DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Election Results 1901–2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2014–15 17 JULY 2014 Federal election results 1901–2014 Stephen Barber and Sue Johnson Statistics and Mapping Section Executive summary During the period 1901 to 2014, there have been 44 general elections for the House of Representatives and 42 Senate elections. This paper contains a brief commentary on each election along with statistical summary information and results in each state and territory for each election. Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................... 1 Election dates .............................................................................................. 2 Introduction ................................................................................................ 3 Statistical highlights of the elections ............................................................ 4 Comments on individual elections ................................................................ 5 Tables ........................................................................................................15 Party abbreviations and symbols ..................................................................... 15 Detailed results: House of Representatives ..................................................... 16 Detailed results: Senate .................................................................................... 60 State summaries: House of Representatives .................................................. 102 State summaries: Senate ................................................................................ 120 Senate compositions ...................................................................................... 136 Two-party preferred votes: House of Representatives 1949–2013 ............... 141 Informal votes: House of Representatives ..................................................... 143 Informal votes: Senate ................................................................................... 144 Turnout: House of Representatives ................................................................ 145 Turnout: Senate .............................................................................................. 146 Sources .................................................................................................... 147 ISSN 2203-5249 Election dates Unless otherwise specified, elections were held for the House of Representatives and half of the Senate on the following dates: 1901 29-30 March House of Representatives and Senate 1903 16 December 1906 12 December 1910 13 April 1913 31 May 1914 5 September Double dissolution 1917 5 May 1919 13 December 1922 16 December 1925 14 November 1928 17 November 1929 12 October House of Representatives 1931 19 December 1934 15 September 1937 23 October 1940 21 September 1943 21 August 1946 28 September 1949 10 December 1951 28 April Double dissolution 1953 9 May Half-Senate 1954 29 May House of Representatives 1955 10 December 1958 22 November 1961 9 December 1963 30 November House of Representatives 1964 5 December Half-Senate 1966 26 November House of Representatives 1967 25 November Half-Senate 1969 25 October House of Representatives 1970 21 November Half-Senate 1972 2 December House of Representatives 1974 18 May Double dissolution 1975 13 December Double dissolution 1977 10 December 1980 18 October 1983 5 March Double dissolution 1984 1 December 1987 11 July Double dissolution 1990 24 March 1993 13 March 1996 2 March 1998 3 October 2001 10 November 2004 9 October 2007 24 November 2010 21 August 2013 7 September 2014 5 April Half-Senate, Western Australia Federal election results 1901–2014 2 Introduction This Research paper updates the Parliamentary Library’s Federal Election Results 1901–2010 paper published in 2011.1 It contains a summary of the federal elections—House of Representatives and Senate—held from 1901 to the latest half-Senate election in Western Australia in 2014.2 Brief comments on each election are provided in this paper, along with a series of statistical tables. Tables showing detailed state and territory results for each House of Representatives and Senate election contain: • figures for the number of electors enrolled • the number and percentage of votes received by party and • seats won by party. Votes received by party are expressed as a percentage of formal votes, while formal and informal votes are expressed as a percentage of total votes. Total votes are expressed as a percentage of electors enrolled in contested divisions. Enrolled figures represent the total number of electors enrolled in each state, while enrolled division figures represent the number of electors enrolled in contested divisions only. Other individual state and territory tables summarise the results for that state and territory at every House of Representatives and Senate election. These show, by party, the percentage of formal votes and seats won. Further tables showing Senate compositions, two-party preferred votes, informal votes and turnout at each Senate and House of Representatives election in the period are also included.3 This paper does not show by-election results. Information on by-elections since 1901 can be found in S Barber, 4 House of Representatives By-elections 1901–2014. 1. S Barber, Federal election results 1901–2010, Research paper, 6, 2011–12, Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 14 December 2011, accessed 25 June 2014. 2. For the purposes of this paper, the 2013 Senate election in all states and territories except WA and the 2014 WA Senate re-election are considered as one Senate election. 3. Turnout is the proportion of enrolled electors that voted; calculated by expressing the total number of votes (formal and informal) as a percentage of enrolled electors. 4. S Barber, House of Representatives by-elections 1901–2014, Research paper, 2013–14, Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 12 June 2014, accessed 25 June 2014. Federal election results 1901–2014 3 Statistical highlights of the elections Since 1901 there have been 44 House of Representatives Highlights elections and 42 Senate elections. The average length of time between House of Representatives elections has been 2 years Per cent Election and 7 months. Highest House of Representatives votes: Of the House of Representatives elections, non-Labor parties or ALP 50.9 1914 coalitions have won 30 and the Australian Labor Party (ALP) has LP 41.8 1975 won 14. Australian politics has been characterised by relatively NP 12.6 1922 long periods in government. Since 1930 there have been only DEM 11.3 1990 nine changes of government: 1932, 1941, 1949, 1972, 1975, GRN 11.8 2010 1983, 1996, 2007 and 2013. Lowest House of Representatives votes: Double dissolutions of both houses have occurred six times, ALP 26.8 1934 resulting in full Senate elections being held in 1914, 1951, 1974, LP 28.1 1972 1975, 1983 and 1987. Half-Senate only elections were held in NP* 3.7 2010 1953, 1964, 1967 and 1970. House of Representatives only * Previously 5.3 per cent in 1998; 2010 result affected elections were held in 1929, 1954, 1963, 1966, 1969 and 1972. by the NP and LP now running as a joint team, LNP, in Queensland. Since the introduction of proportional representation (PR) for Senate elections in 1949, the government of the day has only Highest House of Representatives seats: had control (a majority) in the Senate during 1951–1956, 1959– ALP 60.0 1983 1962, 1975–1981 and 2005–2007. On each occasion the LP 53.5 1975 Liberal/National (Country) Party Coalition was in government. NP 21.6 1937 An ALP government has not controlled the Senate since 1944– 1949, though the party did control the Senate during the period Government won with less than 50 per cent 1949–1951 while in opposition. of the two-party preferred vote: LP/NP 49.0 1998 LP/NP 49.3 1954 LP/NP 49.5 1961 LP/NP 49.8 1969 ALP 49.9 1990 Highest two-party preferred vote: ALP 53.2 1983 LP/NP 56.9 1966 Largest two-party preferred swing: ALP 7.1 1969 LP/NP 7.4 1975 Highest Senate votes (PR): ALP 50.6 1953 LP/NP 51.7 1975 DLP 11.1 1970 DEM 12.6 1990 GRN 13.1 2010 Lowest Senate votes (PR): ALP 34.3 2001 LP/NP 37.7 1998 Federal election results 1901–2014 4 Comments on individual elections (Simultaneous House of Representatives and half-Senate unless specified) 1901, 29 and 30 March Australia’s first Commonwealth election was essentially six separate elections held over two days, as each state conducted an election in accordance with its own electoral laws and practices. Three loosely-affiliated political groups contested the election: the Protectionists led by Edmund Barton, the Free Traders led by George Reid and a collection of Labor candidates. No one group attained the majority required to form government outright, with the Protectionists taking 31 seats in the House of Representatives, the Free Traders 28 seats, Labor candidates 14 seats and independents two seats. The Barton Protectionists formed government reliant upon the support of the Labor members. Reid and the Free Traders formed the official opposition. Labor candidates similarly held the balance of power in the Senate claiming eight seats to the Free Traders’ 17 seats and the Protectionists’ 11 seats. Labor’s general preference for Protectionist policy ensured a Senate that was generally supportive of the government. 1903, 16 December This was the first election held under Commonwealth electoral legislation. ‘First past the post’ was the electoral system. Once again no one political group gained a majority of Representative seats, with
Recommended publications
  • Senate Crossbench Background 2016

    Senate Crossbench Background 2016

    Barton Deakin Brief: Senate Crossbench 4 August 2016 The 2016 federal election resulted in a large number of Senators elected that were not members of the two major parties. Senators and Members of the House of Representatives who are not part of the Coalition Government or the Labor Opposition are referred to collectively as the Senate ‘crossbench’. This Barton Deakin Brief outlines the policy positions of the various minor parties that constitute the crossbench. Background Due to the six year terms of Senators, at a normal election (held every three years) only 38 of the Senate’s 76 seats are voted on. As the 2016 federal election was a double dissolution election, all 76 seats were contested. To pass legislation a Government needs 39 votes in the Senate. As the Coalition won just 30 seats it will have to rely on the support of minor parties and independents to pass legislation when it is opposed by Labor. Since the introduction of new voting reforms in the Senate, minor parties can no longer rely on the redistribution of above-the-line votes according to preference flows to satisfy the 14.3% quota (or, in the case of a double dissolution, 7.7%) needed to win a seat in Senate elections. The new Senate voting reforms allowed voters to control their preferences by numbering all candidates above the line, thereby reducing the effectiveness of preference deals that have previously resulted in Senators being elected with a small fraction of the primary vote. To read Barton Deakin’s Brief on the Senate Voting Reforms, click here.
  • Federal Election 1996

    Federal Election 1996

    DEPARTMENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY Parliamentary Research Service Federal Elections 1996 Background Paper NO.6 1996-97 • ~ l '-\< ~.r /~( . ~__J .. ~r:_~'_r.T-rr-Ji,_.~:;~;.~:~~;:;;~~~5!~'~ ;aft~::.u...- ... ~ . ..x-"\.~. ~'d__~ 4 ...,,--.;." .. _"'J,.gp. ..... !:l,;:.1t ....... ISSN 1037-2938 © Copyrigbt Commonwealth of Australia 1996 Except to the extent of the uses pemtitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. Tbis paper bas been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. Wbile great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. Tbe views expressed are those of the author and sbould not be attributed to the Parliamentary Researcb Service (PRS). Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. PRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Publisbed by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 1996 Parliamentary Research Service Federal Elections 1996 Gerard Newman Andrew Kopras Statistics Group 4 November 1996 Background Paper No.6 1996-97 Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Brien Hallett, Australian Electoral Commission, and JanPearson for their assistance in preparing this paper.
  • Australian Labor Party, New South Wales Branch Annual Conference, 29 – 31 March 1929

    Australian Labor Party, New South Wales Branch Annual Conference, 29 – 31 March 1929

    CHAPTER 7 Australian Labor Party, New South Wales Branch Annual Conference, 29 – 31 March 1929 Report in The Sydney Morning Herald One can detect that the Lang machine was already in election mode at the 1929 Conference and confident of victory. Almost no business was conducted and the meeting took only three days (allowing delegates to go to the races on Easter Monday!). No sign of disunity was allowed to develop. Part of the rationale given by the Executive was that the two preliminary regional conferences had done their work so well that there was little for the State Conference to do. However, it was almost certainly true that the Rural and Metropolitan Conferences had been stage‐managed as efficiently as the State Conference. The one matter of controversy that surfaced was some dissatis‐ faction with instances of graft in preselection ballots, leading to suggestions that these ballots should be abolished – with all decisions presumably to be made by the Executive. That proposal (originating from the radical left as a veiled criticism of Inner Group meddling) was not taken up, although the Inner Group would not hesitate to interfere, officially or unofficially, in any preselections not already sewn up. ξ 211 LABOR PAINS VOLUME V Executive Report of NSW ALP for 1928-29 (Mitchell Library Manuscripts, 329.3106/3) Australian Labor Party, State of New South Wales, Executive Report Ladies and Gentlemen: The 38th Annual Report and Balance-sheet of the Australian Labor Party, State of New South Wales, is hereby submitted for your consideration. Since the presentation of the last report many of the old Branches have been reconstituted, and the following new ones brought into being: Metropolitan Country South Bankstown.
  • The Political Career of Senator Paddy Lynch (1867-1944)

    The Political Career of Senator Paddy Lynch (1867-1944)

    With an Olive Branch and a Shillelagh: the Political Career of Senator Paddy Lynch (1867-1944) by Danny Cusack M.A. Presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch University December 2002 I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not been previously submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. ……..…………………………… Danny Cusack ABSTRACT As a loyal Empire man and ardent conscriptionist, Irish-born Senator Paddy Lynch swam against the prevailing Irish Catholic Labor political current. He was one of those MP’s who followed Prime Minister W.M. Hughes out of the Federal Labor caucus in November 1916, serving out the rest of his political career in the Nationalist ranks. On the face of things, he represents something of a contradiction. A close examination of Lynch’s youth in Ireland, his early years in Australia and his subsequent parliamentary career helps us to resolve this apparent paradox. It also enables us to build up a picture of Lynch the man and to explain his political odyssey. He emerges as representative of that early generation of conservative Laborites (notably J.C. Watson, W.G. Spence and George Pearce) who, once they had achieved their immediate goals of reform, saw their subsequent role as defending the prevailing social order. Like many of these men, Lynch’s commitment to the labour movement’s principles of solidarity and collective endeavour co-existed with a desire for material self-advancement. More fundamentally, when Lynch accumulated property and was eventually able to take up the occupation which he had known in Ireland – farming – his evolving class interest inevitably occasioned a change in political outlook.
  • Australia in the League of Nations: a Centenary View

    Australia in the League of Nations: a Centenary View

    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2018–19 21 DECEMBER 2018 Australia in the League of Nations: a centenary view James Cotton Emeritus Professor of Politics, University of New South Wales, ADFA, Canberra Contents The League and global politics beyond the Empire-Commonwealth . 2 The requirements of membership ...................................................... 3 The Australian experience as a League mandatory ............................ 4 Peace, disarmament, collective security ............................................. 6 The League and the management of international trade and economic policy ................................................................................ 10 The League’s social agenda ............................................................... 11 Geneva as a school for international affairs for some prominent Australians ......................................................................................... 12 The Australian League of Nations Union........................................... 13 The League idea in Australia ............................................................. 14 Discussion of the League in the parliament and the debate on foreign affairs .................................................................................... 16 Conclusions: Australia in the League ................................................ 19 ISSN 2203-5249 The League and global politics beyond the Empire-Commonwealth With the formation of the Australian Commonwealth, the new nation adopted a constitution that imparted to the
  • EAST METROPOLITAN REGION Group a - Independent - LARSEN

    EAST METROPOLITAN REGION Group a - Independent - LARSEN

    2021 WA Election – Legislative Council Tickets EAST METROPOLITAN REGION Group A - Independent - LARSEN Grp/Order Candidate Party 1 A 1 David Wayne Larsen Independent 2 A 2 Brian Brightman Independent 3 S 1 Hayley Doan Independent 4 T 1 Peter Lyndon-James Independent 5 R 1 Charles Smith Western Australian Party 6 R 2 James Anthony Western Australian Party 7 B 1 Brian Walker Legalise Cannabis WA 8 B 2 Karl Reinmuth Legalise Cannabis WA 9 C 1 Lidia Skorokhod Health Australia Party 10 C 2 Lisa Rowe Health Australia Party 11 D 1 Trevor Ruwoldt Shooters Fishers Farmers 12 D 2 Coby Thomas Shooters Fishers Farmers 13 E 1 Benny Tilbury Great Australian Party 14 E 2 Bradley Ward Great Australian Party 15 F 1 James McManus Daylight Saving Party 16 F 2 Mark Bradley Daylight Saving Party 17 H 1 Dale Grillo One Nation 18 H 2 Tim Orr One Nation 19 I 1 Patricia Ayre No Mandatory Vaccination 20 I 2 Daniel Hall No Mandatory Vaccination 21 J 1 Satinder Samra WAXit Party 22 J 2 Robin Singh WAXit Party 23 J 3 Monty Singh WAXit Party 24 K 1 Marilyn Lottering Liberals for Climate 25 K 2 R Smith Liberals for Climate 26 L 1 Amanda Dorn Animal Justice 27 L 2 Nicole Arielli Animal Justice 28 M 1 Craig Buchanan Liberal Democrats 29 M 2 Neil Hamilton Liberal Democrats 30 N 1 Maryka Groenewald Australian Christian 31 N 2 Jamie Van Burgel Australian Christian 32 O 1 Donna Faragher Liberal Party 33 O 2 Phil Twiss Liberal Party 34 O 3 Greg Halls Liberal Party 35 O 4 Daniel Newman Liberal Party 36 O 5 Jeremy Quinn Liberal Party 37 P 1 Tim Clifford The Greens 38 P 2 Caroline
  • Report of the Redistribution Committee

    Report of the Redistribution Committee

    The 2009 Proposed Redistribution of Queensland into Electoral Divisions Report of the Redistribution Committee Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Section 68 Table of contents Executive Summary 1 Direction for a redistribution of Queensland electoral divisions 2 Quota 2 Enrolment projections 3 Appointment of the Redistribution Committee for Queensland 4 Invitations to submit public suggestions and comments 4 Statutory requirements for the making of a proposed redistribution 6 Technical procedures 8 Analysis of population trends 8 Enrolment in existing divisions as at 19 February 2009 9 Analysis of enrolment trends 10 Enrolment projections for existing divisions as at 9 July 2012 12 General strategy 15 Public suggestions and comments 17 Guidelines for the naming of divisions 19 Name of new division 19 Proposed redistribution of Queensland – by division: 20 Proposed South-East Queensland (South) divisions 22 Proposed South-East Queensland (North) divisions 27 Proposed Country divisions 30 Conclusion 34 Table 1 – Determination of the quota 2 Table 2 – Enrolment projections at 9 July 2012 3 Table 3 – Queensland regions for proposed redistribution 16 Table 4 – Summary of movement of electors between divisions 17 Table 5 – Themes 18 Table 6 – Divisions in order of discussion 21 Table 7 – Enrolment of existing divisions 35 Table 8 – Summary of proposed divisions 36 Table 9 – General description of how proposed divisions are constituted 37 Graph 1 – Queensland population quotas from 1997 to 2009 9 Graph 2 – Variation from the enrolment quota as at end 19 February 2009 for existing divisions 11 Graph 3 – Variation from projected average enrolment as at 9 July 2012 for existing divisions 13 Map Projected enrolment for existing divisions as at 9 July 2012 14 Enclosures Sheet 1 – Maps 1 and 2 Sheet 2 – Map 3 Sheet 3 – Map 4 CD – Containing the public suggestions received and comments received on those suggestions.
  • Sir Joseph Carruthers in the History of Australian Liberalism

    Sir Joseph Carruthers in the History of Australian Liberalism

    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2016 Sir Joseph Carruthers in the history of Australian liberalism Zachary Kevin Kearney Gorman University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Gorman, Zachary Kevin Kearney, Sir Joseph Carruthers in the history of Australian liberalism, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong, 2016.
  • Earle Page and the Imagining of Australia

    Earle Page and the Imagining of Australia

    ‘NOW IS THE PSYCHOLOGICAL MOMENT’ EARLE PAGE AND THE IMAGINING OF AUSTRALIA ‘NOW IS THE PSYCHOLOGICAL MOMENT’ EARLE PAGE AND THE IMAGINING OF AUSTRALIA STEPHEN WILKS Ah, but a man’s reach should exceed his grasp, Or what’s a heaven for? Robert Browning, ‘Andrea del Sarto’ The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. Edward John Phelps Earle Page as seen by L.F. Reynolds in Table Talk, 21 October 1926. Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463670 ISBN (online): 9781760463687 WorldCat (print): 1198529303 WorldCat (online): 1198529152 DOI: 10.22459/NPM.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This publication was awarded a College of Arts and Social Sciences PhD Publication Prize in 2018. The prize contributes to the cost of professional copyediting. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover photograph: Earle Page strikes a pose in early Canberra. Mildenhall Collection, NAA, A3560, 6053, undated. This edition © 2020 ANU Press CONTENTS Illustrations . ix Acknowledgements . xi Abbreviations . xiii Prologue: ‘How Many Germans Did You Kill, Doc?’ . xv Introduction: ‘A Dreamer of Dreams’ . 1 1 . Family, Community and Methodism: The Forging of Page’s World View . .. 17 2 . ‘We Were Determined to Use Our Opportunities to the Full’: Page’s Rise to National Prominence .
  • The Importance of Boundaries

    The Importance of Boundaries

    The importance of boundaries Colin Hughes Emeritus Professor of Politic Science, University of Queensland Research Paper 1 (November 2007) Democratic Audit of Australia Australian National University Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia http://democratic.audit.anu.edu.au The views expressed are the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Democratic Audit of Australia. If elections are to be thought fair, their outcomes should correspond as closely as possible to the inputs of voter preferences. A particular percentage of the votes counted for a party should produce close to the same percentage of the seats won by that party. Down that path lie the topics of partisan bias and proportional representation with multi-member electoral districts as the most common solution. But there is a second criterion of fairness which is that outcomes should correspond to the numbers of electors or people to be represented. That criterion is often called equality, and down that path lie the topics of malapportionment and enforced equality as a solution. The two criteria may not work in the same direction.1 In Australia the problem of equality has been debated mainly with respect to the dichotomy of town and country, ‘town’ usually meaning the State capital(s) which have been invariably by far the largest urban center in each State and ‘country’ the rest, though sometimes the larger provincial cities and towns get lumped in with their local metropolis. Should town voters have the same quantity of representation, measured by the number of electors in the electoral districts, as country voters? There has also been a sub-plot, which is what this paper is about, that concerns the existence of a small number of electoral districts spread over exceptionally large areas in which the population, and consequently the numbers of electors, is relatively thin on the ground and widely scattered.
  • Kenneth Slessor Science, Sex and Mr

    Kenneth Slessor Science, Sex and Mr

    ESTERLY stories poems reviews articles Collage-Principle in Recent Australian Writing Kenneth Slessor Science, Sex and Mr. Wells Singapore Writing in English The Mysterious Fate of the "Aagtekerke" a quarterly revi ew price two dollars registered at gpo perth fo r transmi ssion by post as a peri odical Category' B' PATTERNS VOL4 n03 Fremantle Arts Centre poetry magazine published three times a year by the Fremantle Arts Centre with the assistance of the Literature Board of the Australia Council and with support from the Western Austral ian Literary Fund Now in its fourth year, PATTERNS publishes work from all over Australia and from New Zealand. It particularly welcomes work from Western Australian poets. The Winter 1978 number just published includes writing by Thomas Shapcott, Graeme Hetherington and Hal Colebatch Single copy $150 (postage 30c) annual subscription $540 including postage order from Fremantle Arts Centre 1 Finnerty St Fremantle 6160 WESTERLY a quarterly review EDITORS: Bruce Bennett and Peter Cowan EDITORIAL ADVISORS: Margot Luke, Fay Zwicky CONSULTANTS: Alan Alexander, Swami Anand Haridas (Harry Aveling) Westerly is published quarterly by the English Department, University of Western Australia, with assistance from the Literature Board of the Ausb'alia Council and the Western Australian Literary Fund. The opinions expressed in Westerly are those of individual contributors and not of the Editors or Editorial Advisors. Correspondence should be addressed to the Editors, Westerly, Department of English, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009 (telephone 3803838). Unsolicited manuscripts not accompanied by a stamped self-addressed envelope will not be returned. All manuscripts must show the name and address of the sender and should be typed (double-spaced) on one side of the paper only.
  • The Leader of the Opposition

    The Leader of the Opposition

    The Leader of the Opposition ‘…just as there can be no good or stable government without a sound majority, so there will be a dictatorial government unless there is the constant criticism of an intelligent, active, and critical opposition.’ –Sir Robert Menzies, 1948 The practice in Australia is for the leader of the party or coalition that can secure a majority in the House of Representatives to be appointed as Prime Minister. The leader of the largest party or Hon. Dr. H.V. Evatt coalition outside the government serves as Leader of the Opposition. Leader of the Opposition 1951 - 1960 The Leader of the Opposition is his or her party’s candidate for Prime National Library of Australia Minister at a general election. Each party has its own internal rules for the election of a party leader. Since 1967, the Leader of the Opposition has appointed a Shadow Ministry which offers policy alternatives and criticism on various portfolios. The Leader of the Opposition is, by convention, always a member of the House of Representatives and sits opposite the Prime Minister in the chamber. The Senate leader of the opposition party is referred to as the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, even if they lead a majority of Senators. He or she usually has a senior Shadow Ministry role. Australia has an adversarial parliamentary system in which the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition face off against one another during debates in the House of Representatives. The Opposition’s role is to hold the government accountable to the people and to Parliament, as well as to provide alternative policies in a range of areas.