DOCSLIB.ORG

Drip Irrigation Salinity Management for Row Crops

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drip Irrigation Salinity Management for Row Crops University of California Making a Difference for California Agriculture and Natural Resources http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu Publication 8447 | June 2011 Drip Irrigation Salinity Management for Row Crops BLAINE HANSON, University of California Irrigation and Drainage Specialist Emeritus, UC Davis; DON MAY, UCCE Farm Advisor Emeritus, Fresno County In the past, California farmers have commonly used furrow and sprinkle irrigation to irrigate row crop plantings. More recently drip irrigation has come into increasing use in many other areas, including California’s coastal valleys and the west side of the San Joaquin Valley. Growers in some of these areas encounter high soil salinity caused either by irrigation with saline water (in the coastal valleys) or upward flow of saline ground water (in many parts of the San Joaquin Valley). Drip irrigation has the potential to increase crop yields with less irrigation water, and under saline conditions it has additional advantages over furrow and sprinkle irrigation systems. First, drip causes no foliar accumulation of salts during irrigation. Second, soil in the wetted area around emitters is mostly leached of salts, and that is often where root density is the highest, particularly for row crops. Third, high-frequency drip irrigation applications can maintain a relatively constant soil water content and soil salinity level over time near the drip lines. A disadvantage of drip irrigation is that salt accumulates near the periphery of the wetted area. This salt accumulation can be a matter of concern if the emitter placement does not coincide reasonably well with the location of the plant row, particularly for crops that are sensitive or moderately sensitive to soil salinity. Salt accumulation above buried drip lines also is a concern. Drip irrigation has been successful in the saline soils of the San Joaquin Valley. Experiments in commercial fields have proven subsurface drip irrigation of processing tomatoes to be a highly profitable practice (Hanson and May 2003, 2004), but if you want to reap the benefits of subsurface drip, you must also implement adequate salinity control. In this publication, we present guidelines for controlling salinity under drip irrigation. Drip Irrigation Salinity Management for Row Crops ANR Publication 8447 2 between relative yield (Y ) and EC is described by Crop Response r e this equation: The effect of soil salinity on crop yields is generally Y = 100 − b × (EC − EC ) (1) shown by a crop tolerance graph that shows no r e t effect on the yield until the soil salinity reaches where ECt is the threshold soil salinity (Table 1) and a threshold limit, beyond which there is a linear b is the slope of the graphed line that describes decline in yield as soil salinity increases (Maas and the relationship between Yr and ECe (Table 1). Grattan 1999). The common way to measure the Similar threshold values have been found for most salinity of irrigation water or soil is to measure its tree crops (Figure 1A), demonstrating that most electrical conductivity (EC), measured in deciSie- tree crops are sensitive to soil salinity (pistachio mens per meter (dS/m). For soil salinity (ECe), you and olive trees are two exceptions). Threshold measure the EC of a saturated paste solution of values vary considerably for row crops (Figure 1B), soil and water extracted from the soil. Threshold ranging from sensitive (strawberry and lettuce ) to soil salinity (ECt) is the highest ECe at which moderately sensitive (tomato and broccoli) to salt there is still no yield reduction. The relationship tolerant (asparagus, artichoke, and cotton). Actual ECe threshold values may be 1 to 3 dS/m higher for gypsiferous soils (soils with large amounts of 100100 gypsum) than those shown in Table 1. TreeTree andand Berry CropsCrops 8080 Table 1. Crop tolerance data for row crops likely to be grown with ) (%) r drip irrigation 6060 EC (threshold Crop t Slope “b” Rating* ECe in dS/m) 4040 Artichoke 6.1 11.5 MT Relative Yield (%) Yield Relative Almond (1.5) Peach (1.7) Relative Yield (Y Relative Yield Asparagus 4.1 2.0 T 2020 Plum (1.5) Apricot (1.6) Broccoli 2.8 9.2 MS Blackberry, Boysenberry (1.5) A Grape (1.5) 00 Cabbage 1.8 9.7 MS 0 1 22 33 4 5 66 77 Carrot 1.0 14.0 S ECECee (dS/m)(dS/m) Celery 1.8 6.2 MS 100100 Corn (sweet) 1.7 12.0 MS Cotton 7.7 5.2 T 80 80 Row CropsCrops Cucumber 2.5 13.0 MS ) (%) r 6060 Garlic 3.9 14.3 MS Strawberry (1.0) Lettuce (1.3) Lettuce 1.3 13.0 S Broccoli (2.8) 4040 Tomato (2.5) Muskmelon 1.0 8.4 MS Muskmelon (1.0) Relative Yield (%) Yield Relative Onion (1.2) Relative Yield (Y Relative Yield Pepper (1.5) Onion 1.2 16.0 S 2020 Artichoke (6.1) Cotton (7.7) Pepper 1.5 14.0 S B Spinach 2.0 7.6 MS 00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Strawberry 1.0 33.0 S ECEC (dS/m)(dS/m) ee Tomato 2.5 9.9 MS Figure 1. Crop salt tolerance relationships for (A) tree and berry * S = sensitive, MS = moderately sensitive, MT = moderately tolerant, T = tolerant crops and (B) row crops. Source: Maas and Grattan, 1999. Drip Irrigation Salinity Management for Row Crops ANR Publication 8447 3 Does drip irrigation reduce those that were used decades ago, as illustrated soil salinity’s effect? by some recent studies. One study on the effect Data from Maas and Grattan (1999) come from of salinity on the yields of 14 sweet corn cultivars studies using sprinkle or surface irrigation, many showed yields that range from 54 to 82 percent of which were conducted decades ago. For this of the maximum yield of each variety when the reason, we reviewed more recent literature on the plants were irrigated with a 6.2 dS/m irrigation effect of soil salinity or irrigation water salinity water (Pasternak et al. 1995). A recent study using on yield of drip-irrigated crops in order to under- 10 cultivars of processing tomatoes revealed stand the effect of drip irrigation on the salinity- relative yields ranging from 35 to 73 percent of yield relationship. the maximum yield of each variety for treatments Results of this review were mixed. Some that were drip-irrigated with a 6.0 dS/m irrigation studies showed that under drip irrigation the effect water (Gawad et al. 2005). Because of the variety from soil salinity on yields of lettuce, onion, and effect, it is difficult to make a blanket conclusion potato was smaller than would be expected on the that drip irrigation will or will not reduce the basis of earlier data. Other studies showed the yield effect of salinity on crop yield. Unfortunately, little response under drip irrigation for tomato, maize, information exists on the yield effects of varietal and bell pepper to be similar to that predicted by salt tolerance for crops grown in California. the earlier data. Drip irrigation causes less foliar salt accumulation than sprinkle irrigation, so it can Salt Distribution give better yields if the crop is sensitive to foliar salt (like peppers), while yields for more tolerant crops around Drip Lines (like cotton) remain unchanged. Wetting patterns One complicating factor when you compare and root distribution drip and non-drip systems is that soil salin- ity varies around drip lines, and that makes Salt distribution around drip lines is a reflection the estimation of salinity levels over time and of the wetting patterns during irrigation and the distance more difficult. For these comparisons, subsequent redistribution of soil water content. the researchers used average soil salinity values Wetting patterns around a surface drip line over time near drip emitters for the root zone (Figure 2A) and a subsurface drip line (Figure salinity levels. Another complicating factor is the 2B) just after an irrigation show that soil water difference in salt tolerance that is characteristic content varies around the drip line. The wettest of different crop varieties. The varieties in use soil is near the drip line and the driest is at the today may respond differently to salinity than periphery of the wetted pattern. Drip Irrigation Salinity Management for Row Crops ANR Publication 8447 4 Root distribution around drip lines also reflects wetting patterns. The roots of a row crop are highly concentrated near drip lines 0 (the zone of wettest soil) if the drip line place- 50 ment coincides with the plant row (Hanson 5 46 42 and May 2007). Drip lines that are offset from 10 38 plant rows may shift the zone of highest root 34 density away from the drip line. 15 30 26 Salt distribution Depth (inches) 22 20 Factors that affect root zone soil salinity 18 14 under drip irrigation include the salinity of 25 10 the irrigation water, the amount of water 6 applied, the soil’s hydraulic characteristics, 30 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 the placement of drip lines relative to plant Distance from drip line (inches) rows, and subsurface or surface placement of drip lines. Under saline, shallow groundwater 0 38 34 conditions, the groundwater depth and salin- ity are also factors. Near the drip emitter, soil 10 30 salinity will be the least and will reflect the 26 salinity of the irrigation water. Soil salinity 20 22 Depth (inches) increases with distance from the emitter so 18 that relatively large values can be detected 30 14 near the periphery of the wetted pattern. 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 Distance from drip line (inches) Under subsurface drip irrigation, salt also accumulates above drip lines.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Root Zone Salinity Modeling Within Kalaat El Andalous Irrigated District (Tunisia) Using Saltmod Model
    Root zone salinity modeling within Kalaat El Andalous irrigated district (Tunisia) using SaltMod model Ahmed Saidi 1*, Moncef Hammami 2, Hedi Daghari 3, Hedi Ben Ali4, Amor Boughdiri 5 1,3 Carthage University, National Agronomic Institute of Tunis, 43 Charles Nicolle Street, Mahrajene City, 1082 Tunis, Tunisia 2,5 Carthage University, Higher Agronomic School of Mateur, Road of Tabarka, 7030 Mateur, Tunisia 4Agency of agricultural investment promotion, 6000 Gabes, Tunisia Abstract—SaltMod simulations indicate a slight change of root zone salinity remaining between 3 and 6 dS/m and do not causes risks to forage and cereal crops. However, such salinity is causing a yield decrease of 10 to 20% for tomato crop. During the next 10 years, groundwater water table depth will range between 1.33 and 1.76 m. and remains lower than that of the root zone (0.6 m). Therefore, groundwater table will not pose problems as long as we keep the same management conditions during this period. Moreover, the simulation of drainage system depth variation impacts on root zone salinity indicates that a decrease of drainage lines depth does not affect root zone salinity which remains constant (4.94 dS/m and 3.68 dS/m respectively during the first season and the second season). Regarding groundwater table depth, it is noted that there is a variation for each drainage lines depth variation and groundwater level is ranging from 1.26 to 0.26 m and 1.76 to 0.76 m during the first season and the second season respectively. Thus, optimum drainage lines depth corresponds to that for which salinity and groundwater level have acceptable values not threatening crops and generating minimum drainage flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Transport Model for a Surface Irrigation System
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Applied and Environmental Soil Science Volume 2013, Article ID 957956, 10 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/957956 Research Article Sediment Transport Model for a Surface Irrigation System Damodhara R. Mailapalli,1 Narendra S. Raghuwanshi,2 and Rajendra Singh2 1 BiologicalSystemsEngineering,UniversityofWisconsin,Madison,WI53706,USA 2 Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India Correspondence should be addressed to Damodhara R. Mailapalli; [email protected] Received 16 March 2013; Revised 25 June 2013; Accepted 11 July 2013 Academic Editor: Keith Smettem Copyright © 2013 Damodhara R. Mailapalli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Controlling irrigation-induced soil erosion is one of the important issues of irrigation management and surface water impairment. Irrigation models are useful in managing the irrigation and the associated ill effects on agricultural environment. In this paper, a physically based surface irrigation model was developed to predict sediment transport in irrigated furrows by integrating an irrigation hydraulic model with a quasi-steady state sediment transport model to predict sediment load in furrow irrigation. The irrigation hydraulic model simulates flow in a furrow irrigation system using the analytically solved zero-inertial overland flow equations and 1D-Green-Ampt, 2D-Fok, and Kostiakov-Lewis infiltration equations. Performance of the sediment transport model wasevaluatedforbareandcroppedfurrowfields.Theresultsindicated that the sediment transport model can predict the initial sediment rate adequately, but the simulated sediment rate was less accurate for the later part of the irrigation event.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Drip Irrigation (Sdi) Systems
    NETAFIM USA SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION (SDI) SYSTEMS ADVANCED DRIP/MICRO IRRIGATION TECHNOLOGIES SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION QUALITY AND DEPENDABILITY FROM THE LEADERS IN DRIP IRRIGATION For over 50 years, growers world-wide have counted on Netafim for the most reliable, cost-effective and efficient ways to deliver water, nutrients and chemicals to their crops. This tradition continues with subsurface drip irrigation (SDI), the most advanced method for irrigating agricultural crops. With proper management of water and nutrients, a subsurface drip irrigation system can deliver maximum yields and optimal water use efficiencies. Drip irrigation, whether surface or subsurface, often results in increased production and yields as well as increased quality and uniformity. It provides more efficient use of the applied water resulting in substantial water savings. The flexibility of drip irrigation increases a grower’s ability to farm marginal land. WHAT IS SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION (SDI)? Subsurface drip irrigation is a variation on traditional drip irrigation where the dripline (tubing and drippers) is buried beneath the soil surface, rather than laid on the ground, supplying water directly to the roots. The depth and distance the dripline is placed depends on the soil type and the plant’s root structure. SDI is more than an irrigation system, it is a root zone management tool. Fertilizer can be applied to the root zone in a quantity when it will be most beneficial - resulting in greater use efficiencies and better crop performance. SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION (SDI) ADVANTAGES The key benefit of a surface micro-irrigation system is to apply low volumes of water and nutrients uniformly to every plant across the entire field.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Depth of the Vadose Zone Controls Aquifer Biogeochemical Conditions and Extent of Anthropogenic Nitrogen Removal Szymczycha B
    Depth of the vadose zone controls aquifer biogeochemical conditions and extent of anthropogenic nitrogen removal Szymczycha B1, 2*, Kroeger KD2, Crusius J3, Bratton JF4 1Institute of Oceanology Polish Academy of Sciences, Powstańców Warszawy 55, 81-712, Sopot, Poland 2USGS Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center, 384 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA 3USGS at UW School of Oceanography; 1492 NE Boat St.; Box 355351; Seattle, WA 98195 4LimnoTech, 501 Avis Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA *corresponding author Keywords: Excess air, recharge temperature, MIMS, groundwater discharge, dissolved organic carbon, denitrification Abstract We investigated biogeochemical conditions and watershed features controlling the extent of nitrate removal through microbial dinitrogen (N2) production within the surficial glacial aquifer located on the north and south shores of Long Island, NY, USA. The extent of N2 production differs within portions of the aquifer, with greatest N2 production observed at the south shore of Long Island where the vadose zone is thinnest, while limited N2 production occurred under the thick vadose zones on the north shore. In areas with a shallow water table and thin vadose zone, low oxygen concentrations and sufficient DOC concentrations are conducive to N2 production. Results support the hypothesis that in aquifers without a significant supply of 1 sediment-bound reducing potential, vadose zone thickness exerts an important control of the extent of N2 production. Since quantification of excess N2 relies on knowledge of equilibrium N2 concentration at recharge, calculated based on temperature at recharge, we further identify several features, such as land use and cover, seasonality of recharge, and climate change that should be considered to refine estimation of recharge temperature, its deviation from mean annual air temperature, and resulting deviation from expected equilibrium gas concentrations.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Drainage of Irrigated Lands
    ARBA MINCH UNIVERSITY Water Technology Institute Faculty of Meteorology and Hydrology Course Name:-Irrigated Lands Hydrology Course Code:- MHH1403 CHAPTER FOUR DRAINAGE OF IRRIGATED LANDS Prepared by: Tegegn T.(MSc.) Hydrology Objectives of the chapter • By the end of the session, the student will able to: – Understand what we mean by Agricultural drainage – Understand causes of excess water in agricultural lands – Know Problems and effects of poor drainage – Understand need of drainage – Know different types of drainage 4/21/2020 2 4.1 Definition of Drainage • Good water management of an irrigation scheme not only requires proper water application but also a proper drainage system. • Agricultural drainage can be defined as the removal of excess surface water and/or the lowering of the groundwater table below the root zone in order to improve plant growth. 4/21/2020 3 Cont… Class activity • Be in group and discuss on following topics – Causes of excess water or rise of water table – What are the effects of poor drainage – Why drainage is needed? 4/21/2020 4 Causes of excess water or rise of WT: • Natural Causes: – Poor natural drainage of the subsoil – Submergence under floods – Deep percolation from rainfall – Drainage water coming from adjacent areas. • Artificial Causes: – High intensity of irrigated agriculture irrespective of the soil or subsoil – Heavy seepage losses from unlined canals – Enclosing irrigated fields with embankments – Non-maintenance of natural drainages or blocking of natural drainages channels by roads. – the extra water applied for the flushing away of 4/21/2020 salts from the root zone. 5 4.2 Problems and effects of poor drainage • Drainage problem could be: – Surface drainage problem ---- when excess water builds up the water table and reaches to the ground level (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water and Groundwater Interactions in Traditionally Irrigated Fields in Northern New Mexico, U.S.A
    water Article Surface Water and Groundwater Interactions in Traditionally Irrigated Fields in Northern New Mexico, U.S.A. Karina Y. Gutiérrez-Jurado 1, Alexander G. Fernald 2, Steven J. Guldan 3 and Carlos G. Ochoa 4,* 1 School of the Environment, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia; karina.gutierrez@flinders.edu.au 2 Water Resources Research Institute, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA; [email protected] 3 Sustainable Agriculture Science Center, New Mexico State University, Alcalde, NM 87511, USA; [email protected] 4 Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-541-737-0933 Academic Editor: Ashok K. Chapagain Received: 18 December 2016; Accepted: 3 February 2017; Published: 10 February 2017 Abstract: Better understanding of surface water (SW) and groundwater (GW) interactions and water balances has become indispensable for water management decisions. This study sought to characterize SW-GW interactions in three crop fields located in three different irrigated valleys in northern New Mexico by (1) estimating deep percolation (DP) below the root zone in flood-irrigated crop fields; and (2) characterizing shallow aquifer response to inputs from DP associated with irrigation. Detailed measurements of irrigation water application, soil water content fluctuations, crop field runoff, and weather data were used in the water budget calculations for each field. Shallow wells were used to monitor groundwater level response to DP inputs. The amount of DP was positively and significantly related to the total amount of irrigation water applied for the Rio Hondo and Alcalde sites, but not for the El Rito site.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting an Irrigation System, You Need to Consider Both the Initial System Cost and the Op- Erating Costs of the System
    Sprinkler Irrigation Surface Irrigation Irrigation can be expensive. Before you install an irrigation system, it is very important to Sprinkler irrigation is a high pressure and high determine that increased yield and better crop flow irrigation system. Water is pumped and dis- quality will result in sufficient increase in income tributed through laterals and sprinkler heads. to offset the cost of installing and operating the This system is often used on small farms be- irrigation system. This starts with choosing the cause it is adaptable to a wide range of soil and right system. field conditions. Irrigation systems can be divided into four classes: Surface, Sprinkler, Drip and Subsurface. Before deciding what method of irrigation to use, it is important to know how much and the quality of water is available, the soil type and slope of your crop fields and what crops you plan to irrigate. Surface Irrigation, water is applied by flowing across the field in furrows. This is usually done where field slopes are flatter and the soils less sandy. The water must make it across the field without over-watering the up- per portions and without causing erosion. Sprinkler Irrigation Costs: When selecting an irrigation system, you need to consider both the initial system cost and the op- erating costs of the system. The exact cost can only be determined once a system is designed, but the following table can act as a guide: Well and Pump $5,000 to 10,000 each Traveling Gun $1,000 to $8,000/ ac Hand Move System: $2,000 to $3,000/ ac Drip System $2,000 to $4000/ ac Solid Set System: $4,000 to $8,000/ ac Subsurface $3,000 to $6,000/ ac Selecting an Irrigation System Selecting a System.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Simulating the Fate And
    DISSERTATION SIMULATING THE FATE AND TRANSPORT OF SALINITY SPECIES IN A SEMI- ARID AGRICULTURAL GROUNDWATER SYSTEM: MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION Submitted by Saman Tavakoli Kivi Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2018 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Ryan T. Bailey Co-Advisor: Timothy K. Gates Michael J. Ronayne Aditi Bhaskar Copyright by Saman Tavakoli Kivi 2018 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT SIMULATING THE FATE AND TRANSPORT OF SALINITY SPECIES IN A SEMI- ARID AGRICULTURAL GROUNDWATER SYSTEM: MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION Many irrigated agricultural areas worldwide suffer from salinization of soil, groundwater, and nearby river systems. Increased salinity concentrations, which can lead to decreased crop yield, are due principally to the presence of salt minerals and high rates of evapotranspiration. High groundwater salt loading to nearby river systems also affects downstream areas when saline river water is diverted for additional uses. Irrigation-induced salinity is the principal water quality problem in the semi-arid region of the western United States due to the extensive background quantities of salt in rocks and soils. Due to the importance of the problem and the complex hydro-chemical processes involved in salinity fate and transport, a physically-based spatially-distributed numerical model is needed to assess soil and groundwater salinity at the regional scale. Although several salinity transport models have been developed in recent decades, these models focus on salt species at the small scale (i.e. soil profile or field), and no attempts thus far have been made at simulating the fate, storage, and transport of individual interacting salt ions at the regional scale within a river basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Irrigation Performance on Water Balance: Krueng Baro Irri- Gation Scheme (Aceh-Indonesia) As a Case Study
    DOI: 10.2478/jwld-2019-0040 © Polish Academy of Sciences (PAN), Committee on Agronomic Sciences JOURNAL OF WATER AND LAND DEVELOPMENT Section of Land Reclamation and Environmental Engineering in Agriculture, 2019 2019, No. 42 (VII–IX): 12–20 © Institute of Technology and Life Sciences (ITP), 2019 PL ISSN 1429–7426, e-ISSN 2083-4535 Available (PDF): http://www.itp.edu.pl/wydawnictwo/journal; http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jwld; http://journals.pan.pl/jwld Received 07.12.2018 Reviewed 05.03.2019 Accepted 07.03.2019 Effects of irrigation performance on water balance: A – study design B – data collection Krueng Baro Irrigation Scheme (Aceh-Indonesia) C – statistical analysis D – data interpretation E – manuscript preparation as a case study F – literature search Azmeri AZMERI1) ABCDEF , Alfiansyah YULIANUR2) AD, Uli ZAHRATI3) BC, Imam FAUDLI4) BC 1) orcid.org/0000-0002-3552-036X; Universitas Syiah Kuala, Faculty of Engineering, Civil Engineering Department Jl. Tgk. Syeh Abdul Rauf No. 7, Darussalam – Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia; e-mail: [email protected] 2) orcid.org/0000-0002-8679-1792; Universitas Syiah Kuala, Faculty of Engineering, Civil Engineering Department, Banda Aceh, Indonesia; e-mail: [email protected] 3) orcid.org/0000-0001-8665-8193; Office of River Region of Sumatra-I, Lueng Bata, Banda Aceh, Indonesia; e-mail: [email protected] 4) orcid.org/0000-0002-4944-3449; Hydrology and hydraulics consultant; e-mail: [email protected] For citation: Azmeri A., Yulianur A., Zahrati U., Faudli I. 2019. Effects of irrigation performance on water balance: Krueng Baro Irri- gation Scheme (Aceh-Indonesia) as a case study.
    [Show full text]
  • Vadose Water
    Nimmo J R. (2009) Vadose Water. In: GeneAuthor's E. Likens, personal (Editor) copy Encyclopedia of Inland Waters. Volume 1, pp. 766-777 Oxford: Elsevier. Vadose Water J R Nimmo, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA Published by Elsevier Inc. Introduction the porous medium in an oven until the weight is constant, and then calculate how much water was The term vadose is derived from the Latin vadosus, in the soil from the difference between the dry weight meaning ‘shallow.’ In this sense, however, it refers to and the initial wet weight. Other methods in wide- shallow depths beneath the land surface, not shallow spread use have advantages, such as being less disrup- portions of surface water bodies. The vadose zone is tive. Neutron scattering is commonly used for frequently called the unsaturated zone, and some- monitoring y as a function of depth in the field. This times the zone of aeration, as its pore space usually method is based on the high effectiveness of water, contains air as well as water. The vadose zone extends among the various components of the wet soil, in from the land surface to the water table (the lowest slowing neutrons. Commercially available equipment water table if there is more than one). has a neutron source and detector housed in a cylin- Prediction of the transport rates of water and other drical probe that can be lowered to various depths in substances within the vadose zone is critical to infil- a lined hole. Another way to monitor y in the lab or tration, runoff, erosion, plant growth, microbiota, field is by measurement of the dielectric constant of contaminant transport, aquifer recharge, and dis- the medium, usually by time-domain reflectometry charge to surface water.
    [Show full text]
  • Constant Shallow Water Table Depth with Saline Ground Water
    Scientific Research and Essays Vol. 6(29), pp. 6068-6074, 30 November, 2011 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE DOI: 10.5897/SRE11.509 ISSN 1992-2248 © 2011 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Assessment of evaporation and salt accumulation in bare soil: Constant shallow water table depth with saline ground water Jalili, S.*, Moazed, H., Boroomand Nasab, S and Naseri, A. A. Faculty of Water Sciences, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, I. R. Iran. Accepted 9 May, 2011 Salinization of soil is a major problem in arid and semi-arid regions with saline shallow water table. This is influenced by climate, soil type, crop, irrigation water quality and management practice, depth of water table and salinity of the water table. The objective of this study was the assessment of evaporation and salinization of bare soil profile with various water table depths including 300, 500 and 800 mm by saline groundwater (3 g NaCl/L + 3.5 g CaCl2/l). In this research we were monitoring amount of evaporation from bare soil, and observing profiles of soil water and salinity over periods of up to 80 days. The experiments started on April, 10th, 2010. Results showed that, salts mainly accumulated in the soil surface and volume of evaporation from bare soil in lower water table depth (D = 300 mm) is greater than other lysimeters (D = 500 and 800 mm), and salt accumulation in this lysimeter was higher than others. After 80 days, amount of salinity (ECe) in soil surface was 83.84, 65.76 and 24.05 dS/m, for D = 300, 500 and 800 mm, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsaturated Zone Flow Processes, in Anderson, M.G., and Bear, J., Eds., Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences: Part 13--Groundwater: Chichester, UK, Wiley, V
    Nimmo, J.R., 2005, Unsaturated Zone Flow Processes, in Anderson, M.G., and Bear, J., eds., Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences: Part 13--Groundwater: Chichester, UK, Wiley, v. 4, p. 2299-2322, doi:10.1002/0470848944.hsa161, http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/ehs/articles/hsa161/frame.html. 150: Unsaturated Zone Flow Processes JOHN R NIMMO United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, US Water flow in the unsaturated zone is greatly influenced by unsaturated hydrostatics (water content, energy, pressure, and retention) and by unsaturated hydrodynamics (diffuse flow and preferential flow). Important multiphase processes include the transport of gases, nonaqueous liquids, and solid particles. Numerous means are available for determination of unsaturated conditions and properties, both measurement (of moisture state, water retention, and dynamic characteristics) and through various formulas and models that are mostly empirical in nature, but in some cases incorporating insight into unsaturated-zone physical processes. Applications to practical problems include models and techniques relating to distributions of water and energy, fluxes at the land surface, inputs, outputs, and fluxes within the unsaturated zone, all of which are frequently complicated by heterogeneity and preferential flow. Further scientific advance requires new measurement techniques and theoretical constructs that more adequately represent the important physical processes within practical modeling schemes. INTRODUCTION flow. The next section presents techniques for obtaining quantitative values of properties that influence unsaturated The unsaturated zone, sometimes called the vadose zone or flow, by direct measurement and by indirect means. The zone of aeration, plays several critical hydrologic roles. As third major section describes some of the main hydrologic a storage medium, it is a zone in which water is immediately applications related to flow in the unsaturated zone.
    [Show full text]