2014 Legislative Digest
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Puerto Rico Chamber of Commerce, Birling Capital Advisors, LLC, and El Nuevo Día Invite You to The
The Puerto Rico Chamber of Commerce, Birling Capital Advisors, LLC, and El Nuevo Día invite you to the... Friday, February 22, 2019 | Sheraton Puerto Rico Hotel & Casino – San Juan Ballroom Registration: 7:30 a.m. - 8:30 a.m. | Conference: 8:30 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. |Networking Cocktail: 6:00pm-8:00pm Preliminary Schedule of Events (2-14-19) 7:30-8:30am Registration 8:30-8:45am Welcome Remarks Mr. Francisco J. Rodríguez-Castro, President & CEO of Birling Capitol Advisors, LLC and Chairman of the 3rd PROMESA Conference Mr. Kenneth Rivera Robles, CPA & Esq., President & Chairman of the Board, PRCC 8:45-9:00am Special Video Message from The United States Congress Invited Keynote Speaker: • Hon. Sean Duffy, U.S. House Representative for Wisconsin’s 7th Congressional District 9:00-9:15am Special Keynote: We are going to need a bigger Boat: The Ugly Truth of HealthCare Invited Keynote Speaker: • Mr. James P. O’Drobinak, Chief Executive Officer of Medical Card System, Inc. (MCS) 9:15-10:15am Special Plenary Session: How is PROMESA Impacting Democracy in Puerto Rico Moderator: Mr. Luis Dávila Colón, Esq. Discussion Panel and Invited Panelists: • Hon. Antonio L. Soto Torres, President Commission of Treasury & Budget, House of Representatives of Puerto Rico • Hon. Carmelo J. Ríos-Santiago, Majority Leader, Senate of Puerto Rico • Hon. Eduardo Bhatia Gautier, Puerto Rico Senate Minority Leader and Former President of the Senate of Puerto Rico • Hon. Rafael “Tatito” Hernández, Minority Leader, Puerto Rico House of Representatives 10:15-11:15am Panel I: Dispelling the Puerto Rico Fiscal Plan and Law 20/22 Social and Economic Impact to Puerto Rico Moderator: Mr. -
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 2 ARGUMENT .............................................................................................................................. 5 I. Legislative Defendants Must Provide the Information Requested in the Second Set of Interrogatories ............................................................................................................. 5 II. In the Alternative, or if Legislative Defendants Do Not Provide The Home Addresses By March 1, the Court Should Bar Legislative Defendants From Defending the 2017 Plans on the Basis of Any Incumbency Theory................................. 7 III. The Court Should Award Fees and Expenses and Other Appropriate Relief ..................... 8 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................... 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .................................................................................................. 11 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Cloer v. Smith , 132 N.C. App. 569, 512 S.E.2d 779 (1999)............................................................................ 7 F. E. Davis -
February 14, 2018 the Honorable Ricardo Rosselló Governor La
February 14, 2018 The Honorable Ricardo Rosselló Governor La Fortaleza P.O. Box 9020082 San Juan, PR 00902-0082 Dear Governor Rosselló, I write as president of the American Statistical Association to respectfully urge you to keep Puerto Rico’s statistical agency, El Instituto de Estadísticas de Puerto Rico (Puerto Rico Institute of Statistics, PRIS), and its board of directors fully independent. I also draw your attention to the 2,800 individuals—and still growing—who have signed a petition with this same request.1 At this critical historical juncture, Puerto Rico needs accurate, objective, and timely statistics. Government statistics empower the economy, serve the health and welfare of citizens, improve governance, and inform decisions and policies in the public and private sectors, among many other vital functions. Government statistics are also fundamental to evidence-based policymaking, the engagement of which is on a rapid rise in local, state, and federal governments. To address the challenges posed by its decade-long economic recession and the devastation of back-to-back hurricanes, Puerto Rico must chart its path toward sustainable recovery using reputable and reliable data and statistical methods. Because of their broad and profound importance, it is imperative that government statistics be produced through rigorous scientific processes and analyses performed by experts that can function without improper outside influence. Government statistics must be independent, objective, accurate, and timely and be perceived as such. It is just as important to have adequate statistics on a variety of topics. PRIS has demonstrated repeatedly it has the expertise to function independently to produce rigorous, objective, and accurate statistics for the benefit of Puerto Rico and its people. -
Jamie Raskin Ben Cardin
HHH Official Democratic Sample Ballot HHH General Election • November 6, 2018 • 7 am - 8 pm IT IS LEGAL TO TAKE THIS SAMPLE BALLOT INTO THE VOTING BOOTH Need A Ride to the Polls or more information Call 301-946-1000 BEN CARDIN United States Senator • Third-generation Marylander who has dedicated his life to public service. • Strident defender of the Chesapeake Bay. • Has fought to strengthen the middle class and improve our economy. • Held the line against Republican attempts to repeal Obamacare and deny coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions. • Voted against the Trump tax cuts that gave permanent breaks to big corporations. • Taking on the NRA to pass a national ban on assault weapons, bump stocks and require universal background checks for all gun purchases. • Lead Democrat on the Senate Small Business Committee, where he works to empower minority-, women- and veteran-owned small businesses. • Fighting to safeguard civil rights and banish discrimination. • Leader in protecting Planned Parenthood, and defending women’s rights and human rights at home and globally. • Vocal defender of federal workers. • Working to ensure quality higher education is within reach. JAMIE RASKIN U.S. House of Representatives, District 8 • Currently represents Maryland’s 8th District in the U.S. House of Representatives. • Vice-Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee. • Senior Whip for the Democratic Caucus. • Vice-Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. • Was a constitutional law professor for a quarter-century at American University prior to being elected to Congress in 2016. • Served for a decade in the Maryland Senate where he was Majority Whip. -
Annual Report, 2017, & Regional Directory, 2018
THE FUTURE OF THE REGION IS OUR BUSINESS 2017 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 REGIONAL DIRECTORY COVER (COG LEADERSHIP, BOARD) ROW 1 Matthew Letourneau, COG Board Chairman, Loudoun County Robert White, Jr., COG Board Vice Chairman, District of Columbia Derrick L. Davis, COG Board Vice Chairman, Prince George’s County Phil Mendelson, COG President, District of Columbia Karen Toles, COG Vice President, Prince George’s County Phyllis Randall, COG Vice President, Loudoun County Kate Stewart, COG Secretary-Treasurer, City of Takoma Park ROW 2 ABOUT COG Charles Allen, Transportation Planning The Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) is Board Chair, District of Columbia an independent, nonprofit association that brings area leaders Katie Cristol, Human Services Policy Committee Chair, Arlington County together to address major regional issues in the District of Libby Garvey, Chesapeake Bay and Water Columbia, suburban Maryland, and Northern Virginia. COG’s Resources Policy Committee Chair, membership is comprised of 300 elected officials from 24 local Arlington County governments, the Maryland and Virginia state legislatures, and Danielle Glaros, Region Forward Coalition Chair, Prince George’s County U.S. Congress. Mary Lehman, Climate, Energy, and Environment Policy Committee Chair, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Prince George’s County Directory entries are updated by each local government and include Hans Riemer, Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee Chair, city and county departments and offices in areas related to Montgomery County committees -
2021 Maryland Legislative Guide
MarylandLeg Guide 2021.qxp_001_legisguide_CL 11/20/20 1:14 PM Page 1 2021 MARYLAND LEGISLATIVE GUIDE PROVIDED COURTESY OF CHOPTANK ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE H MarylandLeg Guide 2021.qxp_001_legisguide_CL 11/20/20 1:14 PM Page 2 H MARYLAND HOUSE OF DELEGATES SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE SPEAKER PRO TEM Adrienne Jones (D) Sheee Sample-Hughes (D) BALTIMORE COUNTY DORCHESTER AND WICOMICO COUNTIES HOUSE DISTRICT 39 HOUSE DISTRICT 37A Gabriel Acevero (D) Christopher Adams (R) Curt Anderson (D) Carl Anderton (R) Steven Arentz (R) HOUSE DISTRICT 39 HOUSE DISTRICT 37B HOUSE DISTRICT 43 HOUSE DISTRICT 38B HOUSE DISTRICT 36 Lauren Arikan (R) Dalya Attar (D) Vanessa Atterbeary (D) Heather Bagnall (D) Ben Barnes (D) HOUSE DISTRICT 7 HOUSE DISTRICT 41 HOUSE DISTRICT 13 HOUSE DISTRICT 33 HOUSE DISTRICT 21 Darryl Barnes (D) Erek Barron (D) Sandy Bartlett (D) Kumar Barve (D) Wendell Beitzel (R) HOUSE DISTRICT 25 HOUSE DISTRICT 24 HOUSE DISTRICT 32 HOUSE DISTRICT 17 HOUSE DISTRICT 1A Lisa Belcastro (D) Harry Bhandari (D) Joseph Boteler (R) Regina Boyce (D) Chanel Branch (D) HOUSE DISTRICT 11 HOUSE DISTRICT 8 HOUSE DISTRICT 8 HOUSE DISTRICT 43 HOUSE DISTRICT 45 2 2021 Maryland Legislative Guide MarylandLeg Guide 2021.qxp_001_legisguide_CL 11/20/20 1:14 PM Page 3 H MARYLAND HOUSE OF DELEGATES continued on next page Talmadge Branch (D) Tony Bridges (D) Benjamin Brooks (D) Jason Buckel (R) Jon Cardin (D) HOUSE DISTRICT 45 HOUSE DISTRICT 41 HOUSE DISTRICT 10 HOUSE DISTRICT 1B HOUSE DISTRICT 11 Ned Carey (D) Alfred Carr (D) Mark Chang (D) Lorig Charkoudian (D) Nick Charles -
Information Packet
80th West Virginia Legislature - 2011 Information Packet Information Packet 80th West Virginia Legislature 2011 West Virginia Legislature’s Office of Reference & Information | http://www.legis.state.wv.us | telephone: 1-304-347-4836 | fax: 1-304-347-4901 2011 Information Packet p. 1 Contents Revised: February 1, 2011 11:00 AM State Organizational Chart p. 3 Senate Membership Photos p. 4 House Membership Photos p. 5-7 Senate Membership Phone & Office Numbers p. 8 House Membership Phone & Office Numbers p. 9 Senate Leadership & Standing Committees p. 10-11 House Leadership & Standing Committees p. 12-15 Senate Chamber Seating Chart p. 16 House Chamber Seating Chart p. 17 Delegates by District & District Map p. 18-19 Senators by District & District Map p. 20 State Capitol Maps p. 21-26 State Agencies - Toll-Free Numbers p. 27-28 State Colleges & Universities - Toll-Free Numbers p. 28 State Capitol Phone Numbers p. 28 State Agencies - Web site Addresses p. 29-30 State & National Political Org’s - Web site Addresses p. 30 State Colleges & Universities - Web site Addresses p. 30 West Virginia Congressional Map & Contact Information p. 31 Congressional District Map & Contact Information p. 32-33 Legislative Calender p. 34 STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA ORGANIZATIONAL CHART CITIZENS LEGISLATIVE EXECUTIVE JUDICIAL BRANCH BRANCH BRANCH HOUSE OF SUPREME SENATE GOVERNOR DELEGATES COURT JOINT ATTORNEY SECRETARY CIRCUIT AGRICULTURE AUDITOR TREASURER COMMITTEE GENERAL OF STATE COURTS FAMILY COURTS DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & HUMAN MILITARY AFFAIRS ADMINISTRATION EDUCATION REVENUE TRANSPORTATION COMMERCE THE ARTS PROTECTION RESOURCES & PUBLIC SAFETY MAGISTRATE COURTS BUREAU OF WV COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION SENIOR COMMUNITY & TECH. -
State Reforms Reducing Collateral Consequences for People with Criminal Records: 2011-2012 Legislative Round-Up1
A project of LEGISLATIVE UPDATE September 2012 State Reforms Reducing Collateral Consequences for People with Criminal Records: 2011-2012 Legislative Round-Up1 Over the past forty years the prison population in the United States has skyrocketed 600% and the number of Americans with felony convictions has grown to 19.8 million adults or 8.6% of the adult population.2 According to the National Employment Law Project (NELP), an estimated 65 million Americans have a criminal record.3 Although it might be reasonable to assume that individuals who have completed their sentences are free from conviction-related constraints,4 according to Attorney General Eric Holder, the American Bar Association (ABA) has identified over 38,000 penalties, called collateral consequences that can impact people long after they complete their criminal sentence.5 Collateral consequences are the additional penalties tied to a conviction that greatly impact an individual’s capacity to engage politically, economically and socially upon their reentry to society. These consequences include barriers to housing, education, and employment, felony disenfranchisement, and ineligibility for public benefits. Collateral consequences are distinct from direct consequences of convictions in that they are not factored into the calculation of punishment or sentencing, and are triggered outside the jurisdiction of the courts. Nationwide there is a growing bipartisan awareness of the long-term negative impact of collateral consequences and states are taking steps to combat the ill effects of these sanctions. 1 This paper is a collaboration of the ACLU, Crossroad Bible Institute, The Sentencing Project, the National Employment Law Project (NELP), and the National H.I.R.E. -
Underthedome
UNDER the DOME JANUARY 20, 2015 Welcome Under the Dome is a weekly update on actions and activities of the West Virginia Legislature, provided for West Virginia University faculty and staff by WVU’s Office of State, Corporate and Local Relations. A Historic Legislative Session Begins The 81st Legislature of the State of West Virginia convened on January 14, 2015. For the first time in 80 years, Republicans gained control of both the Senate and the House of Delegates. The Senate elected Bill Cole (R-Mercer) as President, and the House of Delegates elected Tim Armstead (R-Kanawha) as Speaker. Senator Jeff Kessler (D-Marshall) is the Senate Minority Leader, and Delegate Tim Miley (D-Harrison) is the House Minority Leader. State of the State Address West Virginia Governor Earl Ray Tomblin presented his fourth State of the State address on January 14 in the House Chamber at the State Capitol. Highlights from his address include: • The need for cooperation between both parties • The establishment of a STEM network to review education initiatives and refine local programs to improve service to students • The need for additional legal reforms • The need for alternative certification of teachers The Budget The Governor’s budget proposal to the Legislature includes a 1.4 percent reduction in higher education’s base budget allocation for each institution (about $2M for WVU). Additionally, in previous budgets passed by the Legislature, certain programs had dedicated funding within our budget. All told, WVU had approximately $6.7M in programming with dedicated funding within our operating appropriation. The Governor’s budget proposal removes all language that dedicated money for those programs and also removed 80 percent of the funding for those programs. -
The Racial Justice Act and the Long Struggle with Race and the Death Penalty in North Carolina*
MOSTELLER&KOTCH.PTD2 9/18/10 12:07 PM THE RACIAL JUSTICE ACT AND THE LONG STRUGGLE WITH RACE AND THE DEATH PENALTY IN NORTH CAROLINA* SETH KOTCH & ROBERT P. MOSTELLER** In August 2009, the North Carolina General Assembly enacted the Racial Justice Act (“RJA”), which commands that no person shall be executed “pursuant to any judgment that was sought or obtained on the basis of race.” One of the most significant features of the RJA is its use of statistical evidence to determine whether the race of defendants or victims played a significant role in death penalty decisions by prosecutors and jurors and in the prosecutor’s exercise of peremptory challenges. The RJA commits North Carolina courts to ensuring that race does not significantly affect death sentences. This Article examines the RJA and North Carolina’s long struggle with race and the death penalty. The first part traces the history of race and the death penalty in the state, showing that racial prejudice exerted a consistent, strong, and pernicious influence on the imposition and disposition of death sentences. From colonial times into the 1960s, the overwhelming majority of those executed were African American, and although most victims and perpetrators of crime are of the same race, the overwhelming majority of victims in cases where executions took place were white. Hundreds of African Americans have been executed for a variety of crimes against white victims, including scores of African American men executed for rape. However, just four whites have been executed for crimes against African American victims, all murders. * © 2010 Seth Kotch & Robert P. -
Supreme Court of the United States
No. _______ In The Supreme Court of the United States -------------------------- ♦ --------------------------- MARGARET DICKSON, et al., Petitioners, v. ROBERT RUCHO, et al., Respondents. -------------------------- ♦ -------------------------- ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA -------------------------- ♦ -------------------------- PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI -------------------------- ♦ -------------------------- Walter Dellinger Anita S. Earls Danielle Gray Counsel of Record Anton Metlitsky Allison J. Riggs O’MELVENY & MEYERS LLP George Eppsteiner 1625 Eye Street, N.W. SOUTHERN COALITION Washington, D.C. 20005 FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE (202) 383-5300 1415 Highway 54, Suite 101 [email protected] Durham, North Carolina 27707 [email protected] (919) 323-3380 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners Counsel for Petitioners NAACP, et al. Dated: January 16, 2015 (Counsel Continued Inside Cover) THE LEX GROUPDC ♦ 1825 K Street, N.W. ♦ Suite 103 ♦ Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 955-0001 ♦ (800) 856-4419 ♦ Fax: (202) 955-0022 ♦ www.thelexgroup.com No. _______ Edwin M. Speas, Jr. John W. O’Hale Caroline P. Mackie POYNER SPRUILL LLP Post Office Box 1801 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 (919) 783-6400 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners Dickson, et al. Adam Stein TIN FULTON WALKER & OWEN, PLLC 312 West Franklin Street Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516 (919) 240-7089 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners NAACP, et al. THE LEX GROUPDC ♦ 1825 K Street, N.W. ♦ Suite 103 ♦ Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 955-0001 ♦ (800) 856-4419 ♦ Fax: (202) 955-0022 ♦ www.thelexgroup.com i QUESTIONS PRESENTED It is undisputed that in drawing legislative and congressional redistricting plans in 2011, the North Carolina General Assembly employed two race-based criteria as “safe harbors” and explicitly refused to consider any alternative plan that did not meet those criteria. -
2011 Political Contributions
2011 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2011 Lilly Political Contributions 2 Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at both the state and federal levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S. debate over health care and pharmaceutical innovation. As a company that operates in a highly competitive and regulated industry, Lilly must participate in the political process to fulfill its fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders, and its overall responsibilities to its customers and its employees. Corporate Political Contribution Elected officials, no matter what level, have an impact on public policy issues affecting Lilly. We are committed to backing candidates who support public policies that contribute to pharmaceutical innovation and healthy patients. A number of factors are considered when reviewing candidates for support. The following evaluation criteria are used to allocate political contributions: • Has the candidate historically voted or announced positions on issues of importance to Lilly, such as pharmaceutical innovation and health care? • Has the candidate demonstrated leadership on key committees of importance to our business? • Does the candidate demonstrate potential for legislative leadership?