DOCSLIB.ORG

2011 Political Contributions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2011 Political Contributions 2011 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2011 Lilly Political Contributions 2 Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at both the state and federal levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S. debate over health care and pharmaceutical innovation. As a company that operates in a highly competitive and regulated industry, Lilly must participate in the political process to fulfill its fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders, and its overall responsibilities to its customers and its employees. Corporate Political Contribution Elected officials, no matter what level, have an impact on public policy issues affecting Lilly. We are committed to backing candidates who support public policies that contribute to pharmaceutical innovation and healthy patients. A number of factors are considered when reviewing candidates for support. The following evaluation criteria are used to allocate political contributions: • Has the candidate historically voted or announced positions on issues of importance to Lilly, such as pharmaceutical innovation and health care? • Has the candidate demonstrated leadership on key committees of importance to our business? • Does the candidate demonstrate potential for legislative leadership? • Is the candidate dedicated to improving the relationship between business and government? • Does the candidate represent a state or district where Lilly operates a facility or has a large concentration of employees or retirees? • Would Lilly support have an impact on his or her campaign? It is against company policy for any company funds, property, or employee services to be used or authorized to support any candidate for political office, political party, official, or committee unless the support is permitted by law and approved by the appropriate company representatives. Lilly corporate political contributions are made in accordance with a budget for company political contributions. This budget is determined annually and allocated by state. Throughout the year, members of the company’s government affairs organization bring forward specific recommendations for company political contributions. The Chief Financial Officer or his designee and General Counsel of the company or his designee must approve U.S. corporate political contributions before they are made. The government affairs group manages the process for delivery of contributions so approved. 2011 Lilly Political Contributions 3 LillyPAC Contributions initiatives, advocacy efforts, and the important work In addition to corporate political contributions, conducted by Lilly employees every day to make the Lilly also enables voluntary eligible employee world a healthier place to live. LillyPAD creates the participation by sponsoring a Political Action opportunity for two-way conversations. Committee -- LillyPAC. The LillyPAC Governing Board (the Board) oversees all contributions made Lilly also founded The Campaign for Modern by LillyPAC. The Board is comprised of 13 U.S.- Medicines (www.modernmedicines.com). The based employees who represent components Campaign for Modern Medicines believes that throughout the company. patients deserve timely access to breakthrough medicines and that the U.S. should be the global LillyPAC contributions are made in accordance leader in discovering and delivering these new with a budget, which is determined annually by lifesaving cures and treatments. The Campaign for the Board. The Board utilizes the same corporate Modern Medicines is an organization of like-minded contribution criteria outlined above for determining individuals, advocacy organizations, and businesses LillyPAC contributions. LillyPAC support is who advocate to policymakers in support of issues divided between federal and state candidates. that promote these goals. Throughout the year, members of the company’s government affairs organization and employee Memberships LillyPAC members may bring forward specific In addition to direct political contributions, Lilly recommendations for LillyPAC contributions. also maintains memberships in organizations LillyPAC contributions are not required to be that report lobbying activity to the U.S. federal approved separately by the Chief Financial Officer government. Lilly is committed to supporting or General Counsel of Lilly. organizations that champion medical innovation. Lilly contributed $50,000 or more per year to the LillyPAC is funded by voluntary contributions from following organizations in 2011. Organizations eligible employees. All disclosure requirements are where the company has a board seat are noted to met that apply to LillyPAC. LillyPAC contribution reflect the greater degree of involvement in setting data are available to the public on the Federal priorities for those organizations. Election Committee (FEC) website (www.fec.gov), through the individual states’ agencies, and on the Memberships in 2011 include: Lilly website at www.lilly.com. Animal Health Institute (board seat), Biotechnology Industry Organization (board seat), Business Social Media Roundtable, Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Lilly has created a blog called LillyPAD (www. (board seat), Greater Indianapolis Chamber of lillypad.lilly.com). LillyPAD was created to Commerce (board seat), Healthcare Leadership begin a dialogue with the public on matters that Council (board seat), Indiana Chamber of Commerce are important to Lilly and those following the (board seat), National Association of Manufacturers biopharmaceutical industry. LillyPAD focuses (board seat), PhRMA (board seat), and US Chamber on public policy issues, corporate responsibility of Commerce. 2011 Lilly Political Contributions 4 Lilly Corporate Contributions 2011 Candidate Organization / Committee State Party Office Amount Alabama Republican Party - Non Federal Account AL R State Party $2,000 Sessions, David Friends of David Sessions AL R State House $500 Bledsoe, Cecile Cecile Bledsoe Campaign AR R State Senate $350 Dismang, Jonathan Jonathan Dismang Campaign AR R State Senate $350 Elliott, Joyce Joyce Elliott for Senate AR D State Senate $300 Files, Jake Jake Files Campaign AR R State Senate $200 Holland, Bruce Bruce Holland Campaign AR R State Senate $200 Hutchinson, Jeremy Jeremy Hutchinson for Senate Campaign AR R State Senate $200 Irvin, Missy Missy Irvin Campaign AR R State Senate $350 Key, Johnny Johnny Key for Representative Campaign AR R State Senate $200 Lamoureux, Michael Michael Lamoureux Campaign AR R State Senate $200 Pritchard, Bill Bill Pritchard for Senate Campaign AR R State Senate $350 Rapert, Jason Jason Rapert Campaign AR R State Senate $200 Rephan, Jerry Jerry Rephan for House District 24 AR D State House $250 Sample, Bill Bill Sample Campaign AR R State Senate $200 Summers, Tim Tim Summers for Senate AR R State Senate $250 Teague, Larry Larry Teague Campaign AR D State Senate $350 Thompson, Robert Robert Thompson for Senate AR D State Senate $250 Williams, Eddie Joe Eddie Joe Williams Campaign AR R State Senate $200 Lieu, Ted Ted Lieu for State Senate CA D State Senate $1,500 Accountability of Colorado CO D State House $500 Colorado Leadership Fund CO R State House $500 Senate Majority Fund CO R State Senate $500 Twenty-First Century Colorado CO D State Senate $1,000 Democrat Governor’s Association DC D Governor $10,000 Deleware Democratic Party - Non-Federal Account DE D N/A $5,000 Aubuchon, Gary Gary Aubuchon Campaign FL R State House $500 Berman, Lori Lori Berman Campaign FL D State House $500 Bogdanoff, Ellyn Senate Comm to Elect Ellyn Bogdanoff FL R State Senate $500 Brodeur, Jason Committee to Elect Jason Brodeur FL R State House $500 Corcoran, Richard Corcoran for Florida House of Representatives FL R State House $500 Crisafulli, Steve Committee to Elect Steve Crisafulli FL R State House $500 Detert, Nancy Committee to Elect Nancy Detert FL R State Senate $500 Dorworth, Chris Committee to Elect Chris Dorworth FL R State House $500 Flores, Anitere Committee to Elect Anitere Flores FL R State Senate $500 Florida Democratic Party - House Victory FL D State Senate $5,000 Florida Democratic Party - Senate Victory FL D State House $5,000 Frishe, James Jim Frishe House Campaign FL R State House $500 Garcia, Rene Rebne Garcia Senate Campaign FL R State Senate $500 2011 Lilly Political Contributions 5 Candidate Organization / Committee State Party Office Amount Goodson, Tom Tom Goodson Campaign FL R State House $500 Grant, James W. James W. Grant Campaign FL R State House $500 Grimsley, Denise Denise Grimsley State Senate Campaign FL R State Senate $500 Harrell, Gayle Gayle Harrell House Campaign FL R State House $500 Hays, Alan Committee to Elect Alan Hayes FL R State Senate $500 Holder, Doug Doug Holder Campaign FL R State House $500 Horner, Mike Mike Horner House Campaign FL R State House $500 Joyner, Arthenia Arthenia Joyner House Campaign FL D State Senate $500 Latvala, Jack Jack Latvala Campaign FL R State Senate $500 Negron, Joe Committee to Elect Joe Negron FL R State Senate $500 Passidomo, Kathleen Kathleen C. Passidomo Campaign FL R State House $500 Renuart, Ronald Ronald Renuart House Campaign FL R State House $500 Republican House Majority FL R State House $5,000 Republican Senate Majority FL R State Senate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Teachers, Commissioners Take Aim 12 Educators, 4 County Commissioners Challenging House, Senate Incumbents
    V19, N26 Thursday March 13, 2014 Teachers, commissioners take aim 12 educators, 4 county commissioners challenging House, Senate incumbents By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – The teachers are challenging in the House. The county com- missioners are doing the same in the Senate. Looking for trends heading into the November general election, 12 teach- ers, principals Democrat teacher Mela- and school board nie Wright (left) is in a members are seek- ing Democratic rematch with State Rep. nominations in the Jack Lutz) House, with re- In two other seats, HD21 where State Rep. matches coming in four districts: Timothy Wesco is facing Democrat Jodi Buoscio and in HD16 where Rensselaer School HD29 where State Rep. Kathy Kreag Richardson is facing Board member Richard Ludington is challenging State Rep. Joe Marcum, the Republicans ran unopposed in 2012. In Douglas Gutwein; HD35 where Melanie Wright came very HD28, State Rep. Jeffrey Thompson had no Democratic close to upsetting State Rep. Jack Lutz; in HD46 where opponent in 2012, easily defeated a Libertarian candidate James Mann will face State Rep. Bob Heaton, and in HD62 by more than 18,000 votes, and will face Sean Shanley where Democrat Jeff Sparks narrowly lost to State Rep. Matt Ubelhor. Continued on page 4 The sine die primer By MATTHEW BUTLER INDIANAPOLIS – Legislators who are Indiana and Purdue basketball fans will be too busy Thursday after- noon to watch their respective games only blocks away at the Big Ten Basketball Tournament. Instead, they are trying to meet the self-imposed “It’s completely optional for the deadline of 5 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Democrats Republicans 52 48
    V15, N42 Thursday, July 22, 2010 Battle for House takes shape Parties test outlier races, economy as Daniels engages By BRIAN A. HOWEY RISING SUN - The ad for Attica Clerk- Treauser Sharon Negele blipped up on Terre !"#$%&"'(&)"*"+%$$%&,-&."/$&0%%12&3$&4/&$5%&[7/$& Attica Clerk-Treasurer tangible electronic signal in the coming House Sharon Negele (left) Wars - the battle for the lower chamber which is challenging House will play a huge role in creating the reappor- Majority Caucus Chair- tioned Congressional and legislative maps for man Dale Grubb (top) the coming decade. in a race HPI viewed as “She’s more than just our neighbor,” a lower tier challenge. the voiceover states as it shows Negele greet- The HRCC is running ing neighbors, standing in front of an Attica TV to drive her name ID [7%&$7#81&"'(&09714':&4'&5%7&8"'(+&*"8$97+2& up, hoping the race be- “She’s someone we can count on. Instead of comes competitive if the a career politician, let’s send a trusted friend economy in languishing to represent us. After 22 years, isn’t it time to in the fall and a wave have a new voice for west central Indiana?” develops. (HPI Photo by & ;*&$5%&<=&[>%&97&/9&?%@#A.48"'&85". - A. Walker Shaw) Continued on page 3 How does Brad win? By DAVE KITCHELL LOGANSPORT - What is it exactly that a recent poll on the Indiana Senate race is expected to tell us? The Rasmussen poll, which trends Republican, tells us former Sen. Dan UThis election is going to be a Coats, a Republican who has not referendum on the borrowing, served in Congress in more than a decade, has a 51-30 lead over Brad spending, bailouts and take- Ellsworth, a Democrat who has been there for the past four.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Scorecard for the Oregon Legislature
    2011 envirOnmental scOrecard for the OregOn legislature O r e g O n l e a g u e O f c O n s e r v a t i O n v O t e r s yOu care abOut OregOn’s envirOnmental legacy. do your legislators? Oregon is our home. It’s a remarkable place to live, work, and play, but we can make it even better. For more than 30 years, with the support of our members across the state, the Oregon League of Conservation Voters has fought to protect our state’s great natural legacy for future generations. Part of our work is holding our elected officials accountable. And that’s where our Scorecard comes in. OLCV’s Environmental Scorecard shows how each legislator voted on critical conservation bills during Oregon’s 2011 Legislative Session. 1 find out. 2 get involved. 3 act. 4 tell your legislators you know the score. Your elected lawmakers answer to you. So whose side are they on: everyday Oregonians, like you, or special interests and big polluters? Join us and stand up for our home. For Oregon. Share this scorecard with your friends and family. Tell your legislators what you think. Together we can protect our home. Act now: www.olcv.org/scorecard ¡Tome acción!: www.olcv.org/calificaciones www.olcv.org/scorecard 3 Oregon’s 2011 legislative session: The Oregon League of Conservation Voters passes laws that protect Oregon’s environmental legacy, elects pro-environment candidates to office, and holds all of our elected officials accountable. OLCV Board Of directOrs Stephen Kafoury ChaIr Walt Gorman Treasurer Christine Lewis seCreTary Nancy Becker Steven Berman Nik Blosser Charlie Burr Nicole Cordan Robin Hartmann Progress and defense Ken Hayes Fred Heutte Margi Hoffmann Eric Lemelson in a tough climate Greg Macpherson Scott Pratt Given the often-contentious political divide in both Democrats and Republicans and received Andrea Salinas Oregon’s House and Senate, the budget crisis, and wide support in both legislative chambers.
    [Show full text]
  • Aim Master Bill Track Hb1002 Career and Technical
    AIM MASTER BILL TRACK Prepared by: Rhonda Cook Report created on January 18, 2019 HB1002 CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION MATTERS (SULLIVAN H) Establishes the career coaching grant program and fund. Provides that the governor's workforce cabinet (cabinet) shall administer the grant program and fund. Provides that the skills enhancement fund may be used to support cooperative arrangements between school corporations or charter schools and businesses if the cooperative arrangement leads to: (1) a postsecondary credential for a new hire; or (2) an increase of wages and a postsecondary credential for an incumbent employee. Provides that the cabinet shall receive, distribute, and account for all funds received for career and technical education under the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Act. Increases, from $500 to $1,000, the maximum work Indiana grant amount that may be awarded. Provides that a teacher who teaches a career or technical education course may be eligible to receive a pay supplement. Provides that each school in a school corporation and each charter school shall submit as part of a school's improvement plan to the department a summary of how the school will implement the career standards curriculum. Provides that the department of education (department) shall review the submitted plans every two years and may review a plan at random to review the relevancy of the plan to the changing economy. Provides that the department shall assist schools in incorporating best practices regarding the career curriculum from around the state. Provides that each student is required to enroll, in either grade 9 or grade 10, in either: (1) a course to prepare the student for college or a career; or (2) an introductory level career and technical education course.
    [Show full text]
  • July 27, 2018 Senate Campaign Finance Reports
    District Party Candidate Jan. 1-July 22 Raised Total Raised Jan. 1-July 22 Spent Total Spent Debts Cash On Hand Top Contributor 2nd Contributor 3rd Contributor 1 R Pauline Montie WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 1 D James Cole Jr. WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 1 D Nicholas Rivera WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 1 D Stephanie Chang $72,488 $147,043 $105,398 $107,008 $0 $40,035 Carpenters ($6,500) Henry Ford Health System ($2,250) Michigan Education Assoc. ($1,750) 1 D Alberta Tinsley Talabi $9,865 $9,865 $4,766 $4,766 $5,258 $5,099 Alberta Tinsley Talabi ($5,258) NICHOLSON ($2,000) Larry Brinker ($1,000) 1 D Stephanie Roehm 1 D Bettie Cook Scott 2 R John Hauler WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 2 D Tommy Campbell WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 2 D Lawrence E. Gannan WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 2 D LaMar Lemmons WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 2 D William Phillips WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 2 D Joe Ricci WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER WAIVER 2 D Adam Hollier $120,988 $120,988 $104,214 $104,215 $12,480 $25,850 Adam J. Hollier ($16,480.47) DUGGAN LEADERSHIP FUND ($15,000) David Fink ($2,000) 2 D Brian Banks $114,050 $156,875 $98,984 $106,522 $25,000 $50,353 Brian Banks ($33,500) MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE PAC ($11,500)OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 324 ($10,000) 2 D Abraham Aiyash $104,596 $104,596 $13,347 $13,347 $0 $91,249 WADHA AIYASH ($2,000) HAFAID GOBAH ($2,000) NASHWAN QURAY ($2,000) 2 D George Cushingberry Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Political Contributions
    2012 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2012 Lilly Political Contributions 2 Public Policy As a biopharmaceutical company that treats serious diseases, Lilly plays an important role in public health and its related policy debates. It is important that our company shapes global public policy debates on issues specific to the people we serve and to our other key stakeholders including shareholders and employees. Our engagement in the political arena helps address the most pressing issues related to ensuring that patients have access to needed medications—leading to improved patient outcomes. Through public policy engagement, we provide a way for all of our locations globally to shape the public policy environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines. We engage on issues specific to local business environments (corporate tax, for example). Based on our company’s strategy and the most recent trends in the policy environment, our company has decided to focus on three key areas: innovation, health care delivery, and pricing and reimbursement. More detailed information on key issues can be found in our 2011/12 Corporate Responsibility update: http://www.lilly.com/Documents/Lilly_2011_2012_CRupdate.pdf Through our policy research, development, and stakeholder dialogue activities, Lilly develops positions and advocates on these key issues. U.S. Political Engagement Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at the federal, state, and local levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives
    House of Representatives JON BURNS MAJORITY LEADER ROOM 338, STATE CAPITOL ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30334 December 4, 2020 SENT VIA EMAIL: Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger Chairperson of the State Election Board Mrs. Rebecca N. Sullivan Vice-Chairperson of the State Election Board Dear Secretary Raffensperger and Mrs. Sullivan, As I am sure you have seen over the past month, many Georgians, including my colleagues who have signed this correspondence, have serious concerns about Georgia’s elections. As we approach a critical election on January 5, 2021, it is clear that Georgia voters must have confidence in the election process going forward. To that end, below you will find two common-sense suggestions: a rule that should be promulgated by the State Election Board (the “SEB”) and additional resources of which the Office of the Secretary of State (the “SOS”) or the SEB could take advantage. I. Absentee Ballot Application and Mail-In Absentee Ballot Signature Review Process. As the process currently stands, when a voter wishes to vote early by mail, they submit an Absentee Ballot Application (“Application”) either through the mail or online. When a local Board of Registrars (the “BOR”) receives a paper Application, typically, a single employee of the BOR is responsible for the initial review of a signature on a paper Application. If that paper Application is accepted, the BOR mails an Absentee Ballot to the voter. The process for reviewing signatures on the external envelope of a returned Absentee Ballot is the same – a single employee of the BOR is allowed to “approve” a signature without oversight by other employees or independent observers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 EPAB Legislative Report
    Department of Administrative Services Enterprise Information Strategy and Planning Division John A. Kitzhaber, MD, Governor Membership Legislative Report Summary of activities under ORS 182.132 - Ability to offer Governors Public Appointments government services through portal; convenience fee from Ken Patchett January 2011 through December 2011 Data Center Manager, Facebook Sue Gemmell The Department of Administrative Services, with the advice of Intranet Manager, Mercy Corps the Electronic Government Portal Advisory Board, provides the Meredith Olson Graduate Student, PSU ability for state agencies to offer government services by Senate President Appointments means of a secure and usable electronic government portal and has contracted these services to an electronic government Bruce Starr Senator, District 15 portal provider. As recommended by the advisory board the Lee Beyer department may authorize an electronic government portal Senator, District 6 provider to charge a convenience fee for an electronic Speaker of the House of government service. Such fees reflect the costs incurred in Representative’s Appointments hosting, operating, maintaining or implementing the electronic Phil Barnhart government portal. State Representative, District 11 Central Lane and Linn Counties Activities of the Electronic Government Portal Advisory Kim Thatcher State Representative, District 25 Board: DAS Director Appointments • Received E-Government portal transition project updates. Dugan Petty • Received a briefing on the intent to award the E- State of Oregon CIO Government portal contract to NICUSA and of the phased Board Chairperson Dept. of Administrative Services contract development process. Michelle Gaines • Per ORS 182.128, reviewed and voted to recommend Strategic Initiative Manager approval of the E-Government Phase I Master Agreement Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 State House Legislative Districts
    20212021 GeorgiaGeorgia HouseHouse DistrictsDistricts 025 ( 985 046 §¨¦ 035 575 ( 24 ( §¨¦ 048 §¨¦ Towns ( (049 050 103 044 ( ( ( 097 DeWayne Hill (R-03) ( (102 045 Mike Cameron (R-01) Catoosa Fannin 036 034 ( Whitfield Rabun ( ( 101 Union 051 095 ( Stan Gunter (R-08) 043 ( ( Dade Jason Ridley (R-06) (037 §¨¦75 ( (096 Cobb (100 (105 (052 §¨¦59 285 042 §¨¦ Speaker 041 080 079 85 Gwinnett 107 Walker ( ( ( ( 099 ( David Ralston (R-07) §¨¦( Murray 081 Habersham ( Steve Tarvin (R-02) (040 (108 Kasey Carpenter (R-04) White 038 ( 054 106 Gilmer ( 082 ( ( 088 ( 094 053 ( Lumpkin Victor Anderson (R-10) (039 ( (087 Chattooga 061 085 Stephens ( Fulton ( 086 093 Gordon Will Wade (R-09) 20 ( DeKalb ( (114 Rick Jasperse (R-11) §¨¦ (056 066 Douglas Lauren McDonald (R-26) ( 057 Lee Hawkins (R-27) ( 083 285 Matt Barton (R-05) ( §¨¦ Pickens 058 Eddie Lumsden (R-12) (055 ( Franklin 20 (059 §¨¦ (092 Dawson 060 75 Hall Chris Erwin (R-28) Hart ( §¨¦ 089 Floyd (062 ( 084 Banks ( (091 Mandi Ballinger (R-23)Cherokee Wes Cantrell (R-22) Todd Jones (R-25) Matt Dubnik (R-29) Alan Powell (R-32) 675 (065 076 090 Mitchell Scoggins (R-14) (074 §¨¦ ( ( Forsyth §¨¦985 Jackson Rockdale Katie Dempsey (R-13) 85 077 Bartow §¨¦ 85 ( Tommy Benton (R-31) §¨¦ 075 Newton Tim Barr (R-103) ( Matthew Gambill (R-15) Emory Dunahoo (R-30) Madison 078 Brad Thomas (R-21) ( Sheri Gilligan (R-24) 064 109 Fulton Rob Leveret (R-33) ( (063 Clayton 75 ( Charlice Byrd (R-20) §¨¦ Elbert 071 Henry Polk Barrow ( Fayette Spencer Frye (D-118) (111 Jan Jones (R-47) Gwinnett Oglethorpe Chuck Efstration (R-104) Houston GainesClarke (R-117) Coweta Trey Kelley (R-16) Martin Momtahan (R-17) Cobb Terry England (R-116) Butts Paulding Joseph Gullett (R-19) Oconee Haralson Walton Lincoln Wilkes Tom Kirby (R-114) Mark Newton (R-123) Marcus Wiedower (R-119) Trey Rhodes (120-R) DeKalb Bruce Williamson (R-115) §¨¦20 Tyler Smith (R-18) Douglas Rockdale Micah Gravley (R-67) Greene Mandisha Thomas (D-65) Clayton Morgan Taliaferro J.
    [Show full text]
  • Sen. Long Releases Complete List of Standing Committee Assignments
    Page 1 of 12 For immediate release: Dec 05, 2008 Posted by: [Republican.Senate] Contact: Darrel Radford Phone: (317) 232-9498 Email: [email protected] Sen. Long releases complete list of standing committee assignments (STATEHOUSE) Dec. 5, 2008 - Senate standing committee rolls are now complete for the 2009 session of the Indiana General Assembly as President Pro-Tem David Long today made official the list of assignments. Last week, Long (R-Fort Wayne) made district-by-district announcements concerning Republican senator assignments. Long said Democrat senator assignments, released earlier this week, were made based on recommendations of Democrat Minority Leader Vi Simpson (D-Bloomington). Senators will reconvene for the 116th session of the Indiana General Assembly on Wednesday, Jan. 7. Enclosed is the complete list of standing committees. 2009-2010 STATE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES ========================================================== AGRICULTURE & SMALL BUSINESS Senator Johnny Nugent, Chair Senator Richard Young, R.M.M. Senator Allen Paul, R.M. Senator Bob Deig Senator Ron Alting Senator Lindel Hume Senator Mike Delph Senator James Lewis Senator Dennis Kruse Senator Jean Leising Senator John Waterman http://www.in.gov/portal/news_events/30544.htm 12/15/2008 Page 2 of 12 ========================================================== APPOINTMENTS & CLAIMS Senator Jim Merritt, Chair Senator Connie Sipes, R.M.M. Senator Sue Landske, R.M. Senator Earline Rogers Senator Richard Bray Senator James Lewis Senator Connie Lawson Senator Tom Wyss ========================================================== APPROPRIATIONS Senator Luke Kenley, Chair Senator John Broden, R.M.M. Senator Gary Dillon, R.M. Senator Lindel Hume Senator Phil Boots Senator Earline Rogers Senator Brandt Hershman Senator Karen Tallian Senator Teresa Lubbers Senator Patricia Miller Senator Ryan Mishler Senator Tom Wyss ========================================================== COMMERCE, PUBLIC POLICY & INTERSTATE COOPERATION Senator Ron Alting, Chair Senator Bob Deig , R.M.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Legally Trained Legislators
    2005 Legislature Legally Trained Legislators Legally Trained Legislators Despite what many people may assume, there are relatively few lawyers in the Oregon legislature. Only 12 of the 90 members of the 73rd Legislative Assembly have any formal legal education, and only 10 are mem- bers of the Oregon State Bar. State Elected Officials with Legal Training 12 Legally Trained Legislators in the 2005 Session Oregon Senate: Statewide Office Peter Courtney (D) Ted Kulongoski (D) Marion County Governor Kate Brown (D) Hardy Myers (D) Multnomah and Clackamas Counties State Attorney General David Nelson (R)* Information Numbers Umatilla, Wallowa, Morrow, and Union Counties Legislative Committees Charlie Ringo (D) (503) 986-1813 Washington County House Democratic Office Floyd Prozanski (D) (503) 986-1900 Lane and Douglas Counties House Republican Office Oregon House of Representatives: (503) 986-1400 Dennis Richardson (R) Senate Republican Office Jackson and Josephine Counties (503) 986-1950 Phil Barnhart (D) Senate Democratic Office Linn and Lane Counties (503) 986-1700 Robert Ackerman (D) Legislative Counsel Lane County (503) 986-1243 Dan Doyle (R) Distribution Center (for copies of bills) Marion County (503)986-1180 Betsy Johnson (D)* www.leg.state.or.us Columbia, Clatsop, and Tillamook Counties Oregon State Bar, Public Affairs Brad Avakian (D) (503) 620-0222 ext. 376 Washington County Governor’s Legal Counsel Greg Macpherson (D), (503) 627-7006 Clackamas and Multnomah Counties *Not a member of the Oregon State Bar ■ 2005 LEGISLATIVE TIPS HANDBOOK 13 2005 Legislative Committees 2005 Legislative Committees 2005 Legislative Committees 2005 Judiciary Committee 2005 Ways & Means Committee Senate Senate Sen. Ginny Burdick, Chair Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • S/L Sign on Letter Re: Rescue Plan State/Local
    February 17, 2021 U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 U.S. Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Members of Congress: As elected leaders representing communities across our nation, we are writing to urge you to take immediate action on comprehensive coronavirus relief legislation, including desperately needed funding for states, counties, cities, and schools, and an increase in states’ federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP). President Biden’s ambitious $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan will go a long way towards alleviating the significant financial strain COVID-19 has placed on our states, counties, cities, and schools, and the pocketbooks of working families. Working people have been on the frontlines of this pandemic for nearly a year and have continued to do their jobs during this difficult time. Dedicated public servants are still leaving their homes to ensure Americans continue to receive the essential services they rely upon: teachers and education workers are doing their best to provide quality education and keep their students safe, janitors are still keeping parks and public buildings clean, while healthcare providers are continuing to care for the sick. Meanwhile, it has been ten months since Congress passed the CARES Act Coronavirus Relief Fund to support these frontline workers and the essential services they provide. Without significant economic assistance from the federal government, many of these currently-middle class working families are at risk of falling into poverty through no fault of their own. It is a painful irony that while many have rightly called these essential workers heroes, our country has failed to truly respect them with a promise to protect them and pay them throughout the crisis.
    [Show full text]