DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter III: Karl Barth's Hermeneutics and Exegesis In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter III: Karl Barth's Hermeneutics and Exegesis In This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Disruptive Presence: The Ontology, Theology and Ethics of Reading the Bible as Scripture in Karl Barth’s Theological Exegesis Denni Boy Saragih Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 2015 Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis has been composed by me. The work presented in this dissertation is mine and has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Denni Boy Saragih July 2015 i Abstract The dissertation offers a new reading of Karl Barth’s hermeneutics in relation to the task of the church in reading the Bible as Scripture. The study argues that the distinctiveness of Barth’s hermeneutics lies in its complex coordination of several doctrinal loci in construing biblical hermeneutics. In this reading, the church’s interpretation of the Bible is theologically located in the reality defined by the Trinitarian decision to be God in Jesus Christ. The relationship between the Word of God and the word of man is decided by God’s election of God’s being in Jesus Christ. As a contribution to Barth studies, the work offers a corrective reading of Barth’s earlier account of biblical hermeneutics in the doctrine of revelation by drawing the insights of Barth’s later theological ontology in the doctrines of election and Christology. The church’s reading of scripture is reformulated in the ontology of being in becoming in which the freedom of God in revelation is coordinated with the history of God in Jesus Christ. As such, it maintains the continuity and the discontinuity between the biblical natural history and the divine address to the church. The practical implication of this approach is not a method of interpretation but an ethics of biblical interpretation as a human response to God’s communicative presence. As an activity of listening to the Word of God, the church’s reading of the Bible is marked by moral freedom in obedience and responsibility to the Word of God. But the divine presence is not only communicative but also commanding, and it remains “a disruptive presence” that challenges the church to be faithful to her calling as a creature of the Word of God. ii Lay Summary The dissertation offers a new reading of Karl Barth’s theology of interpretation. There are two major contributions of this dissertation to its academic community. First, it offers a new analysis of the structure and coherence of Barth’s theological hermeneutics as a contribution to Barth’s scholarship. Second, it offers a new analysis of the distinctiveness of Barth’s hermeneutics as a contribution to broader discussions of the conditions and aims of textual interpretation. In relation to the first, this work presents a synthetic account of Barth’s theology in relation to the task of the church to read the Bible as Scripture. It offers a new reading of Barth's hermeneutics by i) drawing upon the insights of earlier commentators on Barth's theology of the Word of God, but ii) reading and adjusting this material through the lens of Barth's subsequent work. Specifically, this work identifies and analyses the underlying intellectual commitments that forms Barth’s hermeneutics from its earlier development to its mature reformulation. In relation to the second, this work offers a new constructive account of Barth’s hermeneutics in sharp contrast to some other influential analyses of the dynamics of meaning and understanding. The work argues that the strength of Barth’s theology lies in its ability to coordinate several theological loci to formulate a complex account of human understanding. In this regard, this dissertation interprets Barth’s hermeneutics in his early theology, and analysed it in conjunction with his mature theology to provide a new constructive account. The synthetic result is strongly recommended for its theological specificity. The presentation of this new synthesis is structured as Barth’s ontology, theology and ethics of interpretation. The five main chapters of this study can be divided into two parts. Chapters 2-3 survey the scholarship and the background of Karl Barth’s hermeneutics. The purpose is to highlight the distinctiveness of his hermeneutics and the interrelation of various doctrinal loci in his early formulation of theological interpretation. Chapters 4-6 are a constructive interpretation based on a thematic reading of Barth’s later writings and a close examination of some important sections. The reading is an empathetic attempt to understand the logic of Barth’s hermeneutics within his theology as a whole, while also questioning and engaging Barth’s thinking in a wider context of hermeneutical and ethical theories. iii TABLE OF CONTENT Declaration ..................................................................................................................................... i Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... ii Lay Summary ................................................................................................................................ iii Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ vii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER II: PERSPECTIVES ON KARL BARTH’S HERMENEUTIC AND EXEGESIS ......................................................................................................................... 11 1. A Survey of Approaches to Karl Barth’s Hermeneutics ..................................................... 11 1.1. The non-hermeneutical proposals ..................................................................................... 12 1.2. The hermeneutical-oriented proposals .............................................................................. 14 1.3. The exegetical-oriented proposals ..................................................................................... 19 1.4. The genetic-theological proposals ..................................................................................... 24 1.5. The theological-historical proposals ................................................................................. 30 1.6. Conclusion: a dogmatic approach ..................................................................................... 35 2. Defining the task of theological interpretation of Scripture ............................................... 37 3. Defining ontology, theology and ethics ................................................................................ 41 CHAPTER III: KARL BARTH’S HERMENEUTICS AND EXEGESIS IN THE EARLY PERIOD ................................................................................................... 46 1. Barth’s exegesis and hermeneutics in the Epistle to the Romans ....................................... 50 1.1. The first step: historical exegesis ...................................................................................... 51 1.2. The second step: an attempt at understanding ................................................................... 57 1.3. Conclusion: Barth’s theological exegesis in the Epistle to the Romans ............................ 68 2. Barth’s Exegesis in other Commentaries ............................................................................ 69 2.1. The Resurrection of the Dead............................................................................................ 69 iv 2.2. The Epistle to the Philippians ........................................................................................... 73 2.3. The Gospel of John............................................................................................................ 75 2.4. Construing a paradigm for theological exegesis ............................................................... 80 3. Ontology, theology and ethics in Karl Barth’s early hermeneutics and exegesis ............... 81 3.1. The development of Barth’s ontology of interpretation .................................................... 82 3.2. Formulating a theology of interpretation ........................................................................... 86 3.3. Proposing an ethics of interpretation ................................................................................. 88 4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 90 CHAPTER IV: KARL BARTH’S ONTOLOGY OF INTERPRETATION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Currents in Reformed Theology Vol
    UNION WITH CHRIST Currents in Reformed Theology Vol. 4, No. 1 / April 2018 4, No. Vol. Westminster International Theological Reformed Seminary Evangelical Philadelphia Seminary uniocc.com Vol. 4, No. 1 / April 2018 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFORMED THEOLOGY AND LIFE Editorial Board Members Africa Flip Buys, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa Henk Stoker, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa Philip Tachin, National Open University of Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria Cephas Tushima, ECWA Theological Seminary, Jos, Nigeria Asia In-Sub Ahn, Chong Shin University and Seminary, Seoul, Korea UNION WITH CHRIST Wilson W. Chow, China Graduate School of Theology, Hong Kong Matthew Ebenezer, Presbyterian Theological Seminary, Dehra Dun, India Editorial Committee and Staff Benyamin F. Intan, International Reformed Evangelical Seminary, Jakarta, Indonesia Editor in Chief: Paul Wells Kevin Woongsan Kang, Chongshin Theological Seminary, Seoul, Korea Senior Editors: Peter A. Lillback and Benyamin F. Intan In Whan Kim, Daeshin University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, Korea Managing Editor: Bernard Aubert Billy Kristanto, International Reformed Evangelical Seminary, Jakarta, Indonesia Book Review Editor: Brandon D. Crowe Jong Yun Lee, Academia Christiana of Korea, Seoul, Korea Subscription Manager: Audy Santoso Sang Gyoo Lee, Kosin University, Busan, Korea Assistant: Lauren Beining Deok Kyo Oh, Ulaanbaatar University, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Copy Editor: Henry Whitney Moses Wong, China Reformed Theological Seminary, Taipei, Taiwan Typesetter: Janice Van Eck Australia Mission Statement Allan M. Harman, Presbyterian Theological College, Victoria, Australia Peter Hastie, Presbyterian Theological College, Victoria, Australia Unio cum Christo celebrates and encourages the visible union believers possess Mark D. Thompson, Moore Theological College, Newtown, Australia in Christ when they confess the faith of the one holy catholic and apostolic church, the body of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DIVINE PERFECTION of OMNIPRESENCE in the THEOLOGY of KARL BARTH the Reverend Elizabeth Jarrell
    A THEOLOGY OF SPATIALITY: THE DIVINE PERFECTION OF OMNIPRESENCE IN THE THEOLOGY OF KARL BARTH The Reverend Elizabeth Jarrell Callender A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. 1 July 2011 Abstract Throughout its history, the Christian Church has commonly assumed that God’s own being or nature is the opposite of ours. Human existence is conditioned by the spatial and temporal order of creation, so God is thought to be a-spatial and eternal. Yet this does not account adequately for the biblical witness concerning God. Karl Barth radically claims that God is not merely spatial but that God has His own space and even is His own space. Barth bases this assertion upon an actualistic epistemology instead of the metaphysical framework grounding much of the Christian Church’s conceptualizations of God. Barth defines spatiality as a characteristic way of lovingly and freely being personally present with another distinct being in a rightly ordered relation. Beyond the discussion on the perfection of omnipresence, Barth does not directly develop this perfection further. However, his theology of spatiality underlies much of his theology, evident in his use of spatial language. Additionally, apparently lacking in Barth studies or elsewhere is a comprehensive theology of space or spatiality that begins by concretely considering God’s own space and His perfection of spatiality. This thesis aims to develop an actualistic theology of spatiality through an expositional exploration of the spatiality of the triune God in the theology of Karl Barth, primarily from his Church Dogmatics.
    [Show full text]
  • David W. Congdon Curriculum Vitae | January 2019
    Congdon CV — 1 David W. Congdon Curriculum Vitae | January 2019 2502 Westbrooke Circle, Lawrence, KS 66045-4444 2008 SW 1st St, Lee’s Summit, MO 64081 [email protected] www.dwcongdon.com 785.864.6059 EDUCATION 2014 Ph.D., Systematic Theology, summa cum laude, Princeton Theological Seminary 2008 M.Div., Princeton Theological Seminary 2004 B.A., English Literature, summa cum laude, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT 2017–Present Acquisitions Editor, Political Science and Law University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 2017–Present Adjunct Instructor University of Dubuque Theological Seminary, Dubuque, IA 2012–2017 Associate Editor IVP Academic, Westmont, IL PUBLICATIONS Books 2016 The God Who Saves: A Dogmatic Sketch. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books. 2015 Rudolf Bultmann: A Companion to His Theology. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books. 2015 The Mission of Demythologizing: Rudolf Bultmann’s Dialectical Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. Congdon CV — 2 Edited Volumes In Press Converting Witness: The Future of Christian Mission in the New Millennium (coedited with John G. Flett). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. 2014 Karl Barth in Conversation (coedited with W. Travis McMaken). Eugene, OR: Pickwick. Book Chapters In Press “The Use of New Testament Scholarship in Twentieth-Century Theology.” In T&T Clark Companion to Christology, edited by Chris Tilling and Darren Sumner. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark. In Press “Desperatio Fiducialis: Barth and Bultmann on the Anthropological Significance of Revelation.” In Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933), edited by Christine Helmer, Bruce L. McCormack, and Heinrich Assel. In Press “Barth and Hermeneutics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Karl Barth, edited by Paul Dafydd Jones and Paul T.
    [Show full text]
  • Princeton Theological Seminary 6/19/10 12:07 PM
    Princeton Theological Seminary 6/19/10 12:07 PM HOME | PTS COMMUNITY | BLACKBOARD | WEBMAIL | SEARCH | A TO Z INDEX WELCOME, GUEST ( LOGIN) ABOUT PTS ACADEMICS ADMISSIONS ALUMNI/AE CONTINUING EDUCATION LIBRARY PUBLICATIONS PTS PEOPLE GIVE TO PTS PUBLIC EVENTS CALENDAR PRINCETON PROFILES PHOTO GALLERIES George Hunsinger Recipient of 2010 Karl Barth COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Publishing Process Award from Union of Evangelical Churches in Press Releases Logo and Identity Manual Germany Request Forms Princeton, NJ, June 18, 2010–George Hunsinger, Princeton Theological Seminary’s Hazel Thompson ‐ Graduation Announcement McCord Professor of Systematic Theology and a scholar on the work of Karl Barth, has been chosen as ‐ Photography the recipient of the 2010 Karl Barth Award by the jury of the Union of Evangelical Churches in the ‐ Poster Evangelical Church in Germany. Barth is widely recognized as the most important theologian of the ‐ Publishing twentieth century. ‐ Pulpit Supply According to the jury statement, Hunsinger is being “honored for ‐ Web Project his interpretation of Karl Barth’s theology and the political ‐ Wineskin testimony that resulted from it as well as his achievements as a teacher of theology.” He “has dedicated decades of his theological FOR THE MEDIA work to the interpretation of Karl Barth’s theology in the American Faculty Experts context.” By awarding him the Karl Barth Award, the Union of President‘s Biography Evangelical Churches honors Hunsinger as a “theological teacher in Statistics the full sense of the word,” and thanks him for his “ecclesial teaching in the sense of a truly generous orthodoxy, and a world‐ Web Photos for Download oriented interpretation and practice of [Barth’s] Church Dogmatics.” NEWS The award also recognizes that Hunsinger’s theological achievements are linked to his critical view of the present and to George Hunsinger Recipient of 2010 his political engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Debate Over Justification by Faith: Evangelicals and Catholics
    Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 20:1-2 (2009):112-146. Article copyright © 2009 by Norman R. Gulley. Debate Over Justification by Faith: Evangelicals and Catholics Norman R. Gulley Southern Adventist University 1. Biblical Understanding of Justification by Faith Paul says “they are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus” (Rom 3:24, RSV), for “a man is justified by faith apart from works of the law” (Rom 3:28 RSV), with even faith a gift (Rom 10:17). Humans are “justified by his blood” (Rom 5:9, ESV). Calvary was the “one act of righteousness” which “leads to justification and life for all men” (Rom 5:18b, ESV). “God made him [Christ] who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God” (2 Cor 5:21). Justification is found in Christ, and is received by faith. This has nothing to do with Christ’s faithfulness in the covenant which continues human membership in the covenant, as proposed by “New Perspectives on Paul” scholarship. Justification explains how one gets in (not how one stays in) the covenant. Justification is an entry level reality, having to do with how one is saved. The word justify in Hebrew (hitsdiq) and Greek (dikaioun) “never refer to the infusion of righteousness, that is the transformation of someone from being ungodly to being virtuous.” Justification is the same throughout humans’ history, in old and new covenant periods, because it is about the one eternal gospel (Rev 14:6).
    [Show full text]
  • Seminars in 2010
    Foundation for Reformed Theology Seminars in 2010 The Foundation sponsored thirteen ministerial study seminars in 2010. They read twelve different topics and met at eight different institutions in eight different states. Blakely, August 22–26, 2010, Montreat Conference Center, Montreat, North Carolina Option XVIII: The Christian Life Bohler, April 26–30, 2010, Montreat Conference Center, Montreat, North Carolina Option XXVI: The Theological Legacy of Reinhold Niebuhr Cottrell, May 3–7, 2010, Pittsburgh Theological Seminary, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Option XXII: Reformed Theology and the Family Coulter, November 3–7, 2010, Columbia Theological Seminary, Decatur, Georgia First Seminar: John Haddon Leith Evans & McLeod, April 5–9, 2010, Union Theological Seminary, Richmond, Virginia Reading: Christian Faith in Our Violent World Farley, January 25–29, 2010, Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena, California Option XXXI: John Calvin, Selected Readings Gardner, March 22–26, 2010, Austin Theological Seminary, Austin, Texas Option XXIX: The Reading and Preaching of the Scriptures in the Worship of the Christian Church Goodloe, April 12–16, 2010, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, New Jersey Reading: Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics, Volume I, “The Doctrine of the Word of God” Gordon, October 18–22, 2010, Davidson College, Davidson, North Carolina Option IX: Karl Barth for Preachers Johnson, October 11–15, 2010, Union Theological Seminary, Richmond, Virginia Option VIII: The Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds McCollum, April 26–30, 2010, Steamboat,
    [Show full text]
  • Theology Today
    Theology Today volume 67, N u m b e r 1 A p r i l 2 0 1 0 EDITORIAL Chivas and Jesus 1 JAMES F. KAY ARTICLES The Lord’s Supper and the Church’s Public Witness 7 J. TODD BILLINGS Kierkegaard’s Eucharistic Spirituality 15 OLLI-PEKKA VAINIO Kierkegaard’s Purity of Heart and the “Sunday-Monday Gap” 24 TRAVIS TUCKER Missional Church, Missional Liturgy 36 RUTH A. MEYERS CRITIC’S CORNER Orthodox and Modern: Just How Modern Was Barth’s Later Theology? 51 PAUL D. MOLNAR Let’s Speak Plainly: A Response to Paul Molnar 57 BRUCE L. McCORMACK THEOLOGICAL TABLE TALK Rome and the Holy Offices of Protestant Churches 66 JUSTUS GEORGE LAwLER BOOK REVIEwS Revelation: A Commentary, by Brian K. Blount 70 CRAIG R. KOESTER TT 67-1.indb 1 2/4/10 11:49 AM Calvin: A Brief Guide to His Life and Thought by Willem Van’t Spijker 71 SUZANNE MCDONALD Calvin: A Guide for the Perplexed, by Paul Helm 74 JAMES C. GOODLOE IV Political Grace: The Revolutionary Theology of John Calvin by Roland Boer 75 wILLIAM R. STEVENSON JR. Triune Atonement: Christ’s Healing for Sinners, Victims, and the Whole Creation, by Andrew Sung Park 78 SALLY A. BROwN Desire, Gift, and Recognition: Christology and Postmodern Philosophy, by Jan-Olav Henriksen 80 VELLI-MATTI KÄRKKÄINEN Hugh of Saint Victor, by Paul Rorem 83 BERNARD MCGINN Pain and Suffering in Medieval Theology: Academic Debates at the University of Paris in the Thirteenth Century by Donald Mowbray 85 CAROLINE wALKER BYNUM The Pastoral Luther: Essays on Martin Luther’s Practical Theology edited by Timothy J.
    [Show full text]
  • Covenant of Redemption in the Theology of Jonathan Edwards: the Nexus Between the Immanent and the Economic Trinity
    CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY COVENANT OF REDEMPTION IN THE THEOLOGY OF JONATHAN EDWARDS: THE NEXUS BETWEEN THE IMMANENT AND THE ECONOMIC TRINITY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY REITA YAZAWA GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2013 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan • 49546~4301 800 388-6034 fax: 616 957-8621 [email protected] www. calvinseminary. edu This dissertation entitled COVENANT OF REDEMPTION IN THE THEOLOGY OF JONATHAN EDWARDS: THE NEXUS BETWEEN THE IMMANENT AND THE ECONOMIC TRINITY written by REITA YAZAWA and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned readers: /' ~George M. Marsden,~a, Ph.D·~. Richard A. Mulier, Ph.D. ~ ... ~ SJeVe:M:StUdebaker, Ph.D. Rona~e~ Date Dean of Academic Programs Copyright © 2013 by Reita Yazawa All rights reserved CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ viii Chapter ONE INTRODUCTION: CRITICISM OF THE IMMANENT TRINITY IN CONTEMPORARY THEOLOGY ........................................................ 1 Present Status of the Problem ..................................................... 1 Statement of the Problem ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Election and Trinity
    WTJ 71 (2009): 53-81 ELECTION AND TRINITY JAMES J. CASSIDY I. Introduction . election is God’s self-election, God’s decision to be God in this way, in and as the man Jesus. The consequence is that God is the one who determines himself to be in relation to us through Christ.1 The current debate among Barth scholars concerning the Swiss theologian’s understanding of the relation between the Trinity and God’s decree is as stimu- lating as it is potentially useful for aiding the church to advance a robust Christian doctrine of God. At the heart of the debate is this question: Does God’s being in triunity constitute his divine act of electing, or,conversely,does God’s act of elec- tion constitute his essence as the triune God? The question could be posed another way: Does God’s act constitute his being or does his being constitute his act? The discussion has also spilled over into the area of Christology.How are we to understand the relation between the two natures of Christ? If election con- stitutes God’s being then we cannot speak of some abstract notion of the second person of the Trinity, the Logos asarkos, who is eternally self-existing without any necessary reference to being pro nobis. Therefore, the discussion has opened up a number of possibilities for refining and perfecting the church’s understanding of the person and work of Jesus Christ in our redemption. We will attempt to show that in this debate there are two mutually exclusive positions: a position that proves itself to be a more accurate interpretation of Barth, and a position that proves itself to be closer to the historic Christian posi- tion on the matter.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN R. BOWLIN Princeton Theological Seminary 64 Mercer Street P.O. Box 821 Princeton, NJ 08542 609-497-3665 (Office) 609-497-7
    JOHN R. BOWLIN Princeton Theological Seminary 64 Mercer Street P.O. Box 821 Princeton, NJ 08542 609-497-3665 (office) 609-497-7829 (fax) [email protected] Degrees Earned: Ph.D., 1993 Princeton University M.A., 1987 Princeton University M.Div., 1985 Union Theological Seminary, New York B.A., 1981 St. Olaf College _____________________________________________________________ Areas of Specialization: Christian Moral Theology (history and problems); Moral Philosophy (history and problems); Contemporary Social Ethics and Criticism; Modern Religious Thought _____________________________________________________________ Professional Experience: Robert L. Stuart Associate Professor of Philosophy and Christian Ethics, 2015- Rimmer and Ruth de Vries Associate Professor of Reformed Theology and Public Life, Princeton Theological Seminary, 2007-2015 Associate Professor of Religion, University of Tulsa, 1998- Director, University Honors Program, University of Tulsa, 2001-2004 Assistant Professor of Religion, University of Tulsa, 1990-1997 ______________________________________________________________ Professional Memberships: American Academy of Religion Society of Christian Ethics American Political Science Association _______________________________________________________________ Honors, Awards, and Fellowships: Henry Luce III Fellowship, 2010-2011 Senior Fellow, Emory University, Center of the Study of Law and Religion, 2006-2010 Visiting Scholar, Oklahoma Scholar-Leadership Enrichment Program, 2006 Lilly Endowment/Louisville Institute, Christian
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Macleod, "Amyraldus Redivivus: a Review Article," Evangelical Quarterly 81.3
    EQ 81.3 (2009), 210–229 Amyraldus redivivus: a review article Donald Macleod Donald Macleod is Principal of the Free Church College, Edinburgh. KEY WORDS: Amyraldus (Amyraut); Beza; Alan Clifford; Calvinism; Dort. Someone who chanced to see this book1 lying on my desk instantly quipped, ‘Are there still Amyraldians?’ The remark was natural enough in a day when old dis- tinctions are largely obsolete. Evangelicalism may still be riven, but the fault-lines are no longer those of yore. Calvinists and Arminians have been superseded by Dispensationalists, Charismatics, the Emerging Church and the Federal Vision. But, yes, there are still Amyraldians, marshalled by the crusading Dr. Alan C. Clifford of Norwich,2 editor of this collection of papers delivered at the 2006 Conference of the Amyraldian Association. Dr Clifford belongs to an interesting species: the ardent, passionate advocate of the via media. The overall purpose of these papers is in accord with this. They seek to portray Amyraldianism as the biblical middle way, offering a balanced alternative to both Calvinism and Arminianism. Unfortunately, advocacy of the middle way does not always imply moderation, and this book makes consider- able use of derogatory labels. Dr Clifford himself, in the introductory chapter (8), notes that, ‘up until about the year 1600 being an “Evangelical” and being a “Calvinist” meant one and the same thing.’ To Clifford, however, the term ‘Cal- vinist’ itself requires modulation. There is authentic Calvinism, namely Amyral- dianism; and there is the supplanter, variously designated as Bezan Calvinism, Owenite Calvinism, Extreme Exaggerated Calvinism, High Calvinism, Scholastic Calvinism, So-called Calvinism and Ultra Orthodoxy.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Introduction A number of years ago, when I was first exploring this topic and my interest in the Christian community in Karl Barth’s theological project, I shared this interest with a prominent contemporary theologian. ‘Karl Barth had an ecclesiology?’ he responded rhetorically, if not a bit sarcastically. In much contemporary theological discussion, Karl Barth’s theology of the church is seen either as a useless dead end or as a topic of little interest or import to more interesting themes in Barth’s theological corpus. In addition, Barth’s concept of the threefold Word of God is all too familiar terrain that could not possibly be worth any additional detailed engagement and re- visitation. This thesis runs counter to these two commonly held assumptions: that Karl Barth had a weak ecclesiology, and that nothing new or significant can be gleaned from a detailed study of the threefold Word of God in Barth’s theology.
    [Show full text]