Bar The District of Columbia Bar Columbia (202) 626-3488 901 4th Street, NW Dennis P. -
State CLE Contact Information State Contact/Phone Address Alabama
State CLE Contact Information State Contact/Phone Address Alabama Alabama State Bar MCLE Alabama State Bar MCLE (334) 269-1515 P.O. Box 671 (334) 261-6310 (fax) Montgomery, AL https://www.alabar.org/cle/ 36101 Alaska Alaska State Bar Association Alaska State Bar Association (907) 272-7469 840 K Street, Suite 100 (907) 272-2932 (fax) P.O. Box 100279 [email protected] Anchorage, AK https://alaskabar.org/cle-mcle/cle-provider- 99501 information/ Arizona State Bar of Arizona - CLE State Bar of Arizona - CLE (602) 252-4804 4201 N. 24th Street, Suite 100 (602) 271-4930 (fax) Phoenix, AZ [email protected] 85016 www.azbar.org/CLE/ Arkansas Arkansas CLE Board Arkansas CLE Board (501) 374-1855 2100 Riverfront Drive, Suite 110 (501) 374-1853 (fax) Little Rock, AR https://www.arcourts.gov/administration/prof 72202 essional-programs/cle/out-state California State Bar of California, MCLE Program State Bar of California, MCLE Program (888) 800-3400 180 Howard Street [email protected] San Francisco, CA www.calbar.ca.gov/Attorneys/MCLE-CLE 94105 Colorado Colorado Supreme Court Ralph L. Carr Judicial Center Board of Cont. Legal and Judicial Education Colorado Supreme Court (303) 928-7771 Board of Cont. Legal and Judicial [email protected] Education http://www.coloradosupremecourt.com/Curre 1300 Broadway, Suite 510 nt%20Lawyers/Cle.asp# Denver, CO 80203 Connecticut Connecticut Judicial Branch MCLE Connecticut Judicial Branch MCLE (860) 223-4400 Connecticut Center for Judicial (860) 223-4488 (fax) Education [email protected] 90 Washington Street, 3rd Floor https://www.jud.ct.gov/mcle/default.htm Hartford, CT 06106 Delaware Commission on CLE of the Supreme Court of Commission on CLE of the Supreme Delaware Court of Delaware (302) 651-3941 The Renaissance Center Margot Millar 405 North King Street, Suite 420 [email protected] Wilmington, DE https://courts.delaware.gov/cle/ 19801 District of The District of Columbia Bar The District of Columbia Bar Columbia (202) 737-4700 901 4th Street, NW Dennis P. -
NCBE Bar Admissions Guide
Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements 2020 National Conference of Bar Examiners American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar l National Conference of 'IlI!. Bar Examiners Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements 2020 National Conference of Bar Examiners American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar National M!!A. a Conference of AMERICANBARASSOCIATION l Legal Education and Bar Examiners I . Admissions to the Bar Editors Judith A. Gundersen Claire J. Guback This publication represents the joint work product of the National Conference of Bar Examiners and the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar. The views expressed herein have not been approved by the House of Delegates or the Board of Governors of the American Bar Association, nor has such approval been sought. Accordingly, these materials should not be construed as representing the policy of the American Bar Association. National Conference of Bar Examiners 302 South Bedford Street, Madison, WI 53703-3622 608-280-8550 • TDD 608-661-1275 • Fax 608-280-8552 www.ncbex.org Chair: Hon. Cynthia L. Martin, Kansas City, MO President: Judith A. Gundersen, Madison, WI Immediate Past Chair: Michele A. Gavagni, Tallahassee, FL Chair-Elect: Hulet H. Askew, Atlanta, GA Secretary: Suzanne K. Richards, Columbus, OH Board of Trustees: Patrick R. Dixon, Newport Beach, CA John J. McAlary, Albany, NY Augustin Rivera, Jr., Corpus Christi, TX Darin B. Scheer, Casper, WY Anthony R. Simon, Jackson, MS Hon. Phyllis D. Thompson, Washington, DC Hon. Ann A. Scot Timmer, Phoenix, AZ Timothy Y.