DOCSLIB.ORG

Microbiological Water Quality of the River Danube (Km 2581 - Km 15): Longitudinal Variation of Pollution As Determined by Standard Parameters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Microbiological Water Quality of the River Danube (Km 2581 - Km 15): Longitudinal Variation of Pollution As Determined by Standard Parameters Microbiological water quality of the River Danube (km 2581 - km 15): Longitudinal variation of pollution as determined by standard parameters Gerhard G. Kavka1, Georg D. Kasimir2, and Andreas H. Farnleitner3 Keywords: Microbiological water quality, Large Rivers, faecal pollution Introduction The examination of microbiological river water quality according to technical standards is obligatory for use-related aspects such as for drinking water production, irrigation or recrea- tion. Microbiological data for total coliforms, faecal coliforms (representing Escherichia coli as predominant species), intestinal enterococci (faecal streptococci) and heterotrophic plate count (colony count) were collected during the Joint Danube Survey (JDS) 2001, organised by the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR), along the longitudinal stretch of the River Danube from the upper section (km 2581) to the Black Sea and in major tributaries. Data were used for the assessment of microbial pollution along the course of this large river and to establish a microbiological water quality map of the investi- gated river basin. In addition observed microbiological data were compared with data from the Danube survey 1988, organised by IAD. Microbial pollution due to anthropogenic im- pacts, especially from large urban settlements, were analysed within defined sections of the River Danube and furthermore compared to biological and chemical data. Indicator bacteria and analysis methods Faecal indicator bacteria like total coliforms, faecal coliforms (thermotolerant coliforms), E. coli and intestinal enterococci (faecal streptococci) are excreted by humans and warm- blooded animals, pass sewage treatment plants to a great amount and survive for a certain time in the aquatic environment (Kavka & Poetsch 2002). E. coli and faecal coliforms are the best indicators for the assessment of recent faecal pollution, mainly caused by raw and treated sewage and diffuse impacts e. g. from farm land and pasture. E. coli and faecal coliforms in- dicate also the potential presence of pathogenic bacteria, viruses and parasites (Kavka & Po- etsch 2002). Detailed knowledge of faecal pollution in aquatic environments is crucial for watershed management activities in order to maintain safe waters for recreational and eco- nomic purposes (Farnleitner et al. 2001). The concentrations of heterotrophic bacteria (hetero- trophic plate count 22°C, colony count 22°C) correspond commonly with contamination by organic matter (Kohl 1975). Analysis of variations of indicator bacteria in the longitudinal stretch of the Danube River and major tributaries were carried out by uniform standard meth- ods in a laboratory on-board to receive comparable results according to ISO 9308-1 1990, EN ISO 7899-2 2000, EN ISO 6222 1999, DEV K5 – 1971, DIN 38411-5 – 1983 (for more de- tails see Kavka & Poetsch 2002). 1 Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management, Federal Agency for Water Management, A-3252 Petzenkirchen, Austria 2 HYDRA-Institute Österreich, Himmelstrasse 42, A-1190 Vienna 3 Institute of Chemical Engineering, Department for Applied Biochemistry and Gene Technology, University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 166-9, A-1060 Vienna 415 Variations of microbiological parameters along the longitudinal course of the Danube River and in major tributaries The Joint Danube Survey (JDS) 2001 included 98 sampling sites from Germany (Neu-Ulm, stream-km 2581) to the Black Sea (Sulina arm, stream-km 15). The variation of the microbi- ological results of all sampling sites along the flow stretch of the River Danube is presented exemplarily by the parameter faecal coliforms (Fig. 1). Tributaries are symbolised as small bars. The target value for the concentrations is marked on the chart. [CFU/ 100ml] Faecal Coliforms 100 000 000 m m r o s L A e - m i g 10 000 000 . r k r S A s a - A - n v e n e a v o 1 000 000 r s e s s o k o u c M M a R 100 000 a t R k t i e l r u i r e S P 10 000 V 1 000 100 10 1 2600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 [Danube km] Fig. 1: Variation of faecal coliforms along the longitudinal course of the Danube River; small bars = tributaries; dotted line = target value; CFU=colony forming units Total coliforms varied from 60 to 75 000, faecal coliforms from 20 to 41 000, intestinal en- terococci from 5 to 2 200 CFU/ 100ml. The target values amount to 10 000/100ml (= imperative value acc. to EU-Bathing water quality directive 76/160 EEC), 1000/100ml and 400/100ml (= target values acc. to the EU-Bathing water quality directive 06/7/EEC) respec- tively (see table 2). In about 42% of all Danube sampling sites including arms and in 53% of the tributaries no compliance with the requirements concerning faecal indicator bacteria were found. In the Danube arms “ Danube arm, Rackeve-Soroksar Danube ar” and the tributaries “Ipoly, Russenski Lom, Arges, Siret and Prut" a great lot of faecal indicator bacte- ria were detected. Heterotrophic plate counts varied from 240 to 54 000 per 1ml in the Danube River. The target value is 10 000 colonies per 1ml water in consideration to Kohl (1975). In about 13% of sam- pling sites of the Danube River more colonies than acceptable were isolated. In the tributaries Drava, Russenski Lom and Arges the highest colony counts (maximum 1 400 000 /ml) occurred. 42% of the tributaries did not comply with the requirements. The concentration ranges of indicator bacteria analysed during JDS 2001 and IAD Survey 1988, arranged by the International Association for Danube Research, are presented in table 1. Both investigations were carried out along the Danube River by uniform methods. JDS took place in August/September 2001, the IAD survey in March 1988. The ranges of results of the two surveys are comparable, although the date sets has been recovered from different seasons. 416 Table 1: JDS 2001 and IAD-Survey 1988; concentration ranges of bacteriological parameters in the longitudinal course of the Danube River; JDS = Joint Danube Survey –ICPDR; IAD-Survey = Danube survey of the International Association for Danube Research Danube Survey JDS 2001 IAD-Survey 1988 No of measured sites 79 25 Concentration ranges 2 4 2 4 Total coliforms 100ml 6.0x10 – 7.5x10 * 4.0x10 – 5.3x10 ** 2 4 1 4 Faecal coliforms 100ml 2.0x10 – 4.1x10 * 3.0x10 – 2.3x10 ** 1 3 Intestinal enterococci 100ml 5.0 - 2.2x103* 1.0x10 - 2.7x10 *** 2 4 3 5 Plate count 22°C 1ml 2.4x10 – 5.4x10 * 1.1x10 – 1.2x10 ** *Kavka & Poetsch (2002); **Albinger (1988); ***Trzilova & Miklosovicova (1988) Microbiological Water Quality Map Microbiological water quality of River Danube and its tributaries has been assessed by the concentrations of standard microbiological parameters, classified by 5 quality classes (table 2) and represented in a microbiological map (fig. 2). Table 2: Class limit values for microbial pollutions of rivers assessed by bacteriological stan- dard parameters according to Kohl (1975, modified), Kavka & Poetsch (2002, modi- fied) and in consideration of EU-Bathing water quality directive 2006/7/EEC (target values for E. coli and enterococci concerning a good microbiological bathing water quality = target values in this table) and directive 76/160 EEC (imperative value for total coliforms concerning bathing water quality = target value in this table); TV=Target Value; FS= faecal streptococci a) faecal pollution, b) pollution by easily degradable organic matter a) Classification Class of faecal pollution I II (TV) III IV V Parameter Faecal little moderately critical strongly excessively pollution Escherichia coli in 100ml > 100 > 1 000 > 10 000 (Faecal Coli- < 100 > 100 000 water - 1 000 - 10 000 - 100 000 forms*) Intestinal Ente- in 100ml > 40 > 400 > 4 000 < 40 > 40 000 rococci (FS) water - 400 - 4 000 - 40 000 Total in 100ml > 500 > 10 000 > 100 000 < 500 >1000 000 Coliforms water -10 000 - 100 000 - 1000 000 * Faecal coliforms are mainly represented by Escherichia coli as predominant species 417 b) Classification CLASS of organic pollution I II III IV V Parameter Organic little moderately critical strongly excessively pollution Heterotrophic in 1 ml > 500 > 10 000 > 100 000 Plate Count < 500 > 750 000 water - 10 000 - 100 000 -750 000 22°C Figure 2 presents a map of faecal pollution of the Danube River at 98 measured sites during JDS 2001. 5 Classes of faecal pollution were assessed by the concentrations of faecal coli- forms and additionally by the concentrations of intestinal enterococci (faecal streptococci) (acc. to table 2). Because one sample per site was taken, direct assessment of the bathing wa- ter quality at the sampling locations cannot be given. The EU- bathing water quality directive requires replications and their respective percentiles. The microbiological samples were taken from the middle of the River Danube. Additional investigations from both river banks would allow a better detecting of the impact of tributaries, raw sewage or waste water treatment plants. In the German and Austrian section of the Danube River (km 2581 – 1880) faecal indicator bacteria indicated a little to moderate faecal contamination and organic pollution in the Da- nube and the tributary Inn (classes I and II) (figure 2). Only at one station in Hainburg, Da- nube km 1881, concentrations of faecal indicator bacteria were relative high (critical faecal pollution, class III). Influences from local contamination by the settlement Hainburg, from the tributary Schwechat River, receiving treated waste water, and probably from the sewage treatment plant of Vienna, are supposed to be responsible. The tributaries Schwechat and Mo- rava River were critical polluted by indicator bacteria. Results were corresponding with data received during the Danube survey “River Rhine to the Hungarian stretch of River Da- nube ” Sampling sites along the Danube course and in side-arms in Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Ser- bia, and Romania upstream Iron Gate I (stream km 1880 – 956) were moderately to strongly faecal polluted (classes II, III, IV) (figure 2).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Treating Two 18Th Century Maps of the Danube in Association with Google-Provided Imagery
    ON THE DIGITAL REVIVAL OF HISTORIC CARTOGRAPHY: TREATING TWO 18TH CENTURY MAPS OF THE DANUBE IN ASSOCIATION WITH GOOGLE-PROVIDED IMAGERY Evangelos Livieratos Angeliki Tsorlini Maria Pazarli [email protected] Chrysoula Boutoura Myron Myridis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Faculty of Surveying Engineering University Campus, Box 497 GRE - 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece Abstract The great navigable Danube River (known as the Istros River to the Ancient Greeks and as one of the crucial ends of the Roman Empire northern territories) is an emblematic fluvial feature of the overall European historic and cultural heritage in the large. Originating in the German Black Forest as two small rivers (Brigach and Breg) converging at the town of Donaueschingen, Danube is flowing for almost 2850 km mainly eastwards, passing through ten states (Germany, Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova and Ukraine) and four European capitals (Vienna, Bratislava, Budapest and Belgrade) with embouchure in the west coasts of the Black Sea via the Danube Delta, mainly in Romania. Danube played a profound role in the European political, social, economic and cultural history influencing in a multifold manner the heritage of many European nations, some of those without even a physical connection with the River, as it is the case of the Greeks, to whom the Danube is a reference to their own 18th century Enlightenment movement. Due to Danube’s important role in History, the extensive emphasis to its cartographic depiction was obviously a conditio sine qua non especially in the 17th and 18th century European cartography. In this paper, taking advantage of the modern digital technologies as applied in the recently established domain of cartographic heritage, two important and historically significant 18th century maps of the Danube are comparatively discussed in view also to the reference possibilities available today in relevant studies by the digital maps offered by powerful providers as e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Preface The "Evaluation of Wetlands and Flkoodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin" study was prepared in the frame of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP). The Study has been undertaken to define priority wetland and floodplain rehabilitation sites as a component of the Pollution reduction Programme. The present report addresses the identification of former floodplains and wetlands in the Danube River Basin, as well as the description of the current status and evaluation of the ecological importance of the potential for rehabilitation. Based on this evaluation, 17 wetland/floodplain sites have been identified for rehabilitation considering their ecological importance, their nutrient removal capacity and their role in flood protection. Most of the identified wetlands will require transboundary cooperation and represent an important first step in retoring the ecological balance in the Danube River Basin. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps that can be found in Annex I of the study. The study was prepared by the WWF-Danube-Carpathian-Programme and the WWF-Auen-Institut (Institute for Floodplains Ecology, WWF-Germany), under the guidance of the UNDP/GEF team of experts of the Danube Programme Coordination Unit (DPCU) in Vienna, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of European Neogene Freshwater Gastropod Localities: Updated Stratigraphy and Geography
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Synopsis of European Neogene freshwater gastropod localities: updated stratigraphy and geography Thomas A. Neubauer, Elisavet Georgopoulou, Andreas Kroh, Mathias Harzhauser, Oleg Mandic, and Daniela Esu ABSTRACT The last overview of Cenozoic localities with records of freshwater gastropods was provided more than 80 years ago. Since then, a wealth of new information has been published: new localities have been discovered and fundamental changes occurred in regional stratigraphy. In addition, many localities are still attributed to erro- neous or outdated stratigraphical concepts even in recent papers. Geopolitical evolu- tion of Europe has, furthermore, led to name changes and confusion regarding the exact origin of samples in collections. Here we provide a fully georeferenced dataset for almost all published Miocene and Pliocene freshwater gastropod localities (2,930), including updated stratigraphic data where possible. This basic update will serve as an essential fundament for any future work related to the freshwater deposits and respec- tive faunas in general. Thomas A. Neubauer. Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] Elisavet Georgopoulou. Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] Andreas Kroh. Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] Mathias Harzhauser. Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] Oleg Mandic. Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] Daniela Esu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Danube River Basin District
    / / / / a n ï a r k U / /// ija ven Slo /// o / sk n e v o l S / / / / a r o G a n r C i a j i b r S / / / / a i n â m o R / / / / a v o d l o M / / / / g á z s r ro ya ag M The /// a / blik repu Danube River Ceská / Hrvatska //// osna i Hercegovina //// Ba˘lgarija /// / B /// Basin District h ic e River basin characteristics, impact of human activities and economic analysis required under Article 5, Annex II randr Annex III, and inventory of protected areas required under Article 6, Annex IV of the EU Water Framework Directivee (2000/60/EC) t s Part A – Basin-wide overviewÖ / / Short: “Danube Basin Analysis (WFD Roof Report 2004)” / / d n a l h c s t u e D / / / / The complete report consists of Part A: Basin-wide overview, and Part B: Detailed analysis of the Danube river basin countries 18 March 2005, Reporting deadline: 22 March 2005 Prepared by International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) in cooperation with the countries of the Danube River Basin District. The Contracting Parties to the Danube River Protection Convention endorsed this report at the 7th Ordinary Meeting of the ICPDR on December 13-14, 2004. The final version of the report was approved 18 March 2005. Overall coordination and editing by Dr. Ursula Schmedtje, Technical Expert for River Basin Management at the ICPDR Secretariat, under the guidance of the River Basin Management Expert Group. ICPDR Document IC/084, 18 March 2005 International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River Vienna International Centre D0412 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Water Resources in Rivers in the Bulgarian Basins of the Lower Danube
    www.ebscohost.com www.gi.sanu.ac.rs, www.doiserbia.nb.rs, J. Geogr. Inst. Cvijic. 67(1) (11–25) Original scientific paper UDC: 911.2:556.53 (497.2) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1701011I DETERMINATION OF WATER RESOURCES IN RIVERS IN THE BULGARIAN BASINS OF THE LOWER DANUBE Plamen Iliev Ninov*, Tzviatka Ivanova Karagiozova*, Maya Yordanova 1 Rankova* * National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology — BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria Received: December 29, 2016; Reviewed: March 10, 2017; Accepted: March 31, 2017 Abstract: Object of the study is surface water bodies from category “rivers” according to Water Framework Directive 2000/60/ЕС. Surface water assessment is important for number of activities such as: water management in the country, making reports to international agencies, determining the change of the resources in the light of upcoming climate changes. The determination of water resources is based on information of hydrometric stations from the monitoring network system in the National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology — Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (NIMH- BAS) in which real ongoing and available water flows that are subject of management are registered. In the study a technology for surface water bodies in the Bulgarian basins of the lower Danube is applied which has been developed in the frame of cooperative project together with the Ministry of Environment and Water. This is absolutely true for the Bulgarian section of the Danube River basin which is expressed in big number and variety of hydrological homogeneous sections. The river flow is characterized with annual and inter-annual variability determined by climatic factors and anthropogenic influences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Flood Wave Superposition for the Severity of Large Floods
    https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-312 Preprint. Discussion started: 9 July 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. The role of flood wave superposition for the severity of large floods Björn Guse1, Bruno Merz1,2, Luzie Wietzke1, Sophie Ullrich1, Alberto Viglione3,4, and Sergiy Vorogushyn1 1GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Hydrology Section, Potsdam, Germany 2University of Potsdam, Institute for Environmental Sciences and Geography, Potsdam, Germany 3Vienna University of Technology, Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management, Vienna, Austria 4Politecnico di Torino, Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering (DIATI), Torino, Italy Correspondence: Björn Guse ([email protected]) Abstract. The severity of floods is shaped not only by event and catchment specific characteristics but also depends on river network configuration. At the confluence of relevant tributaries to the main river, flood event characteristics may change de- pending on magnitude and temporal matching of flood waves. This superposition of flood waves may potentially increase flood severity. However, this aspect is up to now not analysed for a large data set. 5 To fill this gap, the role of flood wave superposition in determining flood severity is investigated. A novel methodological approach to analyse flood wave superposition is presented and applied to mean daily discharge data of 37 triple points from the four large river basins in Germany and Austria (Elbe, Danube, Rhine and Weser). A triple point consists of the three gauges at the tributary as well as upstream and downstream of the confluence to the main river. At the triple points, differences and similarities in flood characteristics are jointly analysed in terms of temporal matching and magnitudes of flood peaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Campaigns of the Thirty Years War Won by the Sword
    Rhine River Babenhausen Aschaffenburg HESSE-CASSEL Winter Spring Summer Fall Culmbach Main River Main River Lohr Hassfurt Darmstadt January February March April May June July August September October November December Siege / VP Worms Schweifurt HESSE-DARMSTADT Track Bayreuth 1 Bamberg PALATINATE Würzburg SAXONY Erbach Miltenberg 2 Neustadt Mannheim Mergentheim Windsheim Forchheim Key Strong Connector Fortress Heidelberg Fortress Nec Off Map 3 kar River Strong Nürnberg Village Connector Speyer Rothenburg on Town Adelsheim Tauber Wimpfen Hensbruck Town Difficult Terrain / 4 Amberg River Crossing Philipsburg Bishopric Connector Landau Bretten Ansbach Schwarzenfeld Permanently 5 Heilbronn Crailsheim Regional Feucht Major Neutral Eppingen River Border Durlach Neumarkt 6 Schwäbisch Hall Dinkelsbühl Gunzenhausen Pforzheim WÜRTTEMBERG FRANCONIA Regensburg 7 Hagenau Daßwang Ratisbon BOHEMIA Stuttgart Donau / Dan Gmünd Pappenheim 8 Nördlingen ube River Baden Aalen Eichstadt Straubing BOHEMIAN FOREST 9 CE Neustadt Calw kar River 10 ALSA Nec Göppingen Strasburg ADEN Winklsaß B Nürtingen Heidenheim Donauwörth Ingolstadt Kehl 11 Wildberg Neuburg ube River Vilshofen Tübingen Geislingen Donau / Dan Lec LOWER BAVARIA Iser River 12 Sontheim h River Landau Schlettstadt Günzburg Triberg 13 Horb WÜRTTEMBERG Schwabmünchen Rhine River Passau Lahr Landshut 14 Schrobenhausen Pfaffenhofen Colmar Ehingen Ulm Freising Zusmarshausen Balingen BAYERN Erharting 15 Iller River BAVARIA CK FOREST Rottweil Augsburg Breisach BLA 16 Hattenhofen Riedlingen UPPER AUSTRIA Freiburg
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Drainage Basin of the Black Sea
    165 CHAPTER 5 DRAINAGE BASIN OF THE BLACK SEA This chapter deals with the assessment of transboundary rivers, lakes and groundwa- ters, as well as selected Ramsar Sites and other wetlands of transboundary importance, which are located in the basin of the Black Sea. Assessed transboundary waters in the drainage basin of the Black Sea Transboundary groundwaters Ramsar Sites/wetlands of Basin/sub-basin(s) Recipient Riparian countries Lakes in the basin within the basin transboundary importance Rezovska/Multudere Black Sea BG, TR Danube Black Sea AT, BA, BG, Reservoirs Silurian-Cretaceous (MD, RO, Lower Danube Green Corridor and HR, CZ, DE, Iron Gate I and UA), Q,N1-2,Pg2-3,Cr2 (RO, UA), Delta Wetlands (BG, MD, RO, UA) HU, MD, ME, Iron Gate II, Dobrudja/Dobrogea Neogene- RO, RS, SI, Lake Neusiedl Sarmatian (BG-RO), Dobrudja/ CH, UA Dobrogea Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous (BG-RO), South Western Backa/Dunav aquifer (RS, HR), Northeast Backa/ Danube -Tisza Interfluve or Backa/Danube-Tisza Interfluve aquifer (RS, HU), Podunajska Basin, Zitny Ostrov/Szigetköz, Hanság-Rábca (HU), Komarnanska Vysoka Kryha/Dunántúli – középhegység északi rész (HU) - Lech Danube AT, DE - Inn Danube AT, DE, IT, CH - Morava Danube AT, CZ, SK Floodplains of the Morava- Dyje-Danube Confluence --Dyje Morava AT, CZ - Raab/Rába Danube AT, HU Rába shallow aquifer, Rába porous cold and thermal aquifer, Rába Kőszeg mountain fractured aquifer, Günser Gebirge Umland, Günstal, Hügelland Raab Ost, Hügelland Raab West, Hügelland Rabnitz, Lafnitztal, Pinkatal 1, Pinkatal 2, Raabtal,
    [Show full text]
  • SOLT I German Module 4 Lesson 2 Student Manual
    SOLT I German Module 4 Lesson 2 Student Manual Geography Geography German SOLT I Objectives Module 4 Lesson 2 At the end of this lesson you will be able identify the different German states and the countries surrounding Germany. In order to achieve this objective you will: Recognize the German States and Their Locations • Recognize the states’ locations, their capitals, major cities, and regions within the states • Describe their areas and borders • Brief about Germany • Describe the geography of Germany • Talk about the location of military installations in Germany • Identify the national flag of the country Identify Nationalities • Identify languages in the world countries • Identify different ethnic groups • Describe demographic composition 47 Geography German SOLT I Introduction Module 4 Lesson 2 Features of Germany You are planning a short vacation somewhere in Germany and have asked one of your German counterparts to describe some of the various landscapes, since you can’t decide. He gives you a quick description of Germany’s geography. Where will you decide to go? Deutschland hat sechzehn Bundesländer. Die Hauptstadt von Deutschland ist Berlin. In jedem Bundesland gibt es sehr schöne Landschaften. Im Norden ist die Nordsee mit der schönen Insel Sylt. Das Land ist flach. Die Bundesländer dort sind Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg und Bremen. In der Mitte von Deutschland gibt es viele Berge. Besonders schön ist der Teutoburger Wald und der Hunsrück. Weiter südlich gibt es natürlich den berühmten Schwarzwald im Westen und den Bayrischen Wald. Einige Bundesländer dort sind Sachsen-Anhalt, Thüringen, Hessen und Nordrhein-Westfalen. Im südlichen Teil von Deutschland liegt Bayern.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of Late Quaternary Fluvial Terraces at the Confluence of the Lech and Danube Valleys
    Quaternary Science Journal GEOZON SCIENCE MEDIA Volume 60 / Number 4 / 2011 / 414–424 / DOI 10.3285/eg.60.4.02 ISSN 0424-7116 E&G www.quaternary-science.net Stratigraphy of Late Quaternary fluvial terraces at the confluence of the Lech and Danube valleys Patrick Schielein, Gerhard Schellmann, Johanna Lomax Abstract: The main purpose oft the study is the Würmian Lateglacial and Holocene valley development at the confluence of the Lech and Danube valleys, located in the Northern Alpine Foreland. The morphological features in the study area were surveyed by field mapping and high resolution Digital Elevation Models. The deposits of both rivers were examined in numerous outcrops and dated using radiocarbon and luminescence measurements. Also archaeological data and historical maps were taken into account. The oldest terrace of the valley floor is a Würmian Lateglacial Niederterrasse, which is only prevalent in the Danube valley slightly downstream of the confluence. Fragmentary terraces of Preboreal/Boreal age have been preserved in both valleys and gravel deposits of this age extensively underlie younger terraces. The Atlantic period is not represented by river channel deposits in the study area. In contrast, Subboreal and Subalantic gravel deposits morphologically dominate the lower Lech valley and the Danube valley downstream of the confluence. Up to six Subatlantic terraces accompany the recent courses of Lech and Danube. The distribution and morphological appearance of the Late Subatlantic terraces at the Danube upstream of the confluence refer to a meandering river, whereas the morphology of the youngest Lech terraces predominantly relates to an anabranching river. Downstream of the Lech – Danube confluence the Subatlantic terrace morphology is a transitional one between a meandering and an anabranching depositional setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Danube Navigation Imprint
    Manual on Danube Navigation Imprint Published by: via donau – Österreichische Wasserstraßen-Gesellschaft mbH Donau-City-Straße 1, 1220 Vienna [email protected] www.via-donau.org Responsibility for content: Hans-Peter Hasenbichler Project management: Martin Paschinger Editing: Thomas Hartl, Vera Hofbauer Technical contributions: Maja Dolinsek, Simon Hartl, Thomas Hartl, Brigitte Hintergräber, Vera Hofbauer, Martin Hrusovsky, Gudrun Maierbrugger, Bettina Matzner, Lisa-Maria Putz, Mario Sattler, Juha Schweighofer, Lukas Seemann, Markus Simoner, Dagmar Slavicek Sponsoring: Hedwig Döllinger, Hélène Gilkarov Layout: Bernd Weißmann Print: Grasl Druck & Neue Medien GmbH Vienna, January 2013 ISBN 3-00-009626-4 © via donau 2013 Klimaneutrale Produktion Erneuerbare Energie Nachhaltiges Papier Pflanzenölfarben The Manual on Danube Navigation is a project of the National Action Plan Danube Navigation. Preface Providing knowledge for better utilising the Danube’s potential In connection with the Rhine, the Danube is more and more developing into a main European traffic axis which ranges from the North Sea to the Black Sea at a distance of 3,500 kilometres, thereby directly connecting 15 countries via waterway. Some of the Danube riparian states show the highest economic growth rates amongst the states of Europe. Such an increase in trade entails an enormous growth of traffic in the Danube corridor and requires reliable and efficient transport routes. The European Commission has recognised that the Danube waterway may serve as the backbone of this dynamically growing region and it has included the Danube as a Priority Project in the Trans-European Transport Network Siim Kallas (TEN-T) to ensure better transport connections and economic growth. Vice-President of the European Prerequisite for the utilisation of the undisputed potentials of inland naviga- Commission, Commissioner for tion is the removal of existing infrastructure bottlenecks and weak spots in the Transport European waterway network.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Management in Bulgaria
    Water Resources Management in Bulgaria Dr. Atanas Paskalev * Bulgarian National Association on Water Quality ABSTRACT Located on the Balkan Peninsula, Bulgaria has an area of 110 911 km2 and population of 8 000 000 residents. Bulgarian has common boundaries with Romania, Yugoslavia, Greece, Former Yogosl.Rep.,Macedonia, and Turkey as it shown on Fig. 1. The Bulgarian territory is about three-fourth mountainous and one-fourth plains. Slovakia Ukraine Austria Hungary Switzerland Slovenia Romania Croatia Bosnia and Herzegovina Yugoslavia Sofia Italy Bulgaria Albania Fmr Yug Rep Macedonia Greece Turkey Fig. 1 Average population density is 81 persons per km2. About 65 percent of the population live in towns1). Urban population expanded rapidly through the 1970s. Sofia, the capital city, had a population of 1 250 000 in 1992. |Other large cities are Plovdiv 350,000, Varna 250 000, Ruse 193 000, Pleven 138 000, Dobrich 114 000, Vratsa 84 000,Gabrovo 80 000, Vidin 67 000, Razgrad 58 000, Silistra 57 000, Montana 566 000, Lovech 51 000. Average annual precipitation fluctuates within the range of 2000 mm in high mountains (Central Rila Mountains) to 500 mm in the North-East Bulgaria (Silistra region). In the plains of the Danubian plain the precipitation is only 500 - 600 mm. In some years there is no precipitation over the summer period (from June to the end of August). 1 In humid years the long-term average values are exceeded by 120 - 150%. In dry years the precipitation total decreases down the minimum of 300 mm in North-East. The annual distribution of precipitation shows the maximum in spring (April - May), when convective precipitation constitutes a considerable contribution to the total precipitation.
    [Show full text]