Interim Report for Chemehuevi Wash Off-Highway Vehicle Area, CA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Interim Report for Chemehuevi Wash Off-Highway Vehicle Area, CA United States In cooperation with Department of United States Agriculture Department of the Interim Report for Interior, Bureau of Land Management, and the Soil Survey of Mojave Desert Resource Conservation Natural District Chemehuevi Wash Resources Conservation Service Off-Highway Vehicle Area, Part of the Desert Area, California i How To Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is a color map, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. ii This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 2004. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 2005. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 2004. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Bureau of Land Management and Mojave Desert Resource Conservation District. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all of its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice or TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: Granitic Fan Remnant 4-6" p.z. ecological site on the Riverbend soil in detailed soil map unit 2010, in the northwest corner of the survey area. (Photograph by Leon Lato, Natural Resources Conservation Service.) Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available on the Natural Resources Conservation Service home page on the World Wide Web. The address is http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. iii Contents How To Use This Soil Survey .................................. i 2400—Carrizo-Carrwash association, 2 to 8 Contents ................................................................. iii percent slopes ............................................. 29 How This Survey Was Made.................................... 1 2401—Carrizo-Carrwash association, eroded, General Soil Map Units........................................... 3 2 to 8 percent slopes ................................... 31 Soils on Fan Piedmonts........................................ 3 Use and Management of the Soils ....................... 33 1. Riverbend-Carrizo-Chemehuevi-Garywash ..... 3 Interpretive Ratings ............................................ 33 2. Carrizo, frequently flooded-Carrwash .............. 4 Rating Class Terms ........................................ 33 Soils on Hills ........................................................ 5 Numerical Ratings .......................................... 33 3. Goldroad-Stormjade-Whipple .......................... 5 Land Capability Classification............................. 33 4. Sunrock ......................................................... 6 Major Land Resource Area ................................. 34 Detailed Soil Map Units .......................................... 7 Rangeland .......................................................... 34 1200—Goldroad very gravelly sandy loam, Vegetation ...................................................... 35 15 to 50 percent slopes .................................. 8 Dominant Ecological Sites ............................. 35 1210—Stormjade-Goldroad complex, 8 to 50 Effects of Off-Highway Vehicles on percent slopes ............................................... 9 Ecological Sites ........................................ 36 1211—Stormjade-Whipple complex, 8 to 50 Burrowing Habitat for Desert Tortoise ................. 41 percent slopes ............................................. 10 Urban Uses and Recreation ................................ 42 1400—Sunrock complex, 8 to 50 percent Camp Areas ................................................... 42 slopes .......................................................... 12 Picnic Areas .................................................. 43 1401—Sunrock-Cheme family association, Playgrounds ................................................... 44 8 to 50 percent slopes .................................. 13 Paths and Trails .............................................. 44 1402—Sunrock-Cheme family-Rock outcrop Off-Road Motorcycle Trails ............................. 45 association, 8 to 50 percent slopes.............. 14 Lawns, Landscaping, and Golf Fairways ........ 45 1500—Carrizo extremely gravelly fine sandy Engineering ........................................................ 46 loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes.......................... 16 Building Site Development ............................. 46 1501—Carrizo very gravelly loamy sand, Sanitary Facilities ........................................... 49 30 to 75 percent slopes ................................ 17 Construction Materials ................................... 54 1502—Carrizo-Badland-Riverbend association, Water Management ........................................ 55 8 to 75 percent slopes .................................. 18 Soil Properties ...................................................... 57 1503—Carrizo association, 2 to 8 percent Engineering Index Properties ............................. 57 slopes .......................................................... 19 Physical Properties ............................................ 58 2000—Riverbend very gravelly fine sandy Chemical Properties ........................................... 59 loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes ........................ 21 Water Features ................................................... 60 2001—Riverbend-Chemehuevi association, Soil Features ...................................................... 60 2 to 30 percent slopes .................................. 22 Classification of the Soils .................................... 63 2010—Chemehuevi-Carrizo-Riverbend Badland and Taxonomic Units and Their complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes .................. 23 Morphology ......................................................... 63 2011—Cololag gravelly silt loam, 1 to 4 Badland .............................................................. 63 percent slopes ............................................. 25 Carrizo Series ..................................................... 64 2020—Snaggletooth-Carrizo association, Carrwash Series ................................................. 65 1 to 8 percent slopes ................................... 25 Cheme Family .................................................... 66 2030—Garywash gravelly fine sandy loam, Chemehuevi Series ............................................ 66 4 to 15 percent slopes .................................. 27 Cololag Series .................................................... 69 2031—Garywash-Chemehuevi complex, Garywash Series ................................................ 70 2 to 8 percent slopes ................................... 28 Goldroad Series .................................................. 73 iv Riverbend Series ................................................ 74 Table 6a.—Building Site Development Snaggletooth Series ........................................... 75 (Part 1) ....................................................... 123 Stormjade Series ................................................ 77 Table 6b.—Building Site Development Sunrock Series ................................................... 78 (Part 2) ....................................................... 127 Whipple Series ................................................... 79
Recommended publications
  • Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118
    Hydrologic Region Colorado River California’s Groundwater Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 7-43 • County: San Bernardino • Surface Area: 273,000 acres (427 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology This basin underlies Chemehuevi Valley in eastern San Bernardino County. The basin is bounded by Havasu Lake on the east and by nonwater-bearing rocks of the Sacramento Mountains on the north, of the Chemehuevi Mountains on the northeast, of the Whipple Mountains on the southeast, of the Turtle Mountains on the west and south (Bishop 1963). The valley is drained by Chemehuevi Wash to Havasu Lake. Annual average precipitation ranges from about 4 to 6 inches. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Groundwater in the basin is found in alluvium and the Bouse Formation. Alluvium. Holocene age younger alluvium, which is found in washes and the floodplain of the Colorado River, is composed of sand, silt and gravel (Metzger and Loeltz 1973). Older alluvium consists of unconsolidated, fine- to coarse-grained sand, pebbles, and boulders with variable amounts of silt and clay. Bouse Formation. The Pliocene age Bouse Formation is composed of a basal limestone bed overlain by interbedded clay, silt, and sand. Thickness of the formation reaches 254 feet (Metzger and Loeltz 1973). The formation is underlain by locally derived fanglomerate and overlain by alluviums of the Colorado River and its tributaries. Restrictive Structures An unnamed fault crosses a portion of the southern side of the basin (Bishop 1963), but it is not known whether or not this fault impedes groundwater flow in the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Seasonal Movements of Bendire's Thrasher in California
    WESTERN BIRDS Volume 20, Number 3, 1989 DISTRIBUTION AND SEASONAL MOVEMENTS OF BENDIRE'S THRASHER IN CALIFORNIA A. SIDNEY ENGLAND, Departmentof Wildlifeand FisheriesBiology, University of California, Davis. California 95616 WILLIAM E LAUDENSLAYER,JR., U.S. D. A. ForestService, Forestry Sciences Laboratory,2081 E. SierraAvenue, Fresno, California 93710 The ecology and distribution of Bendire's Thrasher (Toxostorna bendirei)have been little studiedand are poorlyunderstood. Garrett and Dunn (1981:280) classifiedthe speciesas a "fairlycommon but very local summer resident on the Mojave Desert" in southern California. Californiabreeding populations are known primarily from the eastern Mojave Desert and scattered locations in and around Joshua Tree NationalMonument in the southernMojave Desert (Johnson et al. 1948, Miller and Stebbins1964, Garrett and Dunn 1981), areas frequently visitedby bird watchersand naturalists. However, recordsfrom other parts of the Mojave and Colorado deserts suggest that breeding populationsof Bendire'sThrasher may be more widely distributedthan currentlyrecognized. Also, the preferredbreeding habitat in Californiais relativelywidespread. This habitatis typicallydescribed as Mojavedesert scrubwith either JoshuaTrees (Yucca brevifolia), SpanishBayonet (Y. baccata), Mojave Yucca (Y. schidigera), cholla cactus (Opuntia acanthocarpa,O. echinocarpa,or O. rarnosissirna),or other succulents (Grinnelland Miller 1944, Bent 1948, Garrett and Dunn 1981). Remsen(1978) consideredthe total Californiabreeding population of Bendire'sThrasher to be under 200 pairs, and the specieshas been placedon the list of Bird Speciesof SpecialConcern by the California Departmentof Fishand Game (Remsen1978). It was placedon this list becausepopulations are smalland locallydistributed and believedto be threatenedby off-roadvehicle use, overgrazing,and harvestingof Joshua Treesand other speciesof yucca. In this paper, we report the resultsof a 2-year studyof the breeding- season distributionand movement patterns of Bendire's Thrasher in California.
    [Show full text]
  • (LHFO) Proposed Resource Management Plan
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE 02-21-05-F-0784 June 15, 2006 Memorandum To: Field Manager, Lake Havasu Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, Lake Havasu City, Arizona From: Field Supervisor Subject: Biological Opinion on the Effects of the Lake Havasu Field Office (LHFO) Proposed Resource Management Plan Thank you for your request for formal section 7 consultation on the final Lake Havasu Field Office District Proposed Resource Management Plan (PRMP), pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (Act). Species addressed in this consultation include effects of your proposed action on the following species: • Endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) (SWWF) • Threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) (BAEA) • Endangered razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) (RBS) and critical habitat. • Endangered bonytail chub (Gila elegans) (BTC) and critical habitat • Endangered Yuma clapper rail (Rallus longirostris yumanensis) (YCR) • Threatened desert tortoise – Mohave Desert Population (Gopherus agassizii) (MDT) You have also requested our concurrence with your determination that the proposed action may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, the endangered California brown pelican (Pelicanus occidentalis californicus) and the candidate western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis). We concur with these determinations, which are addressed in Appendix A at the end of this memorandum. This biological opinion (BO) is based on information provided in the November 28, 2005, biological assessment (BA), the PRMP EIS, email correspondence, updated memos, telephone conversations, site investigations, meetings between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and us, and other sources of information (all this information is considered part of the proposed 2 action).
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Whipple Mountains
    $5.00 (Free to Members) VOL. 35, NO. 1 • WINTER 2007 FREMONTIA JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY FLORA OF THE WHIPPLE MOUNTAINS— THE “NOSE” OF CALIFORNIA INVASIVEINVASIVE PLANTSPLANTS IMPACTIMPACT TRADITIONALTRADITIONAL BASKETRY PLANTS NATIVE GRASSES IN THE GARDEN REMEMBERING GRADY WEBSTER BUCKEYEVOLUME 35:1, AS WINTERBONSAI 2007 AN ORCHID IN SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY FREMONTIA CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5113 Phone: (916) 447-CNPS (2677) Fax: (916) 447-2727 VOL. 35, NO. 1, WINTER 2007 Web site: www.cnps.org Email: [email protected] Copyright © 2007 MEMBERSHIP California Native Plant Society Membership form located on inside back cover; dues include subscriptions to Fremontia and the Bulletin Bart O’Brien, Editor Bob Hass, Copy Editor Mariposa Lily . $1,500 Family or Group . $75 Benefactor . $600 International . $75 Beth Hansen-Winter, Designer Patron . $300 Individual or Library . $45 Brad Jenkins, Jake Sigg, and Carol Plant Lover . $100 Student/Retired/Limited Income . $25 Witham, Proofreaders STAFF CHAPTER COUNCIL CALIFORNIA NATIVE Sacramento Office: Alta Peak (Tulare) . Joan Stewart PLANT SOCIETY Executive Director . Amanda Jorgenson Bristlecone (Inyo-Mono) . Sherryl Taylor Development Director/Finance Channel Islands . Lynne Kada Dedicated to the Preservation of Manager . Cari Porter the California Native Flora Dorothy King Young (Mendocino/ Membership Assistant . Christina Sonoma Coast) . Lori Hubbart The California Native Plant Society Neifer East Bay . Elaine P. Jackson (CNPS) is a statewide nonprofit organi- El Dorado . Amy Hoffman zation dedicated to increasing the un- At Large: Kern County . Lucy Clark derstanding and appreciation of Califor- Fremontia Editor . Bart O’Brien Los Angeles/Santa Monica Mtns .
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Spiritual Geographies of Indigenous Sovereignty Connections of Caxcan with Tlachialoyantepec
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Spiritual Geographies of Indigenous Sovereignty Connections of Caxcan with Tlachialoyantepec and Chemehuevi with Mamapukaib A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Daisy Ocampo December 2019 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Clifford E. Trafzer, Chairperson Dr. Rebecca Kugel Dr. Robert Perez Copyright by Daisy Ocampo 2019 The Dissertation of Daisy Ocampo is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I wish to thank many people, tribes, and institutions for all their support, knowledge, and patience. Thank you firstly to my three committee-members: Cliff Trafzer, Rebecca ‘Monte’ Kugel, and Robert Perez. I must especially acknowledge Cliff Trafzer for providing me all of the guidance I needed every step of the way. On behalf of my family and Caxcan people from El Remolino, thank you for believing in this research project, in the power of our sacred places, and the value of our rich knowledge. I wish to express my gratitude to the California Center for the Native Nations, Rupert Costo for Native American Affairs and the gracious support from the Graduate Assistant in Areas of National Need (GAANN) Fellowship. This report also would not have been possible without the Native American Land Conservancy, 29 Palms Band of Mission Indians and the Mike Family. To Matt Leivas, who kindly offered me his knowledge through the rich oral histories he possesses while also taking the time to introduce me to the people of Chemehuevi Indian Reservation including his sister June Leivas, I extend many thanks to them all for we share the common bond of a mutual deep respect for our sacred sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Stepladder Mountains Endangered Desert Legacy
    Stepladder Mountains Endangered Desert Legacy Location: The Stepladder Mountains area is located in the Mojave Desert, in San Bernardino County, to the west of the town of Havasu Lake. The Sacramento Mountains lie to the north and the Turtle Mountains lie to the south. Highway 95 lies to the east and Ward Valley lies to the west. This area abuts the existing Stepladder Mountains Wilderness area. Management Agency: Bureau of Land Management, Needles Field Office Description: The western portion of the existing Wilderness area consists of the relatively low, elongated volcanic Stepladder Mountains. This small range extends for about 10 miles in a north-south direction. The area gently slopes eastward to the northern end of the Chemehuevi Wash and westward to Homer Wash. A significant portion of this area consists of flat bajadas and associated washes, providing excellent desert tortoise habitat. Elevations range from about 1,750 feet to about 2,650 feet. Wildlife and Plants: Species which make this area their home include the protected desert bighorn sheep and golden eagle, and the threatened desert tortoise. Other species which can be found here include the black-tailed jackrabbit, coyote, Emory's crucifixion-thorn, glandular ditaxis, ground squirrel, kangaroo rat (photo above), Le Conte's thrasher, burrowing owl, prairie falcon, quail, roadrunner, and rattlesnake. The importance of the area to the continued viability of the desert tortoise cannot be exaggerated. The area has been designated as critical habitat for the desert tortoise. Scientists have found that the region has had some of the highest tortoise population densities in the eastern Mojave Desert.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Birds
    WESTERN BIRDS Volume 20, Number 3, 1989 DISTRIBUTION AND SEASONAL MOVEMENTS OF BENDIRE'S THRASHER IN CALIFORNIA A. SIDNEY ENGLAND, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Biology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 WILLIAM F. LAUDENSLAYER, JR., U. S. D. A. Forest Service, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 2081 E. Sierra Avenue, Fresno, California 93710 The ecology and distribution of Bendire's Thrasher (Toxostoma bendirei) have been little studied and are poorly understood. Garrett and Dunn (1981:280) classified the species as a "fairly common but very local summer resident on the Mojave Desert" in southern California. California breeding populations are known primarily from the eastern Mojave Desert and scattered locations in and around Joshua Tree National Monument in the southern Mojave Desert (Johnson et al. 1948, Miller and Stebbins 1964, Garrett and Dunn 1981), areas frequently visited by bird watchers and naturalists. However, records from other parts of the Mojave and Colorado deserts suggest that breeding populations of Bendire's Thrasher may be more widely distributed than currently recognized. Also, the preferred breeding habitat in California is relatively widespread. This habitat is typically described as Mojave desert scrub with either Joshua Trees (Yucca brevifolia), Spanish Bayonet (Y baccata), Mojave Yucca (Y. schidigera), cholla cactus (Opuntia acanthocarpa, 0. echinocarpa, or 0. ramosissima), or other succulents (Grinnell and Miller 1944, Bent 1948, Garrett and Dunn 1981). Remsen (1978) considered the total California breeding population of Bendire's Thrasher to be under 200 pairs, and the species has been placed on the list of Bird Species of Special Concern by the California Department of Fish and Game (Remsen 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix L, Bureau of Land Management Worksheets
    Chemehuevi Description/Location: The north edge of the unit adjoins the southern and eastern boundary of Mojave National Preserve and the Nevada border and extends south and east to the Colorado River and Riverside County. There are 3 expansions areas proposed for this ACEC. The existing ACEC and proposed ACEC expansions and NLCS lands would link and connect the protected lands in ten wilderness areas (Trilobite, Clipper Mountains, Piute Mountains, Bigelow Cholla, Dead Mountains, Old Woman Mountains, Turtle Mountains, Stepladder Mountains, Whipple Mountains, and Chemehuevi Mountains) with Mojave National Preserve. This extensive and contiguous conservation landscape would stretch from the Colorado River region to the higher East Mojave desert. Nationally Significant Values: Ecological: This area encompasses a transition zone between both Mojave and Sonoran Desert ecosystems. Chemehuevi Wash is one of the largest desert wash systems in the US portion of the Sonoran Desert. The area has some of the best desert tortoise habitat in the southeast Mojave and northeast Sonoran Deserts. The Chemehuevi Desert Wildlife Management Area was established to protect and conserve this desert tortoise habitat. The transitional ecosystem attracts a variety of birds including BLM sensitive species such as prairie falcons, gray vireo, Bendire’s thrasher, and burrowing owls. Specialized habitats include dunes for Mojave fringe‐toed lizards and roosting habitat for several bat species. Numerous rare and sensitive plants inhabit the area including Emory’s crucifixion thorn, white margined penstemon, scrub lotus, rosy two‐ toned beardtongue, as well as Cryptantha clokeyi, Ditaxis claryana, Juncus nodosus, Mentzelia tricuspis, Opuntia wigginsii, and Psorothamnus fremontii var. attenuates. Between the Clipper Mountains and the Trilobite Wilderness areas is Bonanza Spring, one of the few natural watering areas for wildlife in the Mojave Desert.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado River Miles Chart
    FOREWORD This river mile index for the Lower Colorado River lists river mileages that were determined from measurements made on Bureau of Reclamation aerial orthophotographs and U.S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangles. The Geological Survey and Bureau of Reclamation furnished information on stream gage locations, drainage areas and water surface elevation. River mile distances were measured upstream to the nearest tenth of a mile. The starting point for the Lower Colorado River mile index is at the southerly international boundary with Mexico. In cases where tributary washes did not have a well defined channel from the Colorado River to where they met the valley floor, the starting point was located at a latitude and longitude where the channel was well defined. Tributaries are shown as entering from the right or left from a position facing downstream. Elevation of water surface is shown at the average elevations in impoundments. The discharge pattern of the Colorado River between Davis Dam and Imperial Dam is influenced by daily power demands and seasonal irrigation and municipal and industrial requirements. The water surface elevations shown for this reach represent typical daily highs occurring during the summer period. This index was prepared by the Boulder Canyon Operations Office, Lower Colorado Region, Bureau of Reclamation. August 2001 RIVER MILE INDEX LOWER COLORADO RIVER River M ile Description Drainage Water Elev. Location Area Miles Sq. Miles Feet 0.0 Southerly International Boundary (L) 0.2 Stream gage, IBWC- 09522200, Colorado River at Southerly International Boundary near SAN LUIS, Arizona (R) 243,000 75.7 2.4 Outlet of Hunter=s Hole and Twenty-One Mile Mile Wasteway (L) 6.1 GADSDEN, Arizona (L) 18.8 Eleven Mile Wasteway (L) 21.6 Cooper Wasteway (old location) (L) 22.0 Main Outlet Drain-M.O.D.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Geohydrology of the Needles Area, Arizona, California, and Nevada
    Geohydrology of the Needles Area, Arizona, California, and Nevada GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 486-J Geohydrology of the Needles Area, Arizona, California, and Nevada By D. G. METZGER and O. J. LOELTZ WATER RESOURCES OF LOWER COLORADO RIVER SALTON SEA AREA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 486-J UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600334 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 2401-02212 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract._ _________________________________________ Jl Ground-water resources of the Needles area--------_-_- J18 18 Introduction-______________________________________ 3 Occurrence_ ___________-____-_-____-_--_--_--- Rocharge_-_________-____-__--__-----_------__- 18 Purpose of investigation_________________________ 3 Dischargs____ _ _________-__-_--__--_--------__-- 19 Location of area._______________________________ 3 Historicael ketch._____-____--__--__---_--_--_- 19 Methods of investigation.____---__-_-.__________ 3 Develepment of irrigation _________________ 20 Surface features________________________________ 3 River stages.____________-________------_-_ 21 Climate.______________________________________ 6 Hydrologic characteristics of aquifers __________ 23 Acknowledgments.--.- _ _-_--_____-_-_-________-_ 7 Definition of terms-_-__-_---------_------__- 23 Well-numbering
    [Show full text]
  • Bendire's Thrasher (Toxostoma Bendirei)
    II SPECIES ACCOUNTS Andy Birch PDF of Bendire’s Thrasher account from: Shuford, W. D., and Gardali, T., editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. California Bird Species of Special Concern BENDIRE’S THRASHER (Toxostoma bendirei) John Sterling Criteria Scores Population Trend 5 Range Trend 0 Population Size 10 Range Size 10 Endemism 0 Population Concentration 5 Threats 10 + Breeding Range + Recent Extralimital Breeding County Boundaries Water Bodies Kilometers 80 40 0 80 Breeding range of the Bendire’s Thrasher in California. An increase in the known breeding range in the latter half of the 20th century appears to reflect greater observer coverage rather than thrasher expansion. A sharp decline in numbers in the western Mojave sometime between the late 1980s and 2001, apparently now reversed, may be indicative of annual variation in the thrasher’s response to fluctuating climatic conditions or other forces influencing population dynamics at the edge of the species’ range. Bendire’s Thrasher Studies of Western Birds 1:311–315, 2008 311 Studies of Western Birds No. 1 SPECIAL CONCERN PRIORITY within the park from 1945 to 1960 failed to find this species (Miller and Stebbins 1964). Currently considered a Bird Species of Special Concern (breeding), priority 3. Included on the list since its inception (Remsen 1978, 3rd priority; RECENT RANGE AND ABUNDANCE CDFG 1992). IN CALIFORNIA Although the current range in California includes BREEDING BIRD SURVEY STATISTICS many locations where thrashers were unknown FOR CALIFORNIA prior to 1945, this most likely represents a sub- Data inadequate for trend assessment (Sauer et stantial increase in survey effort rather than a al.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Magazine 1955 November
    PRAYER FOR NIGHT-FOLK DO WE UNDERSTAND LIFE (Acrostic) OF THE DESERT tt and By DARRELL TOTTEN By ELS:E MCKINMON STRACHAN By TANYA SOITH Henderson. Nevada Santa Ana, California Deep down wilhin the complex brain of man How then has good Fate passed you by. One cell alone determines that brain's plan. Kindler of twilight, weaver of shadow, When il is pain and grief that make Guard while these small folk pattern in Tha soul for greater wisdom cry. Which one of us can dare to think that he braille. And unto greater lJght awake? Exemplifies that which all men should be? Stories of night life, unknown to day crea- tures, For pain and grief are but the tools Utopia has ever been our dream: Recording on sand in minutest detail. That scour and polish and bisect, Now and then a wish—now and then a Until we learn to follow Rules. scheme. Let safety be with them, the chipmunk and And Light alone reflect. Do we believe the words our lips repeat? rabbit, Each war we wage leads only to defeat. Badger and beetle and vinegaroon; Reason, it seems, deserts us in the end; That I may decipher, before wind erases. Somehow we shape the truth and lie to Notes they have left beneath the pale moon. FANTASY blend! Today we stand again, where we once stood Give them the time for love and home- By GRACE STAPLES Ages ago, and speak of Brotherhood. building, I stood in a desert beside a palm. Nature, we say, makes us behave as fools— For racing and rollicking in the sand; I'd lost my hold on the ways of men.
    [Show full text]