DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on Best Practices on Public Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on Best Practices on Public Consultation EffectiVe Social Integration οf mobile EU citizeNs - EnVISION Report on Best Practices on Public Consultation Work Package 2 (Deliverable 2.3) Helping Hand Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Project Number: 826677-ENVISION REC-AG-2018 Start Date of the Project: 01/02/2019 Duration: 24 months Disclaimer Envision was funded by the European Union’s Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme (2014-2020). The content of this report represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility. The European Commission does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains. WP2 Introduction of a two-way approach on active participation using Work package: public consultation Type: Written report Dissemination level: Public Version: 2 Delivery date: 15/11/2019 Βest and good practices, Public Consultation, mobile EU citizens, active Keywords: participation. This deliverable aims to identify best and good practices of Public Consultations that either have already been validated through research Abstract: or on the field, or new practices that could meet the need for higher active participation of mobile EU citizens. Authors: Astiki Mh Kersoskopiki Etareia Helping Hand (HELPING HAND) Contents 1. Introduction - The EnVision project ........................................................................................ 8 2. Best Practices on Public Consultation - Structure of the deliverable .................................... 10 3. A brief history of public consultation process in the EU ....................................................... 12 3.1 EU online public consultations ............................................................................................... 16 3.2 Stakeholder consultation guidelines ...................................................................................... 18 4. Types of Consultation ............................................................................................................... 20 4.1 Informal consultation ............................................................................................................. 21 4.2 Circulation of regulatory proposals or consultation documents for public comment ........... 22 4.3 Public notice-and-comment ................................................................................................... 22 4.4 Public hearings ........................................................................................................................ 22 4.5 Advisory bodies and expert groups ........................................................................................ 23 5. Definition of Good Practices ..................................................................................................... 24 5.1 Definition of Best Practices ..................................................................................................... 29 5.2 Criteria for selecting the good and best practices .................................................................. 35 5.3 Transferability of Good and Best Practices ............................................................................. 36 6. Examples of Identified Good practices ..................................................................................... 37 6.1.1 A EUROPEAN BRIDGE TO PROMOTE RIGHTS AND CITIZENSHIP .......................................... 38 6.1.2 APProach Project ................................................................................................................. 42 6.1.3 Citoyens Actif - For active citizenship in Ile-de-France ........................................................ 49 6.1.4 CROSS OVER ......................................................................................................................... 54 6.1.5 CRISCO: CROSSROAD OF REGIONS - FOSTERING INVOLVEMENT OF ALL CITIZENS IN LOCAL LIFE TO IMPROVE SOCIAL COHESION .............................................................................................. 61 6.1.6 Improving Inclusion of EU Mobile Citizens (I) ...................................................................... 67 6.1.7 JOCICEF - Joint Citizens' Forces - Common European Future .............................................. 74 6.1.8 Local Welcome Policies EU Mobile Citizens ......................................................................... 80 6.1.9 MOVEACT ............................................................................................................................. 85 6.1.10 Participation Matters Project ............................................................................................ 90 6.1.11 People’s Corner .................................................................................................................. 96 6.1.12 WISE - WHILE INNOVATING AND STRENGTHENING EUROPE .......................................... 102 6.1.13 YOU4EU - CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 2.0 ............................................................................ 107 6.2 Good practices. Nontransferable examples ......................................................................... 113 6.2.1 ECAS crowdsourcing platform ........................................................................................... 113 6.2.2 EUact- “EP Elections and Beyond: Active Participation of EU Citizens at All Levels” ........ 118 7. Examples of Identified Best Practices ..................................................................................... 126 7.1 CONSUL ................................................................................................................................. 126 7.2 Debating Europe ................................................................................................................... 133 7.3 D-CENT .................................................................................................................................. 138 7.4 DEMOCRACIT Project ............................................................................................................ 144 7.5 European Citizens Crowdsourcing (EUCROWD) ................................................................... 150 7.6 FAIR EU Project/ Fostering Awareness, Inclusion and Recognition of EU Mobile Citizens’ Political Rights ............................................................................................................................... 155 7.7 ManaBalss.lv ......................................................................................................................... 160 7.8 MyEU ..................................................................................................................................... 163 7.9 Spaceu2019 ........................................................................................................................... 166 7.10 SynAthina ............................................................................................................................ 170 7.11 The portal osale.ee ............................................................................................................. 175 7.12 WeEuropeans initiative ....................................................................................................... 179 7.13 YourVoteMatters.eu ........................................................................................................... 183 8. Categorisation of good and best practices per EU country .................................................... 188 9. Cases of public consultation through European Commission’s website ................................ 189 10. Initiatives of engaging citizens to public consultation .......................................................... 190 11. Conclusions – Lessons learned ............................................................................................. 193 12. References ............................................................................................................................ 196 12.1 Reports, Studies and other physical material ..................................................................... 196 12.2 Online Material ................................................................................................................... 199 Contents of Tables Table 1: Database indicators selected on the basis of the 5 Minimum Standards…………………14 Table 2: Categorization of good practices……………………………………………………………………………104 Table 3: Categorisation of Identified Best Practice………………………………………………………………159 Table 4: Mapping EU member states participation per Project……………………………………………160 Contents of Figures Figure 1: Overview of Public participation procedures ................................................................. 15 Figure 2: Consultation tools .......................................................................................................... 16 Figure 3: General principles for consultation ................................................................................ 18 Figure 4: Types of consultation. .................................................................................................... 21 Figure 5: Overview of the criteria and elements that will be taken into consideration for the analysis of each practice. ............................................................................................................... 28 Figure 6: The Exclusion criteria assess the following aspects………………………………………..…………..24 Figure 7: Overview of Criteria for selecting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Citizens for Eur Pean Foreign Policy
    EUROPEAN CITIZENS FOR EURPEAN FOREIGN POLICY EUROPEAN CITIZENS FOR EURPEAN FOREIGN POLICY Igor Kovač and Karolina Praček (eds) European Citizens for European Foreign Policy Tile: European Citizens for European Foreign Policy Editors: Igor Kovač and Karolina Praček Proofreading: Aleš Lampe Design: Iztok Kham Publisher: Slovensko panevropsko gibanje Cesta v Prod 90, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia www.panevropa.si Print: Tiskarna Rotosi d.o.o. Tomačevo 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Ljubljana, December 2014 With the support of the Europe for Citizens Programme of the European Union This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 327(4)(082) 061.1EU:327(082) EUROPEAN citizens for European foreign policy / [editors Igor Kovač and Karolina Praček]. - Ljubljana : Slovensko panevropsko gibanje, 2014 ISBN 978-961-90892-4-8 1. Kovač, Igor, 1984- 276403712 EUROPEAN CITIZENS FOR EURPEAN FOREIGN POLICY Slovenian PaneuroPean MoveMent CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS................................................6 NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS .......................................8 INTRODUCTION: PANEUROPEAN FOREIGN POLICY Igor Kovač and Karolina Praček ......................................... 13 EUROPEAN CITIZENS FOR EUROPEAN FOREIGN POLICY Erhard Busek . 21 GEOPOLITICS AND EUROPEAN GRAND STRATEGY David
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Diomidis Spinellis Professor of Software Engineering Department of Management Science and Technology Athens University of Economics and Business September 17, 2021 CV — Diomidis Spinellis CONTENTS Contents 1 Personal and Contact Details 5 2 Education 5 3 Research Interests 5 4 Honours and Awards 5 5 Teaching Experience 7 6 Scientific, Professional, and Technical Activities 7 6.1 Memberships of Professional and Learned Societies .................... 7 6.2 Journal and Magazine Editorial Board Member ...................... 7 6.3 Service in Conference Committees ............................. 7 6.4 Other Professional Society Service ............................. 11 6.5 Selected Open Source Software Development ....................... 12 7 Publications 12 7.1 Books: Monographs and Edited Volumes .......................... 12 7.2 Theses ............................................ 13 7.3 Peer‐reviewed Journal Articles ............................... 13 7.4 Editor‐in‐Chief and Guest Editor Introductions ....................... 17 7.5 Magazine Columns ..................................... 18 7.6 Book Chapters ........................................ 20 7.7 Conference Publications .................................. 20 7.8 Letters Published in Scholarly Journals and Newspapers .................. 29 7.9 Technical Reports and Working Papers ........................... 29 7.10 Book Reviews ........................................ 30 7.11 Articles in the Technical Press and SIG Publications .................... 32 7.12 Invited Talks
    [Show full text]
  • Information Campaign for the 2014 Elections to the European Parliament in Slovakia
    INFORMATION CAMPAIGN FOR THE 2014 ELECTIONS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT IN SLOVAKIA 16 September 2013 - 25 May 2014 Presidential Debate (p5;25) Mr. Schulz visit (p2;22) Election Night (p3;27) European Parliament Information Office in Slovakia started the official information campaign for the 2014 Elections to the European Parliament in Slovakia in September 2013. Since then, almost 60 events, discussion forums, outdoor activities and dialogues took place in more than 20 towns and cities across the Slovak Republic. In addition, 6 nationwide competitions focusing on the European Elections were initiated. The most significant and interesting moments of our information campaign were definitely the visit of the EP President Martin Schulz in the Celebration of the 10th Anniversary of the EU membership in Bratislava on 30 April 2014, Election Night dedicated to the official announcement of the results of the 2014 Elections to the European Parliament in Slovakia on 25 May 2014 in the EPIO´s office in Bratislava, four outdoor events dedicated to the Celebration of the 10th Anniversary of the Slovak membership in the EU accompanied by the information campaign to the EE2014 taking place from April to May in four largest Slovak towns (Bratislava, Košice, Banská Bystrica and Žilina) and the watching of live stream of the Presidential Debate accompanied by analytical discussions on 15 May 2014. These activities caught the attention of hundreds of Slovaks who directly participated in them and other thousands of citizens who expressed their interest for our activities through social media. CONTENT I. Most significant moments of the EE2014 Information Campaign in Slovakia.............................
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae Personal Information Last Name Drakontis First Name Panagiotis Father's Name Themistoklis Date of Birth September 26, 1986 Citizenship Greek Marital Status Single Military Status Completed compulsory military service Home Address Doukissis Plakentias 78, Athens, Greece Phone Number +30 2117008169 Mobile +30 6932488424 E-mail [email protected] Skype drakontis.panagiotis Academic Preparation 2005 - 2010 Technological Educational Institute of Larissa Department of Computer Science and Telecommunications Award title BSc Computer Science and Telecommunications Engineer Dissertation Development of Web Application for online hotel room booking, using Ruby and the Web Framework Ruby On Rails. Drakontis Panagiotis Page 1​ ​of 4​ Professional Experience Company name Giaola Division Team Leader and Senior Backend Engineer Department head Panagiotis Matsinopoulos / George Drakopoulos Field of work July 2018 – July 2019 Member of the team that develops the company’s booking system using Python and Django. August 2019 – Present Technical Team Leader of the team that develops the company’s booking system. Duration July 2018 – Present Company name E-Travel S.A. Division Software Engineer Department head Nick Bitounis Field of work March 2012 – January 2017 Member of the team that developed the company’s CRM/Operations system using Ruby On Rails. January 2017 – November 2017 Member of the team that is responsible for the Frontend part of the company’s site using Ruby On Rails. November 2017 – June 2018 Member of the team that developed the company’s CRM/Operations system using Ruby On Rails. Duration March 2012 – June 2018 Company name Tech Career Booster Division CTO / Co-founder Field of work Responsible for developing the application for Tech Career Booster using Ruby On Rails.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Ahead for Bosnia and Herzegovina: New Opportunities Or the Preservation of the Status Quo?
    DISCUSSION PAPER APRIL 2021 ROAD AHEAD FOR BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: NEW OPPORTUNITIES OR THE PRESERVATION OF THE STATUS QUO? Authors: Anida Sabanovic, Emina Kuhinja, Haris Cutahija I. Introduction General Affairs of the European Union accepted the request of Bosnia and Herzegovina for membership This paper discusses the European integration in the European Union and gave an order to the process in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), mapping European Commission to develop a questionnaire out the current challenges it faces in parallel with for BiH (1) which was handed to the country in the European Union (EU) challenges and at the end December. Bosnia and Herzegovina’s authorities provides recommendations on what could the delivered the answers to the Questionnaire and the European Union do to accelerate the process. European Commission adopted its strategy for “A Bosnia and Herzegovina is a potential candidate for credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced the EU and is currently at the bottom of the scale in EU engagement with the Western Balkans” in the region by progress. However, recent period has February 2018. The following year, in May 2019, brought new challenges, with emphasis on the the European Commission issued its Opinion on COVID-19 crisis and its possible long-term Bosnia and Herzegovina’s application for EU consequences for both the EU and BiH, affecting membership. (2) The Opinion is a milestone in EU- the current situation and raising questions on the Bosnia and Herzegovina relations, confirming that future of integration process, from one side, and the EU is committed to guide and support the enlargement from the other.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Applying the Bureaucratic Brakes' from the Luxemburger Wort (22 May 1999)
    'Applying the bureaucratic brakes' from the Luxemburger Wort (22 May 1999) Caption: On 22 May 1999, the daily newspaper Luxemburger Wort publishes an article by Archduke Otto von Habsburg, outgoing MEP and President of the International Paneuropean Union, in which he deplores the obstacles to the enlargement of the European Union to include the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEECs). Source: Luxemburger Wort. Für Wahrheit und Recht. 22-23.05.1999, n° 117; 152. Jg. Luxembourg: Imprimerie Saint-Paul. "Bürokratische Bremsklötze", auteur:Habsburg, Otto. Copyright: (c) Translation CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/applying_the_bureaucratic_brakes_from_the_luxemburger_ wort_22_may_1999-en-e9d31326-6b86-4d1a-8eb0-3a23ab3f12bd.html Last updated: 05/07/2016 1/3 Applying the bureaucratic brakes by Otto Habsburg The negotiations on enlargement of the European Union are now entering a decisive stage. It has emerged from the studies concerning the candidates for accession that under many chapters things are, with few exceptions, going substantially better than had been expected at the outset. And while fairly tough problems will now have to be addressed in some areas, it should be possible to clear these within the available time. That at least is the view taken by the European Commission experts charged with the negotiations. The opponents of enlargement are doing what they can to create obstacles, no longer in the hope of preventing the decisive step being taken but rather with a view to putting off the fateful day.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Bulletin Mensuel D'information Du Comité Français Pour L'union Paneuropéenne (July 1965)
    'Crisis in the Common Market' from the Bulletin mensuel d'information du Comité français pour l'Union paneuropéenne (July 1965) Caption: In July 1965, the French Committee for the Paneuropean Union analyses the reasons which led to the open crisis within the European Common Market and mentions the blackmailing of France. Source: Bulletin mensuel d'information du Comité français pour l'Union paneuropéenne. dir. de publ. De Montalais, J. Juillet 1965, n° 38. Paris: Comité français pour l'Union paneuropéenne. "La crise du Marché commun". Copyright: (c) Translation CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/crisis_in_the_common_market_from_the_bulletin_mensuel _d_information_du_comite_francais_pour_l_union_paneuropeenne_july_1965-en- d582ab91-6234-433e-bfd2-e774d848086a.html Last updated: 05/07/2016 1/4 Crisis in the Common Market The crisis in the Common Market is very serious because, by blackmailing France, those who provoked it have deliberately undermined the Community principles laid down in the Treaty of Rome. The six EEC countries have unequal resources and produce unequal wealth, both in volume and in type. The principle involves pooling this wealth to make a whole. France has significant agriculture, while Germany has powerful industry. The former agrees — and agreed — to open its borders to products manufactured across the Rhine; the latter had to open its markets to our agricultural produce; if it did not do so (it and the others), it had to consider (with France and the others) the surpluses as surpluses common to everyone, the Six dividing up any costs relating to their marketing in third countries amongst themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Citizens Forces – Common European Future
    Slovenian Paneuropean Movement Slovenian Paneuropean Movement JOINT CITIZENS FORCES – COMMON EUROPEAN FUTURE I n n e c essa riis uni t a s, i n dub iis liber t a s, i n omn i bus c arit as. Dejan Hribar (ed.) JOINT CITIZENS FORCES – COMMON EUROPEAN FUTURE Title: Joint Citizens Forces – Common European Future Editor: Dejan Hribar Proofreading: Aleš Lampe Design: Miša Gorjup Publisher: Slovensko panevropsko gibanje, Cesta v prod 90, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia www.panevropa.si | http://jocicef.panevropa.si/index.php/sl/e-publication Ljubljana, May 2019 Co-founded by the Europe for Citizens Programme of the European Union With the support of the Europe for Citizens Programme of the European Union The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the content, which reflects the views of the authors only, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. The content of the articles also does not necessarily reflect the positions or opinion of the Slovenian Paneuropean Movement or the editor, who cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Kataložni zapis o publikaciji (CIP) pripravili v Narodni in univerzitetni knjižnici v Ljubljani COBISS.SI-ID=300529408 ISBN 978-961-90892-6-2 (pdf) JOINT CITIZENS FORCES – COMMON EUROPEAN FUTURE Slovenian Paneuropean Movement INTRODUCTION Laris Gaiser, President of the Slovenian Paneuropean Movement E-mail: [email protected] The Slovenian Paneuropean Movement and its partners have successfully concluded the JOCIC- EF project, co-funded by the Europe for Citizens Programme of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobles of the Czech Lands in European Diplomacy Project Proposal
    THE NOBLES OF THE CZECH LANDS IN EUROPEAN DIPLOMACY project proposal Šlechta českých zemí v evropské diplomacii M návrh projektu 1 the project The Nobles of the Czech Lands in European Diplomacy is part of the long-term programme of the Czech National Heritage Institute entitled In the Footsteps of Noble Families. The aim of this programme is to research and present the cultural historical heritage of the noble families whose former residences fall under the care of the National Heritage Institute. Annually, the project focuses on either a particular family (for example, the Rosenbergs in 2011; the Lords of Kunštát in 2014), or reflects a certain theme associated with nobles (Year of the Renaissance Aristocracy, 2017). 2 The Nobles of the Czech Lands in European Diplomacy / project proposal 1. 2 3 4 5 In the year of 2018 the project is to focus on the theme of nobles within diplomacy, and for three essential reasons: 1. Due to their privileged social position nobles have naturally participated in diplomacy since as far back as the middle ages and important aristocrats have worked in the diplomatic service even in the era of civic society beginning in the 19th century including the period of the Czechoslovak Republic after 1918. 2. The National Heritage Institute has in its care an exceptionally valuable and extensive collection of artefacts, documents, and other materials associated with the diplomatic activities of nobles. 3. The diplomatic activities of nobles have left an indelible footprint in European and world history, and so represent an exceptionally appropriate theme for 2018, the European Year of Cultural Heritage, as announced by the European Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • German Issues 18 Roman Herzog
    G E R M A N I S S U E S ROMAN HERZOG LESSONS FROM THE PAST VISIONS FOR THE FUTURE with an introduction by Steven Muller GERMAN ISSUES 18 American Institute for Contemporary German Studies The Johns Hopkins University INTRODUCTION Steven Muller This selection of major addresses by Roman Herzog acquaints the reader with the vigorous personality and pragmatic mind set of the current President of the Federal Republic of Germany. The seventh person to hold that office since the Federal Republic came into being in 1949, Roman Herzog took office on July 11, 1994 and is now in the fourth year of his five-year term. As Federal President, Herzog serves as head of state, but not as leader of the government. That role falls to the federal chancellor, whom the President appoints according to the majority mandate of the Federal Parliament. Thus the federal presidency is representative of the whole German people and therefore above political partisanship.* Nevertheless, as once pointed out by Walter Scheel, the fourth Federal President, “as long as this office is not hereditary, it is a political office.” And, indeed, like his predecessors, Roman Herzog came to the office after a rich career in politics and public service. The first Bavarian to serve as Federal President, Herzog was born in Landshut in 1934, studied law at the University in Munich and then became a professor of jurisprudence and the author of the leading commentary on the German constitution, the Basic Law. In 1973, however, he entered political life as a state secretary representing the state of Rhineland-Palatinate in Bonn.
    [Show full text]
  • Open in PDF Format
    Austria in Europe — Introduction Source: CVCE. Michael Gehler. Copyright: (c) CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/austria_in_europe_introduction-en-54ed9ccb-70d5- 4930-b20e-2f1dbd161af9.html Last updated: 08/07/2016 1/9 Austria in Europe Approach path to Europe (OEEC 1948, Council of Europe 1956, EFTA 1960, Free Trade Agreement 1972) Austria’s relationship with Europe and European integration can be understood only against a broader historical background. As early as the 1920s Richard N. Coudenhove-Kalergi, of Austro-Hungarian descent, promoted the pan-European idea. The Paneuropean Union had its headquarters in the Hofburg in Vienna. In the absence of realistic alternatives, Federal Chancellor Ignaz Seipel championed the concept of ‘Mitteleuropa’. As the successor state to the Danube monarchy, Austria was in no way an underdeveloped country on the fringes, but rather an industrialised state in the very centre of Europe. In the aftermath of the Second World War, the issue of its recovery and continued political existence was, however, at first an open one. The United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA) and the European Recovery Program (ERP) contributed assistance and funding which did much to further the economic reconstruction of Austria and the process of political consolidation. The ÖVP gave its agreement to the nationalisation of industry sought by the SPÖ, while the SPÖ was prepared to approve Marshall Plan aid, which was posited on acceptance of private property.
    [Show full text]
  • European Elites and Ideas of Empire, 1917…1957
    EUROPEAN ELITES AND IDEAS OF EMPIRE, 1917–1957 Who thought of Europe as a community before its economic integra- tion in 1957? Dina Gusejnova illustrates how a supranational European mentality was forged from depleted imperial identities. In the revolutions of 1917–1920, the power of the Hohenzollern, Habsburg, and Romanoff dynasties over their subjects expired. Even though Germany lost its credit as a world power twice in that century, in the global cultural memory, the old Germanic families remained associated with the idea of Europe in areas reaching from Mexico to the Baltic region and India. Gusejnova’s book sheds light on a group of German-speaking intellectuals of aristocratic origin who became pioneers of Europe’s future regeneration. In the minds of transnational elites, the continent’s future horizons retained the con- tours of phantom empires. This title is available as Open Access at 10.1017/9781316343050. dina gusejnova is Lecturer in Modern History at the University of Sheffield. new studies in european history Edited by peter baldwin, University of California, Los Angeles christopher clark, University of Cambridge james b. collins, Georgetown University mia rodriguez-salgado, London School of Economics and Political Science lyndal roper, University of Oxford timothy snyder, Yale University The aim of this series in early modern and modern European history is to publish outstanding works of research, addressed to important themes across a wide geographical range, from southern and central Europe, to Scandinavia and Russia, from the time of the Renaissance to the present. As it develops, the series will comprise focused works of wide contextual range and intellectual ambition.
    [Show full text]