DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Northwest Region ALMANAC2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States Department of Agriculture pacific northwest region ALMANAC2017 for the greatest good TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome to the Pacific Northwest Region . 1 Oregon/Washington Location Map . 4 THE FORESTS AND REGIONAL OFFICE Regional Office . 7 Colville National Forest . 8 Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area . 9 Deschutes National Forest . 10 Fremont-Winema National Forests . 11 Gifford Pinchot National Forest . 12 Malheur National Forest . 13 Mt . Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest . 14 Mt . Hood National Forest . 15 Ochoco National Forest . 16 Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest . 17 Olympic National Forest . 18 Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest . 19 Siuslaw National Forest . 20 Umatilla National Forest . 21 Umpqua National Forest . 22 Wallowa-Whitman National Forest . 23 Willamette National Forest . 24 WELCOME TO THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION’S WIDE RANGE OF DRAMATIC LANDSCAPES, ITS VAST ARRAY OF SPECIAL PLACES, AND ITS PEOPLE DISTINGUISH IT FROM OTHER AREAS OF THE UNITED STATES. INTRODUCTION DIVERSE LANDSCAPES CASCADE MOUNTAINS The Pacific Northwest, The Pacific Northwest The dramatic snow-capped The drier east-slope perhaps more than any Region includes the Cascade Range runs north vegetation includes other region in the United rugged-mystical Pacific and south .The northern ponderosa pine, red fir, States, is defined by its Coast, temperate Coastal portion of the range white fir, and lodgepole public lands . More than 30 Mountain rainforests, is increasingly rugged pine . Forest health has been percent of Washington and emerald green river and more influenced by adversely affected by the 53 percent of Oregon, are valleys, imposing volcanic glaciation . The upper lack of fire disturbance . managed by the Federal snow-capped mountains, mountain elevations receive The Northwest Forest Plan government . These lands and an expansive, arid, the highest amount of snow applies to this area . provide the people and andsunbathed high desert . in the continental United communities of the Pacific The Pacific Northwest States . Northwest their livelihood, is also characterized by an recreation, visual backdrop, abundance of mountain and identity . ranges, including the The Pacific Northwest Coast Mountains, the Region consists of 16 Cascades Range, and the National Forests, 59 Blue Mountains . Most of District Offices, a National the National Forests in Scenic Area, and a National the Region blanket these Grassland; comprising mountains, providing a an area 24 .7 million stunning backdrop for acres in size .There are nearby communities . Fifty- approximately 3,500 Forest seven mountains rise above Service employees living 8,000 feet in elevation . in the local communities, and working tirelessly to manage these lands . 1 — Almanac - PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION COASTAL RANGE The Coastal Range a factor . Here the forests consists of relatively low, are characterized by steep mountains running Sitka spruce . Extensive parallel to the coastline . logging influenced this The mountains receive landscape too . Management high rainfall, which of TE&S species, e .g .; supports moist forests of northern spotted owl, and western hemlock . Along marbled murelet remaina the coast, fog drip is also high priority for today’s managers . BLUE MOUNTAINS This area is marked by fir/Douglas-fir forests, wide, uplifted plateau, followed by ponderosa dissected by landslide and pine, lodgepole pine, and fluvial processes . Mesas western juniper . Fire, and buttes are common . and insect outbreaks are Vegetation patterns are major concerns for land complex with grand management . COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE Dramatic basalt headwalls, metropolitan area . The a vast river, cascading climate is dry to the east waterfalls, roaring winds, with sagebrush steppe and spectacular vistas part vegetation and moist to the Cascade Mountains the west with Douglas fir at the doorstep of the forests . Portland/Vancouver HIGH DESERT The High Desert extends steppe as the characteristic from the Cascades to vegetation, but also the Rockies .The climate includes fescues . Dry-land is dry, with sagebrush and irrigation agriculture dominate . 2 — Almanac - PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION WATER RESOURCES Almost every river, stream, nearby communities, and and tributary in the Pacific world-class recreation Northwest drains into for visitors . Rivers in the the Columbia River, save Pacific Northwest contain for the few that empty several species of salmon: into the Pacific Ocean, Chinook, coho, sockeye, Puget Sound, or Fraser chum, and pink, along River in Canada .These with two species of sea-run waters provide habitat trout (steelhead and coastal for native fish, water for cutthroat) . SPECIAL PLACES There are 111 rivers in the National Wild congressionally designated and Scenic Rivers System), areas in the National and 13 other areas (such Forest System in as National Recreation Oregon and Washington . Areas, National Volcanic 64 Wildernesses Monuments, and National (approximately 5 million Scenic Areas) add to the acres), 51 Wild and Scenic character of the Pacific Rivers (about 25% of the Northwest . PEOPLE The Pacific Northwest, the Pacific Northwest wish with its stunning beauty to recreate, they often look and vibrant diversity, is the to the National Forests perfect setting for those surrounding them . Pacific who call Washington and Northwesterners are Oregon home . defined by their outdoor The total population pursuits: from kayaking and of the two states is over windsurfing, to skiing and 11 million people, and snowshoeing . continues to grow . Much There are currently of that population lies 42 Federally recognized in the heavily forested Tribes with their traditional valleys west of the Cascade homelands in the two-state Mountains, primarily in the Pacific Northwest Region . Seattle/Tacoma corridor Most of the Tribes in the in Washington, and the Pacific Northwest Region Portland-Metro area in are actively involved with Oregon .When the citizens the National Forests . of these and other cities in 3 — Almanac - PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION Pacifi c Northwest Region MT. BAKER-SNOQUALMIE Bellingham North Cascades OKANOGAN COLVILLE N.P. Colville Paci c Northwest Region Paci 5 MBIA R U E OL IV Everett C R Lake Chelan ne Spoka Olympic N.P. Seattle River Spokane Wenatchee OLYMPIC 90 Spokane Tacoma Y ak im 90 a Olympia Mt. WENATCHEE Rainier N.P. R i v Yakima e e r k a n R S N i ve 5 r A GIFFORD E 82 C Astoria Longview Kennewick UMATILLA O PINCHOT Walla Walla RIVER Vancouver COL BIA 84 UM Pendleton Tillamook The r Portland e C v Dalles i I R r J Rive o F MOUNT h I n WALLOWA- C e Salem HOOD k a A n 5 UMATILLA S D WHITMAN P a Salem y e t t r ve Baker e Ri m City Newport la il Madras 84 W DESCHUTES OCHOCO Prineville SIUSLAW Prineville MALHEUR Vale Eugene Bend Vale Eugene WILLAMETTE Burns Coos Bay Coos Roseburg Bandon Roseburg UMPQUA 5 Burns Bay Crater Lake N.P. Lakeview FREMONT er SISKIYOU iv WINEMA R R E e V u g Grants Pass Ro I R Medford Medford Klamath Falls E Lakeview ROGU M00-00-01 LEGEND BLM District Boundary National Park Service BLM Administered Land Fish and Wildlife Service National Forest and Name OLYMPIC for the greatest good Washington and Oregon 4 — Almanac - PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION THE NATIONAL FORESTS OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST 5 — Almanac - PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION 6 — Almanac - PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION REGIONAL OFFICE A GREAT REGION TO LIVE AND WORK DID YOU KNOW? has transitioned from “custodial” in the early 20th According to the U .S . century, to focus on robust Forest Service in the Pacific Northwest, Edward T . timber production med- Allen was the first “District century, to management Forester” for what was then under the Northwest known as “District 6” . In Forest Plan, and increasing 1898, Gifford Pinchot met concern over fire, climate Allen—who was working •as a reporter for a Tacoma, change, water quantity and Washington newspaper— quality, and the role of the and convinced him to join Federal workforce . the Division of Forestry . In The Forests in Oregon 1908, Allen became District and Washington have Forester . During his one- always been important to year tenure, he upgraded the status of field personnel and Located in downtown Monuments, which total 13 the people who live in the worked with lumbermen and Portland, the Regional percent of the nation’s total Pacific Northwest . Nearly state officials to fight fire . Office oversees the National Forest System 10 million individuals rely National Forests in Oregon acreage . on the collective wisdom and Washington, including This Region has a and management of the some land in California and rich, controversial, and Region’s employees . It is a Idaho . Employees in the progressive history, often a humbling privilege to live, Regional Office support microcosm of the nation’s work, and serve in this 16 National Forests, a changing environmental stunning part of the world . National Scenic Area, a tastes and growing National Grassland, and pains . Management of two National Volcanic the forests in this region REGION FACTS PARTNERSHIPS: A CRITICAL PART OF THE REGION’S SUccESS 11 DIRECTOR AREAS Partnerships are to the the Region’s forests and appreciation and awareness ~3,550 FULL-TIME Pacific Northwest Region offices, contributing of the Forest Service’s REGIONAL EMPLOYEES as rain is to a rainforest more than 664,000 hours mission—are invaluable ~183 EMPLOYEES IN THE ecosystem: critical for and $15 .3 million in to Region 6 and we will REGIONAL OFFICE survival,
Recommended publications
  • Forests of Eastern Oregon: an Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann

    Forests of Eastern Oregon: an Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann

    Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann United States Forest Pacific Northwest General Tecnical Report Department of Service Research Station PNW-GTR-578 Agriculture April 2003 Revised 2004 Joseph area, eastern Oregon. Photo by Tom Iraci Authors Sally Campbell is a biological scientist, Dave Azuma is a research forester, and Dale Weyermann is geographic information system manager, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 620 SW Main, Portland, OR 97205. Cover: Aspen, Umatilla National Forest. Photo by Tom Iraci Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, OR April 2003 State Forester’s Welcome Dear Reader: The Oregon Department of Forestry and the USDA Forest Service invite you to read this overview of eastern Oregon forests, which provides highlights from recent forest inventories.This publication has been made possible by the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Program, with support from the Oregon Department of Forestry. This report was developed from data gathered by the FIA in eastern Oregon’s forests in 1998 and 1999, and has been supplemented by inventories from Oregon’s national forests between 1993 and 1996.This report and other analyses of FIA inventory data will be extremely useful as we evaluate fire management strategies, opportunities for improving rural economies, and other elements of forest management in eastern Oregon.We greatly appreciate FIA’s willingness to work with the researchers, analysts, policymakers, and the general public to collect, analyze, and distrib- ute information about Oregon’s forests.
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report

    Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report

    RECONNAISSANCE SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING OF THE LATE CENOZOIC SEDIMENTS OF THE COLUMBIA BASIN, WASHINGTON by James G. Rigby and Kurt Othberg with contributions from Newell Campbell Larry Hanson Eugene Kiver Dale Stradling Gary Webster Open File Report 79-3 September 1979 State of Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Olympia, Washington CONTENTS Introduction Objectives Study Area Regional Setting 1 Mapping Procedure 4 Sample Collection 8 Description of Map Units 8 Pre-Miocene Rocks 8 Columbia River Basalt, Yakima Basalt Subgroup 9 Ellensburg Formation 9 Gravels of the Ancestral Columbia River 13 Ringold Formation 15 Thorp Gravel 17 Gravel of Terrace Remnants 19 Tieton Andesite 23 Palouse Formation and Other Loess Deposits 23 Glacial Deposits 25 Catastrophic Flood Deposits 28 Background and previous work 30 Description and interpretation of flood deposits 35 Distinctive geomorphic features 38 Terraces and other features of undetermined origin 40 Post-Pleistocene Deposits 43 Landslide Deposits 44 Alluvium 45 Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Older Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Colluvium 46 Sand Dunes 46 Mirna Mounds and Other Periglacial(?) Patterned Ground 47 Structural Geology 48 Southwest Quadrant 48 Toppenish Ridge 49 Ah tanum Ridge 52 Horse Heaven Hills 52 East Selah Fault 53 Northern Saddle Mountains and Smyrna Bench 54 Selah Butte Area 57 Miscellaneous Areas 58 Northwest Quadrant 58 Kittitas Valley 58 Beebe Terrace Disturbance 59 Winesap Lineament 60 Northeast Quadrant 60 Southeast Quadrant 61 Recommendations 62 Stratigraphy 62 Structure 63 Summary 64 References Cited 66 Appendix A - Tephrochronology and identification of collected datable materials 82 Appendix B - Description of field mapping units 88 Northeast Quadrant 89 Northwest Quadrant 90 Southwest Quadrant 91 Southeast Quadrant 92 ii ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.
  • Central Washington V. Western Washington Central Washington University

    Central Washington V. Western Washington Central Washington University

    Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU CWU Athletics Events Programs CWU Athletics Collections Fall 10-21-1967 Central Washington V. Western Washington Central Washington University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/ cwu_athletics_event_programs Recommended Citation Central Washington University, "Central Washington V. Western Washington" (1967). CWU Athletics Events Programs. 35. http://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/cwu_athletics_event_programs/35 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the CWU Athletics Collections at ScholarWorks@CWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in CWU Athletics Events Programs by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@CWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. .. ~ ~ shington • '. ton .) y· ber 21, 1967 "Floral Designs for All Occasions" Remember, We're Closest to the College 510 North Ruby Phone 925-2166 or 962-9477 COACH TOM PARRY ARCTIC CIRCLE DRIVE-IN "The Home of the I 9c Hamburger" 8th and Walnut Phone 925-9292 COACH JOHN PEARSON • Your Health and Prescoiption Center - NOW TWO LOCATIONS TO SERVE YOU Ostrander's Uptown Medical Arts Pharmacy 4th and Pine 704 East Manitoba Phone 925-5344 Phone 962-9600 11 BUTCH HILL BILL'S BOWL Clean, Healthful Exercise Free Instruction Student Rates 900 North Poplar Phone 925-121 I 31 DENNIS ESSER "Best in Campus Wear" Phone 925-2 122 Ellensburg, Wash. 37 VINCE BROWN Central Washington State College Now in its 7 6th year, the College holds as its primary aim the preparation of professional ed­ ucators, and it has gained national recognition for its achievements. To reach this goal and to better serve the people of Washington, a strong liberal arts program also was develop­ ed under President James E.
  • Colville and Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forests Revised Forest Plans Frequently Asked Questions

    Colville and Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forests Revised Forest Plans Frequently Asked Questions

    Colville and Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forests Revised Forest Plans Frequently Asked Questions Plans and Planning Rule and Process Q. What is a Forest Plan? A. A forest plan, or land and resource management plan (LRMP), is a tool that provides a framework and broad guidance for making management decisions for a Forest unit, while providing technical boundaries for protecting the environment. They are strategic and programmatic, and identify desired conditions for national forest lands. Similar to county land- use zoning plans, they identify areas where various types of activities may occur, such as harvesting trees or certain types of recreational uses. Q. When were the existing Forest Plans approved? A. The Colville forest plan was completed in 1988, the Okanogan in 1989, and the Wenatchee in 1990. Q. Why revise current land management plans (LMPs)? A. Revision is required by law (NFMA, National Forest Management Act of 1976). The existing Forest Plans have reached their intended 15-year life. Both public comment and new science show some need for change to the existing Plans. Much has changed since the existing set of forest plans were approved in the late 80’s, including changes in public values and expectations from public lands, recreation demands and types of recreation uses, demographics and development patterns, and natural resource policy. Other changes have occurred on the landscape itself; and there have been advances in our knowledge about landscape processes, science and technology. Even though amendments have been made over time to the existing plans to adapt to some of those changes, they still do not fully reflect the current needs of the forest and neighboring communities.
  • Owl Mountain Wilderness Evaluation

    Owl Mountain Wilderness Evaluation

    May-June 2009 Owl Mountain Wilderness Evaluation WILDERNESS EVALUATION Owl Mountain – 621016 11,083 acres OVERVIEW History The 2006 inventory identified this area as meeting the criteria for a potential wilderness area (PWA) as described in Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.12, Chapter 70. The area had not been identified in any previous inventory. The following chart depicts the current 1988 Colville National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan direction for the 2006 inventoried area. Table 1--Management area percentages (rounded) Colville National Forest MA1 MA10 MA5 MA6 MA7 MA8 Old Growth Semi- Scenic Scenic/ Wood/ Winter Dependant primitive, Timber Winter Forage Range Species Motorized range Habitat Recreation 32% 37% 9% 12% 6% 3% Location and Access The Owl Mountain Proposed Wilderness Area (PWA) is contained wholly within Ferry County in T. 40 N., R. 35 E., Sec. 1, 12 13, 23, 24, and 25; and T. 40 N, R. 36 E., Sec. 3 – 10, 15 – 22, 27 – 31, and 34. The area is accessed on the east side through the Little Boulder/Independent Creek road systems, ultimately Forest Road 9576-370, which ends at a road closure on Huckleberry Ridge. There is no access from the north because of the Canadian border. The northeast side of the area is extremely rugged and steep and provides no access. Access from the southeast side is along U.S. Highway 395. However, very few people actually access the area from this side. The terrain on the lower slope is such that few hike up from the highway. Most of the access to this area is derived from driving into the heart of the Kerry Creek watershed on Forest Road 9576-150, which leads to the east end of Forest Trail 102 (Owl Mountain Motorized Trail).
  • Ecosystem Use by Indigenous People in an Oregon Coastal Landscape

    Ecosystem Use by Indigenous People in an Oregon Coastal Landscape

    3220 Donald B. Zobel, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331- 2902 e-mail: [email protected] Ecosystem Use by Indigenous People in an Oregon Coastal Landscape Abstract Data regarding probable uses of biological materials by the indigenous people of the Salmon River-Cascade Head area of the Oregon coast were used to estimate the peoples use of various ecosystems near villages. Of 308 uses identified, 256 were attributable to a given species; 124 species were identified. All local ecosystems were important sources of organisms for the people, with no apparent concentration of highly used species in any particular ecosystem. One species was cultivated, one domesticated, and five acquired by trade. Four major plant resources, camas, yew, hazel, and beargrass, are not known from the Cascade Head landscape, but may have been available from elsewhere in village territory. House construction without use of cedar planks, as indicated by ethnographic records, may have resulted from the paucity of western redcedar in the Salmon River lowlands. The scarcity of several widely used taxa near coastal village sites, especially western redcedar, may have limited the wealth of this indigenous population, even on the resource-rich Oregon coast. Introduction Tillamook, who resided near Cascade Head on the north-central Oregon Coast, in an area where Indigenous people used resources primarily from information about historic and modern plant and the landscape in which they resided. The natural animal species distribution is unusually complete. distribution of resources governed the pattern and The list of taxa used was compared to historic richness of their lives.
  • Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians

    Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1983 Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians Cynthia J. Manning The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Manning, Cynthia J., "Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians" (1983). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5855. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5855 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th is is an unpublished m a n u s c r ip t in w h ic h c o p y r ig h t su b ­ s i s t s . Any further r e p r in t in g of it s c o n ten ts must be a ppro ved BY THE AUTHOR. MANSFIELD L ib r a r y Un iv e r s it y of Montana D a te : 1 9 8 3 AN ETHNOHISTORY OF THE KOOTENAI INDIANS By Cynthia J. Manning B.A., University of Pittsburgh, 1978 Presented in partial fu lfillm en t of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1983 Approved by: Chair, Board of Examiners Fan, Graduate Sch __________^ ^ c Z 3 ^ ^ 3 Date UMI Number: EP36656 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
  • The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit May 2 – 3, 2018 | Lincoln Building Auditorium, Burns, OR

    The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit May 2 – 3, 2018 | Lincoln Building Auditorium, Burns, OR

    The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit May 2 – 3, 2018 | Lincoln Building Auditorium, Burns, OR The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit 2018 Linking Collaboration Efforts to Build a Best Harney County High Desert Partnership’s Mission Summit Vision The High Desert Partnership exists to cultivate collaboration and We believe this summit will provide a productive time for those support and strengthen diverse partners engaged in solving participating in collaborative work in Harney County to network, complex issues to advance healthy ecosystems, economic well- learn and look for opportunities to work together. Bringing together being and social vitality to ensure a thriving and resilient the collaborative initiatives will create synergy and the story of community. collaboration will reverberate in our community. The outcomes from this summit will lead to more resilient communities. Our Core Values o We believe in our collaborative process to address societal Goals of the Summit issues. o Increase the understanding of collaborative efforts in Harney o We believe in doing things right rather than right now. County. o We believe in recognizing the values of others. o Understand the links where initiatives can work together on o We believe in advocating for the process, not for outcomes. projects or programs. o We believe in taking a holistic approach: social, ecological and o Find the places for sharing resources. economic. o Grow the community's collaborative participation. o We believe that optimism is necessary to successfully address o Provide a venue for those in attendance to gain a better the challenges we face. understanding of the work of High Desert Partnership.
  • Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon – 2011

    Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon – 2011

    Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon – 2011 Submitted by The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. Title: Monitoring Wolverine in Northeast Oregon – 2011 Authors: Audrey J. Magoun, Patrick Valkenburg, Clinton D. Long, and Judy K. Long Funding and Logistical Support: Dale Pedersen James Short Marsha O’Dell National Park Service Norcross Wildlife Foundation Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Seattle Foundation The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. U.S. Forest Service Wildlife Conservation Society Special thanks to all those individuals who provided observations of wolverines in the Wallowa- Whitman National Forest and other areas in Oregon. We also thank Tim Hiller, Mark Penninger, and Glenn McDonald for their assistance in the field work. This document should be cited as: Magoun, A. J., P. Valkenburg, C. D. Long, and J. K. Long. 2011. Monitoring wolverines in northeast Oregon – 2011. Final Report. The Wolverine Foundation, Inc., Kuna, Idaho, USA. 2 INTRODUCTION The Oregon Conservation Strategy lists “species data gaps” and “research and monitoring needs” for some species where basic information on occurrence and habitat associations are not known (ODFW 2006; pages 367-368). For the Blue Mountains, East Cascades, and West Cascades Ecoregions of Oregon, the Strategy lists wolverine as a species for which status is unknown but habitat may be suitable to support wolverines. ODFW lists the wolverine as Threatened in Oregon and the USFWS has recently placed the species on the candidate list under the federal Endangered Species Act. Wolverine range in the contiguous United States had contracted substantially by the mid-1900s, probably because of high levels of human-caused mortality and very low immigration rates (Aubry et al.
  • O R E G O N North Pacific Ocean

    O R E G O N North Pacific Ocean

    412 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 9 31 MAY 2020 Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 7—Chapter 9 124° 123° NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage 18520 C O L http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml U M B I A 126° 125° 18521 R Astoria I V E R 46° Seaside Tillamook Head NEHALEM RIVER 18556 Vancouver 18558 TILLAMOOK BAY Portland Cape Lookout Cascade Head 45° SILETZ RIVER YAQUINA RIVER ALSEA RIVER 18581 18561 NORTH PA CIFIC OCEAN OREGON Heceta Head 44° 18583 SIUSLAW RIVER 18584 UMPQUA RIVER 18587 Coos Bay Cape Arago 18588 COQUILLE RIVER 43° 18589 Cape Blanco 18600 18580 Port Orford ROUGE RIVER 18601 CHETCO RIVER 42° 18602 CALIFORNIA 31 MAY 2020 U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 9 ¢ 413 Chetco River to Columbia River, Oregon (1) This chapter describes 200 miles of the Oregon coast rare clear skies; it is more likely in early winter. Winter from the mouth of the Chetco River to the mouth of the and spring winds are moderately strong, particularly south Columbia River. Also described are the Chetco and Rogue of Newport. From North Bend southward, winds reach 17 Rivers, Port Orford, Coquille River, Coos Bay, Umpqua knots or more about 5 to 15 percent of the time and 28 and Siuslaw Rivers, Yaquina Bay and River, Nehalem knots or more about 1 to 3 percent of the time. Extreme River and Tillamook Bay. The cities of Coos Bay and wind speeds usually occur in either winter or early spring North Bend on Coos Bay and Newport on Yaquina Bay and have climbed to around 50 knots.
  • DOGAMI Open-File Report O-16-06, Metallic and Industrial Mineral Resource Potential of Southern and Eastern Oregon

    DOGAMI Open-File Report O-16-06, Metallic and Industrial Mineral Resource Potential of Southern and Eastern Oregon

    Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Brad Avy, State Geologist OPEN-FILE REPORT O-16-06 METALLIC AND INDUSTRIAL MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF SOUTHERN AND EASTERN OREGON: REPORT TO THE OREGON LEGISLATURE Mineral Resource Potential High Moderate Low Present Not Found Base Metals Bentonite Chromite Diatomite Limestone Lithium Nickel Perlite Platinum Group Precious Metals Pumice Silica Sunstones Uranium Zeolite G E O L O G Y F A N O D T N M I E N M E T R R A A L P I E N D D U N S O T G R E I R E S O 1937 Ian P. Madin1, Robert A. Houston1, Clark A. Niewendorp1, Jason D. McClaughry2, Thomas J. Wiley1, and Carlie J.M. Duda1 2016 1 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, 800 NE Oregon St., Ste. 965 Portland, OR 97232 2 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Baker City Field Office, Baker County Courthouse, 1995 3rd St., Ste. 130, Baker City, OR 97814 Metallic and Industrial Mineral Resource Potential of Southern and Eastern Oregon: Report to the Oregon Legislature NOTICE This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or sur- veying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. This publication cannot substitute for site-specific investigations by qualified practitioners. Site-specific data may give results that differ from the results shown in the publication. Cover image: Maps show mineral resource potential by individual commodity.
  • Mountain Goat Population Ecology and Habitat Use Along the Juneau Access Road Corridor, Alaska

    Mountain Goat Population Ecology and Habitat Use Along the Juneau Access Road Corridor, Alaska

    Final Wildlife Research Report, ADFG/DWC/WRR-2012-02 Mountain goat population ecology and habitat use along the Juneau Access road corridor, Alaska Kevin S. White, David P. Gregovich, Grey W. Pendleton, Neil L. Barten, Ryan Scott, Anthony Crupi and Doug N. Larsen ©2005 ADFG/photo by Kevin White May 2012 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation Final Wildlife Research Reports are fi nal reports detailing the objectives, methods, data collected and fi ndings of a particular research project undertaken by ADF&G Division of Wildlife Conservation staff and partners. They are written to provide broad access to information obtained through the project. While these are fi nal reports, further data analysis may result in future adjustments to the conclusions. Please contact the author(s) prior to citing material in these reports. These reports are professionally reviewed by research staff in the Division of Wildlife Conservation. They are provided a number for internal tracking purposes. This Wildlife Research Report was reviewed and approved for publication by Rod Flynn, Reseach Coodinator for Region 1, for the Division of Wildlife Conservation. Wildlife Research Reports are available from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s Division of Wildlife Conservation, PO Box 115526, Juneau, Alaska 99811-5526; phone (907) 465-4190; email: dfg.dwc.publications@ alaska.gov; website: www.adfg.alaska.gov. The report may also be accessed through most libraries, via interlibrary loan from the Alaska State Library or the Alaska Resources Library and Information Service (www.arlis.org). This document should be cited as: White, K. S., D.